Notebookcheck

Eurocom Sky X4C Core i9-9900KS Laptop Review: Unlocked Desktop Processor in a Mobile Form Factor

Allen Ngo 👁, 11/28/2019

127 W Core i9 Intel inside. The three-year old Clevo P751DM2 chassis is beginning to show its age. While the system can handle Intel's latest Core i9 CPU, it can't fully exploit the high Turbo Boost potential of the processor without running at temperatures well beyond 90 C.

The Eurocom Sky X4C is a high-performance laptop with easy serviceability aimed at enthusiasts. Unlike most other laptops, it carries upgradeable LGA 1151 desktop CPUs and MXM GPUs for added versatility.

We had checked out the Sky X4C almost two years ago with the Coffee Lake Core i7-8700K CPU and Pascal GeForce GTX 1080 GPU. Our unit today comes equipped with the faster and newer Coffee Lake Core i9-9900KS and Turing GeForce RTX 2080. We recommend checking out our existing review on the Sky X4C as all our comments on the chassis and its features still apply.

More Eurocom reviews:

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Especially English native speakers welcome!

Currently wanted: 
News and Editorial Editor - Details here

Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS (Sky Series)
Processor
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Core: 1380 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, 441.2
Memory
32768 MB 
, DDR4-3003, Corsair, 16-18-18-39, dual-channel, 4x SODIMM slots
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN07.0, IPS, AUO70ED, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Z370 (Kaby Lake)
Storage
Soundcard
NVIDIA TU104 - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 2-in-1 Audio Jack (Headphone, S/PDIF); Microphone-in; Line-out; Line-in, Card Reader: SD
Networking
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 38 x 386 x 262 ( = 1.5 x 15.2 x 10.31 in)
Battery
82 Wh Lithium-Ion, removeable, 14.8V
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2 MP (FHD)
Additional features
Speakers: 2 W stereo, Keyboard: Beveled, Keyboard Light: yes, Control Center 2.0, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
3.55 kg ( = 125.22 oz / 7.83 pounds), Power Supply: 1.42 kg ( = 50.09 oz / 3.13 pounds)
Price
3800 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionBest Price
85%11/2019Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
3.6 kg38 mm15.6"1920x1080
87%07/2018MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
8750H, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
2.9 kg40 mm15.6"1920x1080
86%05/2019MSI GE75 9SG
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
2.7 kg27.5 mm17.3"1920x1080
88%03/2019Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
4.3 kg41 mm17.3"1920x1080
86%03/2019Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
3.9 kg42 mm17.3"1920x1080

Case

402.6 mm / 15.9 inch 319.2 mm / 12.6 inch 42 mm / 1.654 inch 3.9 kg8.53 lbs390 mm / 15.4 inch 266 mm / 10.5 inch 40 mm / 1.575 inch 2.9 kg6.44 lbs386 mm / 15.2 inch 262 mm / 10.3 inch 38 mm / 1.496 inch 3.6 kg7.83 lbs383 mm / 15.1 inch 260 mm / 10.2 inch 27.5 mm / 1.083 inch 2.4 kg5.34 lbs362 mm / 14.3 inch 265 mm / 10.4 inch 25 mm / 0.984 inch 2.3 kg5.03 lbs360 mm / 14.2 inch 275 mm / 10.8 inch 25 mm / 0.984 inch 2.4 kg5.35 lbs

Connectivity

(Source: Eurocom)
(Source: Eurocom)

SD Card Reader

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
193.9 MB/s ∼100%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
181.3 MB/s ∼94% -6%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
178 MB/s ∼92% -8%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
149 MB/s ∼77% -23%
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
11.67 MB/s ∼6% -94%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
201.96 MB/s ∼100%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
200 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198 MB/s ∼98% -2%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
192.5 MB/s ∼95% -5%
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
13.44 MB/s ∼7% -93%

Communication

The Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x module is essentially a rebranded Intel AX200/201 and so performance is similar between them. Instead, the AX1650x benefits from Killer-specific features and controls.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1291 (min: 1212, max: 1379) MBit/s ∼100%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
685 MBit/s ∼53%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
640 (min: 541, max: 677) MBit/s ∼50%
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
633 MBit/s ∼49%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
615 (min: 508, max: 642) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1374 (min: 720, max: 1484) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
629 (min: 602, max: 651) MBit/s ∼46%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
580 (min: 497, max: 619) MBit/s ∼42%
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
570 MBit/s ∼41%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
540 MBit/s ∼39%

Maintenance

Accessories and Warranty

The usual manuals, HDD/SSD screws, and Drivers CD are included with optional adapters, docks, and inverters. A one-year limited warranty applies with extensions of up to three years.

Display

Unlike the glossy 4K UHD 60 Hz panel on our 2018 SKy X4C, our latest unit comes with a matte FHD 144 Hz panel. The AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 panel here can also be found on both the Schenker XMG Ultra 15 and Gigabyte Aorus X5 v8 meaning that these three laptops share similar display qualities including the fast response times, good contrast ratio, and decent color coverage. When compared to the 4K UHD option, the FHD option exhibits less ghosting.

Heavy uneven backlight bleeding is present on our test unit as shown by the picture below. We recommend checking for this immediately as the light bleed can be distracting during video playback or other darkened applications.

Matte panel with 4K UHD options
Matte panel with 4K UHD options
Thick bezels
Thick bezels
Heavy uneven backlight bleeding
Heavy uneven backlight bleeding
Subpixel array
Subpixel array
284.1
cd/m²
285.5
cd/m²
254.2
cd/m²
259.9
cd/m²
258.8
cd/m²
237.5
cd/m²
261.9
cd/m²
251
cd/m²
233.4
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B156HAN07.0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 285.5 cd/m² Average: 258.5 cd/m² Minimum: 11.89 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 258.8 cd/m²
Contrast: 924:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.45 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 3
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
90.5% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 58.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
AU Optronics B156HAN07.0, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
Chi Mei N156HHE-GA1 (CMN15F4), TN LED, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
BOE NV156FHM-N4J, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
N156HHE-GA1, TN, 15.6, 1920x1080
Eurocom Sky X4C
ID: SHP142A, Name: LQ156D1JX01B, IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
Response Times
38%
14%
-3%
48%
-154%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
43%
15 (8, 7)
11%
19 (9, 10)
-13%
8.4 (4.4, 4)
50%
33.6 (19.6, 14)
-100%
Response Time Black / White *
10.8 (5.2, 5.6)
7.2 (5, 2.2)
33%
9 (5, 4)
17%
10 (6, 4)
7%
5.8 (4.4, 1.4)
46%
33.2 (21.2, 12)
-207%
PWM Frequency
26000 (25)
250 (20)
25510 (34)
1000 (20)
Screen
22%
7%
44%
18%
11%
Brightness middle
258.8
285
10%
309
19%
477
84%
307.1
19%
324.7
25%
Brightness
258
273
6%
284
10%
431
67%
276
7%
318
23%
Brightness Distribution
82
84
2%
88
7%
84
2%
80
-2%
81
-1%
Black Level *
0.28
0.23
18%
0.42
-50%
0.175
37%
0.37
-32%
0.26
7%
Contrast
924
1239
34%
736
-20%
2726
195%
830
-10%
1249
35%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.45
3.52
21%
3.99
10%
4.17
6%
2.53
43%
4.67
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.85
5.18
47%
8.3
16%
6.97
29%
4.66
53%
8.16
17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3
1.12
63%
2.51
16%
2.82
6%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.8
3.41
41%
5.43
6%
3.49
40%
1.7
71%
5.9
-2%
Gamma
2.36 93%
2.05 107%
2.57 86%
2.5 88%
2.194 100%
2.14 103%
CCT
7651 85%
7077 92%
7767 84%
7076 92%
6893 94%
7176 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58.8
77
31%
63
7%
60
2%
76
29%
61.1
4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90.5
100
10%
97
7%
91
1%
100
10%
96.1
6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
30% / 25%
11% / 8%
21% / 36%
33% / 22%
-72% / -17%

* ... smaller is better

Color space covers approximately 59 percent and 91 percent of the AdobeRGB and sRGB standards, respectively, to be similar to all other 15.6-inch 144 Hz panels currently in the market. The only other high refresh rate panel that can offer a significantly wider gamut at the moment is the 120 Hz panel on the latest Razer Blade Pro 17.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

The panel is not well-calibrated out of the box and color temperature is far too cool. Average grayscale and color deltaE values sit at 5.8 and 4.7 compared to 2.1 and 1.77, respectively, after calibrating the panel ourselves. Eurocom will pre-calibrate the laptop before shipping at an additional cost.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 5.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9338 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Outdoor visibility is worse than the 4K UHD option since this FHD panel is dimmer. Viewing angles are still excellent except if viewing from abnormally wide angles where contrast and colors begin to degrade.

Outdoors on an overcast day
Outdoors on an overcast day
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors on an overcast day
Outdoors on an overcast day
Wide IPS viewing angles
Wide IPS viewing angles

Performance

The Core i9-9900KS (S for Special Edition) is essentially identical to the Core i9-9900K with a couple of differences as described by their respective product pages here. From a pure performance point-of-view, the Special Edition SKU has a higher base clock rate of 4 GHz compared to 3.6 GHz on i9-9900K. In practice, however, the two CPUs perform nearly identically on laptops due to having similar Turbo Boost clock rate potential.

LatencyMon shows no DPC latency issues when the wireless is enabled or disabled. G-Sync is supported since there is no Optimus.

 

Processor

The octa-core Core i9-9900KS offers approximately 45 percent faster multi-thread performance than both the hexa-core Core i7-8700K on our older Sky X4C and the Core i9-9980HK in the latest Apple MacBook Pro 15. Nonetheless, raw performance is only within 1 to 2 percent of the Core i9-9900K. Performance sustainability is good, but we think it could be a little better; running CineBench R15 Multi-Thread in a loop results in an 8 percent dip in performance over time. The more massive MSI GT76 is able to sustain faster clock rates for longer with the "slower" Core i9-9900K as shown by our graph below.

CineBench R10 32-bit
CineBench R10 32-bit
CineBench R11.5 64-bit
CineBench R11.5 64-bit
CineBench R15
CineBench R15
CineBench R20
CineBench R20
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610162016301640165016601670168016901700171017201730174017501760177017801790180018101820183018401850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000201020202030Tooltip
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), , Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1835 (1810.86-1981.87)
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1875 (1847.15-1952.27)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1998 (1943.92-2022.14)
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1887 (1855.46-1948.65)
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
514 Points ∼100% +1%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
509 Points ∼99%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
498 Points ∼97% -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20
Intel Core i9-9980HK
481 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Core i7-10710U
460 Points ∼89% -10%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
441 Points ∼86% -13%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
416 Points ∼81% -18%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H
416 Points ∼81% -18%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
403 Points ∼78% -21%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Core i7-1065G7
388 Points ∼75% -24%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
358 Points ∼70% -30%
CPU (Multi Core)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
6910 Points ∼100% +55%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
4463 Points ∼65%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
3712 Points ∼54% -17%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
3677 Points ∼53% -18%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20
Intel Core i9-9980HK
3197 Points ∼46% -28%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2924 Points ∼42% -34%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H
2622 Points ∼38% -41%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Core i7-10710U
2598 Points ∼38% -42%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
2333 Points ∼34% -48%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1783 Points ∼26% -60%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1411 Points ∼20% -68%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
215 Points ∼99%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K
212 Points ∼97% -1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
209 Points ∼96% -3%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Intel Core i9-9900K
207 Points ∼95% -4%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
203 Points ∼93% -6%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
192 Points ∼88% -11%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Core i7-10710U
191 Points ∼88% -11%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points ∼87% -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20
Intel Core i9-9980HK
181 Points ∼83% -16%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
171 Points ∼78% -20%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H
171 Points ∼78% -20%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
157 (min: 155, max: 159) Points ∼72% -27%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Core i7-1065G7
149 Points ∼68% -31%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
146 Points ∼67% -32%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
144 Points ∼66% -33%
CPU Multi 64Bit
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
3049 Points ∼70% +55%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Intel Core i9-9900K
1979 Points ∼45% +1%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K
1968 Points ∼45% 0%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
1962 Points ∼45%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points ∼39% -12%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
1617 (min: 1603, max: 1630) Points ∼37% -18%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1408 Points ∼32% -28%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
1359 Points ∼31% -31%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1327 Points ∼30% -32%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H
1288 Points ∼29% -34%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1217 Points ∼28% -38%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
1116 Points ∼26% -43%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Core i7-10710U
1103 Points ∼25% -44%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
730 Points ∼17% -63%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Core i7-1065G7
676 Points ∼15% -66%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
2.43 Points ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
2.36 Points ∼97% -3%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
2.16 Points ∼89% -11%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
2.11 Points ∼86% -13%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H
1.96 Points ∼80% -19%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
1.79 Points ∼73% -26%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.65 Points ∼68% -32%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1.63 Points ∼67% -33%
CPU Multi 64Bit
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
33.44 Points ∼76% +50%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
22.31 Points ∼51%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
18.94 Points ∼43% -15%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
18 (min: 17.98, max: 18.08) Points ∼41% -19%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
15.76 Points ∼36% -29%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
14.98 Points ∼34% -33%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H
14.11 Points ∼32% -37%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.16 Points ∼18% -63%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
8143 Points ∼75%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
7735 Points ∼71% -5%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
7243 Points ∼67% -11%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
6967 Points ∼64% -14%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
6579 Points ∼61% -19%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
5992 Points ∼55% -26%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5568 Points ∼51% -32%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
5062 Points ∼47% -38%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
4286 Points ∼40% -47%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
50462 Points ∼77%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
45047 Points ∼69% -11%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
42456 Points ∼65% -16%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
38810 Points ∼59% -23%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
36591 Points ∼56% -27%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
32846 Points ∼50% -35%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
32833 Points ∼50% -35%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
29330 Points ∼45% -42%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21976 Points ∼34% -56%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
120.923 s * ∼1% -29%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
118.733 s * ∼1% -27%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
104 s * ∼1% -11%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
93.79 s * ∼1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
57.495 s * ∼1% +39%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
677.2 Seconds * ∼3% -63%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
511.147 Seconds * ∼2% -23%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
476.493 Seconds * ∼2% -15%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
465.128 Seconds * ∼2% -12%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
416.054 Seconds * ∼2%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
147 (min: 147, max: 148) fps ∼83% +27%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
116 fps ∼65%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
102.39 fps ∼58% -12%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
81.8 fps ∼46% -29%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
73 fps ∼41% -37%
Pass 1
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
276.16 fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
267.5 (min: 266, max: 268) fps ∼97% -3%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
217 fps ∼79% -21%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
163 fps ∼59% -41%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
160.7 fps ∼58% -42%
WinRAR - Result
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
8156 KB/s ∼96%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
7529 KB/s ∼88% -8%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
6683 KB/s ∼78% -18%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
3814 KB/s ∼45% -53%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
3364 KB/s ∼39% -59%
TrueCrypt
Serpent Mean 100MB
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
1.7 GB/s ∼77% +42%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
1.2 GB/s ∼55%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
0.83 GB/s ∼38% -31%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
0.757 GB/s ∼34% -37%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
0.682 GB/s ∼31% -43%
Twofish Mean 100MB
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
2.9 GB/s ∼78% +38%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
2.1 GB/s ∼57%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
1.5 GB/s ∼41% -29%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1.3 GB/s ∼35% -38%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
1.3 GB/s ∼35% -38%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
0.999 GB/s ∼27% -52%
AES Mean 100MB
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
12.1 GB/s ∼58%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
10.9 GB/s ∼53% -10%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
9.8 GB/s ∼47% -19%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
7.5 GB/s ∼36% -38%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
7.4 GB/s ∼36% -39%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
6 GB/s ∼29% -50%
Geekbench 4.0
Compute OpenCL Score
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
288102 Points ∼99%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
73460 Points ∼25% -75%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
35932 Points ∼100%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
21180 Points ∼59% -41%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
12448 Points ∼35% -65%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
6313 Points ∼100%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
4481 Points ∼71% -29%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
4119 Points ∼65% -35%
Blender 2.79 - ---
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
293 Seconds * ∼3% -20%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
290 Seconds * ∼3% -19%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
244 Seconds * ∼3%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
162.3 Seconds * ∼2% +33%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
82119 MIPS ∼79% +49%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
55064 MIPS ∼53%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
46591 MIPS ∼45% -15%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
5674 MIPS ∼82%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
5533 MIPS ∼80% -2%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
4924 MIPS ∼71% -13%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X
20.9 fps ∼69% +36%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
 
15.315 fps ∼50%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
11.865 fps ∼39% -23%
MSI GL62M 7RD-077
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6.39 fps ∼21% -58%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
15720
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
50462
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
8143
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
99.09 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
22.31 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.43 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
174.67 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1962 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
215 Points
Help

System Performance

Eurocom laptops have some of the highest PCMark scores in our database and the X4C is no different. In fact, it currently has the highest PCMark 10 score at 7511 points compared to 7151 points on the Sky X7C. We experienced no software or hardware issues during our time with the test unit.

PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), , Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
11245 Points ∼94%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
11191 Points ∼93% 0%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)
10929 Points ∼91% -3%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
9239 Points ∼77% -18%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1700, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002
6266 Points ∼52% -44%
Productivity
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), , Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
9077 Points ∼94%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
8702 Points ∼90% -4%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)
8416 Points ∼87% -7%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
8068 Points ∼83% -11%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1700, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002
6811 Points ∼70% -25%
Essentials
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), , Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
11266 Points ∼100%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
10466 Points ∼93% -7%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
10275 Points ∼91% -9%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)
10150 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1700, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002
8360 Points ∼74% -26%
Score
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), , Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
7511 Points ∼97%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
7171 Points ∼92% -5%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)
7006 Points ∼90% -7%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
6599 Points ∼85% -12%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1700, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002
5084 Points ∼65% -32%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), , Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
6464 Points ∼99%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
6352 Points ∼97% -2%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)
6140 Points ∼94% -5%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1700, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002
5110 Points ∼78% -21%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), , Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
5744 Points ∼94%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
5610 Points ∼92% -2%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)
5607 Points ∼92% -2%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1700, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002
4173 Points ∼68% -27%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5744 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6464 points
Help

Storage Devices

A total of four internal storage bays (2x M.2 2280 + 2x 2.5-inch SATA III) are available. Our test unit comes with the NVMe Samsung SSD 970 Pro compared to the NVMe Samsung SSD 960 Pro on our 2018 Sky X4C for faster read performances.

See our table of HDDs and SSDs for more benchmark comparisons.

CDM 5.5
CDM 5.5
AS SSD
AS SSD
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
CUK Cyclone 500GB M.2 NVMe
Eurocom Sky X4C
Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe
AS SSD
-64%
-54%
-50%
-8%
3%
Copy Game MB/s
1755.68
755.35
-57%
650.44
-63%
1054.98
-40%
Copy Program MB/s
731.4
452.76
-38%
426.02
-42%
467.16
-36%
Copy ISO MB/s
3006.73
1269.47
-58%
1061.83
-65%
1908.08
-37%
Score Total
4811
930
-81%
1332
-72%
1065
-78%
3040
-37%
4615
-4%
Score Write
2471
293
-88%
586
-76%
366
-85%
902
-63%
1703
-31%
Score Read
1552
420
-73%
489
-68%
475
-69%
1433
-8%
1945
25%
Access Time Write *
0.098
0.045
54%
0.046
53%
0.037
62%
0.042
57%
0.03
69%
Access Time Read *
0.078
0.168
-115%
0.24
-208%
0.132
-69%
0.05
36%
0.032
59%
4K-64 Write
2123.99
170.58
-92%
403.79
-81%
191.35
-91%
647.89
-69%
1374.74
-35%
4K-64 Read
1292.69
350.3
-73%
323.8
-75%
302.13
-77%
1144.38
-11%
1645.75
27%
4K Write
127.3
77.33
-39%
90.1
-29%
99.89
-22%
87.67
-31%
129.64
2%
4K Read
31.67
19.55
-38%
48.88
54%
35.42
12%
49.17
55%
44.83
42%
Seq Write
2198.09
446.99
-80%
919
-58%
746
-66%
1664.55
-24%
1988.74
-10%
Seq Read
2279.76
505.83
-78%
1163
-49%
1372
-40%
2399.1
5%
2541.23
11%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3559 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2334 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 570.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 490.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1891 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1836 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 63.46 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 188.8 MB/s

GPU Performance

At stock, the GeForce RTX 2080 in our Eurocom is about 6 to 8 percent slower than the same GPU in the overclocked Dell Alienware Area-51m. A "proper" desktop RTX 2080 can offer about 8 to 15 percent faster performance than our Eurocom GPU.

See our dedicated page on the mobile GeForce RTX 2080 for more technical information and benchmark comparisons. Nvidia is expected to launch mobile Super options for laptops in 2020.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Time Spy
Time Spy
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
Port Royal
Port Royal
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 3900X
8537 Points ∼100% +47%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super, 2700X
6745 Points ∼79% +16%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
5852 Points ∼69% +1%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop),
5799 Points ∼68%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (5377 - 5942, n=13)
5649 Points ∼66% -3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
5295 Points ∼62% -9%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
4467 Points ∼52% -23%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
3738 Points ∼44% -36%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
3193 Points ∼37% -45%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 3900X
13744 Points ∼94% +39%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super, 2700X
11477 Points ∼78% +16%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X
11294 Points ∼77% +15%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
10720 Points ∼73% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (9480 - 10992, n=13)
10087 Points ∼69% +2%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop),
9854 Points ∼67%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
8299 Points ∼57% -16%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
7732 Points ∼53% -22%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
7722 Points ∼53% -22%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
6387 Points ∼44% -35%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
5660 Points ∼39% -43%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 3900X
32081 Points ∼79% +26%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X
27620 Points ∼68% +8%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
27080 Points ∼67% +6%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super, 2700X
27075 Points ∼67% +6%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop),
25497 Points ∼63%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (22820 - 27319, n=14)
25348 Points ∼62% -1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
22260 Points ∼55% -13%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
19846 Points ∼49% -22%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
19338 Points ∼48% -24%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
17419 Points ∼43% -32%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
15398 Points ∼38% -40%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
161161 Points ∼87% +3%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 3900X
157746 Points ∼85% +1%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop),
155800 Points ∼84%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X
138058 Points ∼75% -11%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super, 2700X
137520 Points ∼75% -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (72806 - 168006, n=14)
135517 Points ∼73% -13%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
119860 Points ∼65% -23%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
118058 Points ∼64% -24%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
114009 Points ∼62% -27%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
107083 Points ∼58% -31%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
101947 Points ∼55% -35%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 3900X
383142 Points ∼53%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X
322455 Points ∼44%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
305160 Points ∼42%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super, 2700X
276319 Points ∼38%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
 
164011 Points ∼22%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
150368 Points ∼21%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop),
18934 Points ∼84%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 3900X
18340 Points ∼81% -3%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
17290 Points ∼76% -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (9038 - 18934, n=15)
14411 Points ∼64% -24%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
13742 Points ∼61% -27%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X
13644 Points ∼60% -28%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super, 2700X
13548 Points ∼60% -28%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
12323 Points ∼55% -35%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
12064 Points ∼53% -36%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
11610 Points ∼51% -39%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
10851 Points ∼48% -43%
1280x720 Performance GPU
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 3900X
45050 Points ∼88% +29%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
38485 Points ∼75% +10%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X
37989 Points ∼75% +9%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super, 2700X
37958 Points ∼74% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (31826 - 38809, n=15)
35474 Points ∼70% +2%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop),
34846 Points ∼68%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
29436 Points ∼58% -16%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
26413 Points ∼52% -24%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
25500 Points ∼50% -27%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
21861 Points ∼43% -37%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
19513 Points ∼38% -44%
3DMark 06 Standard
47829 points
3DMark 11 Performance
28993 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
60073 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
22556 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
10012 points
Help
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX
Ryzen 9 3900X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
130 fps ∼100% +5%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
124 fps ∼95%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
123 fps ∼95% -1%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
110 fps ∼85% -11%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
110 fps ∼85% -11%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
109 fps ∼84% -12%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
105 fps ∼81% -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (69 - 124, n=7)
103 fps ∼79% -17%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
91 fps ∼70% -27%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
90 fps ∼69% -27%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
87 fps ∼67% -30%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
81 fps ∼62% -35%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
80 fps ∼62% -35%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
73 fps ∼56% -41%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Core i7-10710U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
35 fps ∼27% -72%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX
Ryzen 9 3900X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
135 (min: 118, max: 158) fps ∼100% +41%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
109 (min: 94, max: 120) fps ∼81% +14%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
109 (min: 81, max: 123) fps ∼81% +14%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
101.1 fps ∼75% +6%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
100 fps ∼74% +5%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
95.5 fps ∼71%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
  (82.2 - 105, n=14)
95.4 fps ∼71% 0%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
95.3 fps ∼71% 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
92.7 fps ∼69% -3%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
90.3 fps ∼67% -5%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
81.3 fps ∼60% -15%
Schenker Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
77.4 fps ∼57% -19%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Ryzen 9 3900X, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
76 (min: 67, max: 84) fps ∼56% -20%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
75.3 fps ∼56% -21%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
72.7 (min: 61, max: 82) fps ∼54% -24%
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
72 fps ∼53% -25%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
72 (min: 61, max: 84) fps ∼53% -25%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
63.6 fps ∼47% -33%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
62.2 fps ∼46% -35%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
60.5 fps ∼45% -37%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
60.4 (min: 49) fps ∼45% -37%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
60 fps ∼44% -37%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
56.9 (min: 48) fps ∼42% -40%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700, AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
37.4 (min: 31) fps ∼28% -61%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Intel Core i7-10710U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
30.8 fps ∼23% -68%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
9.6 fps ∼7% -90%
0102030405060708090100