Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 820M

AMD Radeon 820M

The AMD Radeon 820M is a low power integrated graphics card in Strix Point / Krackan Point APUs. It is based on the current RDNA 3+ architecture and was introduced at the beginning of 2025. The 820M offers 2 of the 16 compute units (CUs, 128 unified shaders) with up to 2,800 MHz. Like the 700M iGPUs, the 800M series supports up to 4 monitors with resolutions up to SUHD 4230p60.

The gaming performance should be significantly below the Radeon 840M and therefore only suitable for a few undemanding games.

The AMD Radeon 820M is integrated in the SoC and is therefore also manufactured at TSMC using the modern 4nm process.

AMD Radeon 800M Series

Radeon 890M compare 1024 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 880M compare 768 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 860M compare 512 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 840M compare 256 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 820M 128 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
CodenameKrackan Point
ArchitectureRDNA 3+
Pipelines128 - unified
Raytracing Cores2
Core Speed2900 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7500 MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_2
technology4 nm
PCIe4
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesFreeSync, Miracast, SUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VP9/AV1 encoding and decoding
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.06.2024
PredecessorRadeon 740M
CPU in Radeon 820MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen AI 5 3304 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz2800 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1.2 pt (4%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
2981 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
3155 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
187329 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
900 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
786 Points (2%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
17905 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
22769 Points (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
4284 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
3913 Points (3%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
13640 Points (4%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
11278 Points (6%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
23777 Points (31%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
103.7 fps (6%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
7.4 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
20.4 fps (4%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
67.3 fps (5%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
104.6 fps (3%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
6416 points (2%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
10797 points (3%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
218 Samples/s (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
465 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2568 points (2%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
36.8 Watt (5%)
0510152025303540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
43 Watt (12%)
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
40.4 Watt (5%)
05101520253035404550Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
5.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
4.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
4.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
3.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
2.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1920x1080
4.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
3.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
3.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
10.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
low 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
4.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
3.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
5.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
7.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
5.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
5.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080 cinem.
3.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
3.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
3.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
5.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
4.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
3.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
9.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
5.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
4.8
low 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
75.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
38.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
31  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
130  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
91.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
130.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
107.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
ARC Raiders19.49.856.54
The Outer Worlds 28.145.234.05
Battlefield 610.67.856.22
Borderlands 44.073.42.29
F1 25231711
Doom: The Dark Ages
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered4.573.683.2
Assassin's Creed Shadows653
Kingdom Come Deliverance 210.87.856.39
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle
Stalker 25.834.93.68
Until Dawn16.69.525.88
Space Marine 27.55.875.55
Star Wars Outlaws3.933.883.1
Senua's Saga Hellblade 25.474.63.21
Ghost of Tsushima9.157.356.7
Horizon Forbidden West10.28.065.54
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty12.99.47.66.4
Baldur's Gate 313.310.26.996.91
Strange Brigade75.92720.117.3
X-Plane 11.1138.526.924
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark3113.710
Dota 2 Reborn13091.145.240.4
GTA V130.3107.522.58.85
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
17
2
1
2
20

2
21
1

4
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 28. 14:56:43

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Nov 2025 05:38:56 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.032s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.032s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13109 +0.03s ... 0.062s

#8 got single benchmarks 13109 +0.011s ... 0.073s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.073s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.619s ... 0.692s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.692s

#12 Got 76 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.7s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.7s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.014s ... 0.715s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.136s ... 0.851s

#16 return log +0.004s ... 0.855s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-07-16)