Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q design is a mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). Compared to the faster RTX 2000 GPUs (e.g. RTX 2060), the 1650 integrates no Raytracing or Tensor cores. Compared to the desktop version, the mobile and Max-Q versions use all 1024 shaders of the TU117 chip. It is designed for thin and light laptops and about 10-15% slower than a regular GTX 1650 for laptops (depending on the cooling capabilities). According to the specifications, the Max-Q variant clocks 20% slower for the base speed and 27% for the boost speed.

The performance should be slightly faster than the old GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.

Compared to the bigger Turing chips (like the TU116 of the GTX 1660 Ti and the RTX lineup), the TU117 does not include the new NVENC encoder but an older one similar to the one used in Pascal and Volta.

Nvidia specifies a power consumption of 35 Watt TGP (Total Graphics Power) and therefore 15 Watts lower than a normal (Max-P) 1650 for laptops. Therefore, the Max-Q variant is well suited for thin and light laptops. The TU117 chip is manufactured in 12nm FFN at TSMC.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1600 Series
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) (compare) 1536 @ 1500 - 1770 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) (compare) 1408 @ 1530 - 1785 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) (compare) 1536 @ 1455 - 1590 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) (compare) 1408 @ 1530 - 1785 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q (compare) 1536 @ 1140 - 1335 (Boost) MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop) (compare) 1024 @ 1530 - 1725 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) (compare) 1024 @ 1395 - 1560 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) (compare) 896 @ 1485 - 1665 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q 1024 @ 1020 - 1245 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1024 - unified
Core Speed1020 - 1245 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed8000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1
technology12 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement23.04.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.nvidia.com/en-gb/geforce/gam...

Benchmarks

3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 2859     avg: 3147     median: 3108 (22%)     max: 3494 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
min: 2836     avg: 3000     median: 3016 (21%)     max: 3238 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 17713     avg: 21576     median: 20883 (31%)     max: 29013 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 22113     avg: 42955     median: 47499 (25%)     max: 53981 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 6300     avg: 7045     median: 7103 (25%)     max: 7717 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 6985     avg: 7903     median: 7774 (19%)     max: 8618 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 40513     avg: 64817     median: 64817 (9%)     max: 89121 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 9381     avg: 10741     median: 10508.5 (30%)     max: 11966 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 10422     avg: 11296     median: 11430 (22%)     max: 12259 points
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 13 Solidworks (sw-04) +
Siemens NX (snx-03) +
Showcase (showcase-02) +
Medical (medical-02) +
Maya (maya-05) +
Creo (creo-02) +
Catia (catia-05) +
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra - Power Consumption *
min: 60     avg: 75.5     median: 74 (16%)     max: 96.1 Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2

2019
low 1280x720
56.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
57.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
67.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
94.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
92.4 98.2 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
65.9 67.3 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
51.7 53.4 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.3 36.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.5  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
63  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
150  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
118  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
115  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
114  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
86  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
120  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
127  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
83 84 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65 69 ~ 67 fps    + Compare