Notebookcheck

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 (GT3 + eDRAM), also called the HD Graphics 5200, is a processor graphics card that is included in some of the Haswell processors of 2013 (e.g. Core i7-4750HQ). It represents the highest configuration of the integrated graphics unit (40 execution units) and also has an additional eDRAM cache (128 MB on-package, 77 mm², 102 GB/s). The base clock can be automatically overclocked using Turbo Boost technology. Depending on the processor model, the base and turbo clock rates may differ (usually up to 1200 - 1300 MHz), resulting in varying graphics performance between CPU models.

In comparison to the HD 4000, the graphics core has been modified extensively. The Iris Pro supports DirectX 11.1, OpenCL 1.2 and OpenGL 4.0. It also features an improved decoder for 4K videos and the fast Quick Sync encoder.

Thanks to the fast eDRAM memory, the average performance of the Iris Pro is only about 15 percent behind the dedicated mid-range cards GeForce GT 650M and GT 750M (DDR3 versions). This makes the Iris Pro even faster than AMDs Radeon HD 8650G and the fastest integrated GPU of 2013. Therefore, many current games can be played fluently in medium or high detail settings and a resolution of 1366 x 768 pixels. In some older or less demanding titels like Diablo III or Fifa 2013, even higher resolutions or quality settings may be possible.

Due to the 22nm 3D Tri-Gate production process, power consumption should be relatively low. The Iris Pro can be found on certain quad-core Haswell CPUs in the 47 Watt TDP range.

ManufacturerIntel
Iris Series
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 compare 48 @ 300 - 1150 MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 40 @ 200 - 1300 MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 6100 compare 48 @ 300 - 1100 MHz64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 5100 compare 40 @ 200 - 1200 MHz64/128 Bit
CodenameHaswell GT3e
ArchitectureGen. 7.5 Haswell
Pipelines40 - unified
Core Speed200 - 1300 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus WidtheDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Memory TypeeDRAM
Max. Amount of Memory128 MB
Shared Memoryyes
DirectXDirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0
technology22 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement05.06.2013
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-4870HQ4 x 2500 MHz, 47 W200 MHz1200 MHz
Intel Core i7-4950HQ4 x 2400 MHz, 47 W200 MHz1300 MHz
Intel Core i7-4860HQ4 x 2400 MHz, 47 W200 MHz1200 MHz
» show 4 more
min. - max.200 - 200 MHz1200 - 1300 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
10 pt (10%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 9027     avg: 9915     median: 9877 (15%)     max: 10879 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 11338     avg: 11951     median: 11930 (6%)     max: 12584 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 1281     avg: 1376     median: 1340 (5%)     max: 1543 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 1357     avg: 1414     median: 1380.5 (3%)     max: 1536 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 86896     avg: 99805     median: 99804.5 (13%)     max: 112713 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 2112     avg: 2216     median: 2217 (6%)     max: 2364 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 1867     avg: 1916     median: 1923 (4%)     max: 1957 points
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
41727 Points (43%)
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 11
Siemens NX 1920x1080 +
Tcvis 1920x1080 +
SolidWorks 1920x1080 +
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 +
Maya 1920x1080 +
Lightwave 1920x1080 +
Ensight 1920x1080 +
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 +
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 +
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 +
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 +
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 +
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 +
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 +
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
min: 307     avg: 325     median: 329 (3%)     max: 338 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 447     avg: 461     median: 461 (4%)     max: 475 Samples/s
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
26.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
35.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
26.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
51  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
25.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
117  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
62.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1366x768
111  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
73  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
59.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
49.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
31 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
168  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
46.5 48.7 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
38.4 38.4 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.2 7.8 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
47.8 54 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.1 38.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15 17 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.6 8.6 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
28 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12 (!)   fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Crew

The Crew

2014
low 1280x720
45  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.4 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
39.3 51.5 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.3 32.1 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.7 11.4 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.5 6.2 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
26.5 30.7 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.8 23.6 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.4 12.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7 8.5 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
8 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
49.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
53.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
80  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
24.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
69  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
47  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
44  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
29  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
low 1280x720
87.9 92 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
59.9 67 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37 40.7 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
178 194.9 ~ 186 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
68 fps 68.4 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.7 34.7 fps ~ 34 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.1 24.3 fps ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
52  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
38  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
140  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
33.1 33.8 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.4 21.9 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.7 6.1 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
54.5 fps  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
52.4 fps  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.6 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
66  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
43  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
32  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Titanfall

Titanfall

2014
low 1024x768
57.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
24.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
30.7 36.1 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.4 22.3 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16 17.2 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!) 7.4 ~ 4 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
35.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14.8 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.5 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
27.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
20  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
58  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
62.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
3.9 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
105  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
65  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
low 1024x768
105  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
65  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
55  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
low 1024x768
338  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
200  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
156  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
91  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
87  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
64  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
44  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
35.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
60.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
68.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
102  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
72.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
25.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
116.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
42.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
47.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
78.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
35.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
306  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
92  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
61  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
SimCity

SimCity

2013
low 1024x768
219.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
24.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
123.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
58.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
35.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
45.9 50.7 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.9 31.4 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.4 20.9 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.9 7.7 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
164.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
73.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
55.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 3

Far Cry 3

2012
low 1024x768
57  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
44.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
92  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
67.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
89.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
74.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
67.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fifa 13

Fifa 13

2012
low 1024x768
317  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
197.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
149.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
80.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1366x768
41.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
83  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
31.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
240.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
181.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
88.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
77.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
24.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
133.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
86.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
75  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
60  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
134.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
64.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
39.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
70  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
36.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
46.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1366x768
112  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
ultra 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
high 1280x1024
71  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
high 1024x768
45  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.12
Heroes of the Storm (v35702) was playable in 1920x1080, high details preset at around 39 fps average (5 vs 5 online game recorded with Fraps). The drops below 20 fps were not reducing the gameplay but sometimes noticable.
Heroes of the Storm (v35702) was playable in 1920x1080, high details preset at around 39 fps average (5 vs 5 online game recorded with Fraps). The drops below 20 fps were not reducing the gameplay but sometimes noticable.
League of Legends (LoL) runs in 1920x1080 and full detail settings including Antialiasing with an average of 90 frames per second (4 vs 4 game with Fraps). The slowdowns in the chart were not noticable during gaming.
League of Legends (LoL) runs in 1920x1080 and full detail settings including Antialiasing with an average of 90 frames per second (4 vs 4 game with Fraps). The slowdowns in the chart were not noticable during gaming.

Video Decoder Performance

The integrated video decoder in the Iris Pro 5200 is able to decode MPEG2 videos up to 1080p and VC1, H.264, and WMV9 up to 2160p (4K QHD). In our tests a Clevo W740SU (Schenker S413) with a 4750HQ was able to fluently play back the video with low CPU load. The DXVAChecker Benchmark resulted in 220 fps and 6 % CPU load for a 3820x2160, 30fps, AVC [email protected] encoded video (100 Mbps overall).

DXVA Hooks
DXVA Hooks
DXVACHecker benchmark of a 4K 100 Mbps video
DXVACHecker benchmark of a 4K 100 Mbps video
Playback of a 4K video using WMP in Windows 8 (DXVA)
Playback of a 4K video using WMP in Windows 8 (DXVA)
Playback of a 4K video using Media Player Classic without DXVA
Playback of a 4K video using Media Player Classic without DXVA

Notebook reviews with Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 graphics card

ADATA DashDrive Durable HD650: Intel Core i7-4750HQ
  Review » Review ADATA DashDrive Durable HD650 500 GB

  Review » Review ADATA DashDrive Elite SE720 External SSD

MSI GS30 Shadow: Intel Core i7-4870HQ, 13.3", 1.3 kg
  Review » MSI GS30 Notebook Review

Schenker S413: Intel Core i7-4750HQ, 14", 1.9 kg
  Review » Review Schenker S413 (Clevo W740SU) Notebook

Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2014-07: Intel Core i7-4770HQ, 15.6", 2 kg
  External Review » Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2014-07

Asus R510JX-DM230T: Intel Core i7-4750HQ, 15.6", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus R510JX-DM230T

Cyberpower Zeus Hercules: Intel Core i7-4750HQ, 14", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Cyberpower Zeus Hercules

HP Envy 15-k301tu: Intel Core i7-4750HQ, 15.6", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-k301tu

MSI GS30 2M-016UK: Intel Core i7-4870HQ, 13.3", 1.2 kg
  External Review » MSI GS30 2M-016UK

MSI GS30 Shadow: Intel Core i7-4870HQ, 13.3", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI GS30 Shadow

Schenker S413: Intel Core i7-4750HQ, 14", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Schenker S413

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Class 3

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2016-01-26)