Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 16 W7600 laptop in review: Powerful and light workstation

The book for designers? Asus launches the ProArt Studiobook W7600, the world's first notebook equipped with a 16-inch 4K OLED HDR display. In addition, it is not only compact and relatively light, but is also supposed to convince with big performance figures. The device also has an additional feature that is supposed to benefit creative workers and designers.
Patrick Schüdzig, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Anton Avdyushkin (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

With the ProArt Studiobook Pro 16, Asus introduces a new notebook series for creative professionals. The creator notebook features a 4K OLED HDR display with 16:10 aspect ratio, which thus offers a larger work surface. In addition, there is a Asus Dial, which can be used to control a variety of creative tools and is thus supposed to simplify working for designers. The manufacturer brings out the big guns in terms of equipment, because not only the Intel's 3rd generation Xeon CPU is on board, but also the workstation GPU Nvidia RTX A5000. The series is thus aimed at professional users and is supposed to handle complex tasks like 3D rendering or high-resolution video editing. Since the test unit that was provided to us by Asus Germany is a pre-sample, the device does not get a rating from us yet.

Competitors include the HP ZBook Fury 15 G8, which is an identically equipped workstation, as well as the HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 and the Dell Precision 5560.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! English native speakers welcome!

News Writer (AUS/NZL based) - Details here

German-English-Translator - Details here (English native speakers preferred)

 

 

 

 

Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 (ProArt StudioBook 16 Series)
Processor
Intel Xeon W-11955M 8 x 2.6 GHz @ 5 GHz, 109 W PL2 / Short Burst, 90 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake H45
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU - 16384 MB, Core: 1350 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, 90 W TDP ( including 20 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, Optimus, Resizable BAR, NVIDIA 466.60, Intel UHD Graphics
Memory
65536 MB 
, Dual-Channel
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 283 PPI, ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel WM590 (Tiger Lake PCH-H)
Storage
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0), 4096 GB 
, 3600 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake PCH-H - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SD
Networking
Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 21.4 x 362 x 264 ( = 0.84 x 14.25 x 10.39 in)
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4-cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes
Weight
2.4 kg ( = 84.66 oz / 5.29 pounds), Power Supply: 764 g ( = 26.95 oz / 1.68 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
12/2021
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg21.4 mm16.00"3840x2400
90.3 %
10/2021
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
i9-11950H, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg25.9 mm15.60"3840x2160
87.3 %
08/2021
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
1.9 kg18 mm15.60"3840x2160
88.3 %
10/2021
Dell Precision 5000 5560
i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
2 kg18 mm15.60"3840x2400

Case

Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H

The case of the Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 is very sturdy and with 2.4 kg it's relatively light for its size. The case is made of metal with coated magnesium alloy, which gives it a matte, glittery and also rougher surface. A special feature of the device is the Asus Dial Controller, which is embedded next to the trackpad and can, for example, make controlling some functions in image and video editing programs particularly precise. In addition, the Asus Dial Controller can be used for faster adjustment of the brightness or volume of the system. The design of the Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 is decent and looks very neat with the arrangement of the keyboard, trackpad and Asus Dial. What also stands out about the case are the high feet, which are supposed to provide the user with more comfort while typing. These higher feet cause the keyboard to be higher than the palm rest. Asus has also made a recess in the back center of the stand that allows more fresh air to pass through in order to optimize the cooling of the device.

With its 16-inch display and an overall height of only 2.1 centimeters, the Asus ProArt StudioBook is surprisingly slim. While the HP ZBook Fury with its smaller display is slightly narrower on the outside, it is almost half a centimeter taller than our device. Apart from the ZBook Fury, all rivals are clearly ahead in terms of weight.

Size comparison

362 mm / 14.3 inch 264 mm / 10.4 inch 21.4 mm / 0.843 inch 2.4 kg5.29 lbs357 mm / 14.1 inch 242.5 mm / 9.55 inch 25.9 mm / 1.02 inch 2.5 kg5.46 lbs354 mm / 13.9 inch 235 mm / 9.25 inch 18 mm / 0.709 inch 1.9 kg4.29 lbs344.72 mm / 13.6 inch 230.14 mm / 9.06 inch 18 mm / 0.709 inch 2 kg4.42 lbs
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Equipment

The notebook's ports are distributed on two sides: on the left side, there are Kensington Lock, USB-A 3.2 Gen.2, the power connector, HDMI 2.1, Thunderbolt 4, and a USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 port in addition to the cooling system's air vents. Air vents extend over the right side just like on the left. There is also a full-sized SD card reader, a 3.5 mm combo jack, USB-A 3.2 Gen.2 and Gigabit LAN on the right side. Both Thunderbolt 4 and the USB-C port support Power Delivery and allow connecting one display each. The ports are spaced far enough apart and do not affect user's comfort when all ports are occupied. There's only the cooling system's air vents are located on the notebook's back side.

Right side: SD card reader, 3.5 mm audio, USB-A 3.2 Gen.2, Gigabit LAN
Right side: SD card reader, 3.5 mm audio, USB-A 3.2 Gen.2, Gigabit LAN
Left side: 1 Kensington Lock, USB-A 3.2 Gen.2, power port, HDMI 2.1, 1 Thunderbolt 4, USB-C 3.2 Gen.2
Left side: 1 Kensington Lock, USB-A 3.2 Gen.2, power port, HDMI 2.1, 1 Thunderbolt 4, USB-C 3.2 Gen.2

SD Card Reader

The transfer rate of the integrated SD card reader is inferior in our pre-production device. Even the average data throughput is not achieved with our AV PRO 128 GB V60 reference memory card.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Precision 5000 5560
  (AV Pro V60)
196.9 MB/s ∼100% +188%
Average of class Workstation
  (60.6 - 220, n=26, last 2 years)
134 MB/s ∼68% +96%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
  (AV Pro V60)
75.6 MB/s ∼38% +11%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
  (AV Pro V60)
73.8 MB/s ∼37% +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
  (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
68.3 MB/s ∼35%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Precision 5000 5560
  (AV Pro V60)
198.4 MB/s ∼100% +129%
Average of class Workstation
  (83.7 - 244, n=25, last 2 years)
152 MB/s ∼77% +75%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
  (AV Pro V60)
88.64 MB/s ∼45% +2%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
  (AV Pro V60)
87.2 MB/s ∼44% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
  (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
86.7 MB/s ∼44%

Communication

The Intel Wi-Fi AX201 installed in our pre-production device cannot exploit its performance potential in our performance test and ends up 20 to 60 percent behind the average.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1419 (1169min - 1609max) MBit/s ∼100% +61%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1211 (954min - 1321max) MBit/s ∼85% +37%
Average of class Workstation
  (646 - 1595, n=34, last 2 years)
1193 MBit/s ∼84% +35%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=296)
1158 MBit/s ∼82% +31%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
981 (864min - 1044max) MBit/s ∼69% +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
884 (468min - 938max) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1382 (1340min - 1446max) MBit/s ∼100% +139%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1363 (1311min - 1453max) MBit/s ∼99% +135%
Average of class Workstation
  (579 - 1553, n=34, last 2 years)
1284 MBit/s ∼93% +122%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=296)
1254 MBit/s ∼91% +117%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1249 (1170min - 1318max) MBit/s ∼90% +116%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
579 (368min - 652max) MBit/s ∼42%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø579 (368-652)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø868 (468-938)

Webcam

The camera quality of the 720p webcam in our test device is very poor. Like the most competitors, it lacks image sharpness and color accuracy.

ColorChecker
22.5 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
27 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
28 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2: 18.37 ∆E min: 3.32 - max: 28.72 ∆E

Maintenance

The base plate can be easily removed by loosening ten cross screws. Inside users will have direct access to both RAM and SSD slots, which are fully occupied in our review unit. Accordingly, the fans can also be cleaned this way. It is worth mentioning that the cooling circuit also covers the chipset and even the RAM and SSDs have passive cooling. For the latter, there are additional heat conduction pads on the base plate.

Input devices: Professional work with Asus Dial

Keyboard

The keyboard of the Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 is characterized by a good pressure point. The keys have a normal size and feel very comfortable when typing despite the rougher surface. The keystroke clatter is rather discreet and is not perceived as annoying. The keyboard illumination can be adjusted in three levels. In addition, there is the Asus Dial Controller: thanks to the ergonomic edges of the round controller, settings can be made very precisely and also very quietly. For example, you can intuitively control the brush in Photoshop or easily change the layer via the dial. Zooming, navigating or adjusting the color balance or hue should be easy with the Dial Controller. Our image gallery shows a few examples of using the Dial Controller.

Keyboard
Keyboard
Keyboard illumination
Keyboard illumination
Asus Dial Controller
Asus Dial Controller
Sample applications from the Asus Dial Controller
Sample applications from the Asus Dial Controller
Sample applications Asus Dial Controller
Sample applications Asus Dial Controller
Sample applications Asus Dial Controller
Sample applications Asus Dial Controller
Sample applications Asus Dial Controller
Sample applications Asus Dial Controller
 
 

Touchpad

Touchpad
Touchpad

The touchpad of our pre-production sample offers the user a large surface as well as very good gliding properties. Similarly, multi-touch features such as scrolling or switching tabs work smoothly here. The special 3-button touchpad is suitable for 3D designers who need centered control for application functions such as panning, rotating or circling. Combined with the Asus Dial, these two features are a real dream team for creative professionals.

Display: World's first 4K OLED HDR panel in 16:10 format

Subpixel
Subpixel

Our review sample have 4K OLED HDR panel with a 16-inch screen diagonal and 16:10 aspect ratio. It makes a good impression at first glance and offers the typical advantages of OLED panels. Furthermore, it have very good factory calibration due to the Pantone certification and is thus perfectly suited for editing pictures and videos. The illumination of 96 percent is very good, only the maximum brightness could be better. Apart from that, we could detect PWM with DC dimming at a frequency of 240 Hz from a brightness level of 80 percent and below in the test. Competition can score some points too: for example, HP ZBook Fury is equipped with a non-reflective 120 Hz display and a much brighter panel. However, it also has some drawbacks, such as a grainy picture impression, more halos and a poorer calibration.

Since our pre-production sample has an OLED panel, there is no screen bleeding.

369
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
363
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
353
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
ATNA60YV02-0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 369 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 360.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 354 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.45 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 2.77
ΔE Greyscale 1.88 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
98.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
BOE0969, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
SDC4145, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Sharp LQ156R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.60
Display
-5%
-1%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
99.9
95.9
-4%
99.9
0%
94.9
-5%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
100
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
98.6
87.3
-11%
95.3
-3%
100
1%
Response Times
-545%
-13%
-1840%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2 ?(1, 1)
14.8 ?(7.6, 7.2)
-640%
2.4 ?(1, 1.4)
-20%
47.2 ?(25.2, 22)
-2260%
Response Time Black / White *
2 ?(1, 1)
11 ?(7.6, 3.4)
-450%
2.4 ?(1.1, 1.3)
-20%
30.4 ?(16.4, 14)
-1420%
PWM Frequency
240 ?(80)
240.4 ?(52)
0%
Screen
-40%
-36%
-24%
Brightness middle
353
626
77%
379.6
8%
501.5
42%
Brightness
360
589
64%
380
6%
467
30%
Brightness Distribution
96
87
-9%
95
-1%
83
-14%
Black Level *
0.58
0.44
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.45
5.41
-121%
5.15
-110%
4.73
-93%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.75
9.05
-141%
7.79
-108%
8.45
-125%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.77
0.6
78%
3.1
-12%
0.51
82%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.88
6.2
-230%
2.6
-38%
3.6
-91%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.66 83%
1.99 111%
2.08 106%
CCT
6441 101%
6101 107%
6166 105%
6447 101%
Contrast
1079
1140
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-197% / -116%
-17% / -23%
-622% / -321%

* ... smaller is better

Thanks to the 4K OLED HDR display, our pre-production sample offers an extremely high contrast and rich, deep blacks. The panel covers the DCI-P3 and sRGB color spaces completely and also delivers very good values in the AdobeRGB 1998 color space with a full 98.6%. In addition, there is a very high image sharpness which delivers a very good picture, which means that the display meets the requirements for professional graphics editing.

Grayscale
Grayscale
Grayscale calibrated
Grayscale calibrated
Saturation
Saturation
Saturation calibrated
Saturation calibrated
ColorChecker
ColorChecker
ColorChecker calibrated
ColorChecker calibrated

Our pre-production test sample is only suitable for outdoor use to a limited extent. With a brightness of 350 cd/m² and the glossy display, you already have a poor view even in the shade. Among the competition HP ZBook Fury can do better thanks to the installed IPS panel with a brightness of over 600 cd/m².

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz ≤ 80 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 20897 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Thanks to the built-in OLED HDR panel, the viewing-angles of Asus ProArt Studiobook Pro 16 OLED is stable even at very oblique angles.

Viewpoint
Viewpoint

Performance: Upper-class performance with sophisticated cooling

Asus does not make any compromises and relies on the latest and most powerful components that Intel and Nvidia currently offer for workstations. Therefore, a Intel Xeon W-11955 is at work inside in combination with 64 GB DDR4 RAM and 2 TB NVMe SSD Raid 0 array. The graphics load is distributed between Nvidia RTX A5000 and the Intel UHD Graphics based on the XE architecture. The installed working memory in our device is ECC RAM that clocks with 3200 MHz. Unfortunately, the SSD slots only support NVMe SSDs that use PCIe Gen.3. In view of the rest of the configuration, PCIe Gen.4 could have been more apropriate. It is questionable whether other configurations will be available, but that remains to be seen.

Processor

Let's now talk about the Tiger-Lake octa-core CPU, which was introduced in the 2nd quarter of 2021. The Intel Xeon W11955M, which is designed for mobile workstations, is manufactured in the new 10 nm SuperFin process and, in comparison to the Intel Core i9-11950H additionally offers support for ECC memory. The chip has a TDP of 45 watts, which was however configured higher in our test sample and increases to a permanent 54 watts depending on the application scenario. The processor cores can clock from 2.6 to 5 GHz and support DDR4-3200 memory.

In our Cinebench Multi endurance test, the performance is on the expected level and thus easily outperforms the HP ZBook Fury's Intel Core i9-11950H installed. On the one hand, this is also due to the installed cooling system, which is also designed for a combined TDP of 140W. We tested the device in the performance mode, which is available in Asus ProArt Creator Hub and dynamically adapts the cooling to the required tasks. For everyday tasks there is the standard mode, and app also allows to set the fans to full speed. However, this did not represent much added value in tests, apart from the necessity to wear the headset when the fans run at a permanently high 5,600 RPM. In battery mode, the system slows our device down from 54 to 15 watts, which is also noticeable in the performance. More details about the processor can be found in our CPU section

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M: Ø1771 (1747.11-1845.61)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H: Ø1775 (1695.06-1826.82)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H: Ø1806 (1765.46-1841.11)
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H: Ø1525 (1468.05-1546.97)
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H: Ø1803 (1759.48-1988.07)
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
14066 Points ∼100% +29%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
13012 Points ∼93% +20%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
12247 (11482min - 12246.8max) Points ∼87% +13%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
12166 (11410min - 12166.4max) Points ∼86% +12%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
10862 (10718min - 10862.2max) Points ∼77%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
10862 Points ∼77% 0%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
9779 (9273.99min - 9779.26max) Points ∼70% -10%
Average of class Workstation
  (4239 - 13387, n=20, last 2 years)
9203 Points ∼65% -15%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
1619 Points ∼100% +9%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1596 Points ∼99% +8%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
1575 Points ∼97% +6%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1569 Points ∼97% +6%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
1513 Points ∼93% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
1480 Points ∼91%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
1480 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (1162 - 1613, n=20, last 2 years)
1408 Points ∼87% -5%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
5055 Points ∼100% +19%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
4878 Points ∼96% +15%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
4669 Points ∼92% +10%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
4660 Points ∼92% +10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
4250 Points ∼84%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
4250 Points ∼84% 0%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
3826 Points ∼76% -10%
Average of class Workstation
  (1602 - 5180, n=35, last 2 years)
3241 Points ∼64% -24%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
634 Points ∼100% +12%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
618 Points ∼97% +9%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
610 Points ∼96% +7%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
610 Points ∼96% +7%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
583 Points ∼92% +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
568 Points ∼90%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
568 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (440 - 622, n=35, last 2 years)
521 Points ∼82% -8%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
2361 Points ∼100% +28%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
2148 (1832.59min - 2147.65max) Points ∼91% +16%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
1846 (1747.11min - 1845.61max) Points ∼78%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
1846 Points ∼78% 0%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1841 (1765.46min - 1841.11max) Points ∼78% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1827 (1695.06min - 1826.82max) Points ∼77% -1%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
1547 (1468.05min - 1546.97max) Points ∼66% -16%
Average of class Workstation
  (675 - 2192, n=38, last 2 years)
1389 Points ∼59% -25%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
254 Points ∼100% +10%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
241 Points ∼95% +5%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
238 Points ∼94% +3%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
236 Points ∼93% +3%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
232 Points ∼91% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
230 Points ∼91%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
230 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (180 - 244, n=37, last 2 years)
210 Points ∼83% -9%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Average of class Workstation
  (250 - 703, n=33, last 2 years)
401 Seconds * ∼100% -45%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
313 Seconds * ∼78% -13%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
276 Seconds * ∼69%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
276 Seconds * ∼69% -0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
261 Seconds * ∼65% +5%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
254 Seconds * ∼63% +8%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
249 Seconds * ∼62% +10%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
227 Seconds * ∼57% +18%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
57579 MIPS ∼100% +22%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
53205 MIPS ∼92% +13%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
50060 MIPS ∼87% +6%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
50050 MIPS ∼87% +6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
47264 MIPS ∼82%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
47264 MIPS ∼82% 0%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
44890 MIPS ∼78% -5%
Average of class Workstation
  (19147 - 53426, n=35, last 2 years)
37339 MIPS ∼65% -21%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
6174 MIPS ∼100% +18%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
5773 MIPS ∼94% +11%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
5755 MIPS ∼93% +10%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
5727 MIPS ∼93% +10%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
5640 MIPS ∼91% +8%
Average of class Workstation
  (4417 - 5773, n=35, last 2 years)
5296 MIPS ∼86% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
5222 MIPS ∼85%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
5222 MIPS ∼85% 0%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
10482 Points ∼100% +26%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
9856 Points ∼94% +18%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
8349 Points ∼80%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
8349 Points ∼80% 0%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
7286 Points ∼70% -13%
Average of class Workstation
  (3852 - 10081, n=32, last 2 years)
6757 Points ∼64% -19%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
1777 Points ∼100% +20%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1702 Points ∼96% +14%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
1632 Points ∼92% +10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
1487 Points ∼84%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
1487 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (1124 - 1702, n=32, last 2 years)
1388 Points ∼78% -7%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
17.1 fps ∼100% +28%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
15 fps ∼88% +12%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
14.5 fps ∼85% +8%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
14.2 fps ∼83% +6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
13.4 fps ∼78%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
13.4 fps ∼78% 0%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
12.6 fps ∼74% -6%
Average of class Workstation
  (5.24 - 15.8, n=34, last 2 years)
10.5 fps ∼61% -22%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Workstation
  (23 - 106, n=35, last 2 years)
52.5 s * ∼100% -128%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
52.2 s * ∼99% -127%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
49.3 s * ∼94% -114%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
48.6 s * ∼93% -111%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
48 s * ∼91% -109%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
40.5 s * ∼77% -76%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
23 s * ∼44%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
23 s * ∼44% -0%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Workstation
  (0.541 - 0.695, n=34, last 2 years)
0.588 sec * ∼100% -3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
0.57 sec * ∼97%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
0.57 sec * ∼97% -0%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
0.551 sec * ∼94% +3%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
0.544 sec * ∼93% +5%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
0.543 sec * ∼92% +5%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.533 sec * ∼91% +6%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
0.4981 sec * ∼85% +13%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
199.4 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
199 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
176 fps ∼88% -12%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
114.29 fps ∼57% -43%
Average of class Workstation
  (23.2 - 199, n=20, last 2 years)
94.5 fps ∼47% -53%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Siemens NX (snx-04)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
309.14 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
309 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
285.36 fps ∼92% -8%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
175.11 fps ∼57% -43%
Average of class Workstation
  (17 - 309, n=20, last 2 years)
134 fps ∼43% -57%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Medical (medical-03)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
58.71 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
58.7 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
56.94 fps ∼97% -3%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
33.98 fps ∼58% -42%
Average of class Workstation
  (7.5 - 58.7, n=20, last 2 years)
26.4 fps ∼45% -55%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Maya (maya-06)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
290.04 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
290 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
258.25 fps ∼89% -11%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
196.6 fps ∼68% -32%
Average of class Workstation
  (46.8 - 290, n=20, last 2 years)
150 fps ∼52% -48%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Energy (energy-03)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
67.93 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
67.9 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
55.05 fps ∼81% -19%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
29.44 fps ∼43% -57%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.77 - 71.6, n=20, last 2 years)
24.4 fps ∼36% -64%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Creo (creo-03)
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
140 fps ∼100% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
139.71 fps ∼100%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
135.96 fps ∼97% -3%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
91.49 fps ∼65% -35%
Average of class Workstation
  (23 - 140, n=20, last 2 years)
71.7 fps ∼51% -49%
SPECviewperf 2020 / CATIA (catia-06)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
98.82 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
98.8 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
93.56 fps ∼95% -5%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
53.54 fps ∼54% -46%
Average of class Workstation
  (10.6 - 106, n=20, last 2 years)
45.4 fps ∼46% -54%
SPECviewperf 2020 / 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
123.13 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
123 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
120.04 fps ∼97% -3%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
59.63 fps ∼48% -52%
Average of class Workstation
  (11.6 - 130, n=20, last 2 years)
56 fps ∼45% -55%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
92.5 fps ∼100% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
92.48 fps ∼100%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
72.76 fps ∼79% -21%
Average of class Workstation
  (31.2 - 92.5, n=6, last 2 years)
70.8 fps ∼77% -23%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
31.2 fps ∼34% -66%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Siemens NX (snx-04)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
172.24 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
172 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
151.31 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Workstation
  (14.4 - 172, n=6, last 2 years)
114 fps ∼66% -34%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
99.95 fps ∼58% -42%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Medical (medical-03)
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
23.6 fps ∼100% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
23.58 fps ∼100%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
21.42 fps ∼91% -9%
Average of class Workstation
  (9.93 - 23.6, n=6, last 2 years)
17.3 fps ∼73% -27%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
10.84 fps ∼46% -54%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Maya (maya-06)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
134.48 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
134 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
119.23 fps ∼89% -11%
Average of class Workstation
  (75.8 - 139, n=6, last 2 years)
113 fps ∼84% -16%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
79.29 fps ∼59% -41%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Energy (energy-03)
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
139 fps ∼100% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
138.69 fps ∼100%
Average of class Workstation
  (9.4 - 139, n=6, last 2 years)
57.9 fps ∼42% -58%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
39.3 fps ∼28% -72%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
9.4 fps ∼7% -93%
SPECviewperf 2020 / Creo (creo-03)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
89.76 fps ∼100% +1%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
88.6 fps ∼99% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
88.55 fps ∼99%
Average of class Workstation
  (49.8 - 102, n=6, last 2 years)
74.1 fps ∼83% -16%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
49.77 fps ∼55% -44%
SPECviewperf 2020 / CATIA (catia-06)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
57.93 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
57.9 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
52.96 fps ∼91% -9%
Average of class Workstation
  (22.3 - 64.2, n=6, last 2 years)
44.3 fps ∼76% -24%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
22.34 fps ∼39% -61%
SPECviewperf 2020 / 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
87.8 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M
 
87.8 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
76.96 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Workstation
  (30.5 - 87.8, n=6, last 2 years)
65.2 fps ∼74% -26%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H
30.46 fps ∼35% -65%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1846 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
291 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
230 Points
Help

System performance

The system performance is also - according to expectations - above that of all rivals. Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 has to admit defeat only to the desktop counterpart Schenker XMG Ultra 17 with the Intel Core i9 11900K and the Lenovo Thinkpad P1. We couldn't determine any problems with the system in everyday use and all tasks was implemented without delays. Only the slight difference between mains and battery operation is noticeable when opening and closing programs.

PCMark 10 / Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
7884 Points ∼100% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7156 Points ∼91% +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
6951 Points ∼88%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
 
6951 Points ∼88% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6789 Points ∼86% -2%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
6751 Points ∼86% -3%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6676 Points ∼85% -4%
Average of class Workstation
  (4096 - 7156, n=34, last 2 years)
5647 Points ∼72% -19%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
11050 Points ∼100% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10894 Points ∼99% +7%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10596 Points ∼96% +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
10145 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
 
10145 Points ∼92% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10037 Points ∼91% -1%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
9915 Points ∼90% -2%
Average of class Workstation
  (8059 - 10894, n=34, last 2 years)
9527 Points ∼86% -6%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
9827 Points ∼100% +10%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9005 Points ∼92% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
8971 Points ∼91%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
 
8971 Points ∼91% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8913 Points ∼91% -1%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8491 Points ∼86% -5%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
8461 Points ∼86% -6%
Average of class Workstation
  (6426 - 9604, n=34, last 2 years)
8094 Points ∼82% -10%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
12250 Points ∼100% +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10241 Points ∼84% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
10015 Points ∼82%
Average Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
 
10015 Points ∼82% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9967 Points ∼81% 0%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
9952 Points ∼81% -1%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8463 Points ∼69% -15%
Average of class Workstation
  (3221 - 10441, n=34, last 2 years)
6546 Points ∼53% -35%
PCMark 10 Score
6951 points
Help

DPC latencies

Since the intended use of our test device includes working with audio and video files, the DPC latencies could cause problems. The test showed a need for optimization in terms of latencies, and our device itself had dropped frames during our Youtube video test.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
1508 μs * ∼100% -1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
1493.1 μs * ∼99%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
759.4 μs * ∼50% +49%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
578 μs * ∼38% +61%

* ... smaller is better

Storage

The pre-production device theoretically supports 2x one M.2 NVMe SSD with PCIe 4.0, so it is questionable why Asus installs two SSDs with PCIe 3.0 in a RAID 0 configuration here. These perform rather mediocre in the AS SSD benchmark and Crystal DiskMark, and even the single PCIe 3.0 SSD in HP Zbook Fury is behind our configuration in some benchmark sections. Here, too, we see a need for optimization: Asus could rely on a PCIe 4.0 storage unit or should optimize the drivers.

Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Average 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
38%
174%
44%
110%
0%
Write 4K
105.62
96.34
-9%
240
127%
110.5
5%
172.4
63%
106
0%
Read 4K
50.24
51.49
2%
87.85
75%
51.75
3%
78.81
57%
50.2
0%
Write Seq
445.57
1942
336%
4281
861%
2071
365%
2991
571%
446
0%
Read Seq
752.99
2504
233%
4228
461%
2505
233%
3351
345%
753
0%
Write 4K Q32T1
2713.36
346.6
-87%
695.8
-74%
429.8
-84%
459.2
-83%
2713
0%
Read 4K Q32T1
2398.74
408
-83%
777.7
-68%
418.3
-83%
484.3
-80%
2399
0%
Write Seq Q32T1
5378.26
3019
-44%
5195
-3%
3060
-43%
4761
-11%
5378
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
6189.48
3514
-43%
7099
15%
3539
-43%
7071
14%
6189
0%
AS SSD
-21%
80%
14%
35%
85%
0%
Seq Read
4316.58
2937.18
-32%
5010
16%
2953.49
-32%
5169.46
20%
4526.16
5%
4317
0%
Seq Write
2036.73
1687.88
-17%
3974.46
95%
1690.74
-17%
1986.47
-2%
3988.41
96%
2037
0%
4K Read
48.97
44.27
-10%
51.87
6%
43.98
-10%
78.03
59%
82.9
69%
49
0%
4K Write
112.4
105.76
-6%
156.83
40%
105.45
-6%
214.56
91%
207.46
85%
112
0%
4K-64 Read
1252.71
872.54
-30%
2611
108%
1065.05
-15%
1232.23
-2%
2751.44
120%
1253
0%
4K-64 Write
1473.4
1996.3
35%
3859.28
162%
1957.38
33%
2719.4
85%
3269.73
122%
1473
0%
Access Time Read *
0.045
0.048
-7%
0.072
-60%
0.04
11%
0.024
47%
0.024
47%
0.045
-0%
Access Time Write *
0.083
0.107
-29%
0.026
69%
0.105
-27%
0.059
29%
0.021
75%
0.083
-0%
Score Read
1765
1211
-31%
3164
79%
1404
-20%
1827
4%
3287
86%
1765
0%
Score Write
1722
2271
32%
4414
156%
2232
30%
3133
82%
3876
125%
1722
0%
Score Total
4256
4046
-5%
9134
115%
4297
1%
5753
35%
8821
107%
4256
0%
Copy ISO MB/s
2441.16
901.28
-63%
3423.99
40%
2473.57
1%
3201.07
31%
2441
0%
Copy Program MB/s
395.73
118.67
-70%
1091.1
176%
1073.8
171%
415.77
5%
396
0%
Copy Game MB/s
1115.47
371.95
-67%
2365.08
112%
1929.44
73%
1211.99
9%
1115
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
9% / 0%
127% / 114%
29% / 25%
73% / 62%
85% / 85%
0% / 0%

* ... smaller is better

2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6189.48 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5378.26 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 2398.74 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 2713.36 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 752.99 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 445.57 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 50.24 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 105.62 MB/s

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

03156309451260157518902205252028353150346537804095441047255040535556705985Tooltip
: Ø5970 (2469.7-6250.43)

Graphics card

Thanks to the installed cooling system and a TDP of up to 110 watts, the RTX A5000 with its 16 GB VRAM is convincing in terms of pure graphics performance and thus ranks 15 to 20 percent ahead of the HP ZBook Fury in the synthetic benchmarks.

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900K
30650 Points ∼100% +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
28939 Points ∼94% +6%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
28687 Points ∼94% +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
27271 Points ∼89%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (23579 - 29610, n=3)
26820 Points ∼88% -2%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
23579 Points ∼77% -14%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
21399 Points ∼70% -22%
Average of class Workstation
  (3169 - 29610, n=36, last 2 years)
13624 Points ∼44% -50%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900K
13144 Points ∼100% +28%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
12055 Points ∼92% +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900H
11424 Points ∼87% +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
10307 Points ∼78%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (8242 - 11580, n=3)
10043 Points ∼76% -3%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
8242 Points ∼63% -20%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
7909 Points ∼60% -23%
Average of class Workstation
  (988 - 11580, n=36, last 2 years)
5118 Points ∼39% -50%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900K
15128 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
13435 Points ∼89%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
 
13435 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (6201 - 13435, n=2, last 2 years)
9818 Points ∼65% -27%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11900K
7967 Points ∼100% +17%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
7754 Points ∼97% +13%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
6833 Points ∼86%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (5816 - 6833, n=2)
6325 Points ∼79% -7%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
5816 Points ∼73% -15%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
5438 Points ∼68% -20%
Average of class Workstation
  (1673 - 6833, n=15, last 2 years)
4245 Points ∼53% -38%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
22819 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
12825 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
10157 points
Help

Gaming performance

Although our pre-production device is not optimized for gaming, it still manages most titles in QHD. However, the display is limited to the 60 Hz. Among the competitors only real gaming powerhouses - like the Schenker XMG Ultra - can clearly outperform our review sample. Overall, the gaming performance of the Asus ProArt Studiobook Pro 16 is on the lower level of an RTX 3080.

As expected, the gaming performance is very limited on battery power.

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
242 (65.9min, 93.8P0.1, 168P1 - 419max) fps ∼100% +95%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
174 (141min) fps ∼72% +40%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
154.2 (135min - 171max) fps ∼64% +24%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (124 - 179, n=3)
151 fps ∼62% +22%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
149.5 (141min - 165max) fps ∼62% +21%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
124 fps ∼51%
Average of class Workstation
  (18.7 - 199, n=31, last 2 years)
97.9 fps ∼40% -21%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
92.4 (86min - 97max) fps ∼38% -25%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
123 (64.1min, 75.8P0.1, 90.7P1 - 241max) fps ∼100% +37%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
93.8 (75min) fps ∼76% +4%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (81.7 - 98.3, n=3)
90 fps ∼73% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
89.9 (87min, 88P1 - 93max) fps ∼73%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
81.7 (78min - 87max) fps ∼66% -9%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
81.5 (72min - 87max) fps ∼66% -9%
Average of class Workstation
  (10.8 - 110, n=33, last 2 years)
56.2 fps ∼46% -37%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
50 (48min - 53max) fps ∼41% -44%
GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
164 (5.22min, 100P1 - 283max) fps ∼100% +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
158 (3.82min, 90.9P1 - 384max) fps ∼96%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (131 - 161, n=3)
150 fps ∼91% -5%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
131 (11.7min, 35.7P1 - 238max) fps ∼80% -17%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
112 (15.5min, 55.6P1 - 225max) fps ∼68% -29%
Average of class Workstation
  (29.1 - 164, n=13, last 2 years)
109 fps ∼66% -31%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
98.5 (17.3min, 62.5P1 - 209max) fps ∼100% +15%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
85.8 (21.2min, 52.6P1 - 178max) fps ∼87%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (76.1 - 94.6, n=3)
85.5 fps ∼87% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
76.1 (5.43min, 28.6P1 - 148max) fps ∼77% -11%
Average of class Workstation
  (13.3 - 94.6, n=13, last 2 years)
59.2 fps ∼60% -31%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
57.8 (7.07min, 23.3P1 - 124max) fps ∼59% -33%
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
82.3 (16.3min, 58.8P1 - 145max) fps ∼100% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
82.2 (16min, 55.6P1 - 163max) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (70.4 - 84.3, n=3)
79 fps ∼96% -4%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
70.4 (4.81min, 27.8P1 - 144max) fps ∼86% -14%
Average of class Workstation
  (9.13 - 84.3, n=9, last 2 years)
51.5 fps ∼63% -37%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
42.9 (5.15min, 17.9P1 - 97.1max) fps ∼52% -48%
3840x2160 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
44.4 (10.1min, 30.3P1 - 95.9max) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (42.1 - 44.4, n=2)
43.3 fps ∼98% -2%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
42.1 (7.59min, 25.6P1 - 95.2max) fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Workstation
  (4.44 - 44.4, n=5, last 2 years)
27.4 fps ∼62% -38%
3840x2160 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:FX AF:8x
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
86.5 (25.9min, 62.5P1 - 195max) fps ∼100% +13%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (75.5 - 92.5, n=3)
81.4 fps ∼94% +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
76.3 (29.3min, 47.6P1 - 184max) fps ∼88%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
75.5 (13.9min, 28.6P1 - 195max) fps ∼87% -1%
Average of class Workstation
  (8.82 - 92.5, n=7, last 2 years)
58.1 fps ∼67% -24%
Dota 2 Reborn
3840x2160 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
118 (97.8min) fps ∼100%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
110 (8.5min) fps ∼93% -7%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (95 - 118, n=2)
107 fps ∼91% -9%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
95 (57.1min) fps ∼81% -19%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
93.1 (67.6min) fps ∼79% -21%
Average of class Workstation
  (21 - 118, n=18, last 2 years)
73.1 fps ∼62% -38%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
62.9 (57.3min) fps ∼53% -47%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
156 (137.1min) fps ∼100% +33%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
131 (113.6min) fps ∼84% +12%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
131 (112.8min) fps ∼84% +12%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (117 - 131, n=2)
124 fps ∼79% +6%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
119 (102min) fps ∼76% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
117 (97min) fps ∼75%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
116.3 (90.8min) fps ∼75% -1%
Average of class Workstation
  (13.8 - 132, n=32, last 2 years)
97.3 fps ∼62% -17%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
161 (140.5min) fps ∼100% +30%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
146 (120.5min) fps ∼91% +18%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
140 (121.3min) fps ∼87% +13%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
135.8 (95.1min) fps ∼84% +10%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (124 - 140, n=2)
132 fps ∼82% +6%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
130 (112.5min) fps ∼81% +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
124 (103.4min) fps ∼77%
Average of class Workstation
  (19.5 - 142, n=32, last 2 years)
106 fps ∼66% -15%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
3840x2160 High Quality
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
42.9 (27min) fps ∼100% +5%
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (35.4 - 51.1, n=3)
42.5 fps ∼99% +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
41 fps ∼96%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
36.2 fps ∼84% -12%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
35.4 fps ∼83% -14%
Average of class Workstation
  (4.64 - 51.1, n=12, last 2 years)
27.4 fps ∼64% -33%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
19.3 fps ∼45% -53%
2560x1440 High Quality
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (62.6 - 83.6, n=3)
72.3 fps ∼100% +2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
71.2 (44min) fps ∼98% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
70.6 fps ∼98%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
62.6 fps ∼87% -11%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
61.3 fps ∼85% -13%
Average of class Workstation
  (8.33 - 83.6, n=13, last 2 years)
45.3 fps ∼63% -36%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
34.4 fps ∼48% -51%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
  (81.1 - 108, n=3)
93.6 fps ∼100% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
91.8 fps ∼98%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
88 (56min) fps ∼94% -4%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
81.1 fps ∼87% -12%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
78.5 fps ∼84%