Notebookcheck

Eurocom Tornado F7W (i9-9900K, Quadro P5200) Workstation Review

Core i9-9900K and Quadro P5200 in one laptop. For about $5000+ USD, professional users can get what is essentially a high-end desktop wrapped in a 17.3-inch chassis. Performance is indubitably fast, but not as fast as it could have been in regards to the CPU.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Currently wanted: 
News Editor - Details here

(Source: Eurocom)
(Source: Eurocom)

The Eurocom Tornado F7W mobile workstation is the 17.3-inch version of the 15.6-inch Tornado F5W we checked out late last year. Like most Eurocom laptops, the F7W is packed to the brim with the latest hardware features and a wide array of options. Users can choose to go simple with a "basic" Core i7-8700 CPU, Quadro P3000 GPU, and a 120 Hz FHD display or go all out for the Core i9-9900K, Quadro P5200 GPU, and 4K UHS option. RAM can be configured up to 128 GB across four SODIMM slots as initially promised by the reseller. Xeon processors and ECC RAM are also available for added performance stability. We recommend checking out the product page here for the full list of customizable features.

Our test unit today is a high-end configuration retailing for about $7000 USD. Much of the price markup can be attributed to the 3x Samsung SSD 970 PRO SSDs and 64 GB of DDR4 RAM on our unit, so it's possible to get the system for much less by dialing down the storage and RAM. Competitors in the 17.3-inch workstation category include the Dell Precision 7720, Lenovo ThinkPad P71/P72, and the HP ZBook 17 series. Unlike these alternatives, however, the Eurocom is more powerful, serviceable, and upgradeable all in one.

More Eurocom reviews:

Eurocom Tornado F7W
Processor
Intel Core i9-9900K
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 - 16384 MB, Core: 1582 MHz, Memory: 7214 MHz, GDDR5, 411.95
Memory
65536 MB 
, 1333.3 MHz, 15-17-27-32, Dual-Channel
Display
17.3 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, AUO109B, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel C246 (Cannon Lake-H)
Soundcard
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
5 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Mic in; Headphone S/PDIF out; Line-in; Line out, Card Reader: SD reader, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 51 x 428 x 314 ( = 2.01 x 16.85 x 12.36 in)
Battery
90 Wh, 6250 mAh Lithium-Ion, 8-cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2 MP
Additional features
Speakers: 2 W stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
4.2 kg ( = 148.15 oz / 9.26 pounds), Power Supply: 1.9 kg ( = 67.02 oz / 4.19 pounds)
Price
8000 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case

The Tornado F7W is a very large 17.3-inch laptop even by Eurocom standards. The Sky X9C with its GeForce GTX 1080 SLI graphics somehow manages to be smaller than the F7W. It's a thick laptop with dimensions close to that of the Asus ROG G703 but still smaller than the MSI GT75VR. To Eurocom's credit, the system is at least lighter than these aforementioned gaming laptops by several hundred grams.

The design and quality of the chassis are what we've come to expect from Eurocom and Clevo systems. Thus, many of our existing comments on previous Eurocom systems still apply here. The base is rigid with almost no creaking and the new oversized hinges are an improvement over the small hinges of most MSI laptops. We still believe the lid could be stiffer as it feels more flexible than the lids of the Alienware 17, Razer Blade Pro, and the narrow-bezel Asus ROG GL704.

Connectivity

The system carries a wide selection of ports. While the USB Type-A ports are easy enough to reach, the rear ports are more difficult since they are tucked between the protruding ventilation grilles. The competing MSI GT75VR has a 10 Gbps Ethernet port compared to the 1 Gbps port on our Eurocom and, perhaps annoyingly, the HDMI port here is upside-down.

Right: Smartcard reader, 2x USB 3.1, SD reader, Kensington Lock
Right: Smartcard reader, 2x USB 3.1, SD reader, Kensington Lock
Rear: Gigabit RJ-45, mini DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0, AC adapter
Rear: Gigabit RJ-45, mini DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0, AC adapter
Left: 3x USB 3.1, Mic in, Headphone S/PDIF out, Line-in, Line out
Left: 3x USB 3.1, Mic in, Headphone S/PDIF out, Line-in, Line out

SD Card Reader

Independent journalism is made possible by advertising. We show the least amount of ads whenever possible but we intentionally show more ads when an adblocker is used. Please, switch off ad blockers and support us!

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus Chimera G703GI
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198 MB/s ∼100% +6%
Eurocom Sky X7C
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194.3 MB/s ∼98% +4%
Eurocom Sky X9C
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
191.05 MB/s ∼96% +2%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
186.9 MB/s ∼94%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
73.04 MB/s ∼37% -61%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus Chimera G703GI
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
246 MB/s ∼100% +23%
Eurocom Sky X7C
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
209.48 MB/s ∼85% +5%
Eurocom Sky X9C
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
207.93 MB/s ∼85% +4%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
200 MB/s ∼81%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.35 MB/s ∼36% -56%

Communication

The Intel 9260 is capable of theoretical transfer rates of up to 1.73 Gbps and it is becoming increasingly common on newer Ultrabooks. Our server setup is limited by a 1 Gbps line and so the numbers below are slower than what the Intel 9260 is capable of.

Transmit rates are unusually slow while receive rates appear to be normal to indicate a potential bug or faulty antenna on our specific test unit.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
681 MBit/s ∼100% +14%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
670 MBit/s ∼98% +12%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
668 MBit/s ∼98% +12%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
637 MBit/s ∼94% +6%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
599 MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
690 MBit/s ∼100% +731%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
679 MBit/s ∼98% +718%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
640 MBit/s ∼93% +671%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
594 MBit/s ∼86% +616%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
83 MBit/s ∼12%

Maintenance

The bottom panel requires only a Philips screwdriver to remove. Users have direct access to most key components including the LGA 1151 socket, MXM 3.1 slot, battery, two SODIMM slots, and all four storage bays. Note that the M.2 WLAN module is inconveniently underneath some heat pipes while the other two SODIMM slots require additional disassembly.

(Source: Eurocom)
(Source: Eurocom)

Warranty

The standard one-year limited warranty applies with options to extend up to two or three years. We're hopeful that the base warranty will be upped to two years in the near future to match the base warranties of HP business products and the Aorus series of laptops.

Input Devices

Keyboard and Touchpad

Eurocom keyboards are consistent across nearly all models and it's no different here on the Tornado F7W. Feedback is satisfactorily firm and uniform across the main QWERTY keys. Clatter is also quieter than most notebooks due to the rigid deck and heavy chassis underneath. Our main complaints are the lack of per-key RGB lighting and the reduced size of the NumPad keys. While we can forgive the former, the latter is a slight annoyance since there is space for a full-size NumPad. Inputting numbers can feel a little cramped as a result.

The medium-sized (11.0 x 6.5 cm) trackpad is one of the best we've seen on a 17-inch laptop. It's firm, does not warp to pressure, and it feels smooth with almost no sticking when gliding across slowly. The large dedicated mouse keys are shallow in travel with a loud and satisfying click when pressed. An external mouse is still easier and less straining for longer tasks.

The trackpad perimeter lights up along with the rest of the keyboard. The right column of 4 auxiliary keys includes a (non-functioning) GPU toggle, Turbo Fan, and two customizeable shortcuts
The trackpad perimeter lights up along with the rest of the keyboard. The right column of 4 auxiliary keys includes a (non-functioning) GPU toggle, Turbo Fan, and two customizeable shortcuts

Display

Perhaps unsurprisingly, our Tornado F7W utilizes the same AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 IPS panel as found on the Sky X7C and Sky X9C. Innate characteristics like response times, color coverage, and contrast are thus nearly the same between these laptops. This particular AUO panel is relatively common on enthusiast 17-inch laptops like the MSI GT73VR or Acer Predator 17.

Strengths of the AUO panel include its 4K UHD native resolution, very wide gamut for deep colors, and faster response times than the competing Sharp LQ173D1JW33 IGZO panel. Even so, response times are still not fast enough for hardcore gaming and contrast ratio is "only" about 900:1 compared to ~1300:1 on the 4K UHD panel of the Dell XPS 15.

The matte panel of the Tornado F7W suffers from a slight layer of graininess that is otherwise not present on glossy displays. The difference is noticeable when viewing text with no scaling enabled as the letters do not look at crisp or sharp as they could be. There is slight uneven backlight bleeding on the bottom left corner of our screen as shown in the screenshot below.

Slight bleeding near bottom left corner
Slight bleeding near bottom left corner
Subpixel array (255 PPI). Note the grainy overlay over the pixels
Subpixel array (255 PPI). Note the grainy overlay over the pixels
306.2
cd/m²
315.2
cd/m²
314.4
cd/m²
307.3
cd/m²
328.2
cd/m²
317.1
cd/m²
301.5
cd/m²
303.6
cd/m²
300.9
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 328.2 cd/m² Average: 310.5 cd/m² Minimum: 16.41 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 328.2 cd/m²
Contrast: 887:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.62 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 3.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 87.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
Eurocom Tornado F7W
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
Eurocom Sky X7C
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
Asus Chimera G703GI
B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
AU Optronics B173HW01, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Eurocom Sky X9C
ID: AUO109B, Name: AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 17.3, 1920x1080
Response Times
10%
75%
-5%
0%
81%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 (18.8, 21.2)
38.4 (18, 20.4)
4%
6.4 (3.4, 3)
84%
44 (22, 22)
-10%
43.6 (24, 19.6)
-9%
8 (4.4, 3.6)
80%
Response Time Black / White *
31.6 (18, 13.6)
26.8 (15.6, 11.2)
15%
10.8 (6, 4.8)
66%
31.6 (16, 15.6)
-0%
28.8 (17.2, 11.6)
9%
5.6 (3.8, 1.8)
82%
PWM Frequency
26000 (19)
Screen
1%
19%
15%
2%
22%
Brightness middle
328.2
333
1%
285
-13%
343
5%
347.7
6%
240
-27%
Brightness
310
330
6%
275
-11%
332
7%
324
5%
248
-20%
Brightness Distribution
92
88
-4%
82
-11%
83
-10%
87
-5%
83
-10%
Black Level *
0.37
0.4
-8%
0.22
41%
0.35
5%
0.4
-8%
0.22
41%
Contrast
887
833
-6%
1295
46%
980
10%
869
-2%
1091
23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.62
5.87
11%
3.18
52%
3.35
49%
6.39
3%
2.14
68%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.49
9.74
-3%
5.99
37%
5.62
41%
9.69
-2%
5.04
47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.93
4.59
-17%
1.73
56%
2.5
36%
1.54
61%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.7
4.5
33%
2.93
56%
2.4
64%
5.4
19%
1.62
76%
Gamma
2.44 90%
2.34 94%
2.45 90%
2.35 94%
2.4 92%
2.28 96%
CCT
6462 101%
6384 102%
7165 91%
6495 100%
6271 104%
6846 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
87.9
88
0%
60
-32%
57
-35%
87.8
0%
77
-12%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
100
0%
93
-7%
88
-12%
100
0%
100
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
6% / 2%
47% / 28%
5% / 12%
1% / 1%
52% / 31%

* ... smaller is better

Color space covers sRGB and nearly all of AdobeRGB not unlike on the Sky X7C or Sky X9C. This is a panel fit for professional use where accurate colors take priority over fast response times and refresh rates.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Colors and grayscale are average out of the box against the AdobeRGB standard with grays appearing a bit too red. Our calibration attempt addresses this for a more accurate display overall as shown by our CalMAN results below. A calibration is recommended to get the most out of the high quality panel.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 13.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8931 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Outdoor visibility is not unlike most other gaming laptops. The matte panel helps to reduce glare, but the backlight is not powerful enough to overcome ambient lighting conditions. Remain under shade if outdoor use is unavoidable.

Outdoors on cloudy day
Outdoors on cloudy day
Outdoors on cloudy day
Outdoors on cloudy day
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Wide IPS viewing angles
Wide IPS viewing angles

Performance

Processor

The Core i9-9900K in our Eurocom laptop is approximately 16 to 25 percent slower than the same CPU in our "proper" desktop PC according to CineBench R15 Multi-Thread. Even the Schenker XMG Ultra 17 with the same CPU is able to run faster than our Eurocom as shown by our CineBench R15 loop test below. Activating Turbo Fan mode on our Eurocom does not appear to boost clock rates or performance.

Users upgrading from the Core i7-8700K in the Eurocom Sky X7C will see a 22 percent boost in multi-thread performance.

See our full review on the Core i9-9900K for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.

CineBench R10 32-bit
CineBench R10 32-bit
CineBench R11.5 64-bit
CineBench R11.5 64-bit
CineBench R15
CineBench R15
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610162016301640165016601670168016901700171017201730174017501760177017801790180018101820183018401850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970Tooltip
Eurocom Tornado F7W Quadro P5200, 9900K; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1615 (1590.08-1643.59)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1747 (1697.29-1865)
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 RX Vega 64, 9900K; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1944 (1919.48-1969.76)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
214 Points ∼98%
Average Intel Core i9-9900K
  (209 - 218, n=4)
214 Points ∼98% 0%
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Intel Core i9-9900K
213 Points ∼98% 0%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
207 Points ∼95% -3%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
205 Points ∼94% -4%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
190 Points ∼87% -11%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
190 Points ∼87% -11%
Eurocom Q6
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points ∼78% -21%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
163 Points ∼75% -24%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
156 Points ∼72% -27%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
144 Points ∼66% -33%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Intel Core i9-9900K
2040 Points ∼47% +26%
Average Intel Core i9-9900K
  (1623 - 2040, n=4)
1887 Points ∼43% +16%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
1623 Points ∼37%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1408 Points ∼32% -13%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
1408 Points ∼32% -13%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1378 Points ∼31% -15%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
1334 Points ∼30% -18%
Eurocom Q6
Intel Core i7-8750H
1050 Points ∼24% -35%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
897 Points ∼20% -45%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
815 Points ∼19% -50%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
772 Points ∼18% -52%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Intel Core i9-9900K
2.44 Points ∼100% 0%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
2.43 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-9900K
  (2.38 - 2.44, n=3)
2.42 Points ∼99% 0%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.33 Points ∼95% -4%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
2.23 Points ∼91% -8%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
2.2 Points ∼90% -9%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
2.19 Points ∼90% -10%
Eurocom Q6
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.95 Points ∼80% -20%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
1.92 Points ∼79% -21%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.84 Points ∼75% -24%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1.63 Points ∼67% -33%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Intel Core i9-9900K
21.63 Points ∼80% +25%
Average Intel Core i9-9900K
  (17.4 - 21.6, n=3)
20.1 Points ∼74% +16%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
17.37 Points ∼64%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
15.76 Points ∼58% -9%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
15.41 Points ∼57% -11%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.05 Points ∼56% -13%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
15.02 Points ∼55% -14%
Eurocom Q6
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.62 Points ∼43% -33%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
9.78 Points ∼36% -44%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
8.91 Points ∼33% -49%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.44 Points ∼31% -51%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
8042 Points ∼74%
Average Intel Core i9-9900K
  (7832 - 8042, n=3)
7969 Points ∼74% -1%
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Intel Core i9-9900K
7832 Points ∼72% -3%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
7423 Points ∼69% -8%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
7222 Points ∼67% -10%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
6541 Points ∼60% -19%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
6182 Points ∼57% -23%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
4286 Points ∼40% -47%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Intel Core i9-9900K
48749 Points ∼98% +33%
Average Intel Core i9-9900K
  (36683 - 48808, n=3)
44747 Points ∼90% +22%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
39382 Points ∼79% +7%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
36683 Points ∼74%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
33064 Points ∼66% -10%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
29330 Points ∼59% -20%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
28189 Points ∼57% -23%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
23041 Points ∼46% -37%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
299 s * ∼4% -203%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
213.193 s * ∼3% -116%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
176.329 s * ∼2% -79%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
119.722 s * ∼1% -21%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
116.591 s * ∼1% -18%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
98.728 s * ∼1%
Average Intel Core i9-9900K
  (85.6 - 98.7, n=2)
92.1 s * ∼1% +7%
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Intel Core i9-9900K
85.558 s * ∼1% +13%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Average Intel Core i9-9900K
  (7.55 - 14409, n=14)
4755 Seconds * ∼21% -1009%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
677.2 Seconds * ∼3% -58%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
535.159 Seconds * ∼2% -25%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
527 Seconds * ∼2% -23%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
503.822 Seconds * ∼2% -18%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
452.938 Seconds * ∼2% -6%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
440.036 Seconds * ∼2% -3%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
428.686 Seconds * ∼2%
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Intel Core i9-9900K
413.791 Seconds * ∼2% +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6836
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
36683
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
8042
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
170.52 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
17.37 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.43 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
249.64 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1623 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
214 Points
Help

System Performance

PCMark benchmarks rank our Eurocom just slightly below the Sky X9C and other high-performance laptops with the GTX 1080 GPU. Results are still about 10 to 20 percent better than the Tornado F5W with Quadro P5000 graphics. We didn't experience any software or hardware hiccups during our time with the test unit.

Strangely, our system refuses to enter BIOS during boot up. The first few attempts resulted in errors before ignoring our key inputs entirely.

PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
9940 Points ∼100% +22%
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
8836 Points ∼89% +9%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
8786 Points ∼88% +8%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
8732 Points ∼88% +8%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Quadro P5200, 9900K
8122 Points ∼82%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
6889 Points ∼69% -15%
Average of class Workstation
  (2466 - 8122, n=25)
4879 Points ∼49% -40%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512
4765 Points ∼48% -41%
Productivity
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
8968 Points ∼93% +8%
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
8877 Points ∼92% +7%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
8657 Points ∼89% +4%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
8625 Points ∼89% +4%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Quadro P5200, 9900K
8307 Points ∼86%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
7236 Points ∼75% -13%
Average of class Workstation
  (4897 - 8307, n=25)
6958 Points ∼72% -16%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512
5828 Points ∼60% -30%
Essentials
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
10668 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
9982 Points ∼94% +1%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Quadro P5200, 9900K
9847 Points ∼92%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
9776 Points ∼92% -1%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
9775 Points ∼92% -1%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512
9366 Points ∼88% -5%
Average of class Workstation
  (7172 - 9847, n=25)
8382 Points ∼79% -15%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
8293 Points ∼78% -16%
Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
6959 Points ∼90% +11%
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
6607 Points ∼85% +6%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
6558 Points ∼84% +5%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
6495 Points ∼84% +4%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Quadro P5200, 9900K
6255 Points ∼81%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
5340 Points ∼69% -15%
Average of class Workstation
  (3281 - 6255, n=25)
4649 Points ∼60% -26%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512
4576 Points ∼59% -27%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
6093 Points ∼100% +19%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5720 Points ∼94% +12%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
5273 Points ∼87% +3%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
5243 Points ∼86% +2%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Quadro P5200, 9900K
5130 Points ∼84%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
5005 Points ∼82% -2%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512
4882 Points ∼80% -5%
Average of class Workstation
  (2320 - 5505, n=63)
3939 Points ∼65% -23%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5130 points
Help

Storage Devices

All four bays side by side. Not shown: a metal plate cover for the three M.2 drives
All four bays side by side. Not shown: a metal plate cover for the three M.2 drives

Our test unit is equipped with 3x 512 GB Samsung SSD 970 PRO in RAID 0. Sequential read and write rates are unsurprisingly speedy, but they are only marginally better than 2x Samsung PM961 SSDs in RAID 0. Having two Intel SSD 760p SSDs in RAID 0 alongside a single Samsung SM961, like on our Asus Chimera G703GI configuration, is the way to go if extremely high storage performance is desired.

See our table of HDDs and SSDs for more benchmark comparisons.

AS SSD
AS SSD
CDM 5.5
CDM 5.5
Eurocom Tornado F7W
 
Eurocom Sky X7C
2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
Asus Chimera G703GI
2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
Eurocom Tornado F5
Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
AS SSD
11%
43%
3%
11%
Copy Game MB/s
1585.11
1321.19
-17%
1310.15
-17%
Copy Program MB/s
621.34
518.41
-17%
634.94
2%
Copy ISO MB/s
2320.07
2330.48
0%
1614.11
-30%
Score Total
3928
4184
7%
4843
23%
4066
4%
3943
0%
Score Write
1583
1606
1%
1855
17%
1553
-2%
1689
7%
Score Read
1543
1712
11%
1999
30%
1691
10%
1512
-2%
Access Time Write *
0.033
0.032
3%
0.026
21%
0.038
-15%
0.024
27%
Access Time Read *
0.045
0.034
24%
0.03
33%
0.056
-24%
0.03
33%
4K-64 Write
1236.25
1202.93
-3%
1302.78
5%
1235.98
0%
1333.91
8%
4K-64 Read
1299.13
1348.21
4%
1452.88
12%
1346.92
4%
1178.67
-9%
4K Write
102.54
116.69
14%
141.26
38%
97.68
-5%
150.46
47%
4K Read
29.7
48.74
64%
57.4
93%
38.37
29%
50.96
72%
Seq Write
2446.83
2865.87
17%
4110.47
68%
2196.29
-10%
2046.28
-16%
Seq Read
2139.33
3146.5
47%
4885.76
128%
3058.28
43%
2819.05
32%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
11%
44%
-11%
Write 4K
116.3
152.2
31%
130.2
12%
111.8
-4%
Read 4K
52.65
60.4
15%
57.33
9%
42.09
-20%
Write Seq
2539
3002
18%
4049
59%
2288
-10%
Read Seq
2972
3329
12%
5325
79%
3321
12%
Write 4K Q32T1
454.6
432.9
-5%
383.2
-16%
308.3
-32%
Read 4K Q32T1
515.1
494
-4%
424.9
-18%
364.9
-29%
Write Seq Q32T1
3101
3391
9%
4316
39%
2440
-21%
Read Seq Q32T1
3078
3405
11%
8905
189%
3485
13%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
11% / 11%
44% / 43%
-4% / -3%
11% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3078 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3101 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 515.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 454.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2972 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2539 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 52.65 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 116.3 MB/s

GPU Performance

The Quadro P5200 is about 20 to 25 percent faster than the Quadro P5000 according to 3DMark benchmarks. SpecViewPerf scores are as good as or better than the Sky X9C with GTX 1080 SLI graphics since the P5200 is better optimized for CAD use and is equipped with twice the GDDR5 VRAM (16 GB vs. 8 GB).

Gaming performance is respectable even at native 4K resolution. It may not be the most cost-efficient way to play games, but performance is essentially between the GTX 1070 and GTX 1080. Idling on Witcher 3 shows no drops in frame rates over time to represent stable gaming load performance and no interrupting background activity.

The 1080p (16:9) option was grayed out on all games and so we used the 1200p (16:10) option instead. Furthermore, Destiny 2 was the only title we tested that was unable to run at full speed on our Quadro GPU.

Ice Storm
Ice Storm
3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Unigine Heaven 4.0
Unigine Heaven 4.0
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Time Spy
Time Spy
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
16418 Points ∼91%
Eurocom Sky X7C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8086K
14228 Points ∼78% -13%
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
14119 Points ∼78% -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
10960 Points ∼60% -33%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
10778 Points ∼59% -34%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
10428 Points ∼58% -36%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, 7700HQ
9296 Points ∼51% -43%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, 8706G
8166 Points ∼45% -50%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
8059 Points ∼44% -51%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
46773 Points ∼92% +88%
Eurocom Sky X7C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8086K
27275 Points ∼53% +9%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
24934 Points ∼49%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
20623 Points ∼40% -17%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
19569 Points ∼38% -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
17021 Points ∼33% -32%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, 7700HQ
15837 Points ∼31% -36%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, 8706G
10020 Points ∼20% -60%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
8201 Points ∼16% -67%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
6390 Points ∼49%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
4378 Points ∼34% -31%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
2898 Points ∼22% -55%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, 8706G
2062 Points ∼16% -68%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
2046 Points ∼16% -68%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
40582 Points ∼100% +121%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
18390 Points ∼45%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
14990 Points ∼37% -18%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
14666 Points ∼36% -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
12555 Points ∼31% -32%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, 7700HQ
12312 Points ∼30% -33%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, 8706G
7333 Points ∼18% -60%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
6741 Points ∼17% -63%
SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
212 fps ∼100%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
166.24 fps ∼78% -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
148.39 fps ∼70% -30%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
142.34 fps ∼67% -33%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, 7700HQ
119.9 fps ∼57% -43%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
103.79 fps ∼49% -51%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, 8706G
75.15 fps ∼35% -65%
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
66.12 fps ∼31% -69%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
217.93 fps ∼100%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
183.65 fps ∼84% -16%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
157.44 fps ∼72% -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
130.1 fps ∼60% -40%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, 7700HQ
111.7 fps ∼51% -49%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
65.85 fps ∼30% -70%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, 8706G
59.96 fps ∼28% -72%
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
14.98 fps ∼7% -93%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
101.04 fps ∼65% +35%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
74.96 fps ∼48%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
68.76 fps ∼44% -8%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, 7700HQ
62.6 fps ∼40% -16%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
62.33 fps ∼40% -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
58.52 fps ∼38% -22%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, 8706G
38.31 fps ∼25% -49%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
30.73 fps ∼20% -59%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
79.43 fps ∼100%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
71.53 fps ∼90% -10%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
62.74 fps ∼79% -21%
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
48.93 fps ∼62% -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
47.28 fps ∼60% -40%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, 7700HQ
41.8 fps ∼53% -47%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
22.84 fps ∼29% -71%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, 8706G
19.94 fps ∼25% -75%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
160.06 fps ∼82% +8%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
147.92 fps ∼76%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
102.08 fps ∼52% -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
92.73 fps ∼48% -37%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
88.79 fps ∼46% -40%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, 7700HQ
73 fps ∼38% -51%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
59.21 fps ∼30% -60%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, 8706G
42.84 fps ∼22% -71%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
16.88 fps ∼71%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
14.95 fps ∼63% -11%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
14.22 fps ∼60% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
10.61 fps ∼45% -37%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, 7700HQ
10.6 fps ∼45% -37%
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
8.9 fps ∼38% -47%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
5.27 fps ∼22% -69%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, 8706G
2.94 fps ∼12% -83%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
159.99 fps ∼100%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
126.57 fps ∼79% -21%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
117.15 fps ∼73% -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
112.57 fps ∼70% -30%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, 7700HQ
91.9 fps ∼57% -43%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
64.99 fps ∼41% -59%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, 8706G
57.43 fps ∼36% -64%
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
57.21 fps ∼36% -64%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
196.6 fps ∼100%
Eurocom Tornado F5W
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1280 v5
155.37 fps ∼79% -21%
Dell Precision 7720
NVIDIA Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6
139.86 fps ∼71% -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
126.84 fps ∼65% -35%
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q, 7700HQ
110 fps ∼56% -44%
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
79.93 fps ∼41% -59%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M
NVIDIA Quadro P2000, E-2176M
69.61 fps ∼35% -65%
Dell Precision 5530 2-in-1
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL, 8706G
64.39 fps ∼33% -67%
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
189.22 fps ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
133.5 fps ∼71% -29%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
396.3 fps ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
238.9 fps ∼60% -40%
Creo (showcase-02)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
74.67 fps ∼67%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
58.4 fps ∼53% -22%
Medical (medical-02)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
61.7 fps ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
29.9 fps ∼48% -52%
Maya (maya-05)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
255.04 fps ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
163.9 fps ∼64% -36%
Energy (energy-02)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
17.28 fps ∼75%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
8.41 fps ∼37% -51%
Creo (creo-02)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
247.66 fps ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
165.3 fps ∼67% -33%
Catia (catia-05)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
302.43 fps ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
200.5 fps ∼66% -34%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, 9900K
149.6 fps ∼89%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, 8850H
105.9 fps ∼63% -29%
3DMark 06 Standard
44390 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
65844 points
3DMark 11 Performance
22226 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
185544 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
47810 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16723 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
6713 points
Help
010203040506070