Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 829

Qualcomm Adreno 829

The Qualcomm Adreno 829 is an integrated graphics unit in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 SoC for smartphones. The graphics unit clocks at up to 1225 MHz and offers 2 MB of cache. Compared to the Adreno 840the 829 only offers two clusters and significantly less cache (according to Geekerwan).

According to Qualcomm, the GPU is 11% faster than the previous generation (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3?).

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 3nm process at TSMC.

Adreno 800 Series

Adreno 850 compare 3 @ 1.45 GHz
Adreno 840 compare @ 1.2 GHz
Adreno 830 compare 1536 @ 1.1 GHz
Adreno 829 @ 1.23 GHz
Adreno 840 V Series compare @ 1.2 GHz
Adreno 825 compare
Adreno 812 compare
Adreno 810 compare @ 1.05 GHz
Core Speed1225 (Boost) MHz
Memory TypeLPDDR5x
Shared Memoryyes
Man. Technology3 nm
Displays3 Displays (max.)
Date of Announcement05.02.2026

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 1009     avg: 1893     median: 2085.5 (5%)     max: 2100 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 21073     avg: 21281     median: 21239.5 (11%)     max: 21522 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 4869     avg: 5318     median: 5478.5 (6%)     max: 5623 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 8993     avg: 9508     median: 9657 (4%)     max: 9725 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
927 Points (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 34     avg: 41.8     median: 43.5 (16%)     max: 44 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 74     avg: 96.2     median: 99 (18%)     max: 107 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 171     avg: 223     median: 233 (17%)     max: 244 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 141     avg: 159.7     median: 167 (16%)     max: 171 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 212     avg: 264.3     median: 283 (6%)     max: 298 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 316     avg: 357.7     median: 359 (15%)     max: 398 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 503     avg: 616     median: 662 (5%)     max: 684 fps
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
888106 Points (61%)
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU OpenCL
min: 17378     avg: 17641     median: 17394 (4%)     max: 18150 points
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU Vulkan
min: 20562     avg: 21087     median: 21098 (5%)     max: 21602 points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 11     avg: 12.9     median: 11.5 (4%)     max: 16.1 Watt
01234567891011121314151617Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Amazon Logo
  • $585.99
    ASUS Vivobook 14 Laptop, 14” WUXGA 60Hz Display, Qualcomm Snapdragon X, Qualcomm Adreno GPU, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD, Windows 11, Cool Silver, X1407QA-BS56

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 30. 21:25:24

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 29 Oct 2026 10:14:12 +0100 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.023s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.023s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13407 +0.015s ... 0.037s

#8 got single benchmarks 13407 +0.014s ... 0.051s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.192s ... 0.243s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.244s

#12 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.245s

#13 return log +0.496s ... 0.742s

Notebook reviews with Qualcomm Adreno 829 graphics card

Review: Motorola Edge 70 Max

Motorola Edge 70 Max smartphone review – Record-breaking battery life and flagship features at a low price

Samsung's and Apple's top phones struggle to compete with the Motorola Edge 70 Max when it comes to battery life: It is designed uncompromisingly around a huge battery, yet doesn't feel bulky as a result and is now available at a fairly low price. But are there any drawbacks?
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 6.82", 221 g
Motorola Razr Fold Review

Is Motorola’s book-style phone debut so successful that Samsung has reason to worry? – Razr Fold Smartphone Review

The Razr Fold is Motorola’s first classic foldable. It offers compelling features: a powerful camera system, plenty of performance, great sound, and, above all, bright screens. That sounds like a successful debut, but are there any issues?
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 8.1", 243 g
Vivo X300 FE Review

The mini version of one of the best camera smartphones saves a lot of money – Vivo X300 FE Smartphone Review

The handy Vivo X300 FE costs half as much as the Ultra model and cuts corners in all the right places: The battery is barely smaller, some cameras are more light-sensitive, and when it comes to performance, the phone can handle almost anything. Is Vivo producing the strongest competitor to its top-of-the-line model?
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 6.31", 190.2 g
Oppo Pad Mini Review

Ultra-light OLED tablet is miles ahead of the competition - Oppo Pad Mini Review

It doesn't always have to be a revolution—sometimes all it takes is building a tablet that does just about everything better than the competition. With the Pad Mini, Oppo elevates the compact category to a whole new level, pairing premium specs with a fast OLED display and an extra-long battery life.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 8.8", 279 g
Honor MagicPad 4 tablet  review

A mega-tablet with a 12.3-inch OLED screen and a no-brainer price – Honor MagicPad 4 review

A speedy Android tablet with a large and super-bright OLED display and top-notch features for under £600? The comparatively inexpensive MagicPad4 offers excellent value for money in the mid-range segment and manages to make the iPad competition seem truly overpriced.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 12.3", 450 g

Motorola Signature: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Signature review: DxO award-winning attack on Apple and Samsung

Motorola Edge 70 Max: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 6.82", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Edge 70 Max - Reviews and Specs

Oppo Pad Mini: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 8.80", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Oppo Pad Mini

Vivo X300 FE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 6.31", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X300 FE

Motorola Razr Fold: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 8.10", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Razr Fold

Honor MagicPad 4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 12.30", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicPad 4

Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 6.59", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo

Motorola Signature: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Signature

Vivo S50 Pro Mini: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 6.31", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo S50 Pro Mini

OnePlus Ace 6T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 6.83", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus Ace 6T

Motorola Edge 70 Max: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 6.82", 0.2 kg
   » Phone made of aircraft-grade aluminum currently costs less than US$ 650

   » New Motorola phone with outstanding battery life gives Galaxy S a run for its money

   » Trouble with phone updates yet again: Motorola leaves us shaking our heads

Motorola Razr Fold: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 8.10", 0.2 kg
   » Camera test of Motorola’s first full-size foldable —Is it as good as DxOMark says?

   » A nightmare for your eyes? Here’s how much the Motorola Razr Fold’s display actually flickers

   » Foldable smartphone US$ 500 cheaper—Is Motorola’s Razr Fold worth it?

   » Motorola Razr Fold clearly beats Samsung when it comes to battery life

   » Motorola’s first full-size foldable is making the competition nervous

Vivo X300 FE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 6.31", 0.2 kg
   » We tested one of the top camera competitors for high-end phones – and it's not even that expensive

   » Hardly anyone knows about this smartphone, which offers outstanding value for the price

   » Vivo X300 Ultra demystified: Cheaper models perform almost as well in our Camera Comparison

   » Under US$ 1,100: Clever cost-cutting of the Vivo X300 FE is giving high-end phones a hard time

   » Tough competition for the Galaxy S26: This compact phone impresses with its cameras and battery life

Oppo Pad Mini: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 8.80", 0.3 kg
   » Even the excellent Oppo Pad Mini can't overcome weaknesses of compact tablets

   » Huge blow to Apple’s iPad Mini: This OLED tablet beats it across the board

   » The best tablet in its class is inexplicably held back | Oppo Pad Mini

   » OLED fans have been waiting more than a decade for this tablet

Honor MagicPad 4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 12.30", 0.5 kg
   » Best mid-range tablet runs simultaneously with Android and Linux in review

   » iPad Air 13 looks like an entry-level tablet compared to the OLED screen of the MagicPad 4

   » We used one of the best Android tablets as a notebook replacement in 2026

   » Seldom does a tablet in our review make such a strong case as a top pick and an iPad alternative

   » Honor's bang-for-the-buck OLED tablet has better speakers than even iPad Pro 13

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)