Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M

The Nvidia GeForce GT 325M is a DirectX 10.1 capable middle class notebook graphics card. Technically it is a slower clocked GT 330M and similar to the GT 230M. The core clock of the chip is a bit below the GT 230M, but faster memory is supported. The power consumption should be a bit below the average GT 230M.


The performance of the GT 325M should be similar to the GeForce GT 230M and therefore located in the middle class. The card should support DirectX 10.1 and all the features of the GT 230M (as it is based on the same GT216 core). Therefore, PureVideo HD (with VP4?) and CUDA support should be in the chip.

As with the GT 230M, the performance depends on the used graphics memory. With slow DDR2, the card can be up to 20% slower than with faster memory.

GeForce GT 300M Series

GeForce GT 335M compare 72 @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 330M compare 48 @ 0.58 GHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 325M 48 @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 320M compare 24 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Pipelines48 - unified
Core Speed450 MHz
Shader Speed990 MHz
Memory Speed1066 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR2, GDDR3, DDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
technology40 nm
FeaturesDirectX Compute Support (Windows 7), CUDA, OpenCL, HybridPower, PhysX
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement10.01.2010
Information142 Gigaflops
Link to Manufacturer Page


3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 800x600
med. 1360x768
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
45.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 800x600
58.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
31.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.


low 800x600
51.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
35  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

low 1024x768
ultra 1280x1024
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

low 640x480
71.6  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

med. 1024x768
26.4  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
17.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

low 800x600
83  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
40 50 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
25 26 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
log 08. 03:00:01

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Feb 2023 15:10:53 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.058s ... 0.059s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.059s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.059s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 1600 +0.012s ... 0.072s

#7 got single benchmarks 1600 +0.017s ... 0.088s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.088s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.157s ... 0.245s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.245s

#11 Got 27 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.248s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.248s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.254s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.156s ... 0.41s

#15 return log +0.048s ... 0.458s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M graphics card


Review MSI FX600 Notebook

Quadrophony. The new all-rounder series is technologically on the cutting edge with an i5 CPU and should also cope with games. A real novelty is the sound syste...
Intel Core i5-450M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M | 15.60" | 2.5 kg

Review Asus N61JV-JX007V Notebook

Impaired Optimus. Nvidia's newest switchable technology amongst graphic cards stands for best runtimes in powerful mainstream notebooks. The following review ex...
Intel Core i5-430M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M | 16.00" | 2.7 kg

Review Asus N71JV Notebook

Sound Machine. The slim 17.3 incher addresses fans of good performance and good music. Asus achieves the unexpected in terms of acoustics. A subwoofer and stere...
Intel Core i5-430M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M | 17.30" | 3.2 kg

Asus N61JV-JX361V: Intel Core i3-370M, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Asus N61JV-JX361V

MSI FX600-211PL: Intel Core i5-460M, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI FX600-211PL

Asus N73JN-TY035V: Intel Core i5-520M, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N73JN-TY035V

MSI FX600-007UK: Intel Core i3-330M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » MSI FX600-007UK

MSI FX600-i3343W7P: Intel Core i3-330M, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI FX600-i3343W7P

MSI FX600-062FR: Intel Core i5-450M, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI FX600-062FR

MSI FX600-i5447W7P: Intel Core i5-450M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » MSI FX600-i5447W7P

Asus N61JV-JX007V: Intel Core i5-430M, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N61JV-JX007

Asus N61J-X2: Intel Core i5-430M, 16.00", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Asus N61J-X2

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics Xe 24EUs *

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2016-01-26)