Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super with Max-Q design is the power saving variant of the mobile GeForce RTX 2080 Super with reduced clock speeds, performance and of course power consumption. It is intended for thin gaming laptops and based on the same TU104 chip with 3,072 shaders, 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a 256 Bit memory bus.

Currently it looks like there are three variants with a TGP of 80, 85 and 90 Watt. The clock speed ranges from 735 - 975 MHz for the base clock speed and 1080 - 1230 for the boost.

With the refresh, Nvidia also reworked the Max-Q technologies for more efficiency. Low Voltage GDDR6 (lower clocked but more headroom for the GPU) and improved regulator efficiency should improve the performance per Watt. Two new optional features can also be implemented by the OEM. Max-Q Dynamic Boost is able to shift power from the CPU to the GPU on a per frame basis to increase overall performance. Furthermore, the laptop manufacturer can also implement Advanced Optimus with a dynamic display switch (hardware) to enable Optimus, G-SYNC and high refresh rate displays (up to 4K 120 Hz).

Features

NVIDIA manufacturers the TU104 chip on a 12 nm FinFET process and includes features like Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) and Real-Time Ray Tracing (RTRT), which should combine to create more realistic lighting effects than older GPUs based on the company's Pascal architecture (if the games supports it). The RTX 2080 Super Max-Q is also DisplayPort 1.4 ready, while there is also support for HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) and H.265 video en/decoding (PlayReady 3.0).

Performance

Due to the lower clock rates, the Max-Q variant is clearly slower than the mobile RTX 2080 Super. In our benchmarks with the first devices, the performance is very similar to the old RTX 2080 Max-Q and only on a level with the non Max-Q RTX 2070. Therefore, the performance is ideal for 1440p gaming at max details for demanding games like Red Dead Redemption 2, Control or Borderlands 3. Less demanding games like F1 2019 can be played in 4k with maximum settings. Detailed gaming benchmarks can be found at the end of this page.

The power consumption of the card is between 80 - 90 Watt TGP and therefore significantly lower than the RTX 2080 Super Mobile (150 - 200 Watt).

GeForce RTX 2000 Series

NVIDIA Titan RTX compare 4608 @ 1.35 - 1.77 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop) compare 4352 @ 1.35 - 1.55 GHz352 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop) compare 3072 @ 1.65 - 1.82 GHz256 Bit @ 15500 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop) compare 2944 @ 1.52 - 1.71 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile compare 3072 @ 1.37 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile compare 2944 @ 1.38 - 1.59 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop) compare 2560 @ 1.61 - 1.77 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop) compare 2304 @ 1.41 - 1.62 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile compare 2560 @ 1.14 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14002 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q 3072 @ 0.98 - 1.23 GHz256 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop) compare 2176 @ 1.47 - 1.65 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile compare 2304 @ 1.22 - 1.44 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q compare 2944 @ 0.74 - 1.1 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop) compare 1920 @ 1.32 - 1.62 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.93 - 1.16 GHz256 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q compare 2304 @ 0.89 - 1.19 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile compare 1920 @ 0.96 - 1.2 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.98 - 1.19 GHz192 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile compare 2048 @ 1.48 GHz64 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameN18E-G3
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines3072 - unified
Core Speed975 - 1230 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed11000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption90 Watt
Transistor Count13.6 Billion
technology12 nm
FeaturesNVLink, DLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor, 650 Watt system power recommended
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement02.04.2020

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 7475     avg: 8204     median: 8075 (23%)     max: 9051 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 7372     avg: 8210     median: 8331 (22%)     max: 8979 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 32880     avg: 42751     median: 44534 (48%)     max: 53680 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 101976     avg: 126108     median: 127741 (34%)     max: 140750 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 17053     avg: 18565     median: 18578.5 (33%)     max: 20173 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 19655     avg: 21743     median: 21902.5 (25%)     max: 23649 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 20888     avg: 23821     median: 24119 (33%)     max: 26066 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 26292     avg: 29663     median: 29636.5 (25%)     max: 32995 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 snx-03 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 114     avg: 140.1     median: 142 (8%)     max: 152.1 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
161 Watt (23%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
149 Watt (21%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 140     avg: 150.1     median: 146.1 (32%)     max: 170 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4418     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (56%)     max: 0.635 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 41     avg: 48.1     median: 48 (77%)     max: 54 dB(A)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1215     avg: 1371     median: 1387.5 (54%)     max: 1506 MHz
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
148  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
109  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
74 76 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
139.8 166.1 ~ 153 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
118.7 123.5 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
108.6 114.5 ~ 112 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
104.5 112.8 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
219 253 268 ~ 247 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
167 174 184 ~ 175 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
149 150 161 ~ 153 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
102 115 118 119 126 ~ 116 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
89  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
51  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
188.8 210.4 267.4 ~ 222 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
161.2 171.6 184.5 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
110.6 114 122.2 126.2 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
78.4 82.9 84.3 89.7 92.7 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
54 57.9 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28.1 30.3 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
205 212.2 249 256 ~ 231 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
164 165.1 167.6 168.3 176.6 ~ 168 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
147.1 147.9 150 154 156.7 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
140 144.4 147 152.1 155.1 163.7 165.2 177.7 ~ 156 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
108 116.7 131.2 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
58 64 73.3 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
207.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
119 121.4 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
101 102 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
68.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
121  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
121 121 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
120 121 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
119 120 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
83.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
113.3 131.4 138.4 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
96.5 98 99.7 101.5 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62.4 62.7 67.4 68.3 69 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.6 41 43.7 44.9 45 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
35 36.2 37 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.5 23.5 23.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
95.7 99.5 113.7 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93.1 94.1 102 103.7 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
88.7 89.9 95.2 97.5 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
72.2 76.2 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
36.8 42.7 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
101.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
92 93 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84 86.6 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
76.9 83.3 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
66.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
40.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
165.5 172.3 ~ 169 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
114.1 123.6 134 ~ 124 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
96.4 104.3 114 129 ~ 111 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
91.2 91.8 93.8 107 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
64.7 67.3 78.9 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
36.3 36.8 44.5 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 1920x1080
64.8
85.1
60.2
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 3840x2160
26.1
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
174.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
85.9 125 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
77.7 111 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72 74 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
66.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
46.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
117 128 130 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
93 95 96 102 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
86 87 88 92 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65 65 66 70 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
49 53 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
29 31 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
med. 1920x1080
251  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
217 241 ~ 229 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
213 240 ~ 227 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
189 239 ~ 214 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
114 190 ~ 152 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
128.3 132.5 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
101.6 105.7 107 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78.2 79.8 81.1 84.3 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
62.5 63.5 68.1 71.6 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
49.1 51.7 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26.6 26.9 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
116.1
122.3
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
221.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
96.6 107 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
71 71.1 79.8 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
46.1 48.4 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
22 24.9 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Quality Preset & High Ray Tracing Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
45.5
41.1
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
205  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
168 174 ~ 171 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
141 147 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
138 142 ~ 140 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
122  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
74  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
227.8 233 245.5 273.1 ~ 245 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
123.8 127.8 136.4 142.4 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
83.8 86.5 88.5 95.4 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
61 62.5 64.1 69 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
39.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
med. 1920x1080
126  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
102 106 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
101 103 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
63.8 68.4 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.9 34.1 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
159  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
94 98.2 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
74.4 76.7 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.4 44.9 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
38.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
165  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
117 129 ~ 123 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
96 112 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73 80 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
59  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
252  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
166 168.4 ~ 167 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
158.5 162 ~ 160 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
90 98.8 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
76.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
103  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97 98 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
87 92 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
71 78 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
43 48 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
131 143.3 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
93.2 96.2 101 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70.3 74.4 77.8 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57.2 59 63.4 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
51.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Quality DXR 16xAF 1920x1080
53.9
47.1
48.5
low 1280x720
299  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
194 196 ~ 195 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
148.8 165 ~ 157 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
147.6 163 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
118  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
65  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
152  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
113  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
105  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
73.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
109  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
103  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
82.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
43.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
154.3 173 ~ 164 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
124.7 139 148 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
116.2 127 127 135 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
109.7 118 119 125 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
95.4 96.1 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
52.6 58.7 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset DXR 1920x1080
68.3
59.4
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
med. 1920x1080
86.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
76  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
46.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
102  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87 92 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
75 78 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54 58 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
53  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
103 117 138 139 150 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
95 104 109 111 116 120 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93 100 104 105 105 110 116 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
89 91 92 92 93 96 97 99 103 106 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
63 67 72 75 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32 36 39 41 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
102
118
126
137
med. 1920x1080
105  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
63.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
111 143 154 ~ 136 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
100 115 122 ~ 112 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
96 108 116 ~ 107 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
91 101 102 110 ~ 101 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
77  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
42  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
125
109
136
low 1280x720
102 107 109 113 114 114 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
90.9 93.4 95.8 97.6 99.8 104 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.8 79.5 80.8 82.8 84.3 87.6 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
67  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
119  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
100  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
56.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
103  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
67 80.8 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
37.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
med. 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
114  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
99.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
80.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
44.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
134.3 146 146.6 147 155 156 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
128.7 132 134 135.8 141 141 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
117.4 122 123 124.2 134 139 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
115 116 117.7 118 125 128 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
102  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
308.4 310.3 330.5 345 348.2 ~ 328 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
236 237 239.5 239.9 245 251.3 ~ 241 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
138 142.7 143 143.4 153.2 159.8 160 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
74.3 75.1 75.8 82.6 83.4 87.7 88.6 88.8 90.2 95.8 96 ~ 85 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
49.8 53.5 54.3 58.2 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
36.7
43
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
179 180 ~ 180 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
172 174 ~ 173 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
153 157 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
85.3 85.8 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
71.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
35.7
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
172
169
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
177
176
low 1280x720
347.4 400 425.1 426.3 ~ 400 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
330.2 344.4 349.2 364.5 ~ 347 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
300.5 319.9 323.7 324.2 ~ 317 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
170.2 173 173.1 181.1 ~ 174 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Horizon Zero Dawn1481099075
Death Stranding153121112109
F1 20202471751531168951
Gears Tactics222172118865629
Doom Eternal23116815115611965
Hunt Showdown207.412010268.832.4
Escape from Tarkov12112112112083.139.7
Red Dead Redemption 21289966433623
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order10398937440
Need for Speed Heat101.993858066.940.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019169124111967039
GRID 2019174.8105947366.446.9
Ghost Recon Breakpoint1259788675130
FIFA 20251229227214152
Borderlands 313010581665027
Control221.7102744723
F1 201920517114414012274
Total War: Three Kingdoms245133896439.919.6
Rage 21261041026633
Anno 180015996764538.823.2
The Division 2165123104775931
Dirt Rally 2.02521671609476.4
Far Cry New Dawn10398907546
Metro Exodus13797746051.231.6
Apex Legends29919515715511865
Just Cause 415211310573.941.3
Darksiders III11210910382.143.2
Battlefield V1641371261189656
Hitman 286.778.6777646.1
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey1029077565332
Shadow of the Tomb Raider129109105966937
Monster Hunter World10597.79063.331.9
Far Cry 51361121071017742
X-Plane 11.11110978267
Kingdom Come: Deliverance1191007256.131.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1037437.6
Fortnite12111499.580.344.5
Dota 2 Reborn147135127120102
The Witcher 33282411498554
GTA V1801731558671.5
BioShock Infinite400347317174
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


3
27


20
21


29
12

3
27
7

11
20
2
6
24
6
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 17. 08:44:33

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.048s ... 0.049s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.049s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.049s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10305 +0.015s ... 0.065s

#7 got single benchmarks 10305 +0.047s ... 0.112s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.112s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.692s ... 0.804s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.804s

#11 Got 528 rows for game benchmarks. +0.073s ... 0.877s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.877s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.036s ... 0.913s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +2.25s ... 3.164s

#15 return log +0.1s ... 3.264s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q graphics card

Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05 (Legion 7i) Laptop Review: Top performance and display

Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05 (Legion 7i) Laptop Review: Top performance and display

With a GeForce RTX 2080 Super, an Intel Core i9-10980HK, and a 240-Hz display, the Legion 7 is clearly targeted toward gamers that don't want to make any compro...
Intel Core i9-10980HK | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 15.60" | 2.4 kg
Schenker Key 15 (Clevo PC50DN2) in review: A lot of performance in a slim, compact case

Schenker Key 15 (Clevo PC50DN2) in review: A lot of performance in a slim, compact case

Thanks to its powerful hardware, the soberly designed Schenker Key 15 brings all the latest computer games smoothly onto the matte 15.6-inch screen (Full HD, IP...
Intel Core i7-10875H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 15.60" | 2 kg
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS

Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 Laptop Review: Slim Gigantic Gaming Notebook with 300-Hz Panel

Asus wants to combine those characteristics in the Zephyrus S17. With Nvidia's RTX 2080 Super in the Max-Q design and a powerful Intel Core i7-10875H, the basic...
Intel Core i7-10875H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 17.30" | 2.6 kg
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (2020) in review: Detail improvements pay off

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (2020) in review: Detail improvements pay off

Razer's compact 15.6-incher is packed with powerful hardware that brings all the latest games smoothly onto the matte Full HD screen (300 Hz, IPS). There's also...
Intel Core i7-10875H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 15.60" | 2.2 kg
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS in Review: Unique Gaming Laptop with Lots of Performance Below the Hood

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS in Review: Unique Gaming Laptop with Lots of Performance Below the Hood

With its powerful hardware, the Zephyrus Duo manages to display the latest games smoothly on its matte 4K screen (IPS, Pantone-validated, 100% AdobeRGB, G-Sync)...
Intel Core i9-10980HK | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 15.60" | 2.5 kg

MSI Creator 17 A10SGS: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.30", 2.4 kg
  Review » MSI Creator 17 A10SGS Laptop Review: Winning with a Mini LED

MSI GS66 10SGS: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  Review » MSI GS66 Stealth 10SGS Laptop Review: Core i7 or Core i9?

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  Review » Acer Predator Triton 500 laptop review: Superstar

Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE

Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502LXS-XS79: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502LXS-XS79

Lenovo Legion 7 15IMHG05-81YU0007FR: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 7 15IMHG05-81YU0007FR

MSI GS66 10SGS-084NL: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI GS66 10SGS-084NL

Acer ConceptD 7 Ezel CC715-71-7163: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 7 Ezel CC715-71-7163

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS-HC060T: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS-HC060T

Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502LXS-HF012T: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502LXS-HF012T

Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001UGE: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001UGE

MSI GE66 Raider 10SGS-062RU: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI GE66 Raider 10SGS-062RU

MSI GE66 Raider 10SGS-498XES: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI GE66 Raider 10SGS-498XES

MSI Creator 17 A10SGS: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.30", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI Creator 17 A10SGS

Alienware m15 R3, 10980HK RTX 2080 Super Max Q: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Alienware m15 R3, 10980HK RTX 2080 Super Max Q

Origin PC EVO15-S 2020: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Origin PC EVO15-S 2020

Lenovo Legion 7i-81YU0035SB: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 7i-81YU0035SB

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Edition, i7-10875H, RTX 2080 Super Max-Q: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 15 Advanced Edition, i7-10875H, RTX 2080 Super Max-Q

Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701L: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701L

Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q

Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS-XS99: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS-XS99

MSI GE66 10SGS-074: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI GE66 10SGS-074

Aorus 17X YB-9UK2452MP: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 17.30", 3.8 kg
  External Review » Aorus 17X YB-9UK2452MP

MSI GS66 10SGS-205: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » MSI GS66 10SGS-205

Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT000UGE: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT000UGE

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS

Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502LXS-HF038T: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502LXS-HF038T

Aorus 15G YB-8DE2130MH: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Aorus 15G YB-8DE2130MH

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3

Lenovo Legion 7i: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 7i

MSI GS66 10SGS: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » MSI GS66 10SGS

  Article » Staying secure in the new normal: How AMD Ryzen Pro processors ensure 24x7 protection for your critical data

  Article » MSI laptops are the ideal Holiday season gifts for the avid gamer or content producer in your life

Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.4 kg
   » The Lenovo Legion 7 is equipped with a breathtaking 240-Hz display

SCHENKER Key 15 Comet Lake: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2 kg
   » The Schenker Key 15 gaming laptop weighs just under 2 kg

Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.30", 2.6 kg
   » Asus ROG Zephyrus S17: A Large Gamer with the RTX 2080 Super Max-Q

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
   » A 300 Hz display for the Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (2020)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS: Intel Core i9-10980HK, 15.60", 2.5 kg
   » Asus' high-tech Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS comes with many accessories

MSI Creator 17 A10SGS: Intel Core i7-10875H, 17.30", 2.4 kg
   » MSI Creator 17: A great display in a weak case

MSI GS66 10SGS: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
   » The MSI GS66 has an annoying counterintuitive feature that we can't wrap our heads around

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
   » Acer Predator Triton 500: Opening night for the RTX 2080 Super Max-Q

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-03-27)