MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Laptop Review: GeForce RTX 3060 on a Budget

The MSI GF65 is one of the least expensive 15.6-inch gaming laptop laptops you can buy with GeForce RTX 3060 graphics. Our review configuration comes with the 10th gen Core i7-10750H, aforementioned RTX 30 GPU, 32 GB of RAM, and 1 TB Samsung SSD for about $1650 USD from CUKUSA. However, lesser RAM, storage and Core i5 options are available for much lower prices starting at $999.
Externally, the GF65 10UE carries the same chassis design as the 2020 GF65 9SD and so many of our existing comments still apply. We recommend checking out our review on the 2020 version to learn more about the physical features of the laptop.
The MSI GF series competes with other budget gaming laptops like the Lenovo Legion 5, Dell G5, Acer Nitro 5, or the Asus TUF series.
More MSI reviews:
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- Specialist News Writer
- Magazine Writer
- Translator (DE<->EN)
Details here
Join our Support Satisfaction Survey 2023: We want to hear about your experiences!
Participate here
potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.4 % | 03/2021 | MSI GF65 Thin 10UE i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 21.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85 % | 02/2021 | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 27.2 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.9 % | 03/2021 | Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 22.9 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
84 % | 02/2021 | MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 19.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.4 % | 02/2021 | Aorus 15G XC i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 23 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % | 12/2020 | Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.4 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Case
Surfaces feel thin and they warp more readily when compared to MSI's higher-end models from the GE or GT series. The GF65 doesn't feel as luxurious as a result which is to be expected from an entry-level gaming laptop. The competing Asus TUF models, which are slightly heavier, feel sturdier.
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
Connectivity
Port options remain identical except for one notable change: the HDMI 1.4 port on last year's GF65 9SD has been updated to HDMI 2.0 for full 4K60 FPS external monitor support. The USB-C ports continue to be incompatible with external monitors, however.
Communication
Webcam

Maintenance
Accessories and Warranty
There are no extras in the box beyond the usual AC adapter and paperwork. The standard one-year limited warranty applies while any components installed by CUKUSA, like RAM or storage, will have three-year coverage instead.
Input Devices
Display
The GF65 10UE uses a different AU Optronics panel from the older GF65 9SD (AUO B156HAN08.4 vs. AUO B156HAN13.0) with the main difference between them being refresh rate (144 Hz vs. 120 Hz). Other than that, the panels are almost identical including their average black-white response times and below-average gamut. Contrast is quite high at over 1000:1, but the limited color reproduction diminishes this advantage.
Subjectively, the display is buttery smooth for gaming and general usage — just be prepared for a little ghosting and don't expect colors to pop.
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 266.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 1481:1 (Black: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.33 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 4.36
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
55.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE AU Optronics B156HAN08.4, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR LQ156M1JW25, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 15.60, 2560x1440 | MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Aorus 15G XC Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE AUO048E, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 74% | 81% | 78% | 73% | 82% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 37.65 | 67.7 80% | 69.8 85% | 67.7 80% | 65.6 74% | 70.3 87% |
sRGB Coverage | 56.3 | 94.3 67% | 98.8 75% | 98.4 75% | 97.5 73% | 99.4 77% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 38.9 | 68.2 75% | 70.7 82% | 69.1 78% | 67.1 72% | 71.3 83% |
Response Times | 75% | 64% | 62% | 72% | 77% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36.8 ? | 8.2 ? 78% | 14.8 ? 60% | 14.4 ? 61% | 9.6 ? 74% | 8 ? 78% |
Response Time Black / White * | 31.6 ? | 9.2 ? 71% | 10.4 ? 67% | 11.6 ? 63% | 9.6 ? 70% | 8 ? 75% |
PWM Frequency | 24040 ? | |||||
Screen | 27% | 40% | 29% | 37% | 47% | |
Brightness middle | 266.5 | 308 16% | 347 30% | 259.5 -3% | 288 8% | 470 76% |
Brightness | 262 | 288 10% | 328 25% | 264 1% | 270 3% | 468 79% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 86 -5% | 89 -2% | 90 -1% | 89 -2% | 85 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.18 | 0.23 -28% | 0.27 -50% | 0.25 -39% | 0.25 -39% | 0.21 -17% |
Contrast | 1481 | 1339 -10% | 1285 -13% | 1038 -30% | 1152 -22% | 2238 51% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.33 | 3.28 38% | 1.66 69% | 2.52 53% | 1.19 78% | 3.28 38% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.28 | 8.51 53% | 3.03 83% | 5.55 70% | 3.79 79% | 7.31 60% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.36 | 0.83 81% | 1.23 72% | 1.93 56% | 0.71 84% | 0.8 82% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 5 -11% | 1.6 64% | 1.7 62% | 1.6 64% | 4.49 -0% |
Gamma | 2.35 94% | 2.057 107% | 2.278 97% | 2.04 108% | 2.229 99% | 2.4 92% |
CCT | 6289 103% | 7393 88% | 6430 101% | 6414 101% | 6539 99% | 7438 87% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 35.6 | 68 91% | 71 99% | 63.3 78% | 67 88% | 65 83% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 55.8 | 90 61% | 94 68% | 98.8 77% | 90 61% | 99 77% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 59% /
42% | 62% /
51% | 56% /
43% | 61% /
48% | 69% /
58% |
* ... smaller is better
Color space covers just 56 percent and 36 percent of sRGB and AdobeRGB, respectively, to be indicative of a budget panel despite the high 144 Hz native refresh rate. Most mid-range or better Ultrabooks or gaming laptops cover at least 90 percent of sRGB for deeper colors. The limited colors here aren't an issue when gaming, but graphics editors will want to avoid using this panel.
X-Rite colorimeter measurements show an overly warm color temperature out of the box which our own calibration is able to fix for more accurate grayscale levels. Color accuracy, however, remains below average especially when at higher saturation levels due to the narrow color space mentioned above. Blue in particular is represented more inaccurately than every other tested color by a wide margin.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.4 ms rise | |
↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.2 ms rise | |
↘ 17.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19046 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Outdoor visibility is below average as the display isn't any brighter or dimmer than the outgoing GF65 9SD. Maximum brightness is a bit lower than most gaming laptops where 300 nits or greater is more common.
Performance
MSI has updated the display (120 Hz to 144 Hz) and RAM (2666 MHz to 3200 MHz) from the older GF65 9SD. The CPU and GPU have been updated from Coffee Lake-H to Comet Lake-H and Nvidia Turing to Ampere, respectively.
Lesser Core i5-10200H and i5-10500H SKUs are also available, but the 144 Hz IPS display and GeForce RTX 3060 remain fixed on all configurations as of this writing.
We had set our system to the MSI Extreme Performance mode prior to running any performance benchmarks below.
Processor
Multi-thread CPU performance is slower than the average Core i7-10750H in our database by about 10 to 15 percent. In fact, the older Core i7-9750H in the Maingear Vector 15 is able to consistently outperform our MSI by a few percentage points in multi-threaded loads. For higher performance, users should enable Cooler Boost mode (or maximum fan mode) as detailed in our Stress Test section below.
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.4: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Aorus 15P XC | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (5.54 - 11.6, n=43) | |
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE | |
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK | |
Aorus 15P XC | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (43.1 - 99.2, n=43) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Gateway Creator Series 15.6 GWTN156-3BK | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (0.578 - 0.708, n=42) | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE | |
Aorus 15P XC | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 5390 points | |
Help |
DPC Latency
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Aorus 15G XC | |
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
Our unit comes with a 1 TB Samsung PM981 NVMe SSD but other sellers will likely have something different depending on the desired capacity and price. We're able to both reach and maintain the theoretical 3200 MB/s sequential read speed of the drive as shown by our DiskSpd loop test below.
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB | MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -7% | 10% | -4% | -7% | |
Seq Read | 3002 | 2881 -4% | 2829 -6% | 2198 -27% | 3088 3% |
Seq Write | 2420 | 1570 -35% | 2646 9% | 2596 7% | 2561 6% |
4K Read | 48.46 | 52.4 8% | 54.8 13% | 43.81 -10% | 43.01 -11% |
4K Write | 114.3 | 124 8% | 179.1 57% | 115.5 1% | 102 -11% |
4K-64 Read | 1873 | 1334 -29% | 1734 -7% | 1692 -10% | 1549 -17% |
4K-64 Write | 1882 | 2189 16% | 2396 27% | 2162 15% | 1378 -27% |
Access Time Read * | 0.045 | 0.055 -22% | 0.033 27% | 0.056 -24% | 0.051 -13% |
Access Time Write * | 0.101 | 0.03 70% | 0.021 79% | 0.098 3% | 0.037 63% |
Score Read | 2221 | 1675 -25% | 2072 -7% | 1956 -12% | 1901 -14% |
Score Write | 2238 | 2470 10% | 2839 27% | 2537 13% | 1737 -22% |
Score Total | 5565 | 4943 -11% | 5965 7% | 5513 -1% | 4583 -18% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2421 | 1277 -47% | 2119 -12% | 2236 -8% | 2684 11% |
Copy Program MB/s | 705 | 575 -18% | 406.1 -42% | 690 -2% | 544 -23% |
Copy Game MB/s | 1490 | 1272 -15% | 1086 -27% | 1546 4% | 1116 -25% |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 14% | 4% | 8% | ||
Write 4K | 157.3 | 139.1 -12% | 163.1 4% | 110.4 -30% | |
Read 4K | 46.69 | 47.59 2% | 48.97 5% | 55.1 18% | |
Write Seq | 2389 | 2917 22% | 2607 9% | ||
Read Seq | 2196 | 2586 18% | 2316 5% | ||
Write 4K Q32T1 | 407.6 | 511 25% | 338 -17% | 466.6 14% | |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 519 | 571 10% | 475.6 -8% | 517 0% | |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2401 | 3263 36% | 3090 29% | 3424 43% | |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3344 | 3567 7% | 3421 2% | 3519 5% | |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 1496 | ||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 1597 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -7% /
-7% | 12% /
12% | 0% /
-1% | 1% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance
Of the four laptops we've tested thus far with the mobile GeForce RTX 3060, our MSI GF65 is the slowest of the bunch by about 15 percent according to 3DMark benchmarks. Raw performance is still above the mobile RTX 2060 albeit only by about 15 percent. Owners of GeForce RTX 2070 laptops will still enjoy slightly faster graphics performance than this RTX 3060 laptop.
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (13799 - 30772, n=43) | |
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (19143 - 24662, n=40) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (18610 - 22670, n=24) | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (10227 - 22387, n=42) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 | |
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (9500 - 13311, n=23) | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (1107 - 14726, n=40) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM |
3DMark 11 Performance | 19718 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 35778 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 16156 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 6946 points | |
Help |
Dota 2 Reborn - 3840x2160 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (46.9 - 107, n=11) |