Notebookcheck Logo

SSSTC CA6-8D1024

CA6-8D1024

The Solid State Storage Technology Corporation (SSSTC) CA6-8D1024 (formerly LITE-ON Storage SBG) is a high end NVMe Gen 4x4 SSD in the M.2 2280 format. It uses 3D TLC NAND flash with sequential reads specified at up to 6,800 MB/s and write with up to 4,800 MB/s (both using the cache). The MTBF is specified at 1.5 mio hours.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity1024 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced07.07.2021
LinkSSSTC CA6-8D1024

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
46.4 pt (57%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.772 -98%
...
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
43.1 -7%
Fikwot FN955
43.2 -7%
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
43.6 -6%
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
43.6 -6%
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
44.7 -4%
Phison PS5021-E21 512GB
45 -3%
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
45.4 -2%
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV1T02
45.6 -2%
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
46.2 0%
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
46.4
TeamGroup T-Create CLASSIC PCIe 4.0 DL
46.8 1%
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
46.9 1%
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014
47.2 2%
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
47.6 3%
Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-A0
48.2 4%
Acer N7000
48.8 5%
Lexar SSD NM7A1 2TB
49.3 6%
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
49.9 8%
SSSTC CA6-8D512
50 8%
...
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
81.6 76%
0%
100%
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 468.82     avg: 1747     median: 2040.5 (34%)     max: 2605.35 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 420.96     avg: 849     median: 905 (34%)     max: 1177 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 925.36     avg: 2273     median: 2276.1 (21%)     max: 3027 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 4008     avg: 6829     median: 7485 (54%)     max: 7821 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 2211     avg: 2419     median: 2459 (34%)     max: 2566 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 1250     avg: 2986     median: 3369.5 (71%)     max: 3587 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.032     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.154 ms
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.023     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.059 ms
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 1712.38     avg: 1872     median: 1910 (32%)     max: 1944.47 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 728.79     avg: 2379     median: 2766.7 (77%)     max: 2959 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 120.14     avg: 189.1     median: 200.3 (39%)     max: 241.69 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 49.14     avg: 58.7     median: 58.2 (19%)     max: 69.72 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 2671     avg: 3518     median: 3552.2 (31%)     max: 4201 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 4716     avg: 5475     median: 5735.2 (45%)     max: 5770.79 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 118.53     avg: 237     median: 263.8 (24%)     max: 295.6 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 55.19     avg: 73.1     median: 75 (2%)     max: 85.7 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
min: 4019     avg: 4170     median: 4120 (22%)     max: 4457 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
min: 4051     avg: 4152     median: 4125 (50%)     max: 4271 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 308.74     avg: 621     median: 638.1 (21%)     max: 820.6 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 355.65     avg: 677     median: 696.8 (11%)     max: 919.6 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 4399     avg: 4761     median: 4787.9 (32%)     max: 4965.4 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 6752     avg: 6875     median: 6901.9 (37%)     max: 6926 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
min: 306.7     avg: 1251     median: 1251.3 (25%)     max: 2195.9 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
min: 991.67     avg: 1979     median: 1978.9 (30%)     max: 2966.2 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 126.7     avg: 227.3     median: 238 (55%)     max: 280 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 52.5     avg: 63.8     median: 59.8 (17%)     max: 79.6 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 288     avg: 1710     median: 2135 (41%)     max: 2213 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 843     avg: 2780     median: 3162 (51%)     max: 3203 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 3242     avg: 3689     median: 3801 (41%)     max: 4167 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 3428     avg: 3772     median: 3823 (54%)     max: 4119 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 4244     avg: 4578     median: 4614.5 (32%)     max: 4831 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 6810     avg: 6867     median: 6866.5 (43%)     max: 6921 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 4118     avg: 6158     median: 6613.5 (41%)     max: 6887 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0100200300400500600700800900100011001200130014001500160017001800190020002100220023002400250026002700280029003000310032003300340035003600370038003900400041004200430044004500460047004800490050005100520053005400550056005700580059006000610062006300640065006600670068006900Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.28
log 03. 10:55:54

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 12:54:50 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3681 +0.013s ... 0.018s

#7 got single benchmarks 3681 +0.016s ... 0.034s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.719s ... 0.752s

#10 return log +0.003s ... 0.755s

Notebook reviews with SSSTC CA6-8D1024

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 with RTX 4090 Review

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Review: Core i9-13950HX beast with world's first dual-mode mini-LED UHD+ display

The Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 is a new offering for gamers interested in a flagship 16:10 16-inch gaming laptop. Featuring a desktop-class Intel Raptor Lake-HX ...
Intel Core i9-13950HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 2.5 kg
Razer Blade 18 laptop review: Smaller than many 17-inch gaming laptops

Razer Blade 18 laptop review: Smaller than many 17-inch gaming laptops

The spacious 18-inch Blade 18 is marketed as a desktop replacement without the desktop form factor. You'll have to really value the large screen, however, as pe...
Intel Core i9-13950HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 18.00" | 3 kg
Nvidia RTX 40 series Laptop GPU review analysis. (Image Source: Nvidia)

Nvidia Ada RTX 40 Laptop GPU analysis: 175 W RTX 4090 Laptop GPU surpasses a 350 W RTX 3090 in performance and power efficiency

Laptops powered by Nvidia's Ada RTX 40 Laptop GPUs have started to become available, presently with flagship GPUs like the RTX 4080 and RTX 4090 Laptop GPU. We ...
Intel Core i9-13950HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 2.4 kg
Mobile GeForce RTX 4080 debut: Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 laptop review

Mobile GeForce RTX 4080 debut: Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 laptop review

New 16-inch size, new 13th gen CPU, and new GeForce 40 GPU. The Razer Blade 16 takes everything great about the Blade 15 and Blade 17 but for a new 16-inch form...
Intel Core i9-13950HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 2.4 kg
Alienware m17 R5 laptop review: All-AMD gamer with great potential, but driver problems

Alienware m17 R5 laptop review: All-AMD gamer with great potential, but driver problems

In the new m17 R5, Dell bets fully on AMD, both for the processor (Ryzen 9 6900HX) and the graphics card (Radeon RX 6850M XT). We take a look at whether the com...
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX | AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT | 17.00" | 3.4 kg

Razer Blade 15 2022: Intel Core i7-12800H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  Review » Intel Core i7-12800H debut: Razer Blade 15 laptop review

Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021): Intel Core i7-11800H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
  Review » Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model 11th Gen Intel (2021) Review: Small Changes, Big CPU Gains

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT): AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, 17.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090: Intel Core i9-13950HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070: Intel Core i9-13950HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 18.00", 3 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023: Intel Core i9-13950HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 16 Early 2023

Razer Blade 15 2022: Intel Core i7-12800H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 15 2022

Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021): Intel Core i7-11800H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Core i7-11800H

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070: Intel Core i9-13950HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 18.00", 3 kg
   » Nvidia driver 528.49 is borked on the Blade 18 RTX 4070, Razer says a fix should be coming soon

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT): AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, 17.00", 3.4 kg
   » All-AMD Alienware m17 R5 now 36% off in gaming laptop sale

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023: Intel Core i9-13950HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » The mobile GeForce RTX 4080 is 35 percent slower than the desktop RTX 4080 and that can be problematic for consumers

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT): AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, 17.00", 3.4 kg
   » Alienware m17 R5 with AMD hardware reviewed: Suboptimal drivers unnecessarily slow down strong AMD gamer

Razer Blade 15 2022: Intel Core i7-12800H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.1 kg
   » Razer Blade 15 2022 vs. Blade 15 2018: Four years of accumulating improvements

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo