Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU

NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU

The NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU or A5000 Mobile is a professional graphics card for mobile workstations. It is based on the GA104 Ampere chip and similar to the consumer GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU. It offers the same 6.144 graphics cores, 48 RT cores, 192 Tensor cores and 16 GB GDDR6 graphics memory with a 256 Bit memory bus. It supports PCIe 4.0 and will be available in different variants from 80 - 165 Watt (TGP) with different clock speeds (and performance). The GPU supports eDP 1.4b to connect the internal monitor and DisplayPort 1.4 and HDMI 2.1 for external connections.

There is no more Max-Q variant (formerly used for the low power variants) but every OEM can choose to implement Max-Q technologies (Dynamic Boost, Whispermode).

The raw performance should be similar to the GeForce RTX 3080 for laptops at the same TGP level. Both GPUs depend heavily on good cooling and a high TGP for good performance. At a similar power consumption level the RTX A5000 should be clearly faster than the old Quadro RTX 5000 and 5000 Max-Q. The desktop variant of the A5000 however, is a lot faster.

The GA104 chip offers 6,144 FP32 ALUs of which half can also execute INT32 instructions (i.e. 3,072 INT32 ALUs). With Turing all shaders could still execute FP32 or INT32 instructions. The raytracing and tensor cores on the chip were also improved according to Nvidia. The Ampere chips also include an improved 5th generation video encoder (NVENC for H.264 and H.265) and a 7th generation decoder (for various formats now including AV1).

The GA104 chip is manufactured by Samsung in 8nm (8N), which is not quite able to keep up with the 7nm node at TSMC (e.g. used by AMD and also for the professional GA100 Ampere chip).

RTX A Series

RTX A5500 Laptop GPU compare 7424 256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU compare 5888 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU 6144 @ 1.22 - 1.77 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU compare 5120 @ 0.78 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU compare 4096 @ 1.08 - 1.56 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU compare 2560 @ 0.89 - 1.69 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
RTX A1000 Laptop GPU compare 2048 128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
RTX A500 Laptop GPU compare 2048 64 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGA104
ArchitectureAmpere
Pipelines6144 - unified
TMUs192
ROPs96
Raytracing Cores48
Tensor / AI Cores192
Core Speed1215 - 1770 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance21.7 TFLOPS FP32
Memory Speed14000 effective = 1750 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory16 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth448 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption165 Watt (80 - 150 Watt TGP)
Transistor Count17.4 Billion
Die Size 392 mm²
technology8 nm
PCIe4.0
DisplaysHDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.1, PCIe 4.0 x16, 21.7 SP-FP TFLOPS Peak, 174 Tensor Performance Peak, up to 448 GB/s Memory Bandwidth, Resizable BAR, Support for Modern Standby
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement12.04.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 8348     avg: 9897     median: 10157 (29%)     max: 11185 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 8242     avg: 10043     median: 10307 (27%)     max: 11580 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 32082     avg: 33689     median: 33688.5 (36%)     max: 35295 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 46733     avg: 50154     median: 50153.5 (13%)     max: 53574 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 18791     avg: 21922     median: 22819 (40%)     max: 24155 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 23579     avg: 26820     median: 27271 (31%)     max: 29610 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 24697     avg: 28454     median: 28454 (39%)     max: 32211 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 30423     avg: 36164     median: 36163.5 (31%)     max: 41904 Points
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
specvp12 snx-02 +
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 276     avg: 297.6     median: 297.6 (33%)     max: 319.2 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 53.2     avg: 63.8     median: 63.8 (21%)     max: 74.3 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 260.5     avg: 285     median: 285.4 (51%)     max: 309.1 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 56.6     avg: 57.4     median: 56.9 (62%)     max: 58.7 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 55     avg: 64.8     median: 67.9 (62%)     max: 71.6 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 132.6     avg: 136.1     median: 136 (80%)     max: 139.7 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 93.6     avg: 99.5     median: 98.8 (76%)     max: 106 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 133.4     avg: 152.3     median: 151.3 (16%)     max: 172.2 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 21.42     avg: 22.8     median: 23.5 (22%)     max: 23.58 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 119.2     avg: 127.7     median: 129.5 (21%)     max: 134.5 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 39.3     avg: 87.1     median: 83.3 (18%)     max: 138.7 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 291     avg: 294.7     median: 291 (17%)     max: 302 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 125     avg: 157.7     median: 132 (19%)     max: 216 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 129     avg: 169     median: 152 (21%)     max: 226 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 132     avg: 176.3     median: 165 (36%)     max: 232 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4237     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (49%)     max: 0.681 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.435     avg: 0.6     median: 0.5 (45%)     max: 0.697 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
120  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
103  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
95  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
89  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
79  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
51  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
164 257 269 ~ 230 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
136 171 187 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
122 159 161 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
85 104 109 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
59 82.8 88.2 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38 48.7 53.6 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1920x1080
138
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
low 1280x720
206.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
147.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
138.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
125.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
87.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
47.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
114.6 118 ~ 116 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
83.1 104 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.1 90 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58.6 78 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
37.1 51 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16.7 25 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
91.7
low 1280x720
123  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
80  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
59  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
113  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
44  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
29  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
178.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
115.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
91.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
74.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
59.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
69  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
64  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
43  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing (DX12) 1920x1080
37
low 1280x720
133  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
109  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
101  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
91  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
73  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
40  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
253  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
181  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
164  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
133  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
63.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
145.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
181.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
120.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
94.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
66.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
34.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
159.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
121.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
85.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
46.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
25.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
146.1
low 1280x720
105  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
85  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
71  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
62  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
43  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
148 154 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
94.8 126 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69 74.5 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55 59.8 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
41 46.3 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24 28.5 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Quality DXR 16xAF 1920x1080
50.9
low 1280x720
128  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
109  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
106  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
94  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
71  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
112
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
337 412 419 ~ 389 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
195 231 251 ~ 226 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
165 192 213 ~ 190 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
147 160 191 ~ 166 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
108 129 146 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
64 86.8 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
76 137 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
69 93 121 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62 90 113 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
60 85 103 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
58 79 92 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
36 44 50 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
75
102
low 1280x720
108 117 136 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
90.8 102 114 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.5 81.6 90.5 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
48.6 52 65.3 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
155 184 184 ~ 174 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
110 123 144 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
81.1 91.8 108 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
62.6 70.6 83.6 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35.4 41 51.1 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
144 164 ~ 154 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
136 148 ~ 142 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
124 140 ~ 132 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
117 131 ~ 124 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
95 118 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
321 335.1 354 ~ 337 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
217.9 227.4 271 ~ 239 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
124 149.5 179 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81.7 89.9 98.3 ~ 90 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
54.8 57.5 74 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
175 180 181 ~ 179 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
169 175 175 ~ 173 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
131 158 161 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
76.1 85.8 94.6 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
70.4 82.2 84.3 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
75.5 76.3 92.5 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
44.4
42.1
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
164
160
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
171
168
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Far Cry 612010395897951
F1 2021230165147997747
Hitman 3206.6147.3138.1125.887.147.1
Cyberpunk 2077 1.01169479684421
Immortals Fenyx Rising1239084805938
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla1137664554429
Dirt 5178.1115.291.774.859.539
Watch Dogs Legion696460454326
Horizon Zero Dawn133109101917340
F1 202025318116413363.1
Gears Tactics145.8181.2120.394.766.634.9
Borderlands 3159.6121.685.967.146.825.6
Far Cry New Dawn1058578716243
Metro Exodus15111072574426
Shadow of the Tomb Raider128109106947138
Strange Brigade38922619016612875
Far Cry 51079488837643
X-Plane 11.111201028355
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark174126947243
Dota 2 Reborn154142132124107
The Witcher 33372391519062
GTA V179173150867981
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


5
17


12
10


14
8

3
13
4

7
10
1
5
12
5

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 17. 21:52:35

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.061s ... 0.062s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.062s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.062s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10675 +0.013s ... 0.075s

#7 got single benchmarks 10675 +0.018s ... 0.093s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.093s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.69s ... 0.782s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.783s

#11 Got 217 rows for game benchmarks. +0.088s ... 0.871s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.871s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.015s ... 0.886s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.132s ... 2.018s

#15 return log +0.065s ... 2.083s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU graphics card

MSI WE76 in review: Mobile workstation goes for maximum performance

MSI WE76 in review: Mobile workstation goes for maximum performance

MSI introduces the WE76, a powerful mobile workstation that is based on the GE76 gaming laptop. Besides a professional RTX GPU from Nvidia, the WE76 also impres...
Intel Core i9-11980HK | NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU | 17.30" | 2.9 kg
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 16 W7600 laptop in review: Powerful and light workstation

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 16 W7600 laptop in review: Powerful and light workstation

Asus launches the ProArt Studiobook W7600, the world's first notebook equipped with a 16-inch 4K OLED HDR display. In addition, it is not only compact and relat...
Intel Xeon W-11955M | NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 2.4 kg
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 workstation review: The Quadro RTX A5000 is a beast

HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 workstation review: The Quadro RTX A5000 is a beast

Last year's ZBook Fury 15 G7 was already one of the fastest mobile workstations available and now the ZBook Fury 15 G8 has topped it with even faster options. M...
Intel Core i9-11950H | NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU | 15.60" | 2.5 kg

MSI CreatorPro X17 HX A13VM: Intel Core i9-13980HX, 17.30", 3.3 kg
  External Review » MSI CreatorPro X17 HX A13VM

Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU000KGE: Intel Core i9-11950H, 17.30", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU000KGE

MSI WS66 11UMT-220US: Intel Core i9-11900H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI WS66 11UMT-220US

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4U9G1UT: Intel Xeon W-11955M, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4U9G1UT

HP ZBook Fury 15 G8: Intel Core i9-11950H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Fury 15 G8

Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ000VGE: Intel Core i9-11950H, 15.60", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P15 G2-20YQ000VGE

MSI WE76 11UM-456: Intel Core i9-11980HK, 17.30", 2.9 kg
   » MSI's WE76 mobile workstation combines a matte 4K AdobeRGB panel with the super powerful Nvidia RTX A5000

HP ZBook Fury 15 G8: Intel Core i9-11950H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
   » HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 vs. ZBook Fury 15 G8: What's the difference?

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2021-04-13)