Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 16 W7600 laptop in review: Powerful and light workstation

The laptop for designers? Asus launches the ProArt Studiobook W7600, the world's first notebook equipped with a 16-inch 4K OLED HDR display. In addition, it is not only compact and relatively light, but is also supposed to convince with big performance figures. The device also has an additional feature that is supposed to benefit creative workers and designers.

Patrick Schüdzig, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Anton Avdyushkin (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 12/02/2021 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

With the ProArt Studiobook Pro 16, Asus introduces a new notebook series for creative professionals. The creator notebook features a 4K OLED HDR display with 16:10 aspect ratio, which thus offers a larger work surface. In addition, there is a Asus Dial, which can be used to control a variety of creative tools and is thus supposed to simplify working for designers. The manufacturer brings out the big guns in terms of equipment, because not only the Intel's 3rd generation Xeon CPU is on board, but also the workstation GPU Nvidia RTX A5000. The series is thus aimed at professional users and is supposed to handle complex tasks like 3D rendering or high-resolution video editing. Since the test unit that was provided to us by Asus Germany is a pre-sample, the device does not get a rating from us yet.

Competitors include the HP ZBook Fury 15 G8, which is an identically equipped workstation, as well as the HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 and the Dell Precision 5560.

Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 (ProArt StudioBook 16 Series)

Processor

Intel Xeon W-11955M 8 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, 109 W PL2 / Short Burst, 90 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake H45

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1350 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, 90 W TDP ( including 20 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, Optimus, Resizable BAR, NVIDIA 466.60, Intel UHD Graphics

Memory

64 GB

, Dual-Channel

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 283 PPI, ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz

Mainboard

Intel WM590 (Tiger Lake PCH-H)

Storage

2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0), 4096 GB

, 3600 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Tiger Lake PCH-H - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SD

Networking

Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 21.4 x 362 x 264 ( = 0.84 x 14.25 x 10.39 in)

Battery

90 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4-cell

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes

Weight

2.4 kg ( = 84.66 oz / 5.29 pounds), Power Supply: 764 g ( = 26.95 oz / 1.68 pounds)

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
	12/2021	Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	21.4 mm	16.00"	3840x2400
90.3 %	10/2021	HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 i9-11950H, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	25.9 mm	15.60"	3840x2160
87.8 %	08/2021	HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	1.9 kg	18 mm	15.60"	3840x2160
88.3 %	10/2021	Dell Precision 5000 5560 i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	2 kg	18 mm	15.60"	3840x2400

Case

The case of the Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 is very sturdy and with 2.4 kg it's relatively light for its size. The case is made of coated magnesium alloy, which gives it a matte, glittery and also rougher surface. A special feature of the device is the Asus Dial Controller, which is embedded next to the trackpad and can, for example, make controlling some functions in image and video editing programs particularly precise. In addition, the Asus Dial Controller can be used for faster adjustment of the brightness or volume of the system. The design of the Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 is decent and looks very neat with the arrangement of the keyboard, trackpad and Asus Dial. What also stands out about the case are the high feet, which are supposed to provide the user with more comfort while typing. These higher feet cause the keyboard to be higher than the palm rest. Asus has also made a recess in the back center of the stand that allows more fresh air to pass through in order to optimize the cooling of the device.

With its 16-inch display and an overall height of only 2.1 centimeters, the Asus ProArt StudioBook is surprisingly slim. While the HP ZBook Fury with its smaller display is slightly narrower on the outside, it is almost half a centimeter taller than our device. Weight-wise, the competition is noticeably lighter than our Asus, with the ZBook Fury being the only exception.

Size comparison

Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Dell Precision 5000 5560 DIN A4 ❌

Equipment

The notebook's ports are distributed on two sides: on the left side, there are Kensington Lock, USB-A 3.2 Gen.2, the power connector, HDMI 2.1, Thunderbolt 4, and a USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 port in addition to the cooling system's air vents. Air vents extend over the right side just like on the left. There is also a full-sized SD card reader, a 3.5 mm combo jack, USB-A 3.2 Gen.2 and Gigabit LAN on the right side. Both Thunderbolt 4 and the USB-C port support Power Delivery and allow connecting one display each. The ports are spaced far enough apart and do not affect user's comfort when all ports are occupied. Only the cooling system's air vents are located on the notebook's back side.

Left side: 1 Kensington Lock, USB-A 3.2 Gen.2, power port, HDMI 2.1, 1 Thunderbolt 4, USB-C 3.2 Gen.2

SD Card Reader

The transfer rate of the integrated SD card reader is lower than expected in our pre-production device. Even the average data throughput is not achieved with our 128 GB Angelbird AV PRO V60 reference memory card.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Precision 5000 5560 (AV Pro V60)	196.9 MB/s ∼100% +188%
Average of class Workstation (60.6 - 207, n=26, last 2 years)	118.3 MB/s ∼60% +73%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 (AV Pro V60)	75.6 MB/s ∼38% +11%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 (AV Pro V60)	73.8 MB/s ∼37% +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	68.3 MB/s ∼35%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Precision 5000 5560 (AV Pro V60)	198.4 MB/s ∼100% +129%
Average of class Workstation (78.6 - 262, n=26, last 2 years)	141.8 MB/s ∼71% +64%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 (AV Pro V60)	88.6 MB/s ∼45% +2%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 (AV Pro V60)	87.2 MB/s ∼44% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	86.7 MB/s ∼44%

Communication

The Intel Wi-Fi AX201 installed in our pre-production device cannot exploit its performance potential in our performance test and ends up 20 to 60 percent behind the average.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1419 (1169^min - 1609^max) MBit/s ∼100% +61%
Average of class Workstation (767 - 1506, n=23, last 2 years)	1286 MBit/s ∼91% +45%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1211 (954^min - 1321^max) MBit/s ∼85% +37%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324)	1161 MBit/s ∼82% +31%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	981 (864^min - 1044^max) MBit/s ∼69% +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	884 (468^min - 938^max) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1382 (1340^min - 1446^max) MBit/s ∼100% +139%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1363 (1311^min - 1453^max) MBit/s ∼99% +135%
Average of class Workstation (579 - 1553, n=23, last 2 years)	1319 MBit/s ∼95% +128%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324)	1261 MBit/s ∼91% +118%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1249 (1170^min - 1318^max) MBit/s ∼90% +116%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	579 (368^min - 652^max) MBit/s ∼42%

Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø579 (368-652)

Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø868 (468-938)

Webcam

The camera quality of the 720p webcam in our test device is very poor. Like most laptop cameras, it lacks image sharpness and color accuracy.

ColorChecker Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2: 18.37 ∆E min: 3.32 - max: 28.72 ∆E

Maintenance

The base plate can be easily removed by loosening ten cross screws. Inside, users will have direct access to both RAM and SSD slots, which are fully occupied in our review unit. Accordingly, the fans can also be cleaned this way. It is worth mentioning that the cooling circuit also covers the chipset and even the RAM and SSDs have passive cooling. For the latter, there are additional heat conduction pads on the base plate.

Input devices: Professional work with Asus Dial

Keyboard

The keyboard of the Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 is characterized by a good pressure point. The keys have a normal size and feel very comfortable when typing despite the rougher surface. The keystroke clatter is rather discreet and is not perceived as annoying. The keyboard illumination can be adjusted in three levels. In addition, there is the Asus Dial Controller: thanks to the ergonomic edges of the round controller, settings can be made very precisely and also very quietly. For example, you can intuitively control the brush in Photoshop or easily change the layer via the dial. Zooming, navigating or adjusting the color balance or hue should be easy with the Dial Controller. Our image gallery shows a few examples of using the Dial Controller.

Touchpad

The touchpad of our pre-production sample offers the user a large surface as well as very good gliding properties. Similarly, multi-touch features such as scrolling or switching tabs work smoothly here. The special 3-button touchpad is suitable for 3D designers who need centered control for application functions such as panning, rotating or circling. Combined with the Asus Dial, these two features are a real dream team for creative professionals.

Display: World's first 4K OLED HDR panel in 16:10 format

Our review sample features a 4K OLED HDR panel with a 16-inch screen diagonal and 16:10 aspect ratio. It makes a good impression at first glance and offers the typical advantages of OLED panels. Furthermore, it have very good factory calibration due to the Pantone certification and is thus perfectly suited for editing pictures and videos. The backlight is very even at 96%, only the maximum brightness could be better. Apart from that, PWM at a frequency of 240 Hz is present at brightness levels of 80 percent and lower. Competition can score some points too: for example, HP ZBook Fury is equipped with a non-reflective, 120 Hz and much brighter panel. However, it also has some drawbacks, such as graininess, halos and a poorer calibration.

Since our pre-production sample has an OLED panel, there is no screen bleeding.


369 cd/m²	361 cd/m²	363 cd/m²
360 cd/m²	353 cd/m²	362 cd/m²
357 cd/m²	357 cd/m²	362 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

ATNA60YV02-0

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 369 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 360.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 354 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.45 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 2.77
ΔE Greyscale 1.88 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
98.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.31

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00	HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 BOE0969, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60	HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 SDC4145, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60	Dell Precision 5000 5560 Sharp LQ156R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.60
Display		-5%	-1%	-1%
Display P3 Coverage	99.9	95.9 -4%	99.9 0%	94.9 -5%
sRGB Coverage	100	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	98.6	87.3 -11%	95.3 -3%	100 1%
Response Times		-545%	-13%	-1840%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	2 ?(1, 1)	14.8 ?(7.6, 7.2) -640%	2.4 ?(1, 1.4) -20%	47.2 ?(25.2, 22) -2260%
Response Time Black / White *	2 ?(1, 1)	11 ?(7.6, 3.4) -450%	2.4 ?(1.1, 1.3) -20%	30.4 ?(16.4, 14) -1420%
PWM Frequency	240 ?(80)		240.4 ?(52) 0%
Screen		-40%	-36%	-24%
Brightness middle	353	626 77%	379.6 8%	501.5 42%
Brightness	360	589 64%	380 6%	467 30%
Brightness Distribution	96	87 -9%	95 -1%	83 -14%
Black Level *		0.58		0.44
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.45	5.41 -121%	5.15 -110%	4.73 -93%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.75	9.05 -141%	7.79 -108%	8.45 -125%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.77	0.6 78%	3.1 -12%	0.51 82%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.88	6.2 -230%	2.6 -38%	3.6 -91%
Gamma	2.31 ^95%	2.66 ^83%	1.99 ^111%	2.08 ^106%
CCT	6441 ^101%	6101 ^107%	6166 ^105%	6447 ^101%
Contrast		1079		1140
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-197% / -116%	-17% / -23%	-622% / -321%

* ... smaller is better

Thanks to the 4K OLED HDR display, our pre-production sample offers an extremely high contrast and rich, deep blacks. The panel covers the DCI-P3 and sRGB color spaces completely and also delivers very good values in the AdobeRGB 1998 color space with 98.6%. In addition, there is a very high image sharpness which delivers a very good picture, which means that the display meets the requirements for professional graphics editing.

Our pre-production test sample is only suitable for outdoor use to a limited extent. With a brightness of 350 cd/m² and the glossy display, you already have a poor view even in the shade. Among the competition HP ZBook Fury can do better thanks to the installed IPS panel with a brightness of over 600 cd/m².

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.7 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240 Hz

≤ 80 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19466 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Thanks to the built-in OLED HDR panel, the viewing angles of our Asus ProArt Studiobook Pro 16 OLED are super-wide with no image degradation whatsoever.

Performance: Upper-class performance with sophisticated cooling

Asus does not make any compromises and relies on the latest and most powerful components that Intel and Nvidia currently offer for workstations. Therefore, a Intel Xeon W-11955M is at work inside in combination with 64 GB DDR4 RAM and two 2 TB NVMe SSDs in a Raid 0 array. The graphics load is distributed between Nvidia RTX A5000 and the Intel UHD Graphics based on the XE architecture. The installed working memory in our device is ECC RAM clocked at 3200 MHz. Unfortunately, the SSD slots are occupied by two PCI-Express 3.0 SSDs. In view of the rest of the configuration, PCIe Gen.4 could have been more apropriate. It is questionable whether other configurations will be available, but that remains to be seen.

Processor

Let's now talk about the Tiger-Lake octa-core CPU, which was introduced in the 2nd quarter of 2021. The Intel Xeon W11955M, which is designed for mobile workstations, is manufactured on the new 10 nm SuperFin process and, in comparison to the Intel Core i9-11950H additionally offers support for ECC memory. The chip has a TDP of 45 watts, which was however configured higher in our test sample and increases to a permanent 54 watts depending on the application scenario. The processor cores can clock from 2.6 to 5 GHz and support DDR4-3200 memory.

In our Cinebench Multi endurance test, the performance is on the expected level and thus easily outperforms the HP ZBook Fury's Intel Core i9-11950H. On the one hand, this is also due to the installed cooling system, which is also designed for a combined TDP of 140W. We tested the device in the performance mode, which is available in Asus ProArt Creator Hub and dynamically adapts the cooling to the required tasks. For everyday tasks there is the standard mode, and app also allows to set the fans to full speed. However, this did not represent much added value in tests, apart from the necessity to wear the headset when the fans run at a permanently high 5,600 RPM. In battery mode, the system slows our device down from 54 to 15 watts, which is also noticeable in the performance. More details about the processor can be found in our CPU section

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M: Ø1771 (1747.11-1845.61)

HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H: Ø1775 (1695.06-1826.82)

HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H: Ø1806 (1765.46-1841.11)

Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H: Ø1525 (1468.05-1546.97)

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H: Ø1803 (1759.48-1988.07)

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	14066 Points ∼100% +29%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	13012 Points ∼93% +20%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	12247 (11482^min - 12246.8^max) Points ∼87% +13%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	12166 (11410^min - 12166.4^max) Points ∼86% +12%
Average of class Workstation (4332 - 20351, n=33, last 2 years)	11657 Points ∼83% +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	10862 (10718^min - 10862.2^max) Points ∼77%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	10862 Points ∼77% 0%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	9779 (9273.99^min - 9779.26^max) Points ∼70% -10%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	1619 Points ∼100% +9%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	1596 Points ∼99% +8%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	1575 Points ∼97% +6%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	1569 Points ∼97% +6%
Average of class Workstation (1144 - 1885, n=32, last 2 years)	1536 Points ∼95% +4%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	1513 Points ∼93% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	1480 Points ∼91%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	1480 Points ∼91% 0%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	5055 Points ∼100% +19%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	4878 Points ∼96% +15%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	4669 Points ∼92% +10%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	4660 Points ∼92% +10%
Average of class Workstation (1669 - 7971, n=35, last 2 years)	4317 Points ∼85% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	4250 Points ∼84%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	4250 Points ∼84% 0%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	3826 Points ∼76% -10%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	634 Points ∼100% +12%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	618 Points ∼97% +9%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	610 Points ∼96% +7%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	610 Points ∼96% +7%
Average of class Workstation (469 - 727, n=35, last 2 years)	600 Points ∼95% +6%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	583 Points ∼92% +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	568 Points ∼90%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	568 Points ∼90% 0%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	2361 Points ∼100% +28%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	2148 (1832.59^min - 2147.65^max) Points ∼91% +16%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	1846 (1747.11^min - 1845.61^max) Points ∼78%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	1846 Points ∼78% 0%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	1841 (1765.46^min - 1841.11^max) Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Workstation (706 - 3520, n=36, last 2 years)	1830 Points ∼78% -1%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	1827 (1695.06^min - 1826.82^max) Points ∼77% -1%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	1547 (1468.05^min - 1546.97^max) Points ∼66% -16%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	254 Points ∼100% +10%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	241 Points ∼95% +5%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	238 Points ∼94% +3%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	236 Points ∼93% +3%
Average of class Workstation (180 - 274, n=35, last 2 years)	233 Points ∼92% +1%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	232 Points ∼91% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	230 Points ∼91%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	230 Points ∼91% 0%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Workstation (160 - 684, n=34, last 2 years)	329 Seconds * ∼100% -19%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	313 Seconds * ∼95% -13%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	276 Seconds * ∼84%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	276 Seconds * ∼84% -0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	261 Seconds * ∼79% +5%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	254 Seconds * ∼77% +8%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	249 Seconds * ∼76% +10%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	227 Seconds * ∼69% +18%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	57579 MIPS ∼100% +22%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	53205 MIPS ∼92% +13%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	50060 MIPS ∼87% +6%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	50050 MIPS ∼87% +6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	47264 MIPS ∼82%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	47264 MIPS ∼82% 0%
Average of class Workstation (20087 - 80204, n=35, last 2 years)	46314 MIPS ∼80% -2%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	44890 MIPS ∼78% -5%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	6174 MIPS ∼100% +18%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	5773 MIPS ∼94% +11%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	5755 MIPS ∼93% +10%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	5727 MIPS ∼93% +10%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	5640 MIPS ∼91% +8%
Average of class Workstation (4417 - 6197, n=35, last 2 years)	5555 MIPS ∼90% +6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	5222 MIPS ∼85%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	5222 MIPS ∼85% 0%

Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	10482 Points ∼100% +26%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	9856 Points ∼94% +18%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M (8349 - 9766, n=2)	9058 Points ∼86% +8%
Average of class Workstation (4955 - 15483, n=33, last 2 years)	8758 Points ∼84% +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	8349 Points ∼80%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	7286 Points ∼70% -13%

Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	1777 Points ∼100% +20%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	1702 Points ∼96% +14%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	1632 Points ∼92% +10%
Average of class Workstation (1124 - 1924, n=33, last 2 years)	1616 Points ∼91% +9%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M (1487 - 1686, n=2)	1587 Points ∼89% +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	1487 Points ∼84%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	17.1 fps ∼100% +28%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	15 fps ∼88% +12%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	14.5 fps ∼85% +8%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	14.2 fps ∼83% +6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	13.4 fps ∼78%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	13.4 fps ∼78% 0%
Average of class Workstation (5.09 - 23.5, n=35, last 2 years)	13.1 fps ∼77% -2%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	12.6 fps ∼74% -6%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	52.2 s * ∼100% -127%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	49.3 s * ∼94% -114%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	48.6 s * ∼93% -111%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	48 s * ∼92% -109%
Average of class Workstation (23 - 62.3, n=35, last 2 years)	47.3 s * ∼91% -106%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	40.5 s * ∼78% -76%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	23 s * ∼44%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	23 s * ∼44% -0%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	0.57 sec * ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	0.57 sec * ∼100% -0%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	0.551 sec * ∼97% +3%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	0.544 sec * ∼95% +5%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	0.543 sec * ∼95% +5%
Average of class Workstation (0.4416 - 0.621, n=35, last 2 years)	0.535 sec * ∼94% +6%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H	0.533 sec * ∼94% +6%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K	0.4981 sec * ∼87% +13%

SPECviewperf 2020 v1 / Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	199.4 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	199.4 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	176 fps ∼88% -12%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	114.3 fps ∼57% -43%
Average of class Workstation (23.2 - 258, n=33, last 2 years)	114.1 fps ∼57% -43%

SPECviewperf 2020 v1 / Siemens NX (snx-04)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	309.1 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	309 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	285.4 fps ∼92% -8%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	175.1 fps ∼57% -43%
Average of class Workstation (17 - 411, n=33, last 2 years)	173.2 fps ∼56% -44%

SPECviewperf 2020 v1 / Medical (medical-03)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	58.7 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	58.7 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	56.9 fps ∼97% -3%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	33.98 fps ∼58% -42%
Average of class Workstation (7.5 - 68.3, n=33, last 2 years)	31.4 fps ∼53% -47%

SPECviewperf 2020 v1 / Maya (maya-06)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	290 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	290 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	258.3 fps ∼89% -11%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	196.6 fps ∼68% -32%
Average of class Workstation (46.8 - 404, n=33, last 2 years)	182.4 fps ∼63% -37%

SPECviewperf 2020 v1 / Energy (energy-03)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	67.9 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	67.9 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	55 fps ∼81% -19%
Average of class Workstation (0.89 - 71.6, n=33, last 2 years)	29.8 fps ∼44% -56%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	29.44 fps ∼43% -57%

SPECviewperf 2020 v1 / Creo (creo-03)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	139.7 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	139.7 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	136 fps ∼97% -3%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	91.5 fps ∼65% -35%
Average of class Workstation (26.7 - 165.1, n=33, last 2 years)	85.7 fps ∼61% -39%

SPECviewperf 2020 v1 / CATIA (catia-06)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	98.8 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	98.8 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	93.6 fps ∼95% -5%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	53.5 fps ∼54% -46%
Average of class Workstation (10.6 - 109.8, n=33, last 2 years)	53.5 fps ∼54% -46%

SPECviewperf 2020 v1 / 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	123.1 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	123.1 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	120 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Workstation (15.7 - 144.6, n=33, last 2 years)	64.7 fps ∼53% -47%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	59.6 fps ∼48% -52%

SPECviewperf 2020 v1 / Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	92.5 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	92.5 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Workstation (31.2 - 109, n=11, last 2 years)	73.4 fps ∼79% -21%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	72.8 fps ∼79% -21%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	31.2 fps ∼34% -66%

SPECviewperf 2020 v1 / Siemens NX (snx-04)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	172.2 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	172.2 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	151.3 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Workstation (14.4 - 301, n=11, last 2 years)	148.1 fps ∼86% -14%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	99.9 fps ∼58% -42%

SPECviewperf 2020 v1 / Medical (medical-03)
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	23.6 fps ∼100% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	23.58 fps ∼100%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	21.42 fps ∼91% -9%
Average of class Workstation (9.93 - 25.8, n=11, last 2 years)	17.4 fps ∼74% -26%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	10.84 fps ∼46% -54%

SPECviewperf 2020 v1 / Maya (maya-06)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	134.5 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	134.5 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Workstation (75.8 - 218, n=11, last 2 years)	122.9 fps ∼91% -9%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	119.2 fps ∼89% -11%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	79.3 fps ∼59% -41%

SPECviewperf 2020 v1 / Energy (energy-03)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	138.7 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	138.7 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Workstation (9.4 - 138.7, n=11, last 2 years)	53.3 fps ∼38% -62%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	39.3 fps ∼28% -72%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	9.4 fps ∼7% -93%

SPECviewperf 2020 v1 / Creo (creo-03)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	89.8 fps ∼100% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	88.6 fps ∼99%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	88.6 fps ∼99% 0%
Average of class Workstation (49.8 - 117.5, n=11, last 2 years)	74 fps ∼82% -16%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	49.77 fps ∼55% -44%

SPECviewperf 2020 v1 / CATIA (catia-06)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	57.9 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	57.9 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	53 fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Workstation (22.3 - 68.6, n=11, last 2 years)	46.7 fps ∼81% -19%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	22.34 fps ∼39% -61%

SPECviewperf 2020 v1 / 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	87.8 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M	87.8 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	77 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Workstation (30.5 - 87.8, n=11, last 2 years)	62 fps ∼71% -29%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H	30.46 fps ∼35% -65%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1846 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

291 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

230 Points

Help

... in comparison

System performance

The system performance is also - according to expectations - above that of all rivals. Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 has to admit defeat only to the desktop counterpart Schenker XMG Ultra 17 with the Intel Core i9 11900K and the Lenovo Thinkpad P1. We couldn't determine any problems with the system in everyday use and all tasks were implemented without delays. Only the slight difference between mains and battery operation is noticeable when opening and closing programs.

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 / Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	7884 Points ∼100% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7156 Points ∼91% +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	6951 Points ∼88%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	6951 Points ∼88% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	6789 Points ∼86% -2%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	6751 Points ∼86% -3%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6676 Points ∼85% -4%
Average of class Workstation (4960 - 7246, n=35, last 2 years)	6177 Points ∼78% -11%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	11050 Points ∼100% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10894 Points ∼99% +7%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10596 Points ∼96% +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	10145 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	10145 Points ∼92% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	10037 Points ∼91% -1%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	9915 Points ∼90% -2%
Average of class Workstation (8059 - 11465, n=35, last 2 years)	9831 Points ∼89% -3%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	9827 Points ∼100% +10%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9005 Points ∼92% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	8971 Points ∼91%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	8971 Points ∼91% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8913 Points ∼91% -1%
Average of class Workstation (7080 - 10374, n=35, last 2 years)	8551 Points ∼87% -5%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	8491 Points ∼86% -5%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	8461 Points ∼86% -6%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	12250 Points ∼100% +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10241 Points ∼84% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	10015 Points ∼82%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	10015 Points ∼82% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	9967 Points ∼81% 0%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	9952 Points ∼81% -1%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8463 Points ∼69% -15%
Average of class Workstation (4477 - 10241, n=35, last 2 years)	7751 Points ∼63% -23%

PCMark 10 Score		6951 points
Help

DPC latencies

Since the intended use of our test device includes working with audio and video files, the DPC latencies could cause problems. The test showed a need for optimization in terms of latencies, and our device itself had dropped frames during our Youtube video test.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	1508 μs * ∼100% -1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	1493 μs * ∼99%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	759 μs * ∼50% +49%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	578 μs * ∼38% +61%

* ... smaller is better

Storage

The pre-production device theoretically supports up to two M.2 PCI-Express 4.0 NVMe SSDs, so it is questionable why Asus installs two SSDs with PCIe 3.0 in a RAID 0 configuration here. These perform rather mediocre in the AS SSD benchmark and Crystal DiskMark, and even the single PCIe 3.0 SSD in HP Zbook Fury is behind our configuration in some benchmark sections. Here, too, we see a need for optimization: Asus should either rely on PCIe 4.0 drives, or get busy optimizing their drivers.

	Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	Dell Precision 5000 5560 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Average 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		38%	174%	44%	110%		0%
Write 4K	105.6	96.3 -9%	240 127%	110.5 5%	172.4 63%		105.6 0%
Read 4K	50.2	51.5 3%	87.8 75%	51.8 3%	78.8 57%		50.2 0%
Write Seq	445.6	1942 336%	4281 861%	2071 365%	2991 571%		446 0%
Read Seq	753	2504 233%	4228 461%	2505 233%	3351 345%		753 0%
Write 4K Q32T1	2713	346.6 -87%	696 -74%	429.8 -84%	459.2 -83%		2713 0%
Read 4K Q32T1	2399	408 -83%	778 -68%	418.3 -83%	484.3 -80%		2399 0%
Write Seq Q32T1	5378	3019 -44%	5195 -3%	3060 -43%	4761 -11%		5378 0%
Read Seq Q32T1	6189	3514 -43%	7099 15%	3539 -43%	7071 14%		6189 0%
AS SSD		-21%	80%	14%	35%	85%	0%
Seq Read	4317	2937 -32%	5010 16%	2953 -32%	5169 20%	4526 5%	4317 0%
Seq Write	2037	1688 -17%	3974 95%	1691 -17%	1986 -3%	3988 96%	2037 0%
4K Read	48.97	44.27 -10%	51.9 6%	43.98 -10%	78 59%	82.9 69%	49 0%
4K Write	112.4	105.8 -6%	156.8 40%	105.4 -6%	214.6 91%	207.5 85%	112.4 0%
4K-64 Read	1253	873 -30%	2611 108%	1065 -15%	1232 -2%	2751 120%	1253 0%
4K-64 Write	1473	1996 36%	3859 162%	1957 33%	2719 85%	3270 122%	1473 0%
Access Time Read *	0.045	0.048 -7%	0.072 -60%	0.04 11%	0.024 47%	0.024 47%	0.045 -0%
Access Time Write *	0.083	0.107 -29%	0.026 69%	0.105 -27%	0.059 29%	0.021 75%	0.083 -0%
Score Read	1765	1211 -31%	3164 79%	1404 -20%	1827 4%	3287 86%	1765 0%
Score Write	1722	2271 32%	4414 156%	2232 30%	3133 82%	3876 125%	1722 0%
Score Total	4256	4046 -5%	9134 115%	4297 1%	5753 35%	8821 107%	4256 0%
Copy ISO MB/s	2441	901 -63%	3424 40%	2474 1%	3201 31%		2441 0%
Copy Program MB/s	395.7	118.7 -70%	1091 176%	1074 171%	415.8 5%		396 0%
Copy Game MB/s	1115	372 -67%	2365 112%	1929 73%	1212 9%		1115 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		9% / 0%	127% / 114%	29% / 25%	73% / 62%	85% / 85%	0% / 0%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6189 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5378 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 2399 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 2713 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 753 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 445.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 50.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 105.6 MB/s

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2: Ø5970 (2469.7-6250.43)

Graphics card

Thanks to the installed cooling system and a TDP of up to 110 watts, the RTX A5000 with its 16 GB VRAM is convincing in terms of pure graphics performance and thus ranks 15 to 20 percent ahead of the HP ZBook Fury in the synthetic benchmarks.

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900K	30650 Points ∼100% +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H	28939 Points ∼94% +6%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	28687 Points ∼94% +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M	27271 Points ∼89%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU (23579 - 29610, n=3)	26820 Points ∼88% -2%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	23579 Points ∼77% -14%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	21399 Points ∼70% -22%
Average of class Workstation (3572 - 29610, n=35, last 2 years)	13597 Points ∼44% -50%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900K	13144 Points ∼100% +28%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	12055 Points ∼92% +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H	11424 Points ∼87% +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M	10307 Points ∼78%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU (8242 - 11580, n=3)	10043 Points ∼76% -3%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	8242 Points ∼63% -20%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	7909 Points ∼60% -23%
Average of class Workstation (1091 - 11580, n=35, last 2 years)	5133 Points ∼39% -50%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900K	15128 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M	13435 Points ∼89%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	13435 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Workstation (last 2 years)	13435 Points ∼89% 0%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900K	7967 Points ∼100% +17%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	7754 Points ∼97% +13%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M	6833 Points ∼86%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU (5816 - 6833, n=2)	6325 Points ∼79% -7%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	5816 Points ∼73% -15%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	5438 Points ∼68% -20%
Average of class Workstation (2388 - 7026, n=8, last 2 years)	5018 Points ∼63% -27%

3DMark Fire Strike Score		22819 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		12825 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		10157 points
Help

Gaming performance

Although our pre-production device is not optimized for gaming, it still handles most titles in QHD. However, the display is limited to 60 Hz. Among the competitors only real gaming powerhouses - like the Schenker XMG Ultra - can clearly outperform our review sample. Overall, the gaming performance of the Asus ProArt Studiobook Pro 16 is on the lower level of an RTX 3080.

As expected, the gaming performance is very limited on battery power.

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	242 (65.9^min, 93.8^P0.1, 168^P1 - 419^max) fps ∼100% +95%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	174 (141^min) fps ∼72% +40%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	154.2 (135^min - 171^max) fps ∼64% +24%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU (124 - 179, n=3)	150.8 fps ∼62% +22%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	149.5 (141^min - 165^max) fps ∼62% +21%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	124 fps ∼51%
Average of class Workstation (20.2 - 212, n=33, last 2 years)	97 fps ∼40% -22%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	92.4 (86^min - 97^max) fps ∼38% -25%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	123 (64.1^min, 75.8^P0.1, 90.7^P1 - 241^max) fps ∼100% +37%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	93.8 (75^min) fps ∼76% +4%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU (81.7 - 98.3, n=3)	90 fps ∼73% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	89.9 (87^min, 88^P1 - 93^max) fps ∼73%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	81.7 (78^min - 87^max) fps ∼66% -9%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	81.5 (72^min - 87^max) fps ∼66% -9%
Average of class Workstation (11.4 - 110.4, n=34, last 2 years)	51.4 fps ∼42% -43%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	50 (48^min - 53^max) fps ∼41% -44%

GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	164 (5.22^min, 100^P1 - 283^max) fps ∼100% +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	158 (3.82^min, 90.9^P1 - 384^max) fps ∼96%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU (131 - 161, n=3)	150 fps ∼91% -5%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	131 (11.7^min, 35.7^P1 - 238^max) fps ∼80% -17%
Average of class Workstation (29.1 - 177.7, n=25, last 2 years)	115.8 fps ∼71% -27%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	112 (15.5^min, 55.6^P1 - 225^max) fps ∼68% -29%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	98.5 (17.3^min, 62.5^P1 - 209^max) fps ∼100% +15%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	85.8 (21.2^min, 52.6^P1 - 178^max) fps ∼87%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU (76.1 - 94.6, n=3)	85.5 fps ∼87% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	76.1 (5.43^min, 28.6^P1 - 148^max) fps ∼77% -11%
Average of class Workstation (13.3 - 124.4, n=25, last 2 years)	63.8 fps ∼65% -26%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	57.8 (7.07^min, 23.3^P1 - 124^max) fps ∼59% -33%
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	82.3 (16.3^min, 58.8^P1 - 145^max) fps ∼100% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	82.2 (16^min, 55.6^P1 - 163^max) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU (70.4 - 84.3, n=3)	79 fps ∼96% -4%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	70.4 (4.81^min, 27.8^P1 - 144^max) fps ∼86% -14%
Average of class Workstation (9.13 - 103.5, n=15, last 2 years)	59.8 fps ∼73% -27%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	42.9 (5.15^min, 17.9^P1 - 97.1^max) fps ∼52% -48%
3840x2160 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	44.4 (10.1^min, 30.3^P1 - 95.9^max) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU (42.1 - 44.4, n=2)	43.3 fps ∼98% -2%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	42.1 (7.59^min, 25.6^P1 - 95.2^max) fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Workstation (4.44 - 44.4, n=5, last 2 years)	27.4 fps ∼62% -38%
3840x2160 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:FX AF:8x
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	86.5 (25.9^min, 62.5^P1 - 195^max) fps ∼100% +13%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU (75.5 - 92.5, n=3)	81.4 fps ∼94% +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	76.3 (29.3^min, 47.6^P1 - 184^max) fps ∼88%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	75.5 (13.9^min, 28.6^P1 - 195^max) fps ∼87% -1%
Average of class Workstation (8.82 - 92.5, n=9, last 2 years)	53.3 fps ∼62% -30%

Dota 2 Reborn
3840x2160 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	118 (97.8^min) fps ∼100%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	110 (8.5^min) fps ∼93% -7%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU (95 - 118, n=2)	106.5 fps ∼90% -10%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	95 (57.1^min) fps ∼81% -19%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	93.1 (67.6^min) fps ∼79% -21%
Average of class Workstation (21 - 132.8, n=18, last 2 years)	84.4 fps ∼72% -28%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	62.9 (57.3^min) fps ∼53% -47%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	156 (137.1^min) fps ∼100% +33%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	131 (113.6^min) fps ∼84% +12%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	131 (112.8^min) fps ∼84% +12%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU (117 - 131, n=2)	124 fps ∼79% +6%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	119 (102^min) fps ∼76% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	117 (97^min) fps ∼75%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	116.3 (90.8^min) fps ∼75% -1%
Average of class Workstation (52.4 - 156.3, n=34, last 2 years)	111.8 fps ∼72% -4%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	161 (140.5^min) fps ∼100% +30%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	146 (120.5^min) fps ∼91% +18%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	140 (121.3^min) fps ∼87% +13%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	135.8 (95.1^min) fps ∼84% +10%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU (124 - 140, n=2)	132 fps ∼82% +6%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	130 (112.5^min) fps ∼81% +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	124 (103.4^min) fps ∼77%
Average of class Workstation (55.6 - 166.1, n=34, last 2 years)	120.5 fps ∼75% -3%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
3840x2160 High Quality
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	42.9 (27^min) fps ∼100% +5%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU (35.4 - 51.1, n=3)	42.5 fps ∼99% +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	41 fps ∼96%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	36.2 fps ∼84% -12%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	35.4 fps ∼83% -14%
Average of class Workstation (4.64 - 51.1, n=14, last 2 years)	29.3 fps ∼68% -29%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	19.3 fps ∼45% -53%
2560x1440 High Quality
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU (62.6 - 83.6, n=3)	72.3 fps ∼100% +2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	71.2 (44^min) fps ∼98% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	70.6 fps ∼98%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	62.6 fps ∼87% -11%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	61.3 fps ∼85% -13%
Average of class Workstation (8.33 - 83.6, n=19, last 2 years)	46.8 fps ∼65% -34%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	34.4 fps ∼48% -51%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU (81.1 - 108, n=3)	93.6 fps ∼100% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	91.8 fps ∼98%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	88 (56^min) fps ∼94% -4%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	81.1 fps ∼87% -12%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	78.5 fps ∼84% -14%
Average of class Workstation (12.3 - 113.1, n=29, last 2 years)	52.9 fps ∼57% -42%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	46.6 fps ∼50% -49%

X-Plane 11.11
3840x2160 high (fps_test=3)
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	63.2 fps ∼100% +22%
Average of class Workstation (17.6 - 93.8, n=19, last 2 years)	59.3 fps ∼94% +14%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU (48.6 - 65.3, n=3)	55.3 fps ∼88% +6%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	54.4 fps ∼86% +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	52 fps ∼82%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	48.6 fps ∼77% -7%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	45.3 fps ∼72% -13%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	113 fps ∼100% +38%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	89.2 fps ∼79% +9%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	83.5 fps ∼74% +2%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU (76.5 - 90.5, n=3)	82.9 fps ∼73% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	81.6 fps ∼72%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	76.5 fps ∼68% -6%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	75.1 fps ∼66% -8%
Average of class Workstation (28.4 - 108.8, n=35, last 2 years)	75 fps ∼66% -8%

Far Cry 5
3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	52 (47^min) fps ∼100% +44%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	44 (39^min - 55^max) fps ∼85% +22%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	44 (39^min - 55^max) fps ∼85% +22%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU (36 - 50, n=3)	43.3 fps ∼83% +20%
Average of class Workstation (26 - 50, n=7, last 2 years)	37.4 fps ∼72% +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	36 fps ∼69%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	90 (80^min) fps ∼100% +55%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	81 (71^min - 99^max) fps ∼90% +40%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	79 (57^min - 93^max) fps ∼88% +36%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU (58 - 92, n=3)	76.3 fps ∼85% +32%
Average of class Workstation (41 - 92, n=9, last 2 years)	66.1 fps ∼73% +14%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	58 fps ∼64%
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	49 (41^min - 61^max) fps ∼54% -16%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	146 (112^min - 188^max) fps