Acer Aspire 5 A517 laptop review: Attractive 17.3-incher with Tiger Lake CPU and MX350 GPU
After we recently reviewed the 15.6-inch Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A, we now have the 17.3-inch Acer Aspire 5 A517. With its Intel Core i7-1165G7 and GeForce MX350 paired with 16 GB of RAM, it's much more powerful on paper. So, is it also superior in terms of performance and not only in terms of display size? This is one of the central questions that we will address in our review.
Possible contenders in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.7 % | 03/2021 | Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350 | 2.2 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
78.6 % | 11/2020 | HP 17-ca1149ng R5 3500U, Vega 8 | 2.5 kg | 24.5 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
85.8 % | 11/2020 | Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H i5-10300H, UHD Graphics 630 | 2.3 kg | 19.5 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1200 | |
76.4 % | 09/2020 | Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD i7-10510U, GeForce MX250 | 2.8 kg | 24.65 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
81.4 % | 02/2021 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.4 % | 12/2020 | Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350 | 1.8 kg | 16.1 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Case
As is familiar from the Aspire series, this model is also wrapped in a classy and sober case. It's made of sand-blasted aluminum, which not only feels good and looks high-quality, but it also effectively protects the case from fingerprints. The entire device itself is relatively resistant to torsion. It can even be carried around holding it by a corner in an opened state without it creaking. There's nothing to criticize in terms of our test device's workmanship. It's what you would expect from a brand like Acer.
The hinges are pleasantly tight, providing a high-quality impression and supporting the screen reliably in every position. As a result, however, the device is quite difficult to open, so that two hands are required. When attempting to open the lid with just one hand, the device is lifted completely off the table. The maximum aperture angle is about 140 degrees, and the base unit becomes slightly raised due to the overlapping lid.
Compared to the 15.6-inch Aspire, the 1.7-inch difference compared with the A517's display diagonal size translates into 3 additional centimeters in width and around 4 centimeters in depth. With just under 20 mm compared to 18 mm, it can't quite keep up in terms of thickness, either.
However, if we compare the Aspire 5 A517 with other 17-inch laptops, the device cuts quite a fine figure. Compared to the Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD, it's about 2 cm more compact on both sides and also 5 mm thinner. The device doesn't have to shy away from competing with the HP 17-ca1149ng, either.
Among the 17.3-inch comparison devices, only the Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H is clearly more compact, but it also costs considerably over 500 Euros (~$599) more. However, even this device is a bit heavier than the pleasantly light Aspire 5 A517 with its 2.2 kg.
Connectivity
As usual, the ports of the Acer Aspire 5 A517 are distributed on the left and right sides of the device, with the left side having more ports. Besides the connection for the included power adapter, there's a LAN port with Gigabit speeds as an alternative to the built-in WLAN module. An external monitor can be connected via HDMI as can two USB-A devices and one USB-C device. On the opposite side, another USB-A port is available as well as a combined 3.5 mm audio jack for headsets and the like. The device can be secured via the Kensington slot, which is also located on the right side.
All ports can be used without issues. There are no restrictions as long as you don't use oversized connectors. All in all, the A517 offers quite a generous connectivity, which is certainly also due to the space available in the 17.3-inch case. Having a LAN port in particular isn't a given for today's laptops.
Communication
Acer uses the Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 for wireless network connections. In our test setup, it lags behind the identically equipped competition when receiving data; consequently, it falls short of its capabilities. On the other hand, the speeds for sending data were on par with or even higher than those of the identically equipped rivals; they were even significantly above average.
Webcam
Acer integrates a simple 720p webcam into the Aspire 5 A517. It's located in the usual position in the center of the upper display edge and is qualitatively sufficient for the usual purposes such as video calls. A superior picture quality shouldn't be expected, though. A certain amount of image noise and blurriness is noticeable in indoor images in the absence of daylight.
Security
In terms of security features, the test device has a fingerprint scanner for unlocking as well as a slot for a Kensington lock to secure the device to a table or similar.
Accessories
Acer only includes the mandatory power adapter with the Aspire 5 A517. Other accessories like a protective case or a docking station can optionally be purchased directly from the manufacturer.
Maintenance
There are 14 Phillips screws on the bottom that block the way to the device's interior. In addition, the battery is not removable.
Warranty
Acer grants buyers the usual 24-month warranty out of the factory. Warranty extensions can be optionally purchased.
Input devices
Keyboard
Thanks to the display diagonal and the resulting large case, there is enough room for a keyboard including the adjacent number pad. The device's size also benefits the key size. The backlit keys are easy to read and pleasantly large, which makes for a comfortable typing feel and speed. The key travel, which is quite pronounced for a laptop, and a clearly perceptible pressure point also contribute to this. However, we would have liked the keyboard to be a bit quieter. The space bar in particular makes a rather cheap-sounding and loud rattling noise when pressed.
Touchpad
The touchpad is offset to the left under the space bar due to the number keys and, thus, not even close to the center of the case. If you use the pad with your right hand, this might be a bit annoying when browsing the web, for example. Furthermore, the hands are also offset to the left when typing, so the distance to the touchpad is short here at least. The size of around 10.5 x 8 cm is absolutely sufficient.
The mouse jumps from one side of the display to the other if you glide your finger quickly over the smooth and haptically pleasant surface. Two fingers can be used to scroll vertically. The click mechanism of the two buttons is pleasantly quiet and sounds high-quality. However, there is no clearly perceptible border between the left and right buttons, so that the wrong "mouse button" can easily be activated with a relatively centered click. The fingerprint scanner for unlocking is not hidden in the keyboard, but it's a small black field in the upper left corner of the touchpad. It does its job satisfactorily.
Display
Acer accommodates 1920x1080 pixels in a 17.3-inch display. This provides a pixel density of 130 ppi, which is sufficient to only be able to identify individual pixels when looking very closely. The IPS panel is matte, which makes the problem with reflections obsolete. Consequently, there are no unwanted reflections from lamps or windows. This also benefits outdoor work, even though the device clearly isn't the best choice in terms of mobility due to its dimensions. The 14-inch or 15.6-inch models are more advisable here.
The device reaches a peak brightness of 321 cd/m² in the center. The surrounding areas show slightly lower values of around 280 cd/m². Overall, these aren't particularly good brightness rates but moderate instead. The brightness distribution of 81% is solid and also average. However, compared to the considerably more expensive Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H, this test candidate clearly lags behind. There's noticeable screen bleeding at the upper display edge as well as at the two upper corners.
|
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 320 cd/m²
Contrast: 892:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.26 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.98% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 BOE084E, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | HP 17-ca1149ng Chi Mei CMN175E, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H SHP14D7, IPS, 1920x1200, 17.30 | Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD BOE CQ NV173FHM-N41, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A LG Philips LGD065A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T Panda LM156LF-5L04, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 50% | 83% | 53% | -4% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.98 | 61.4 54% | 77.4 94% | 63.4 59% | 38.32 -4% | 39.01 -2% |
sRGB Coverage | 59.3 | 86.6 46% | 100 69% | 86.9 47% | 57.5 -3% | 58.5 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.3 | 62 50% | 76.6 85% | 63.2 53% | 39.6 -4% | 40.33 -2% |
Response Times | -206% | -351% | -104% | -207% | -205% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 14 ? | 40 ? -186% | 60.4 ? -331% | 29 ? -107% | 37 ? -164% | 38 ? -171% |
Response Time Black / White * | 8 ? | 26 ? -225% | 37.6 ? -370% | 16 ? -100% | 28 ? -250% | 27 ? -238% |
PWM Frequency | 250 ? | 2500 ? | 2500 ? | |||
Screen | 6% | 58% | 9% | -4% | -26% | |
Brightness middle | 321 | 327 2% | 636 98% | 261 -19% | 285 -11% | 287 -11% |
Brightness | 282 | 287 2% | 580 106% | 258 -9% | 255 -10% | 261 -7% |
Brightness Distribution | 81 | 80 -1% | 86 6% | 81 0% | 84 4% | 84 4% |
Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.25 31% | 0.34 6% | 0.17 53% | 0.325 10% | 0.51 -42% |
Contrast | 892 | 1308 47% | 1871 110% | 1535 72% | 877 -2% | 563 -37% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 4.03 6% | 2.4 44% | 4.25 1% | 4.23 2% | 4.72 -10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.1 | 7.35 -4% | 3.5 51% | 7.39 -4% | 7.94 -12% | 17.94 -153% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.26 | 4.84 -114% | 2 12% | 4.48 -98% | 2.51 -11% | 2.2 3% |
Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.39 92% | 2.08 106% | 2.5 88% | 2.57 86% | 2.51 88% |
CCT | 6650 98% | 6850 95% | 6704 97% | 7264 89% | 6626 98% | 6758 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 56 47% | 67.5 78% | 56.8 49% | 36 -5% | 37 -3% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 87 47% | 100 69% | 86.7 47% | 57 -3% | 58 -2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.5 | 2.1 | 3.75 | 3.74 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -50% /
-13% | -70% /
8% | -14% /
3% | -72% /
-31% | -78% /
-45% |
* ... smaller is better
In terms of contrast, the panel of the Acer Aspire 5 A517 scores below average when pitted against the comparison models. The same applies to the black levels, since they aren't very deep. Furthermore, the device won't win any trophies with its sRGB color-space coverage of only 59%. However, this is sufficient for normal users without professional demands, especially since color reproduction looks pleasing and quite balanced. However, the matte IPS panel can't keep up with the brilliance of glossy displays.
As already mentioned, the display doesn't offer very good brightness values. However, this is still sufficient for normal use, especially in combination with the matte display. The rates should also be sufficient for outdoor use.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 12 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ≤ 8 % brightness setting | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
The screen of the Acer Aspire A5 A517 is always easy to view and read even from very sharp angles. However, this is not surprising since viewing-angle stability is one of the strengths of IPS panels like this one.
Performance
With its equipment consisting of an Intel Core i7-1165G7 with 4x 2.8 GHz, the Nvidia GeForce MX350 graphics card, and 16 GB of DDR4 SDRAM, the Acer Aspire 5 A517 is a good all-rounder. It offers enough computing power for all office and Internet applications, and it can also be used for the occasional game.
Processor
The built-in Intel Core i7-1165G7 processor belongs to the latest generation, i.e. the 11th one, which goes by the name of Tiger Lake. The base clock speed of the four processor cores is 2.8 GHz. They can be boosted up to 4.7 GHz if required. Hyper-Threading with two threads per core is also supported.
The clock rate hardly drops during the stress test, and it remains quite constant at a level that is slightly above the Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T that is equipped with the same CPU. Both devices engage in a close duel across all CPU benchmarks, where sometimes one and sometimes the other is ahead by a few points. Overall, the processors are tuned very similarly, and they show their higher potential compared to, for example, the Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A with the slightly less powerful Intel Core i5-1135G7.
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average of class Office (181.3 - 764, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (442 - 589, n=81) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD | |
HP 17-ca1149ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Office (356 - 5904, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1060 - 2657, n=81) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
HP 17-ca1149ng | |
Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T | |
Average of class Office (82.6 - 284, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (115 - 230, n=78) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD | |
HP 17-ca1149ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (160.8 - 2642, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (553 - 1027, n=86) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
HP 17-ca1149ng | |
Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
HP 17-ca1149ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (468 - 1138, n=80) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Average of class Office (214 - 2844, n=121, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (4478 - 5507, n=80) | |
Average of class Office (2233 - 6687, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD | |
HP 17-ca1149ng |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Office (4226 - 62349, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (15347 - 27405, n=80) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
HP 17-ca1149ng | |
Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1302 - 1595, n=77) | |
Average of class Office (510 - 1974, n=122, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD | |
HP 17-ca1149ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=122, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3078 - 5926, n=77) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD | |
HP 17-ca1149ng |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Office (1.55 - 17.4, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1.39 - 8.47, n=80) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD | |
HP 17-ca1149ng |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP 17-ca1149ng | |
Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 117.5, n=120, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21.5 - 88.1, n=78) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP 17-ca1149ng | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (0.552 - 1.002, n=80) | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.397, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 |
* ... smaller is better
System performance
The Acer Aspire 5 A715 keeps up with its peers when it comes to the overall system performance measured with PCMark. Compared with the quite similarly equipped Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T, one test candidate has the edge at times, while the other scores better in other cases.
The device shows a clear difference and achieves a significantly higher score compared to the cheaper and inferiorly equipped Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD 17.3-incher; the same is true in comparison with the Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A 15.6-incher, which is also equipped with less powerful hardware. The more powerful CPU and graphics card configurations are noticeable here. This is also evident in everyday use, where the device is equipped for all common applications.
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4878 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5695 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5278 points | |
Help |
DPC latencies
The Aspire 5 A517 shows average latencies in the test. The solid rating suggests that the device is also suitable for more demanding tasks like video editing or real-time audio. Nevertheless, this is still only a momentary snapshot.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H | |
HP 17-ca1149ng | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T |
* ... smaller is better
Storage
The 1 TB SSD (WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00) installed in the 17.3-inch Acer Aspire 5 delivers good performance in the test. It achieves the best rates in most of the CrystalDiskMark and ASSSD tests in comparison with its contenders, and it often even leaves the more expensive Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H behind.
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00 | HP 17-ca1149ng Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD | Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Average WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -37% | -28% | -16% | -10% | -8% | -9% | |
Write 4K | 242.2 | 133.5 -45% | 106.9 -56% | 185.3 -23% | 86.8 -64% | 214.4 -11% | 182.7 ? -25% |
Read 4K | 51.6 | 53 3% | 41.49 -20% | 62.7 22% | 66.4 29% | 58.5 13% | 48.6 ? -6% |
Write Seq | 1970 | 967 -51% | 1025 -48% | 1681 -15% | 1851 -6% | 1678 -15% | 1979 ? 0% |
Read Seq | 2010 | 1602 -20% | 1429 -29% | 1570 -22% | 1707 -15% | 1648 -18% | 1828 ? -9% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 579 | 230.4 -60% | 342.8 -41% | 426.9 -26% | 542 -6% | 644 11% | 498 ? -14% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 673 | 337.9 -50% | 364.2 -46% | 514 -24% | 589 -12% | 600 -11% | 573 ? -15% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1976 | 976 -51% | 1714 -13% | 1738 -12% | 1960 -1% | 1760 -11% | 1980 ? 0% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2420 | 1817 -25% | 3205 32% | 1780 -26% | 2227 -8% | 1853 -23% | 2336 ? -3% |
AS SSD | -39% | 2% | -4% | 32% | -8% | 10% | |
Seq Read | 2217 | 1583 -29% | 2424 9% | 1753 -21% | 2023 -9% | 1754 -21% | 2059 ? -7% |
Seq Write | 1920 | 839 -56% | 1159 -40% | 1584 -17% | 1781 -7% | 1567 -18% | 1812 ? -6% |
4K Read | 31.52 | 45.09 43% | 34.68 10% | 52.3 66% | 61.9 96% | 53 68% | 37.4 ? 19% |
4K Write | 215.3 | 87 -60% | 101.7 -53% | 124.3 -42% | 128.7 -40% | 167.9 -22% | 164.6 ? -24% |
4K-64 Read | 301.4 | 325.9 8% | 985 227% | 592 96% | 904 200% | 586 94% | 765 ? 154% |
4K-64 Write | 1395 | 590 -58% | 956 -31% | 828 -41% | 976 -30% | 858 -38% | 1431 ? 3% |
Access Time Read * | 0.052 | 0.099 -90% | 0.116 -123% | 0.097 -87% | 0.0364 ? 30% | ||
Access Time Write * | 0.035 | 0.052 -49% | 0.036 -3% | 0.04 -14% | 0.031 11% | 0.038 -9% | 0.07029 ? -101% |
Score Read | 555 | 529 -5% | 1262 127% | 819 48% | 1168 110% | 815 47% | 1008 ? 82% |
Score Write | 1802 | 761 -58% | 1173 -35% | 1110 -38% | 1283 -29% | 1182 -34% | 1677 ? -7% |
Score Total | 2635 | 1540 -42% | 3020 15% | 2357 -11% | 3053 16% | 2421 -8% | 3337 ? 27% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1662 | 1173 -29% | 1128 -32% | 1480 -11% | 1477 -11% | 1653 ? -1% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 641 | 239.3 -63% | 585 -9% | 432.4 -33% | 495.3 -23% | 528 ? -18% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1266 | 589 -53% | 902 -29% | 761 -40% | 719 -43% | 1173 ? -7% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -38% /
-38% | -13% /
-9% | -10% /
-9% | 11% /
13% | -8% /
-8% | 1% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics card
Instead of only relying on on-board graphics, Acer has equipped the Acer Aspire 5 A517 with the mid-range GeForce MX350 graphics card, which is equipped with 2 GB of DDR5 graphics memory with a 64-bit connection. For less demanding tasks, the device alternatively uses the CPU's Intel Iris Xe integrated graphics.
The device delivers solid graphics performance in the test, which is above the MX350 average. The Aspire 5 is on par with the Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T that is identically equipped in many aspects and also features the same graphics solution. As expected, it leaves the less powerful competition, such as the smaller Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A with the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7, a good deal behind.
3DMark 11 Performance | 6038 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 15340 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4013 points | |
Help |
Gaming performance
For reasons that can't really be explained, the performance of The Witcher 3 at the lowest graphics settings remains clearly behind expectations - and also behind competitors with even weaker configurations - even after several test runs. The game can still be played well, but some potential is wasted. The device settles at around the MX350 average in the higher graphics settings, but it can't quite keep up with the Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T. In the second highest graphics setting, the title gradually no longer runs smoothly, while there are no problems at all in the second lowest setting.
Less demanding games like DOTA 2 run more than smoothly in all tested settings. Xplane 11 shows a similar picture as The Witcher 3. Overall, the Acer Aspire 5 A517 is certainly not a gaming laptop. However, it's suitable for one or two rounds if the game or the graphics settings aren't too demanding.
The Witcher 3 | |
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T | |
Average of class Office (7.82 - 106.3, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (35.2 - 51.9, n=13) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (20.6 - 29.9, n=13) | |
Average of class Office (3.49 - 59.1, n=104, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (10.1 - 17.5, n=12) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 | |
Average of class Office (2.66 - 34, n=110, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 54.9 | 42.27 | 24.67 | 15.1 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 124 | 94.6 | 73.9 | 65.8 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 49.1 | 35.5 | 30.2 |
Emissions
Noise emissions
Under load, the Aspire 5 A517's fan is very audible at almost 45 dB(A), and it's constantly hissing in the user's ears. After more demanding tasks, such as a gaming round, it sometimes continues to run for a few more minutes even after closing the device in order to cool it down, which leads to unnecessary noise emissions and literally contradicts the Windows "idle mode".
However, the laptop is pleasantly quiet under low load at about 25 dB(A) and is hardly noticeable here. Other bothersome noises like whirring transistors or the like didn't arise in our test device.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.9 / 24.9 / 27 dB(A) |
Load |
| 44.1 / 44.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.9 dB(A) |
Temperature
In idle mode, the device hardly gets warmer than the ambient temperature at an average of about 24 °C (~75.2 °F). Even under maximum load, the temperature at the top is kept within limits at a maximum of 35 °C (~95 °F), so the device never gets uncomfortably hot and can still be used well. The warmest spot is in the center between the hinges of the screen in all load conditions. This doesn't come as a surprise, since the hot exhaust air is blown out through a vent there.
The device survived our standard stress test, in which the tools Prime95 and FurMark run for at least an hour, without any problems. The processor remained at a relatively constant level. The graphics card lost some performance over time and dropped by around 150 MHz from a starting value of just under 1,200 MHz in the course of the test. The system didn't reveal any weaknesses under this exceptional load. However, the rather loud fan was once again a negative factor the whole time.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.1 °C / 75.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+3.6 °C / 6.5 F).
Speakers
Acer equips the Aspire 5 A517 with stereo speakers. As with the vast majority of devices, they can't compete with the 2016 Apple MacBook 12 reference model by a long shot, but they offer a somewhat acceptable sound.
Overall, the speakers don't reach particularly high volume levels, and they also lack bass almost completely. However, mids and trebles are rendered in a balanced way. The integrated speakers are sufficient for video conferences and the like. However, users who want to listen to music while working or doing other things or who want to play games on the device should use an external solution like headphones or speakers.
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Energy management
Energy consumption
The Aspire 5 A517's power consumption is at an average level for 17-inch devices. It consumes a bit more than, for example, the Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T in idle mode. In return, it drains the battery a bit less under load, but it still comes close to the 65-watt power adapter's power limit. We would have wished for a slightly higher capacity here. However, battery life is more important, and we'll get to that in the following section.
Off / Standby | 0.2 / 0.3 Watt |
Idle | 4.1 / 7.8 / 10 Watt |
Load |
47 / 64.7 Watt |
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | HP 17-ca1149ng R5 3500U, Vega 8, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H i5-10300H, UHD Graphics 630, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 17.30 | Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -19% | -14% | -2% | 18% | 7% | -6% | 6% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 6 -46% | 3.7 10% | 3.8 7% | 3.3 20% | 3 27% | 3.97 ? 3% | 4.3 ? -5% |
Idle Average * | 7.8 | 12.5 -60% | 8.3 -6% | 8.4 -8% | 8.4 -8% | 6.4 18% | 8.26 ? -6% | 7.35 ? 6% |
Idle Maximum * | 10 | 12.9 -29% | 11.3 -13% | 8.5 15% | 8.9 11% | 7.9 21% | 10.7 ? -7% | 9.15 ? 8% |
Load Average * | 47 | 41 13% | 44 6% | 60 -28% | 30.1 36% | 59 -26% | 55.2 ? -17% | 41.1 ? 13% |
Load Maximum * | 64.7 | 46 29% | 109 -68% | 62.2 4% | 45.4 30% | 68 -5% | 65.8 ? -2% | 58.1 ? 10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 56 | 48 |
* ... smaller is better
Battery life
Acer uses the large case of the 17.3-inch device to install a 50.2 Wh battery. This is necessary, because the large display consumes more energy than smaller models.
Overall, the device shows solid results in the various battery life tests. For example, it can leave the smaller 15.6-inch Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A behind. Compared to the Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T, it lasts about an hour less in the WLAN test with 441 minutes. The review sample simply can't keep up with the Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H battery wonder, but it also has a different price and configuration.
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350, 50.2 Wh | HP 17-ca1149ng R5 3500U, Vega 8, 41.7 Wh | Dell XPS 17 9700 i5-10300H i5-10300H, UHD Graphics 630, 97 Wh | Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-72MD i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 36.7 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 48.85 Wh | Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350, 50 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -18% | 126% | -29% | -7% | 14% | 67% | |
Reader / Idle | 827 | 657 -21% | 1436 ? 74% | ||||
H.264 | 292 | 385 32% | 1107 279% | 705 ? 141% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 441.4 | 294 -33% | 912 107% | 314 -29% | 416 -6% | 504 14% | 594 ? 35% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 77 | 152 ? 97% | |||||
Load | 133 | 67 -50% | 121 -9% | 122 -8% | 117.7 ? -12% |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
The Acer Aspire 5 A517 laptop shows the expected strengths in the test. Besides the usual high build quality, the configuration convinces in most benchmarks and tests.
The combination of CPU, GPU, and RAM is absolutely sufficient for the everyday office and browsing tasks of a laptop. It also renders the odd game passably if the requirements aren't too high.
We liked the matte display in the test as well as the fairly manageable dimensions despite the screen size. It can also be used outdoors, even if it's certainly not a laptop designed for mobility. Apart from a few points of criticism, the device performs well for both work and leisure. However, according to our test impressions, its cooling system could be a bit quieter under load. The Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5 is worth its price judging by our impressions.
Price and availability
At the time of writing, only a model of the Aspire 5 A517 with 512 GB of SSD storage seems to be available in the United States. It also omits the dedicated MX350 GPU and just comes with the Iris Xe Graphics instead. You can find it on Amazon for $929.99.
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
-
03/09/2021 v7
Marcus Schwarten