Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS Laptop Review: AMD Zen 3 and 165 Hz 1440p Sweet Spot

AMD Ryzen 9 over Intel Core i9. Intel is no longer required for the ultimate gaming performance. Unlike the Strix Scar 15 G532, the Strix Scar 15 G533 has swapped all Intel Core options for liquid metal cooled AMD Ryzen processors alongside additional updates to the chassis, display, and graphics.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! English native speakers welcome!

News Writer - Details here

The Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 series is home to the company's premier 15.6-inch gaming laptops in contrast to the thinner ROG Zephyrus S15 series or bulkier 17.3-inch ROG Chimera series. It directly succeeds last year's Strix Scar 15 G532 by introducing several changes both inside and out including a switch from Intel to AMD Ryzen Zen 3 CPUs.

Our test unit is a higher-end configuration equipped with the Ryzen 9 5900HX CPU, 130 W GeForce RTX 3080 GPU, and WQHD display with 165 Hz refresh rate and 3 ms response times for about $3800 USD retail. Lesser SKUs are available with the Ryzen 7 4800H, RTX 3070, and 300 Hz FHD panel instead. A 17.3-inch version of our Strix Scar 15 G533 is also available called the Strix Scar 17 G733. 

Competitors to the Strix Scar 15 include other upper midrange to high-end 15.6-inch gaming laptops like the Razer Blade 15, MSI GE66, or Lenovo Legion C7.

More Asus reviews:

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS (Strix G533 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 8 x 3.3 - 4.6 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 80 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU - 8192 MB, Core: 1645 MHz, Memory: 1788 MHz, 130 W TDP, GDDR6, 471.11, Optimus
Memory
65536 MB 
, Avant DDR4-3200, 22-22-22-52, Dual-Channel, 2x SODIMM
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 188 PPI, BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1, IPS, BOE0973, glossy: no, 165 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Soundcard
AMD Raven/Renoir/Van Gogh/Cezanne/Rembrandt - HD Audio Controller
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), MediaTek MT7921 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 27.2 x 354 x 259 ( = 1.07 x 13.94 x 10.2 in)
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Additional features
Speakers: 2x 4 W speakers + 2x 2 W tweeters, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, AMD Radeon Software, Asus Armoury Crate, MyAsus, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.314 kg ( = 81.62 oz / 5.1 pounds), Power Supply: 721 g ( = 25.43 oz / 1.59 pounds)
Price
4000 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86 %
07/2021
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg27.2 mm15.60"2560x1440
84 %
07/2020
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2.4 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
85 %
07/2020
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2.4 kg23 mm15.60"1920x1080
89 %
07/2021
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2 kg16.99 mm15.60"1920x1080
85 %
06/2021
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg22.85 mm15.60"1920x1080
86 %
04/2021
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.3 kg19.9 mm15.60"1920x1080

Case — New, Less Plastic-y Look

Asus has revamped the chassis while keeping the familiar overall look of the Strix Scar series. The thick rear, large hinges, and front LEDs are still present, for example, but the rear is flatter and with a different texture while the front LEDs are shorter in length around the sides. The right edge of the keyboard deck is also flatter and now semitransparent which is an easy way to distinguish the newer ROG models from the older ones. When taken together, the changes make the system appear sleeker and more luxurious without dropping any of the original LED features.

All the chassis updates appear to be mostly visual and so rigidity feels about the same as on the G532 for better or worse. The G532 wasn't of poor quality or anything, but it would have been great to see noticeable improvements nonetheless that are more than just skin deep.

The new chassis is smaller in footprint than the older G532 while being slightly thicker by about 2 mm. It's still somewhat large, however, especially since the G532 was already thicker than many competing models including the Alienware m15 R5. Overall weight remains average for the category at around 2.3 kg.

The LED bar extends across the front edge and along two to three inches on the sides
The LED bar extends across the front edge and along two to three inches on the sides
Hinges are larger, more prominent, and stiffer than on most other gaming laptops
Hinges are larger, more prominent, and stiffer than on most other gaming laptops
Maximum hinge angle limited to ~130 degrees because of the thick rear
Maximum hinge angle limited to ~130 degrees because of the thick rear
Smooth matte outer lid has glossy spots to boost visual appeal
Smooth matte outer lid has glossy spots to boost visual appeal
ROG logo plate is slightly rubberized. The plate is customizable and can be removed
ROG logo plate is slightly rubberized. The plate is customizable and can be removed
Chassis has more superficial design features to set it apart from the flatter Razer Blade series
Chassis has more superficial design features to set it apart from the flatter Razer Blade series
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
360 mm / 14.2 inch 275 mm / 10.8 inch 24.9 mm / 0.98 inch 2.4 kg5.21 lbs354 mm / 13.9 inch 259 mm / 10.2 inch 27.2 mm / 1.071 inch 2.3 kg5.1 lbs358 mm / 14.1 inch 267 mm / 10.5 inch 23 mm / 0.906 inch 2.4 kg5.35 lbs359.34 mm / 14.1 inch 259.04 mm / 10.2 inch 19.9 mm / 0.783 inch 2.3 kg4.96 lbs356.2 mm / 14 inch 272.5 mm / 10.7 inch 22.85 mm / 0.9 inch 2.5 kg5.42 lbs355 mm / 14 inch 235 mm / 9.25 inch 16.99 mm / 0.669 inch 2 kg4.47 lbs

Connectivity — No Thunderbolt Unlike Intel

One of the USB-A ports along the left edge has been moved to the rear for the G533 series. All ports are otherwise identical gen-to-gen including the USB-C Gen. 2 port and lack of Thunderbolt support. It would have been great to at least see 10 Gbps RJ-45 instead of the standard 1 Gbps port.

Front: No ports
Front: No ports
Right: Asus Keystone
Right: Asus Keystone
Rear: USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2 w/ Power Delivery + DisplayPort, HDMI 2.0b, RJ-45 1 Gbps, AC adapter
Rear: USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2 w/ Power Delivery + DisplayPort, HDMI 2.0b, RJ-45 1 Gbps, AC adapter
Left: 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1, 3.5 mm combo audio
Left: 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1, 3.5 mm combo audio

Communication

Our unit shipped with the Wi-Fi 6-enabled MediaTek MT7921 instead of the Intel AX201 on last year's G532. The MediaTek is unfortunately a downgrade with transfer rates that are consistently slower than what we've recorded on most other laptops with the competing Intel module. Users can always remove the MediaTek module on the G533 for the faster Intel version if desired.

The WLAN module sits underneath one of the M.2 SSD slots
The WLAN module sits underneath one of the M.2 SSD slots
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1395 (879min - 1677max) MBit/s ∼100% +121%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1371 (925min - 1499max) MBit/s ∼98% +117%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1150 MBit/s ∼82% +82%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1076 (944min - 1117max) MBit/s ∼77% +71%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1057 (522min - 1214max) MBit/s ∼76% +68%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
MediaTek MT7921
631 (581min - 693max) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1670 MBit/s ∼100% +96%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1386 (1274min - 1446max) MBit/s ∼83% +63%
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1358 (992min - 1431max) MBit/s ∼81% +59%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1330 (711min - 1563max) MBit/s ∼80% +56%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1238 (1020min - 1354max) MBit/s ∼74% +45%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
MediaTek MT7921
852 (831min - 887max) MBit/s ∼51%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850887842858849851847836857866847848870860851853834857843848861833832831864841859837860870852887842858849851847836857866847848870860851853834857843848861833832831864841859837860870852581662645612617659628604670618660626649622630633600642618672615627587625643693611632627638Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø851 (831-887)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø632 (581-693)

Maintenance

The bottom panel is easily removable with only a Philips screwdriver and sharp edge. Keep in mind that the bottom panel is attached to the motherboard via two fragile ribbons unlike on most other laptops due to the RGB LED bar along the front edge of the chassis.

Strix Scar 15 G533QS
Strix Scar 15 G533QS
Strix Scar 15 G532LWS for comparison. Note the significantly smaller battery
Strix Scar 15 G532LWS for comparison. Note the significantly smaller battery

Accessories and Warranty

The retail box includes the Asus Keystone stick, two extra ROG logo plates for the rear corner of the chassis, and the usual paperwork and AC adapter. The standard one-year limited manufacturer warranty applies with extension options if purchased from Xotic PC.

Input Devices

Keyboard

Asus has completely revamped both the keyboard and clickpad from the older G532. The per-key RGB keyboard in particular is now optical-mechanical with a different layout and feel. Other OEMs have also been dabbling on similar mechanical switches like the latest Alienware laptops. These keys are louder and clickier which some gamers may appreciate, but this change also makes the laptop unfavorable for classrooms, libraries, dorms, and other environments where quieter keys are preferred.

Touchpad

The new clickpad is larger than the one on the G532 (13 x 7.7 cm vs. 10.9 x 6 cm) as Asus has dropped the dedicated mouse buttons in favor of the larger surface area. Feedback is on the weak side due to the very shallow travel in spite of the relatively loud click when pressed. Thus, actions like drag-and-drop are harder to perform this time around. Basic cursor control is otherwise roomier and more responsive than before due in part to the higher refresh rate of the display.

The matte keyboard deck, clickpad, and key caps will attract unsightly grease very quickly
The matte keyboard deck, clickpad, and key caps will attract unsightly grease very quickly
Interestingly, the virtual NumPad is white instead of red for this generation. Heavy numpad users should still invest in an external numpad with actual tactile keys
Interestingly, the virtual NumPad is white instead of red for this generation. Heavy numpad users should still invest in an external numpad with actual tactile keys
The new optical-mechanical keys have deeper travel and are much louder than the typical membrane-based keys
The new optical-mechanical keys have deeper travel and are much louder than the typical membrane-based keys
Keystone feature remains. Note the much larger directional keys when compared to the tiny ones on the G532
Keystone feature remains. Note the much larger directional keys when compared to the tiny ones on the G532

Display

The BOE NE156QHM-NY1 IPS panel as found on our G533QS is the first to appear in our database. The Schenker XMG Neo 15 comes with the slightly different NE156QHM-NY2 panel which has the same native 1440p resolution and 165 Hz refresh rate but a narrower color space (69 percent P3 instead of 98 percent). Our 1440p panel seemingly has it all including fast response times, deep colors, and high refresh rates. Contrast, however, could be a bit better at "only" 900:1.

AMD FreeSync is supported on the main panel.

Bottom bezel is thicker than on most other laptops
Bottom bezel is thicker than on most other laptops
Narrow side and top bezels at the cost of no integrated webcam
Narrow side and top bezels at the cost of no integrated webcam
Matte subpixel array. Images are just slightly grainier than a glossy alternative but not grainy enough to be a major distraction
Matte subpixel array. Images are just slightly grainier than a glossy alternative but not grainy enough to be a major distraction
Moderate-heavy uneven backlight bleeding along the bottom corner of our unit
Moderate-heavy uneven backlight bleeding along the bottom corner of our unit
328
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
292.9
cd/m²
278.7
cd/m²
304.3
cd/m²
260.3
cd/m²
257.6
cd/m²
292.8
cd/m²
250.7
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 328 cd/m² Average: 286.4 cd/m² Minimum: 14.41 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 76 %
Center on Battery: 304.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 922:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.76 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 2.38
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
85.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1, IPS, 15.60, 2560x1440
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS-Level, 15.60, 1920x1080
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
B156HAN, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE
BOW CQ NV156FHM-NY5, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Display
-15%
-16%
-18%
4%
Display P3 Coverage
97.6
69.95
-28%
68.04
-30%
66.9
-31%
91.87
-6%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
99.62
0%
99
-1%
97.1
-3%
99.84
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
85.3
71.41
-16%
69.83
-18%
69
-19%
99.54
17%
Response Times
12%
-1%
45%
52%
38%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14 (7.2, 6.8)
14.4 (6.8, 7.6)
-3%
16.4 (6.8, 7.6)
-17%
4.2 (2.6, 1.6)
70%
4 (1.2, 2.8)
71%
14 (7, 7)
-0%
Response Time Black / White *
12.4 (7.2, 5.2)
9.2 (4.8, 4.4)
26%
10.4 (6, 4.4)
16%
10 (5.2, 4.8)
19%
8.4 (4.4, 4)
32%
3 (1, 2)
76%
PWM Frequency
23580 (19)
Screen
31%
27%
20%
19%
-31%
Brightness middle
304.3
307.2
1%
291
-4%
353.4
16%
329
8%
440
45%
Brightness
286
301
5%
278
-3%
340
19%
321
12%
414
45%
Brightness Distribution
76
91
20%
91
20%
92
21%
92
21%
87
14%
Black Level *
0.33
0.21
36%
0.25
24%
0.31
6%
0.27
18%
0.42
-27%
Contrast
922
1463
59%
1164
26%
1140
24%
1219
32%
1048
14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.76
1.85
33%
1.19
57%
2.17
21%
2.78
-1%
6.32
-129%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.57
3.92
30%
3.04
45%
5.69
-2%
4.88
12%
9.96
-79%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.38
1.26
47%
1.05
56%
1.63
32%
4.13
-74%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4
2
50%
1.9
52%
3.4
15%
2.5
37%
7.56
-89%
Gamma
2.14 103%
2.15 102%
2.216 99%
2.2 100%
2.106 104%
2.64 83%
CCT
6844 95%
6479 100%
7018 93%
6830 95%
6201 105%
7681 85%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
65
70
76
88
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.7
92
99
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
9% / 19%
3% / 13%
16% / 15%
36% / 25%
4% / -14%

* ... smaller is better

Gamut covers sRGB entirely and approximately 98 percent of DCI-P3 to be more than enough for gaming purposes. This is one of the few laptop IPS panels with both fast response times and wide colors to be fit for gaming and content creation alike.

vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

X-Rite colorimeter measurements show color temperature to be slightly too cool which, fortunately, can be easily addressed with an end-user calibration. Average grayscale and color DeltaE values would sit at just 1.3 and 2.38, respectively, after calibration.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.2 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.2 ms rise
↘ 6.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15366 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

The 300-nit display is average for a gaming laptop and so outdoor visibility isn't particularly better or worse than most other models out there. However, remember to disable AMD Vari-Bright or else maximum brightness will automatically drop from 312 nits to just 247 nits when running on battery power.

Outdoors on a bright overcast day
Outdoors on a bright overcast day
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors on a bright overcast day
Outdoors on a bright overcast day
Wide IPS viewing angles. Contrast and colors degrade from extreme angles
Wide IPS viewing angles. Contrast and colors degrade from extreme angles

Performance — No Need For Intel

Asus is aiming squarely for enthusiast gamers as even the lowest-end configuration still comes with the powerful Ryzen 7 5800H and GeForce RTX 3070. The GPU is rated for a 115 W TGP + 15 W boost, but it is able to run consistently at 130 W when gaming on Turbo mode as our Stress Test section below will show. Our unit was set to Turbo mode prior to running any benchmarks for the highest possible scores.

We recommend owners become familiar with the Asus Armoury Crate software as important performance, graphics switching, and LED settings are toggled here.

There is no soldered RAM unlike on most Asus Zephyrus models.

 

Processor

Performance is essentially on par with the competing Core i9-11900H in both single-thread and multi-thread applications. Users downgrading to a Ryzen 7 5800H configuration will only lose about 10 to 15 percent multi-thread performance.

The Ryzen 9 5900HX is almost indistinguishable from the Ryzen 9 5900HS as both processors will more than likely be limited by the cooling solution of the laptop. The smaller Razer Blade 14, for example, comes with the same Ryzen 9 5900HX CPU as our Asus and yet it can perform between 6 to 17 percent slower.

Performance sustainability is excellent with consistent CineBench R15 xT results over time.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

0115230345460575690805920103511501265138014951610172518401955207021852197.22179.722170.142173.092167.792180.072174.52174.52172.382181.742172.612174.392169.082157.52167.792167.322176.162177.342174.272177.582181.382163.682175.922166.962168.962171.082176.162171.082184.842172.382175.572179.242176.162183.642187.232177.822179.482174.392181.382172.142172.52164.52169.082175.692170.732175.922174.272181.622175.692179.242009.652044.892051.492051.182051.812048.552055.392054.552054.442054.552052.862051.812057.612053.282056.342051.392048.452053.072052.972048.242048.242050.132056.132052.862051.492060.792052.762051.492056.032050.972056.342055.392056.242055.922050.232052.762056.452051.282051.182051.072056.242052.972054.652056.242056.032055.822053.182051.62053.392057.512220.872202.892208.112209.092222.962213.252213.612215.452215.582211.172209.092212.512213.492215.822217.052215.822212.512212.022221.242215.942222.592219.142211.92214.962216.932219.262215.822215.212217.912211.042216.072219.392220.87222022202220.372212.882217.172213.612213.372216.932219.142214.592218.032217.172216.82221.362214.232215.72222.471850.481828.741861.761866.111776.591868.811863.411870.031867.851873.891866.981868.721864.451864.711874.061876.521874.851870.31875.031869.771867.411871.171872.661871.351873.011861.761867.241874.331868.631867.151865.851869.951871.081860.721876.71873.711869.861866.021867.151869.861876.961871.261870.991870.31875.121872.481868.371870.121872.41863.152197.22179.722170.142173.092167.792180.072174.52174.52172.382181.742172.612174.392169.082157.52167.792167.322176.162177.342174.272177.582181.382163.682175.922166.962168.962171.082176.162171.082184.842172.382175.572179.242176.162183.642187.232177.822179.482174.392181.382172.142172.52164.52169.082175.692170.732175.922174.272181.622175.692179.242009.652044.892051.492051.182051.812048.552055.392054.552054.442054.552052.862051.812057.612053.282056.342051.392048.452053.072052.972048.242048.242050.132056.132052.862051.492060.792052.762051.492056.032050.972056.342055.392056.242055.922050.232052.762056.452051.282051.182051.072056.242052.972054.652056.242056.032055.822053.182051.62053.392057.512220.872202.892208.112209.092222.962213.252213.612215.452215.582211.172209.092212.512213.492215.822217.052215.822212.512212.022221.242215.942222.592219.142211.92214.962216.932219.262215.822215.212217.912211.042216.072219.392220.87222022202220.372212.882217.172213.612213.372216.932219.142214.592218.032217.172216.82221.362214.232215.72222.471850.481828.741861.761866.111776.591868.811863.411870.031867.851873.891866.981868.721864.451864.711874.061876.521874.851870.31875.031869.771867.411871.171872.661871.351873.011861.761867.241874.331868.631867.151865.851869.951871.081860.721876.71873.711869.861866.021867.151869.861876.961871.261870.991870.31875.121872.481868.371870.121872.41863.152197.22179.722170.142173.092167.792180.072174.52174.52172.382181.742172.612174.392169.082157.52167.792167.322176.162177.342174.272177.582181.382163.682175.922166.962168.962171.082176.162171.082184.842172.382175.572179.242176.162183.642187.232177.822179.482174.392181.382172.142172.52164.52169.082175.692170.732175.922174.272181.622175.692179.242009.652044.892051.492051.182051.812048.552055.392054.552054.442054.552052.862051.812057.612053.282056.342051.392048.452053.072052.972048.242048.242050.132056.132052.862051.492060.792052.762051.492056.032050.972056.342055.392056.242055.922050.232052.762056.452051.282051.182051.072056.242052.972054.652056.242056.032055.822053.182051.62053.392057.512220.872202.892208.112209.092222.962213.252213.612215.452215.582211.172209.092212.512213.492215.822217.052215.822212.512212.022221.242215.942222.592219.142211.92214.962216.932219.262215.822215.212217.912211.042216.072219.392220.87222022202220.372212.882217.172213.612213.372216.932219.142214.592218.032217.172216.82221.362214.232215.72222.471850.481828.741861.761866.111776.591868.811863.411870.031867.851873.891866.981868.721864.451864.711874.061876.521874.851870.31875.031869.771867.411871.171872.661871.351873.011861.761867.241874.331868.631867.151865.851869.951871.081860.721876.71873.711869.861866.021867.151869.861876.961871.261870.991870.31875.121872.481868.371870.121872.41863.15Tooltip
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø2175 (2157.5-2197.2)
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø2052 (2009.65-2060.79)
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø2216 (2202.89-2222.96)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H Intel Core i7-11800H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1867 (1776.59-1876.96)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
6381 Points ∼100% +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5214 Points ∼82%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
5160 Points ∼81% -1%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4876 Points ∼76% -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (2242 - 5476, n=15)
4875 Points ∼76% -7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
4706 Points ∼74% -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4553 Points ∼71% -13%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4380 Points ∼69% -16%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4288 Points ∼67% -18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3871 Points ∼61% -26%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
3721 Points ∼58% -29%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3271 Points ∼51% -37%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
2632 Points ∼41% -50%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
1954 Points ∼31% -63%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
603 Points ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points ∼97% +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
574 Points ∼95%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (471 - 584, n=14)
568 Points ∼94% -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
559 Points ∼93% -3%
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
532 Points ∼88% -7%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
495 Points ∼82% -14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
490 Points ∼81% -15%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
486 Points ∼81% -15%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
476 Points ∼79% -17%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
473 Points ∼78% -18%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
471 Points ∼78% -18%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
445 Points ∼74% -22%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
436 Points ∼72% -24%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
13519 (13222.6min - 13519.5max) Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12652 (12516min - 12651.7max) Points ∼94% -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (6622 - 14363, n=15)
12621 Points ∼93% -7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
12197 (11396.1min - 12197.5max) Points ∼90% -10%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
11267 Points ∼83% -17%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
10263 Points ∼76% -24%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
6852 Points ∼51% -49%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
5106 Points ∼38% -62%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
1513 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1469 Points ∼97%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1218 - 1498, n=14)
1460 Points ∼96% -1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1248 Points ∼82% -15%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1224 Points ∼81% -17%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1218 Points ∼81% -17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
1216 Points ∼80% -17%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
1147 Points ∼76% -22%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
2620 Points ∼100% +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
2211 (1875.21min - 2210.56max) Points ∼84% +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2197 (2157.5min - 2197.2max) Points ∼84%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1076 - 2267, n=14)
2070 Points ∼79% -6%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2061 (2009.65min - 2060.79max) Points ∼79% -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2019 (1786.91min - 2018.67max) Points ∼77% -8%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1909 (1812.99min - 1909.31max) Points ∼73% -13%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
1877 (1776.59min - 1876.96max) Points ∼72% -15%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
1863 Points ∼71% -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1733 (1604.75min - 1733.1max) Points ∼66% -21%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1728 Points ∼66% -21%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1418 Points ∼54% -35%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
1208 Points ∼46% -45%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
794.98 (767.11min - 794.98max) Points ∼30% -64%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
236 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
234 Points ∼99%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (197 - 242, n=10)
234 Points ∼99% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
233 Points ∼99% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
227 Points ∼96% -3%
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
224 Points ∼95% -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
211 Points ∼89% -10%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
200 Points ∼85% -15%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
199 Points ∼84% -15%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
197 Points ∼83% -16%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
193 Points ∼82% -18%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
188 Points ∼80% -20%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
187.32 Points ∼79% -20%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
176 Points ∼75% -25%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
536.6 Seconds * ∼100% -124%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
411 Seconds * ∼77% -71%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
337.2 Seconds * ∼63% -41%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
297 Seconds * ∼55% -24%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
292 Seconds * ∼54% -22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
279 Seconds * ∼52% -16%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
268 Seconds * ∼50% -12%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
259 Seconds * ∼48% -8%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
259 Seconds * ∼48% -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (219 - 442, n=14)
252 Seconds * ∼47% -5%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
251 Seconds * ∼47% -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
243 Seconds * ∼45% -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
240 Seconds * ∼45%
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
167.3 Seconds * ∼31% +30%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
5954 MIPS ∼100% +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (4791 - 5846, n=14)
5638 MIPS ∼95% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
5582 MIPS ∼94% 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5568 MIPS ∼94%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5558 MIPS ∼93% 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5525 MIPS ∼93% -1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
5480 MIPS ∼92% -2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
5310 MIPS ∼89% -5%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
5244 MIPS ∼88% -6%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
4839 MIPS ∼81% -13%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4791 MIPS ∼80% -14%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4638 MIPS ∼78% -17%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4634 MIPS ∼78% -17%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4414 MIPS ∼74% -21%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
70968 MIPS ∼100% +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
61422 MIPS ∼87%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (36011 - 62503, n=14)
57031 MIPS ∼80% -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
54156 MIPS ∼76% -12%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53767 MIPS ∼76% -12%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
53597 MIPS ∼76% -13%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
52370 MIPS ∼74% -15%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
50075 MIPS ∼71% -18%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
48577 MIPS ∼68% -21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
47806 MIPS ∼67% -22%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
46431 MIPS ∼65% -24%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
37625 MIPS ∼53% -39%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
36430 MIPS ∼51% -41%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
23493 MIPS ∼33% -62%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
1624 Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1271 - 1548, n=12)
1493 Points ∼92%
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
1449 Points ∼89%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1443 Points ∼89%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1368 Points ∼84%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
1296 Points ∼80%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1285 Points ∼79%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
1218 Points ∼75%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1203 Points ∼74%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
1202 Points ∼74%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1116 Points ∼69%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
882 Points ∼54%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
11414 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
9663 Points ∼85%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8586 Points ∼75%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
8073 Points ∼71%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (5057 - 9294, n=12)
8014 Points ∼70%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
7758 Points ∼68%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
7675 Points ∼67%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7621 Points ∼67%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
6586 Points ∼58%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
5739 Points ∼50%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
4314 Points ∼38%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
3323 Points ∼29%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
21 fps ∼100% +35%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.6 fps ∼74%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.3 fps ∼73% -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (8.26 - 17.1, n=14)
15.2 fps ∼72% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
15 fps ∼71% -4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
15 fps ∼71% -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
13.4 fps ∼64% -14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
13 fps ∼62% -17%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
12.9 fps ∼61% -17%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
12.9 fps ∼61% -17%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
12.193 fps ∼58% -22%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
10.4 fps ∼50% -33%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
9.82 fps ∼47% -37%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
6.93 fps ∼33% -56%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
92.05 s * ∼100% -76%
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
76.02 s * ∼83% -45%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
73.29 s * ∼80% -40%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
69.2 s * ∼75% -32%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
58.9 s * ∼64% -13%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
55.8 s * ∼61% -7%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
53.3 s * ∼58% -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
52.3 s * ∼57%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (44.1 - 58.9, n=14)
50 s * ∼54% +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
49.1 s * ∼53% +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
48.4 s * ∼53% +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
45.9 s * ∼50% +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
40.5 s * ∼44% +23%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.641 sec * ∼100% -31%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
0.61 sec * ∼95% -24%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.599 sec * ∼93% -22%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.586 sec * ∼91% -19%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.58 sec * ∼90% -18%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.575 sec * ∼90% -17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.565 sec * ∼88% -15%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.55 sec * ∼86% -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603H
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.544 sec * ∼85% -11%
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
0.528 sec * ∼82% -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (0.4907 - 0.599, n=14)
0.516 sec * ∼80% -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.512 sec * ∼80% -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4908 sec * ∼77%
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2197 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
152 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
234 Points
Help

System Performance

PCMark 10 results are consistently higher than on last year's Core i9-equipped G532 to be just shy of the latest Razer Blade 15. The system is designed to run demanding loads with aplomb.

PCMark 10 / Score
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7356 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
7201 Points ∼98%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (6807 - 7416, n=6)
7097 Points ∼96% -1%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
6465 Points ∼88% -10%
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6263 Points ∼85% -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)
6236 Points ∼85% -13%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6053 Points ∼82% -16%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
11064 Points ∼100% +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (10018 - 10593, n=6)
10288 Points ∼93% +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
10218 Points ∼92%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)
9897 Points ∼89% -3%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9813 Points ∼89% -4%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
9589 Points ∼87% -6%
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9117 Points ∼82% -11%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
10066 Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (8546 - 10066, n=6)
9451 Points ∼94% -6%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9015 Points ∼90% -10%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8913 Points ∼89% -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)
8613 Points ∼86% -14%
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8363 Points ∼83% -17%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
7641 Points ∼76% -24%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10831 Points ∼100% +10%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (9377 - 10582, n=6)
9990 Points ∼92% +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
9852 Points ∼91%
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8747 Points ∼81% -11%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8582 Points ∼79% -13%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8029 Points ∼74% -19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)
7722 Points ∼71% -22%
PCMark 10 Score
7201 points
Help

DPC Latency

LatencyMon shows minor DPC latency issues when opening multiple browser tabs on our homepage. 4K video playback at 60 FPS is otherwise smooth and with no dropped frames.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4392 μs * ∼100% -218%
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1761.5 μs * ∼40% -28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)
1474.8 μs * ∼34% -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1379.5 μs * ∼31%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
935.4 μs * ∼21% +32%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
428.6 μs * ∼10% +69%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

Our unit comes with a 2 TB ADATA Swordfish NVMe SSD in contrast to the Intel SSD on our older G532 unit. The manufacturer advertises sequential read and write rates of 1800 MB/s and 1200 MB/s, respectively, which we're able to confirm in our own tests. This makes the drive a midrange NVMe SSD as pricier drives like the WDC SN730 or Samsung PM981a can be two to three times faster.

CDM 8
CDM 8
AS SSD
AS SSD
Two accessible M.2 2280 PCIe 3 x4 slots
Two accessible M.2 2280 PCIe 3 x4 slots
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
AS SSD
55%
143%
188%
20%
86%
Seq Read
1756.8
1981.74
13%
2978.71
70%
5738.87
227%
2082
19%
2803.85
60%
Seq Write
1070.56
1444.37
35%
2580.63
141%
4201.49
292%
825
-23%
2765.17
158%
4K Read
22.07
50.29
128%
47.33
114%
53.78
144%
42.41
92%
44.96
104%
4K Write
124.24
120.14
-3%
140
13%
179.19
44%
98.28
-21%
98.35
-21%
4K-64 Read
439.41
1015.73
131%
1710.1
289%
2959.32
573%
1255.39
186%
1502.71
242%
4K-64 Write
650.68
1350.51
108%
2188.39
236%
1890.84
191%
737.69
13%
1845.36
184%
Access Time Read *
0.043
0.044
-2%
0.05
-16%
0.027
37%
0.109
-153%
0.058
-35%
Access Time Write *
0.341
0.109
68%
0.026
92%
0.154
55%
0.17
50%
0.038
89%
Score Read
637
1264
98%
2055
223%
3587
463%
1506
136%
1828
187%
Score Write
882
1615
83%
2586
193%
2490
182%
918
4%
2220
152%
Score Total
1814
3510
93%
5673
213%
7821
331%
3136
73%
4983
175%
Copy ISO MB/s
3219.58
3474.48
8%
3026.55
-6%
1390.81
-57%
1903.65
-41%
Copy Program MB/s
675.39
751.43
11%
1176.69
74%
644.79
-5%
567.18
-16%
Copy Game MB/s
1684.42
1684.01
0%
2170.34
29%
1101.18
-35%
1112.32
-34%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
43%
56%
170%
12%
55%
Write 4K
134.7
128.4
-5%
158.2
17%
295.6
119%
116.95
-13%
107.9
-20%
Read 4K
34.46
53.68
56%
50.66
47%
85.73
149%
44.56
29%
48.48
41%
Write Seq
1123
1875
67%
1790
59%
4149
269%
1551.63
38%
2910
159%
Read Seq
1691
2315
37%
2469
46%
4203
149%
1682.12
-1%
2015
19%
Write 4K Q32T1
580.8
427.2
-26%
503.2
-13%
714.8
23%
497.75
-14%
413
-29%
Read 4K Q32T1
423.6
440.7
4%
578.7
37%
708.7
67%
436.8
3%
468.9
11%
Write Seq Q32T1
1131
2793
147%
3102
174%
4681
314%
1461.4
29%
3016
167%
Read Seq Q32T1
1859
3101
67%
3413
84%
6905
271%
2363.9
27%
3533
90%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
49% / 51%
100% / 106%
179% / 182%
16% / 17%
71% / 75%

* ... smaller is better

ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1859 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1131 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 423.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 580.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1691 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1123 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 34.46 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 134.7 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201501.1416211624.141624.141625.41625.41625.611625.821626.231626.231626.651626.651626.861627.071627.071627.071627.071627.071627.281627.491627.71628.121628.231628.751628.961629.161629.581629.911630.211635.861637.121644.861646.541663.281664.541665.161666.421669.141669.351669.561670.811671.861672.491675.211675.631676.051683.161684.211692.41703.73Tooltip
: Ø1642 (1501.14-1703.73)

GPU Performance — 130 W GeForce RTX 3080

3DMark scores are about average for where we expect a GeForce RTX 3080 laptop to perform. The larger Schenker XMG Ultra 17 which comes with a more power-hungry 165 W RTX 3080 is able to outperform our 130 W GPU by about 15 percent. Users who downgrade to the RTX 3070 SKU is expected to lose about 15 percent in raw performance.

Upgrading from the RTX 2070 Super in last year's ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS to our RTX 3080 will see a performance boost of about 20 to 40 percent. It's not enough to come close to 165 FPS to fully exploit the 165 Hz 1440p display, but screen tearing and frame skips are generally less noticeable when average FPS is above 60 and especially when FreeSync is toggled on.

Running Fire Strike on Performance mode instead of Turbo mode would result in slightly lower Time Spy Physics and Graphics scores of 9960 and 10742 points, respectively, compared to 10140 and 11396 points when on Turbo.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Time Spy
Time Spy
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
Port Royal
Port Royal
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
40910 Points ∼100% +52%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K
30650 Points ∼75% +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (20538 - 32366, n=33)
28037 Points ∼69% +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
26956 Points ∼66%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK
22630 Points ∼55% -16%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
22200 Points ∼54% -18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
22183 Points ∼54% -18%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
21111 Points ∼52% -22%
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
18684 Points ∼46% -31%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
15499 Points ∼38% -43%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800HS
13870 Points ∼34% -49%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
17467 Points ∼100% +53%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K
13144 Points ∼75% +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
11396 Points ∼65%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (8920 - 13210, n=32)
11019 Points ∼63% -3%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK
8526 Points ∼49% -25%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
8407 Points ∼48% -26%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
8389 Points ∼48% -26%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
7677 Points ∼44% -33%
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
7093 Points ∼41% -38%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
5819 Points ∼33% -49%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800HS
5130 Points ∼29% -55%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
15712 Points ∼100% +40%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K
13067 Points ∼83% +17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
11188 Points ∼71%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (8737 - 13067, n=32)
10788 Points ∼69% -4%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK
8621 Points ∼55% -23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
8531 Points ∼54% -24%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
8446 Points ∼54% -25%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
7848 Points ∼50% -30%
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
7411 Points ∼47% -34%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
6161 Points ∼39% -45%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800HS
5461 Points ∼35% -51%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
47287 Points ∼100% +19%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K
41696 Points ∼88% +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
39782 Points ∼84%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (31288 - 43744, n=30)
38641 Points ∼82% -3%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK
31156 Points ∼66% -22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
30568 Points ∼65% -23%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
29289 Points ∼62% -26%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
27898 Points ∼59% -30%
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
24040 Points ∼51% -40%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
20535 Points ∼43% -48%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800HS
18653 Points ∼39% -53%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K
20233 Points ∼100% +23%
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK
17126 Points ∼85% +4%
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
17096 Points ∼84% +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (13526 - 20233, n=29)
16730 Points ∼83% +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
16501 Points ∼82%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
15770 Points ∼78% -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
15465 Points ∼76% -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
14508 Points ∼72% -12%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
13993 Points ∼69% -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800HS
13724 Points ∼68% -17%
3DMark 11 Performance
29985 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
45767 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
24231 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
11188 points
Help
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (148 - 228, n=2)
188 fps ∼100% +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
179 fps ∼95%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 199, n=19)
178 fps ∼95% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (151 - 158, n=2)
155 fps ∼82% -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (137 - 195, n=17)
154 fps ∼82% -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
 
150 fps ∼80% -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (124 - 161, n=14)
144 fps ∼77% -20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (121 - 137, n=4)
130 fps ∼69% -27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (98.4 - 144, n=4)
118 fps ∼63% -34%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (132 - 205, n=2)
169 fps ∼100% +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
139 fps ∼82%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (113 - 154, n=20)
136 fps ∼80% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (117 - 129, n=2)
123 fps ∼73% -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (67 - 142, n=18)
111 fps ∼66% -20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (100 - 106, n=3)
103 fps ∼61% -26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (88.4 - 112, n=14)
99.7 fps ∼59% -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (74 - 89.2, n=5)
82.3 fps ∼49% -41%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (78.1 - 87.6, n=5)
81.5 fps ∼48% -41%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (113 - 156, n=2)
135 fps ∼100% +29%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
105 fps ∼78%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (85.4 - 115, n=23)
103 fps ∼76% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (90.6 - 108, n=3)
99.2 fps ∼73% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (62 - 103, n=23)
85.5 fps ∼63% -19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (77 - 80.6, n=3)
78.6 fps ∼58% -25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (67.4 - 87.2, n=15)
76.4 fps ∼57% -27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (52 - 67.5, n=7)
61.8 fps ∼46% -41%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (55.4 - 63.9, n=5)
59 fps ∼44% -44%
GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (182 - 187, n=2)
185 fps ∼100% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (164 - 186, n=23)
181 fps ∼98% +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
177 (5.15min, 125P1 - 338max) fps ∼96%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (164 - 185, n=18)
177 fps ∼96% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (164 - 182, n=17)
176 fps ∼95% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (163 - 179, n=3)
173 fps ∼94% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (153 - 178, n=4)
171 fps ∼92% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
 
164 fps ∼89% -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (153 - 168, n=5)
160 fps ∼86% -10%
1920x1080 Lowest Settings possible
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (180 - 187, n=2)
184 fps ∼100% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (173 - 186, n=22)
180 fps ∼98% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (174 - 179, n=2)
177 fps ∼96% +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
176 (1.327min, 125P1 - 297max) fps ∼96%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (150 - 185, n=17)
174 fps ∼95% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (168 - 175, n=4)
173 fps ∼94% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (156 - 180, n=14)
171 fps ∼93% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (124 - 163, n=3)
148 fps ∼80% -16%
1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (175 - 187, n=2)
181 fps ∼100% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (167 - 182, n=19)
176 fps ∼97% +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
171 (5.18min, 111P1 - 302max) fps ∼94%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (153 - 180, n=14)
170 fps ∼94% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (152 - 178, n=14)
170 fps ∼94% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (156 - 172, n=3)
166 fps ∼92% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (143 - 171, n=5)
163 fps ∼90% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
 
160 fps ∼88% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (133 - 159, n=5)
149 fps ∼82% -13%
1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (169 - 187, n=2)
178 fps ∼100% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (160 - 182, n=23)
173 fps ∼97% +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
170 (6.93min, 111P1 - 302max) fps ∼96%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (167 - 173, n=2)
170 fps ∼96% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (138 - 181, n=18)
166 fps ∼93% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (146 - 175, n=14)