Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 review: A lot of power and a great 4K display in a more compact package

29% smaller. In its HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 mobile workstation, HP crammed more performance into a more compact case. The 119W5EA configuration delivers a lot of power in the test, and also convinces with a great 4K DreamColor display and numerous connections.
Marcus Schwarten, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by Mark Riege), 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

In the current G7 generation of the ZBook Fury workstation, HP uses faster hardware in a smaller case. We already made a similar observation in the test of the smaller HP ZBook Fury 15 G7, and now we are also seeing it in the large ZBook Fury 17 G7. With the 119W5EA model, we are testing one of the top configurations with an Intel Core i9-10885H, Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, and 32 GB of DDR4 RAM. All this is packaged in a case that is almost 30% smaller and also weighs less than its comparable competitors.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA (ZBook Fury 17 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-10885H 8 x 2.4 GHz, 125 W PL2 / Short Burst, 74 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 1560 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, 80 W TDP, GDDR6
Memory
32768 MB 
, DDR4
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AUOCD8C, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel WM490 (Comet Lake PCH-H)
Storage
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, 1024 GB 
, 891 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: audio combo port, Card Reader: SD, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Comet Lake PCH-LP - I219-V gBE (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 26.9 x 398.4 x 267.1 ( = 1.06 x 15.69 x 10.52 in)
Battery
94 Wh, HP Long Life Li-Ion-Polymer battery
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix HD IR camera
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard Light: yes, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
2.922 kg ( = 103.07 oz / 6.44 pounds), Power Supply: 637 g ( = 22.47 oz / 1.4 pounds)
Price
4800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89.8 %
04/2021
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
2.9 kg26.9 mm17.30"3840x2160
88.2 %
01/2021
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
i9-9880H, Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
3.5 kg31 mm17.30"3840x2160
90.2 %
01/2021
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
W-10885M, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
2.4 kg25.9 mm15.60"3840x2160
88.4 %
11/2020
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
E-2276M, Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
2.9 kg28.2 mm17.00"1920x1200
87.8 %
08/2020
Dell Precision 7550
W-10885M, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
2.8 kg27.36 mm15.60"3840x2160

Case: Angular and high-quality

As you would expect in this price class, the HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 shows a flawless quality. The even clearances are evidence of accurate workmanship. The angular case not only looks elegant and offers a high-quality feel, but it is also robust (conforming to MIL STD 810H).

The hinge offers ample resistance that is high enough to create a stable position, but also not too high, allowing you to open the laptop with one hand. In this, the heavy base of the case also plays a role. The thickness of the case stiffens it, making it resistant to attempts of warping and allowing you to hold it up by a single corner.

HP specifies that the new HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 is 29% more compact than its predecessor, while still being more powerful. However, even if the device just went through a slimming diet, it is still fairly thick (as expected). But if you look at other 17.3-inch workstations such as the Lenovo ThinkPad P73, this is all relative: at a height of almost 2.7 cm (~1.1 in) and width and depth of 40 x 26.7 cm (~15.7 x 10.5 in), HP's new workstation is significantly more compact. And at 2.9 kg (~6.4 lb), it also weighs more than half a kg less (~1.1 lb).

But of course, 2.9 kg (~6.4 lb) still is a significant weight and not comparable to "regular" 17-inch laptops such as the Acer Aspire 5 we recently tested. However, in contrast to its slim peers, the device is not designed primarily for mobile usage but for stationary use instead. To place it on your lap for streaming in the evening or take it with you on a trip requires some effort. But those who are interested in a powerful workstation would know this anyways. 

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Size Comparison

416 mm / 16.4 inch 281 mm / 11.1 inch 31 mm / 1.22 inch 3.5 kg7.7 lbs398.4 mm / 15.7 inch 267.1 mm / 10.5 inch 26.9 mm / 1.059 inch 2.9 kg6.44 lbs382 mm / 15 inch 265 mm / 10.4 inch 28.2 mm / 1.11 inch 2.9 kg6.47 lbs360 mm / 14.2 inch 242 mm / 9.53 inch 27.36 mm / 1.077 inch 2.8 kg6.23 lbs357 mm / 14.1 inch 242.5 mm / 9.55 inch 25.9 mm / 1.02 inch 2.4 kg5.37 lbs

Equipment: More would hardly be possible

The numerous connections of the HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 are spread across the left and right side of the case, as is typical for laptops. Only very few users should miss anything here, since all the important connections such as USB-C including Thunderbolt 3 are available. In addition, there is another Mini DisplayPort 1.4 and an HDMI 2.0b port for connecting external monitors. All the connections are easily accessible and placed with sufficient distance in between.

Right: 1x power, 1x Mini DisplayPort 1.4, 1x HDMI 2.0b, 2x Thunderbolt 3
Right: 1x power, 1x Mini DisplayPort 1.4, 1x HDMI 2.0b, 2x Thunderbolt 3
Left: 1x LAN (RJ-45), 3x USB 3.1 Gen 1 (1x with charging function), 1x headphones/microphone combo
Left: 1x LAN (RJ-45), 3x USB 3.1 Gen 1 (1x with charging function), 1x headphones/microphone combo

SD Card Reader

The integrated card reader for SD storage cards performs slightly slower than the competitors in our test with an AV Pro 60 storage card. But overall, the performance is slightly above the average of workstations in this class, so it is good.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Precision 7550
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
188.2 MB/s ∼100% +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
185 MB/s ∼98% +15%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
172 MB/s ∼91% +7%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
170 MB/s ∼90% +6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
  (AV Pro 60)
161.1 MB/s ∼86%
Average of class Workstation
  (60.6 - 220, n=26, last 2 years)
134 MB/s ∼71% -17%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
239.1 MB/s ∼100% +38%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
206.5 MB/s ∼86% +20%
Dell Precision 7550
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
196.4 MB/s ∼82% +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
193.5 MB/s ∼81% +12%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
  (AV Pro 60)
172.7 MB/s ∼72%
Average of class Workstation
  (83.7 - 244, n=25, last 2 years)
152 MB/s ∼64% -12%

Communication

An even better picture is presented in the WLAN connectivity, where our test unit performs extraordinarily well and is only surpassed by the Lenovo ThinkPad P73. The values are above those of the other comparison devices and above the average of other laptops that are equipped with the Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201. So HP gets a lot of performance from the WLAN module with Wi-Fi 6, and the HP ZBook Fury 15 G7, which is equipped with the same model, only achieves data rates that are half as high.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1509 (1412min - 1561max) MBit/s ∼100% +12%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1346 (644min - 1421max) MBit/s ∼89%
Average of class Workstation
  (646 - 1595, n=33, last 2 years)
1192 MBit/s ∼79% -11%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=287)
1157 MBit/s ∼77% -14%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1011 (507min - 1065max) MBit/s ∼67% -25%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1008 (770min - 1197max) MBit/s ∼67% -25%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
843 (792min - 896max) MBit/s ∼56% -37%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1490 (1399min - 1630max) MBit/s ∼100% +6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1400 (636min - 1472max) MBit/s ∼94%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1316 (579min - 1479max) MBit/s ∼88% -6%
Average of class Workstation
  (579 - 1553, n=33, last 2 years)
1285 MBit/s ∼86% -8%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1263 (911min - 1354max) MBit/s ∼85% -10%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=287)
1253 MBit/s ∼84% -10%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
876 (448min - 896max) MBit/s ∼59% -37%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600636124714261380139514171423145614561402137014311412131614261472140713031410141013751469143214561467140314151328135814621562159614971500146614651508149416301504139915111477141714801494150314551510147915131448148514651447149615131466140314954488748688868788768838908968608838668778708788738608808848598788508478748968668888728648931280128712501280126912601292127612851265126512761270131712921261126612791290126313241302128611289111199130912971269135486391286485280757912221404143614751459147914691442143914511469136113701478146214681467144914721457147314721429147663612471426138013951417142314561456140213701431141213161426147214071303141014101375146914321456146714031415132813581462156215961497150014661465150814941630150413991511147714171480149415031455151014791513144814851465144714961513146614031495448874868886878876883890896860883866877870878873860880884859878850847874896866888872864893128012871250128012691260129212761285126512651276127013171292126112661279129012631324130212861128911119913091297126913548639128648528075791222140414361475145914791469144214391451146913611370147814621468146714491472145714731472142914766441384132113501393132313791307136014211383136113751350115913441316137613111402140813241390140012621324136313491339134114991528150715061484154715391526152315311483156115261487149015011527148915231483151415201412154115361521148314741516150584986684184984983083888184083080784283885482782186281684588980389685287181986084679283585411531144111196611301197100511309179101068106685510577701093105310631091963978856100610778198961086985977808507100289281599799098191710131038100410651033100810411049103910321049996105510481014104010491042104110311026997Tooltip
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1379 (636-1472)
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1489 (1399-1630)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø861 (448-896)
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1263 (911-1354)
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1315 (579-1479)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1325 (644-1421)
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1509 (1412-1561)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø843 (792-896)
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1008 (770-1197)
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø994 (507-1065)

Webcam

HP has placed a 720p webcam in the center above the display. While it does its job and is sufficient for video conferencing, we would have liked a better quality in a device of this price class. A positive aspect is that the camera can be locked behind a physical slider. 

ColorChecker
22.3 ∆E
23 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
16 ∆E
26 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
16 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA: 15.53 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 25.95 ∆E

Security

In addition to a whole suite of security management software, the workstation also offers a Kensington Lock as well as a fingerprint sensor below the number block on the right. 

Accessories

In addition to the usual paperwork, the box includes a slim smart charger that offers 200 watts, weighs 600 g (~1.3 lb), and has a cable that is surrounded by fabric. HP also offers numerous optional accessories.

Maintenance

You can unlock the bottom of the case using a slider and then simply remove it. In this way, not only do you get access to the two large fans, but the SSD and RAM can also be replaced. However, you will need a screwdriver to do that. The battery can also be replaced simply.

Access is easy
Access is easy
The two fans on the left and right side on top
The two fans on the left and right side on top
Modules can be replaced easily
Modules can be replaced easily

Warranty

HP offers a limited three-year warranty on parts and labor for the HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 mobile workstation. You can also purchase additional warranty upgrades.

Input Devices: The keyboard feels almost like a PC keyboard

The F12 key can be configured relatively freely
The F12 key can be configured relatively freely

Keyboard

In a workstation, the keyboard is very important, and those who do a lot of typing on a mobile workstation will make a good choice with this model. In our test, the keyboard of the HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 with its number block makes an excellent impression. With its large keystroke, typing feels almost like on a regular PC keyboard, and there is no comparison to the many ultra-slim models in the market. A good typing experience and smooth typing will quickly manifest. The labeling on the keys is easily visible, which is also due to the even background illumination. Except for the space key, which is a little louder, the noise level when typing definitely remains within limits. 

The F12 key, which can be individually configured to start programs and more, is something special. On the other hand, the power button, which is "hidden" above the backspace key, is a bit unusual and takes some getting used to.

Touchpad

The touchpad is placed below the center of the space key, which means that it is shifted toward the left of the center. The width of 12.5 cm (~4.9 in) offers ample space, but the depth of 6 cm (~2.4 in) is significantly more compact, which is due to the keys for the pointer stick above. The touchpad itself offers comfortable sliding characteristics, and the usual multi-touch gestures are supported. Not only can the three keys above and below be felt easily, but they also offer a significant stroke, which ensures a better feedback without creating an acoustic annoyance.

The 4K Display: One of the highlights in the test

Pixel grid
Pixel grid
Only minimal screen bleeding
Only minimal screen bleeding

Our test unit is equipped with a DreamColor display with a 4K resolution (3840 x 2160 pixels). This is one of the best that HP has to offer, but compared to the predecessor, the new generation brings two changes. 

The AdobeRGB color space is not covered completely up to 100% but only to 77.6%, and complete coverage is only achieved for DCI-P3 and sRGB. This is a disadvantage mainly for professional graphics processing. On the other hand, it brings the advantage that the graphics computations under low load are now handled by the iGPU. Before, the dedicated graphics card was always involved, which had a negative effect on the battery life.

At 600 cd/m², the display offers a pleasant brightness and fairly even brightness distribution.

596
cd/m²
621
cd/m²
592
cd/m²
591
cd/m²
573
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
579
cd/m²
565
cd/m²
581
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AUOCD8C
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 621 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 586.1 cd/m² Minimum: 27.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 574 cd/m²
Contrast: 1508:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 0.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
77.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86.87% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.94% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.28% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
AUOCD8C, , 3840x2160, 17.30
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
LG Philips LGD0661, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
17PUW1-B00, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 17.00
Dell Precision 7550
AU Optronics B156ZAN, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
Display
0%
-2%
-2%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
99.28
86.77
-13%
95.55
-4%
96.02
-3%
82.09
-17%
sRGB Coverage
99.94
100
0%
99.79
0%
99.85
0%
99.6
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
86.87
98.84
14%
84.47
-3%
84.46
-3%
96.76
11%
Response Times
28%
5%
25%
12%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
56 ?(26, 30)
44 ?(22, 22)
21%
56 ?(27.6, 28.4)
-0%
41.6 ?(22.8, 18.8)
26%
51.2 ?(24.4, 26.8)
9%
Response Time Black / White *
40 ?(22, 18)
26.4 ?(14, 12.4)
34%
36 ?(20.4, 15.6)
10%
30.8 ?(16.8, 14)
23%
34 ?(20, 14)
15%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-41%
-51%
-8%
-74%
Brightness middle
573
366
-36%
672.8
17%
341
-40%
473.5
-17%
Brightness
586
349
-40%
674
15%
319
-46%
461
-21%
Brightness Distribution
91
88
-3%
89
-2%
80
-12%
90
-1%
Black Level *
0.38
0.38
-0%
0.5
-32%
0.43
-13%
0.55
-45%
Contrast
1508
963
-36%
1346
-11%
793
-47%
861
-43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.9
4.3
-126%
3.48
-83%
1.5
21%
4.8
-153%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.2
7.1
-69%
9.44
-125%
2.8
33%
8.73
-108%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.7
1.1
-57%
3.03
-333%
0.8
-14%
3.08
-340%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.9
5.5
-90%
3.1
-7%
2.1
28%
5.6
-93%
Gamma
2.1 105%
2.47 89%
2.04 108%
2.27 97%
2.34 94%
CCT
6217 105%
6281 103%
6380 102%
6281 103%
7549 86%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
77.6
86
11%
75.2
-3%
75.6
-3%
86.4
11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
100
0%
100
0%
99.8
0%
99.7
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-4% / -24%
-16% / -35%
5% / -3%
-21% / -50%

* ... smaller is better

sRGB
sRGB
AdobeRGB
AdobeRGB
CalMAN - DCI-P3
CalMAN - DCI-P3

The panel offers a balanced image already in the state of delivery, but it can still be further optimized with a calibration. Visually, the display creates an excellent impression, offering vibrant colors and a good contrast of 1508:1.

CalMAN - ColorChecker before calibration
CalMAN - ColorChecker before calibration
CalMAN - Grayscale before calibration
CalMAN - Grayscale before calibration
CalMAN - Saturation before calibration
CalMAN - Saturation before calibration
CalMAN - ColorChecker after calibration
CalMAN - ColorChecker after calibration
CalMAN - Grayscale after calibration
CalMAN - Grayscale after calibration
CalMAN - Saturation after calibration
CalMAN - Saturation after calibration

While with its weight, the mobile HP workstation is not the ideal partner outdoors, the display almost invites you to use the ZBook Fury 17 G7 outdoors. Thanks to the high brightness and matte non-glare screen, you can also work in the sun.

The HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 is easily readable, regardless of your viewing angle
The HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 is easily readable, regardless of your viewing angle
The matte 4K DreamColor display can also be used easily outdoors
The matte 4K DreamColor display can also be used easily outdoors

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21033 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The viewing angle stability of the panel is exemplary, allowing you to read the contents clearly even from steep viewing angles. 

Performance: Sufficient for any task

HP offers its ZBook Fury 17 G7 mobile workstation in various equipment configurations. The 119W5EA model in our test, which costs almost 4800 Euros (~$5749) with an Intel Core i9-10885H and Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, is one of the high-end models of the 17-inch laptop. Above that are only the Xeon W-10855M CPU and the Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, and below that are a whole series of models, starting from the i7-10750H and NVIDIA Quadro T1000 model that costs 2300 Euros (~$2754). 

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z (Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q)
GPU-Z (Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q)
GPU-Z (Intel UHD Graphics)
GPU-Z (Intel UHD Graphics)
HWInfo
HWInfo

Processor

In our version of the mobile workstation, HP trusts the computing performance of the Intel Core i9-10885H. The chip is still based on the known Comet Lake architecture. The regular clock speed is 2.4 GHz and the maximum up to 5.3 GHz or 4.4 GHz with all 8 active cores. With a maximum of 125 watts, HP has configured a generous TDP limit, even if the top value is only reached for a short time due to the high temperature development. The constant value levels out at around 74 watts. In battery operation, the value drops to about 40 watts.

After a slight drop in the beginning, the CPU is able to maintain its performance over time, placing at about the level of the Intel Xeon W-10885M in various benchmarks. Compared to other laptops with the same CPU, the HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 performs just above average in most benchmarks.

085170255340425510595680765850935102011051190127513601445153016151516.821511.771499.761457.141429.341450.911444.721443.051448.231447.491461.351457.511462.581446.241447.391439.781440.821463.431455.661450.381435.61446.181441.911455.231451.011507.731393.151393.491398.851399.481391.061402.081396.941394.61395.2414081387.681394.361405.781394.941385.571399.731392.081396.261394.121398.71389.561387.681395.281402.431628.271577.61590.011578.411581.281591.791586.731570.661573.071573.941576.61583.971566.911579.591571.651569.861580.471583.971566.481561.521562.191558.851580.781566.421578.781562.991569.31571.221563.051567.091571.831578.531560.311567.891580.721577.911581.41566.351571.961570.781573.191567.581577.471570.231552.671554.121559.941562.51572.331566.351047.231058.431070.691080.031081.021079.391084.451088.611083.481086.721078.811083.161076.921076.171084.921086.191065.811083.751081.841085.981078.551074.551078.341082.91082.221080.611075.791079.041078.781078.021081.961078.951083.481080.671082.61082.131079.11088.671075.11074.661077.851082.871088.491082.661081.081071.211075.851077.731079.911081.141279.551206.711207.261199.941192.071196.571203.881198.791206.711199.331192.641195.991191.541183.821199.91194.321193.531181.651197.11179.451192.641187.651193.181189.871194.891652.141604.621609.011603.531609.791589.641613.681604.361602.441604.171604.171577.911607.21602.891607.071608.171608.31605.911602.051607.461605.911604.31605.851607.141612.321610.371608.431605.651607.071608.041604.361609.591608.881611.541608.361607.591606.551597.381602.821605.591603.851608.691598.151599.11604.561612.191601.921609.461609.851607.01Tooltip
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H: Ø1456 (1429.34-1516.82)
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE Intel Core i9-9880H: Ø1400 (1385.57-1507.73)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 Intel Xeon W-10885M: Ø1573 (1552.67-1628.27)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 Intel Xeon W-10885M: Ø1079 (1047.23-1088.67)
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T Intel Xeon E-2276M: Ø1198 (1179.45-1279.55)
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M: Ø1606 (1577.91-1652.14)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Workstation
  (440 - 622, n=35, last 2 years)
521 Points ∼100% +7%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
502 Points ∼96% +3%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
499 Points ∼96% +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
489 Points ∼94%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
488 Points ∼94% 0%
Average Intel Core i9-10885H
  (460 - 513, n=3)
487 Points ∼93% 0%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Intel Xeon E-2276M
484 Points ∼93% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
471 Points ∼90% -4%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
3930 Points ∼100% +8%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
3835 Points ∼98% +5%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
2727 Points ∼69% -25%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
3639 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i9-10885H
  (2798 - 3762, n=3)
3400 Points ∼87% -7%
Average of class Workstation
  (1602 - 5180, n=35, last 2 years)
3241 Points ∼82% -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
3235 Points ∼82% -11%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Intel Xeon E-2276M
2865 Points ∼73% -21%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
211 Points ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
209 Points ∼99% -1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
211 Points ∼100%
Average of class Workstation
  (180 - 244, n=37, last 2 years)
210 Points ∼100% 0%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
208 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-10885H
  (197 - 212, n=3)
207 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Intel Xeon E-2276M
201 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
192 Points ∼91% -9%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1652 (1577.91min - 1652.14max) Points ∼100% +9%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1628 (1552.67min - 1628.27max) Points ∼99% +7%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1089 (1047.23min - 1088.67max) Points ∼66% -28%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
1517 (1429.34min - 1516.82max) Points ∼92%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
1508 (1385.57min - 1507.73max) Points ∼91% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-10885H
  (1264 - 1726, n=3)
1502 Points ∼91% -1%
Average of class Workstation
  (675 - 2192, n=38, last 2 years)
1389 Points ∼84% -8%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Intel Xeon E-2276M
1280 (1179.45min - 1279.55max) Points ∼77% -16%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
412 Seconds * ∼100% -36%
Average of class Workstation
  (250 - 703, n=33, last 2 years)
401 Seconds * ∼97% -33%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Intel Xeon E-2276M
384 Seconds * ∼93% -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
326 Seconds * ∼79% -8%
Average Intel Core i9-10885H
  (283 - 348, n=3)
311 Seconds * ∼75% -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
302 Seconds * ∼73%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
281 Seconds * ∼68% +7%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
5703 MIPS ∼100% +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
5589 MIPS ∼98%
Average Intel Core i9-10885H
  (5397 - 5668, n=3)
5551 MIPS ∼97% -1%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
5495 MIPS ∼96% -2%
Average of class Workstation
  (4417 - 5773, n=35, last 2 years)
5296 MIPS ∼93% -5%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Intel Xeon E-2276M
5214 MIPS ∼91% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
5068 MIPS ∼89% -9%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
48044 MIPS ∼100% +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
42138 MIPS ∼88% +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
41823 MIPS ∼87%
Average Intel Core i9-10885H
  (36740 - 42993, n=3)
40519 MIPS ∼84% -3%
Average of class Workstation
  (19147 - 53426, n=35, last 2 years)
37339 MIPS ∼78% -11%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
36204 MIPS ∼75% -13%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Intel Xeon E-2276M
33994 MIPS ∼71% -19%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Workstation
  (1124 - 1702, n=32, last 2 years)
1388 Points ∼100% +5%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1340 Points ∼97% +2%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1331 Points ∼96% +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
1317 Points ∼95%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Intel Xeon E-2276M
1303 Points ∼94% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-10885H
  (1216 - 1376, n=3)
1303 Points ∼94% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
1237 Points ∼89% -6%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
8378 Points ∼100% +28%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
7353 Points ∼88% +13%
Average Intel Core i9-10885H
  (6529 - 7693, n=3)
7045 Points ∼84% +8%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
6948 Points ∼83% +6%
Average of class Workstation
  (3852 - 10081, n=32, last 2 years)
6757 Points ∼81% +3%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Intel Xeon E-2276M
6595 Points ∼79% +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
6529 Points ∼78%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
13.1 fps ∼100% +16%
Average Intel Core i9-10885H
  (10.6 - 12.5, n=3)
11.5 fps ∼88% +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
11.3 fps ∼86%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
11.1 fps ∼85% -2%
Average of class Workstation
  (5.24 - 15.8, n=34, last 2 years)
10.5 fps ∼80% -7%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Intel Xeon E-2276M
9.68 fps ∼74% -14%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
8.89 fps ∼68% -21%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
58.1 s * ∼100% -6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
54.8 s * ∼94%
Average Intel Core i9-10885H
  (45.9 - 59.6, n=3)
53.4 s * ∼92% +3%
Average of class Workstation
  (23 - 106, n=35, last 2 years)
52.5 s * ∼90% +4%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Intel Xeon E-2276M
51.9 s * ∼89% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
49.8 s * ∼86% +9%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
46.5 s * ∼80% +15%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
0.621 sec * ∼100% -9%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.541 - 0.695, n=34, last 2 years)
0.588 sec * ∼95% -3%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Intel Xeon E-2276M
0.587 sec * ∼95% -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
0.571 sec * ∼92%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M
0.57 sec * ∼92% -0%
Average Intel Core i9-10885H
  (0.564 - 0.572, n=3)
0.569 sec * ∼92% -0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
0.551 sec * ∼89% +4%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1517 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
191 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
211 Points
Help

System Performance

In the benchmarks on the system performance, our test unit measures well, keeping up with the competitors that are in part equipped with more powerful hardware. The differences between the comparison models can only be seen at the limits at most. The power is easily sufficient for all the usual demands on a mobile workstation. Everyday operation is smooth and without any conspicuous behavior. 

PCMark 10
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6491 Points ∼100% +21%
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
5904 Points ∼91% +10%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5733 Points ∼88% +7%
Average of class Workstation
  (4096 - 7156, n=34, last 2 years)
5647 Points ∼87% +5%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5363 Points ∼83%
Average Intel Core i9-10885H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
5363 Points ∼83% 0%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), E-2276M, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5239 Points ∼81% -2%
Essentials
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), E-2276M, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
10095 Points ∼100% +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10093 Points ∼100% +25%
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
9811 Points ∼97% +22%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9530 Points ∼94% +18%
Average of class Workstation
  (8059 - 10894, n=34, last 2 years)
9527 Points ∼94% +18%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8059 Points ∼80%
Average Intel Core i9-10885H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
8059 Points ∼80% 0%
Productivity
Average of class Workstation
  (6426 - 9604, n=34, last 2 years)
8094 Points ∼100% +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8071 Points ∼100% +14%
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
7735 Points ∼96% +9%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), E-2276M, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
7700 Points ∼95% +8%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7384 Points ∼91% +4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
7110 Points ∼88%
Average Intel Core i9-10885H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
7110 Points ∼88% 0%
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9113 Points ∼100% +23%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
7427 Points ∼81%
Average Intel Core i9-10885H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
7427 Points ∼81% 0%
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
7360 Points ∼81% -1%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7269 Points ∼80% -2%
Average of class Workstation
  (3221 - 10441, n=34, last 2 years)
6546 Points ∼72% -12%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), E-2276M, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5021 Points ∼55% -32%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), E-2276M, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
4256 Points ∼100% +13%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4175 Points ∼98% +11%
Average of class Workstation
  (3311 - 4487, n=16, last 2 years)
3895 Points ∼92% +4%
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
3781 Points ∼89% +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
3750 Points ∼88%
Average Intel Core i9-10885H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
3750 Points ∼88% 0%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), E-2276M, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5370 Points ∼100% +22%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5099 Points ∼95% +16%
Average of class Workstation
  (4298 - 5629, n=16, last 2 years)
4881 Points ∼91% +11%
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
4726 Points ∼88% +7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
4397 Points ∼82%
Average Intel Core i9-10885H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
4397 Points ∼82% 0%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3750 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7727 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4397 points
PCMark 10 Score
5363 points
Help

DPC Latencies

In the test, the device showed relatively high latencies that did not improve even in several repetitions.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
10043.1 μs * ∼100% -95%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5161 μs * ∼51%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3260.4 μs * ∼32% +37%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), E-2276M, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
927 μs * ∼9% +82%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
765.1 μs * ∼8% +85%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Solution

The built in 1-TB storage solution (about 890 GB available in the state of delivery) delivers a good performance in most of the tests that is in parts significantly above the average of other workstations, depending on the benchmark.

HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
Dell Precision 7550
SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
Average WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-3%
3%
12%
-8%
2%
Write 4K
116.3
150.11
29%
114.1
-2%
228.9
97%
121
4%
140 ?(89.9 - 186, n=19)
20%
Read 4K
44.68
48.48
9%
57.18
28%
74.06
66%
42.16
-6%
44.5 ?(31 - 50.7, n=19)
0%
Write Seq
2357
1414.01
-40%
2580
9%
1510
-36%
2150
-9%
2337 ?(1790 - 2983, n=18)
-1%
Read Seq
2159
1261.71
-42%
2527
17%
2340
8%
1755
-19%
2114 ?(1615 - 2531, n=18)
-2%
Write 4K Q32T1
542.7
430.71
-21%
480.2
-12%
447.1
-18%
395.3
-27%
435 ?(318 - 570, n=19)
-20%
Read 4K Q32T1
390.1
538.56
38%
387.6
-1%
551.6
41%
381.8
-2%
459 ?(296 - 579, n=19)
18%
Write Seq Q32T1
2938
2982.5
2%
2996
2%
1198
-59%
2730
-7%
3047 ?(2602 - 3102, n=19)
4%
Read Seq Q32T1
3399
3548.6
4%
2853
-16%
3204
-6%
3468
2%
3307 ?(2871 - 3433, n=19)
-3%
AS SSD
67%
-9%
-1%
27%
42%
Seq Read
2423.45
2627
8%
2127.46
-12%
2558.17
6%
2027.61
-16%
2612 ?(1886 - 2986, n=19)
8%
Seq Write
1203.39
2375
97%
1295.71
8%
1035.46
-14%
1192.77
-1%
1936 ?(928 - 2657, n=19)
61%
4K Read
42.24
53.54
27%
54.84
30%
69.57
65%
42.31
0%
42.8 ?(29.8 - 49.3, n=19)
1%
4K Write
115.54
139.44
21%
110.83
-4%
201.46
74%
105.49
-9%
128 ?(52 - 221, n=19)
11%
4K-64 Read
1630.35
1778.78
9%
1419.72
-13%
926.63
-43%
1128.12
-31%
1358 ?(789 - 1734, n=19)
-17%
4K-64 Write
1978.9
1954.94
-1%
2012.49
2%
898.3
-55%
1537.04
-22%
1908 ?(846 - 2797, n=19)
-4%
Access Time Read *
0.057
0.055
4%
0.046
19%
0.038
33%
0.069
-21%
0.0685 ?(0.041 - 0.157, n=19)
-20%
Access Time Write *
0.033
0.027
18%
0.099
-200%
0.019
42%
0.106
-221%
0.0614 ?(0.017 - 0.36, n=19)
-86%
Score Read
1915
2095
9%
1687
-12%
1252
-35%
1373
-28%
1662 ?(1107 - 2070, n=19)
-13%
Score Write
2215
2332
5%
2253
2%
1203
-46%
1762
-20%
2230 ?(1188 - 3011, n=19)
1%
Score Total
5047
5489
9%
4770
-5%
3040
-40%
3801
-25%
4710 ?(3274 - 5673, n=19)
-7%
Copy ISO MB/s
2386.66
2932.4
23%
2779.26
16%
1768.18
-26%
2105 ?(1007 - 2903, n=15)
-12%
Copy Program MB/s
106.44
595.36
459%
123.31
16%
627.09
489%
563 ?(43.1 - 1072, n=15)
429%
Copy Game MB/s
356.54
1264.45
255%
440.8
24%
1476.6
314%
1188 ?(357 - 1627, n=15)
233%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
32% / 42%
-3% / -5%
6% / 4%
10% / 15%
22% / 27%

* ... smaller is better

WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3399 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2938 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 390.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 542.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2159 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2357 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 44.68 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 116.3 MB/s

Constant Performance Reads: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0Tooltip

Graphics Card

In our test configuration, HP uses the Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q graphics card, which is the Max-Q version of the Quadro RTX 4000 that is trimmed for efficiency. It is based on the same chip as the GeForce RTX 2080 (TU104), but equipped with less shaders. It runs at a 780 Watt basic clock speed and up to 1560 MHz boost.

As expected, the device remains behind the comparison models with the even higher-rated NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q in the test, but it still convinces with a lot of power and an evaluation that is significantly above the workstation average. In less demanding tasks, the dedicated GPU is not used, and the Intel UHD graphics takes over to the delight of the battery. In battery operation, the device achieves values that are about 50% lower in 3DMark 11, so the full performance is only available in mains operation.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Xeon E-2276M
29260 Points ∼100% +24%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Xeon E-2276M (Battery mode)
18233 Points ∼62% -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H
27002 Points ∼92% +14%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
26369 Points ∼90% +11%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
26242 Points ∼90% +11%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
23684 Points ∼81%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
  (23464 - 23684, n=2)
23574 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (4110 - 41904, n=35, last 2 years)
18096 Points ∼62% -24%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Xeon E-2276M
100792 Points ∼100% +187%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
63606 Points ∼63% +81%
Average of class Workstation
  (18564 - 133756, n=23, last 2 years)
53492 Points ∼53% +52%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
50993 Points ∼51% +45%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
35167 Points ∼35%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
35167 Points ∼35% 0%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Xeon E-2276M
21715 Points ∼100% +27%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H
20079 Points ∼92% +18%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
19759 Points ∼91% +16%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
19342 Points ∼89% +13%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
17049 Points ∼79%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
17049 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (3169 - 29610, n=36, last 2 years)
13624 Points ∼63% -20%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Xeon E-2276M
8708 Points ∼100% +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H
7717 Points ∼89% +14%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
7443 Points ∼85% +10%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
7349 Points ∼84% +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
6764 Points ∼78%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
6764 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (988 - 11580, n=36, last 2 years)
5118 Points ∼59% -24%
SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
114.41 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
114 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (23.2 - 199, n=20, last 2 years)
94.5 fps ∼83% -17%
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
181 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
180.96 fps ∼100%
Average of class Workstation
  (17 - 309, n=20, last 2 years)
134 fps ∼74% -26%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
38.33 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
38.3 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (7.5 - 58.7, n=20, last 2 years)
26.4 fps ∼69% -31%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
160 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
159.89 fps ∼100%
Average of class Workstation
  (46.8 - 290, n=20, last 2 years)
150 fps ∼94% -6%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
35.71 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
35.7 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.77 - 71.6, n=20, last 2 years)
24.4 fps ∼68% -32%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
88.3 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
88.29 fps ∼100%
Average of class Workstation
  (23 - 140, n=20, last 2 years)
71.7 fps ∼81% -19%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
60.5 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
60.47 fps ∼100%
Average of class Workstation
  (10.6 - 106, n=20, last 2 years)
45.4 fps ∼75% -25%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
64.1 fps ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
64.09 fps ∼100%
Average of class Workstation
  (11.6 - 130, n=20, last 2 years)
56 fps ∼87% -13%
3840x2160 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average of class Workstation
  (31.2 - 92.5, n=6, last 2 years)
70.8 fps ∼100% +12%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
63.11 fps ∼89%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
63.1 fps ∼89% 0%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Workstation
  (14.4 - 172, n=6, last 2 years)
114 fps ∼100% +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
111.43 fps ∼98%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
111 fps ∼97% 0%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Workstation
  (9.93 - 23.6, n=6, last 2 years)
17.3 fps ∼100% +19%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
14.6 fps ∼84% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
14.57 fps ∼84%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Workstation
  (75.8 - 139, n=6, last 2 years)
113 fps ∼100% +49%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
75.8 fps ∼67% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
75.77 fps ∼67%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)
Average of class Workstation
  (9.4 - 139, n=6, last 2 years)
57.9 fps ∼100% +40%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
41.4 fps ∼72% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
41.38 fps ∼71%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)
Average of class Workstation
  (49.8 - 102, n=6, last 2 years)
74.1 fps ∼100% +26%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
58.7 fps ∼79% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
58.68 fps ∼79%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Workstation
  (22.3 - 64.2, n=6, last 2 years)
44.3 fps ∼100% +23%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
36 fps ∼81% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
35.99 fps ∼81%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Workstation
  (30.5 - 87.8, n=6, last 2 years)
65.2 fps ∼100% +44%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
45.3 fps ∼69% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
45.25 fps ∼69%
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H
178.89 fps ∼100% +60%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
150.44 fps ∼84% +34%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
142.63 fps ∼80% +27%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
  (112 - 130, n=2)
121 fps ∼68% +8%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Xeon E-2276M
118.64 fps ∼66% +6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
112.06 fps ∼63%
Average of class Workstation
  (57.3 - 204, n=33, last 2 years)
109 fps ∼61% -3%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H
357.07 fps ∼100% +58%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
295.24 fps ∼83% +31%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
285.08 fps ∼80% +26%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
  (225 - 265, n=2)
245 fps ∼69% +9%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Xeon E-2276M
226.4 fps ∼63% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
225.45 fps ∼63%
Average of class Workstation
  (17.4 - 465, n=33, last 2 years)
160 fps ∼45% -29%
Showcase (showcase-02)
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Xeon E-2276M
105.27 fps ∼100% +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H
100.28 fps ∼95% +12%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
95.67 fps ∼91% +7%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
95.24 fps ∼90% +7%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
  (89.3 - 96.6, n=2)
92.9 fps ∼88% +4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
89.26 fps ∼85%
Average of class Workstation
  (13.7 - 132, n=32, last 2 years)
63.3 fps ∼60% -29%
Medical (medical-02)
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H
102.54 fps ∼100% +25%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Xeon E-2276M
98.82 fps ∼96% +21%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
97.67 fps ∼95% +19%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
90.77 fps ∼89% +11%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
81.9 fps ∼80% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
81.87 fps ∼80%
Average of class Workstation
  (15.8 - 133, n=33, last 2 years)
59.9 fps ∼58% -27%
Maya (maya-05)
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H
286.1 fps ∼100% +77%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
210.39 fps ∼74% +30%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
200.49 fps ∼70% +24%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
  (162 - 208, n=2)
185 fps ∼65% +14%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Xeon E-2276M
182.81 fps ∼64% +13%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
162 fps ∼57%
Average of class Workstation
  (40.3 - 341, n=33, last 2 years)
142 fps ∼50% -12%
Energy (energy-02)
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Xeon E-2276M
46.13 fps ∼100% +31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H
45.02 fps ∼98% +27%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
39.92 fps ∼87% +13%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
36.8 fps ∼80% +4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
35.33 fps ∼77%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
 
35.3 fps ∼77% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.77 - 74.3, n=33, last 2 years)
24.1 fps ∼52% -32%
Creo (creo-02)
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H
269.9 fps ∼100% +66%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
224.9 fps ∼83% +39%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
223.14 fps ∼83% +38%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
  (162 - 210, n=2)
186 fps ∼69% +15%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Xeon E-2276M
185.36 fps ∼69% +14%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
162.13 fps ∼60%
Average of class Workstation
  (35.3 - 320, n=33, last 2 years)
140 fps ∼52% -14%
Catia (catia-05)
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H
277.28 fps ∼100% +53%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
242.87 fps ∼88% +34%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
225.34 fps ∼81% +24%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
  (182 - 228, n=2)
205 fps ∼74% +13%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Xeon E-2276M
183.79 fps ∼66% +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
181.55 fps ∼65%
Average of class Workstation
  (47.5 - 339, n=33, last 2 years)
154 fps ∼56% -15%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H
184.29 fps ∼100% +42%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
176.8 fps ∼96% +37%
Dell Precision 7550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
176.18 fps ∼96% +36%
Asus StudioBook Pro X W730G5T-H8050T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Xeon E-2276M
168.67 fps ∼92% +30%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
  (129 - 172, n=2)
151 fps ∼82% +17%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
129.46 fps ∼70%
Average of class Workstation
  (25.3 - 232, n=33, last 2 years)
117 fps ∼63% -10%
3DMark 11 Performance
19079 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
34399 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
23809 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15010 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
6724 points
Help

Gaming Performance

This power house has no trouble with a game such as "The Witcher 3," even at the highest graphics level. In the other games, the frame rates also remain within very playable ranges even in 4K resolution. Over time, the frame rate drops slightly, as a 3DMark stress test with 91% frame rate stability shows. So the workstation is also suitable as a gaming laptop, even if most buyers will probably appreciate its work performance more than the gaming performance.

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
345 fps ∼100% +56%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q