Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model 11th Gen Intel (2021) Review: Small Changes, Big CPU Gains

95 W to 105 W TGP graphics. We're only half way through the year and Razer has already launched its second Blade 15 refresh of 2021. However, the updates this time are more substantial than they appear.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! English native speakers welcome!

News Writer - Details here

Even though the Blade 15 was already refreshed earlier this year with 10th gen Intel Coffee Lake-H CPUs and a 360 Hz display, Razer was quick to update the series yet again once Intel made available its 11th gen Tiger Lake-H processor SKUs. The end result is a visually similar model but with several internal updates that enthusiasts and gamers will appreciate.

We recommend checking out our existing review on the early 2021 and 2020 Blade 15 models as this 11th gen version shares the same 360 Hz display, keyboard, and skeleton as its immediate predecessors. This page will focus on the performance differences users can expect between the 10th and 11th gen Intel Blade 15 options.

Our exact configuration with the Core i7-11800H, 360 Hz display, 1 TB PCIe 4 SSD, 32 GB RAM, and GeForce RTX 3080 can be found online for $3100 USD. Other SKUs are also available in different resolutions, refresh rates, RAM/SSD capacities, and RTX GPUs. One option in particular includes the Core i9-11900H to make it the first Blade 15 model with a Core i9 option.

Alternatives to the Blade 15 include other ultrathin gaming laptops like the MSI GS66, Asus Zephyrus S series, Aorus series, or the Dell Alienware X15.

More Razer reviews:

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H (Blade 15 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 - 4.6 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake H45
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Core: 1245 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, 105 W TDP, GDDR6, 471.11, Optimus and manual
Memory
32768 MB 
, Samsung DDR4-3200, 22-22-22-52, Dual-Channel
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 360 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM570
Storage
SSSTC CA6-8D1024, 1024 GB 
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake PCH-H - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headset combined port, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 16.99 x 355 x 235 ( = 0.67 x 13.98 x 9.25 in)
Battery
80 Wh
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Razer Synapse, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.026 kg ( = 71.47 oz / 4.47 pounds), Power Supply: 617 g ( = 21.76 oz / 1.36 pounds)
Price
3100 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89 %
07/2021
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2 kg16.99 mm15.60"1920x1080
86 %
06/2021
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
85 %
06/2021
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg22.85 mm15.60"1920x1080
86 %
06/2021
Aorus 15P YD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg27 mm15.60"1920x1080
83 %
02/2020
Schenker XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
2.5 kg30 mm15.60"1920x1080

Case — Slim and Lightweight with Ultrahigh Performance

Since the chassis remains identical year-over-year, here are the major differences between the 10th gen Blade 15 and newer 11th gen version:

  • Intel 11th gen Tiger Lake-H Core i7-11800H and Core i9-10900H CPU options
  • Higher PL2 (90 W to 160 W) CPU Turbo Boost target
  • GPU has been upgraded from 95 W TGP to 105 W TGP
  • Full support for up to two PCIe 4 NVMe SSDs
  • Full support for Thunderbolt 4
  • Webcam has been upgraded from 1 MP to 2 MP (or 720p to 1080p)

Both USB-C ports support Power Delivery, charging, data, and DisplayPort-out. We couldn't get DisplayPort-out working on our test unit, however, and so we recommend users to double-check this after purchasing.

357 mm / 14.1 inch 244 mm / 9.61 inch 27 mm / 1.063 inch 2.2 kg4.89 lbs359 mm / 14.1 inch 256 mm / 10.1 inch 24.9 mm / 0.98 inch 2.3 kg5 lbs356.2 mm / 14 inch 272.5 mm / 10.7 inch 22.85 mm / 0.9 inch 2.5 kg5.42 lbs355 mm / 14 inch 235 mm / 9.25 inch 19.9 mm / 0.783 inch 2.1 kg4.63 lbs355 mm / 14 inch 235 mm / 9.25 inch 17.8 mm / 0.701 inch 2.2 kg4.85 lbs355 mm / 14 inch 235 mm / 9.25 inch 16.99 mm / 0.669 inch 2 kg4.47 lbs
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Communication

Removable Intel AX210 Wi-Fi 6E module
Removable Intel AX210 Wi-Fi 6E module
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1386 (1331min - 1568max) MBit/s ∼100% +29%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1371 (925min - 1499max) MBit/s ∼99% +27%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1265 (1163min - 1351max) MBit/s ∼91% +18%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1076 (944min - 1117max) MBit/s ∼78%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
MediaTek MT7921
787 (675min - 851max) MBit/s ∼57% -27%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1419 (1355min - 1443max) MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1386 (1274min - 1446max) MBit/s ∼98%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1330 (711min - 1563max) MBit/s ∼94% -4%
Aorus 15P YD
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
933 (498min - 1012max) MBit/s ∼66% -33%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
MediaTek MT7921
878 (827min - 896max) MBit/s ∼62% -37%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014211356136213791342141613991446143814131395143114181419141613351372141913231379140413971372137113961349143313991274127614211356136213791342141613991446143814131395143114181419141613351372141913231379140413971372137113961349143313991274127611081083105011171102110010801086103510971072110710341112106011041062105311159441105110910921093104110591073107710791036Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1385 (1274-1446)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1076 (944-1117)

Webcam

There is still no camera shutter despite the upgrade from 720p to 1080p. Additionally, users can only record at up to 30 FPS with no 60 FPS mode.

ColorChecker
5.1 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
12 ∆E
2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H: 10.04 ∆E min: 2.01 - max: 17.07 ∆E

Maintenance

No major changes to the internals of the 11th gen Intel model
No major changes to the internals of the 11th gen Intel model

Display

Our mid-2021 model comes with the same TL156VDXP02-0 IPS panel as found on the early 2021 model. Most attributes are the same but with one interesting difference: gray-to-gray response times are notably faster on this newer model even after double checking. We're not sure if this was a deliberate change from the manufacturer or if there was a measurement error on our early 2021 10th gen model, but we certainly appreciate the fast response times no less.

G-Sync is not supported on the internal display.

324.2
cd/m²
338.8
cd/m²
333.1
cd/m²
335.8
cd/m²
353.4
cd/m²
345.3
cd/m²
332.2
cd/m²
348.6
cd/m²
345.6
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
TL156VDXP02-0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 353.4 cd/m² Average: 339.7 cd/m² Minimum: 17.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 353.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 1140:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.17 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 1.05
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
B156HAN, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Aorus 15P YD
BOE09B9, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Display
-1%
4%
-36%
4%
Display P3 Coverage
66.9
65.88
-2%
70.23
5%
41.9
-37%
70.18
5%
sRGB Coverage
97.1
96.38
-1%
99.01
2%
62.9
-35%
98.48
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69
67.97
-1%
71.45
4%
43.3
-37%
72.43
5%
Response Times
-143%
-17%
-346%
11%
-115%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
4.2 (2.6, 1.6)
16 (7.6, 8.4)
-281%
6 (3, 3)
-43%
28.4 (15.6, 12.8)
-576%
4 (1.2, 2.8)
5%
14 (7.2, 6.8)
-233%
Response Time Black / White *
10 (5.2, 4.8)
10.4 (6, 4.4)
-4%
9 (5, 4)
10%
21.6 (11.6, 10)
-116%
8.4 (4.4, 4)
16%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
4%
PWM Frequency
Screen
20%
3%
-74%
-4%
-26%
Brightness middle
353.4
338
-4%
347
-2%
268.3
-24%
329
-7%
337
-5%
Brightness
340
334
-2%
328
-4%
257
-24%
321
-6%
316
-7%
Brightness Distribution
92
94
2%
89
-3%
84
-9%
92
0%
85
-8%
Black Level *
0.31
0.24
23%
0.285
8%
0.34
-10%
0.27
13%
0.31
-0%
Contrast
1140
1408
24%
1218
7%
789
-31%
1219
7%
1087
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.17
1.39
36%
2.35
-8%
5.05
-133%
2.78
-28%
3.87
-78%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.69
3.31
42%
4.15
27%
15.43
-171%
4.88
14%
8.09
-42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.05
0.97
8%
1.16
-10%
3.21
-206%
1.63
-55%
1.15
-10%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.4
1.6
53%
3.04
11%
5.5
-62%
2.5
26%
6.1
-79%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.291 96%
2.35 94%
2.35 94%
2.106 104%
2.132 103%
CCT
6830 95%
6626 98%
6658 98%
7392 88%
6201 105%
6891 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
68
65
76
72
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
89
99
99
94
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-41% / -8%
-3% / 0%
-152% / -105%
4% / -1%
-46% / -32%

* ... smaller is better

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

The display is factory calibrated out of the box, but it doesn't seem to be perfect. Our independent X-Rite colorimeter measurements show average grayscale and color deltaE values of 3.5 and 2.17, respectively, which suggests that there may be room for improvement. We're able to push the deltaE values to just 1.1 and 1.05 after calibrating the display ourselves.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.6 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15366 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Outdoors on a bright overcast day
Outdoors on a bright overcast day
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors on a bright overcast day
Outdoors on a bright overcast day

Performance

 

Processor

CPU performance is significantly ahead of the Core i7-10875H in the 10th gen Blade 15 by as much as 20 percent and 80 percent in single-threaded and multi-threaded benchmarks, respectively. The processor in the 10th gen Blade 15 was underperforming anyway and so it's good to see that the 11th gen Blade 15 is back on track in terms of CPU performance. Scores are within single-digit percentage points of the average Core i7-11800H laptop in our database whereas the i7-10875H in the older Blade 15 would be behind by as much as 20 percent.

Upgrading to the Core i9-11900H SKU would likely boost performance by just a few percentage points if our Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD is of any indication.

Performance sustainability is excellent with no fluctuations in scores or clock rates over time as shown by our CineBench R15 xT loop graph below. All benchmarks were performed with the system set to 'Boost' and 'High' via Razer Synapse.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

011022033044055066077088099011001210132014301540165017601870198020901850.481828.741861.761866.111776.591868.811863.411870.031867.851873.891866.981868.721864.451864.711874.061876.521874.851870.31875.031869.771867.411871.171872.661871.351873.011861.761867.241874.331868.631867.151865.851869.951871.081860.721876.71873.711869.861866.021867.151869.861876.961871.261870.991870.31875.121872.481868.371870.121872.41863.151885.991816.781758.631745.21742.161741.631740.951750.321738.831735.061719.841726.671736.191734.531743.831719.691745.121738.681732.431734.451730.11735.581721.841738.831734.152095.122011.162009.651997.12025.521980.11977.072020.711989.361994.221987.782022.352011.261993.922003.411990.842000.31987.782004.912004.911997.11978.531997.11978.531986.291980.11963.381993.921997.12000.31998.71983.141998.72008.032015.931978.921987.782017.551964.931964.932001.72019.182004.911974.041998.71980.22012.781995.512000.31981.672163.452172.612152.972125.292153.322140.32171.22143.392148.462125.062170.262170.262151.122172.972136.072171.082156.572158.892167.92156.572156.452123.032151.3521452139.721850.481828.741861.761866.111776.591868.811863.411870.031867.851873.891866.981868.721864.451864.711874.061876.521874.851870.31875.031869.771867.411871.171872.661871.351873.011861.761867.241874.331868.631867.151865.851869.951871.081860.721876.71873.711869.861866.021867.151869.861876.961871.261870.991870.31875.121872.481868.371870.121872.41863.151885.991816.781758.631745.21742.161741.631740.951750.321738.831735.061719.841726.671736.191734.531743.831719.691745.121738.681732.431734.451730.11735.581721.841738.831734.152095.122011.162009.651997.12025.521980.11977.072020.711989.361994.221987.782022.352011.261993.922003.411990.842000.31987.782004.912004.911997.11978.531997.11978.531986.291980.11963.381993.921997.12000.31998.71983.141998.72008.032015.931978.921987.782017.551964.931964.932001.72019.182004.911974.041998.71980.22012.781995.512000.31981.672163.452172.612152.972125.292153.322140.32171.22143.392148.462125.062170.262170.262151.122172.972136.072171.082156.572158.892167.92156.572156.452123.032151.3521452139.721850.481828.741861.761866.111776.591868.811863.411870.031867.851873.891866.981868.721864.451864.711874.061876.521874.851870.31875.031869.771867.411871.171872.661871.351873.011861.761867.241874.331868.631867.151865.851869.951871.081860.721876.71873.711869.861866.021867.151869.861876.961871.261870.991870.31875.121872.481868.371870.121872.41863.151885.991816.781758.631745.21742.161741.631740.951750.321738.831735.061719.841726.671736.191734.531743.831719.691745.121738.681732.431734.451730.11735.581721.841738.831734.152095.122011.162009.651997.12025.521980.11977.072020.711989.361994.221987.782022.352011.261993.922003.411990.842000.31987.782004.912004.911997.11978.531997.11978.531986.291980.11963.381993.921997.12000.31998.71983.141998.72008.032015.931978.921987.782017.551964.931964.932001.72019.182004.911974.041998.71980.22012.781995.512000.31981.672163.452172.612152.972125.292153.322140.32171.22143.392148.462125.062170.262170.262151.122172.972136.072171.082156.572158.892167.92156.572156.452123.032151.3521452139.72Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H Intel Core i7-11800H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1867 (1776.59-1876.96)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XD Intel Core i7-11800H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1746 (1719.69-1885.99)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM Intel Core i7-11800H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1997 (1963.38-2095.12)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake Intel Core i7-11800H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø2153 (2123.03-2172.97)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
5023 Points ∼100% +7%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4876 Points ∼97% +4%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4711 Points ∼94% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
4706 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (3306 - 5408, n=21)
4504 Points ∼90% -4%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4380 Points ∼87% -7%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
3721 Points ∼74% -21%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3271 Points ∼65% -30%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
2632 Points ∼52% -44%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
2410 Points ∼48% -49%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H
2181 Points ∼43% -54%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
1954 Points ∼39% -58%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
608 Points ∼100% +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points ∼96%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (520 - 584, n=18)
570 Points ∼94% -2%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
559 Points ∼92% -4%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
486 Points ∼80% -16%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
476 Points ∼78% -18%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H
473 Points ∼78% -19%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
473 Points ∼78% -19%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
471 Points ∼77% -19%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
445 Points ∼73% -24%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
436 Points ∼72% -25%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
421 Points ∼69% -28%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
12720 Points ∼100% +4%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12652 (12516min - 12651.7max) Points ∼99% +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
12197 (11396.1min - 12197.5max) Points ∼96%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12195 Points ∼96% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (8447 - 14088, n=19)
11615 Points ∼91% -5%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
11267 Points ∼89% -8%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
10263 Points ∼81% -16%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
6852 Points ∼54% -44%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H
5388 (5332.81min - 5388.31max) Points ∼42% -56%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
5106 Points ∼40% -58%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
1586 Points ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
1513 Points ∼95%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1386 - 1520, n=17)
1483 Points ∼94% -2%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1430 Points ∼90% -5%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1248 Points ∼79% -18%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1224 Points ∼77% -19%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1218 Points ∼77% -19%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
1216 Points ∼77% -20%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H
1213 Points ∼76% -20%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
1147 Points ∼72% -24%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
2184 (2043.84min - 2183.76max) Points ∼100% +16%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2061 (2009.65min - 2060.79max) Points ∼94% +10%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2005 (1921.88min - 2004.51max) Points ∼92% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1342 - 2173, n=20)
1914 Points ∼88% +2%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1909 (1812.99min - 1909.31max) Points ∼87% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
1877 (1776.59min - 1876.96max) Points ∼86%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1728 Points ∼79% -8%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1418 Points ∼65% -24%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
1208 Points ∼55% -36%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
1156 (1010.13min - 1155.97max) Points ∼53% -38%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H
897 (861.83min - 897.48max) Points ∼41% -52%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
794.98 (767.11min - 794.98max) Points ∼36% -58%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
241 Points ∼100% +6%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
232 Points ∼96% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
227 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (204 - 230, n=17)
224 Points ∼93% -1%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
200 Points ∼83% -12%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
199 Points ∼83% -12%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H
198 Points ∼82% -13%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
197 Points ∼82% -13%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
188 Points ∼78% -17%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
187.32 Points ∼78% -17%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
176 Points ∼73% -22%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
174 Points ∼72% -23%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
536.6 Seconds * ∼100% -107%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H
523 Seconds * ∼97% -102%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
450 Seconds * ∼84% -74%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
411 Seconds * ∼77% -59%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
337.2 Seconds * ∼63% -30%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
292 Seconds * ∼54% -13%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (217 - 342, n=17)
277 Seconds * ∼52% -7%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
259 Seconds * ∼48% -0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
259 Seconds * ∼48%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
253 Seconds * ∼47% +2%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
251 Seconds * ∼47% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
231 Seconds * ∼43% +11%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
5795 MIPS ∼100% +6%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5591 MIPS ∼96% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
5480 MIPS ∼95%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (5138 - 5716, n=17)
5478 MIPS ∼95% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
5310 MIPS ∼92% -3%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
5244 MIPS ∼90% -4%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H
5159 MIPS ∼89% -6%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
4839 MIPS ∼84% -12%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4791 MIPS ∼83% -13%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4638 MIPS ∼80% -15%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
4622 MIPS ∼80% -16%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4414 MIPS ∼76% -19%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
57263 MIPS ∼100% +7%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53902 MIPS ∼94% +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
53597 MIPS ∼94%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
52370 MIPS ∼91% -2%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
50075 MIPS ∼87% -7%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38156 - 56758, n=17)
48934 MIPS ∼85% -9%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
46431 MIPS ∼81% -13%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
37625 MIPS ∼66% -30%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
36430 MIPS ∼64% -32%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
33899 MIPS ∼59% -37%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H
29312 MIPS ∼51% -45%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
23493 MIPS ∼41% -56%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
1648 Points ∼100% +87%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1481 Points ∼90% +68%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (882 - 1625, n=15)
1377 Points ∼84% +56%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
1296 Points ∼79% +47%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1285 Points ∼78% +46%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H
1270 Points ∼77% +44%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1203 Points ∼73% +36%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
1202 Points ∼73% +36%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
1141 Points ∼69% +29%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1116 Points ∼68% +27%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
882 Points ∼54%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
9628 Points ∼100% +190%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
8073 Points ∼84% +143%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
7758 Points ∼81% +133%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7522 Points ∼78% +126%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (3323 - 9851, n=15)
7391 Points ∼77% +122%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
6586 Points ∼68% +98%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
6068 Points ∼63% +83%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
5739 Points ∼60% +73%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H
5732 Points ∼60% +72%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
4314 Points ∼45% +30%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
3323 Points ∼35%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
16.7 fps ∼100% +11%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.3 fps ∼92% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
15 fps ∼90%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.7 fps ∼88% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (10.5 - 17.4, n=17)
13.8 fps ∼83% -8%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
12.9 fps ∼77% -14%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
12.9 fps ∼77% -14%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
10.4 fps ∼62% -31%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
9.82 fps ∼59% -35%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
9.1 fps ∼54% -39%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H
7.71 fps ∼46% -49%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
6.93 fps ∼41% -54%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
92.05 s * ∼100% -101%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
73.29 s * ∼80% -60%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
69.2 s * ∼75% -51%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
58.9 s * ∼64% -28%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
57.4 s * ∼62% -25%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
55.8 s * ∼61% -22%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
53.3 s * ∼58% -16%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H
48.2 s * ∼52% -5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
45.9 s * ∼50%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38.6 - 49.5, n=17)
45.3 s * ∼49% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
44.4 s * ∼48% +3%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
0.664 sec * ∼100% -21%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.641 sec * ∼97% -17%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.615 sec * ∼93% -12%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
0.61 sec * ∼92% -11%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.599 sec * ∼90% -9%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.586 sec * ∼88% -7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.58 sec * ∼87% -5%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.575 sec * ∼87% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (0.548 - 0.605, n=17)
0.566 sec * ∼85% -3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.55 sec * ∼83%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.53 sec * ∼80% +4%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.524 sec * ∼79% +5%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1877 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
247 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
227 Points
Help

System Performance

PCMark 10
PCMark 10

PCMark scores are consistently ahead of the 10th gen Blade 15 by double-digit percentage points in many cases. We suspect that the super-fast PCIe 4 SSD is playing a major part here since the benchmark tends to favor systems with fast storage performance.

PCMark 10 / Score
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7356 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (7073 - 7356, n=6)
7218 Points ∼98% -2%
Aorus 15P YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7191 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6865 Points ∼93% -7%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
6465 Points ∼88% -12%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6167 Points ∼84% -16%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5093 Points ∼69% -31%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
11064 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (10271 - 11064, n=6)
10575 Points ∼96% -4%
Aorus 15P YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10528 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10522 Points ∼95% -5%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
9589 Points ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9150 Points ∼83% -17%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9118 Points ∼82% -18%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 15P YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9188 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (8893 - 9564, n=6)
9150 Points ∼100% +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9015 Points ∼98%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8913 Points ∼97% -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
8859 Points ∼96% -2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8422 Points ∼92% -7%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8285 Points ∼90% -8%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10831 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (10075 - 10932, n=6)
10557 Points ∼97% -3%
Aorus 15P YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10434 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9423 Points ∼87% -13%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8582 Points ∼79% -21%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8262 Points ∼76% -24%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4747 Points ∼44% -56%
PCMark 10 Score
7356 points
Help

DPC Latency

LatencyMon reveals no major DPC latency issues when browsing the web or video streaming at 4K. Once the CPU is heavily stressed, however, latency would spike to as high as 4392 μs. We tested this twice with Prime95 and the results are repeatable.

LatencyMon during 4K playback at 60 FPS
LatencyMon during 4K playback at 60 FPS
LatencyMon when running Prime95
LatencyMon when running Prime95
Driver list in order of highest execution time
Driver list in order of highest execution time
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4392 μs * ∼100%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1431.2 μs * ∼33% +67%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
785 μs * ∼18% +82%
Aorus 15P YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
774.6 μs * ∼18% +82%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
545.5 μs * ∼12% +88%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
428.6 μs * ∼10% +90%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

A major differentiating factor separating the 11th gen Blade 15 from all prior models is its support for fast PCIe 4 NVMe SSDs. Indeed, sequential read and write rates here approach 6800+ MB/s and 4800 MB/s, respectively, compared to "only" 3200 MB/s and 3000 MB/s on the 10th gen Blade 15 with its Samsung PM981a.

Interestingly, the PCIe 4 SSD here comes from SSSTC instead of Samsung or Lite-On. Nearly all other Blade laptops come with Samsung and Lite-On SSDs and so this was unexpected to see on our test unit. The Samsung PM9A1 PCIe 4 NVMe SSD appears to be slightly faster than our SSSTC solution.

AS SSD
AS SSD
CDM 8
CDM 8
The secondary PCIe 4 slot sits atop the primary PCIe 4 slot
The secondary PCIe 4 slot sits atop the primary PCIe 4 slot
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
Aorus 15P YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
AS SSD
-30%
-27%
-69%
13%
Seq Read
5738.87
2111.97
-63%
2872.59
-50%
2082
-64%
5375.73
-6%
Seq Write
4201.49
2024.1
-52%
1619.38
-61%
825
-80%
3668.55
-13%
4K Read
53.78
46.53
-13%
57.51
7%
42.41
-21%
56.46
5%
4K Write
179.19
89.68
-50%
149.57
-17%
98.28
-45%
157.67
-12%
4K-64 Read
2959.32
1746.75
-41%
1251.93
-58%
1255.39
-58%
2719.71
-8%
4K-64 Write
1890.84
1962.08
4%
2196.29
16%
737.69
-61%
3365.51
78%
Access Time Read *
0.027
0.052
-93%
0.04
-48%
0.109
-304%
0.04
-48%
Access Time Write *
0.154
0.04
74%
0.082
47%
0.17
-10%
0.027
82%
Score Read
3587
2004
-44%
1597
-55%
1506
-58%
3314
-8%
Score Write
2490
2254
-9%
2508
1%
918
-63%
3890
56%
Score Total
7821
5280
-32%
4869
-38%
3136
-60%
8804
13%
Copy ISO MB/s
3026.55
2127.78
-30%
1582.99
-48%
1390.81
-54%
Copy Program MB/s
1176.69
706.65
-40%
963.8
-18%
644.79
-45%
Copy Game MB/s
2170.34
1470.73
-32%
943.07
-57%
1101.18
-49%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-46%
-40%
-54%
0%
Write 4K
295.6
138
-53%
168.1
-43%
116.95
-60%
230.4
-22%
Read 4K
85.73
47.41
-45%
65.09
-24%
44.56
-48%
91.78
7%
Write Seq
4149
1922
-54%
2124
-49%
1551.63
-63%
4301
4%
Read Seq
4203
1673
-60%
2204
-48%
1682.12
-60%
4474
6%
Write 4K Q32T1
714.8
445.5
-38%
455.3
-36%
497.75
-30%
656
-8%
Read 4K Q32T1
708.7
534.3
-25%
465.6
-34%
436.8
-38%
722.3
2%
Write Seq Q32T1
4681
2976
-36%
2911
-38%
1461.4
-69%
5198
11%
Read Seq Q32T1
6905
3232
-53%
3519
-49%
2363.9
-66%
7065
2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-38% / -36%
-34% / -32%
-62% / -64%
7% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

SSSTC CA6-8D1024
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6905 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4681 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 708.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 714.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4203 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4149 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 85.73 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 295.6 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0345690103513801725207024152760310534503795414044854830517555205865621065554615.626850.286851.746852.796853.636853.636853.846854.256854.256854.336855.36855.516855.86856.146858.656859.496859.786859.996860.116860.116860.326860.536860.626860.746860.836861.466861.586861.586861.79686268626862.726862.846862.846862.846863.056863.146863.466863.566863.566863.886864.096864.196864.36864.36864.826864.826865.776865.876867.02Tooltip
: Ø6815 (4615.62-6867.02)

GPU Performance

3DMark scores are 9 to 14 percent higher than on the 10th gen Intel Blade 15 with the exact same Nvidia GPU (albeit at lower TGP). Thus, users in the market for a Blade 15 may want to consider this latest 11th gen model over the 10th gen one for the minor graphics boost. Larger laptops with the same RTX 3080 like the MSI GE76 10UH can run even faster than our Razer since they are capable of higher TGP ceilings.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Port Royal
Port Royal
Fire Strike (Discrete GPU mode)
Fire Strike (Discrete GPU mode)
Fire Strike Ultra (Discrete GPU mode)
Fire Strike Ultra (Discrete GPU mode)
Time Spy (Discrete GPU mode)
Time Spy (Discrete GPU mode)
Fire Strike (Discrete GPU mode)
Fire Strike (Discrete GPU mode)
Fire Strike Ultra (Discrete GPU mode)
Fire Strike Ultra (Discrete GPU mode)
Time Spy (Optimus GPU mode)
Time Spy (Optimus GPU mode)
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
37604 Points ∼100% +38%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (20538 - 32366, n=33)
28037 Points ∼75% +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
27266 Points ∼73%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-10875H
25113 Points ∼67% -8%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
23373 Points ∼62% -14%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
21479 Points ∼57% -21%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
20831 Points ∼55% -24%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H
20155 Points ∼54% -26%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H
18166 Points ∼48% -33%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
14753 Points ∼39% -46%
Razer Blade (2017) UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
10715 Points ∼28% -61%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
17604 Points ∼100% +72%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (8920 - 13210, n=32)
11019 Points ∼63% +8%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
10250 Points ∼58%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
9768 Points ∼55% -5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-10875H
9023 Points ∼51% -12%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H
7897 Points ∼45% -23%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
7891 Points ∼45% -23%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
7766 Points ∼44% -24%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H
6722 Points ∼38% -34%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5335 Points ∼30% -48%
Razer Blade (2017) UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
3478 Points ∼20% -66%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
16555 Points ∼100% +60%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (8737 - 13067, n=32)
10788 Points ∼65% +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
10365 Points ∼63%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
9649 Points ∼58% -7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-10875H
8737 Points ∼53% -16%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
8052 Points ∼49% -22%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
7683 Points ∼46% -26%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H
7467 Points ∼45% -28%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H
6527 Points ∼39% -37%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5406 Points ∼33% -48%
Razer Blade (2017) UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
3538 Points ∼21% -66%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
50087 Points ∼100% +40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (31288 - 43744, n=30)
38641 Points ∼77% +8%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
35663 Points ∼71%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
33833 Points ∼68% -5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-10875H
32521 Points ∼65% -9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
28678 Points ∼57% -20%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
28200 Points ∼56% -21%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H
26286 Points ∼52% -26%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H
23326 Points ∼47% -35%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
19329 Points ∼39% -46%
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
18891 Points ∼100% +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
18623 Points ∼99%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (13526 - 20233, n=29)
16730 Points ∼89% -10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
15345 Points ∼81% -18%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
14231 Points ∼75% -24%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-10875H
13526 Points ∼72% -27%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H
12937 Points ∼68% -31%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H
11818 Points ∼63% -37%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
11707 Points ∼62% -37%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
11416 Points ∼60% -39%
3DMark 11 Performance
29130 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
55775 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
21544 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
10365 points
Help

Gaming Performance

Performance in real-world games is identical to the 10th gen Intel Blade 15 at worst and up to 30 percent faster at best based on our tested games. Users will see the highest benefits when running undemanding games at lower resolutions or settings where performance tends to be CPU-bound such as in DOTA 2 or X-Plane. More demanding games like Assassin´s Creed Valhalla will see just minor boosts.

See our dedicated GeForce RTX 3080 mobile page for more technical information and benchmarks.

Assassin´s Creed Valhalla
1280x720 Low Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
 
136 fps ∼100% +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
134 (7min - 173max) fps ∼99%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (121 - 134, n=3)
127 fps ∼93% -5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
121 (6min, 71P0.1, 93P1 - 148max) fps ∼89% -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (112 - 126, n=2)
119 fps ∼88% -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (90 - 110, n=2)
100 fps ∼74% -25%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
 
111 fps ∼100% +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (93 - 98, n=3)
94.7 fps ∼85% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
93 (40min, 46P0.1, 63P1 - 122max) fps ∼84% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
93 (51min - 144max) fps ∼84%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (86 - 95, n=2)
90.5 fps ∼82% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
 
87 fps ∼78% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
 
81 fps ∼73% -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (73 - 76, n=2)
74.5 fps ∼67% -20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
 
71 fps ∼64% -24%
1920x1080 High Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
 
96 fps ∼100% +22%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
79 (34min, 37P0.1, 48P1 - 113max) fps ∼82% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
79 (39min - 136max) fps ∼82%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (72 - 85, n=5)
77.8 fps ∼81% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (63 - 84, n=4)
74.8 fps ∼78% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
 
74 fps ∼77% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
 
69 fps ∼72% -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (57 - 64, n=3)
61.3 fps ∼64% -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (53 - 58, n=2)
55.5 fps ∼58% -30%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
 
88 fps ∼100% +29%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
69 (34min, 35P0.1, 41P1 - 108max) fps ∼78% +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (64 - 76, n=5)
68.4 fps ∼78% +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
68 (38min - 127max) fps ∼77%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (56 - 75, n=4)
66.8 fps ∼76% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
 
66 fps ∼75% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
 
59 fps ∼67% -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (53 - 56, n=3)
54.7 fps ∼62% -20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (46 - 50, n=2)
48 fps ∼55% -29%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
199 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (148 - 228, n=2)
188 fps ∼94% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 199, n=19)
178 fps ∼89% -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (151 - 158, n=2)
155 fps ∼78% -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (137 - 195, n=17)
154 fps ∼77% -23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
 
150 fps ∼75% -25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (124 - 161, n=14)
144 fps ∼72% -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (125 - 127, n=2)
126 fps ∼63% -37%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (98.4 - 144, n=4)
118 fps ∼59% -41%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (132 - 205, n=2)
169 fps ∼100% +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (113 - 154, n=20)
136 fps ∼80% +5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
130 fps ∼77%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (117 - 129, n=2)
123 fps ∼73% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (67 - 142, n=18)
111 fps ∼66% -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (100 - 106, n=5)
103 fps ∼61% -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (100 - 106, n=3)
103 fps ∼61% -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (88.4 - 112, n=14)
99.7 fps ∼59% -23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (74 - 89.2, n=5)
82.3 fps ∼49% -37%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (113 - 156, n=2)
135 fps ∼100% +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (85.4 - 115, n=23)
103 fps ∼76% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (90.6 - 108, n=3)
99.2 fps ∼73% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
97.1 fps ∼72%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (62 - 103, n=23)
85.5 fps ∼63% -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (77 - 80.6, n=3)
78.6 fps ∼58% -19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (74 - 81.4, n=5)
77.7 fps ∼58% -20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (67.4 - 87.2, n=15)
76.4 fps ∼57% -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (52 - 67.5, n=7)
61.8 fps ∼46% -36%
GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
186 (2.89min, 143P1 - 530max) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (182 - 187, n=2)
185 fps ∼99% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (164 - 186, n=23)
181 fps ∼97% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (164 - 185, n=18)
177 fps ∼95% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (164 - 182, n=17)
176 fps ∼95% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (163 - 179, n=3)
173 fps ∼93% -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
 
164 fps ∼88% -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (153 - 168, n=5)
160 fps ∼86% -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (140 - 171, n=2)
156 fps ∼84% -16%
1920x1080 Lowest Settings possible
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
185 (2.81min, 143P1 - 490max) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (180 - 187, n=2)
184 fps ∼99% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (173 - 186, n=22)
180 fps ∼97% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (174 - 179, n=2)
177 fps ∼96% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (150 - 185, n=17)
174 fps ∼94% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
 
173 fps ∼94% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (156 - 180, n=14)
171 fps ∼92% -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (124 - 163, n=3)
148 fps ∼80% -20%
1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (175 - 187, n=2)
181 fps ∼100% +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
180 (3.29min, 143P1 - 405max) fps ∼99%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (167 - 182, n=19)
176 fps ∼97% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (153 - 180, n=14)
170 fps ∼94% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (152 - 178, n=14)
170 fps ∼94% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (15