Notebookcheck Logo

SSSTC CA6-8D1024

SSSTC CA6-8D1024 CA6-8D1024

The Solid State Storage Technology Corporation (SSSTC) CA6-8D1024 (formerly LITE-ON Storage SBG) is a high end NVMe Gen 4x4 SSD in the M.2 2280 format. It uses 3D TLC NAND flash with sequential reads specified at up to 6,800 MB/s and write with up to 4,800 MB/s (both using the cache). The MTBF is specified at 1.5 mio hours.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity1024 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced07.07.2021
LinkSSSTC CA6-8D1024

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
53.6 pt (72%)
64 GB eMMC Flash -96%
...
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH -12%
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW -11%
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G -11%
ADATA XPG Gammix S70 1TB -10%
WDC PC SN810 512GB -8%
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK -8%
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ -5%
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 500GB MZ-V8P500BW -5%
Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-A0 -5%
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV1T02 1%
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR 5%
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0) 6%
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW 9%
Kingston KC3000 512G SKC3000S512G 10%
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 12%
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF 13%
Corsair MP600 GS 15%
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB 15%
...
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) 39%
0%
100%
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 1121.04     avg: 1734     median: 1911 (32%)     max: 2170 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 608.81     avg: 888     median: 878 (33%)     max: 1177 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 2208.19     avg: 2526     median: 2344 (21%)     max: 3027 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 4008     avg: 6496     median: 7659 (82%)     max: 7821 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 2211     avg: 2421     median: 2490 (44%)     max: 2563 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 1250     avg: 2756     median: 3431 (94%)     max: 3587 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.032     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.154 ms
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.023     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.031 ms
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 1824.12     avg: 1883     median: 1891 (37%)     max: 1934 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 728.79     avg: 2159     median: 2789 (94%)     max: 2959 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 120.14     avg: 173.5     median: 179.2 (49%)     max: 221.3 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 49.14     avg: 56.7     median: 53.8 (17%)     max: 67.2 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 2671     avg: 3648     median: 4073 (47%)     max: 4201 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 4716     avg: 5402     median: 5739 (58%)     max: 5750 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 118.53     avg: 226.3     median: 264.9 (24%)     max: 295.6 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 55.19     avg: 75.2     median: 84.6 (2%)     max: 85.7 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
min: 4149     avg: 4303     median: 4303 (23%)     max: 4457 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
min: 4203     avg: 4237     median: 4237 (51%)     max: 4271 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 308.74     avg: 547     median: 618 (23%)     max: 715 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 355.65     avg: 574     median: 656 (10%)     max: 709 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 4681     avg: 4863     median: 4943 (49%)     max: 4965.4 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 6905     avg: 6916     median: 6917.1 (54%)     max: 6926 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
306.7 MB/s (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
992 MB/s (15%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 126.7     avg: 194.6     median: 201 (47%)     max: 256 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 52.5     avg: 63     median: 57 (17%)     max: 79.6 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 288     avg: 1519     median: 2129 (47%)     max: 2141 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 843     avg: 2408     median: 3184 (71%)     max: 3197 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 3243     avg: 3738     median: 3804 (48%)     max: 4167 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 3428     avg: 3783     median: 3802 (68%)     max: 4119 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 4658     avg: 4743     median: 4740 (46%)     max: 4831 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 6861     avg: 6888     median: 6883 (52%)     max: 6921 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 4118     avg: 5940     median: 6815 (52%)     max: 6887 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0100200300400500600700800900100011001200130014001500160017001800190020002100220023002400250026002700280029003000310032003300340035003600370038003900400041004200430044004500460047004800490050005100520053005400550056005700580059006000610062006300640065006600670068006900Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.22
log 06. 12:31:00

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 Feb 2023 18:03:16 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.007s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#5 getting avg benchmarks for device 3681 +0.01s ... 0.017s

#6 got single benchmarks 3681 +0.011s ... 0.027s

#7 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#8 min, max, avg, median took s +0.525s ... 0.553s

#9 return log +0.011s ... 0.564s

Notebook reviews with SSSTC CA6-8D1024

Alienware m17 R5 laptop review: All-AMD gamer with great potential, but driver problems

Alienware m17 R5 laptop review: All-AMD gamer with great potential, but driver problems

In the new m17 R5, Dell bets fully on AMD, both for the processor (Ryzen 9 6900HX) and the graphics card (Radeon RX 6850M XT). We take a look at whether the com...
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX | AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT | 17.00" | 3.4 kg
Intel Core i7-12800H debut: Razer Blade 15 laptop review

Intel Core i7-12800H debut: Razer Blade 15 laptop review

Razer is pushing the limits of its 3-year old Blade 15 design to greater heights thanks to Intel's new 12th gen Core platform and Nvidia's mobile RTX Ti series....
Intel Core i7-12800H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 15.60" | 2.1 kg
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model 11th Gen Intel (2021) Review: Small Changes, Big CPU Gains

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model 11th Gen Intel (2021) Review: Small Changes, Big CPU Gains

We're only half way through the year and Razer has already launched its second Blade 15 refresh of 2021. However, the updates this time are more substantial tha...
Intel Core i7-11800H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 15.60" | 2 kg

Razer Blade 15 2022: Intel Core i7-12800H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 15 2022

Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021): Intel Core i7-11800H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT): AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, 17.00", 3.4 kg
   » Alienware m17 R5 with AMD hardware reviewed: Suboptimal drivers unnecessarily slow down strong AMD gamer

Razer Blade 15 2022: Intel Core i7-12800H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.1 kg
   » Razer Blade 15 2022 vs. Blade 15 2018: Four years of accumulating improvements

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Laptop harddisks (HDD, SSD) benchmarks > SSSTC CA6-8D1024 SSD Benchmarks
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2021-07- 7)