Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (2020) in review: Detail improvements pay off

Fine tuning. Razer's compact 15.6-incher is packed with powerful hardware that brings all the latest games smoothly onto the matte Full HD screen (300 Hz, IPS). There's also an NVMe SSD, 16 GB of RAM, and a Thunderbolt 3 port.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), Published 08/12/2020 🇩🇪 🇮🇹 ...

With the Blade 15 Advanced Model (2020), Razer delivers a classy, slim 15.6-inch gaming laptop equipped with powerful hardware. Our test device comes with a Core i7-10875H octa-core processor and a GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GPU. Since the computer is identical in construction to its predecessor, we won't go into the case, connectivity, input devices, and speakers in this review - unless there are differences. The corresponding information can be found in the review of the Blade 15 Advanced Model (2019).

The laptop's competitors are devices like the Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX, the Gigabyte Aero 15 XB, the MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS, and the Schenker XMG Neo 15.

Test device courtesy of Razer

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Blade 15 RTX Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1080 MHz, Memory: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, 256-bit interface, 27.21.14.5167 (Nvidia 451.67), Optimus

Memory

16 GB

, DDR4 3200, dual-channel, two memory slots (both occupied)

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, glossy: no, 300 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM470

Storage

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, 1024 GB

, 883 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC298 @ Intel Comet Point PCH - cAVS

Connections

5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: combo audio, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, TPM 2.0

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 17.8 x 355 x 235 ( = 0.7 x 13.98 x 9.25 in)

Battery

80 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, MS Office 365 (trial version), 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.2 kg ( = 77.6 oz / 4.85 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)

Price

3300 Euro

Links

Razer homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.9 %	08/2020	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	2.2 kg	17.8 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
81.5 %	04/2019	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	2.1 kg	15.75 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
85.8 %	05/2020	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	2.2 kg	20 mm	15.60"	3840x2160
84.6 %	07/2020	MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	2.4 kg	23 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.8 %	11/2019	Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.1 kg	22 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

Size comparison

MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q DIN A4 ❌

Connectivity - USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2 substitutes the Mini DisplayPort

In terms of connections, a bit has changed compared to the 2019 Blade 15. The Mini DisplayPort has been replaced by a USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2 port (DisplayPort, Power Delivery). The three USB Type-A ports now also work according to the USB 3.2 Gen 2 standard. The laptop has also gained a memory card reader (SD).

Left side: power supply, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-A), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery), combo audio

Right side: memory card reader (SD), Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-A), HDMI, cable lock slot

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	204 MB/s ∼100% +3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	198 MB/s ∼97%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	190 MB/s ∼93% -4%
Average of class Gaming (48.5 - 209, n=91, last 2 years)	105.6 MB/s ∼52% -47%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	78 MB/s ∼38% -61%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	243 MB/s ∼100% +18%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	206 MB/s ∼85%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	202 MB/s ∼83% -2%
Average of class Gaming (72 - 269, n=82, last 2 years)	129.1 MB/s ∼53% -37%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	85 MB/s ∼35% -59%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1622 (1486^min - 1748^max) MBit/s ∼100% +17%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1386 (1331^min - 1568^max) MBit/s ∼85%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1310 MBit/s ∼81% -5%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324)	1161 MBit/s ∼72% -16%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1150 MBit/s ∼71% -17%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1140 MBit/s ∼70% -18%
Average of class Gaming (450 - 1580, n=71, last 2 years)	1132 MBit/s ∼70% -18%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	718 MBit/s ∼44% -48%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Wireless-AC 9560	644 MBit/s ∼40% -54%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1670 MBit/s ∼100% +18%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1522 (1406^min - 1631^max) MBit/s ∼91% +7%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1419 (1355^min - 1443^max) MBit/s ∼85%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1360 MBit/s ∼81% -4%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324)	1261 MBit/s ∼76% -11%
Average of class Gaming (90 - 1700, n=71, last 2 years)	1177 MBit/s ∼70% -17%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1170 MBit/s ∼70% -18%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	688 MBit/s ∼41% -52%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Wireless-AC 9560	661 MBit/s ∼40% -53%

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1419 (1355-1443)

Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1521 (1406-1631)

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1386 (1331-1568)

Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1622 (1486-1748)

ColorChecker Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q: 20.47 ∆E min: 2.75 - max: 31.42 ∆E

Display - 300 Hz IPS

The matte 15.6-inch display has a native resolution of 1920x1080 pixels. It's a 300 Hz panel that features quick response times. The brightness (327.8 cd/m²) and contrast (1,218:1) meet the ideal targets. Positive: The screen shows no PWM flickering.


316 cd/m²	328 cd/m²	310 cd/m²
335 cd/m²	347 cd/m²	331 cd/m²
314 cd/m²	342 cd/m²	327 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AU Optronics B156HAN12.0

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 347 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 327.8 cd/m² Minimum: 16.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 347 cd/m²
Contrast: 1218:1 (Black: 0.285 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.35 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 1.16
ΔE Greyscale 3.04 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
71.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60	MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 15.60	Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		-3%	-7%	27%	-2%	-9%
Display P3 Coverage	70.2	66.9 -5%	65.6 -7%	99.9 42%	68 -3%	64 -9%
sRGB Coverage	99	98.1 -1%	92.2 -7%	100 1%	99 0%	90.3 -9%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	71.4	68.5 -4%	66.9 -6%	98.2 38%	69.8 -2%	65.4 -8%
Response Times		-65%	-12%	72%	-95%	-47%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	6 ?(3, 3)	12.8 ?(6.8, 6) -113%	7 ?(3.6, 3.4) -17%	2.2 ?(1, 1.2) 63%	16.4 ?(6.8, 7.6) -173%	9.6 ?(4.8, 4.8) -60%
Response Time Black / White *	9 ?(5, 4)	10.4 ?(6, 4.4) -16%	9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2) -7%	1.8 ?(1, 0.8) 80%	10.4 ?(6, 4.4) -16%	12 ?(6.8, 5.2) -33%
PWM Frequency		23810 ?(10)		60 ?(80)	23580 ?(19)
Screen		0%	-22%	2%	9%	-19%
Brightness middle	347	293 -16%	323.6 -7%	385 11%	291 -16%	313 -10%
Brightness	328	270 -18%	315 -4%	390 19%	278 -15%	295 -10%
Brightness Distribution	89	87 -2%	91 2%	93 4%	91 2%	89 0%
Black Level *	0.285	0.29 -2%	0.29 -2%		0.25 12%	0.3 -5%
Contrast	1218	1010 -17%	1116 -8%		1164 -4%	1043 -14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.35	1.69 28%	3.31 -41%	2.46 -5%	1.19 49%	3.33 -42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.15	3.37 19%	5.74 -38%	4.01 3%	3.04 27%	6.25 -51%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.16	1.24 -7%	2.73 -135%	2.6 -124%		1.77 -53%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.04	2.3 24%	2.9 5%	1.39 54%	1.9 37%	3.1 -2%
Gamma	2.35 ^94%	2.3 ^96%	2.29 ^96%	2.31 ^95%	2.216 ^99%	2.51 ^88%
CCT	6658 ^98%	6758 ^96%	6765 ^96%	6395 ^102%	7018 ^93%	6930 ^94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	65	63 -3%	59.7 -8%	98 51%	70 8%	59 -9%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	99	98.5 -1%	91.8 -7%	100 1%	92 -7%	90 -9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-23% / -8%	-14% / -18%	34% / 17%	-29% / -7%	-25% / -20%

* ... smaller is better

Out of the box, the display already shows a great color reproduction. With a Delta E 2000 color deviation of just under 2.4, the target (Delta E less than 3) is met. The display doesn't suffer from a blue tint. Moreover, calibration provides for improvements in terms of color reproduction. As a result, the color deviation is reduced to 1.16, and the grayscales are displayed in a more balanced way. The AdobeRGB color space (65%) is not fully mapped. The situation looks better with the sRGB color space (99%) though.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19046 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The laptop is equipped with a viewing-angle-stable IPS panel. Consequently, the screen can be read from any position. Outdoors, reading the display is possible when the sun is not too bright.

The Blade outdoors (shot in bright sunshine).

Performance - Blade offers a new Boost option

With the Blade 15 Advanced Model 2020, Razer has a 15.6-inch gaming laptop in its range that brings every modern game smoothly onto the screen and also cuts a fine figure in all other application areas. Our test device will set you back about 3,300 Euros (~$3,876).

Test conditions

The preinstalled Razer Synapse software provides options for adjusting fan control as well as CPU or GPU performance. We conducted our test with automatic fan control and the "Balanced" performance mode.

The performance level of the CPU or the GPU can also be set manually. The options "Low", "Medium", and "High" are available here. The new version of the Synapse software released during our test additionally introduces the "Boost" CPU performance mode.

Processor

The built-in Core i7-10875H octa-core processor is from Intel's Comet Lake generation. The CPU runs at a base speed of 2.3 GHz. In addition, the clock rate can be increased to 4.3 GHz (eight cores) or to 5.1 GHz (one core) via Turbo. Hyper-Threading (two threads per core) is supported.

The processor runs the Cinebench R15 benchmark's multithread test at 2.5 to 3 GHz. The single-thread test is run at 3.6 to 4.9 GHz. Furthermore, the speeds are 2.3 GHz (multithread) and 2.2 to 3.6 GHz (single-thread), respectively, on battery power.

We verify if the CPU Turbo is also consistently used when plugged in by running the Cinebench R15 benchmark's multithread test in a continuous loop for at least 30 minutes. The results drop towards the second run and then remain at a constant level. Turbo is used to a small extent.

If the "High" or "Boost" CPU performance modes are selected within the Synapse software, the Turbo speed increases and consequently the results as well. There is a difference between "High" and "Boost".

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1028 (1017.94-1187.05)

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H; Hoch: Ø1211 (1197.82-1369.91)

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H; Boost: Ø1343 (1326.08-1451.69)

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1072 (986.63-1110.9)

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1573 (1544.4-1818.6)

MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1610 (1581.15-1708.45)

Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1002 (974.71-1181)

Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1069 (1047.18-1166.18)

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1056 (1046.13-1175)

CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop

CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop ("High")

CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop ("Boost")

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

196 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1187 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

136.9 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=242, last 2 years)	251 Points ∼100% +28%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	213 Points ∼85% +9%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	206 Points ∼82% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (190 - 220, n=37)	204 Points ∼81% +4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H (Boost)	203 Points ∼81% +4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H (Hoch)	202 Points ∼80% +3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	196 Points ∼78%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Core i7-10750H	193 Points ∼77% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H	192 Points ∼76% -2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H	175 Points ∼70% -11%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Core i7-8750H	168 Points ∼67% -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=241, last 2 years)	2607 Points ∼100% +120%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	1818 (1544.4^min - 1818.6^max) Points ∼70% +53%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1708 (1581.15^min - 1708.45^max) Points ∼66% +44%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1003 - 1833, n=38)	1554 Points ∼60% +31%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H (Boost)	1452 Points ∼56% +22%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H (Hoch)	1370 Points ∼53% +15%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	1187 Points ∼46%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H	1181 Points ∼45% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H	1175 Points ∼45% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Core i7-10750H	1166 (1047.18^min - 1166.18^max) Points ∼45% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Core i7-8750H	1122 Points ∼43% -5%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Core i7-10750H	423 Seconds * ∼100% -13%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	374.7 Seconds * ∼89%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (259 - 535, n=30)	327 Seconds * ∼77% +13%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	285 Seconds * ∼67% +24%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	278 Seconds * ∼66% +26%
Average of class Gaming (91 - 1259, n=239, last 2 years)	234 Seconds * ∼55% +38%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=236, last 2 years)	5816 MIPS ∼100% +7%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	5463 MIPS ∼94% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	5457 MIPS ∼94% +1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	5423 MIPS ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5071 - 5780, n=31)	5360 MIPS ∼92% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Core i7-10750H	5051 MIPS ∼87% -7%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=235, last 2 years)	65860 MIPS ∼100% +72%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	47170 MIPS ∼72% +23%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	46976 MIPS ∼71% +23%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (29844 - 49562, n=31)	43117 MIPS ∼65% +13%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	38249 MIPS ∼58%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Core i7-10750H	29009 MIPS ∼44% -24%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=238, last 2 years)	646 Points ∼100% +35%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	511 Points ∼79% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (430 - 524, n=32)	486 Points ∼75% +1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	479 Points ∼74%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	476 Points ∼74% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Core i7-10750H	470 Points ∼73% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H	434 Points ∼67% -9%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=238, last 2 years)	6139 Points ∼100% +115%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	3843 Points ∼63% +34%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	3801 Points ∼62% +33%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1986 - 4176, n=32)	3455 Points ∼56% +21%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	2860 Points ∼47%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Core i7-10750H	2600 Points ∼42% -9%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H	2384 Points ∼39% -17%

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=234, last 2 years)	1689 Points ∼100% +30%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1352 Points ∼80% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	1347 Points ∼80% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1233 - 1371, n=29)	1304 Points ∼77% 0%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	1300 Points ∼77%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Core i7-10750H	1114 Points ∼66% -14%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years)	11587 Points ∼100% +66%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	8104 Points ∼70% +16%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	8087 Points ∼70% +16%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5715 - 8620, n=29)	7734 Points ∼67% +11%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	6991 Points ∼60%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Core i7-10750H	5242 Points ∼45% -25%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=239, last 2 years)	18.2 fps ∼100% +77%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	13 fps ∼71% +26%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	13 fps ∼71% +26%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (7.27 - 14.1, n=27)	11.7 fps ∼64% +14%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	10.3 fps ∼57%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Core i7-10750H	8.074 fps ∼44% -22%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	53.4 s * ∼100% -11%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Core i7-10750H	53.2 s * ∼100% -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	52.4 s * ∼98% -9%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=235, last 2 years)	50.8 s * ∼95% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (30.2 - 84.3, n=30)	50.3 s * ∼94% -5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	47.94 s * ∼90%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (0.546 - 0.662, n=29)	0.582 sec * ∼100% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H	0.579 sec * ∼99%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	0.564 sec * ∼97% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	0.547 sec * ∼94% +6%
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=235, last 2 years)	0.503 sec * ∼86% +13%

* ... smaller is better

System performance

There's nothing to criticize about the system performance. The system works well and smoothly, and we didn't encounter any problems. The PCMark results prove that the laptop has enough computing power for all common application areas.

There are two memory slots. Memory runs in dual-channel mode.

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4665 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4352 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		6340 points
PCMark 10 Score		5093 points
Help

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9331, n=194, last 2 years)	7264 Points ∼100% +43%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	6580 Points ∼91% +29%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	6053 Points ∼83% +19%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5839 Points ∼80% +15%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001	5522 Points ∼76% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (5093 - 5909, n=4)	5498 Points ∼76% +8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5492 Points ∼76% +8%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	5244 Points ∼72% +3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	5093 Points ∼70%
Essentials
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12176, n=193, last 2 years)	10460 Points ∼100% +15%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	10458 Points ∼100% +15%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	9993 Points ∼96% +10%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	9813 Points ∼94% +8%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001	9478 Points ∼91% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (9118 - 9599, n=4)	9290 Points ∼89% +2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	9118 Points ∼87%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	9109 Points ∼87% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	9042 Points ∼86% -1%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 11833, n=193, last 2 years)	9459 Points ∼100% +14%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	8285 Points ∼88%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	8200 Points ∼87% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	8200 Points ∼87% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (7633 - 8386, n=4)	8106 Points ∼86% -2%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	7954 Points ∼84% -4%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	7641 Points ∼81% -8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	7434 Points ∼79% -10%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001	7000 Points ∼74% -16%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 16424, n=193, last 2 years)	10575 Points ∼100% +123%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	9017 Points ∼85% +90%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	8029 Points ∼76% +69%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	7236 Points ∼68% +52%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001	6887 Points ∼65% +45%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	6690 Points ∼63% +41%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (4747 - 7296, n=4)	6074 Points ∼57% +28%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	4926 Points ∼47% +4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	4747 Points ∼45%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (3570 - 6657, n=41, last 2 years)	5107 Points ∼100% +9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	4665 Points ∼91%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (4375 - 4666, n=3)	4569 Points ∼89% -2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4380 Points ∼86% -6%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	3979 Points ∼78% -15%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	3696 Points ∼72% -21%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	6340 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (5682 - 6370, n=3)	6131 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming (4622 - 7085, n=40, last 2 years)	6003 Points ∼95% -5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5749 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5289 Points ∼83% -17%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	4705 Points ∼74% -26%

DPC latencies

In our standardized latency monitor test (web surfing, 4K video rendering, high-load Prime95), we couldn't observe any issues with the DPC latencies. As a result, the system seems to be suitable for video and audio-editing in real time.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	1877 μs * ∼100% -139%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	935 μs * ∼50% -19%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	905 μs * ∼48% -15%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	785 μs * ∼42%

* ... smaller is better

Storage

Razer has installed an NVMe SSD (M.2 2280) from Samsung in the Blade. The 1 TB model delivers excellent transfer speeds. On the other hand, the laptop doesn't offer any room for additional storage devices.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3238 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2984 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 569 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 510 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1949 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2180 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.98 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 135.7 MB/s

	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001	Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Lite-On CA5-8D512	Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-13%	-41%	0%	6%	-18%	-1%	-2%
Write 4K	135.7	137.2 1%	93.9 -31%	127.4 -6%	158.2 17%	108.7 -20%	118.7 -13%	139.7 ?(76.2 - 229, n=36) 3%
Read 4K	46.98	46.82 0%	46.29 -1%	147.5 214%	50.7 8%	41.4 -12%	52.4 12%	49.9 ?(34.3 - 75.5, n=36) 6%
Write Seq	2180	1221 -44%	974 -55%	485.9 -78%	1790 -18%	1083 -50%	2247 3%	2036 ?(776 - 2975, n=35) -7%
Read Seq	1949	1217 -38%	1425 -27%	1352 -31%	2469 27%	917 -53%	2234 15%	2014 ?(973 - 2639, n=35) 3%
Write 4K Q32T1	510	527 3%	259.4 -49%	476.5 -7%	503 -1%	468.5 -8%	515 1%	461 ?(268 - 656, n=36) -10%
Read 4K Q32T1	569	614 8%	296.5 -48%	531 -7%	579 2%	530 -7%	584 3%	499 ?(289 - 730, n=36) -12%
Write Seq Q32T1	2984	1986 -33%	977 -67%	1061 -64%	3102 4%	3057 2%	2235 -25%	2903 ?(788 - 3033, n=36) -3%
Read Seq Q32T1	3238	3234 0%	1666 -49%	2552 -21%	3413 5%	3422 6%	3171 -2%	3479 ?(2853 - 3568, n=36) 7%
AS SSD		-4%	-37%	-37%	21%	14%	-24%	5%
Seq Read	1950	1832 -6%	1239 -36%	1200 -38%	2979 53%	2341 20%	2021 4%	2553 ?(1938 - 3148, n=37) 31%
Seq Write	2322	1864 -20%	920 -60%	836 -64%	2581 11%	2575 11%	2090 -10%	2084 ?(1248 - 2837, n=37) -10%
4K Read	45.48	52.1 15%	45.74 1%	65.8 45%	47.33 4%	51 12%	47.71 5%	53.1 ?(44.3 - 68.4, n=37) 17%
4K Write	95.4	108.3 14%	95.7 0%	103.8 9%	140 47%	118.6 24%	101.1 6%	131.2 ?(87.4 - 208, n=37) 38%
4K-64 Read	1484	1159 -22%	322 -78%	789 -47%	1710 15%	1637 10%	856 -42%	1477 ?(762 - 2093, n=37) 0%
4K-64 Write	1887	1807 -4%	722 -62%	929 -51%	2188 16%	2442 29%	1041 -45%	1805 ?(1074 - 2152, n=37) -4%
Access Time Read *	0.051	0.05 2%	0.073 -43%	0.103 -102%	0.05 2%	0.066 -29%	0.052 -2%	0.04983 ?(0.032 - 0.087, n=36) 2%
Access Time Write *	0.038	0.034 11%	0.047 -24%	0.045 -18%	0.026 32%	0.028 26%	0.111 -192%	0.04222 ?(0.017 - 0.128, n=37) -11%
Score Read	1725	1394 -19%	492 -71%	975 -43%	2055 19%	1922 11%	1105 -36%	1786 ?(1078 - 2449, n=37) 4%
Score Write	2215	2102 -5%	910 -59%	1117 -50%	2586 17%	2818 27%	1351 -39%	2144 ?(1471 - 2527, n=37) -3%
Score Total	4843	4221 -13%	1654 -66%	2594 -46%	5673 17%	5738 18%	3037 -37%	4826 ?(3309 - 6095, n=37) 0%
Copy ISO MB/s	1903	2083 9%	1236 -35%				2474 30%	2098 ?(901 - 2932, n=23) 10%
Copy Program MB/s	505	496.5 -2%	703 39%				679 34%	500 ?(118.7 - 803, n=23) -1%
Copy Game MB/s	1113	977 -12%	812 -27%				1037 -7%	1132 ?(372 - 1830, n=23) 2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-9% / -7%	-39% / -39%	-19% / -21%	14% / 15%	-2% / 1%	-13% / -15%	2% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

Graphics card

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q graphics core supports DirectX 12 and runs at a base speed of 775 MHz. An increase to up to 1,080 MHz is possible when boosted. Higher speeds are feasible if the GPU doesn't reach a specified temperature and/or energy threshold. In this way, we register a maximum of 1,783 MHz. Our The Witcher 3 test is run at an average speed of 1,174 MHz. In addition, the GPU has access to fast GDDR6 graphics memory (8,192 MB).

The results in the 3DMark benchmarks are at a normal level for the GPU. A slight increase in graphics performance can be achieved by setting the graphics performance slider within the Razer Synapse software to "High". The UHD Graphics 630 GPU that's integrated into the processor is active, and the laptop works with Nvidia's Optimus graphics-switching solution. Optimus can be disabled within the Razer Synapse software if necessary.

3DMark 11 Performance		20888 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		32880 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		17148 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		7683 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=233, last 2 years)	36520 Points ∼100% +30%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i9-10980HK	30309 Points ∼83% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (26292 - 32995, n=10)	29663 Points ∼81% +5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	28997 Points ∼79% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	28900 Points ∼79% +2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	28200 Points ∼77%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	27762 Points ∼76% -2%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H	23326 Points ∼64% -17%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	21861 Points ∼60% -22%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i9-10980HK	141778 Points ∼100% +11%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	127741 Points ∼90%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (101976 - 140750, n=7)	126108 Points ∼89% -1%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 192520, n=167, last 2 years)	121723 Points ∼86% -5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	115893 Points ∼82% -9%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	114009 Points ∼80% -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	112791 Points ∼80% -12%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	106350 Points ∼75% -17%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H	59017 Points ∼42% -54%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=240, last 2 years)	27021 Points ∼100% +26%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i9-10980HK	22836 Points ∼85% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (19655 - 23649, n=10)	21743 Points ∼80% +1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	21479 Points ∼79%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	21237 Points ∼79% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	21121 Points ∼78% -2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	20718 Points ∼77% -4%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H	18166 Points ∼67% -15%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	17419 Points ∼64% -19%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=240, last 2 years)	10727 Points ∼100% +38%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i9-10980HK	8328 Points ∼78% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (7372 - 8979, n=11)	8210 Points ∼77% +6%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	8171 Points ∼76% +5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H (GPU: Hoch)	8074 Points ∼75% +4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	7840 Points ∼73% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	7829 Points ∼73% +1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	7766 Points ∼72%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H	6722 Points ∼63% -13%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	6387 Points ∼60% -18%

Gaming performance

The Razer laptop brings all the latest games smoothly onto the screen. Full HD resolution and maximum quality settings can usually be selected. Moreover, the GPU can also handle resolutions beyond Full HD (an appropriate monitor would have to be connected for this). However, the quality controls shouldn't be turned up quite as high in that case - especially at 4K level.

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 217, n=238, last 2 years)	103.2 fps ∼100% +18%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (GPU: Hoch)	88.6 fps ∼86% +1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	87.7 fps ∼85%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (74.3 - 96, n=11)	85.3 fps ∼83% -3%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	85.1 (71^min) fps ∼82% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	80.3 fps ∼78% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	79.1 (64^min) fps ∼77% -10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	78.3 fps ∼76% -11%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	61.9 (58^min - 69^max) fps ∼60% -29%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	60.4 (49^min) fps ∼59% -31%

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (170.2 - 181.1, n=4)	174.4 fps ∼100% +1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	173 fps ∼99%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	170 fps ∼97% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	166 fps ∼95% -4%
Average of class Gaming (last 2 years)	162.9 fps ∼93% -6%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (27 - 214, n=26, last 2 years)	136.5 fps ∼100% +47%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	108 (86^min) fps ∼79% +16%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	100 (77^min) fps ∼73% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (89 - 106, n=10)	95.8 fps ∼70% +3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	93 fps ∼68%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (GPU: Hoch)	92 fps ∼67% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	85 fps ∼62% -9%

Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (14 - 167, n=148, last 2 years)	114.3 fps ∼100% +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (91 - 110, n=4)	101 fps ∼88% +11%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	91 fps ∼80%

Battlefield V - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	141 (109^min) fps ∼100% +29%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	130 (99^min) fps ∼92% +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (109.7 - 125, n=4)	117.9 fps ∼84% +7%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	109.7 fps ∼78%
Average of class Gaming (last 2 years)	83.2 fps ∼59% -24%

Borderlands 3 - 1920x1080 Badass Overall Quality (DX11)
Average of class Gaming (22.4 - 179.7, n=21, last 2 years)	89.9 fps ∼100% +44%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	70.6 fps ∼79% +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (62.5 - 71.6, n=4)	66.4 fps ∼74% +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	64.8 fps ∼72% +4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	62.5 fps ∼70%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	57.3 fps ∼64% -8%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	53 fps ∼59% -15%

Control - 1920x1080 High Quality Preset (DX11)
Average of class Gaming (45.1 - 187, n=10, last 2 years)	115.1 fps ∼100% +62%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	80.8 (68^min) fps ∼70% +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (71 - 79.8, n=3)	74 fps ∼64% +4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	71 fps ∼62%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	60.2 (52^min) fps ∼52% -15%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	59.3 (52^min) fps ∼52% -16%

Red Dead Redemption 2 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	47.6 (28^min) fps ∼100% +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (40.6 - 45, n=5)	43 fps ∼90% +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	42.4 (25^min) fps ∼89% +4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	40.6 fps ∼85%
Average of class Gaming (last 2 years)	27 fps ∼57% -33%

Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (22.2 - 304, n=13, last 2 years)	173.2 fps ∼100% +20%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	170 (115^min) fps ∼98% +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (140 - 177.7, n=8)	155.7 fps ∼90% +8%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	144.4 fps ∼83%

In order to verify whether the frame rates remain largely constant even over a prolonged period of time, we let the game The Witcher 3 run for about 60 minutes at Full HD resolution and maximum quality settings. The character embodied by the player is not moved during this whole period. A drop in frame rates wasn't found.