Notebookcheck

Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Tongfang GK5CQ7Z) Laptop Review: A gaming laptop with slim bezels

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Felicitas Krohn (translated by Alex Alderson), 11/27/2019

A Clevo alternative. When it comes to configurable high-end laptops, barebone-maker Clevo has long been the industry's top dog. Tongfang has been challenging its dominance for a while now, so we have taken the GK5CQ7Z chassis for a spin once again to see how it fares. Read on to find out how the XMG Neo 15 with its 9th generation Intel processor and RTX 20 series GPU performs in our tests.

Schenker XMG Neo 15

As we already know from past XMG Neo reviews, Schenker gives people a range of components from which to configure their laptops. While the company has since upgraded the XMG Neo 15 to an Intel Core i7-9750H processor across the board, the company also offers the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, GeForce RTX 2060 or GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q as GPU options. Meanwhile, Schenker equips the device with a matte, 1080p and IPS panel that has a 144 Hz refresh rate. The XMG Neo 15 can be configured with 8 GB to 64 GB of DDR4 RAM across two SO-DIMM slots, while there is space for two M.2 SSDs too. Schenker also offers different Wi-Fi modules, keyboard languages and Operating Systems.

The XMG Neo 15 starts at 1,349 Euros (~$1,485). Meanwhile, the XNE15M19 that we have in for review currently costs 2,270 Euros (~$2,500). Schenker equips the device with a Core i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 32 GB of RAM, a 1 TB SSD and Windows 10 Home 64-bit, for reference.

Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 (XMG Neo 15 Series)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 885 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 441.12, Optimus
Memory
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel. All slots occupied, maximum of 64 GB
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM370
Storage
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001, 1024 GB 
, NVMe, two M.2-2280 drive bays
Soundcard
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Dedicated headphone and microphone jacks, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Networking
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 22 x 359 x 243 ( = 0.87 x 14.13 x 9.57 in)
Battery
62 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: RGB, mechanical, Keyboard Light: yes, 230 W power supply, Control Center, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.056 kg ( = 72.52 oz / 4.53 pounds), Power Supply: 690 g ( = 24.34 oz / 1.52 pounds)
Price
2268 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Especially English native speakers welcome!

Currently wanted: 
News and Editorial Editor - Details here

We will compare the XMG Neo 15 against other comparably equipped gaming laptops like the Acer Predator Triton 500, Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XAHP Omen X 2S and Lenovo Legion Y740-15. Please see our table below for an overview of the XMG Neo 15 and our comparison devices.

RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionBest Price
84%11/2019Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.1 kg22 mm15.6"1920x1080
85%08/2019Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.1 kg18 mm15.6"1920x1080
85%05/2019Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.1 kg19 mm15.6"1920x1080
82%09/2019HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.4 kg19.8 mm15.6"1920x1080
85%10/2019Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.3 kg25 mm15.6"1920x1080

Our current review unit shares its chassis, connectivity and input devices with the two XMG Neo 15 laptops that we have reviewed in the last 18 months. Please see our XMG Neo 15 Tongfang GK5CQ7Z and Tongfang GK5CN6Z reviews for our full thoughts on these areas.

Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15

Size Comparison

362 mm / 14.3 inch 265 mm / 10.4 inch 25 mm / 0.984 inch 2.3 kg5.03 lbs362.2 mm / 14.3 inch 261.6 mm / 10.3 inch 19.8 mm / 0.78 inch 2.4 kg5.25 lbs359 mm / 14.1 inch 243 mm / 9.57 inch 22 mm / 0.866 inch 2.1 kg4.53 lbs359 mm / 14.1 inch 255 mm / 10 inch 18 mm / 0.709 inch 2.1 kg4.73 lbs356 mm / 14 inch 250 mm / 9.84 inch 19 mm / 0.748 inch 2.1 kg4.68 lbs

SD Card Reader

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 206, n=262)
91.7 MB/s ∼100% +18%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼85%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=260)
109 MB/s ∼100% +28%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s ∼78%

Communication

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1360 MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1380, n=283)
614 MBit/s ∼45% -55%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1140 MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1160, n=283)
566 MBit/s ∼50% -50%

Display - A solid 1080p and 144 Hz IPS panel

Our current review unit shares its BOE display with the last XMG Neo 15 that we reviewed too. The NV156FHM-N4G is on par with its competitors in most areas and should be good enough for all gamers.

307
cd/m²
302
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
313
cd/m²
279
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 313 cd/m² Average: 294.8 cd/m² Minimum: 11 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 313 cd/m²
Contrast: 1043:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.33 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.77
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.51
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), IPS, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 1920x1080
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
BOE NV156FHM-N4J, IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
27%
-26%
-24%
-41%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
9.6 (4.8, 4.8)
5.2 (2.6, 2.6)
46%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
-58%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
-58%
19 (9, 10)
-98%
Response Time Black / White *
12 (6.8, 5.2)
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
7%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
7%
10.8 (6, 4.8)
10%
10 (6, 4)
17%
PWM Frequency
23580 (24)
Screen
4%
1%
-18%
19%
Brightness middle
313
288
-8%
266
-15%
324.8
4%
477
52%
Brightness
295
265
-10%
248
-16%
316
7%
431
46%
Brightness Distribution
89
84
-6%
89
0%
84
-6%
84
-6%
Black Level *
0.3
0.22
27%
0.31
-3%
0.26
13%
0.175
42%
Contrast
1043
1309
26%
858
-18%
1249
20%
2726
161%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.33
3.22
3%
2.78
17%
4.96
-49%
4.17
-25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.25
6.26
-0%
5.96
5%
8.95
-43%
6.97
-12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.77
1.5
15%
0.91
49%
3.23
-82%
2.51
-42%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.1
3.43
-11%
3.58
-15%
5
-61%
3.49
-13%
Gamma
2.51 88%
2.41 91%
2.46 89%
2.21 100%
2.5 88%
CCT
6930 94%
7290 89%
7186 90%
7742 84%
7076 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
60
2%
62
5%
59.8
1%
60
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90
93
3%
96
7%
91.8
2%
91
1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
16% / 7%
-13% / -3%
-21% / -19%
-11% / 10%

* ... smaller is better

The display achieved a maximum average brightness of 295 cd/m² and a black value of 0.3 cd/m², according to X-Rite i1Pro 2. These combine to deliver a contrast ratio of 1,043:1, which is a respectable value by our standards.

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Colour saturation
CalMAN: Colour saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Grayscale - calibrated
CalMAN: Grayscale - calibrated
CalMAN: Colour saturation - calibrated
CalMAN: Colour saturation - calibrated
CalMAN: ColorChecker - calibrated
CalMAN: ColorChecker - calibrated

The display covers 90% of the sRGB colour space and 59% of AdobeRGB, which is slightly worse than the coverages that all our comparison devices achieved. However, these are still decent values, in our opinion. The XMG Neo 15 has stable viewing angles too, typical of IPS displays.

90% sRGB colour-space coverage
90% sRGB colour-space coverage
Sub-pixel array
Sub-pixel array
59% AdobeRGB colour-space coverage
59% AdobeRGB colour-space coverage

Likewise, the 144 Hz has fast response times, and we did not notice any streaking during our benchmarks. Incidentally, the XMG Neo 15 supports NVIDIA Optimus instead of G-Sync. NVIDIA Optimus technology allows laptops to reduce power consumption by switching from their NVIDIA GPUs to their Intel integrated ones during graphically undemanding tasks. This is not possible with NVIDIA G-Sync.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.8 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9347 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Test Conditions - Standard mode unless otherwise stated

Schenker preinstalled its Control Center software on the XMG Neo 15, with which you can adjust various settings including RGB lighting effects. We should point out that we conducted all our tests with the review unit set to Schenker's standard mode. We also left the fan control on automatic performance mode. This corresponds to the condition in which Schenker delivered the device. We also ran some tests on the Overboost mode, but we will explicitly mention when we have done so.

Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
Control Center

Performance - An i7-9750H and RTX 2070 Max-Q make for a great combination

All versions of the XMG Neo 15 should handle demanding tasks like triple-A games, even the entry-level model with its 8 GB of RAM and 250 GB SSD. This version also comes with a GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GPU as we mentioned at the start of this review, which should remain powerful enough for 60 FPS 1080p for a few years yet. However, we would recommend choosing an RTX GPU along with at least 16 GB of RAM and a 500 GB SSD if you would like to stave off upgrading to a new machine for as long as possible.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon

Processor

The Core i7-9750H is a popular CPU among modern gaming laptops. The hexa-core processor supports Intel Hyper-Threading, 12 MB of L3 cache and it has a 45 W TDP.

CPU information during a Cinebench R15 single-core benchmark
CPU information during a Cinebench R15 single-core benchmark
CPU information during a Cinebench R15 multi-core benchmark
CPU information during a Cinebench R15 multi-core benchmark
CPU and GPU during a UNIGINE Heaven 4.0 benchmark
CPU and GPU during a UNIGINE Heaven 4.0 benchmark

The Core i7-9750H also has a 2.6 GHz base clock, which it can boost up to 4.5 GHz in single-core tasks. The CPU cannot fully utilise its turbo clock speeds when running on Standard mode, with it only able to clock between 4.0 and 4.5 GHz in single-core tasks. Meanwhile, clock speeds fluctuated between 2.6 and 3.8 GHz in multi-core benchmarks like Cinebench R15 Multi 64Bit.

010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250Tooltip
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1002 (974.71-1181)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1066 (1053.71-1188.07)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1007 (976.09-1115.02)
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø968 (959.49-1081.9)
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1132 (1125.75-1244.28)

As our looped CB R15 Multi 64Bit benchmark results below show, the XMG Neo 15 falls short of the CPU performance that many of our comparison devices achieve. This may be because Schenker factory-undervolts its CPUs. Switching to Overboost mode should narrow the gap between the XMG Neo 15 and Lenovo Legion Y740-15, though.

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
457 Points ∼100% +5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-9750H
448 Points ∼98% +3%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
442 Points ∼97% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
434 Points ∼95%
Average of class Gaming
  (340 - 509, n=59)
431 Points ∼94% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
429 Points ∼94% -1%
CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-9750H
2694 Points ∼100% +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (1530 - 4926, n=59)
2558 Points ∼95% +7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
2448 Points ∼91% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
2427 Points ∼90% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
2384 Points ∼88%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
2298 Points ∼85% -4%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
192 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
189 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-9750H
183 Points ∼95% -5%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
181 Points ∼94% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 215, n=535)
157 Points ∼82% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
1188 Points ∼100% +1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-9750H
1188 Points ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
1181 Points ∼99%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1115 Points ∼94% -6%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
1057 Points ∼89% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=538)
841 Points ∼71% -29%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
192 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1181 Points
Help

System Performance

The situation is similar with system performance. 5,522 points in PCMark 10 means last place in our comparison table. However, the gap to the HP Omen X 2S in first place is only 8%, so we doubt that most people would notice any performance differences between any of the devices in our comparison table below.

PCMark 10 - Score
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
5991 Points ∼100% +8%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
5938 Points ∼99% +8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5746 Points ∼96% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5697 Points ∼95% +3%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
5522 Points ∼92%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=231)
5250 Points ∼88% -5%

Storage Devices

Schenker has equipped our review unit with a 1 TB FireCuda 510 M.2-2280 SSD. You can choose other sizes though, as we mentioned earlier in this review. The XMG Neo 15 finished second bottom in our CrystalDiskMark comparison table, but the FireCuda 510 is still a fast drive. Incidentally, you could add a second SSD if you need more storage.

Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
22%
22%
27%
-32%
Write 4K
108.7
108.8
0%
115.5
6%
137.4
26%
134.2
23%
Read 4K
41.4
40.31
-3%
57.97
40%
41.37
0%
37.72
-9%
Write Seq
1083
2488
130%
1555
44%
2500
131%
389.2
-64%
Read Seq
917.2
1916
109%
2590
182%
1576
72%
1030
12%
Write 4K Q32T1
468.5
382.4
-18%
369.3
-21%
446.7
-5%
238.9
-49%
Read 4K Q32T1
529.6
421.8
-20%
441.7
-17%
522.4
-1%
343.9
-35%
Write Seq Q32T1
3057
2542
-17%
1547
-49%
2796
-9%
789.1
-74%
Read Seq Q32T1
3422
3320
-3%
2969
-13%
3415
0%
1501.9
-56%
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3422 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3057 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 529.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 468.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 917.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1083 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 108.7 MB/s

Graphics Card

The GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q is a power-efficient version of the regular GeForce RTX 2070, as we have covered in other RTX 2070 Max-Q laptops that we have reviewed. Greater power efficiency and reduced performance come hand-in-hand, so the RTX 2070 Max-Q cannot quite reach the levels that its more powerful sibling can achieve. The DirectX 12-capable GPU is based on NVIDIA's Turing architecture and comes with 2,304 shader units, 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM and it operates on a 256-bit interface.

3DMark 11 Performance
18275 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
34619 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15226 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
6358 points
Help

The GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q has an 885 MHz base clock, but it can use NVIDIA's GPU Boost to reach almost 1,300 MHz in UNIGINE's Heaven 4.0 benchmark. NVIDIA's GPU Boost is analogous to Intel Turbo Boost, for reference.

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001: Ø60.8 (55-68)

We also subjected our review unit to a The Witcher 3 endurance test where we left the game running for 60 minutes on ultra graphics at 1080p. Frame rates settled at around 60 FPS by the end of this test, with the GPU able to average 1,260 MHz too. Overall, the XMG Neo 15 performs on par with our comparison devices, as our 3DMark 11 and 3DMark 13 benchmark results underline.

3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3921 Points ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3738 Points ∼95%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3721 Points ∼95% 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3719 Points ∼95% -1%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3717 Points ∼95% -1%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6831 Points ∼100% +7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6748 Points ∼99% +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6716 Points ∼98% +5%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6419 Points ∼94% +1%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6387 Points ∼94%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18060 Points ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17419 Points ∼96%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17335 Points ∼96% 0%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16968 Points ∼94% -3%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16483 Points ∼91% -5%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22749 Points ∼100% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22005 Points ∼97% +1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21959 Points ∼97% 0%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21861 Points ∼96%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18434 Points ∼81% -16%

Gaming Performance

As you can see from the table below, we benchmarked several games with our review unit running in Standard and Overboost modes to determine what difference the latter makes to frame rates. Typically, Overboost mode will provide a 20% improvement in frame rates, which helps the XMG Neo 15 power past many of its competitors. You must contend with louder fans on Overboost mode, though. Only CPU-heavy games like FIFA 20 benefit little from Overboost mode, according to our tests.

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
72.6 (min: 59) fps ∼100% +20%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
60.4 (min: 49) fps ∼83%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=331)
50.5 fps ∼70% -16%
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:T2X Filmic SM
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
100.8 (min: 78) fps ∼100% +21%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
83.2 (min: 65) fps ∼83%
Average of class Gaming
  (64 - 83.2, n=3)
76.2 fps ∼76% -8%
GRID 2019 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
79.4 (min: 63) fps ∼100% +22%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
65.1 (min: 54) fps ∼82%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.9 - 67, n=7)
49.1 fps ∼62% -25%
Ghost Recon Breakpoint - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
66 (min: 31) fps ∼100% +16%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
57 (min: 30) fps ∼86%
Average of class Gaming
  (10 - 57, n=8)
41.8 fps ∼63% -27%
FIFA 20 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
210 (min: 164) fps ∼100% +8%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
195 (min: 149) fps ∼93%
Average of class Gaming
  (58.3 - 201, n=9)
147 fps ∼70% -25%
Borderlands 3 - 1920x1080 Badass Overall Quality (DX11)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
63.3 fps ∼100% +19%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
53 fps ∼84%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.3 - 79.4, n=12)
43.7 fps ∼69% -18%
Control - 1920x1080 High Quality Preset (DX11)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
71.2 (min: 63) fps ∼100% +20%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
59.3 (min: 52) fps ∼83%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.2 - 91.7, n=16)
46.9 fps ∼66% -21%
Apex Legends - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:TS AF:16x
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
143 (min: 139) fps ∼100% +16%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
123 (min: 114) fps ∼86%
Average of class Gaming
  (16.5 - 144, n=20)
99.8 fps ∼70% -19%
Rage 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (Resolution Scale Off)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
98.1 (min: 90) fps ∼100% +18%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
83.2 (min: 76) fps ∼85%
Average of class Gaming
  (45.1 - 124, n=21)
79.7 fps ∼81% -4%

The XMG Neo 15 can run all modern triple-A titles at smooth frame rates in 1080p on its standard fan mode, though. Only demanding games like Borderlands 3 and Ghost Recon Breakpoint average less than 60 FPS on its ultra graphics preset, but they still exceed 50 FPS. If you are a 60 FPS fiend, then Overboost mode may be useful for those two games, but our review unit averaged between 60 and 195 FPS in 1080p and ultra graphics on the Standard mode in all other games that we benchmarked.

low med. high ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 113 60.4 fps
Apex Legends (2019) 124 123 fps
Rage 2 (2019) 85.5 83.2 fps
F1 2019 (2019) 147 105 fps
Control (2019) 59.3 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 69.3 53 fps
FIFA 20 (2019) 203 195 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 78 57 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 107 65.1 fps
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 96.9 83.2 fps
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 91.8 84.4 fps

Emissions - Hot and noisy

Fan Noise

The XMG Neo 15 reached 50 dB(A) while playing The Witcher 3 and 54 dB(A) under maximum load, so we would suggest the noise-sensitive of you to look elsewhere for your next gaming laptop. Most of our comparison devices exceeded the 50 dB(A) barrier during our tests too. Only the Lenovo Legion Y740-15 is noticeably quieter than the XMG Neo 15 of our comparison devices, but even that reaches 42.1 dB(A) when gaming.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.839.637.235.732.937.7254445.244.644.842.346.83133.337.736.43534.235.24031.336.736.533.434.234.45039.839.440.83937.533.46334.234.133.430.632.331.88032.533.932.433.930.848.810029.932.232.732.131.433.612530.93331.930.129.232.316034.435.936.735.134.333.520035.628.728.92826.630.825032.627.831.227.726.232.431532.126.927.924.822.834.340030.925.826.121.219.836.150031.92625.420.519.437.36303225.423.620.721.636.280033.725.221.818.417.338.6100034.726.222.718.417.240.6125035.726.623.618.918.841.5160037.828.922.818.318.143.9200038.726.521.61816.844.625003724.120.418.41743.5315035.32319.417.816.944400035.822.419.117.716.744.1500032.120.21817.717.240.9630029.618.517.817.516.939.5800025.21817.717.816.935.21000022.91817.817.71733.41250019.71817.717.518.428.21600018.517.717.717.516.922.6SPL473734.531.730.953.9N5.72.82.31.71.69.3median 32.1median 25.8median 22.7median 18.4median 18.1median 36.2Delta2.72.84.93.343.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSchenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19

Conversely, our review unit averages 34 dB(A) when idling. The fans even switched off completely during some tasks, but expect them to whirr away in the background if you are browsing the web or watching videos.

Noise Level

Idle
31 / 34 / 37 dB(A)
Load
47 / 54 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
2%
-1%
7%
9%
6%
off / environment *
31
30
3%
30
3%
29
6%
30
3%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=333)
5%
Idle Minimum *
31
30
3%
31
-0%
30.5
2%
31.3
-1%
31.4 (28 - 42, n=756)
-1%
Idle Average *
34
33
3%
34
-0%
31.5
7%
31.3
8%
32.6 (28 - 46.6, n=756)
4%
Idle Maximum *
37
39
-5%
39
-5%
31.5
15%
31.3
15%
34.6 (28 - 52, n=756)
6%
Load Average *
47
45
4%
46
2%
40.6
14%
42
11%
40.8 (30.1 - 58, n=757)
13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50
49
2%
53
-6%
49.5
1%
42.1
16%
Load Maximum *
54
51
6%
55
-2%
53.4
1%
46.5
14%
48.2 (38.9 - 64.1, n=757)
11%

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

While the XMG Neo 15 runs about as loudly as our comparison devices, it gets considerably hotter than all but the Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA under full load. Surface temperatures peaked at 66 °C on the underside and 60 °C on the top of our review unit during a Furmark and ​​Prime95 stress test, which are dangerously hot. While we would not recommend gaming with the XMG Neo 15 on your lap, it runs cool enough to do so if you are browsing the web or streaming videos.

System information while playing The Witcher 3
System information while playing The Witcher 3
System information during a combined FurMark and Prime95 stress test
System information during a combined FurMark and Prime95 stress test
Heat map of the top of the device under load
Heat map of the top of the device under load
Heat map of the bottom of the device under load
Heat map of the bottom of the device under load

Taking a look at internal temperatures reveals that the CPU and GPU never exceed 80 °C under load when set to Schenker's standard mode. While we noticed that the GPU throttles slightly at these temperatures, the CPU just cannot reach its boost clock speeds.

Max. Load
 58 °C
136 F
60 °C
140 F
49 °C
120 F
 
 42 °C
108 F
47 °C
117 F
41 °C
106 F
 
 36 °C
97 F
40 °C
104 F
40 °C
104 F
 
Maximum: 60 °C = 140 F
Average: 45.9 °C = 115 F
66 °C
151 F
66 °C
151 F
56 °C
133 F
65 °C
149 F
65 °C
149 F
45 °C
113 F
37 °C
99 F
37 °C
99 F
32 °C
90 F
Maximum: 66 °C = 151 F
Average: 52.1 °C = 126 F
Power Supply (max.)  47 °C = 117 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 60 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 66 °C / 151 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 43 °C / 109.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-14.2 °C / -25.6 F).
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
11%
2%
-11%
-1%
12%
Maximum Upper Side *
60
49
18%
58
3%
48.8
19%
43.9
27%
45.9 (28 - 68.8, n=722)
23%
Maximum Bottom *
66
59
11%
64
3%
55
17%
47.6
28%
49.6 (25.9 - 78, n=720)
25%
Idle Upper Side *
30
28
7%
30
-0%
41
-37%
38.6
-29%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=674)
-3%
Idle Bottom *
32
29
9%
31
3%
45.6
-43%
40.8
-28%
31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=672)
1%

* ... smaller is better

Speakers

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.9342542.338.93134.2324034.2365037.539.76332.334.28030.832.610031.429.512529.231.816034.33320026.632.425026.246.331522.856.640019.862.450019.460.263021.665.980017.376.1100017.273.6125018.866.4160018.165.7200016.866.425001765.3315016.968.2400016.766.5500017.267.5630016.971.5800016.968.4100001767.41250018.464.51600016.959.5SPL30.981.1N1.650median 18.1median 65.7Delta48.431.734.233.7373032.936.637.134.23527.634.32833.424.63823.847.123.952.821.550.722.160.321.664.420.56719.5621868.217.970.518.369.720.869.618.769.717.469.917.769.317.668.517.267.417.464.117.363.217.364.417.162.217.258.517.254.430.5801.448.9median 18median 64.41.76.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSchenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Management - As expected from a 62 Wh battery

Power Consumption

The XMG Neo 15 consumes between 11 and 21 W when idling, which is comparatively economic for a gaming laptop. The device can achieve this as it supports NVIDIA Optimus, so it can switch between its integrated and dedicated GPUs to reduce power consumption. Our review unit also consumed between 94 and 173 W under sustained load, so the XMG Neo 15 should never exceed the capabilities of its 230 W charger.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.9 / 2.4 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 11 / 15 / 21 Watt
Load midlight 94 / 173 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
10%
-38%
-144%
-38%
-39%
Idle Minimum *
11
7
36%
21
-91%
46
-318%
22.2
-102%
19.4 (3.4 - 113, n=718)
-76%
Idle Average *
15
12
20%
23
-53%
59
-293%
24.9
-66%
24.8 (6.6 - 119, n=718)
-65%
Idle Maximum *
21
22
-5%
32
-52%
65.5
-212%
30.6
-46%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=718)
-44%
Load Average *
94
86
9%
97
-3%
99.8
-6%
101
-7%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=709)
-11%
Load Maximum *
173
177
-2%
213
-23%
222.7
-29%
186
-8%
172 (21.9 - 590, n=708)
1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
143
144
-1%
148
-3%
154.1
-8%
143
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

The XMG Neo 15 achieves acceptable runtimes from its 62 Wh battery, in our opinion. The 15-inch laptop typically lasts between 5 and 6 hours in practical scenarios like surfing the internet, which should be long enough for most people. The device only lasted for 7:19 hours when idling though, while it needed recharging after just 1:19 hours of continuous load. Hence, we would recommend bringing the charger with you when you use the XMG Neo 15 on the go.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
7h 19min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 19min
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 62 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q,  Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 72 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 57 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
38%
59%
-37%
-47%
-15%
Reader / Idle
439
666
52%
545
24%
221
-50%
349 (39 - 1174, n=676)
-21%
WiFi v1.3
340
478
41%
421
24%
129
-62%
179
-47%
259 (78 - 622, n=382)
-24%
Load
79
96
22%
181
129%
80
1%
79 (18 - 202, n=642)
0%
H.264
408
257 (88 - 508, n=148)

Pros

+ compact
+ lightweight
+ robust
+ mechanical keyboard
+ RGB backlight
+ 144 Hz panel
+ slim display bezels
+ individually configurable

Cons

- high surface temperatures
- loud fans under sustained load
- no Thunderbolt 3
- underwhelming speakers

Verdict - A laptop that should appeal to almost every gamer

Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 laptop review. Test device courtesy of bestware.com
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 laptop review. Test device courtesy of bestware.com

Overall, the Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 is a good gaming laptop, apart from its high surface temperatures and loud fans when gaming. Our review unit offers balanced yet powerful hardware that should appeal to most gamers.

The mix between the Core i7-9750H and RTX 2070 Max-Q allows the device to play all modern games smoothly on its 144 Hz display. Likewise, the Neo 15's compact metal chassis and mechanical keyboard with RGB backlighting are further reasons to consider it as your next gaming laptop. The ability to individually configure the device is a bonus too.

It would have been nice had Schenker included a Thunderbolt 3 port and better speakers. However, these should not be reasons to discount the XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19, as it excels in other areas.

Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 - 11/25/2019 v7
Florian Glaser

Chassis
82 / 98 → 84%
Keyboard
89%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
61 / 80 → 77%
Weight
63 / 10-66 → 94%
Battery
67 / 95 → 71%
Display
86%
Games Performance
89%
Application Performance
91%
Temperature
68 / 95 → 72%
Noise
65 / 90 → 72%
Audio
74%
Average
76%
84%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 2 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Tongfang GK5CQ7Z) Laptop Review: A gaming laptop with slim bezels
Florian Glaser, 2019-11-27 (Update: 2019-11-29)
Alex Alderson
Alex Alderson - News Editor - @aldersonaj
Prior to writing and translating for Notebookcheck, I worked for various companies including Apple and Neowin. I have a BA in International History and Politics from the University of Leeds, which I have since converted to a Law Degree. Happy to chat on Twitter or Notebookchat.