Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M is a DirectX 11 graphics card of the middle class. It is based on the Kepler architecture and manufactured by TSMC in a 28-nanometer process. The GK107 chip (384 shaders) is clocked at up to 967 MHz plus boost and has a 128 bit memory interface (mostly DDR3, but GDDR5 also possible).

Architecture

The GK107 Kepler core offers two shader blocks, called SMX, each with 192 shaders for a total of 384 shader cores that are clocked at the same speed as the processor core. Although more shader cores are available in the Kepler architecture as compared to the Fermi design, the Kepler shaders are expected to be up to two times more power efficient. However, due to the missing hot clock of the shader domain, two shaders of a Kepler chip are as fast as one shader of a Fermi chip, even though Fermi shaders are clocked at twice the speed.

PCIe 3.0 is now supported by the mobile Kepler series and GPU Boost 2.0 can automatically overclock the card if the laptop cooling system allows it. This feature is available on any notebook with a graphics card of the 700M series.

Performance

Depending on clock speed, the GT 750M with DDR3 memory is about 10 - 15 percent faster than the GT 650M. The very rare GDDR5 version even beats the GTX 660M. Most current games (as of 2013) can be played fluently in high settings. In older titles, there are also reserves for additional quality features like AA and AF. Detailed benchmarks can be found further down on this page.

Features

The feature set includes support for up to 4 active displays. Furthermore, high resolution monitors of up to 3840x2160 pixels can now be connected using DisplayPort 1.2 or HDMI 1.4a if available. HD-Audio codecs, such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD, can be transmitted via bitstream mode through the HDMI port. However, as most laptops will feature Optimus, the integrated GPU will likely have direct control over the display ports and may limit the feature set available by the Nvidia Kepler cards.

The 5th generation PureVideo HD video processor (VP5), also integrated in the GK107 core, offers hardware decoding of HD videos. Common codecs such as MPEG-1/2, MPEG-4 ASP, H.264 and VC1/WMV9 are fully supported up to 4K resolutions while VC1 and MPEG-4 are supported up to 1080p. Two streams can be decoded in parallel for features such as Picture-in-Picture. Another feature is the inclusion of a dedicated video encoding engine similar to Intel QuickSync that can be accessed via the NVENCI API.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the GeForce GT 750M should be somewhere between the GT 650M and GTX 660M (about 35 - 40 watts). As a result, the Nvidia GPU is best suited for notebooks 15 inches in size or greater.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GT 700M Series
GeForce GT 755M SLI compare 768 @ 0.98 GHz2x 128 Bit @ 5400 MHz
GeForce GT 750M SLI compare 768 @ 0.97 GHz2x 128 Bit @ 2000 - 5000 MHz
GeForce GT 755M compare 384 @ 0.98 GHz128 Bit @ 5400 MHz
GeForce GT 750M 384 @ 0.97 GHz128 Bit @ 2000 - 5000 MHz
GeForce GT 745M compare 384 @ 0.84 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce GT 740M compare 384 @ 0.81 - 0.98 GHz64/128 Bit @ 1600 - 1800 MHz
GeForce GT 735M compare 384 @ 0.58 - 0.89 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 - 2000 MHz
GeForce GT 730M compare 384 @ 0.73 GHz64/128 Bit @ 1800 - 2000 MHz
GeForce GT 720M compare 96 @ 0.63 - 0.94 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 - 2000 MHz
CodenameN14P-GT
ArchitectureKepler
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed967 MHz
Memory Speed2000 - 5000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3, GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Transistor Count1300 Million
technology28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, GPU Boost 2.0, PhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, 3D Vision, 3DTV Play
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement01.04.2013

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
8 pt (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 37930     avg: 39480     median: 39479.5 (5%)     max: 41029 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 5766     avg: 8102     median: 8632 (11%)     max: 10521 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 9574     avg: 11289     median: 10822 (5%)     max: 13691 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1377     avg: 1609     median: 1508 (4%)     max: 2049 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1483     avg: 1700     median: 1574 (3%)     max: 2141 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 44212     avg: 71771     median: 78855 (11%)     max: 92036 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2419     avg: 2649     median: 2655 (7%)     max: 2974 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2351     avg: 2549     median: 2543 (4%)     max: 2736 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
30.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Off 1920x1080
15.5
low 1280x720
25.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Off 4xAF 1920x1080
13
low 1280x720
29.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1920x1080
12.8
low 1280x720
29  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
16
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
31.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TrilinearAF 1920x1080
15
low 1024x768
27.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
66.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
34.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
55.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
26.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
low 1280x720
31.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
42.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
42.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
143.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
77.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
59.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
59.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
39.3  fps    + Compare