Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM Laptop Review: No Extras, Just Performance

Built Ford TUF. Asus' TUF family of budget gaming laptops has been steadily growing in power for a performance level that can rival many pricier ROG models. If you don't care for fancy RGB lights or features, then the new FX506 model may be worth considering.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! English native speakers welcome!

News Writer - Details here

Unveiled just this past May alongside the 11th gen Intel Tiger Lake-H series, The 15.6-inch TUF Gaming F15 FX506 and 17.3-inch TUF Gaming F17 FX706 directly succeed last year's FX505 and FX705 models, respectively, by introducing new aesthetics and new processors. The F15 and F17 should not be confused with the faster TUF Dash series or the A15/A17 series which utilize AMD processors instead.

Our unit in review is an upper mid-range configuration with the Core i7-11800H CPU, GeForce RTX 2060 GPU, and 144 Hz display for approximately 1500 USD retail. Other SKUs are available with the Core i5-11260H, i9-11900H, RTX 3050, or 60 Hz to 240 Hz panels. All options at the moment are limited to FHD and up to the RTX 3060 to better separate the TUF model from a pricier ROG model.

Competitors in this space include other budget to midrange 15.6-inch gaming laptops like the Lenovo Legion 5i, the MSI GF/GL series, Razer Blade 15 Base Model, or the HP Pavilion 15 Gaming.

More Asus reviews:

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Processor
Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 - 4.6 GHz, 105 W PL2 / Short Burst, 80 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake H45
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU - 6144 MB, Core: 1425 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, 95 W TDP, GDDR6, 466.77, Optimus
Memory
16384 MB 
, DDR4-3200, 15-15-15-35, Dual-Channel, 2x SODIMM
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, CMN1521, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM570
Storage
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), MediaTek MT7921 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 24.9 x 359 x 256 ( = 0.98 x 14.13 x 10.08 in)
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Asus Armoury Crate, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.269 kg ( = 80.04 oz / 5 pounds), Power Supply: 546 g ( = 19.26 oz / 1.2 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86 %
06/2021
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
82 %
02/2021
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2 kg20 mm15.60"1920x1080
80 %
07/2019
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
2.2 kg26.8 mm15.60"1920x1080
86 %
03/2021
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg19.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
80 %
03/2021
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
1.9 kg21.7 mm15.60"1920x1080
83 %
07/2020
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.5 kg26.1 mm15.60"1920x1080

Case — Very Different From The FX516

The chassis is a combination of the older FX505 and newer TUF Dash F15 FX516. More specifically, it incorporates the metal-backed outer lid of the FX516 onto the base design features of the FX505. Other aspects have been updated as well including the touchpad and certain colors along the rear. The end result is a "tougher" and more visually appealing gaming laptop especially when the lid is closed.

The FX506 is still an entry-level gaming laptop, however, and this becomes obvious when opening the lid to expose the plastic base. The palm rests and keyboard deck aren't nearly as luxurious as the stronger Zephyrus or ROG laptops. To hide this fact, the plastic surfaces are embellished with all kinds of textures and superficial bumps that users will either love or hate. MSI takes the opposite approach on its competing GF65 laptops with flatter and smoother plastic surfaces instead.

A notable benefit of the textured palm rests is their ability to detract fingerprint buildup. The smoother keyboard keys and touchpad, however, aren't as lucky.

Base rigidity feels stronger than on the MSI GF65. On the other hand, the lid and its two small hinges teeter a bit more than we would like and so they don't inspire much confidence in the long term.

Dimensions are in between that of the older TUF FX505DT and faster TUF Dash F15 FX516. It's slightly heavier than either by about 100 g to 200 g each for a denser first impression. The competing Blade 15 Base Model is still the smallest of the bunch especially in length because of the thicker chin bezel of the Asus TUF design.

The TUF laptops do not support Asus' Keystone security feature
The TUF laptops do not support Asus' Keystone security feature
The outer lid is a slightly roughened matte metal surface that looks good from afar...
The outer lid is a slightly roughened matte metal surface that looks good from afar...
... while the base is simply plastic with a faux-brushed aluminum texture that's more representative of a budget gaming laptop
... while the base is simply plastic with a faux-brushed aluminum texture that's more representative of a budget gaming laptop
No dedicated auxiliary buttons for volume, microphone, or Armoury Crate unlike on the pricier ROG models
No dedicated auxiliary buttons for volume, microphone, or Armoury Crate unlike on the pricier ROG models
Maximum lid angle is limited to about ~140 degrees. The lid is susceptible to warping when twisting its front corners
Maximum lid angle is limited to about ~140 degrees. The lid is susceptible to warping when twisting its front corners
Honeycomb grille design on bottom panel much like on the Alienware and MSI GS laptops
Honeycomb grille design on bottom panel much like on the Alienware and MSI GS laptops
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
363.1 mm / 14.3 inch 259.6 mm / 10.2 inch 26.1 mm / 1.028 inch 2.5 kg5.42 lbs360.4 mm / 14.2 inch 262 mm / 10.3 inch 26.8 mm / 1.055 inch 2.2 kg4.92 lbs359 mm / 14.1 inch 256 mm / 10.1 inch 24.9 mm / 0.98 inch 2.3 kg5 lbs359 mm / 14.1 inch 254 mm / 10 inch 21.7 mm / 0.854 inch 1.9 kg4.27 lbs360 mm / 14.2 inch 252 mm / 9.92 inch 20 mm / 0.787 inch 2 kg4.51 lbs355 mm / 14 inch 235 mm / 9.25 inch 19.9 mm / 0.783 inch 2.1 kg4.61 lbs

Connectivity — Thunderbolt 4 Comes Standard

Port options are the same as on the TUF Dash F15 but rearranged and with some notable upgrades. The right edge, for example, now houses just one USB port instead of two. Meanwhile, the USB-C port along the left edge now fully supports Thunderbolt 4 whereas earlier TUF laptops with AMD or 10th gen Intel CPUs or older would not.

Front: No ports
Front: No ports
USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1, Kensington Lock
USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1, Kensington Lock
Rear: No ports
Rear: No ports
Left: AC adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, HDMI 2.0b, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1, USB-C w/ Thunderbolt 4 and DisplayPort (No laptop charging), 3.5 mm combo audio
Left: AC adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, HDMI 2.0b, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1, USB-C w/ Thunderbolt 4 and DisplayPort (No laptop charging), 3.5 mm combo audio

Communication

Wi-FI 6 and Bluetooth 5.1 are provided by a MediaTek MT7921 which competes directly with the common Intel AX200/201. Though transfer rates are steady, they don't quite reach the same >1 Gbps maximums that we see on other laptops with the Intel wireless model.

M.2 WLAN module sits underneath the primary M.2 2280 SSD slot
M.2 WLAN module sits underneath the primary M.2 2280 SSD slot
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1603 (1249min - 1664max) MBit/s ∼100% +104%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1149 (933min - 1432max) MBit/s ∼72% +46%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
973 MBit/s ∼61% +24%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
MediaTek MT7921
787 (675min - 851max) MBit/s ∼49%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
617 MBit/s ∼38% -22%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
566 (37min - 647max) MBit/s ∼35% -28%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1520 (1485min - 1556max) MBit/s ∼100% +73%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1330 (1014min - 1439max) MBit/s ∼88% +51%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1330 MBit/s ∼88% +51%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
880 (772min - 916max) MBit/s ∼58% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
MediaTek MT7921
878 (827min - 896max) MBit/s ∼58%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
586 MBit/s ∼39% -33%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850896886884879881875879893880882887886889872892888872889888883887875879879854846872860865827896886884879881875879893880882887886889872892888872889888883887875879879854846872860865827818803785782757851748819794803823815809773760764797845792803786762809791748803737675771790Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø878 (827-896)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø787 (675-851)

Webcam

Standard 720p webcam with no IR or privacy shutter
Standard 720p webcam with no IR or privacy shutter
ColorChecker
12.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
19 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
22 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
13 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
22 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
13 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM: 14.68 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.34 ∆E

Maintenance — Easy Upgradeability

The bottom panel pops off fairly easily after removing its 11 Philips screws. The internal layout shares many similarities with the TUF Dash F15 despite their significant chassis differences.

Users can easily upgrade both RAM and storage if desired
Users can easily upgrade both RAM and storage if desired

Accessories and Warranty

The retail box includes a page of Asus stickers alongside the usual paperwork. A one-year limited warranty comes standard.

Input Devices — Great Typing Experience

Keyboard

While keyboard layout has changed from the FX505, the typing experience remains mostly the same. Feedback from the main QWERTY keys is still satisfactory with moderately loud clatter. Our main issue continues to be with the arrow keys which are now even smaller than the ones on the last generation model. Not only are they cramped, but feedback is spongy and unsatisfying. You're going to want an external keyboard or another gaming laptop if you plan on using the arrow keys frequently.

Single-zone RGB lighting is available with no per-key options. Users will have to upgrade to the pricier Asus ROG series for such luxury features.

Touchpad

The touchpad is relatively small (~10.6 x 8.0 cm), but it's one of the few gaming laptops with dedicated mouse buttons for more accurate control and clicks. The buttons are very quiet when pressed with moderate but satisfactory feedback in contrast to the much louder buttons on the MSI GT series. The texture-less touchpad surface is unfortunately susceptible to unsightly fingerprint buildup, however.

Keyboard layout has changed from the older FX505 series
Keyboard layout has changed from the older FX505 series
Touchpad surface is stickier than on most other laptops
Touchpad surface is stickier than on most other laptops
Key feedback remains largely the same as on the TUF Dash or FX505
Key feedback remains largely the same as on the TUF Dash or FX505
Directional keys are now even smaller than before
Directional keys are now even smaller than before

Display — High On Refresh Rate, Low On Colors

The 144 Hz Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1 IPS panel here can also be found on the recent Nitro 5 AN515-55 which is a competing budget gaming laptop from Acer. Aside from the fast native refresh rate, everything else about the panel is fairly mediocre to reflect the entry-level category. Response times, colors, and contrast aren't nearly as good as the panels on Asus' more expensive Zephyrus or ROG models. Nonetheless, the ultra-smooth motion is a noticeable upgrade over the cheaper 60 Hz panels out there.

Thick bottom bezel remains
Thick bottom bezel remains
Narrow side bezels
Narrow side bezels
Matte subpixel array is slightly grainier than a full-on glossy alternative
Matte subpixel array is slightly grainier than a full-on glossy alternative
Minor-moderate uneven backlight bleeding near the bottom right corner of our unit
Minor-moderate uneven backlight bleeding near the bottom right corner of our unit
276.1
cd/m²
257.7
cd/m²
232.6
cd/m²
277.5
cd/m²
268.3
cd/m²
235.2
cd/m²
263.3
cd/m²
265.6
cd/m²
234.6
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 277.5 cd/m² Average: 256.8 cd/m² Minimum: 15.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 268.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 789:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.05 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 3.21
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
43.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
LQ156M1JW26 (SHP1532), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Panda LM156LF-GL, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
AU Optronics B156HAN08.4, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
BOE CQ NV156FHM-NX1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Display
58%
-6%
50%
-10%
-7%
Display P3 Coverage
41.9
66.93
60%
39.56
-6%
64.3
53%
37.65
-10%
38.8
-7%
sRGB Coverage
62.9
98.12
56%
59.46
-5%
91.79
46%
56.27
-11%
57.76
-8%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
43.3
67.93
57%
40.91
-6%
65.53
51%
38.9
-10%
40.09
-7%
Response Times
56%
-18%
62%
-38%
15%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
28.4 (15.6, 12.8)
12 (6.8, 5.2)
58%
30.4 (14, 16.4)
-7%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
69%
36.8 (19.2, 17.6)
-30%
26 (12, 14)
8%
Response Time Black / White *
21.6 (11.6, 10)
10 (5.6, 4.4)
54%
27.6 (17.6, 10)
-28%
10 (5.6, 4.4)
54%
31.6 (18.4, 13.2)
-46%
17 (8, 9)
21%
PWM Frequency
23580 (30)
1000 (99)
Screen
35%
-4%
21%
11%
12%
Brightness middle
268.3
286
7%
286.2
7%
317.2
18%
266.5
-1%
301
12%
Brightness
257
275
7%
267
4%
306
19%
262
2%
277
8%
Brightness Distribution
84
91
8%
84
0%
89
6%
91
8%
77
-8%
Black Level *
0.34
0.25
26%
0.33
3%
0.31
9%
0.18
47%
0.26
24%
Contrast
789
1144
45%
867
10%
1023
30%
1481
88%
1158
47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.05
2.43
52%
5.45
-8%
4.37
13%
5.33
-6%
5.12
-1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
15.43
6.33
59%
18.08
-17%
6.62
57%
18.28
-18%
8.86
43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.21
0.83
74%
4.47
-39%
2.67
17%
4.36
-36%
4.88
-52%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.5
3.5
36%
5.3
4%
4.5
18%
4.5
18%
3.47
37%
Gamma
2.35 94%
2.32 95%
2.1 105%
2.4 92%
2.35 94%
2.37 93%
CCT
7392 88%
7145 91%
7679 85%
7418 88%
6289 103%
7062 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
68
37.6
59.2
35.6
37
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
59.1
91.4
55.8
57
Total Average (Program / Settings)
50% / 43%
-9% / -6%
44% / 33%
-12% / -0%
7% / 8%

* ... smaller is better

Color space is narrow at just 63 percent of sRGB to be indicative of a budget panel despite the 144 Hz native refresh rate. Most inexpensive gaming laptops like the Asus TUF tend to sacrifice color accuracy for faster response times and refresh rates. Uou may want to connect a more color accurate external monitor if you're a professional graphics editor.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

X-Rite colorimeter measurements show a display in need of calibration as the TUF series laptops are not pre-calibrated at factory. Color temperature in particular is too cool while blue is represented much more inaccurately than other colors. After calibrating the panel ourselves, grayscale and RGB balance would improve dramatically form an average DeltaE of 5.5 to just 1.0. However, colors are still relatively inaccurate at higher saturation levels due to the limited color space mentioned above.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.6 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.6 ms rise
↘ 12.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15377 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Outdoor visibility isn't better or worse than the last generation model or most other gaming laptops for that matter since the backlight is relatively dim. Colors look washed out and glare is noticeable despite the matte overlay. This isn't a system you'll want to be using outdoors on a frequent basis.

We recommend turning off Intel Display Power Saver mode or else maximum brightness may be even dimmer when running on battery power.

Outdoors on an overcast day
Outdoors on an overcast day
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors on an overcast day
Outdoors on an overcast day
IPS viewing angles
IPS viewing angles

Performance — 11th Gen Core i7 Tiger Lake-H Debut

Asus offers a long list of 11th gen processor and Ampere graphics options for the TUF Gaming F15 including the Core i5-11260H, i5-11400H, i7-11800H, and the i9-11900H with either the GeForce RTX 3050 (60 W + 15 W DB) or RTX 3060 (90 W + 5 W DB) GPU. These options replace last year's 10th gen Comet Lake-H CPUs and GTX 1650 to 1660 Ti options. Resizable Bar, Dynamic Boost 2.0, and Whisper Mode 2.0, and standard Optimus 1.0 are all supported. AMD options are not yet available on this series.

Our unit was set to Turbo mode via Asus Armoury Crate prior to running any performance benchmarks below for the highest possible scores. Owners should absolutely become familiar with the software as it serves as a command center for Asus-specific settings and features.

Processor

CPU performance is excellent and comparable to the competing Ryzen 9 5900HX or Ryzen 9 5980HS in both single-thread and multi-threaded workloads. The gen-to-gen performance uptick from last year's Core i7-10875H is sizeable at roughly 25 to 35 percent. If you have the option between an older Core i9-10980HK or newer Core i7-11800H, then the latter is looking to be the better and faster choice.

0120240360480600720840960108012001320144015601680180019202040216022802095.122011.162009.651997.12025.521980.11977.072020.711989.361994.221987.782022.352011.261993.922003.411990.842000.31987.782004.912004.911997.11978.531997.11978.531986.291980.11963.381993.921997.12000.31998.71983.141998.72008.032015.931978.921987.782017.551964.931964.932001.72019.182004.911974.041998.71980.22012.781995.512000.31981.671208.081121.611121.421119.951112.51112.751120.351123.1211311123.311075.821047.891072.161077.061081.21075.731077.211080.941077.181075.881074.781077.061075.471079.861079.911082.511081.261083.011082.461079.131081.111081.611078.571081.021078.951083.541081.671079.741078.661078.341660.161533.331501.951508.471508.921512.741517.81519.011522.011511.771445.771427.861456.451445.871451.271460.441436.521446.921445.031408.41461.8314591454.021451.221458.581456.611453.651455.921448.491439.061457.671458.681432.561443.571447.181459.481451.591463.751463.431452.061639.551663.621631.591635.591634.721648.131625.951610.241611.021615.71615.71645.081608.171632.591613.421629.461632.251614.991603.721608.821639.081614.141643.051637.331623.642361.092271.442229.162038.012024.392043.322036.042039.572014.32055.922031.282051.912041.862036.562023.982044.782028.192026.342036.972041.132047.922024.392032.622033.552024.72022.552033.862058.042048.242049.812050.762021.022041.342056.032041.752017.352041.232063.342053.492051.72095.122011.162009.651997.12025.521980.11977.072020.711989.361994.221987.782022.352011.261993.922003.411990.842000.31987.782004.912004.911997.11978.531997.11978.531986.291980.11963.381993.921997.12000.31998.71983.141998.72008.032015.931978.921987.782017.551964.931964.932001.72019.182004.911974.041998.71980.22012.781995.512000.31981.671208.081121.611121.421119.951112.51112.751120.351123.1211311123.311075.821047.891072.161077.061081.21075.731077.211080.941077.181075.881074.781077.061075.471079.861079.911082.511081.261083.011082.461079.131081.111081.611078.571081.021078.951083.541081.671079.741078.661078.341660.161533.331501.951508.471508.921512.741517.81519.011522.011511.771445.771427.861456.451445.871451.271460.441436.521446.921445.031408.41461.8314591454.021451.221458.581456.611453.651455.921448.491439.061457.671458.681432.561443.571447.181459.481451.591463.751463.431452.061639.551663.621631.591635.591634.721648.131625.951610.241611.021615.71615.71645.081608.171632.591613.421629.461632.251614.991603.721608.821639.081614.141643.051637.331623.642361.092271.442229.162038.012024.392043.322036.042039.572014.32055.922031.282051.912041.862036.562023.982044.782028.192026.342036.972041.132047.922024.392032.622033.552024.72022.552033.862058.042048.242049.812050.762021.022041.342056.032041.752017.352041.232063.342053.492051.72095.122011.162009.651997.12025.521980.11977.072020.711989.361994.221987.782022.352011.261993.922003.411990.842000.31987.782004.912004.911997.11978.531997.11978.531986.291980.11963.381993.921997.12000.31998.71983.141998.72008.032015.931978.921987.782017.551964.931964.932001.72019.182004.911974.041998.71980.22012.781995.512000.31981.671208.081121.611121.421119.951112.51112.751120.351123.1211311123.311075.821047.891072.161077.061081.21075.731077.211080.941077.181075.881074.781077.061075.471079.861079.911082.511081.261083.011082.461079.131081.111081.611078.571081.021078.951083.541081.671079.741078.661078.341660.161533.331501.951508.471508.921512.741517.81519.011522.011511.771445.771427.861456.451445.871451.271460.441436.521446.921445.031408.41461.8314591454.021451.221458.581456.611453.651455.921448.491439.061457.671458.681432.561443.571447.181459.481451.591463.751463.431452.061639.551663.621631.591635.591634.721648.131625.951610.241611.021615.71615.71645.081608.171632.591613.421629.461632.251614.991603.721608.821639.081614.141643.051637.331623.642361.092271.442229.162038.012024.392043.322036.042039.572014.32055.922031.282051.912041.862036.562023.982044.782028.192026.342036.972041.132047.922024.392032.622033.552024.72022.552033.862058.042048.242049.812050.762021.022041.342056.032041.752017.352041.232063.342053.492051.7Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM Intel Core i7-11800H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1997 (1963.38-2095.12)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 Intel Core i7-10875H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1091 (1047.89-1208.08)
Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE Intel Core i7-10875H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1470 (1408.4-1660.16)
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1627 (1603.72-1663.62)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø2057 (2014.3-2361.09)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
5182 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5045 Points ∼97% -3%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
4953 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (3306 - 5408, n=17)
4582 Points ∼88% -12%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4369 Points ∼84% -16%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4288 Points ∼83% -17%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
3907 Points ∼75% -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3871 Points ∼75% -25%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
3721 Points ∼72% -28%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3224 Points ∼62% -38%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
2199 Points ∼42% -58%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
2155 Points ∼42% -58%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
604 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points ∼96%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
577 Points ∼96% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (520 - 584, n=14)
574 Points ∼95% -1%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
519 Points ∼86% -11%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
495 Points ∼82% -15%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
491 Points ∼81% -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
490 Points ∼81% -16%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
473 Points ∼78% -19%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
467 Points ∼77% -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
457 Points ∼76% -21%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
428 Points ∼71% -26%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
13445 (12565.7min - 13444.6max) Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
13066 Points ∼97% -3%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
12629 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (8447 - 14088, n=15)
11810 Points ∼88% -12%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
10263 Points ∼76% -24%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
5786 Points ∼43% -57%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
1529 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
1509 Points ∼99%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
1507 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1399 - 1520, n=13)
1499 Points ∼98% -1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1478 Points ∼97% -2%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1224 Points ∼80% -19%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2151 (1969.09min - 2151.12max) Points ∼100% +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
2095 (1963.38min - 2095.12max) Points ∼97%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
2083 Points ∼97% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1342 - 2173, n=16)
1930 Points ∼90% -8%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1884 Points ∼88% -10%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
1863 Points ∼87% -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1733 (1604.75min - 1733.1max) Points ∼81% -17%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1728 Points ∼80% -18%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
1664 (1603.72min - 1663.62max) Points ∼77% -21%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1398 (1313.46min - 1397.77max) Points ∼65% -33%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
1086 (631.76min - 1047.34max) Points ∼50% -48%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
902 Points ∼42% -57%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
243 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
238 Points ∼98% +4%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
231 Points ∼95% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (204 - 230, n=13)
226 Points ∼93% -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
211 Points ∼87% -8%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
200 Points ∼82% -13%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
193 Points ∼79% -16%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
192 Points ∼79% -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
189 Points ∼78% -17%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
187 Points ∼77% -18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
178 Points ∼73% -22%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
492 Seconds * ∼100% -109%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
467 Seconds * ∼95% -99%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
345 Seconds * ∼70% -47%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
297 Seconds * ∼60% -26%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
292 Seconds * ∼59% -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
279 Seconds * ∼57% -19%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (217 - 342, n=13)
274 Seconds * ∼56% -17%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
261 Seconds * ∼53% -11%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
257.8 Seconds * ∼52% -10%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
245.6 Seconds * ∼50% -5%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
245 Seconds * ∼50% -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
235 Seconds * ∼48%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
5659 MIPS ∼100%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
5623 MIPS ∼99% -1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5568 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5525 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (5392 - 5716, n=13)
5525 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
5244 MIPS ∼93% -7%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
5128 MIPS ∼91% -9%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
5114 MIPS ∼90% -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
4903 MIPS ∼87% -13%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4725 MIPS ∼83% -17%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4634 MIPS ∼82% -18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4471 MIPS ∼79% -21%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
57319 MIPS ∼100% +12%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
55335 MIPS ∼97% +8%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
52152 MIPS ∼91% +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
51046 MIPS ∼89%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38156 - 56758, n=13)
48812 MIPS ∼85% -4%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
48577 MIPS ∼85% -5%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
47941 MIPS ∼84% -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
47806 MIPS ∼83% -6%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
46431 MIPS ∼81% -9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
36693 MIPS ∼64% -28%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
26791 MIPS ∼47% -48%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
24322 MIPS ∼42% -52%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
1537 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1487 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (882 - 1625, n=11)
1384 Points ∼90%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
1376 Points ∼90%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1368 Points ∼89%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1285 Points ∼84%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
1242 Points ∼81%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
1218 Points ∼79%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
1205 Points ∼78%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1196 Points ∼78%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1108 Points ∼72%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
8620 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8586 Points ∼100%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
7984 Points ∼93%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
7758 Points ∼90%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
7675 Points ∼89%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
7583 Points ∼88%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
7518 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (3323 - 9851, n=11)
7268 Points ∼84%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
5260 Points ∼61%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
4733 Points ∼55%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
4358 Points ∼51%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
15.6 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
15.2 fps ∼97% -3%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
14.4 fps ∼92% -8%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (11 - 17.4, n=13)
14 fps ∼90% -10%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
13.5 fps ∼87% -13%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
13.3 fps ∼85% -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
13 fps ∼83% -17%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
12.9 fps ∼83% -17%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
12.193 fps ∼78% -22%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
9.27 fps ∼59% -41%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
8.16 fps ∼52% -48%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
7.28 fps ∼47% -53%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
71.9 s * ∼100% -62%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
67.98 s * ∼95% -53%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
64.1 s * ∼89% -44%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
56.5 s * ∼79% -27%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
53.3 s * ∼74% -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
51.25 s * ∼71% -15%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
50.3 s * ∼70% -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
48.4 s * ∼67% -9%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
47.1 s * ∼66% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38.6 - 49.5, n=13)
45.4 s * ∼63% -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
44.5 s * ∼62%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.639 sec * ∼100% -15%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
0.626 sec * ∼98% -13%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.597 sec * ∼93% -7%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.586 sec * ∼92% -5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.569 sec * ∼89% -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.565 sec * ∼88% -2%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.562 sec * ∼88% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (0.548 - 0.587, n=13)
0.561 sec * ∼88% -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.556 sec * ∼87%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.512 sec * ∼80% +8%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
0.504 sec * ∼79% +9%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2095 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
188 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
229 Points
Help

System Performance

PCMark 10 scores are consistently higher than on last year's FX505 and also other laptops with 10th gen Core CPUs and the same RTX 3060 GPU. In fact, they're some of the highest in our database between all laptops with this particular GPU.

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6865 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6378 Points ∼93% -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (5117 - 6901, n=16)
6360 Points ∼93% -7%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6088 Points ∼89% -11%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5390 Points ∼79% -21%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
4887 Points ∼71% -29%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4732 Points ∼69% -31%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10522 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
10144 Points ∼96% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (8945 - 10602, n=16)
9871 Points ∼94% -6%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9378 Points ∼89% -11%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9093 Points ∼86% -14%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
9008 Points ∼86% -14%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8355 Points ∼79% -21%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9298 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
8859 Points ∼95%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6732 - 9728, n=16)
8510 Points ∼92% -4%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8281 Points ∼89% -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
8058 Points ∼87% -9%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7729 Points ∼83% -13%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
6518 Points ∼70% -26%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9423 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8381 Points ∼89% -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6003 - 9497, n=16)
8340 Points ∼89% -11%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
7023 Points ∼75% -25%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6047 Points ∼64% -36%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5282 Points ∼56% -44%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
4366 Points ∼46% -54%
PCMark 10 Score
6865 points
Help

DPC Latency

LatencyMon shows DPC latency issues when opening multiple tabs on our homepage. 4K video playback at 60 FPS is otherwise smooth and without any dropped frames. CPU and iGPU utilization would be very low at just 5 percent and 24 percent, respectively.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1431.2 μs * ∼100%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1122 μs * ∼78% +22%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
788.37 μs * ∼55% +45%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
723.4 μs * ∼51% +49%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
638.4 μs * ∼45% +55%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices — Now With PCIe 4.0

Our test unit comes with the same 1 TB SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N NVMe SSD as found on the TUF Dash F15. This doesn't guarantee that users will also get the same drive, however, as Asus sources drives from multiple providers including Intel and Samsung. Transfer rates are excellent on our drive with performance levels similar to the 1 TB Samsung PM981.

Asus also offers PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD options for those who want to take advantage of the faster bandwidth that was previously unavailable on older Intel 10th gen laptops.

Primary M.2 2280 PCIe 4 slot
Primary M.2 2280 PCIe 4 slot
Secondary M.2 2280 PCIe 3 slot if users want to add another SSD
Secondary M.2 2280 PCIe 3 slot if users want to add another SSD
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
AS SSD
-25%
-43%
10%
-39%
Seq Read
2872.59
2671.27
-7%
1019.04
-65%
3001.79
4%
2011.91
-30%
Seq Write
1619.38
1501.32
-7%
888.5
-45%
2420.33
49%
1261.05
-22%
4K Read
57.51
39.65
-31%
48.22
-16%
48.46
-16%
43.66
-24%
4K Write
149.57
68.99
-54%
115.48
-23%
114.31
-24%
109.31
-27%
4K-64 Read
1251.93
1209.4
-3%
321.49
-74%
1872.64
50%
850.81
-32%
4K-64 Write
2196.29
1649.93
-25%
787.44
-64%
1881.76
-14%
780.22
-64%
Access Time Read *
0.04
0.093
-133%
0.065
-63%
0.045
-13%
0.117
-193%
Access Time Write *
0.082
0.055
33%
0.047
43%
0.101
-23%
0.036
56%
Score Read
1597
1516
-5%
472
-70%
2221
39%
1096
-31%
Score Write
2508
1869
-25%
992
-60%
2238
-11%
1016
-59%
Score Total
4869
4105
-16%
1717
-65%
5565
14%
2643
-46%
Copy ISO MB/s
1582.99
942.16
-40%
2420.79
53%
1481.3
-6%
Copy Program MB/s
963.8
444.49
-54%
705.47
-27%
467.48
-51%
Copy Game MB/s
943.07
866.7
-8%
1489.63
58%
733.71
-22%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-17%
-38%
-6%
-26%
Write 4K
168.1
129.6
-23%
137.5
-18%
157.3
-6%
145.4
-14%
Read 4K
65.09
44.71
-31%
56.96
-12%
46.69
-28%
51.6
-21%
Write Seq
2124
1929
-9%
983.8
-54%
2389
12%
1007
-53%
Read Seq
2204
2035
-8%
1564
-29%
2196
0%
1145
-48%
Write 4K Q32T1
455.3
425.9
-6%
237.4
-48%
407.6
-10%
468.4
3%
Read 4K Q32T1
465.6
433.4
-7%
340.7
-27%
518.5
11%
528.1
13%
Write Seq Q32T1
2911
1390
-52%
958.8
-67%
2401
-18%
1381
-53%
Read Seq Q32T1
3519
3505
0%
1732
-51%
3344
-5%
2291
-35%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-21% / -22%
-41% / -41%
2% / 4%
-33% / -35%

* ... smaller is better

SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3519 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2911 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 465.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 455.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2204 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2124 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 65.09 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 168.1 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0180360540720900108012601440162018001980216023402520270028803060324034203330.123511.683520.283520.283520.913521.123521.753522.593522.593522.593522.593524.263524.893525.733525.733526.153527.23527.23527.413527.833527.833528.043528.253528.673528.673528.883528.883529.723530.143530.773530.973531.183531.183531.813532.443532.443533.73533.913534.123534.123534.123534.333534.333534.333535.83536.223538.113540.23541.883542.93Tooltip
: Ø3525 (3330.12-3542.93)

GPU Performance — 90 W TGP GeForce RTX 3060 Graphics

Graphics performance is exactly where we expect it to be relative to other laptops with the same mobile GeForce RTX 3060 GPU. Downgrading to the GTX 1660 Ti or GTX 1650 will net gamers a 20 percent and 50 percent drop in performance, respectively.

Performance in games is excellent with results that are nearly identical to the average RTX 2070 gaming laptop or RTX 2060 desktop.

There is a slight performance gap between Performance mode and Turbo mode. Running Fire Strike on Turbo mode returns higher Physics and Graphics scores of about 2 percent and 5 percent, respectively, at the cost of louder fan noise.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Time Spy
Time Spy
Fire Strike (Turbo mode)
Fire Strike (Turbo mode)
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike (Performance mode)
Fire Strike (Performance mode)
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK
31133 Points ∼100% +47%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, R9 5950X
28145 Points ∼90% +33%
Alienware m15 R4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK
27977 Points ∼90% +33%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
25497 Points ∼82% +21%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
21111 Points ∼68%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (16956 - 22460, n=19)
19998 Points ∼64% -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
16488 Points ∼53% -22%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
15499 Points ∼50% -27%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R05E
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 5600H
9792 Points ∼31% -54%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK
11915 Points ∼100% +55%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, R9 5950X
11590 Points ∼97% +51%
Alienware m15 R4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK
11019 Points ∼92% +44%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
9854 Points ∼83% +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6475 - 8844, n=19)
7800 Points ∼65% +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
7677 Points ∼64%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
6123 Points ∼51% -20%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
5819 Points ∼49% -24%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R05E
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 5600H
3613 Points ∼30% -53%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK
11542 Points ∼100% +47%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, R9 5950X
11520 Points ∼100% +47%
Alienware m15 R4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK
10872 Points ∼94% +39%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
10012 Points ∼87% +28%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
7848 Points ∼68%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6529 - 8863, n=19)
7816 Points ∼68% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
6261 Points ∼54% -20%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
6161 Points ∼53% -21%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45-R05E
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 5600H
3887 Points ∼34% -50%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, R9 5950X
6809 Points ∼100% +42%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
5799 Points ∼85% +21%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
4795 Points ∼70%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (3724 - 5280, n=12)
4622 Points ∼68% -4%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
3286 Points ∼48% -31%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK
40754 Points ∼100% +46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, R9 5950X
37941 Points ∼93% +36%
Alienware m15 R4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK
37287 Points ∼91% +34%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
34846 Points ∼86% +25%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
27898 Points ∼68%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (22063 - 30200, n=17)
26067 Points ∼64% -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
22670 Points ∼56% -19%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
20535 Points ∼50% -26%
1280x720 Performance Combined
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, R9 5950X
22460 Points ∼100% +42%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
18934 Points ∼84% +20%
Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK
16298 Points ∼73% +3%
Alienware m15 R4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK
15877 Points ∼71% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
15770 Points ∼70%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (10227 - 17479, n=16)
14548 Points ∼65% -8%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
13993 Points ∼62% -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
13061 Points ∼58% -17%
3DMark 11 Performance
23461 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
49836 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
19131 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
7848 points
Help
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 199, n=19)
178 fps ∼100% +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (151 - 158, n=2)
155 fps ∼87% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
153 fps ∼86%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (137 - 175, n=16)
152 fps ∼85% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
 
152 fps ∼85% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (124 - 161, n=14)
144 fps ∼81% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (121 - 137, n=4)
130 fps ∼73% -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (98.4 - 144, n=4)
118 fps ∼66% -23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (54.8 - 82.3, n=3)
68 fps ∼38% -56%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (113 - 154, n=20)
136 fps ∼100% +31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (67 - 142, n=17)
109 fps ∼80% +5%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
104 fps ∼76%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (100 - 106, n=3)
103 fps ∼76% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (88.4 - 112, n=14)
99.7 fps ∼73% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
 
99.6 fps ∼73% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (74 - 89.2, n=5)
82.3 fps ∼61% -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (78.1 - 87.6, n=5)
81.5 fps ∼60% -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (47.7 - 51.2, n=4)
49.6 fps ∼36% -52%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (85.4 - 115, n=23)
103 fps ∼100% +32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (62 - 103, n=22)
84.7 fps ∼82% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (77 - 80.6, n=3)
78.6 fps ∼76% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
78.1 fps ∼76%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (67.4 - 87.2, n=15)
76.4 fps ∼74% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
 
72.6 fps ∼70% -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (52 - 67.5, n=7)
61.8 fps ∼60% -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (55.4 - 63.9, n=5)
59 fps ∼57% -24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (33.6 - 37.2, n=4)
35.5 fps ∼34% -55%
GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
180 (3.76min, 143P1 - 276max) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (164 - 186, n=22)
180 fps ∼100% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (164 - 184, n=17)
177 fps ∼98% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (164 - 182, n=17)
176 fps ∼98% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
 
174 fps ∼97% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (163 - 179, n=3)
173 fps ∼96% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (153 - 178, n=4)
171 fps ∼95% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (153 - 168, n=5)
160 fps ∼89% -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (99.1 - 178, n=5)
132 fps ∼73% -27%
1920x1080 Lowest Settings possible
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (173 - 186, n=21)
180 fps ∼100% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (174 - 179, n=2)
177 fps ∼98% +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (150 - 182, n=16)
173 fps ∼96% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (168 - 175, n=4)
173 fps ∼96% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (156 - 180, n=14)
171 fps ∼95% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
170 (5.85min, 111P1 - 458max) fps ∼94%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (124 - 163, n=3)
148 fps ∼82% -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (95.3 - 175, n=3)
145 fps ∼81% -15%
1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (167 - 181, n=18)
176 fps ∼100% +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
172 (3.5min, 125P1 - 371max) fps ∼98%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (152 - 178, n=14)
170 fps ∼97% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (153 - 179, n=13)
169 fps ∼96% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
 
166 fps ∼94% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (156 - 172, n=3)
166 fps ∼94% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (143 - 171, n=5)
163 fps ∼93% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (133 - 159, n=5)
149 fps ∼85% -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (91.6 - 170, n=5)
122 fps ∼69% -29%
1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (160 - 180, n=22)
173 fps ∼100% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (167 - 173, n=2)
170 fps ∼98% +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (138 - 177, n=17)
166 fps ∼96% +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (146 - 175, n=14)
165 fps ∼95% +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (159 - 169, n=4)
165 fps ∼95% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
164 (4.13min, 100P1 - 330max) fps ∼95%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (113 - 155, n=3)
138 fps ∼80% -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (87.8 - 167, n=3)
138 fps ∼80% -16%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (137 - 176, n=23)
161 fps ∼100% +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
 
148 fps ∼92% +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (111 - 166, n=17)
147 fps ∼91% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
146 (4.29min, 90.9P1 - 310max) fps ∼91%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (120 - 160, n=17)
146 fps ∼91% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (127 - 160, n=3)
145 fps ∼90% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (124 - 140, n=5)
135 fps ∼84% -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (94.5 - 127, n=5)
114 fps ∼71% -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (67.7 - 102, n=5)
79.5 fps ∼49% -46%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
 
101 fps ∼100% +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (84 - 112, n=24)
97.3 fps ∼96% +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (72.6 - 97, n=21)