Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M is a upper mid-range DirectX 11-compatible graphics card for laptops. In contrast to the GTX 660M, the 760M now uses the GK106 chip and offers twice the amount of shaders at a slightly reduced core speed. However, the memory bus is still only 128 Bit wide.

As a novelty, the GeForce 700M series implements GPU Boost 2.0 to automatically overclock the core clock rate. Depending on the cooling headroom of the laptop and the application / game, up to 15 % performance gains are possible.

Architecture
The Kepler architecture is the successor to the Fermi architecture that first appeared in laptops with the GeForce 400M series. The GK106 Kepler core offers five shader blocks, called SMX, that are clocked at the same speed as the central core. In the GTX 760M, four blocks are active for a total of 768 CUDA cores. Although the Kepler architecture can utilize more shader cores than a Fermi chip, its shaders can be up to twice as power efficient.  However, due to the missing hot clock of the shader domain, two shaders of a Kepler chip are of similar speed to one shader of a Fermi chip (as the latter is clocked twice as fast).
PCIe 3.0 is now supported by the mobile Kepler series and an optional Turbo mode can automatically overclock the Nvidia card by a theoretical 15 percent if the laptop cooling system allows it. The implementation of this boost mode is done in the BIOS, but it is ultimately dependent upon the manufacturer of the laptop.

Performance
The graphics performance of the GeForce GTX 760M is clearly above the GTX 660M thanks to the higher amount of shaders. Depending on the GPU Boost 2.0 up to 30 % better performance can be achieved (according to Nvidia).

In our tests with a quad-core of the Haswell generation, the GTX 760M performs on par with a GTX 670M or Radeon HD 8870M. In demanding games like Crysis 3, BioShock Infinite or Hitman: Absolution the GTX760M is able to achieve good framerates in high details and 1366x768 pixels. Less demanding games like Dead Space 3, Modern Warfare 3 or Deus Ex Human Revolution were even playable in Full HD and maximum details.

Features
The feature set of the GTX760M is identical to the GTX670MX as both are based on the same GK106 core. Therefore the GPU supports up to 4 active displays. Furthermore, high resolution monitors of up to 3840x2160 pixels can now be connected using DisplayPort 1.2 or HDMI 1.4a if available. HD-Audio codecs, such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD, can be transmitted via bitstream mode through the HDMI port. However, as most laptops will feature Optimus, the integrated GPU will likely have direct control over the display ports and may limit the feature set available by the Nvidia Kepler cards.

The 5th generation PureVideo HD video processor (VP5) is also integrated in the GK104 core and offers hardware decoding of HD videos. Common codecs such as MPEG-1/2, MPEG-4 ASP, H.264 and VC1/WMV9 are fully supported up to 4K resolutions while VC1 and MPEG-4 are supported up to 1080p. Two streams can be decoded in parallel for features such as Picture-in-Picture. Finally, the dedicated video encoding engine called NVENC API similar to Intel QuickSync is integrated in the chip.

The power consumption of the GeForce GTX 760M should be similar to the GTX 660M (50W) and is therefore best suited for large notebooks (15-inches or greater) and desktop replacements.

GeForce GTX 700M Series

GeForce GTX 780M SLI compare 3072 @ 0.82 GHz2x 256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 770M SLI compare 1920 @ 0.81 GHz2x 192 Bit @ 4000 MHz
GeForce GTX 780M compare 1536 @ 0.82 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 765M SLI compare 1536 @ 0.85 GHz2x 128 Bit @ 4000 MHz
GeForce GTX 775M compare 1344 @ 0.72 GHz256 Bit @ 3600 MHz
GeForce GTX 770M compare 960 @ 0.81 GHz192 Bit @ 4000 MHz
GeForce GTX 765M compare 768 @ 0.85 GHz128 Bit @ 4000 MHz
GeForce GTX 760M 768 @ 0.66 GHz128 Bit @ 4000 MHz
CodenameN14E-GL
ArchitectureKepler
Pipelines768 - unified
Core Speed657 MHz
Memory Speed4000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.3
Power Consumption45-50 Watt
Transistor Count2.5 Billion
technology28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, SLI, PhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, 3D Vision, 3DTV Play
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement30.05.2013

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1 pt (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1971     avg: 2146     median: 2172.5 (4%)     max: 2319 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2060     avg: 2254     median: 2271 (3%)     max: 2395 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 74223     avg: 104995     median: 114082 (14%)     max: 118662 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 11757     avg: 12290     median: 12477 (7%)     max: 12869 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 18014     avg: 18819     median: 19221 (25%)     max: 19221 Points
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 3.18     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (2%)     max: 3.48 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
specvp11 sw-02 +
specvp11 proe-05 +
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 11.07     avg: 12.9     median: 12.9 (10%)     max: 14.72 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 18.3     avg: 19     median: 19 (20%)     max: 19.77 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 31.31     avg: 32.5     median: 32.5 (16%)     max: 33.72 fps
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 9.59     avg: 10.4     median: 10.4 (5%)     max: 11.15 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
57.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
32  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
30  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
78.5 83.4 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
59 72.4 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
37.2 41.2 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.8 20.5 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
96.1 105.6 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
65.8 71.6 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46.4 47.1 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.7 18.9 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
high 1366x768
67  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
low 1024x768
119  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
111  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
102 108 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
64 64 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
low 1024x768
489.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
373.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
342.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
247  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
162.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
117.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
93.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
79.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
69.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
38.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
107.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
65.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
39.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
96.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
82.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
37.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
109.4 119.2 ~ 114 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
90.2 95.4 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.1 58.2 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
35.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
149.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
95.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
86.9 102.4 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
63  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
49.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
140  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
82  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
70  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
high 1366x768
87.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
SimCity

SimCity

2013
med. 1366x768
45  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
34  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1366x768
99  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
65 66.2 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.6 29.2 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
med. 1366x768
49  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
34  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1366x768
135  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
103  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
61  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 3

Far Cry 3

2012
low 1024x768
82.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
35.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
high 1366x768
64.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
57  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
53  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
31  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
106.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
87.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
57.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
59.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
43.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1366x768
76  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
59  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
123  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
122  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
114  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fifa 13

Fifa 13

2012
med. 1366x768
282  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
292  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
202  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2012

F1 2012

2012
low 1024x768
137  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
100  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
91  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1366x768
105  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
96  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
81.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
55.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1366x768
230  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
171  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
98  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1366x768
80  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
131 133 ~ 132 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
99 107.4 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46 50.3 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12 12.5 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
high 1366x768
73  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
59.6 103.1 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.9 82.6 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23.2 78.6 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1366x768
168  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
152  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
94  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1366x768
48.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Alan Wake

Alan Wake

2012
low 1024x768
76  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
60 159.5 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
59 80.7 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
49 66.4 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.7 30 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1366x768
78  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
57  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1366x768
130  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
113  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1366x768
69  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
56  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
high 1366x768
80  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
225  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
86  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
med. 1024x768
144  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
117  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
72  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41  fps    + Compare
high 1600x900
31  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
med. 1280x720
72  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
CPU 1280x1024
28
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
125.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
100.8  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
85.4 90.4 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52 55.6 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1360x768
130  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
100  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 800x600
151.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
82 118.9 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
high 1600x900
40 53.1 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13 17.3 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
150  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
117  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
90  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
high 1360x768
108.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
80  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
ultra 1920x1080
73.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
high 1024x768
81.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
high 1024x768
70.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
ultra 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Assassin´s Creed IV: Black Flag57.150.53216.4
Need for Speed: Rivals30303029.3
Call of Duty: Ghosts81663920
Battlefield 4101694719
Batman: Arkham Origins6732
F1 201311911110564
Fifa 14489.3373.8342.2247
Total War: Rome II162.6117.993.914.4
Saints Row IV79.769.938.324.3
The Bureau: XCOM Declassified107.165.339.228.4
Splinter Cell: Blacklist96.882.137.617.1
Dota 21149351
Company of Heroes 235.229.221.5
GRID 2149.595.69531.4
Metro: Last Light6349.3330.33
BioShock Infinite140827020
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm87.836.1
SimCity453422
Tomb Raider996628
Crysis 3493413
Dead Space 313510361
Far Cry 382.560.335.8
Assassin´s Creed III64.621.4
Hitman: Absolution57533111
Call of Duty: Black Ops 2106.187.457.6
Need for Speed: Most Wanted6059.243.2
Medal of Honor: Warfighter765932
Dishonored12312211466
Fifa 13282292202
F1 201213710091
Borderlands 21059645
Torchlight 257.931
Guild Wars 281.155.7
Counter-Strike: GO23017198
Darksiders II8050
Sleeping Dogs1321034812
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier62.327.2
Max Payne 37340
Dirt Showdown81555130.1
Diablo III16815294
Risen 2: Dark Waters48.523.7
Mass Effect 36054
Alan Wake764523
Anno 2070110705829
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim785733
CoD: Modern Warfare 313011373
Battlefield 36956
Batman: Arkham City8040
Deus Ex Human Revolution2258644
Dirt 314411738
The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings72413110
Total War: Shogun 27227
Mafia 2125.5100.88854
StarCraft 213010062
Metro 2033151.51004715
Battlefield: Bad Company 21501179046
Resident Evil 5108.280
Trackmania Nations Forever73.3
Crysis - GPU Benchmark81.223.5
Crysis - CPU Benchmark70.821.1
World of Warcraft43
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

4
17
11
2
11
25
9
1
24
24
4
23
18
9
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 19:36:50

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 04 Mar 2024 05:34:43 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.051s ... 0.052s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.052s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.052s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4584 +0.034s ... 0.086s

#7 got single benchmarks 4584 +0.027s ... 0.113s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.113s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.5s ... 0.613s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.613s

#11 Got 216 rows for game benchmarks. +0.017s ... 0.63s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.63s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.037s ... 0.667s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.635s ... 2.302s

#15 return log +0.044s ... 2.346s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M graphics card

Review Update Asus N56JR-S4080H Notebook

Review Update Asus N56JR-S4080H Notebook

Premium gaming device. The Asus N56JR is no cheap machine. Shipping with an Haswell Core i7 CPU, a GeForce GTX 760M, a Full HD display, metal surfaces, a backli...
Intel Core i7-4700HQ | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | 15.60" | 2.7 kg
 

Review MSI GE40-i760M2811 Notebook

Little powerhouse. MSI takes a lot of risk with their GE40. Lightning-fast high-end hardware from Intel and Nvidia come in a compact and comfortably lightweight...
Intel Core i7-4702MQ | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | 14.00" | 1.9 kg
 

Review Gigabyte P34G Notebook

Bold concept. It is almost insane to put a GeForce GTX 760M into a thin 14-inch notebook, but Gigabyte does it anyway and the result is surprisingly good. Read ...
Intel Core i7-4700HQ | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | 14.00" | 1.8 kg
 

Review DevilTech Fire DT14 Notebook

To be handled with kid gloves. DevilTech combines high-tech components with a plastic chassis. The cutting-edge Intel Haswell CPU and a GTX 760M are supposed to...
Intel Core i7-4702MQ | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | 14.10" | 2 kg
 

Review Acer Aspire V3-772G-747A321 Notebook

Haswell rocket. A monster in every respect: 32 GB memory, 1256 GB storage (+ expandability) and a Full HD display. Acer's 17-inch device with a brand-new quad-c...
Intel Core i7-4702MQ | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | 17.30" | 3.2 kg

Asus N56JR-CN181H: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N56JR-CN181H

Asus G56JR-CN212H: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus G56JR-CN212H

Acer Aspire V3-772G-9460: Intel Core i7-4702MQ, 17.30", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-772G-9460

Asus G56JR-CN141: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus G56JR-CN141

Acer Aspire V3-772G NX.M8UEX.017: Intel Core i5-4200M, 17.30", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-772G NX.M8UEX.017

Acer Aspire V3-772G-9656: Intel Core i7-4702MQ, 17.30", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-772G-9656

Asus N56JR-S4029H: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N56JR-S4029H

Asus N56JR-S4010D: Intel Core i7-4700MQ, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N56JR-S4010D

Gigabyte P34G: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte P34G

Acer Aspire V3-772G-747a4G75Makk: Intel Core i7-4702MQ, 17.30", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-772G-747a4G75Makk

Acer Aspire V3-772G-9402: Intel Core i7-4702MQ, 17.30", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-772G-9402

Acer Aspire V3-772G-747A8G1TBDWAKK: Intel Core i7-4702MQ, 17.30", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-772G-747A8G1TBDWAKK

Acer Aspire V3-772G-747a161: Intel Core i7-4702MQ, 17.30", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-772G-747a161

MSI GE40-2OC-015XPL: Intel Core i7-4702MQ, 14.00", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI GE40-2OC-015XPL

MSI GE40-2OC-009US: Intel Core i7-4700MQ, 14.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GE40-2OC-009US

Acer Aspire V3-772G-747A321: Intel Core i7-4702MQ, 17.30", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-772G-747A321

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter