Notebookcheck Logo

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8 Review - Mobile Workstation with 4K DreamColor Display

Outdated concept? HP’s ZBook Fury 17 G8 is a conventional mobile workstation with powerful components. You also get a high-quality 4K Dream Color display, so the ZBook should be a good choice for content creators.

The HP ZBook Fury 17 G8 is a classic mobile workstation with a focus on aspects like performance, port variety as well as maintenance options. These product category does not follow the current trend towards slimmer and slimmer devices, which means you have to make compromises. You can also tailor the configuration very well to your requirements with a wide choice of CPU/GPU combinations.

Our review unit is a rather powerful unit with a Core i9 processor and the Nvidia RTX A3000 GPU (previously known as Quadro), but there are even more powerful GPUs available (all the way up to the RTX A5000). You also get 32 GB RAM, a 1 TB NVMe SSD as well as the 4K Dream Color display, which bumps the price of the ZBook Fury 17 G8 to around 3800 Euros.

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Processor
Intel Core i9-11950H 8 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, 106 W PL2 / Short Burst, 70 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 1485 MHz, Memory: 1375 MHz, 80 W TDP, GDDR6, 472.42, Optimus
Memory
32 MB 
, DDR4-3200, Single-Channel, 4 Slots, max. 128 GB
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AUOCD8C, IPS, glossy: no, HDR, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel WM590 (Tiger Lake PCH-H)
Storage
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, 1024 GB 
, 885 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake PCH-H - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: SD, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 27 x 398 x 267 ( = 1.06 x 15.67 x 10.51 in)
Battery
94 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 200W PSU, HP Tools, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
2.926 kg ( = 103.21 oz / 6.45 pounds), Power Supply: 630 g ( = 22.22 oz / 1.39 pounds)
Price
3800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89.7 %
02/2022
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
2.9 kg27 mm17.30"3840x2160
87.8 %
10/2021
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
3.6 kg28.38 mm17.30"1920x1080
88.6 %
12/2021
MSI WE76 11UM-456
i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
2.9 kg25.9 mm17.30"3840x2160
12/2021
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg21.4 mm16.00"3840x2400
89.8 %
04/2021
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
2.9 kg26.9 mm17.30"3840x2160
92.5 %
11/2021
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU
2.2 kg16.8 mm16.20"3456x2234

Case - ZBook with unusual quality issues

The bottom panel reveals some uneven gaps.
The bottom panel reveals some uneven gaps.

We are already familiar with the chassis design from the predecessor ZBook Fury 17 G7 and the dark gray chassis works well in professional environments. The stability is good for both the chassis as well as the lid and the overall quality is very high, but we noticed an issue with the fitting of the bottom panel. It is only secured by a lever and a central screw, so it is very easy to remove, but the panel is not perfectly aligned with the rest of the chassis and there are visible discrepancies. This does not really fit the high retail price and it affects the visual appearance. Although it is easy to remove the panel, we would have preferred a sturdier solution with more screws.

HP still uses 16:9 panels and the bezels are pretty wide, especially below the screen. While many modern 15 and 16-inch laptops are going back to 16:10 panels, it seems there are just no suitable 17.3-inch panels right now. Only the Lenovo ThinkPad P17 is bulkier and heaver, but all the other comparison devices are more compact than the ZBook.

Size Comparison

415.44 mm / 16.4 inch 280.81 mm / 11.1 inch 28.38 mm / 1.117 inch 3.6 kg7.86 lbs398.4 mm / 15.7 inch 267.1 mm / 10.5 inch 26.9 mm / 1.059 inch 2.9 kg6.44 lbs398 mm / 15.7 inch 267 mm / 10.5 inch 27 mm / 1.063 inch 2.9 kg6.45 lbs397 mm / 15.6 inch 284 mm / 11.2 inch 25.9 mm / 1.02 inch 2.9 kg6.44 lbs362 mm / 14.3 inch 264 mm / 10.4 inch 21.4 mm / 0.843 inch 2.4 kg5.29 lbs355.7 mm / 14 inch 248.1 mm / 9.77 inch 16.8 mm / 0.661 inch 2.2 kg4.85 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Connectivity - Thunderbolt 4, but slow SD-card reader

You get all the important ports including Thunderbolt/USB-C, regular USB-A ports, Ethernet, HDMI, and Mini-DisplayPort. The ZBook can drive a total of four screens. The space at the rear is occupied by the fan exhausts, so all the ports are distributed across both sides.

Left side: Ethernet, slot for a nano security lock, 3x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (1x powered), 3.5 mm stereo jack, SmartCard
Left side: Ethernet, slot for a nano security lock, 3x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (1x powered), 3.5 mm stereo jack, SmartCard
Right side: SD-card reader, HDMI 2.0b, Mini-DisplayPort 1.4, 2x Thunderbolt 4 (USB 4, 40 Gbps), power
Right side: SD-card reader, HDMI 2.0b, Mini-DisplayPort 1.4, 2x Thunderbolt 4 (USB 4, 40 Gbps), power

SD Card Reader

SD-card reader
SD-card reader

HP still uses a full-size SD-card reader on the right side, and the SD card is fully inserted. Compared to the previous model, however, the performance is much lower and we can only get up to 90 MB/s in the benchmarks, while the ZBook Fury 17 G7 still managed 170 MB/s. In addition to our current reference card (Angelbird AV Pro V60), we also checked our previous card from Toshiba to rule out any compatibility issues, but the results were almost identical.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
188 MB/s +160%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H (AV Pro 60)
161.1 MB/s +123%
Average of class Workstation
  (54.8 - 200, n=17, last 2 years)
95.8 MB/s +33%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK (AV Pro V60)
83.6 MB/s +16%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
72.3 MB/s
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
68.3 MB/s -6%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
205 MB/s +130%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H (AV Pro 60)
172.7 MB/s +94%
Average of class Workstation
  (78.6 - 262, n=17, last 2 years)
133.6 MB/s +50%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK (AV Pro V60)
89.5 MB/s 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
89.1 MB/s
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
86.7 MB/s -3%

Communication

You can upgrade a WWAN module (4G/LTE).
You can upgrade a WWAN module (4G/LTE).

In addition to the Gigabit Ethernet port, you also get a Wi-Fi 6 module from Intel as well as the possibility to add a WWAN module (4G/LTE) since all the necessary antennas are already included. However, HP does not use the latest standards and there are already more modern Wi-Fi 6E modules and a 5G modem would be nice in 2022 as well. The performance of the Wi-Fi module is still very good and we were able to measure transfer rates of more than 1 Gbps. We did not experience any issues with the stability in combination with the Wi-Fi 6 router from Netgear, or the AVM FritzBox 7490 (Wi-Fi 5).

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1440 (1175min - 1571max) MBit/s
Average of class Workstation
  (last 2 years)
1421 MBit/s -1%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1393 (713min - 1475max) MBit/s -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1346 (644min - 1421max) MBit/s -7%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s -19%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
884 (468min - 938max) MBit/s -39%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
767 (421min - 954max) MBit/s -47%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1456 (1371min - 1566max) MBit/s +14%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1400 (636min - 1472max) MBit/s +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1391 (1094min - 1575max) MBit/s +9%
Average of class Workstation
  (last 2 years)
1385 MBit/s +8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1281 (1106min - 1426max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s -2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
579 (368min - 652max) MBit/s -55%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550Tooltip
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1281 (1106-1426)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1439 (1175-1571)

Webcam

The ZBook Fury 17 G8 still uses a 720p webcam. It does its job, but the picture quality is not good even in decent lighting conditions.

ColorChecker
14.4 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
ColorChecker HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA: 10.57 ∆E min: 2.9 - max: 20.86 ∆E

Maintenance

As mentioned before, it is very easy to remove the bottom panel. You only have to remove the central screw that secures the lever and then you can just remove it. Once inside, however, you will find many additional covers, so the access to the actual components requires a bit more tinkering after all. Two of the four RAM slots are also located underneath the keyboard. There is also room for a 2.5-inch drive underneath the battery and the necessary mounting tools are in the box.

It is easy to remove the bottom panel.
It is easy to remove the bottom panel.
Internal layout
Internal layout

Input Devices - Mobile Workstation still with PointStick

The input devices did not change compared to the previous model. The black keyboard is very sturdy (does not flex) and convinces with a very crisp pressure point as well as sufficient travel. Besides the ThinkPad workstations (like the ThinkPad P17 G2), HP certainly offers one of the best mobile keyboards on the market. In addition to the full-size numpad you also get a two-stage white illumination and the keyboard is spill-water proof. We think the small vertical size of the arrow keys is the only real drawback of the keyboard and you have to get used to it.

Contrary to its EliteBook-series, HP still equips the ZBook with a PointStick in addition to the touchpad. Both input methods get their own set of dedicated mouse buttons and they both work well.

Input devices
Input devices

Display - DreamColor now with DCI-P3

Subpixel array
Subpixel array
Only minor backlight bleeding along the edges (enhanced for the picture).
Only minor backlight bleeding along the edges (enhanced for the picture).

Our review unit is equipped with the matte 4K DreamColor display, which still has the 16:9 aspect ratio. Compared to previous iterations of the DreamColor display, where the AdobeRGB color space was covered. The new version “only” targets the smaller DCI-P3 color space just like the Apple MacBook Pro models. The subjective picture impression is still very good, only bright surfaces appear a bit grainy.

HP advertises an average brightness of 550 cd/m² and we can confirm this value after our measurements. The black value is also decent at 0.33 cd/m² considering the high brightness, which results in a very high contrast ratio of more than 1700:1. You can only see minor backlight bleeding along the edges even at the maximum brightness on a dark background, but they are no problem in practice. There is no PWM, only the response times are pretty slow, which results in visible ghosting.

571
cd/m²
599
cd/m²
590
cd/m²
540
cd/m²
568
cd/m²
580
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
539
cd/m²
558
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AUOCD8C tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 599 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 563.8 cd/m² Minimum: 27 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 569 cd/m²
Contrast: 1721:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
86.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
AUOCD8C, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
LP173WF4-SPF7, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI WE76 11UM-456
B173ZAN03.3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
AUOCD8C, , 3840x2160, 17.30
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.20
Display
-23%
-2%
5%
0%
Display P3 Coverage
99.1
67.9
-31%
82.1
-17%
99.9
1%
99.3
0%
sRGB Coverage
100
87.3
-13%
99.3
-1%
100
0%
99.9
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
86.8
63.9
-26%
96
11%
98.6
14%
86.9
0%
Response Times
29%
67%
95%
-16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
67.6 ?(31.6, 36)
39.2 ?(21.2, 18)
42%
17.6 ?(8.4, 9.2)
74%
2 ?(1, 1)
97%
56 ?(26, 30)
17%
Response Time Black / White *
26.8 ?(9.2, 17.6)
22.4 ?(11.6, 10.8)
16%
10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2)
60%
2 ?(1, 1)
93%
40 ?(22, 18)
-49%
PWM Frequency
240 ?(80)
Screen
-189%
-36%
-104%
-33%
170%
Brightness middle
568
361
-36%
419
-26%
353
-38%
573
1%
507
-11%
Brightness
564
334
-41%
416
-26%
360
-36%
586
4%
494
-12%
Brightness Distribution
88
87
-1%
93
6%
96
9%
91
3%
96
9%
Black Level *
0.33
0.35
-6%
0.34
-3%
0.38
-15%
0.02
94%
Contrast
1721
1031
-40%
1232
-28%
1508
-12%
25350
1373%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
5.4
-440%
1.5
-50%
2.45
-145%
1.9
-90%
1.4
-40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.4
9.9
-313%
4.7
-96%
3.75
-56%
4.2
-75%
2.8
-17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.5
3.2
-540%
0.9
-80%
2.77
-454%
0.7
-40%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
6.5
-282%
2
-18%
1.88
-11%
2.9
-71%
2.3
-35%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.23 99%
2.17 101%
2.31 95%
2.1 105%
2.27 97%
CCT
6461 101%
7351 88%
6629 98%
6441 101%
6217 105%
6792 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
77.6
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-61% / -122%
10% / -14%
-1% / -44%
-16% / -23%
170% / 170%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN Grayscale (target color space P3)
CalMAN Grayscale (target color space P3)
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps (target color space P3)
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps (target color space P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker (target color space P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker (target color space P3)
CalMAN Grayscale calibrated (target color space P3)
CalMAN Grayscale calibrated (target color space P3)
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps calibrated (target color space P3)
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps calibrated (target color space P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker calibrated (target color space P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker calibrated (target color space P3)

Another difference compared to previous ZBooks with optional DreamColor displays is that there is no more preloaded DreamColor software, which means you cannot switch the color space anymore. We analyzed the panel with the professional CalMAN software and the X-Rite i1 Pro 2 spectrophotometer. The deviations of the grayscale as well as the colors compared to the P3 reference are already very low out of the box and a calibration by the user is not really necessary. Our own calibration (profile can be downloaded for free in the box above) does reduce the deviations a bit further, but the difference is not big. According to our measurements, the P3 color space is covered by 99.1 percent.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 17.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
67.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 31.6 ms rise
↘ 36 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The large 17-inch device is certainly not the most mobile unit, but the matte and bright display works well outdoors. There is no criticism for the viewing angle stability of the IPS panel, either.

In the sun
In the sun
In the sun
In the sun
Viewing angle stability
Viewing angle stability

Performance - ZBook with Core i9 and RTX A3000

HP offers a wide variety of components for the ZBook Fury 17 G8and you can even get models without dedicated GPUs. You can choose between different Intel CPUs (11th generation) including Xeon chips and professional graphics cards from AMD or Nvidia. The TGP of our RTX A3000 is set at 80 Watts and the device already surpasses the 200W limitation of the power adapter during the stress test (the 200W unit is the most powerful according to the spec sheet), so we believe the optional RTX A4000 and RTX A5000 are also limited to 80W. Basically, we are dealing with the slower Max-Q versions, even though this designation is not officially used anymore.

Test Settings

HP does not implement any custom power profiles or additional performance settings and only uses the regular Windows power settings.

Processor - Core i9-11950H

Our test unit is equipped with the Core i9-11950H, which is the business version of the Core i9-11980HK. There is no unlocked multiplier, but in return the chip supports vPro. The 8 cores can reach up to 5 GHz (or 4.5 GHz when all cores are stressed simultaneously), so this is one of the fastest mobile Tiger Lake chips. The CPU can consume more than 100 Watts for a brief period and levels off at around 70 Watts under sustained workloads, which are good values.

This means the CPU performance of the ZBook is on par with the workstation competition, but Intel’s brand-new Alder Lake processors, which use much more cores, will provide a massive multi-core performance advantage in the next model generation. AMDs current mobile processors provide more performance at comparable TDP settings as well.

The power consumption is limited to 65 Watts on battery power, which results in a performance deficit of around 15% in multi-core scenarios. More CPU benchmarks are available in our Tech section.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H: Ø1949 (1895.02-2129.93)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø2018 (1959.15-2144.43)
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK: Ø2021 (1955.32-2192.14)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M: Ø1771 (1747.11-1845.61)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H: Ø1456 (1429.34-1516.82)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max; Rosetta 2: Ø1687 (1667.29-1693.05)
CPU data Cinebench R15 Multi loop
CPU data Cinebench R15 Multi loop
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Workstation
 
81.2 pt
MSI WE76 11UM-456 -1!
Intel Core i9-11980HK
77.5 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max -5!
Apple M1 Max
73.3 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
71.6 pt
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
 
69.8 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
68.9 pt
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
67.4 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
54.9 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Workstation
  (4332 - 24560, n=27, last 2 years)
15109 Points +15%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
13387 Points +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
13113 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
12876 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (12048 - 13113, n=4)
12394 Points -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
12385 Points -6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
10862 (10718min - 10862.2max) Points -17%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
8802 (8415.48min - 8801.64max) Points -33%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Workstation
  (1144 - 2106, n=26, last 2 years)
1751 Points +7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
1633 Points
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
1613 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (1569 - 1633, n=4)
1596 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
1530 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
1508 Points -8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
1480 Points -9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
1284 Points -21%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Workstation
  (1669 - 9329, n=28, last 2 years)
5730 Points +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
5180 Points +4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
5000 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (4471 - 5000, n=4)
4700 Points -6%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
4437 Points -11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
4250 Points -15%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
3639 Points -27%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
2735 Points -45%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Workstation
  (528 - 816, n=28, last 2 years)
679 Points +7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
632 Points
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
622 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (610 - 632, n=4)
620 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points -8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
568 Points -10%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
489 Points -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
390 Points -38%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Workstation
  (706 - 3625, n=27, last 2 years)
2343 Points +10%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
2192 (1955.32min - 2192.14max) Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
2144 (1959.15min - 2144.43max) Points +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
2130 (1895.02min - 2129.93max) Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (1827 - 2130, n=5)
1968 Points -8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
1846 (1747.11min - 1845.61max) Points -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
1693 (1667min - 1693max) Points -21%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
1517 (1429.34min - 1516.82max) Points -29%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Workstation
  (166.2 - 301, n=27, last 2 years)
254 Points +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
249 Points
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
244 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (236 - 249, n=4)
243 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
231 Points -7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
230 Points -8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
211 Points -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
197 Points -21%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
302 Seconds * -24%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
276 Seconds * -13%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (244 - 261, n=3)
253 Seconds * -4%
Average of class Workstation
  (137 - 684, n=27, last 2 years)
253 Seconds * -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
250 Seconds * -2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
244 Seconds *
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
189 Seconds * +23%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Workstation
  (20087 - 99351, n=27, last 2 years)
60746 MIPS +18%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
53426 MIPS +4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
51402 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (50050 - 51402, n=3)
50504 MIPS -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
49079 MIPS -5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
47264 MIPS -8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
41823 MIPS -19%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
5919 MIPS
Average of class Workstation
  (4777 - 6670, n=27, last 2 years)
5891 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (5755 - 5919, n=3)
5816 MIPS -2%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
5726 MIPS -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
5589 MIPS -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
5444 MIPS -8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
5222 MIPS -12%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
12708 Points +56%
Average of class Workstation
  (5022 - 17487, n=27, last 2 years)
11509 Points +41%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
10081 Points +24%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
8349 Points +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
8152 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
8147 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (7286 - 8152, n=3)
7802 Points -4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
6529 Points -20%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Workstation
  (1474 - 2095, n=27, last 2 years)
1816 Points +12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
1782 Points +10%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
1679 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (1623 - 1702, n=3)
1652 Points +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
1623 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
1557 Points -4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
1487 Points -8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
1317 Points -19%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Workstation
  (5.09 - 26, n=27, last 2 years)
16.9 fps +19%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
15.8 fps +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
14.6 fps +3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
14.2 fps
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (13.8 - 14.5, n=4)
14.2 fps 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
13.4 fps -6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
11.3 fps -20%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
54.8 s * -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
53.2 s *
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
50.7 s * +5%
Average of class Workstation
  (36.5 - 95.2, n=27, last 2 years)
48.5 s * +9%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (38.6 - 53.2, n=4)
48.2 s * +9%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
47.7 s * +10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
23 s * +57%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
0.571 sec * -10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
0.57 sec * -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.569 sec * -9%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
0.545 sec * -5%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (0.521 - 0.551, n=4)
0.54 sec * -4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
0.521 sec *
Average of class Workstation
  (0.3876 - 0.594, n=27, last 2 years)
0.4665 sec * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2130 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
297 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
249 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Workstation
 
95.2 pt
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
93.6 pt
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
 
90 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
89 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
71.6 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G -9!
Intel Core i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
0 pt
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 -9!
Intel Xeon W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
0 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Workstation
  (2619 - 25776, n=27, last 2 years)
15714 KRay/s 0%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
15661 KRay/s 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
15655 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (14407 - 15655, n=4)
15030 KRay/s -4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
12196 KRay/s -22%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Workstation
  (12909 - 109059, n=27, last 2 years)
77642 Points +22%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
64043 Points +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
63537 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (60286 - 63537, n=4)
62116 Points -2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
59301 Points -7%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
4220 MB/s +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
4145 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (4003 - 4254, n=4)
4109 MB/s -1%
Average of class Workstation
  (824 - 4981, n=27, last 2 years)
3469 MB/s -16%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
2945 MB/s -29%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
98443 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
98328 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (97840 - 98772, n=4)
98279 Points 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (26716 - 131931, n=27, last 2 years)
97872 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
93364 Points -5%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
10494 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
10462 Points
Average of class Workstation
  (3105 - 14742, n=27, last 2 years)
10380 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (9828 - 10462, n=4)
10186 Points -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
10168 Points -3%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Workstation
  (6967 - 58181, n=27, last 2 years)
39278 Points +2%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
38635 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
38450 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (35735 - 38450, n=4)
37251 Points -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
30011 Points -22%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (83095 - 147249, n=4)
100296 MB/s +16%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
90742 MB/s +5%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
86791 MB/s
Average of class Workstation
  (19489 - 132156, n=27, last 2 years)
73265 MB/s -16%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
38869 MB/s -55%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Workstation
  (314 - 1472, n=27, last 2 years)
920 MB/s +13%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
839 MB/s +3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
811 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (756 - 820, n=4)
789 MB/s -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
706 MB/s -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
8566 KRay/s 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
8549 KRay/s
Average of class Workstation
  (1473 - 13800, n=27, last 2 years)
8461 KRay/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (7871 - 8549, n=4)
8200 KRay/s -4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
6497 KRay/s -24%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Workstation
  (11898 - 48483, n=27, last 2 years)
35056 MPixel/s +164%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
25908 MPixel/s +95%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (12933 - 26370, n=4)
18803 MPixel/s +41%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
13289 MPixel/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
11531 MPixel/s -13%

System Performance

The subjective performance impression of the ZBook Fury 17 G8 is, as expected, very good, which is also confirmed by the benchmark results. We are, however, a bit surprised by the single-channel memory configuration of our unit with just one 32 GB module. There are four slots in total, so a dual-channel configuration with two 16 GB modules would have been the better solution for the majority of users.

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI WE76 11UM-456
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7023 Points +13%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
6951 Points +12%
Average of class Workstation
  (5488 - 8587, n=27, last 2 years)
6843 Points +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
6430 Points +4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
6212 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
 
6212 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5363 Points -14%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Workstation
  (9151 - 12197, n=27, last 2 years)
10513 Points +18%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
10145 Points +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
10126 Points +14%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9591 Points +8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
8900 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
 
8900 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8059 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI WE76 11UM-456
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9604 Points +21%
Average of class Workstation
  (7846 - 10820, n=27, last 2 years)
9113 Points +15%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
8971 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
8369 Points +6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
7905 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
 
7905 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
7110 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI WE76 11UM-456
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10203 Points +10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
10015 Points +8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
9248 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
 
9248 Points 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (5399 - 13947, n=27, last 2 years)
9196 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
8511 Points -8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
7427 Points -20%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Workstation
  (1154 - 1972, n=26, last 2 years)
1709 Points +15%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1674 Points +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
1586 Points +7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
1483 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
 
1483 Points 0%
CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Workstation
  (1188 - 1842, n=26, last 2 years)
1637 Points +10%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1625 Points +10%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
1484 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
 
1484 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
1361 Points -8%
CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
2102 Points +29%
Average of class Workstation
  (1180 - 2248, n=26, last 2 years)
1889 Points +16%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1783 Points +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
1633 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
 
1633 Points 0%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
MSI WE76 11UM-456
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1513 Points +37%
Average of class Workstation
  (990 - 1865, n=26, last 2 years)
1448 Points +31%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
1107 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
 
1107 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
1080 Points -2%
PCMark 10 Score
6212 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Workstation
  (24508 - 74486, n=27, last 2 years)
57253 MB/s +121%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
47204 MB/s +82%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (25952 - 48565, n=4)
36676 MB/s +41%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
25952 MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
22623 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Workstation
  (25882 - 73331, n=27, last 2 years)
56622 MB/s +113%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
46298 MB/s +74%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (26064 - 47921, n=4)
36786 MB/s +38%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
26562 MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
21933 MB/s -17%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Workstation
  (22240 - 92336, n=27, last 2 years)
61299 MB/s +168%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
45563 MB/s +99%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (22302 - 46818, n=4)
34449 MB/s +51%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
22867 MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
19407 MB/s -15%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Workstation
  (83.4 - 138.9, n=27, last 2 years)
97.3 ns * -14%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
91.1 ns * -7%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (82.6 - 88.6, n=4)
86.1 ns * -1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
85.4 ns *
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
59.7 ns * +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC Latency

Our standardized latency test shows slightly increased latencies with the current BIOS version and is therefore not perfectly suited for real-time audio applications.

LatencyMon Overview
LatencyMon Overview
LatencyMon Drivers
LatencyMon Drivers
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
6610 μs * -604%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5161 μs * -450%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
1493 μs * -59%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1287 μs * -37%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
939 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

The two M.2-2280 slots do not support the latest PCIe 4.0 standard, but the 1 TB SSD from Toshiba (885 GB are available for the user after the initial setup) still manages high transfer rates of more than 3 GB/s despite the PCIe 3.0 interface. Still, many of the rivals are superior in this respect. The additional slot for a 2.5-inch drive (SATA) appears rather outdated, but HP at least ships the necessary mounting kit. More SSD benchmarks are available here.

Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3291 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3046 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 431.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 356.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.95 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 112.2 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 383.3 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 914 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
96.9 pt
Average of class Workstation
 
72.1 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
56.5 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
56.1 pt
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
54 pt
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
 
48.4 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
46.4 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4108 (4076.21min - 4108.28max) MB/s +85%
Average of class Workstation
  (1844 - 4658, n=26, last 2 years)
3246 MB/s +46%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
2419 (2064.08min - 2418.84max) MB/s +9%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
2388 (2192.8min - 2388.07max) MB/s +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
2245 (2233.05min - 2244.71max) MB/s +1%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (2161 - 2354, n=5)
2239 MB/s +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
2217 (2200.33min - 2216.93max) MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2053 (1931.06min - 2052.78max) MB/s -7%
seq write
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4236 (4228min - 4235.95max) MB/s +128%
Average of class Workstation
  (1309 - 7185, n=26, last 2 years)
3581 MB/s +92%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
2755 (2420.1min - 2754.55max) MB/s +48%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
2720 (2204.11min - 2719.6max) MB/s +46%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
2700 (1328.55min - 2699.72max) MB/s +45%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2423 (2406.49min - 2422.82max) MB/s +30%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (1811 - 1983, n=5)
1863 MB/s 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
1861 (1833.96min - 1860.59max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
6274 (5892.58min - 6274.29max) MB/s +89%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
6053 (5002.76min - 6052.8max) MB/s +83%
Average of class Workstation
  (3290 - 7157, n=26, last 2 years)
6125 MB/s +85%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5604 (4075.63min - 5603.92max) MB/s +69%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
3396 (3173.36min - 3395.84max) MB/s +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
3316 (3284.77min - 3315.89max) MB/s
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (3257 - 3316, n=5)
3291 MB/s -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
3223 (3041.71min - 3222.9max) MB/s -3%
seq q8 t1 write
Average of class Workstation
  (2526 - 9243, n=26, last 2 years)
5213 MB/s +72%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
5154 (5111.23min - 5153.51max) MB/s +70%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
5146 (4733.66min - 5145.56max) MB/s +70%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4928 (4907.59min - 4927.89max) MB/s +63%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
3643 (1995.86min - 3643.44max) MB/s +20%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (3024 - 3065, n=5)
3051 MB/s +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
3024 (2822.98min - 3024.34max) MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2683 (2659.19min - 2682.76max) MB/s -11%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
86.4 (85.47min - 86.36max) MB/s +89%
Average of class Workstation
  (44.3 - 92.2, n=26, last 2 years)
63.2 MB/s +38%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
50.9 (43.69min - 50.91max) MB/s +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
44.1 (38.83min - 44.09max) MB/s -4%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (45.7 - 52.9, n=5)
50.6 MB/s +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
46.7 (46.55min - 46.68max) MB/s +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
45.7 (45.57min - 45.65max) MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
45.6 (45.39min - 45.62max) MB/s 0%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
222 (221.05min - 221.86max) MB/s +95%
Average of class Workstation
  (106.8 - 251, n=26, last 2 years)
150.8 MB/s +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
142 (141.3min - 142.06max) MB/s +25%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (114 - 143, n=5)
129.4 MB/s +14%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
125 (124.7min - 125.4max) MB/s +10%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
114 (112.92min - 113.57max) MB/s
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
106 (104.21min - 105.58max) MB/s -7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
102 (100.51min - 101.6max) MB/s -11%
4k q32 t16 read
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3953 (3766.95min - 3953.14max) MB/s +389%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2266 (2247.66min - 2265.92max) MB/s +180%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
2256 (2243.27min - 2255.8max) MB/s +179%
Average of class Workstation
  (577 - 3965, n=26, last 2 years)
1342 MB/s +66%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (509 - 1167, n=5)
934 MB/s +15%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
809 (802.25min - 809.47max) MB/s
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
783 (693.78min - 782.9max) MB/s -3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
769 (682.08min - 768.78max) MB/s -5%
4k q32 t16 write
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3069 (2955.28min - 3069.23max) MB/s +695%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2145 (1812.02min - 2145.19max) MB/s +456%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
1438 (1199.27min - 1438.1max) MB/s +273%
Average of class Workstation
  (332 - 3306, n=26, last 2 years)
913 MB/s +137%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
443 (434.35min - 442.99max) MB/s +15%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
434 (421.48min - 433.64max) MB/s +12%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (350 - 514, n=5)
442 MB/s +15%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
386 (367.14min - 386.1max) MB/s
AS SSD
Score Total
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8461 Points +139%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
5700 Points +61%
Average of class Workstation
  (2512 - 8992, n=25, last 2 years)
5477 Points +55%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5047 Points +43%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
4256 Points +20%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (3297 - 4568, n=8)
3776 Points +7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
3541 Points
Score Read
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3107 Points +157%
Average of class Workstation
  (983 - 26650, n=25, last 2 years)
2725 Points +125%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
2605 Points +115%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1915 Points +58%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
1765 Points +46%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (1210 - 1801, n=8)
1386 Points +15%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
1210 Points
Score Write
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3839 Points +118%
Average of class Workstation
  (742 - 4410, n=25, last 2 years)
2895 Points +64%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2215 Points +26%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
1918 Points +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
1763 Points
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
1722 Points -2%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (1406 - 1869, n=8)
1718 Points -3%
Seq Read
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5414 MB/s +99%
Average of class Workstation
  (2684 - 7437, n=25, last 2 years)
4991 MB/s +84%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
4317 MB/s +59%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
3997 MB/s +47%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
2716 MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2423 MB/s -11%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (1287 - 2762, n=8)
2385 MB/s -12%
Seq Write
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3865 MB/s +148%
Average of class Workstation
  (1352 - 6302, n=25, last 2 years)
3048 MB/s +95%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
2037 MB/s +30%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
1561 MB/s
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (1257 - 2493, n=8)
1491 MB/s -4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1203 MB/s -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
1049 MB/s -33%
4K Read
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
79.2 MB/s +86%
Average of class Workstation
  (43.7 - 84, n=25, last 2 years)
62 MB/s +46%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
48.97 MB/s +15%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (42.6 - 52.1, n=8)
47.9 MB/s +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
44.96 MB/s +6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
42.58 MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
42.24 MB/s -1%
4K Write
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
198.2 MB/s +73%
Average of class Workstation
  (97.9 - 237, n=25, last 2 years)
166.1 MB/s +45%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (98.3 - 158, n=8)
129.5 MB/s +13%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
115.5 MB/s +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
115.3 MB/s +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
114.3 MB/s
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
112.4 MB/s -2%
4K-64 Read
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2486 MB/s +177%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
2160 MB/s +141%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1630 MB/s +82%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
1253 MB/s +40%
Average of class Workstation
  (421 - 2790, n=25, last 2 years)
1204 MB/s +34%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (896 - 1473, n=8)
1099 MB/s +23%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
896 MB/s
4K-64 Write
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3254 MB/s +118%
Average of class Workstation
  (431 - 3818, n=25, last 2 years)
2425 MB/s +62%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1979 MB/s +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
1697 MB/s +14%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
1493 MB/s
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
1473 MB/s -1%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (1142 - 1609, n=8)
1440 MB/s -4%
Access Time Read
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
0.156 ms * -232%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (0.039 - 0.094, n=8)
0.05788 ms * -23%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
0.057 ms * -21%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
0.047 ms *
Average of class Workstation
  (0.017 - 0.124, n=25, last 2 years)
0.04564 ms * +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
0.045 ms * +4%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.028 ms * +40%
Access Time Write
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
0.083 ms * -124%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.017 - 0.092, n=25, last 2 years)
0.04256 ms * -15%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
0.037 ms *
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
0.036 ms * +3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
0.033 ms * +11%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (0.027 - 0.039, n=8)
0.03213 ms * +13%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.021 ms * +43%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

01653304956608259901155132014851650181519802145231024752640280529703135Tooltip
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA: Ø3272 (3251.22-3286.58)

GPU Performance

GPU-Z: Nvidia RTX A3000
GPU-Z: Nvidia RTX A3000

Nvidia’s RTX A3000 is a professional upper mainstream mobile graphics card and the performance is comparable to the consumer version GeForce RTX 3060. Thanks to special drivers, the performance can be much higher in some applications, which is also supported by the SPECviewperf benchmark results. With a TGP of 80W, this is one of the slower versions of the GPU (it would have carried the Max-Q designation in previous generations), which is a bit disappointing considering the bulky chassis. The maximum power consumption of the optional RTX A4000 and RTX A5000 GPUs should also be set at 80W due to the limitation of the 200W power adapter.

Looking at the performance, the RTX A3000 is pretty much on par with the old Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q in the predecessor ZBook Fury 17 G7 in most benchmarks and slightly lower than the average scores for the RTX A3000 we have in our database. There is definitely room for improvements here, but the performance is at least stable under sustained workloads; the demanding 3DMark Time Spy stress test is easily passed.

The TGP is limited to 55 Watts on battery power, which results in a performance deficit of around 25 percent (5000 vs. 6580 points @Time Spy Graphics). More GPU benchmarks are listed here.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
97.7 pt
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 -10!
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
96.4 pt
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
 
75.6 pt
Average of class Workstation
 
71.2 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
70.8 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
60.5 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
59.8 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
41904 Points +77%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (23699 - 27523, n=3)
25737 Points +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
23699 Points
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
23684 Points 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (7432 - 54334, n=27, last 2 years)
23544 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
19437 Points -18%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
29610 Points +74%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
27271 Points +60%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (17034 - 20417, n=3)
19054 Points +12%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
17049 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
17034 Points
Average of class Workstation
  (4816 - 35868, n=28, last 2 years)
16313 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
14627 Points -14%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
11580 Points +77%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
10307 Points +58%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (6530 - 7536, n=3)
7129 Points +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
6764 Points +4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
6530 Points
Average of class Workstation
  (1882 - 16218, n=28, last 2 years)
6389 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
5590 Points -14%
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
157.7 fps +5%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (149.8 - 156.7, n=3)
152.7 fps +2%
Average of class Workstation
  (91.8 - 227, n=26, last 2 years)
151.8 fps +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
149.8 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
139 fps -7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
112.1 fps -25%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
319.2 fps +37%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (233 - 279, n=3)
254 fps +9%
Average of class Workstation
  (48.9 - 551, n=26, last 2 years)
242 fps +4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
232.9 fps
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
225.4 fps -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
185.5 fps -20%
Showcase (showcase-02)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
131.9 fps +57%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (84.1 - 99.9, n=3)
91.3 fps +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
89.3 fps +6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
84.1 fps
Average of class Workstation
  (24.8 - 190.3, n=26, last 2 years)
82.5 fps -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
69.5 fps -17%
Medical (medical-02)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
119.1 fps +26%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (89.2 - 102.8, n=3)
95.6 fps +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
94.8 fps
Average of class Workstation
  (34.5 - 176.2, n=26, last 2 years)
90.2 fps -5%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
81.9 fps -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
72.9 fps -23%
Maya (maya-05)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
250.4 fps +29%
Average of class Workstation
  (77.5 - 449, n=26, last 2 years)
220 fps +13%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (194.8 - 228, n=3)
212 fps +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
194.8 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
172 fps -12%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
162 fps -17%
Energy (energy-02)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
74.3 fps +65%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
45.12 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (41.2 - 45.1, n=3)
43.5 fps -4%
Average of class Workstation
  (7.71 - 109.7, n=26, last 2 years)
41.2 fps -9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
35.33 fps -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
33.98 fps -25%
Creo (creo-02)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
251.7 fps +35%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (186.9 - 235, n=3)
211 fps +13%
Average of class Workstation
  (76.8 - 398, n=25, last 2 years)
205 fps +10%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
186.9 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
170.2 fps -9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
162.1 fps -13%
Catia (catia-05)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
280.9 fps +21%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (231 - 257, n=3)
247 fps +7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
231.4 fps
Average of class Workstation
  (99.5 - 409, n=26, last 2 years)
231 fps 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
210.8 fps -9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
181.6 fps -22%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
208.1 fps +43%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (145.9 - 181, n=3)
168.6 fps +16%
Average of class Workstation
  (61.6 - 284, n=25, last 2 years)
155.8 fps +7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
145.9 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
137.9 fps -5%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
129.5 fps -11%
SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
199.4 fps +35%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
169 fps +15%
Average of class Workstation
  (46.3 - 347, n=27, last 2 years)
156.1 fps +6%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (147.4 - 170.1, n=3)
155.1 fps +5%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
147.4 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
126.4 fps -14%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
114.4 fps -22%
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
309.1 fps +33%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
260.5 fps +12%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (232 - 284, n=3)
256 fps +10%
Average of class Workstation
  (48.5 - 554, n=27, last 2 years)
237 fps +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
232.4 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
186 fps -20%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
181 fps -22%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
58.7 fps +32%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
56.6 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (42.7 - 46.6, n=3)
44.6 fps 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
44.4 fps
Average of class Workstation
  (13.5 - 92, n=27, last 2 years)
43.4 fps -2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
38.33 fps -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
34.49 fps -22%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
290 fps +40%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
270.1 fps +30%
Average of class Workstation
  (86.9 - 460, n=27, last 2 years)
246 fps +19%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (207 - 287, n=3)
243 fps +17%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
207 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
191.5 fps -7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
159.9 fps -23%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
71.6 fps +59%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
67.9 fps +51%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
45.04 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (43.1 - 45, n=3)
44.3 fps -2%
Average of class Workstation
  (6.72 - 109.7, n=27, last 2 years)
40.9 fps -9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
35.71 fps -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
33.85 fps -25%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
139.7 fps +17%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
132.6 fps +11%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
119.7 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (101.1 - 124.5, n=3)
115.1 fps -4%
Average of class Workstation
  (44.5 - 169.5, n=27, last 2 years)
99.2 fps -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
98.3 fps -18%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
88.3 fps -26%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
106 fps +44%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
98.8 fps +34%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (73.7 - 80.5, n=3)
78.2 fps +6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
73.7 fps
Average of class Workstation
  (21 - 130, n=27, last 2 years)
66 fps -10%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
60.5 fps -18%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
59.7 fps -19%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
129.6 fps +86%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
123.1 fps +77%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (69.7 - 103, n=3)
83.6 fps +20%
Average of class Workstation
  (28.3 - 174.7, n=27, last 2 years)
78.7 fps +13%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
69.7 fps
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
64.1 fps -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
59.7 fps -14%
3DMark 11 Performance
20760 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
24449 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15711 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
6490 points
Help

Gaming Performance

Nvidia’s professional GPUs are also well-suited for gaming and the performance of the RTX A3000 is often even sufficient for the native 4K resolution, only very demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 will require a reduction of the details and/or the resolution. The performance is stable in longer gaming sessions, but there is once again a small deficit on battery power; Witcher 3 Ultra on battery results in 43 fps vs. 61 fps on mains. Please see our Tech section for more gaming benchmarks.

Witcher 3 FPS Diagram

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU: Ø61.1 (58-64)
CPU & GPU data Witcher 3 Ultra
CPU & GPU data Witcher 3 Ultra
low med. high ultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 163 150 101 64.3 53.5 49.2
The Witcher 3 (2015) 263 176 112 61.1 45
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 156 131 119 108 77.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 130 86.7 67 50.7 28.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 103 82.1 66.7 40.5
Far Cry 5 (2018) 113 84 81 77 62 36
Strange Brigade (2018) 324 164 134 118 87 51
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020) 78 64 52 45 28 14
F1 2021 (2021) 202 131 114 75 56.7 26.9

Emissions - ZBook stays cool

System Noise

The ZBook Fury 17 G8 is usually a very quiet companion during everyday tasks and the fan murmur is still tolerable at around 40 dB(A) during more challenging workloads since there is no high-pitched noise. We measured up to 47 dB(A) under maximum load, which is very audible, but we did not notice any other electronic noises like coil whine, for instance.

Noise Level

Idle
24.5 / 24.5 / 26.8 dB(A)
Load
41.8 / 47.1 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.431.632.833.135.92535.435.130.535.133.13132.827.429.227.130.14030.832.333.132.830.95028.829.73026.530.16328.929.629.524.127.98028.225.624.421.725.110027.726.82720.524.312529.528.628.12024.816029.126.726.117.520.520032.230.32819.326.725033.733.931.517.820.631532.330.128.315.817.740032.730.829.613.816.950034.532.330.814.417.163033.732.229.513.414.780033.931.929.810.613.8100035.232.729.311.213.8125034.633.429.91113.8160038.436.233.612.116.3200037.934.932.811.514.2250036.735.330.811.414315035.532.628.511.813.5400034.532.129.611.812.4500033.531.126.912.112.4630033.230.525.212.312.7800030.22720.712.312.61000025.322.116.912.512.71250022.519.415.412.612.51600017.51512.911.912SPL47.144.941.824.526.8N5.953.90.60.9median 33.5median 31.1median 28.5median 12.3median 14Delta3.53.32.82.23.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
MSI WE76 11UM-456
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
Noise
1%
-2%
-1%
-3%
4%
off / environment *
24.5
26.4
-8%
24.7
-1%
26
-6%
24.4
-0%
24.2
1%
Idle Minimum *
24.5
26.4
-8%
24.7
-1%
26
-6%
24.4
-0%
24.2
1%
Idle Average *
24.5
26.4
-8%
24.7
-1%
26
-6%
26.6
-9%
24.2
1%
Idle Maximum *
26.8
26.4
1%
27.5
-3%
26.5
1%
29
-8%
24.2
10%
Load Average *
41.8
38.1
9%
43.7
-5%
42
-0%
40.2
4%
42.9
-3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
44.9
38.1
15%
46.6
-4%
48
-7%
39.5
12%
Load Maximum *
47.1
45
4%
47.7
-1%
43
9%
48
-2%
42.9
9%

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

The surface temperatures are completely uncritical even in our stress test where we can only measure slightly more than 50 °C at a few spots on the bottom of the chassis. The top of the base unit including the keyboard deck is much cooler and does not scratch the 40 °C mark, so there are absolutely no limitations. The unit does not really warm up at all under light workloads.

The performance is not disappointing during the stress test, but that should be expected from a large mobile workstation. The processor performance is limited to the nominal 45 Watts after a few minutes while the dedicated graphics card can maintain 80 Watts. Therefore, there is no performance deficit immediately after the stress test.

CPU & GPU data stress test
CPU & GPU data stress test
Max. Load
 38.5 °C
101 F
38.8 °C
102 F
41.9 °C
107 F
 
 33.2 °C
92 F
37.4 °C
99 F
37.1 °C
99 F
 
 24.7 °C
76 F
28 °C
82 F
27.4 °C
81 F
 
Maximum: 41.9 °C = 107 F
Average: 34.1 °C = 93 F
50.5 °C
123 F
52.9 °C
127 F
41.7 °C
107 F
44.4 °C
112 F
51.7 °C
125 F
33.2 °C
92 F
27.1 °C
81 F
27.7 °C
82 F
26.3 °C
79 F
Maximum: 52.9 °C = 127 F
Average: 39.5 °C = 103 F
Power Supply (max.)  50.3 °C = 123 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 38.1 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.9 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-0.8 °C / -1.5 F).
Surface temperatures stress test (top)
Surface temperatures stress test (top)
Surface temperatures stress test (bottom)
Surface temperatures stress test (bottom)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
Heat
1%
-7%
-9%
6%
14%
Maximum Upper Side *
41.9
49.6
-18%
48.4
-16%
45.7
-9%
46.1
-10%
42.3
-1%
Maximum Bottom *
52.9
52.1
2%
56.2
-6%
48.3
9%
57.6
-9%
41.7
21%
Idle Upper Side *
28.2
26
8%
28.6
-1%
35.3
-25%
23.4
17%
23.9
15%
Idle Bottom *
30.7
27.6
10%
31.8
-4%
34.4
-12%
23.4
24%
23.9
22%

* ... smaller is better

Speakers

The stereo speakers of the ZBook offer good sound quality; they are sufficiently loud and rich. It cannot match the audio performance of the MacBook Pro 16, but the integrated modules are not bad by any means. The microphones also left a good impression during our review and voice recordings were very clear without major distortions.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.134.12535.135.73127.132.24032.831.45026.531.56324.132.68021.737.910020.545.81252047.916017.554.220019.360.925017.862.231515.861.840013.860.250014.46563013.468.380010.671.1100011.272.712501173.6160012.168.2200011.568.3250011.467.2315011.869.2400011.870.2500012.168.4630012.367.7800012.359.91000012.560.11250012.653.71600011.946.6SPL24.581.1N0.651.8median 12.3median 65Delta2.25.43130.625.83227.830.434.533.633.534.330.333.333.933.923.931.625.436.92437.822.946.821.852.118.754.917.358.316.663.215.163.214.867.914.170.713.171.212.963.812.66012.858.912.855.812.762.51361.512.857.912.956.212.952.912.746.612.745.926.476.60.936median 13.1median 57.93.27.226.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EALenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025GApple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energy Management - Decent Stamina

Power Consumption

200W power adapter
200W power adapter

The power consumption is roughly comparable to the previous model. We can measure slightly more than 200 Watts under load, so the unit is limited by the power adapter. We are a bit surprised about this limitation, powerful mobile workstations used to be shipped with 230W units. According to the official spec sheet, the 200W module is the most powerful version.

The consumption will level off at around 160W during the stress test, so this is not a big deal, but HP could have used more powerful GPU models (with higher TGP values) with more powerful PSUs.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.62 / 1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 7.6 / 16.7 / 17.5 Watt
Load midlight 117 / 202 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI WE76 11UM-456
i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0), OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, , 3840x2160, 17.30
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048R, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.20
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Workstation
 
Power Consumption
21%
-28%
-12%
4%
20%
6%
12%
Idle Minimum *
7.6
6.1
20%
10.5
-38%
12.4
-63%
5.8
24%
5.4
29%
8.23 ?(6.3 - 10.8, n=3)
-8%
7.75 ?(2.6 - 19.5, n=26, last 2 years)
-2%
Idle Average *
16.7
10.9
35%
18.6
-11%
16.5
1%
14.8
11%
16.4
2%
14.6 ?(10.7 - 16.7, n=3)
13%
12.5 ?(4 - 35.9, n=26, last 2 years)
25%
Idle Maximum *
17.5
12.3
30%
20
-14%
25
-43%
17
3%
16.7
5%
15.3 ?(11.6 - 17.5, n=3)
13%
18.3 ?(5.6 - 47, n=26, last 2 years)
-5%
Load Average *
117
106.3
9%
132.4
-13%
132
-13%
120.4
-3%
94
20%
109.3 ?(99.3 - 117, n=3)
7%
96.4 ?(47.7 - 182, n=26, last 2 years)
18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
150
124
17%
232
-55%
132
12%
168.4
-12%
104
31%
Load Maximum *
202
168.9
16%
281.6
-39%
134
34%
199.8
1%
135
33%
196.5 ?(177.4 - 210, n=3)
3%
157.6 ?(60.2 - 311, n=26, last 2 years)
22%

* ... smaller is better

Energieaufnahme Witcher 3 / Stresstest

0153045607590105120135150165180195Tooltip
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø150.5 (147-155)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø176.2 (156-202)

Power Consumption external screen

0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø109.3 (106-134)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø124.8 (103-138)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø134.5 (131-145)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø137.1 (132-148)

Battery Runtime

Charging
Charging

Despite the 4K panel, the 94 Wh battery manages decent runtimes. At an adjusted brightness of 150 nits (44 % in the case of our test unit) our video test runs for 8.5 hours and our Wi-Fi test for 7.5 hours. The Wi-Fi runtime drops to little more than 5 hours when we repeat the test with the maximum display brightness.

The battery is empty after about 2 hours when you really stress the device and a full charge takes 113 minutes when the device is turned on. 50% of the capacity is recharged after about 35 minutes.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 96)
7h 25min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 97)
5h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 29min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 59min
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, 94 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 94 Wh
MSI WE76 11UM-456
i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, 94 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh
Average of class Workstation
 
Battery Runtime
5%
-23%
-56%
3%
52%
8%
H.264
509
568
12%
413
-19%
106
-79%
615
21%
1021
101%
693 ?(347 - 1104, n=10, last 2 years)
36%
WiFi v1.3
445
588
32%
377
-15%
301
-32%
455
2%
894
101%
533 ?(252 - 897, n=26, last 2 years)
20%
Load
119
84
-29%
79
-34%
104
-13%
63
-47%
79.6 ?(54 - 118, n=16, last 2 years)
-33%
Witcher 3 ultra
94

Pros

+ sturdy chassis
+ very good performance utilization
+ very good input devices
+ 4K DreamColor display with accurate colors
+ plenty of ports
+ easy access to the internals...

Cons

- ...which is affected by additional covers
- SD reader is slower than before
- review configuration with single-channel RAM
- bad webcam

Verdict - The ZBook Fury 17 needs a refresh

In review: HP ZBook Fury 17 G8. Test model courtesy of HP Germany.
In review: HP ZBook Fury 17 G8. Test model courtesy of HP Germany.

The ZBook Fury 17 G8 appear slightly dated at some points. You get modern CPUs and GPUs, but a 2.5-inch slot for hard drives is pretty rare these days. You do not get the latest communication modules, either (no Wi-Fi 6E, no 5G) and there is still a 720p webcam as well as the 16:9 aspect ratio including wide bezels.

We are also a bit surprised that the components do not offer more performance. If you get such a “classic” mobile workstation with a comparatively heavy and bulky chassis, you usually want the highest performance possible. Due to the limitation to the 200W power adapter, however, the manufacturer limits itself unnecessarily and the cooling solution could certainly handle more. The performance is at least stable. If you need more CPU performance, we recommend you wait for the next generation with promises a major leap thanks to Intel’s new Alder Lake chips with much more CPU cores.

Decent performance utilization and moderate emissions: The ZBook Fury 17 G8 is a solid mobile workstation, but HP is pretty conservative in terms of the GPU performance. Considering the bulky chassis, there could be more powerful GPU versions.

The current DreamColor versions still offer very good picture quality. They do not cover AdobeRGB anymore, but “only” the DCI-P3 reference similar to the MacBook Pro models from Apple. If you work with a lot of HDR contents, you should consider the current MacBooks since they manage much higher peak brightness thanks to the Mini-LED technology.

The idea with the large maintenance cover is good, but the mechanism should not affect the quality impression, which is the case on our test unit. You should be able to expect flawless build quality and even gaps for a price of almost 4000 Euros. The easy access to the components is also affected by the additional covers for the individual components.

If you are not willing to make compromises in terms of GPU performance, you should have a look at the MSI WE76 (155W TGP), while the ThinkPad P17 G2 is very comparable to the ZBook in many respects, but still has the slight edge in terms of keyboard quality. Looking at the development of other ThinkPad keyboard, however, this might change soon.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Price and Availability

You can customize the ZBook Fury 17 G8 on HP's website. A configuration similar to our test unit is available for $4942 with a shipping date in May.

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA - 02/16/2022 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
91%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
69 / 80 → 86%
Weight
57 / 10-66 → 84%
Battery
77 / 95 → 81%
Display
94%
Games Performance
92%
Application Performance
93%
Temperature
86 / 95 → 91%
Noise
86 / 90 → 95%
Audio
87%
Camera
29 / 85 → 34%
Average
81%
90%
Workstation - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 7 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > HP ZBook Fury 17 G8 Review - Mobile Workstation with 4K DreamColor Display
Andreas Osthoff, 2022-02-16 (Update: 2022-02-16)