Notebookcheck

NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

The Nvidia Quadro M5000M is a high-end, DirectX 12 (FL_12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM204 chip with all 1536 shader cores activated and is manufactured in 28 nm at TSMC. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M. The Quadro M5000M is built for the Intel Skylake generation and is a successor to the Quadro K5100M (Kepler-based). The M5000M usually comes with 8 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective, 160 GB/s opposed to 115.2 GB/s of the K5100M). 

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

As the exact clock speed of the M5000M is still not known, we can only speculate on the performance of the card. However, it is the top model of the mobile Quadro line in 2015 and based on the same chip as the GeForce GTX 980M. Therefore, it should be clearly faster than the old Quadro K5100M.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.2) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M5000M can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M5000M is rated at the same TGP of 100 Watt as the K5100M (including the board and memory components). Therefore, the card is suited for large notebooks with 17-inch displays or greater.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 (compare) 2048 @ 1139 - 1140 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 962 - 1051 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M (compare) 1280 @ 975 - 1013 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M (compare) 1024 @ 1050 MHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 (compare) 1024 @ 694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 (compare) 640 @ 991 - 1150 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M (compare) 640 @ 1038 - 1197 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M (compare) 512 @ 993 - 1072 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 (compare) 512 @ 1018 MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M (compare) 384 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M (compare) 336 @ 475 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 (compare) 384 @ 756 - 1019 (Boost) MHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M (compare) 384 @ 837 - 876 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M (compare) 384 @ 1029 - 1124 (Boost) MHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M (compare) 320 @ 405 MHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M (compare) 240 @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M (compare) 192 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M (compare) 96 @ 700 MHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
ArchitectureMaxwell
Pipelines1536 - unified
Core Speed962 - 1051 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed5000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory8192 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0
Transistor Count5200 Million
technology28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement02.10.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-for-...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
38.5 pt (40%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
324161 Points (151%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
251633 Points (169%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 22786     avg: 23878.5     median: 23878.5 (130%)     max: 24971 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 61789     avg: 63738     median: 63738 (207%)     max: 65687 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 7979     avg: 8094.5     median: 8094.5 (192%)     max: 8210 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 9087     avg: 9227.5     median: 9227.5 (215%)     max: 9368 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 294222     avg: 309196     median: 309196 (155%)     max: 324170 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 10640     avg: 11028.7     median: 11110 (168%)     max: 11336 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 11820     avg: 11893.3     median: 11845 (184%)     max: 12015 points
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Extreme HD DirectX 1920x1080
min: 47.3     avg: 47.9     median: 47.9 (137%)     max: 48.4 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - DX 11, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
min: 108.6     avg: 112.3     median: 112.3 (208%)     max: 116 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - OpenGL, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
min: 101.5     avg: 102.8     median: 102.8 (199%)     max: 104 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
min: 147.6     avg: 155.3     median: 155.3 (178%)     max: 163 fps
SPECviewperf 11
Siemens NX 1920x1080 +
Tcvis 1920x1080 +
SolidWorks 1920x1080 +
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 +
Maya 1920x1080 +
Lightwave 1920x1080 +
Ensight 1920x1080 +
Catia 1920x1080 +
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 +
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 +
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 +
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 +
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 +
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 +
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 +
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
min: 1324     avg: 1327.5     median: 1327.5 (87%)     max: 1331 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 2167     avg: 2173     median: 2173 (140%)     max: 2179 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
6291 Points (177%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
193  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
179  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
82  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
155  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
123  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
67  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
386  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
160  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
126  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
121  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
121  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
122  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
120  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
135  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
116  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
167.8 216 ~ 192 fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
143.2 157 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
87.4 88 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63.6 68 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
368  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
190  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
155  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
106  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
97.6 118 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
92.3 111 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
89.4 104 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
61 80.5 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
373  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
299  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
235  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
53.4 66 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
52 66 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
51.4 65 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.4 35 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
176.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
145.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
134.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
102.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
127.5 154 ~ 141 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
125.3 151 ~ 138 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
104.3 122 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
60.8 66 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
289  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
228  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
212  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
92  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
406.8 537 ~ 472 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
319.6 352 ~ 336 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
227.9 240 ~ 234 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
74.4 107 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
83.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
75.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
67.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
211  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
202.7  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
171.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
158.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list: