Notebookcheck Logo

Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02

KXG60ZNV1T02

The Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 is a fast high-end NVMe/PCIe SSD for laptops that offers 1 TB of storage. It is available as a M.2 2280 card and uses Toshiba 96-layer 3D TLC flash. As the XG5 series, the XG6 uses the TC58NCP090GSD controller.

TypeSSD
Sizem.2 2280
Capacity1024 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced01.06.2019

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
23 pt (28%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.743 -97%
...
SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N
22.7 -1%
Kingston OM8PCP31024F
22.7 -1%
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
22.7 -1%
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
22.7 -1%
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N
22.8 -1%
Kioxia BG5 KBG5AZNT1T02
22.8 -1%
KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02
22.9 0%
SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N
22.9 0%
YMTC PC005 256GB
22.9 0%
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
23
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
23.1 0%
Acer SSD FA100 1TB
23.2 1%
Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZAL4512HBLU
23.2 1%
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 16GB + 256GB HBRPEKNX0101AH
23.3 1%
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK
23.4 2%
Kioxia BG5 KBG5AZNT512G
23.4 2%
Transcend M.2 SSD 2200S TS512GMTE220S
23.6 3%
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK
23.6 3%
YMTC PC005 Active 512GB
23.7 3%
...
Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
82.7 260%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 396.5     avg: 1110     median: 1110.3 (19%)     max: 1824 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 143.3     avg: 564     median: 563.7 (21%)     max: 984 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 790     avg: 1986     median: 1986 (18%)     max: 3182 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 3297     avg: 3776     median: 3732.5 (27%)     max: 4568 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 1406     avg: 1718     median: 1730.5 (24%)     max: 1869 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 1210     avg: 1386     median: 1331.5 (28%)     max: 1801 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.027     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.039 ms
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.039     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.094 ms
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 1142     avg: 1440     median: 1463 (25%)     max: 1609.19 MB/s
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 896     avg: 1099     median: 1066.6 (29%)     max: 1473 MB/s
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 98.3     avg: 129.5     median: 128.1 (25%)     max: 158 MB/s
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 42.58     avg: 47.9     median: 49.1 (16%)     max: 52.1 MB/s
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 1257     avg: 1491     median: 1330.3 (12%)     max: 2493 MB/s
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 1287     avg: 2385     median: 2660.4 (21%)     max: 2762 MB/s
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K QD32 Write
444.2 MB/s (42%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K QD32 Read
392.4 MB/s (30%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K Write
151.6 MB/s (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K Read
38.4 MB/s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 512K Write
1392 MB/s (26%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 512K Read
982 MB/s (28%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Sequential Write
1765 MB/s (29%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Sequential Read
1188 MB/s (23%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 104.3     avg: 136.3     median: 135 (12%)     max: 181.6 MB/s
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 45.23     avg: 50.7     median: 51.7 (1%)     max: 57.4 MB/s
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
min: 1729     avg: 1869     median: 1844 (10%)     max: 1986 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
min: 1200     avg: 1984     median: 2108 (25%)     max: 2359 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 356.2     avg: 435     median: 423.5 (14%)     max: 509 MB/s
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 388.5     avg: 438.5     median: 429 (7%)     max: 545 MB/s
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 2813     avg: 3019     median: 3066.5 (20%)     max: 3074 MB/s
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 1510     avg: 3016     median: 3282 (18%)     max: 3297 MB/s
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
383.3 MB/s (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
914 MB/s (14%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 114     avg: 129.4     median: 135 (31%)     max: 143 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 45.7     avg: 50.6     median: 52.2 (15%)     max: 52.9 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 350     avg: 442     median: 448 (8%)     max: 514 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 509     avg: 934     median: 1031 (17%)     max: 1167 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 1811     avg: 1863     median: 1833 (19%)     max: 1983 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 2161     avg: 2239     median: 2217 (31%)     max: 2354 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 3024     avg: 3051     median: 3057 (21%)     max: 3065 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 3257     avg: 3291     median: 3294 (20%)     max: 3316 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 2860     avg: 3140     median: 3218 (20%)     max: 3272 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
010020030040050060070080090010001100120013001400150016001700180019002000210022002300240025002600270028002900300031003200Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 17. 13:09:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 May 2025 18:01:23 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3387 +0.014s ... 0.019s

#7 got single benchmarks 3387 +0.019s ... 0.037s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +1.082s ... 1.119s

#10 return log +0.001s ... 1.12s

Notebook reviews with Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02

HP Envy 14 laptop review: Successful all-rounder

HP Envy 14 laptop review: Successful all-rounder

It's not exactly easy to find a laptop with a bright display in the price range below 1,000 Euros (~$995). HP's sleek and compact Envy 14 is among the few excep...
Intel Core i5-1135G7 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8 Review - Mobile Workstation with 4K DreamColor Display

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8 Review - Mobile Workstation with 4K DreamColor Display

HP’s ZBook Fury 17 G8 is a conventional mobile workstation with powerful components. You also get a high-quality 4K Dream Color display, so the ZBook should be ...
Intel Core i9-11950H | NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU | 17.30" | 2.9 kg
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G8 2C9R7EA

HP ZBook Firefly 15 G8 laptop in review: Quadro T500 and Tiger Lake in a 15-inch model

The ZBook Firefly 15 also gets an upgrade to the Nvidia Quadro T500 and a Tiger Lake CPU in its 8th generation. Our review reveals the performance offered by th...
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU | 15.60" | 1.8 kg
HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 laptop in review: Small workstation with faster ports

Less than three months after our review of the ZBook Firefly G7, we already have its successor on our desk. It comes with a CPU from the Tiger Lake generation a...
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 laptop review: Already outdated by Intel Comet Lake and Nvidia Pascal even without a successor

HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 laptop review: Already outdated by Intel Comet Lake and Nvidia Pascal even without a successor

Different name, revised design. HP wants to make its ultrabook workstations of the ZBook Firefly series more attractive with this recipe. But as a result, the A...
Intel Core i7-10610U | NVIDIA Quadro P520 | 15.60" | 1.8 kg

HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng: Intel Core i7-1065G7 NVIDIA GeForce MX250, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » HP Pavilion 14 Laptop Review: A stylish all-rounder with a bright display

Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N30000GE: Intel Core i7-8565U NVIDIA GeForce MX250, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T490 Review: The WQHD HDR panel convinces in the test, but makes only limited sense in an office laptop

Dell Latitude 5500: Intel Core i7-8665U Intel UHD Graphics 620, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  Review » Dell Latitude 5500 Review: A business laptop with many options

Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650: Intel Core i9-9980HK NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 15.60", 2 kg
  Review » Power Overwhelming: Dell XPS 15 7590 Core i9 and GeForce GTX 1650 OLED Laptop Review

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA: Intel Core i7-1165G7 NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA

HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7: Intel Core i7-10610U NVIDIA Quadro P520, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7

Dell Latitude 5500: Intel Core i7-8665U Intel UHD Graphics 620, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 5500

Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650: Intel Core i9-9980HK NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA: Intel Core i9-11950H NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.9 kg
   » HP's ZBook Fury 17 G8 wastes potential

HP ZBook Firefly 15 G8 2C9R7EA: Intel Core i7-1165G7 NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 1.8 kg
   » HP ZBook Firefly 15 G8: Now with more performance but also with higher heat development

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA: Intel Core i7-1165G7 NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8: How much better can an entry-level workstation get?

HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7: Intel Core i7-10610U NVIDIA Quadro P520, 15.60", 1.8 kg
   » HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7: Even new designs can't save Comet Lake laptops

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-03-23)