Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 Mobile is a professional workstation graphics card for laptops. It is based on the consumer Radeon RX 540 and therefore uses the same Polaris 12 chip (unverified). The exact clock speeds of the mobile version are not published, the desktop version however, seems to feature similar clock speeds as the RX 540. The graphics memory however seems to be identical, as its also specified with 96 GB/s throughput.

The AMD Radeon Pro (formerly known as FirePro) is the counterpart to the Quadro series from Nvidia and offers certified drivers for professional 3D applications (CAD and DCC).

For more information on the features and specifications of the Polaris architecture, visit our in depth article here.

CodenamePolaris 12
ArchitecturePolaris
Pipelines512 - unified
Memory Speed6000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL Vulkan
technology14 nm
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement21.03.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pageproducts.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1 pt (3%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2448     avg: 2481     median: 2480.5 (4%)     max: 2513 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2644     avg: 2671     median: 2671 (2%)     max: 2698 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 47354     avg: 47447     median: 47447 (5%)     max: 47540 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
918 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
820 Points (2%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
176357 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
45475 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 11601     avg: 11888     median: 11887.5 (11%)     max: 12174 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 17922     avg: 18522     median: 18522 (5%)     max: 19122 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3993     avg: 4058     median: 4058 (5%)     max: 4123 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 3632     avg: 3691     median: 3690.5 (3%)     max: 3749 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
11702 Points (3%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
10150 Points (6%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
18186 Points (24%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 9.4     avg: 10.1     median: 10.1 (3%)     max: 10.8 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
36.8 fps (7%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 24.88     avg: 25.1     median: 25.1 (15%)     max: 25.26 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 20.1     avg: 20.4     median: 20.4 (12%)     max: 20.7 fps
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 46.79     avg: 47.3     median: 47.3 (36%)     max: 47.82 fps
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 7.66     avg: 7.7     median: 7.7 (9%)     max: 7.69 fps
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 45.64     avg: 46.2     median: 46.2 (35%)     max: 46.83 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 64.7     avg: 64.8     median: 64.8 (69%)     max: 64.8 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 18.01     avg: 18.3     median: 18.3 (9%)     max: 18.55 fps
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 33.99     avg: 36     median: 36 (19%)     max: 38.01 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 26.11     avg: 28.7     median: 28.7 (7%)     max: 31.31 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 14.27     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (2%)     max: 18.74 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 5.19     avg: 6.2     median: 6.2 (1%)     max: 7.28 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 3.71     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (1%)     max: 3.99 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 9.22     avg: 10.5     median: 10.5 (3%)     max: 11.75 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 0.26     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (0%)     max: 0.31 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 17.12     avg: 18     median: 18 (7%)     max: 18.82 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 15.05     avg: 16.1     median: 16.1 (3%)     max: 17.1 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
31.3 fps (5%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 8307     avg: 8487     median: 8486.5 (6%)     max: 8666 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 75.3     avg: 76.7     median: 76.7 (25%)     max: 78.1 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 74.2     avg: 75.4     median: 75.4 (4%)     max: 76.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 386     avg: 469     median: 469 (2%)     max: 552 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 747     avg: 922     median: 921.5 (2%)     max: 1096 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2414 points (2%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 46     avg: 47     median: 47 (10%)     max: 48 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra
min: 0.1385     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (13%)     max: 0.1478 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 34.2     avg: 35.4     median: 35.4 (51%)     max: 36.5 dB(A)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
65  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
84.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
28  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
71.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
25.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
37.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
73  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
51.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
31.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
30.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
37.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
30  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
50.4 50.4 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.1 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.8 15.3 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
26.8 48.2 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.7 29 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.7 15.4 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.7 6.8 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
154.8 160.7 ~ 158 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
74.7 76.6 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
47 68.2 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.7 23.4 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Star Wars Battlefront 26523.1
Call of Duty WWII84.645.524.8
Assassin´s Creed Origins28119
F1 201760212113
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III71.822.41
Ghost Recon Wildlands25.410.49.18.1
For Honor37.814.911.59.2
Civilization 67351.118.2
Deus Ex Mankind Divided31.215.68.43.2
Doom30.515.6
The Division37.320.49.2
Far Cry Primal3011107
Rise of the Tomb Raider50301512.2
The Witcher 33823127
BioShock Infinite158765819
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
7
5
1
11
3
1
11
1

8








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.34
log 01. 12:18:40

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Nov 2025 05:35:47 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.032s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.032s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8760 +0.032s ... 0.064s

#8 got single benchmarks 8760 +0.015s ... 0.078s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.078s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.943s ... 1.022s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.022s

#12 Got 61 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 1.029s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.029s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.009s ... 1.038s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.108s ... 1.146s

#16 return log +0.004s ... 1.15s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *
Arc B 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Class 3

UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2018-02-14)