HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Laptop Review: More Options Than Ever Before
As its name suggests, the HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 is the successor to the ZBook Studio 15 G7 with updated processors and new features not available on previous models. The new model also replaces the ZBook Create G7 which was essentially the same laptop as the ZBook Studio G7 albeit with GeForce instead of Quadro graphics. Thus, the ZBook Studio G8 has consolidated and inherited all the configurations of the two older G7 models for a long list of configurable options ranging from vPro to non-vPro Tiger Lake-H CPUs and both Quadro and GeForce GPUs.
Our test unit is a higher-end configuration equipped with the vPro-enabled Core i9-11950H CPU, RTX 3070 GPU, and 4K OLED touchscreen for approximately $4200 USD retail. Lesser SKUs with the Core i7-11800H, integrated Iris Xe graphics only, FHD display, or Quadro T1200 graphics are available for significantly less. There are no Xeon options, however.
Direct competitors include other ultrathin Core-H-powered mobile workstations like the MSI WS66, Razer Blade 15 Studio, Asus ProArt, or the Lenovo ThinkPad P15s.
More HP reviews:
potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87.8 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 83.8 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2021 | HP ZBook Firefly 15 G8 2C9R7EA i7-1165G7, T500 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 19.2 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 90.6 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2021 | HP ZBook Studio G7 i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | 2 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 87.8 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2020 | Dell Precision 7550 W-10885M, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | 2.8 kg | 27.36 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 85.3 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE i7-1165G7, T500 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 19.1 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 83.1 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2020 | Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | 2 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 |
Case — Visually Identical to the ZBook 15 G7
HP hasn't changed the external chassis design and so our original comments on the ZBook Studio 15 G7 also apply here. Instead, the changes are internal including optional per-key RGB lighting and a revised cooling solution to pull in more air than on last year's model.
The model continues to be one of the smallest 15.6-inch workstations available with Core-H series CPUs and GeForce/Quadro-level graphics despite its "old" chassis design. It's even smaller than the ZBook Firefly G8 which comes with slower internals than our ZBook Studio G8.
It's worth noting that touchscreen SKUs are ever-so-slightly thicker than the non-touch SKUs by one one-hundredth of an inch (0.70" vs. 0.69").
Connectivity — Now With Thunderbolt 4
Port options are fewer than on the Dell Precision 7550 as the latter integrates everything on the ZBook Studio G8 plus gigabit RJ-45, HDMI, and an extra USB-A port. Users will have to take advantage of the two integrated Thunderbolt 4 ports to fully exploit the docking capabilities of the HP system.
Port positioning is a bit tight between the proprietary AC adapter barrel port and the two USB-C ports along the right edge. Thicker cables or USB-C devices may block access to the adjacent ports.
SD Card Reader
HP has actually downgraded the SD card reader this year. Moving 1 GB of images from our UHS-II test card to desktop takes around 14 seconds compared to less than half that on the ZBook Studio G7. We're not sure why HP would do this, but it's disappointing nonetheless especially for content creators who rely on the card reader.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Precision 7550 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ZBook Studio G7 (AV Pro V60) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 (AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE (AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Precision 7550 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ZBook Studio G7 (AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE (AV Pro V60) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 (AV Pro V60) | |
Communication
The Intel AX201 comes standard for Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2 connectivity. Transfer rates are stable at around 1400 Mbps in both directions when paired to our Netgear RAX200 test router.
Webcam
Security
HP has a entire suite of software and low-level protective measures including Sure Click, Secure Erase, BIOSphere, Sure Start, Sure Run, Tamper Lock, optional Sure View, and many more on top of the usual fingerprint reader and TPM. A simple webcam shutter is blatantly missing, however, which we feel is a massive oversight on HP's part.
Maintenance
The bottom panel requires a Philips screwdriver and sharp edge to pry open. There's not much to upgrade once inside, however, as the RAM and WLAN modules are soldered.
Accessories and Warranty
The retail box includes no extras outside of the AC adapter and paperwork. A base one-year warranty comes standard instead of the two-year or three-year warranty that high-end workstations tend to offer at no additional cost.
Input Devices — We Miss The Dedicated Mouse Keys and TrackPoint
Keyboard
Higher-end HP models like the Envy, Spectre, EliteBook, or ZBook have some of the best keyboards in the laptop market. Their keys tend to be crisper and deeper for stronger feedback and a more satisfying typing experience. The main drawback is the louder key clatter when compared to the softer and quieter keys of the MSI WS66 or Razer Blade Studio.
Touchpad
The smooth clickpad (11.5 x 7.3 cm) lacks dedicated buttons unlike on the ZBook Firefly, ZBook Fury, and most other traditional mobile workstations for that matter. Nonetheless, the clickpad isn't nearly as spongy as on the Razer Blade Studio for more reliable clicking and multi-touch inputs.
Display — OLED Has Some Drawbacks
Whereas HP uses LG for its 4K IPS option, this 4K OLED option comes from Samsung instead. The biggest advantages of OLED are its perfect black levels, wider gamut, and extremely fast black-white and gray-gray response times for livelier colors and essentially zero ghosting.
On the other hand, the main drawbacks to this OLED panel are its 400-nit brightness, 60 Hz refresh rate, presence of pulse-width modulation, and higher power consumption than IPS. While 400 nits is not dim by any means, it is the dimmest option available for this model. Similarly, the 60 Hz refresh rate isn't necessarily slow, but HP offers 120 Hz only for IPS. Pulse-width modulation or screen flickering is present at frequencies of 240 Hz and 59 Hz at brightness levels of 0 to 52 percent and 53 percent and 99 percent, respectively, which may cause eyestrain to some users. And finally, the higher power consumption is a known fact as detailed here on other laptops that use similar OLED technology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 379.6 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.15 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.1
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.99
| HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 SDC4145, OLED, 15.6", 3840x2160 | HP ZBook Firefly 15 G8 2C9R7EA LGD069B, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP ZBook Studio G7 LGD0661, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Dell Precision 7550 AU Optronics B156ZAN, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE MNF601EA1-1, IPS LED, 15.6", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -20% | -4% | -5% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 68.6 -31% | 98.2 -2% | 82.1 -18% | 84.5 -15% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 98.5 -1% | 99.9 0% | 99.6 0% | 98.7 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 95.3 | 70 -27% | 86.5 -9% | 96.8 2% | 97.8 3% |
| Response Times | -1733% | -1859% | -1675% | -1217% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.4 ? | 56 ? -2233% | 56.4 ? -2250% | 51.2 ? -2033% | 40 ? -1567% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 2.4 ? | 32 ? -1233% | 37.6 ? -1467% | 34 ? -1317% | 23.2 ? -867% |
| PWM Frequency | 240.4 ? | ||||
| Screen | -30% | 59% | -11% | 57% | |
| Brightness middle | 379.6 | 397 5% | 723 90% | 473.5 25% | 604 59% |
| Brightness | 380 | 402 6% | 707 86% | 461 21% | 609 60% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 84 -12% | 92 -3% | 90 -5% | 91 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.13 | 0.35 | 0.55 | 0.34 | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.15 | 5.9 -15% | 1.4 73% | 4.8 7% | 0.9 83% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.79 | 9.4 -21% | 2.9 63% | 8.73 -12% | 2.6 67% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.1 | 1.1 65% | 0.5 84% | 3.08 1% | 0.8 74% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 8.8 -238% | 2 23% | 5.6 -115% | 1.1 58% |
| Gamma | 1.99 111% | 2.47 89% | 2.14 103% | 2.34 94% | 2.15 102% |
| CCT | 6166 105% | 6416 101% | 6484 100% | 7549 86% | 6656 98% |
| Contrast | 3054 | 2066 | 861 | 1776 | |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.7 | 77.3 | 86.4 | 84.5 | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.5 | 99.9 | 99.7 | 98.6 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -594% /
-311% | -601% /
-276% | -564% /
-287% | -388% /
-171% |
* ... smaller is better
OLED typically offers deeper colors than IPS and our ZBook Studio G8 is no exception. Users will be getting full DCI-P3 coverage as opposed to only sRGB on most lower resolution 1080p panels.
X-Rite colorimeter measurements show color temperature to be slightly on the warm side at around 6200K instead of the usual 6500K on most other calibrated displays that target sRGB. Unlike on most Dell Precision models, HP has no pre-installed software here designed specifically for adjusting colors.
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.4 Hz | ≤ 52 % brightness setting |   |
The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 52 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
The glossy overlay contributes to noticeable glare when outdoors as shown by the pictures below. Users who plan on using the laptop outdoors on a frequent basis should consider upgrading to the 1000-nit panel option. Based on our experience with 1000-nit panels from HP, the real-world maximum brightness will be closer to 700 nits instead of 1000 nits which would still be nearly two times brighter than our base 400-nit panel. Only the FHD IPS panel is available with the 1000-nit configuration, however.
Performance — Lots to Choose From
CPU options include the 11th gen Intel Core i7-11800H or i9-11900H alongside their respective i7-11850H or i9-11950H vPro equivalents. These are some of the fastest octa-core Core H-series CPUs from Intel at the moment rivaling the AMD Ryzen 9 series like the 5900HX.
The GeForce RTX 3070 in our system is an 85 W TGP variant compared to the more common 100 W or higher version on most other laptops. Performance will therefore be slightly slower which our GPU benchmarks below will show. In fact, it is technically a "Max-Q" part according to the Nvidia Control Panel. Both Optimus 1.0 and Resizable Bar are supported.
Processor
As expected, CPU performance is ever-so-slightly below that of the Core i9-11900H due to the performance overhead required for vPro support. Gen-to-gen, raw multi-thread performance is about 20 to 25 percent faster than the older Core i9-10885H in the ZBook Studio G7.
Performance sustainability is stable with no major dips over time when running CineBench R15 xT in a continuous loop.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
| Average Intel Core i9-11950H (12048 - 13113, n=4) | |
| HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
| Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED | |
| HP ZBook Studio G7 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Average Intel Core i9-11950H (1569 - 1633, n=4) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
| HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
| HP ZBook Studio G7 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-11950H (1623 - 1702, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
| Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
| HP ZBook Studio G7 | |
| MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
| Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
| Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
| MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
| Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
| Average Intel Core i9-11950H (7286 - 8152, n=3) | |
| HP ZBook Studio G7 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
| HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
| HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-11950H (13.8 - 14.5, n=4) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
| MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
| HP ZBook Studio G7 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED | |
| Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP ZBook Studio G7 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T | |
| HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-11950H (38.6 - 53.2, n=4) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
| MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
| Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
* ... smaller is better
System Performance
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 | |
| Dell Precision 7550 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 15 G8 2C9R7EA | |
| HP ZBook Studio G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE | |
| Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 | |
| Dell Precision 7550 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 15 G8 2C9R7EA | |
| Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T | |
| HP ZBook Studio G7 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 15 G8 2C9R7EA | |
| HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 | |
| Dell Precision 7550 | |
| Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T | |
| HP ZBook Studio G7 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 | |
| Dell Precision 7550 | |
| HP ZBook Studio G7 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 15 G8 2C9R7EA | |
| Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6751 points | |
Help | ||
DPC Latency
LatencyMon reveals latency issues when opening multiple browser tabs on our homepage and also when running Prime95 stress. 4K video playback at 60 FPS is otherwise smooth with just 2 dropped frames during our minute-long test video.
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Dell Precision 7550 | |
| HP ZBook Studio G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE | |
| Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T | |
| HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 15 G8 2C9R7EA | |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
There is just a single internal M.2 2280 PCIe 3 x4 slot with no secondary options. Though we can understand the limited space available, it would've been great to at least see an upgrade to PCIe 4 especially for such a pricey system. Our specific test unit comes with the Samsung MZVLB2T0HALB for fast sequential read and write rates of 3500 MB/s and 3000 MB/s, respectively. HP offers optional SED SSDs as an added layer of security.
| HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB | HP ZBook Firefly 15 G8 2C9R7EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | HP ZBook Studio G7 Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV | Dell Precision 7550 SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB | Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen2-20W6000GGE WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00 | Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -1% | -16% | -20% | 11% | 4% | |
| Seq Read | 2953 | 2599 -12% | 2548 -14% | 2028 -31% | 2796 -5% | 2702 -8% |
| Seq Write | 1691 | 1305 -23% | 1312 -22% | 1193 -29% | 2525 49% | 2348 39% |
| 4K Read | 43.98 | 49.65 13% | 45.38 3% | 42.31 -4% | 50.9 16% | 37.59 -15% |
| 4K Write | 105.4 | 128.1 22% | 83 -21% | 105.5 0% | 211.9 101% | 107.1 2% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1065 | 1157 9% | 935 -12% | 1128 6% | 1505 41% | 1491 40% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1957 | 1475 -25% | 2314 18% | 1537 -21% | 949 -52% | 1794 -8% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.04 | 0.057 -43% | 0.057 -43% | 0.069 -73% | 0.081 -103% | 0.046 -15% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.105 | 0.03 71% | 0.098 7% | 0.106 -1% | 0.019 82% | 0.034 68% |
| Score Read | 1404 | 1467 4% | 1235 -12% | 1373 -2% | 1835 31% | 1798 28% |
| Score Write | 2232 | 1734 -22% | 2528 13% | 1762 -21% | 1413 -37% | 2136 -4% |
| Score Total | 4297 | 3894 -9% | 4342 1% | 3801 -12% | 4177 -3% | 4835 13% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2474 | 3142 27% | 1768 -29% | 2302 -7% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 1074 | 126.1 -88% | 627 -42% | 564 -47% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1929 | 477.4 -75% | 1477 -23% | 1336 -31% | ||
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 1% | -9% | -8% | 22% | 106% | |
| Write 4K | 110.5 | 140.6 27% | 95.5 -14% | 121 10% | 237.6 115% | 1107 902% |
| Read 4K | 51.8 | 52.8 2% | 48.99 -5% | 42.16 -19% | 54.7 6% | 43.38 -16% |
| Write Seq | 2071 | 1844 -11% | 2001 -3% | 2150 4% | 2603 26% | 2387 15% |
| Read Seq | 2505 | 2108 -16% | 1600 -36% | 1755 -30% | 1889 -25% | 2431 -3% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 429.8 | 418 -3% | 410.2 -5% | 395.3 -8% | 505 17% | 340.7 -21% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 418.3 | 476.8 14% | 394.7 -6% | 381.8 -9% | 606 45% | 397.8 -5% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 3060 | 3064 0% | 3148 3% | 2730 -11% | 2795 -9% | 2390 -22% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3539 | 3289 -7% | 3227 -9% | 3468 -2% | 3448 -3% | 3502 -1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 0% /
-0% | -13% /
-13% | -14% /
-16% | 17% /
15% | 55% /
41% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance — 85 W TGP
Graphics performance is 10 to 15 percent slower than the average RTX 3070 laptop in our database. The deficit is wide enough that even some older RTX 2070 or RTX 3060 laptops like the Schenker XMG Core 15 can sometimes outperform our pricier RTX 3070 system. It's not a slow laptop by any means, but it could have certainly been faster based on our experience with dozens of other systems with the same RTX 3070 GPU.
Users can swap out the GeForce GPU for the Quadro RTX A3000 or A4000 to maximize CAD, CGI, and other workstation-specific workloads.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 22946 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 32051 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 19167 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 8050 points | |
Help | ||