Schenker XMG Core 15 (Tongfang GM5NG0O) in review: A lot of performance for the fast WQHD panel

The RTX 3060 does a good job. The Schenker Core 15 brings all modern computer games smoothly onto the responsive screen (WQHD, IPS, 165 Hz). In addition, there's an NVMe SSD, 16 GB of RAM (dual-channel mode), and decent battery runtimes. The new Control Center provides extensive control over the APU and GPU performance.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), 03/09/2021 🇩🇪 🇷🇺 ...

The Schenker XMG Core 15 is a lower high-end gaming laptop. It's powered by a Ryzen 7 4800H APU and a GeForce RTX 3060 laptop GPU. Competitors include devices like the Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR, the Aorus 15G XC, the HP Omen 15, and the Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52.

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85 %	03/2021	Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2 kg	22.9 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
82 %	02/2021	Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2 kg	20 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
86 %	02/2021	Aorus 15G XC i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	23 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83 %	01/2021	HP Omen 15-en0375ng R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.2 kg	23 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82 %	12/2020	Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.1 kg	19.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

Case - Core 15 chassis made of aluminum and plastic

Schenker has opted for a discreet exterior in the 2021 model - just like in the predecessors. This allows the laptop to be used in business environments as well. The differences to the 2020 model are marginal. Most noticeable: The webcam of the 2021 model has moved back to its usual position above the display (2020 model: below the display). The top of the base unit and the back of the lid of the all-black chassis are made of aluminum, while the rest of the components are made of plastic. The laptop doesn't have a maintenance hatch, and the battery is permanently is firmly built into the device.

The laptop doesn't reveal any manufacturing flaws. The gap dimensions are in order, and there are no material protrusions. There's nothing to criticize in terms of stability, either. The rigid base unit can be twisted minimally at best, and the whole situation is completely within limits when it comes to the lid. The hinges keep the lid firmly in position, but they let it wobble a bit. Moreover, the maximum aperture angle is 135 degrees, and opening the lid with one hand is possible.

Within our comparison field, the Core 15 is one of the lightest and most compact devices.

Connectivity - Schenker laptop without Thunderbolt

The Core 15 comes with a total of three USB Type-A ports (2x USB 3.2 Gen 1, 1x USB 2.0). In addition, there's a USB Type-C port (USB 3.2 Gen 2) that supports DisplayPort via USB-C (version 1.4, G-Sync compatible). Together with the HDMI connection (version 2.1), the laptop has, therefore, two video outputs. Connectivity is rounded off by a Gigabit Ethernet port and two audio connections.

Left side: Cable-lock slot, USB 2.0 (Type-A), microphone in, headphone out

Right side: Memory card reader (SD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A)

Back: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-C; DisplayPort 1.4, G-Sync), HDMI 2.1 (with HDCP 2.3), Gigabit Ethernet, power supply

SD card reader

With transfer rates of 82 MB/s (copying of 250 jpg image files of 5 MB each) and 89 MB/s (copying large data blocks), the SD memory card reader (reference card: 64 GB Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II SDXC) is a moderately fast model. Furthermore, SD cards protrude a good 17 mm from the card reader.

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 15G XC (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	190 MB/s ∼100% +132%
Average of class Gaming (18 - 222, n=97, last 2 years)	109 MB/s ∼57% +33%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	82 MB/s ∼43%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	71 MB/s ∼37% -13%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus 15G XC (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	212 MB/s ∼100% +138%
Average of class Gaming (20.5 - 248, n=97, last 2 years)	122 MB/s ∼58% +37%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	89 MB/s ∼42%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	88 MB/s ∼42% -1%

Communication

The WLAN chip (Intel AX200) supports the 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax standard and offers Bluetooth 5 functionality. The data rates determined under optimal conditions (no other WLAN devices nearby, short distance between laptop and server PC) turn out to be excellent. Wired network connections are handled by the Realtek RTL8125 Gigabit Ethernet controller. It performs its tasks smoothly.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1440 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1380 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1330 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Aorus 15G XC Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1330 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (523 - 1640, n=98)	1169 MBit/s ∼81% -19%
Average of class Gaming (274 - 1720, n=171, last 2 years)	1046 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	542 MBit/s ∼38% -62%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1510 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1220 MBit/s ∼81% -19%
Aorus 15G XC Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1100 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (447 - 1645, n=97)	1083 MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	973 MBit/s ∼64% -36%
Average of class Gaming (252 - 1645, n=171, last 2 years)	973 MBit/s ∼64% -36%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	642 MBit/s ∼43% -57%

Webcam

The webcam (0.9 MP) produces images in a maximum resolution of 1280x720 pixels. There are problems with color accuracy. With a color deviation of almost 14, the target (Delta E less than 3) is missed.

ColorChecker HP Omen 15-en0375ng: 17.92 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 27.71 ∆E

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck.net/Acer-Predator-Triton-300-PT315-Laptop-Review-A-120-Hz-Panel-Could-Be-Better.509368.0.html">Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP</a> — Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck.net/HP-Omen-15-laptop-Review-Strong-AMD-processor-makes-Intel-tremble.512679.0.html">HP Omen 15-en0375ng</a> — HP Omen 15-en0375ng

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck.net/Aorus-15G-XC-Gaming-Laptop-review-Features-suffer-setback-in-favor-of-an-upgrade-to-RTX-3070.521426.0.html">Aorus 15G XC</a> — Aorus 15G XC

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck.net/Schenker-XMG-Core-15-Tongfang-GM5NG0O-in-review-A-lot-of-performance-for-the-fast-WQHD-panel.526888.0.html">Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere</a> — Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere

Accessories

Besides warranty information, the laptop comes with a recovery DVD and a mousepad.

Maintenance

Maintenance and upgrade procedures can be carried out without issues. After removing all screws on the underside of the device, the bottom cover can be lifted off. In the case of our test device, no additional tools were needed for this. Otherwise, a grout finishing tool or a flat spatula can help.

Warranty

The base warranty is two years - including pick-up service and a six-month quick repair program (repairs within 48 hours). A 36-month warranty costs 80 to 119 Euros (~$95 to ~$141) - depending on the selected quick-repair period.

Input devices - Schenker installs a backlit keyboard

Keyboard

The Schenker laptop has a backlit chiclet keyboard (RGB lighting) that includes a numeric keypad. However, the latter lacks the fourth column and consequently the second "Enter" key. The flat, smooth keys have a medium travel and a clear pressure point. We like the key resistance, and the keyboard doesn't yield during typing. Moreover, the four-stage backlight is controlled with two function keys. All in all, you get a keyboard that is suitable for everyday use here.

Touchpad

The smooth surface of the multitouch-capable ClickPad (about 11.6 x 7.4 cm) makes it easy for fingers to glide on it. The pad responds to inputs in the corners as well. It has a short travel and a clear pressure point.

Display - 165 Hz IPS

The brightness (327.6 cd/m²) and contrast (1,285:1) of the matte 15.6-inch display (WQHD, 2560x1440 pixels) are good. In addition, the 165 Hz panel used here offers fast response times. Positive: The display doesn't show PWM flickering. Schenker also offers a Full HD display (IPS, 240 Hz) as an alternative.


334 cd/m²	337 cd/m²	339 cd/m²
324 cd/m²	347 cd/m²	319 cd/m²
318 cd/m²	320 cd/m²	310 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 347 cd/m² Average: 327.6 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Contrast: 1285:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.66 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6, calibrated: 1.23
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
94% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.278

ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60	Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR LQ156M1JW26 (SHP1532), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Aorus 15G XC Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	HP Omen 15-en0375ng BOE0852, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP BOE08FB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Response Times		12%	22%	-103%	-95%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	14.8 (7.6, 7.2)	12 (6.8, 5.2) 19%	9.6 (5.2, 4.4) 35%	30.4 (16.4, 14) -105%	29.2 (14.4, 14.8) -97%
Response Time Black / White *	10.4 (5.2, 5.2)	10 (5.6, 4.4) 4%	9.6 (4.8, 4.8) 8%	20.8 (11.6, 9.2) -100%	20 (9.6, 10.4) -92%
PWM Frequency		23580 (30)	24040 (24)	200 (99)
Screen		-26%	-0%	-107%	-127%
Brightness middle	347	286 -18%	288 -17%	297 -14%	279 -20%
Brightness	328	275 -16%	270 -18%	275 -16%	257 -22%
Brightness Distribution	89	91 2%	89 0%	88 -1%	89 0%
Black Level *	0.27	0.25 7%	0.25 7%	0.33 -22%	0.31 -15%
Contrast	1285	1144 -11%	1152 -10%	900 -30%	900 -30%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	1.66	2.43 -46%	1.19 28%	4.54 -173%	5.84 -252%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	3.03	6.33 -109%	3.79 -25%	18.92 -524%	21.8 -619%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *	1.23	0.83 33%	0.71 42%	4.66 -279%	4.54 -269%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	1.6	3.5 -119%	1.6 -0%	2.1 -31%	3.1 -94%
Gamma	2.278 ^97%	2.32 ^95%	2.229 ^99%	2.066 ^106%	2.116 ^104%
CCT	6430 ^101%	7145 ^91%	6539 ^99%	6291 ^103%	6577 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	71	68 -4%	67 -6%	40 -44%	41 -42%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	94	91 -3%	90 -4%	58 -38%	59 -37%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-7% / -20%	11% / 3%	-105% / -106%	-111% / -122%

* ... smaller is better

Already out of the box, the display shows good color reproduction. With a color deviation of just under 1.7, the target (Delta E less than 3) is met. Moreover, the display doesn't suffer from a blue tint. Slight improvements are achieved through calibration: Color deviation drops to 1.23, and grayscales are displayed in a more balanced way. The AdobeRGB (71%) and sRGB (94%) color spaces aren't completely reproduced.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.2 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.6 ms rise
14.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9644 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

The viewing-angle stable IPS panel can be read from any position. Reading the display outdoors is possible when the sun doesn't shine too brightly.

Performance - RTX 3060 can develop its full potential

Schenker's 15.6-inch gaming laptop brings every modern game smoothly onto the screen and also cuts a fine figure in all other application areas. The device can be individually customized in Schenker's online store.

Test conditions - The new Control Center

The preinstalled Control Center allows the selection of a performance profile ("Balanced", "Enthusiast", "Overboost"), among other things. We performed our test with the "Overboost" profile active and automatic fan control. We used the "Enthusiast" profile for the battery tests. A button next to the power button allows the user to quickly switch between performance profiles.

The completely redesigned Control Center offers significantly more ways to influence performance compared to the predecessor version. For instance, the CPU's power limits, the GPU's TGP, and the CPU's and GPU's upper temperature limits can be adjusted. Five subprofiles can - but don't have to - be defined for each of the three performance profiles, so that, for example, individual usage scenarios can be addressed.

Processor

The Core 15 is powered by a Ryzen 7 4800H (Renoir). The CPU part of the APU consists of an octa-core processor that operates at a base speed of 2.9 GHz. An increase to up to 4.3 GHz is possible via Turbo. Simultaneous multithreading (two threads can be processed per core) is supported.

The multithread tests of the Cinebench benchmarks are run at 4 to 4.2 GHz (plugged in) and 2.9 to 3 GHz (battery power). The single-thread tests are processed at 1.4 to 4.3 GHz (when plugged in and on batter power).

We check whether the CPU Turbo is used consistently when plugged in by running the Cinebench R15 benchmark's multithread test in a loop for a minimum of 30 minutes. Turbo is used to a great extent.

Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1889 (1855.2-1933.08)

Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H; Balanced: Ø1605 (1588.88-1651.53)

Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H; Enthusiast: Ø1813 (1801.8-1849.45)

Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Core i7-11370H: Ø1042 (1014.95-1086.9)

Aorus 15G XC Intel Core i7-10870H: Ø1594 (1555.21-1697.72)

HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1886 (1812.99-1909.31)

Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1209 (1180.53-1317.18)

Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1866 (1840.26-1926.13)

CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Overboost)

CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Enthusiast)

CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Balanced)

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

191 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1933 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

99.53 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Core i7-11370H	231 Points ∼100% +21%
Aorus 15G XC Intel Core i7-10870H	204 Points ∼88% +7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	199 Points ∼86% +4%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	191 Points ∼83%
Average of class Gaming (108 - 254, n=204, last 2 years)	190 Points ∼82% -1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	188 Points ∼81% -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (186 - 191, n=15)	188 Points ∼81% -2%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	187 Points ∼81% -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1933 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1926 Points ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1909 (1812.99^min - 1909.31^max) Points ∼99% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (1652 - 1995, n=21)	1859 Points ∼96% -4%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Enthusiast)	1849 Points ∼96% -4%
Aorus 15G XC Intel Core i7-10870H	1740 Points ∼90% -10%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Balanced)	1652 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming (536 - 2804, n=211, last 2 years)	1386 Points ∼72% -28%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	1317 (1180.53^min - 1317.18^max) Points ∼68% -32%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Core i7-11370H	1086 (631.76^min - 1047.34^max) Points ∼56% -44%

Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Core i7-11370H	467 Seconds * ∼100% -85%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	372 Seconds * ∼80% -48%
Average of class Gaming (179 - 643, n=125, last 2 years)	351 Seconds * ∼75% -39%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Balanced)	298 Seconds * ∼64% -18%
Aorus 15G XC Intel Core i7-10870H	288 Seconds * ∼62% -14%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (248 - 299, n=15)	266 Seconds * ∼57% -6%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Enthusiast)	264 Seconds * ∼57% -5%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	259 Seconds * ∼55% -3%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	255 Seconds * ∼55% -1%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	252 Seconds * ∼54%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	52459 MIPS ∼100%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Enthusiast)	51884 MIPS ∼99% -1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	50075 MIPS ∼95% -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (44827 - 53883, n=15)	49860 MIPS ∼95% -5%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	48326 MIPS ∼92% -8%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Balanced)	48319 MIPS ∼92% -8%
Aorus 15G XC Intel Core i7-10870H	45427 MIPS ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming (15146 - 75612, n=126, last 2 years)	40706 MIPS ∼78% -22%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	34772 MIPS ∼66% -34%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Core i7-11370H	26791 MIPS ∼51% -49%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Aorus 15G XC Intel Core i7-10870H	5288 MIPS ∼100% +11%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Core i7-11370H	5128 MIPS ∼97% +8%
Average of class Gaming (2945 - 6174, n=126, last 2 years)	5083 MIPS ∼96% +7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	5052 MIPS ∼96% +7%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4743 MIPS ∼90%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Balanced)	4736 MIPS ∼90% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Enthusiast)	4725 MIPS ∼89% 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (4575 - 4743, n=15)	4678 MIPS ∼88% -1%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4664 MIPS ∼88% -2%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4638 MIPS ∼88% -2%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Core i7-11370H	519 Points ∼100% +6%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	490 Points ∼94%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Enthusiast)	489 Points ∼94% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Balanced)	489 Points ∼94% 0%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	486 Points ∼94% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (462 - 491, n=17)	482 Points ∼93% -2%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	475 Points ∼92% -3%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	473 Points ∼91% -3%
Average of class Gaming (312 - 634, n=171, last 2 years)	467 Points ∼90% -5%
Aorus 15G XC Intel Core i7-10870H	460 Points ∼89% -6%
CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4457 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4435 Points ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4380 Points ∼98% -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (3692 - 4663, n=18)	4275 Points ∼96% -4%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Enthusiast)	4213 Points ∼95% -5%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Balanced)	3692 Points ∼83% -17%
Aorus 15G XC Intel Core i7-10870H	3365 Points ∼75% -25%
Average of class Gaming (1397 - 6321, n=172, last 2 years)	3237 Points ∼73% -27%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	2991 Points ∼67% -33%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Core i7-11370H	2199 Points ∼49% -51%

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	8103 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Enthusiast)	8098 Points ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	8073 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Balanced)	7955 Points ∼98% -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (5920 - 8672, n=17)	7725 Points ∼95% -5%
Aorus 15G XC Intel Core i7-10870H	7693 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming (2783 - 11393, n=122, last 2 years)	6958 Points ∼86% -14%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	6906 Points ∼85% -15%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	6365 Points ∼79% -21%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Core i7-11370H	4733 Points ∼58% -42%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Core i7-11370H	1376 Points ∼100% +14%
Aorus 15G XC Intel Core i7-10870H	1288 Points ∼94% +7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	1286 Points ∼93% +7%
Average of class Gaming (703 - 1777, n=122, last 2 years)	1261 Points ∼92% +5%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1204 Points ∼88%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1203 Points ∼87% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Enthusiast)	1203 Points ∼87% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Balanced)	1191 Points ∼87% -1%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1188 Points ∼86% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (1154 - 1207, n=17)	1188 Points ∼86% -1%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	13.7 fps ∼100%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Enthusiast)	13.3 fps ∼97% -3%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	12.9 fps ∼94% -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (10.8 - 14.1, n=16)	12.6 fps ∼92% -8%
Aorus 15G XC Intel Core i7-10870H	12.4 fps ∼91% -9%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	12.1 fps ∼88% -12%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Balanced)	11.8 fps ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming (4.35 - 19.8, n=125, last 2 years)	11.1 fps ∼81% -19%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	9.61 fps ∼70% -30%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Core i7-11370H	8.16 fps ∼60% -40%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	69.2 s * ∼100% -19%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (28.6 - 95.8, n=14)	63.8 s * ∼92% -10%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	60.16 s * ∼87% -4%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	58 s * ∼84%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Core i7-11370H	56.5 s * ∼82% +3%
Average of class Gaming (23.9 - 98.2, n=109, last 2 years)	55 s * ∼79% +5%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Enthusiast)	54.7 s * ∼79% +6%
Aorus 15G XC Intel Core i7-10870H	54.3 s * ∼78% +6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	47.2 s * ∼68% +19%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H	0.607 sec * ∼100% -6%
Average of class Gaming (0.4981 - 1.088, n=113, last 2 years)	0.597 sec * ∼98% -5%
Aorus 15G XC Intel Core i7-10870H	0.588 sec * ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.583 sec * ∼96% -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (0.562 - 0.603, n=15)	0.579 sec * ∼95% -1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.575 sec * ∼95% -1%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.571 sec * ∼94%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Enthusiast)	0.565 sec * ∼93% +1%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Core i7-11370H	0.562 sec * ∼93% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Balanced)	0.562 sec * ∼93% +2%

* ... smaller is better

System performance

The laptop offers enough computing power for performance-demanding application areas like gaming, video editing, and image processing for years to come. The system also works well and smoothly. In addition, the PCMark results are very good.

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4644 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		6339 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5453 points
PCMark 10 Score		6110 points
Help

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10 - Score
Aorus 15G XC GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4	6408 Points ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	6110 Points ∼95%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	6110 Points ∼95% 0%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	6088 Points ∼95% 0%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	5766 Points ∼90% -6%
Average of class Gaming (3952 - 7884, n=185, last 2 years)	5729 Points ∼89% -6%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	5427 Points ∼85% -11%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	5193 Points ∼81% -15%

PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	5983 Points ∼100% +10%
Average of class Gaming (4265 - 6825, n=128, last 2 years)	5555 Points ∼93% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	5453 Points ∼91%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	5453 Points ∼91% 0%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	5197 Points ∼100% +12%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	4644 Points ∼89%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	4644 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Gaming (2832 - 6277, n=127, last 2 years)	4450 Points ∼86% -4%

DPC latencies

In our standardized latency monitor test (web surfing, 4K video playback, high-load Prime95), we didn't observe any irregularities regarding DPC latencies. The system seems to be suitable for real-time video and audio editing.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Aorus 15G XC GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4	2345.1 μs * ∼100% -371%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	1781 μs * ∼76% -257%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	1767.3 μs * ∼75% -255%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1122 μs * ∼48% -125%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	775.7 μs * ∼33% -56%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	498.2 μs * ∼21%

* ... smaller is better

Storage

An NVMe SSD (M.2-2280) from Samsung serves as system drive. It provides 1 TB of storage space and delivers very good transfer rates. The laptop can accommodate a total of two NVMe SSDs. In addition, RAID 0 is supported.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3567 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3263 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 570.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 511 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2586 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2917 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 47.59 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 139.1 MB/s

	Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	Aorus 15G XC ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4	HP Omen 15-en0375ng WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-21%	-9%	-12%	-12%	13%
Write 4K	139.1	129.6 -7%	137.6 -1%	119.6 -14%	117.5 -16%	233 68%
Read 4K	47.59	44.71 -6%	45.87 -4%	47.4 0%	47.36 0%	54.5 15%
Write Seq	2917	1929 -34%	2304 -21%	2677 -8%	2748 -6%	3050 5%
Read Seq	2586	2035 -21%	1052 -59%	2220 -14%	2084 -19%	3042 18%
Write 4K Q32T1	511	425.9 -17%	600.9 18%	427.4 -16%	407.3 -20%	519.5 2%
Read 4K Q32T1	570.6	433.4 -24%	677.1 19%	549.2 -4%	474.6 -17%	546.1 -4%
Write Seq Q32T1	3263	1390 -57%	2536 -22%	2706 -17%	3069 -6%	3241 -1%
Read Seq Q32T1	3567	3505 -2%	3372 -5%	2869 -20%	3154 -12%	3538 -1%
AS SSD		-58%	-53%	-41%	-28%	-5%
Score Total	5965	4105 -31%	4645 -22%	5075 -15%	5205 -13%	5184 -13%
Score Write	2839	1869 -34%	1815 -36%	2449 -14%	2309 -19%	2734 -4%
Score Read	2072	1516 -27%	1859 -10%	1738 -16%	1915 -8%	1627 -21%
Access Time Write *	0.021	0.055 -162%	0.038 -81%	0.022 -5%	0.036 -71%	0.02 5%
Access Time Read *	0.033	0.093 -182%	0.131 -297%	0.138 -318%	0.06 -82%	0.034 -3%
4K-64 Write	2395.54	1649.93 -31%	1472.95 -39%	2060.9 -14%	1960.96 -18%	2297.92 -4%
4K-64 Read	1734.11	1209.4 -30%	1605.68 -7%	1463.06 -16%	1637.26 -6%	1282.5 -26%
4K Write	179.06	68.99 -61%	101.6 -43%	175.13 -2%	103.18 -42%	190.52 6%
4K Read	54.77	39.65 -28%	48.27 -12%	49.5 -10%	40.61 -26%	60.37 10%
Seq Write	2646.07	1501.32 -43%	2403 -9%	2129.44 -20%	2446.49 -8%	2452 -7%
Seq Read	2829.03	2671.27 -6%	2048 -28%	2255.25 -20%	2368.75 -16%	2836 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-40% / -42%	-31% / -35%	-27% / -29%	-20% / -21%	4% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB: Ø3560 (3295.46-3567.67)

Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N: Ø3502 (3033.55-3522.88)

Aorus 15G XC GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4: Ø2418 (2177.68-2443.12)

HP Omen 15-en0375ng GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G: Ø2873 (2626.47-2883.9)

Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00: Ø1772 (1303.29-1792.02)

Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB: Ø3549 (3352.29-3568.72)

Graphics card

The GeForce RTX 3060 laptop graphics core is Nvidia's current entry-level high-end GPU model. The GPU can access fast GDDR6 graphics memory (6,144 MB). The Vega 7 graphics core integrated into the processor is active, and the laptop works with Nvidia's Optimus graphics-switching solution. The Vega 7 iGPU can be disabled within the BIOS or via the Control Center.

Laptop manufacturers can freely select the TGP and, therefore, the maximum available computing power of an RTX 3000 graphics core within the limits defined by Nvidia (overview of all RTX 3060 laptops including their TGPs). Schenker has set the TGP of the RTX 3060 to 120 watts (115 watts + 5 watts Dynamic Boost) in its default state. The Dynamic Boost has to be increased to 15 watts via the Control Center in order to use the potential maximum of 130 watts.

Since Schenker almost completely utilizes the TGP, the Core 15 scores very well in the GPU and gaming tests. The Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR, which is equipped with the nominally more powerful GeForce RTX 3070 laptop GPU, is clearly outperformed in some cases. The reason: Asus has set the TGP of the RTX 3070 at 85 watts, which is very low.

Fire Strike Ultra (Overboost, TGP: 130 watts)

3DMark 11 Performance		22955 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		52213 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		18524 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		8496 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus 15G XC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H	32623 Points ∼100% +18%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	27741 Points ∼85%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (23840 - 30200, n=4)	27017 Points ∼83% -3%
Average of class Gaming (4545 - 43077, n=190, last 2 years)	23763 Points ∼73% -14%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	21748 Points ∼67% -22%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	21338 Points ∼65% -23%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	20535 Points ∼63% -26%

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Aorus 15G XC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H	9448 Points ∼100% +12%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	8425 Points ∼89%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (7041 - 8840, n=5)	8182 Points ∼87% -3%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H	7888 Points ∼83% -6%
Average of class Gaming (852 - 13144, n=194, last 2 years)	6925 Points ∼73% -18%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	6012 Points ∼64% -29%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	5848 Points ∼62% -31%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	5819 Points ∼62% -31%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus 15G XC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H	24648 Points ∼100% +23%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H	20703 Points ∼84% +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (18434 - 22460, n=5)	20612 Points ∼84% +3%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	20081 Points ∼81%
Average of class Gaming (2932 - 32366, n=198, last 2 years)	17988 Points ∼73% -10%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	16355 Points ∼66% -19%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	15746 Points ∼64% -22%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	15499 Points ∼63% -23%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Aorus 15G XC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H	140896 Points ∼100% +8%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	130964 Points ∼93%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (117148 - 136275, n=4)	129153 Points ∼92% -1%
Average of class Gaming (23059 - 192950, n=174, last 2 years)	102426 Points ∼73% -22%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H	93408 Points ∼66% -29%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	63804 Points ∼45% -51%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	62787 Points ∼45% -52%

Gaming performance

The hardware can bring all the latest games smoothly onto the screen. The display's full resolution (2560x1440 pixels, WQHD) and high to maximum quality settings can usually be used. Maximum quality settings can be applied consistently when playing in Full HD resolution.

Our technical article on the RTX 3060 GPU provides an overview of the frame rates achieved in the games in our database at different resolutions and quality settings.

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Aorus 15G XC Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	92.3 (74^min) fps ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	88.5 (77^min - 102^max) fps ∼96%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (68.7 - 88.5, n=6)	77.9 fps ∼84% -12%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	76.7 fps ∼83% -13%
Average of class Gaming (24.3 - 123, n=194, last 2 years)	69.5 fps ∼75% -21%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	59.1 (49^min) fps ∼64% -33%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	58.8 (48^min) fps ∼64% -34%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	56.4 fps ∼61% -36%

Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	98 (75^min - 124^max) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (97 - 98, n=2)	97.5 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Gaming (20 - 146, n=44, last 2 years)	89.3 fps ∼91% -9%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	83 fps ∼85% -15%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	76 fps ∼78% -22%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Aorus 15G XC Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	109 fps ∼100% +30%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	86 (63^min) fps ∼79% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (84 - 85, n=2)	84.5 fps ∼78% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	84 fps ∼77%
Average of class Gaming (29 - 151, n=104, last 2 years)	79.7 fps ∼73% -5%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	73 fps ∼67% -13%

Horizon Zero Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultimate Quality
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	81 (48^min - 129^max) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (70 - 81, n=2)	75.5 fps ∼93% -7%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	70 (10^min) fps ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming (34 - 104, n=28, last 2 years)	64.8 fps ∼80% -20%

Serious Sam 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra (DX12) AA:2xMS
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (67.1 - 78.3, n=2)	72.7 fps ∼100% +8%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	67.1 (14.6^min, 27^P0.1, 39.3^P1 - 111^max) fps ∼92%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	66.4 fps ∼91% -1%
Average of class Gaming (10.8 - 107, n=25, last 2 years)	63.9 fps ∼88% -5%

Immortals Fenyx Rising - 1920x1080 Very High Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (77 - 83, n=2)	80 fps ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	77 (43^min - 121^max) fps ∼96%
Average of class Gaming (33 - 108, n=13, last 2 years)	76.5 fps ∼96% -1%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	70 (20^min) fps ∼88% -9%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	51 fps ∼64% -34%

In order to verify whether the frame rates remain largely constant over a prolonged period of time, we let the game The Witcher 3 run for about 60 minutes at Full HD resolution and maximum quality settings. The character is not moved. A drop in frame rates wasn't found.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit in comparison
Toshiba Satellite W30Dt-A-100 (min) A4-1200, Radeon HD 8180	33
...
HP Omen 15-en0375ng R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	1909
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	1926
Eluktronics RP-17 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	1932
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	1933
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	1944
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS i9-9900KS, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	1962
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	1968
...
(max) R9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX	4492

3DMark 11 in comparison
Lenovo Flex 5-1570 81CA000RUS (min) i5-8550U, GeForce MX130	28
...
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	22730
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	22748
R7 2700X, RX Vega 56	22937
Schenker XMG Core 15 Ampere R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	22955
i3-9100F, NVIDIA Titan RTX	23108
R7 2700X, RX Vega 64	23122
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	23165
...
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (max) R9 5950X, Radeon RX 6900 XT	42418

Schenker XMG Core 15 (Tongfang GM5NG0O) in review: A lot of performance for the fast WQHD panel

Possible contenders in comparison

Case - Core 15 chassis made of aluminum and plastic

Size comparison

Connectivity - Schenker laptop without Thunderbolt

SD card reader

Communication

Webcam

Accessories

Maintenance

Warranty

Input devices - Schenker installs a backlit keyboard

Keyboard

Touchpad

Display - 165 Hz IPS

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Performance - RTX 3060 can develop its full potential

Test conditions - The new Control Center

Processor

System performance

DPC latencies

Storage

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Graphics card

Gaming performance