Notebookcheck

Call of Duty Modern Warfare Notebook and Desktop Benchmarks

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Stanislav Kokhanyuk), 11/04/2019

Back to the roots. With Modern Warfare, Infinity Ward wanted to capitalize on the strengths and successes of the previous titles in the series. In terms of technology, the latest installment in the Call of Duty franchise is supposed to finally look as good as the most recent Battlefield title. Read this performance analysis to find out whether or not Infinity Ward has managed to achieve this. Moreover, our benchmarks also reveal the system requirements for the latest Call of Duty game.

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Especially English native speakers welcome!

Currently wanted: 
News and Editorial Editor - Details here

Technology

After the Call of Duty engine stopped looking like it was designed for AAA titles and started to look rather antiquated when compared to the engines used in other flashy shooters, Modern Warfare made a huge leap forward with its updated engine. One of the biggest highlights is the amount of detail in the game world. The levels of the single-player campaign are just overflowing with objects. The underbrush in the title looks especially impressive, because of the sheer amount of ornamental elements (bushes, leaves, roots etc.).

Thanks to the good presentation, the first-person shooter manages to create a very gritty and realistic atmosphere, which is further enhanced by all the explosions typical of the Call of Duty series. Just like in other CoD games, you see explosions and fire wherever you look. The great sound and the exciting missions lend a cinematic feel to the game. 

Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare

However, the presentation is not perfect. Upon closer inspection, certain textures appear rather muddy. These kinds of textures are not appropriate  in 2019, which is why we think that Frostbite 3-powered Battlefield V from Dice still has an edge over the latest CoD game. That being said, this year difference is not very pronounced. 

Visual improvements do not come without a cost. The first-person shooter requires an extreme 110 GB of free space and a fast Internet connection. We have encountered a game (Final Fantasy XV) that required more storage space only once before. The fact that the game requires an internet connection even in single-player mode is a bit of a shame, and there is no real necessity for it.

Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare

The comprehensive graphics menu deserves praise. It offers not only a whole lot of settings to adjust, but also explanations in the form of text and/or comparison pictures. The top third of the graphics menu is concerned with display settings such as the display mode, refresh rate, resolution and the color correction. You can upscale/downscale the image with the help of the render resolution slider. You can also enable V-Sync and cap the frame rate.

Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare

The two other sections of the menu, known as Details & Textures and Shadow & Lighting, contain settings, which directly affect the visuals of the game. The Raytracing section is also available on certain Nvidia GPUs. However, unlike Battlefield V, which supports ray-traced reflections, Call of Duty Modern Warfare only supports ray-traced shadows. The graphics menu also contains settings for post processing. Here, the setting for SMAA is the most relevant one.

Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare

Positive: settings can be changed without a restart. If you have an SSD, adjusting the settings should not be much of a hassle, because in that case loading times are quite short. However, things would have been even easier had the developer included usable graphics presets. There have not been any such presets in CoD games for years, though. Having said that, the VRAM usage meter and the FSP counter soften the blow a little. Speaking of VRAM: if you want to run Modern Warfare on the highest settings you will need at least 4 GB of it.

Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare

At the time of release, the title is more or less well-optimized. However, in the course of our performance analysis, we have encountered a number of issues, which we would like to highlight here.

- When you launch the game for the first time, it might take several minutes for the shaders to install. The notification that is supposed to inform you that shaders are being installed sometimes disappears.
- When you connect an external monitor the graphics menu often stops opening. Here, setting the notebook screen as the default display for a short time should fix the issue.
- There is some stuttering during the log-in process.
- Video playback is not always smooth (a typical CoD phenomenon)
- There are occasional stutters in the single-player campaign, especially on low-end systems

Minimum Settings
Minimum Settings
Minimum Settings
Minimum Settings
Raytracing disabled
Raytracing disabled
Raytracing enabled
Raytracing enabled

Benchmarks

Because Modern Warfare is a DirectX 12 title, we had to use OCAT instead of Fraps for recording the frame rate. The beginning of the first campaign mission, which is known as Fog of War, serves as the benchmark. As you can see from the video below, the benchmark starts when the level is fully loaded and the helicopter appears. After the initial 20-second-long cut scene, we stealthily follow Sgt. Hoyt through the forest until he has to hunker down because he sights an enemy. 


The benchmark does not represent the worst case scenario. However, it provides a good snapshot of how the title performs most of the time. Modern Warfare is playable at 40 FPS, but for a really smooth gaming experience, we recommend 60 FPS or higher.

Results

HD (1280x720) & FHD (1920x1080)

Owners of laptops without a dedicated GPU should not buy this title. The Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5 2500U) kept crashing in our benchmark. To run Modern Warfare smoothly, you will need at least a mid-range GPU. For a lag-free experience on low settings, you will need a GeForce GTX 1050. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti should be fast enough for medium settings. If you want to game on the highest settings at 1080p, then you will need a GeForce GTX 1650 or GTX 1060.

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019
    1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:T2X Filmic SM     1920x1080 High Settings AA:1X SM     1920x1080 Medium Settings     1280x720 Minimum Settings
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 7740X
MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
162 (99% > 104.2) fps ∼96%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 2080
145 (min: 108) fps ∼86%
178 (min: 137) fps ∼94%
187 (min: 149) fps ∼91%
274 (min: 192) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
141 (min: 112) fps ∼83%
168 (min: 131) fps ∼88%
171 (min: 137) fps ∼83%
248 (min: 189) fps ∼91%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), 7740X
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
122 (99% > 74.1) fps ∼72%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), 9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 2070
115 (min: 89) fps ∼68%
145 (min: 109) fps ∼76%
147 (min: 112) fps ∼72%
219 (min: 154) fps ∼80%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SF
105 (min: 78) fps ∼62%
130 (min: 96) fps ∼68%
132 (min: 104) fps ∼64%
199 (min: 135) fps ∼73%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 2060
105 (min: 81) fps ∼62%
130 (min: 95) fps ∼68%
135 (min: 97) fps ∼66%
203 (min: 145) fps ∼74%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 9900K
MSI GeForce GTX 1080
102 (min: 82) fps ∼60%
124 (min: 97) fps ∼65%
134 (min: 110) fps ∼65%
204 (min: 156) fps ∼74%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Alienware 17 R4
100 (min: 66) fps ∼59%
120 (min: 80) fps ∼63%
133 (min: 90) fps ∼65%
176 (min: 116) fps ∼64%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
MSI GE65 Raider 9SE
91.1 (min: 71) fps ∼54%
107 (min: 83) fps ∼56%
114 (min: 91) fps ∼56%
179 (min: 128) fps ∼65%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 9900K
MSI GeForce GTX 1070
85.5 (min: 67) fps ∼51%
103 (min: 82) fps ∼54%
113 (min: 93) fps ∼55%
177 (min: 135) fps ∼65%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
84.1 (min: 64) fps ∼50%
103 (min: 75) fps ∼54%
109 (min: 82) fps ∼53%
179 (min: 125) fps ∼65%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
Asus G752VS
83.4 (min: 60) fps ∼49%
101 (min: 69) fps ∼53%
107 (min: 75) fps ∼52%
169 (min: 110) fps ∼62%
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop), 7740X
i7-7740X Asus X299 Prime
70 (99% > 54.9) fps ∼41%
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, 3750H
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
64 (99% > 47.8) fps ∼38%
81 (99% > 36.1) fps ∼43%
94 (99% > 40.7) fps ∼46%
112 (99% > 33.3) fps ∼41%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 9900K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060
57.9 (min: 47) fps ∼34%
70.6 (min: 56) fps ∼37%
77.9 (min: 65) fps ∼38%
126 (min: 97) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6820HK
MSI GT62VR
54.8 (min: 42) fps ∼32%
68.4 (min: 51) fps ∼36%
73.1 (min: 53) fps ∼36%
123 (min: 81) fps ∼45%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9750H
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SC
53.5 (min: 44) fps ∼32%
66.5 (min: 53) fps ∼35%
70.1 (min: 58) fps ∼34%
121 (min: 96) fps ∼44%
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 7740X
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB, Asus X299 Prime
31.7 (99% > 26) fps ∼19%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
MSI GE72 7RE
30.6 (min: 24) fps ∼18%
36 (min: 28) fps ∼19%
47.4 (min: 39) fps ∼23%
82.3 (min: 63) fps ∼30%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Asus GL753VD
29.8 (min: 24) fps ∼18%
35.7 (min: 30) fps ∼19%
38.5 (min: 31) fps ∼19%
65.6 (min: 50) fps ∼24%

QHD (2560x1440) & UHD (3840x2160)

If you want to game at resolutions above 1080p, then you will need a true high-end GPU. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti or the GTX 1070 should be powerful enough for 1440p, whereas the GeForce RTX 2070 or the GTX 1080 should be good enough for 4K.

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019
    3840x2160 Maximum Settings AA:T2X Filmic SM     2560x1440 Maximum Settings AA:T2X Filmic SM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), 7740X
MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
77 (99% > 54.9) fps ∼96%
127 (99% > 83.3) fps ∼96%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 2080
65.1 (min: 52) fps ∼81%
110 (min: 81) fps ∼83%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
58.8 (min: 49) fps ∼74%
102 (min: 84) fps ∼77%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop), 7740X
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
51.7 (99% > 36.8) fps ∼65%
91 (99% > 62.1) fps ∼69%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), 9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 2070
50.5 (min: 43) fps ∼63%
86.6 (min: 71) fps ∼66%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 2060
43.1 (min: 35) fps ∼54%
76 (min: 63) fps ∼58%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SF
42.5 (min: 35) fps ∼53%
75.4 (min: 60) fps ∼57%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 9900K
MSI GeForce GTX 1080
42.3 (min: 35) fps ∼53%
74.3 (min: 61) fps ∼56%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Alienware 17 R4
40.2 (min: 33) fps ∼50%
73.8 (min: 55) fps ∼56%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
MSI GE65 Raider 9SE
35 (min: 28) fps ∼44%
62.9 (min: 51) fps ∼48%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 9900K
MSI GeForce GTX 1070
33.8 (min: 27) fps ∼42%
61.5 (min: 51) fps ∼47%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
32.8 (min: 27) fps ∼41%
58.8 (min: 47) fps ∼45%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
Asus G752VS
31.1 (min: 24) fps ∼39%
57.4 (min: 44) fps ∼43%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 9900K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060
22 (min: 17) fps ∼28%
40.8 (min: 35) fps ∼31%
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, 3750H
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK
20.1 (99% > 14.6) fps ∼25%
35.4 (99% > 28.8) fps ∼27%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6820HK
MSI GT62VR
19.8 (min: 16) fps ∼25%
37.4 (min: 29) fps ∼28%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Asus GL753VD
9.5 (min: 8) fps ∼12%
17.6 (min: 14) fps ∼13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9750H
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SC
6.7 (min: 6) fps ∼8%
37.6 (min: 31) fps ∼28%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ
MSI GE72 7RE
4.3 (min: 3) fps ∼5%
21.2 (min: 16) fps ∼16%

Ray tracing

Looking at the ray-tracing performance is especially interesting. This feature can be enabled with many non-RTX GPUs, which leads to an extreme drop in performance (up to 70%). However, RTX chips “only” lose 30% of their performance. Here, the GeForce RTX 2060 is able to achieve smooth frame rates on the highest settings at 1080p.

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019
    3840x2160 Maximum Settings with Raytracing AA:T2X Filmic SM     1920x1080 Maximum Settings with Raytracing AA:T2X Filmic SM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition, 7740X
15.5 (99% > 8.8) fps ∼26%
46.3 (99% > 24.4) fps ∼32%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
MSI GeForce RTX 2080, 9900K
110 (min: 78) fps ∼77%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG, 9900K
103 (min: 80) fps ∼72%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop)
MSI GeForce RTX 2070, 9900K
90.5 (min: 66) fps ∼63%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
MSI GeForce RTX 2060, 9900K
78.8 (min: 58) fps ∼55%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SF, 9750H
75.8 (min: 56) fps ∼53%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
MSI GE65 Raider 9SE, 9750H
65.6 (min: 49) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
MSI GeForce GTX 1080, 9900K
38.4 (min: 24) fps ∼27%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD, 9750H
37.8 (min: 24) fps ∼26%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Alienware 17 R4, 7820HK
36.4 (min: 22) fps ∼25%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
MSI GeForce GTX 1070, 9900K
30.6 (min: 18) fps ∼21%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Asus G752VS, 6820HK
30.3 (min: 18) fps ∼21%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060, 9900K
19.8 (min: 12) fps ∼14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GT62VR, 6820HK
17.9 (min: 11) fps ∼13%

Note

Because benchmarking games is very time-consuming and often constrained by installation/activation limits, at the time of publishing, we were able to provide only a part of our performance analysis of Call of Duty Modern Warfare. Other graphics cards will be added in the coming days and weeks.

Overview

Show Restrictions
      Model
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019
 Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019)
low
1280x720
Minimum Settings
med.
1920x1080
Medium Settings
high
1920x1080
High Settings
1X SMAA
ultra
1920x1080
Maximum Settings
T2X Filmic SMAA
QHD
2560x1440
Maximum Settings
T2X Filmic SMAA
4K
3840x2160
Maximum Settings
T2X Filmic SMAA
NVIDIA Titan RTX
207
205
190
169
132
80
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
162
127
77
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
203
191
163
144
110
65
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
274
187
178
145
110
65.1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
248
171
168
141
102
58.8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
122
91
51.7
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
200
155
132
114
84
48.5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
240
180
148
128
95
54.8
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)
209
146
128
112
79
44.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop)
219
147
145
115
86.6
50.5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
204
134
124
102
74.3
42.3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
199
132
130
105
75.4
42.5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
187
141
125
109
80
46
AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)
181
130
110
95
68
37.8
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
192
147
121
106
78
44.3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
176
133
120
100
73.8
40.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
203
135
130
105
76
43.1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
96.9
92n2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
179
114
100.45n2
91.1n3
62.9
35
      Model
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
177
113
103
85.5
61.5
33.8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
169
107
101
83.4
57.4
31.1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)
163
117
96
84
59.3
32.4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
179
109
103
84.1
58.8
32.8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
76
54.2
31.5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)
159
112
90
79
56.8
31.6
AMD Radeon RX 590 (Desktop)
114
99
85
76
55.8
30.5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop)
126
77.9
70.6
57.9
40.8
22
AMD Radeon RX 570 (Desktop)
131
91
75
64
46.8
23.1
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop)
70
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
123
73.1
68.4
54.8
37.4
19.8
AMD Radeon RX 5500M
112
94
81
64
35.4
20.1
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
34.7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
121
70.1
66.5
53.5
37.6
6.7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop)
110
74
61
51.7
35.7
19.1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
82.3
47.4
36
30.6
21.2
4.3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
43.2
33.9
24
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
56.6
33.9
30.7
17.1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
65.6
38.5
35.7
29.8
17.6
9.5
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
31.7
      Model
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
39.3
23.4
(-) * Smaller values are better. / n123 Number of benchmarks for this median value / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Benchmarked Devices

Device GPU CPU RAM OS
Desktop-PC I MSI GeForce RTX 2080 (8 GB GDDR6)
MSI GeForce RTX 2070 (8 GB GDDR6)
MSI GeForce RTX 2060 (6 GB GDDR6)
MSI GeForce GTX 1080 (8 GB GDDR5X)
MSI GeForce GTX 1070 (8 GB GDDR5)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB GDDR5)
Intel Core i9-9900K 4 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
Desktop-PC II Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (11 GB GDDR5X)
Asus GeForce GTX 980 Ti (6 GB GDDR5)
XFX Radeon R9 Fury (4 GB HBM)
Sapphire Radeon R9 290X (4 GB GDDR5)
Sapphire Radeon R9 280X (3 GB GDDR5)
MSI Radeon R7 370 (2 GB GDDR5)
Intel Core i7-7740X 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
Desktop-PC III Nvidia Titan RTX (24 GB GDDR6)
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super (8 GB GDDR6)
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super (8 GB GDDR6)
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super (8 GB GDDR6)
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 Super (8 GB GDDR6)
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal) (12 GB GDDR5X)
PNY GeForce GTX 1660 (6 GB GDDR5)
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR5)
Zotac GeForce GT 1030 (2 GB GDDR5)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (8 GB GDDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 (8 GB GDDR6)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (8 GB HBM2)
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 (8 GB GDDR5)
Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 570 (8 GB GDDR5)
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GT76 Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 (8 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i9-9900K 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GP65 Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 (8 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-9750H 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GE65 Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 (6 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-9750H 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GP65 Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (6 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-9750H 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GP75 Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR5) Intel Core i7-9750H 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
Alienware 17 R4 Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 (8 GB GDDR5X) Intel Core i7-7820HK 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
Asus G752VS Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 (8 GB GDDR5) Intel Core i7-6820HK 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GT62VR Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB GDDR5) Intel Core i7-6820HK 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GE72 Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (2 GB GDDR5) Intel Core i7-7700HQ 2 x 4 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
Asus GL753VD Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 (4 GB GDDR5) Intel Core i7-7700HQ 1 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GL62 Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 (2 GB GDDR5) Intel Core i7-7700HQ 2 x 4 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GE72 Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (2 GB GDDR5) Intel Core i7-6700HQ 1 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI PE60 Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M (2 GB GDDR5) Intel Core i7-6700HQ 2 x 4 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI CX72 Nvidia GeForce 940MX (2 GB DDR3) Intel Core i7-6700HQ 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GP62 Nvidia GeForce 940M (2 GB DDR3) Intel Core i7-5700HQ 1 x 8 GB DDR3 Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI CX61 Nvidia GeForce 920M (2 GB DDR3) Intel Celeron 2970M 1 x 8 GB DDR3 Windows 10 64 Bit
Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 1 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
4K Monitore Nvidia Treiber AMD Treiber
Asus PB287Q, Philips Momentum 436M6VBPAB ForceWare 441.08 Adrenalin 19.10.2
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Call of Duty Modern Warfare Notebook and Desktop Benchmarks
Florian Glaser, 2019-11- 4 (Update: 2019-11- 6)