Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7, GTX 1650 Max-Q
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 3 scores (from 3 reviews)
Reviews for the Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7, GTX 1650 Max-Q
Source: The Verge
Archive.org versionThat said, there are reasons why someone might want Razer’s laptop instead. One is the built-in webcam. Another is the refined aesthetic, which is a hallmark of the Blade Stealth, including the chic colorful keyboard. And another is the form factor. At the end of the day, the Blade Stealth 13 is still the most portable gaming experience you can find. The G14 is a bit bigger and noticeably heavier. If you’d prefer to sacrifice some gaming performance in exchange for a laptop that’s exceptional in these areas, the Blade Stealth 13 is for you.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/28/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Ultrabook Review
Archive.org versionI really like this little laptop. If you are looking for something ultra-portable that plays games pretty well and you have the money to spend (and you don’t use the right shift key!), perhaps this Razer Blade Sealth 13 is the right model for you. On the other hand, this is expensive and has its quirks, that's why the Blade 15 remains the better value proposition if you're willing to opt for a slightly larger and heavier computer instead.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hardware Zone
Archive.org versionThe Razer Blade Stealth 13 is perhaps the only ultrabook today to offer what I'd consider decent gaming performance. If you travel a lot, but can't bear to be away from your games, the Blade Stealth 13 may just be what you need. However, Razer isn't quite the first to attempt to make an ultraportable gaming machine. For one, there was the old Alienware m11x, a puny 11.6-inch laptop with a GeForce GT 540M. It turned out pretty good gaming numbers as well, for its time that is, but it was also a rather thick and heavy system.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 65% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Comment
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q: Mid range dedicated graphics card for thin and light laptops based on the GTX 1650 but with reduced clock speeds and power consumption. Uses the Turing architecture (TU117 chip in 12nm FFN) but without Raytracing or Tensor cores.
Modern games should be playable with these graphics cards at low settings and resolutions. Casual gamers may be happy with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
i7-1065G7: Ice Lake-based quad-core processor for thin and light laptops. The four cores are clocked at 1.3 GHz to 3.9 GHz and should offer 18% more IPC (instructions per clock) than the previous generations (and therefore partly close the clock speed gap). Produced on first-gen 10 nm Intel process.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
