Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon R5 M240

AMD Radeon R5 M240

The AMD Radeon R5 M240 is an entry-level DirectX 12 graphics card for laptops, which is based on the Sun GPU (GCN architecture). The core is clocked at up to 1030 MHz and the DDR3 graphics memory runs at 900 MHz (64-bit interface).

Compared to the Mars chip (e.g. HD 8570M), Sun offers less hardware units. The GPU integrates 320 shaders, 20 TMUs and 4 ROPs and is therefore located in the low-end segment.

According to our benchmarks, the GPU beats Intels HD Graphics 4600 and performs similar to a Nvidia GeForce 820M. Current and demanding games of 2014 will run fluently only in low resolutions and detail settings.

The 320 shaders can be used with OpenCL 1.2 for general-purpose calculations (as 5 compute units). Compared to old TeraScale 2 chips, the GCN-based architecture offers improved performance in this framework.

The R5 series also supports automatic graphics switching between the integrated GPU and discrete GPU. Called Enduro, the technology supersedes AMD's Dynamic Switchable Graphics and is similar to Nvidia's Optimus. Furthermore, the Radeon can directly support multiple monitors using Eyefinity technology.

Other features of the R5 series include ZeroCore for reducing power consumption when the display is turned off and Power Gating to power down areas of the chip that are not used. PowerTune allows automatic overclocking and underclocking of the graphics card as long as the GPU is within its TDP limit. For example, the chip may be underclocked when running FurMark and OCCT, but will overclock in certain games.

The power consumption should be somewhat above the R5 M230. As a result, the R5 M240 is also suited for small subnotebooks.

Radeon R5 M200 Series

Radeon R5 M255 compare 320 @ 0.94 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 - 2000 MHz
Radeon R5 M240 320 @ 1.03 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Radeon R5 M230 compare 320 @ 0.86 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 - 2000 MHz
CodenameJet XT / Sun
ArchitectureGCN
Pipelines320 - unified
Core Speed1030 MHz
Memory Speed1800 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11.2, Shader 5.0
technology28 nm
FeaturesApp Acceleration, PowerPlay, PowerTune, ZeroCore, Enduro, Eyefinity, Mantle
Date of Announcement01.09.2014
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.4 pt (1%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 4032     avg: 4339     median: 4338.5 (4%)     max: 4645 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 5458     avg: 5500     median: 5500 (1%)     max: 5542 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 843     avg: 872     median: 871.5 (1%)     max: 900 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 921     avg: 949     median: 949 (1%)     max: 977 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 46696     avg: 48029     median: 48029 (5%)     max: 49362 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1640     avg: 1669     median: 1669 (2%)     max: 1698 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1575     avg: 1588     median: 1588 (1%)     max: 1601 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
5066 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
4761 Points (3%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 5556     avg: 5698     median: 5698 (7%)     max: 5840 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
18.3 fps (3%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3449     avg: 4578     median: 4578 (3%)     max: 5707 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 20.88     avg: 22.5     median: 22.5 (7%)     max: 24.17 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 24.17     avg: 26.9     median: 26.9 (2%)     max: 29.61 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
23.5 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
224 Samples/s (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
411 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1152 points (1%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
50  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
38.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1366x768
51.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
36.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
52.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
21.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
18.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
122.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
45.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
23  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Crew

The Crew

2014
low 1280x720
26.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
29.6 30.5 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.7 20.2 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
29  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
18.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
33.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
38 58 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28 40 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
24  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
30.2 33.9 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21 23.3 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
25.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
16.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
160.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
27.9 28.2 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.7 18 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
66.1 104.8 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30 46.7 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
20  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
32.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
28.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
13.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
21.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
26.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
40.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
17.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
42.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
16.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
49.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
27.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
45.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
90  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
59.6 62.8 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.4 31.6 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19.7 24 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
22.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
68.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
19  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
40.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
29.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
52  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
33  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Alan Wake

Alan Wake

2012
low 1024x768
22.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
76.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
35.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
68.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
36.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
FIFA 165038.5
World of Warships51.636.1
Metal Gear Solid V52.630
Mad Max21.1
Batman: Arkham Knight179
The Witcher 318.212
Dirt Rally122.731.1
Battlefield Hardline45.132.8
Evolve2317.5
The Crew26.119.4
Dragon Age: Inquisition3020
Far Cry 42919.6
Assassin's Creed Unity18.212
Civilization: Beyond Earth33.418.411.6
F1 2014483425
Ryse: Son of Rome2414.86.8
Alien: Isolation322212.1
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor25.516.9
Sims 4160.745.3
Risen 3: Titan Lords28178.7
GRID: Autosport853821.8
Watch Dogs2015.9
Wolfenstein: The New Order32.328.5
Thief13.311.810.3
X-Plane 10.2521.212.96.4
Battlefield 426.822.417.7
Total War: Rome II40.531.928.2
Saints Row IV17.413.810.8
Dota 242.631.7
Company of Heroes 216.416.39.9
GRID 249.73227.6
BioShock Infinite45.926.521.6
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm9041.328.1
Tomb Raider613122
Crysis 322.513.99.8
Dead Space 368.533.426.8
Hitman: Absolution1916.710.2
Dishonored40.532.529.6
Diablo III524133
Alan Wake22.512.9
Anno 207076.137.323.4
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim35.528.919.6
Deus Ex Human Revolution68.136.3
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
18
16
6
2
25
16

22
3










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 21. 04:56:51

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 19 May 2025 05:31:39 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.029s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 5971 +0.029s ... 0.058s

#8 got single benchmarks 5971 +0.008s ... 0.066s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.066s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.433s ... 0.5s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.5s

#12 Got 121 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.508s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.508s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.027s ... 0.534s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.222s ... 0.756s

#16 return log +0.004s ... 0.76s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter