The performance depends on the used graphics memory. The DDR3 version was slightly slower than an average GeForce 930M in our tests (and definitely faster than the GeForce 920M). The GDDR5 version could therefore best the 930M slightly. However, both versions are not suited for demanding games of 2017. Less demanding games, like The Sims 4, should be playable in medium to high settings (see below for benchmarks).
Thanks to the low power consumption, the GeForce 920MX is also suited for thin and light laptops.
GeForce 900M Series |
| Codename | N16V-GMR |
| Architecture | Maxwell |
| Pipelines | 256 - unified |
| Core Speed | 965 - 993 (Boost) MHz |
| Memory Speed | 1800 MHz |
| Memory Bus Width | 64 Bit |
| Memory Type | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Shared Memory | no |
| API | DirectX 12, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 |
| technology | 28 nm |
| Features | Optimus, PhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, 3D Vision, 3DTV Play, GameWorks |
| Date of Announcement | 25.03.2015 |
| Link to Manufacturer Page | www.geforce.com |
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 98596 avg: 110110 median: 110110 (11%) max: 121624 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 49876 avg: 57473 median: 57473 (7%) max: 65070 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 5744 avg: 6545 median: 6545 (6%) max: 7346 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 7733 avg: 9114 median: 9113.5 (2%) max: 10494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1154 avg: 1337 median: 1336.5 (2%) max: 1519 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1282 avg: 1448 median: 1448 (2%) max: 1614 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 73997 avg: 83643 median: 83642.5 (9%) max: 93288 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1800 avg: 1993 median: 1983 (3%) max: 2200 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1747 avg: 1823 median: 1835 (2%) max: 1887 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total +3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 6584 avg: 7408 median: 7407.5 (2%) max: 8231 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 5850 avg: 6665 median: 6665 (4%) max: 7480 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
3DMark 06
min: 10781 avg: 12206 median: 12205.5 (16%) max: 13630 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 26.4 avg: 27.9 median: 27.9 (5%) max: 29.4 fps
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2632 avg: 4406 median: 4366 (3%) max: 6219 points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 36.81 avg: 47.1 median: 47.7 (3%) max: 56.9 fps
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 29.9 avg: 32.7 median: 32.7 (3%) max: 35.4 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 42.8 avg: 47.4 median: 47.4 (1%) max: 52 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 55.7 avg: 62.9 median: 62.9 (3%) max: 70 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 103.1 avg: 115.2 median: 115.2 (1%) max: 127.3 fps
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 210 avg: 230 median: 230 (1%) max: 250 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 400 avg: 427 median: 427 (1%) max: 454 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 1066 avg: 1139 median: 1139 (1%) max: 1212 points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
