Notebookcheck Logo

2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)

2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0) 1x 980 Pro 2TB (RAID 0)

Two Samsung SSD 980 PRO 2TB (MMZ-V8P2T0) in RAID 0 combination lead to a usable capacity of 4 TB and improved performance numbers. However, the risk of loosing data is a lot bigger (one drive fault can destroy all data). The RAID 0 combination uses two very fast high end PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 2280 SSDs. Both use the Samsung Elpis controller with 8 channels, 1 GB LPDDR4 cache, SLC-Cache and 3D-NAND TLC memory modules from Samsung (V-NAND v6). Samsung specifies each drive with 7000 MB/s read and 5100 MB/s write (SLC cached, 2000 MB/s TLC). The power consumption is between 0.035W (idle) and 8.9 W (max.) and doubled in that case (as both drives are used at once).

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity4096 GB
InterfaceNVMe
ControllerSamsung Elpis S4LV003
Announced30.08.2020

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
62.7 pt (78%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.771 -99%
...
Corsair MP600 GS
52.7 -16%
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
52.8 -16%
Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 WDS100T1X0E
53.3 -15%
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
54.2 -14%
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
55.6 -11%
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
57.2 -9%
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
57.7 -8%
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 Plus 2TB
57.9 -8%
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
58.2 -7%
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
62.7
3x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB (RAID 0)
65.2 4%
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
65.3 4%
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
67.6 8%
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
80.6 29%
0%
100%
AS SSD - Copy Game
1311 MB/s (22%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
442 MB/s (16%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
2844 MB/s (26%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
6635 Points (48%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
2556 Points (35%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
2619 Points (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
0 ms (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
0.1 ms (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
1461 MB/s (25%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
2016 MB/s (58%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
328.7 MB/s (64%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
68.9 MB/s (22%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
7663 MB/s (68%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
5345 MB/s (42%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
327.5 MB/s (30%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
71.9 MB/s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
9867 MB/s (53%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
5266 MB/s (64%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
412 MB/s (14%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
564 MB/s (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
10135 MB/s (68%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
9490 MB/s (51%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
359 MB/s (84%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
73.1 MB/s (21%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
1542 MB/s (32%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
2390 MB/s (39%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
7889 MB/s (85%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
4903 MB/s (70%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
9830 MB/s (67%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
10557 MB/s (66%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
8257 MB/s (51%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0100200300400500600700800900100011001200130014001500160017001800190020002100220023002400250026002700280029003000310032003300340035003600370038003900400041004200430044004500460047004800490050005100520053005400550056005700580059006000610062006300640065006600670068006900700071007200730074007500760077007800790080008100820083008400850086008700880089009000910092009300940095009600970098009900Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 24. 17:24:25

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 21 Apr 2024 17:34:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#5 getting avg benchmarks for device 3823 +0.014s ... 0.022s

#6 got single benchmarks 3823 +0.005s ... 0.027s

#7 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#8 min, max, avg, median took s +0.712s ... 0.739s

#9 return log +0.012s ... 0.751s

Notebook reviews with 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 review: An unusual gaming laptop with a good battery life

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 review: An unusual gaming laptop with a good battery life

A Ryzen 9 6900HX APU and GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU bring all the current games smoothly to the matte 4k screen (IPS, DCI P3, FreeSync) in the 16:10 format....
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 2.6 kg

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX: AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX

   » Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX: Gaming racer with two displays

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Laptop harddisks (HDD, SSD) benchmarks > 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0) SSD Benchmarks
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2022-05-21)