Notebookcheck

HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 Workstation Review: Vapor Chamber for Maximum Performance

Fast and Fury(ous). 10 percent lighter and 12 percent smaller than the previous generation ZBook 15 G6, the ZBook 15 G7 is a huge overhaul that doesn't sacrifice key workstation features just for the sake of style.

The HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 is is the company's flagship 15.6-inch mobile workstation designed for high-performance CAD users and professionals. Unlike the thinner ZBook 15u or Firefly series, the ZBook Fury 15 utilizes much faster Intel H-series CPUs with higher-end GeForce RTX GPU options instead of the slower Intel U-series with Quadro P GPUs.

A wide range of configurations are available ranging from the Core i5-10300H CPU up to the Xeon W-10885M, 16 GB of RAM up to 128 GB, 1080p 250 nit display up to 4K UHD 600 nits, and the Quadro T2000 Max-Q GPU up to the RTX 5000 Max-Q. The full specifications list can be found on HP's official datasheet here. The unit we have on hand in a higher-end configuration with the Xeon CPU, 4K display, and Quadr RTX 5000 Max-Q GPU for approximately $6100 USD.

Alternatives to the ZBook Fury 15 G7 include other high-end 15.6-inch workstations like the Dell Precision 7550, Lenovo ThinkPad P series, Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15, or the MSI WS66.

More HP reviews:

HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Processor
Intel Xeon W-10885M 8 x 2.4 - 5.3 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q - 16384 MB, Core: 600 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 27.21.14.6089, Optimus
Memory
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel, 4x SODIMM
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, LG Philips LGD0661, IPS, DreamColor, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel WM490 (Comet Lake PCH-H)
Storage
Soundcard
Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SD reader, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC
Networking
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 25.9 x 357 x 242.5 ( = 1.02 x 14.06 x 9.55 in)
Battery
94 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 8-cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, HP Client Security Manager, Support Assistant, Audio Control, Sure Click, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
2.438 kg ( = 86 oz / 5.37 pounds), Power Supply: 636 g ( = 22.43 oz / 1.4 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
90 %
01/2021
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
W-10885M, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
2.4 kg25.9 mm15.60"3840x2160
83 %
11/2020
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
2 kg18.9 mm15.60"3840x2160
83 %
08/2020
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
i9-10980HK, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
2.3 kg19.8 mm15.60"1920x1080
88 %
08/2020
Dell Precision 7550
W-10885M, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
2.8 kg27.36 mm15.60"3840x2160
87 %
08/2020
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
i7-10875H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
2.2 kg13.98 mm15.60"3840x2160
88 %
08/2019
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
i7-9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
1.7 kg18.4 mm15.60"1920x1080

Case

It's been a few years since we last checked out a full-size ZBook 15 and a lot has changed. HP has redesigned the chassis from head to toe with sharper looks without sacrificing a lot of the features that thinner workstations tend to omit like smart card readers, pointing stick nub, and dedicated mouse buttons. HP says the top, side, and bottom bezels are 59.7 percent, 53.1 percent, and 10.6 percent smaller, respectively, than the outgoing ZBook 15 G6. The base is firm with little to no warping or creaking including the keyboard center which is where most laptops are weakest. The lid flexes a little bit more but not enough to be of any concern.

The HP is noticeably lighter than the Precision 7550 by about 400 g despite their similar dimensions. The Dell system feels sounder, however, likely due to its more massive weight. There are plenty of ultrathin Nvidia Studio workstations like the Razer Blade or MSI WS66 that are designed to be even thinner and lighter if users want something more portable.

Strong magnesium alloy chassis with defined edges and corners
Strong magnesium alloy chassis with defined edges and corners
Matte surface is slightly roughened to deter fingerprint buildup
Matte surface is slightly roughened to deter fingerprint buildup
Hinges open all the way to 180 degrees. Rigidity feels uniform at all angles with only minor teetering
Hinges open all the way to 180 degrees. Rigidity feels uniform at all angles with only minor teetering
Audio is hindered if the lid is closed since the speaker grilles face upwards
Audio is hindered if the lid is closed since the speaker grilles face upwards
Bottom panel can be removed with just the flip of a switch
Bottom panel can be removed with just the flip of a switch
A boxy yet sharp visual design
A boxy yet sharp visual design
360 mm / 14.2 inch 242 mm / 9.53 inch 27.36 mm / 1.077 inch 2.8 kg6.23 lbs357 mm / 14.1 inch 242.5 mm / 9.55 inch 25.9 mm / 1.02 inch 2.4 kg5.37 lbs361.8 mm / 14.2 inch 245.7 mm / 9.67 inch 18.4 mm / 0.724 inch 1.7 kg3.79 lbs360 mm / 14.2 inch 252 mm / 9.92 inch 18.9 mm / 0.744 inch 2 kg4.41 lbs358 mm / 14.1 inch 248 mm / 9.76 inch 19.8 mm / 0.78 inch 2.3 kg4.99 lbs355 mm / 14 inch 235 mm / 9.25 inch 13.98 mm / 0.55 inch 2.2 kg4.87 lbs

Connectivity

Port options are plentiful and identical to the Dell Precision 7550. Port positioning is more accessible on the HP since there are none along the rear edge.

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: SD card reader, HDMI 2.0b, Mini DisplayPort 1.4, 2x USB-C w/ Thunderbolt 3, AC adapter
Right: SD card reader, HDMI 2.0b, Mini DisplayPort 1.4, 2x USB-C w/ Thunderbolt 3, AC adapter
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: Gigabit Ethernet, HP Security lock, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen. 1, 3.5 mm combo audio, Smart Card reader
Left: Gigabit Ethernet, HP Security lock, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen. 1, 3.5 mm combo audio, Smart Card reader

SD Card Reader

The integrated SD card reader offers fast transfer rates. Moving 1 GB of images from our UHS-II card to desktop takes about 6 seconds to be in line with most other high-end workstations.

Fully inserted SD reader protrudes slightly for easy ejecting and safe transporting
Fully inserted SD reader protrudes slightly for easy ejecting and safe transporting
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
219.7 MB/s ∼100% +29%
Dell Precision 7550
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
188.2 MB/s ∼86% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
181 MB/s ∼82% +6%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
170 MB/s ∼77%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77.3 MB/s ∼35% -55%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
211.4 MB/s ∼100% +2%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
206.5 MB/s ∼98%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198.2 MB/s ∼94% -4%
Dell Precision 7550
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
196.4 MB/s ∼93% -5%

Communication

The Intel AX201 comes standard for Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.1 connectivity. We experienced no issues when paired to our Netgear RAX200 test router. Average transfer rates will vary depending on the environment.

Accessible M.2 WLAN module
Accessible M.2 WLAN module
Empty space for WAN module. Interestingly, the antenna are present even though our SKU doesn't support the feature
Empty space for WAN module. Interestingly, the antenna are present even though our SKU doesn't support the feature
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1368 (735min - 1454max) MBit/s ∼100% +56%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1353 (1259min - 1416max) MBit/s ∼99% +54%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1316 (579min - 1479max) MBit/s ∼96% +50%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
899 (873min - 913max) MBit/s ∼66% +3%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
876 (448min - 896max) MBit/s ∼64%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
625 MBit/s ∼46% -29%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1595 (1327min - 1824max) MBit/s ∼100% +89%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1476 (1355min - 1581max) MBit/s ∼93% +75%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1346 (1260min - 1382max) MBit/s ∼84% +60%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1011 (507min - 1065max) MBit/s ∼63% +20%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
843 (792min - 896max) MBit/s ∼53%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
706 MBit/s ∼44% -16%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850448874868886878876883890896860883866877870878873860880884859878850847874896866888872864893448874868886878876883890896860883866877870878873860880884859878850847874896866888872864893849866841849849830838881840830807842838854827821862816845889803896852871819860846792835854Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø861 (448-896)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø843 (792-896)

Webcam

Physical webcam shutter off
Physical webcam shutter off
Physical webcam shutter on
Physical webcam shutter on
ColorChecker
18 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
18 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
ColorChecker HP ZBook Fury 15 G7: 13.16 ∆E min: 3.02 - max: 26.72 ∆E

Maintenance

HP advertises "tool-less" servicing because the bottom panel and main battery can be easily removed by disengaging a couple of latches. We absolutely love this approach and we think more OEMs should implement something similar for their professional laptops. Unfortunately, there is one big caveat: a screwdriver is still required to actually access almost anything else. RAM and storage are behind additional shielding meaning the "tool-less" design is not entirely accurate.

Furthermore, the screws securing the RAM and SSD slots are tight and soft meaning they can cam out more easily. We've disassembled plenty of laptops in our labs and the screws on this HP are more difficult to remove.

The battery can be removed without any tools while everything else will require a Philips screwdriver
The battery can be removed without any tools while everything else will require a Philips screwdriver
Additional storage bays underneath the removable battery
Additional storage bays underneath the removable battery

Accessories and Warranty

There are no extras in the box other than the usual paperwork and AC adapter. Nonetheless, there are plenty of optional docking stations and accessories including the HP Thunderbolt Dock.

A three-year limited warranty comes standard with extension options if ordered directly from HP.

Input Devices

Keyboard

The keyboards on HP Spectre, EliteBook, and ZBook laptops are some of the best in their respective categories. Feedback is crisp with relatively deep travel so it doesn't feel like you're typing on a thin Ultrabook with shallow keys. Clatter is also relatively quiet save for the louder Space key. The fact that the base is so dense helps each key feel uniform from corner to corner.

A new feature of the keyboard is its customizable F12 key which can also be found on the latest Envy and Spectre laptops. Users can set the key to quickly launch programs, files, folders, or websites. It does not, however, support macros which we think is a huge oversight.

Touchpad

The touchpad here is one of the best we've used on any 15.6-inch workstation. It's firm with smooth gliding properties and only a bit of sticking at slower speeds. Surface area is also larger than on the Precision 7550 (12.5 x 6 cm vs. 10 x 6.5 cm) while offering more dedicated mouse buttons.

Feedback from the dedicated buttons is also satisfying with deeper travel than on most laptops. Clatter is moderate but not loud enough to be annoying. Feedback doesn't feel uniform between each key, however, as the bottom right key feels a bit softer than the rest of the keys.

Similar font as on the Spectre x360 15 but with different secondary functions and longer Up/Dn arrow keys
Similar font as on the Spectre x360 15 but with different secondary functions and longer Up/Dn arrow keys
The large keys are easy to press. However, we do find them to be slightly on the spongy side
The large keys are easy to press. However, we do find them to be slightly on the spongy side
Key feedback is excellent and relatively quiet at the same time
Key feedback is excellent and relatively quiet at the same time
NumPad keys are slightly narrower and more cramped than the main QWERTY keys
NumPad keys are slightly narrower and more cramped than the main QWERTY keys

Display

HP offers a deluge of display options — 13, in fact — ranging from FHD to 4K, 250 nits to 1000 nits, touchscreen and no touchscreen, and everything in between. Our measurements and impressions below reflect only the 4K UHD HDR400 DreamColor non-touch panel as the other panels will almost surely have different attributes.

HWiNFO is unable to to pull the exact panel name of our unit and can only return the LG Philips LGD0661 controller. Nonetheless, we can confirm the high contrast ratio and 600 nit display to be brighter than most other workstations.

No edge-to-edge glass or touchscreen options
No edge-to-edge glass or touchscreen options
Narrow side bezels with thicker top and bottom bezels
Narrow side bezels with thicker top and bottom bezels
Matte sub[ixels are slightly less crisp than a glossy solution
Matte sub[ixels are slightly less crisp than a glossy solution
Minor uneven backlight bleeding along the top edge
Minor uneven backlight bleeding along the top edge
689
cd/m²
651.5
cd/m²
634.5
cd/m²
712.8
cd/m²
672.8
cd/m²
687
cd/m²
671.5
cd/m²
660.3
cd/m²
684.3
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips LGD0661
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 712.8 cd/m² Average: 673.7 cd/m² Minimum: 32.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 672.8 cd/m²
Contrast: 1346:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.48 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 3.03
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 75.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.04
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
LG Philips LGD0661, IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
AU Optronics B156HAB03.0, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Dell Precision 7550
AU Optronics B156ZAN, IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 15.60, 3840x2160
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
N156HCE-GN1, IPS LED, 15.60, 1920x1080
Response Times
-1%
20%
8%
91%
50%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
56 (27.6, 28.4)
58 (27, 31)
-4%
44.8 (21.2, 23.6)
20%
51.2 (24.4, 26.8)
9%
4 (2, 2)
93%
34.4 (17.2, 17.2)
39%
Response Time Black / White *
36 (20.4, 15.6)
35 (20, 15)
3%
28.8 (17.2, 11.6)
20%
34 (20, 14)
6%
4 (2, 2)
89%
14 (4.4, 9.6)
61%
PWM Frequency
26040 (70)
Screen
1%
-16%
-19%
126%
-4%
Brightness middle
672.8
344
-49%
374.5
-44%
473.5
-30%
380
-44%
542
-19%
Brightness
674
335
-50%
363
-46%
461
-32%
388
-42%
528
-22%
Brightness Distribution
89
93
4%
91
2%
90
1%
93
4%
84
-6%
Black Level *
0.5
0.37
26%
0.42
16%
0.55
-10%
0.018
96%
0.41
18%
Contrast
1346
930
-31%
892
-34%
861
-36%
21111
1468%
1322
-2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.48
1.76
49%
4.05
-16%
4.8
-38%
5.47
-57%
3.5
-1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.44
4.31
54%
8.17
13%
8.73
8%
8.19
13%
7.8
17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.03
4.36
-44%
3.08
-2%
3.04
-0%
1.3
57%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.1
3.12
-1%
2.6
16%
5.6
-81%
5.3
-71%
4.8
-55%
Gamma
2.04 108%
2.2 100%
2.21 100%
2.34 94%
2.15 102%
2.33 94%
CCT
6380 102%
6563 99%
7027 93%
7549 86%
6128 106%
7690 85%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
75.2
85
13%
56.4
-25%
86.4
15%
86
14%
58.8
-22%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
98
-2%
86.3
-14%
99.7
0%
100
0%
91.1
-9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
0% / 1%
2% / -10%
-6% / -15%
109% / 120%
23% / 4%

* ... smaller is better

Color space covers all of sRGB and DCI-P3. When compared to AdobeRGB, DCI-P3 covers more yellow and reds which our images below can confirm for our ZBook.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

X-Rite colorimeter measurements show color temperature to be slightly on the warm side. Calibrating the display ourselves addresses the small issue for flatter RGB balance and gamma curves. HP offers no pre-installed color management software unlike Dell and its Premier Color software.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27.6 ms rise
↘ 28.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9686 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Outdoor visibility is good if under shade especially because the display is significantly brighter than the average 15.6-inch laptop or workstation. Direct sunlight will still wash out the screen, however.

Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under sunlight
Wide IPS viewing angles. Colors and contrast shift if viewing from extreme angles
Wide IPS viewing angles. Colors and contrast shift if viewing from extreme angles

Performance

As a fully featured mobile workstation, the ZBook Fury 15 can be equipped with the Core i9-10885H or Xeon W-10885M for ECC RAM support. It's worth noting that users can configure up to 128 GB of non-ECC RAM while ECC will be limited to 64 GB. Professionals who aren't power users may prefer the smaller and more portable HP ZBook Firefly instead.

Our unit was set to High Performance mode via Windows prior to running all benchmarks benchmarks below for the highest possible scores.

Processor

Raw multi-thread performance is slower than expected at about 30 percent slower than the Precision 7550 equipped with the same Xeon CPU. Turbo Boost benefits are minimal as shown by our CineBench R15 xT loop test results below.

Performance improves significantly after updating the BIOS to 1.04.01 likely due to a bug with our older BIOS version. Raw multi-thread performance would jump by almost 50 percent to be more in line with the aforementioned Dell. This comes at a cost, however, which our Stress Test section below will detail.

085170255340425510595680765850935102011051190127513601445153016151628.271577.61590.011578.411581.281591.791586.731570.661573.071573.941576.61583.971566.911579.591571.651569.861580.471583.971566.481561.521562.191558.851580.781566.421578.781562.991569.31571.221563.051567.091571.831578.531560.311567.891580.721577.911581.41566.351571.961570.781573.191567.581577.471570.231552.671554.121559.941562.51572.331566.351047.231058.431070.691080.031081.021079.391084.451088.611083.481086.721078.811083.161076.921076.171084.921086.191065.811083.751081.841085.981078.551074.551078.341082.91082.221080.611075.791079.041078.781078.021081.961078.951083.481080.671082.61082.131079.11088.671075.11074.661077.851082.871088.491082.661081.081071.211075.851077.731079.911081.141263.861157.071170.821123.281156.041154.971167.611158.141151.871157.781157.611155.541157.071148.771138.531149.291145.181144.131128.991159.191162.861163.911144.161162.861158.821166.591145.281133.51164.961148.241162.321126.061113.7711281150.851158.111134.531162.351144.131149.791148.341153.931156.041132.51153.971139.111156.541118.161170.281143.741584.741238.212401246.071252.151251.531250.311250.91246.961252.741234.611246.031247.8612341247.861242.391233.431252.741233.431236.441252.151252.741248.481234.031249.11249.061247.351243.051238.811248.481252.111251.531241.811244.211251.531246.031246.031240.621249.061249.11652.141604.621609.011603.531609.791589.641613.681604.361602.441604.171604.171577.911607.21602.891607.071608.171608.31605.911602.051607.461605.911604.31605.851607.141612.321610.371608.431605.651607.071608.041604.361609.591608.881611.541608.361607.591606.551597.381602.821605.591603.851608.691598.151599.11604.561612.191601.921609.461609.851607.011628.271577.61590.011578.411581.281591.791586.731570.661573.071573.941576.61583.971566.911579.591571.651569.861580.471583.971566.481561.521562.191558.851580.781566.421578.781562.991569.31571.221563.051567.091571.831578.531560.311567.891580.721577.911581.41566.351571.961570.781573.191567.581577.471570.231552.671554.121559.941562.51572.331566.351047.231058.431070.691080.031081.021079.391084.451088.611083.481086.721078.811083.161076.921076.171084.921086.191065.811083.751081.841085.981078.551074.551078.341082.91082.221080.611075.791079.041078.781078.021081.961078.951083.481080.671082.61082.131079.11088.671075.11074.661077.851082.871088.491082.661081.081071.211075.851077.731079.911081.141263.861157.071170.821123.281156.041154.971167.611158.141151.871157.781157.611155.541157.071148.771138.531149.291145.181144.131128.991159.191162.861163.911144.161162.861158.821166.591145.281133.51164.961148.241162.321126.061113.7711281150.851158.111134.531162.351144.131149.791148.341153.931156.041132.51153.971139.111156.541118.161170.281143.741584.741238.212401246.071252.151251.531250.311250.91246.961252.741234.611246.031247.8612341247.861242.391233.431252.741233.431236.441252.151252.741248.481234.031249.11249.061247.351243.051238.811248.481252.111251.531241.811244.211251.531246.031246.031240.621249.061249.11652.141604.621609.011603.531609.791589.641613.681604.361602.441604.171604.171577.911607.21602.891607.071608.171608.31605.911602.051607.461605.911604.31605.851607.141612.321610.371608.431605.651607.071608.041604.361609.591608.881611.541608.361607.591606.551597.381602.821605.591603.851608.691598.151599.11604.561612.191601.921609.461609.851607.011628.271577.61590.011578.411581.281591.791586.731570.661573.071573.941576.61583.971566.911579.591571.651569.861580.471583.971566.481561.521562.191558.851580.781566.421578.781562.991569.31571.221563.051567.091571.831578.531560.311567.891580.721577.911581.41566.351571.961570.781573.191567.581577.471570.231552.671554.121559.941562.51572.331566.351047.231058.431070.691080.031081.021079.391084.451088.611083.481086.721078.811083.161076.921076.171084.921086.191065.811083.751081.841085.981078.551074.551078.341082.91082.221080.611075.791079.041078.781078.021081.961078.951083.481080.671082.61082.131079.11088.671075.11074.661077.851082.871088.491082.661081.081071.211075.851077.731079.911081.141263.861157.071170.821123.281156.041154.971167.611158.141151.871157.781157.611155.541157.071148.771138.531149.291145.181144.131128.991159.191162.861163.911144.161162.861158.821166.591145.281133.51164.961148.241162.321126.061113.7711281150.851158.111134.531162.351144.131149.791148.341153.931156.041132.51153.971139.111156.541118.161170.281143.741584.741238.212401246.071252.151251.531250.311250.91246.961252.741234.611246.031247.8612341247.861242.391233.431252.741233.431236.441252.151252.741248.481234.031249.11249.061247.351243.051238.811248.481252.111251.531241.811244.211251.531246.031246.031240.621249.061249.11652.141604.621609.011603.531609.791589.641613.681604.361602.441604.171604.171577.911607.21602.891607.071608.171608.31605.911602.051607.461605.911604.31605.851607.141612.321610.371608.431605.651607.071608.041604.361609.591608.881611.541608.361607.591606.551597.381602.821605.591603.851608.691598.151599.11604.561612.191601.921609.461609.851607.01Tooltip
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 Intel Xeon W-10885M; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1573 (1552.67-1628.27)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 Intel Xeon W-10885M; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1079 (1047.23-1088.67)
Dell Precision 3000 3551 Intel Core i9-10885H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1152 (1113.77-1263.86)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro Intel Core i9-9980HK; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1254 (1233.43-1584.74)
Dell Precision 7550 Intel Xeon W-10885M; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1606 (1577.91-1652.14)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
4161 Points ∼100% +9%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
3835 Points ∼92%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
2727 Points ∼66% -29%
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (2727 - 4065, n=4)
3639 Points ∼87% -5%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
3429 Points ∼82% -11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3224 Points ∼77% -16%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
3133 Points ∼75% -18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen3-20TLS0UV00
Intel Core i7-10750H
2827 Points ∼68% -26%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
2798 Points ∼67% -27%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
2107 Points ∼51% -45%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
502 Points ∼100%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
499 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
500 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (488 - 502, n=4)
495 Points ∼99% -1%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
492 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen3-20TLS0UV00
Intel Core i7-10750H
488 Points ∼97% -3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
462 Points ∼92% -8%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
460 Points ∼92% -8%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
446 Points ∼89% -11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
428 Points ∼85% -15%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1714 (1647.11min - 1843.74max) Points ∼100% +5%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1628 (1552.67min - 1628.27max) Points ∼95%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1089 (1047.23min - 1088.67max) Points ∼64% -33%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
1519 (1188.78min - 1518.72max) Points ∼89% -7%
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (1089 - 1666, n=4)
1509 Points ∼88% -7%
Dell Precision 5540
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1407 (1126.13min - 1407max) Points ∼82% -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1398 (1313.46min - 1397.77max) Points ∼82% -14%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
1282 Points ∼75% -21%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
1264 (1113.77min - 1263.86max) Points ∼74% -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen3-20TLS0UV00
Intel Core i7-10750H
1257 (1166.86min - 1256.76max) Points ∼73% -23%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
889 (827.87min - 893.75max) Points ∼52% -45%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
211 Points ∼100%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
209 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
210 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (208 - 211, n=4)
210 Points ∼100% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen3-20TLS0UV00
Intel Core i7-10750H
205 Points ∼97% -3%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
203 Points ∼96% -4%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
197 Points ∼93% -7%
Dell Precision 5540
Intel Core i9-9980HK
193 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
188 Points ∼89% -11%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
186 Points ∼88% -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
178 Points ∼84% -16%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
508 Seconds * ∼100% -23%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
435.2 Seconds * ∼86% -6%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
412 Seconds * ∼81%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen3-20TLS0UV00
Intel Core i7-10750H
375 Seconds * ∼74% +9%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
351 Seconds * ∼69% +15%
Dell Precision 5540
Intel Core i9-9980HK
348.4 Seconds * ∼69% +15%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
348 Seconds * ∼69% +16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
345 Seconds * ∼68% +16%
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (281 - 412, n=3)
326 Seconds * ∼64% +21%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
273 Seconds * ∼54% +34%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
5703 MIPS ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (5495 - 5703, n=3)
5568 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
5397 MIPS ∼95% -5%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
5379 MIPS ∼94% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen3-20TLS0UV00
Intel Core i7-10750H
5341 MIPS ∼94% -6%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5335 MIPS ∼94% -6%
Dell Precision 5540
Intel Core i9-9980HK
5283 MIPS ∼93% -7%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
4889 MIPS ∼86% -14%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
4865 MIPS ∼85% -15%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4471 MIPS ∼78% -22%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
48730 MIPS ∼100% +35%
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (36204 - 48044, n=3)
43315 MIPS ∼89% +20%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
39599 MIPS ∼81% +9%
Dell Precision 5540
Intel Core i9-9980HK
39566 MIPS ∼81% +9%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
36740 MIPS ∼75% +1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
36693 MIPS ∼75% +1%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
36204 MIPS ∼74%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen3-20TLS0UV00
Intel Core i7-10750H
34433 MIPS ∼71% -5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
32555 MIPS ∼67% -10%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
24388 MIPS ∼50% -33%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1341 Points ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1340 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (1331 - 1347, n=3)
1339 Points ∼100% 0%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
1323 Points ∼99% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen3-20TLS0UV00
Intel Core i7-10750H
1300 Points ∼97% -3%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
1216 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
1207 Points ∼90% -10%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
1183 Points ∼88% -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1108 Points ∼83% -17%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
8393 Points ∼100% +21%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8347 Points ∼99% +20%
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (6948 - 8491, n=3)
7939 Points ∼95% +14%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
6948 Points ∼83%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
6914 Points ∼82% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
5813 Points ∼69% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen3-20TLS0UV00
Intel Core i7-10750H
5650 Points ∼67% -19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
5260 Points ∼63% -24%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
4399 Points ∼52% -37%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
13 fps ∼100% +46%
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (8.89 - 13.6, n=3)
11.9 fps ∼92% +34%
Dell Precision 5540
Intel Core i9-9980HK
10.8 fps ∼83% +21%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
10.6 fps ∼82% +19%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
10.4 fps ∼80% +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen3-20TLS0UV00
Intel Core i7-10750H
9.45 fps ∼73% +6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
9.27 fps ∼71% +4%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
8.89 fps ∼68%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
8.3 fps ∼64% -7%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
7.28 fps ∼56% -18%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
64.1 s * ∼100% -10%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
63.6 s * ∼99% -9%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
59.75 s * ∼93% -3%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
58.1 s * ∼91%
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (44.4 - 58.1, n=3)
49.7 s * ∼78% +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen3-20TLS0UV00
Intel Core i7-10750H
49 s * ∼76% +16%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
45.9 s * ∼72% +21%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
44 s * ∼69% +24%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
43 s * ∼67% +26%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.646 sec * ∼100% -17%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
0.643 sec * ∼100% -17%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
0.626 sec * ∼97% -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen3-20TLS0UV00
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.597 sec * ∼92% -8%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.589 sec * ∼91% -7%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.574 sec * ∼89% -4%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
0.572 sec * ∼89% -4%
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (0.551 - 0.57, n=3)
0.563 sec * ∼87% -2%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
0.551 sec * ∼85%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1628 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
227 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
209 Points
Help

System Performance

PCMark benchmarks are where we expect them to be relative to other mobile workstations. The Precision 7550, which comes with the exact same CPU and GPU as our HP, is able to edge out our system by mere percentage points.

PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
7360 Points ∼47% +1%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7269 Points ∼47%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5640 Points ∼36% -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5033 Points ∼32% -31%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4962 Points ∼32% -32%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4563 Points ∼29% -37%
Productivity
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8877 Points ∼80% +20%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7796 Points ∼70% +6%
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
7735 Points ∼69% +5%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7384 Points ∼66%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
7243 Points ∼65% -2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7205 Points ∼65% -2%
Essentials
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
10829 Points ∼95% +14%
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
9811 Points ∼86% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
9566 Points ∼84% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9530 Points ∼83%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8890 Points ∼78% -7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8809 Points ∼77% -8%
Score
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
5904 Points ∼67% +3%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5846 Points ∼67% +2%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5733 Points ∼65%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5046 Points ∼57% -12%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4884 Points ∼56% -15%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4877 Points ∼56% -15%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5629 Points ∼82% +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5332 Points ∼78% +5%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5099 Points ∼75%
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
4726 Points ∼69% -7%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4638 Points ∼68% -9%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4436 Points ∼65% -13%
Home Score Accelerated v2
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
4418 Points ∼70% +6%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4175 Points ∼67%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
3986 Points ∼64% -5%
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
3781 Points ∼60% -9%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3654 Points ∼58% -12%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
3524 Points ∼56% -16%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4175 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5099 points
PCMark 10 Score
5733 points
Help

DPC Latency

LatencyMon reveals DPC latency issues when opening multiple browser tabs of our homepage even after several repeat tests. 4K video playback at 60 FPS is smooth but not perfect as we recorded 6 dropped frames during a minute-long YouTube video. 

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
10043.1 μs * ∼100% -68%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5965.18 μs * ∼59%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
3412.9 μs * ∼34% +43%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
1938.1 μs * ∼19% +68%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
715.7 μs * ∼7% +88%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

Our test unit comes with a 1 TB Samsung PM981a which is one of the fastest consumer-oriented PCIe 3 x4 NVMe SSDs available. Users can configure with other sizes or models with SED security if desired.

A total of four storage slots are available (3x M.2 2280 + 1x 2.5-inch SATA III). However, the 2.5-inch bay shares the same space as two of the M.2 slots meaning there is not enough room to install four drives. Users can install up to three M.2 drives or one M.2 drive plus one 2.5-inch drive.

Certain SKUs omit the 2.5-inch connector for an additional M.2 slot to support up to four M.2 drives simultaneously.

CDM 5.5
CDM 5.5
AS SSD
AS SSD
The primary M.2 2280 slot is accessible after removing the bottom panel and its aluminum cover
The primary M.2 2280 slot is accessible after removing the bottom panel and its aluminum cover
The other two M.2 2280 slots and single 2.5-inch SATA III bay are hidden underneath the battery. Note that installing an M.2 drive will preclude a 2.5-inch drive and vice versa. Mounting brackets were not included with our unit
The other two M.2 2280 slots and single 2.5-inch SATA III bay are hidden underneath the battery. Note that installing an M.2 drive will preclude a 2.5-inch drive and vice versa. Mounting brackets were not included with our unit
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Dell Precision 7550
SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
AS SSD
74%
29%
31%
49%
Copy Game MB/s
440.8
1624.51
269%
1476.6
235%
1139.5
159%
1449.2
229%
Copy Program MB/s
123.31
790.95
541%
627.09
409%
501.25
306%
597.27
384%
Copy ISO MB/s
2779.26
2588.93
-7%
1768.18
-36%
1981.66
-29%
2014.86
-28%
Score Total
4770
5630
18%
3801
-20%
4781
0%
4300
-10%
Score Write
2253
2601
15%
1762
-22%
2155
-4%
1871
-17%
Score Read
1687
1993
18%
1373
-19%
1726
2%
1634
-3%
Access Time Write *
0.099
0.068
31%
0.106
-7%
0.04
60%
0.024
76%
Access Time Read *
0.046
0.057
-24%
0.069
-50%
0.087
-89%
0.064
-39%
4K-64 Write
2012.49
2174.26
8%
1537.04
-24%
1841.59
-8%
1506.25
-25%
4K-64 Read
1419.72
1712.16
21%
1128.12
-21%
1480.51
4%
1290.93
-9%
4K Write
110.83
165.06
49%
105.49
-5%
88.16
-20%
155.44
40%
4K Read
54.84
48.57
-11%
42.31
-23%
47.13
-14%
45.05
-18%
Seq Write
1295.71
2619.99
102%
1192.77
-8%
2251.61
74%
2093.83
62%
Seq Read
2127.46
2321.37
9%
2027.61
-5%
1982.19
-7%
2980.03
40%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
12%
-9%
2%
1%
Write 4K
114.1
185.8
63%
121
6%
132.9
16%
162.2
42%
Read 4K
57.18
47.21
-17%
42.16
-26%
46.73
-18%
43.71
-24%
Write Seq
2580
2874
11%
2150
-17%
2214
-14%
2441
-5%
Read Seq
2527
1786
-29%
1755
-31%
2018
-20%
1753
-31%
Write 4K Q32T1
480.2
466.8
-3%
395.3
-18%
478.9
0%
397.6
-17%
Read 4K Q32T1
387.6
562.8
45%
381.8
-1%
540.2
39%
519.7
34%
Write Seq Q32T1
2996
3091
3%
2730
-9%
2975
-1%
2519
-16%
Read Seq Q32T1
2853
3395
19%
3468
22%
3195
12%
3448
21%
Write 4K Q8T8
1381.4
Read 4K Q8T8
1371.1
Total Average (Program / Settings)
43% / 51%
10% / 15%
17% / 20%
25% / 31%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2853 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2996 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 387.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 480.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2527 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2580 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57.18 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 114.1 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

015030045060075090010501200135015001650180019502100225024002550270028502806.042906.022906.862908.332909.382910.012910.222910.222910.692910.852911.062911.062911.062911.272911.272911.692911.692911.92911.92911.92911.92911.92911.92911.92911.92912.112912.112912.112912.312912.312912.522912.522912.522912.522912.732913.572913.572913.572913.572913.572913.992913.992913.992913.992913.992914.22914.22914.22914.622915.04Tooltip
: Ø2910 (2806.04-2915.04)

GPU Performance

The system utilizes a Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q GPU instead of the faster Quadro RTX 5000 Max-P which is able to offer up to 30 to 35 percent more performance than our Max-Q variant. Users who want maximum RTX 5000 performance should look into the larger Acer ConceptD 9 Pro instead.

Raw graphics performance is still excellent with benchmark results just shy of a Quadro RTX 4000 Max-P.

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
11294 Points ∼100% +52%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
9956 Points ∼88% +34%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
7766 Points ∼69% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H
7717 Points ∼68% +4%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
7443 Points ∼66%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (6999 - 7977, n=10)
7432 Points ∼66% 0%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
5405 Points ∼48% -27%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
3261 Points ∼29% -56%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
3122 Points ∼28% -58%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
3066 Points ∼27% -59%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H
2834 Points ∼25% -62%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
NVIDIA Quadro P620, i9-10885H
1393 Points ∼12% -81%
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10610U
997 Points ∼9% -87%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
938 Points ∼8% -87%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
10820 Points ∼100% +49%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
9779 Points ∼90% +34%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H
7901 Points ∼73% +9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
7683 Points ∼71% +6%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (6801 - 7920, n=10)
7289 Points ∼67% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
7276 Points ∼67%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
5737 Points ∼53% -21%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
3474 Points ∼32% -52%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
3356 Points ∼31% -54%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
3348 Points ∼31% -54%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H
3006 Points ∼28% -59%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
NVIDIA Quadro P620, i9-10885H
1593 Points ∼15% -78%
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10610U
1121 Points ∼10% -85%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
1039 Points ∼10% -86%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
27620 Points ∼100% +40%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
24354 Points ∼88% +23%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
21479 Points ∼78% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H
20079 Points ∼73% +2%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (18247 - 21115, n=10)
19825 Points ∼72% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
19759 Points ∼72%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
14328 Points ∼52% -27%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
8727 Points ∼32% -56%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
8416 Points ∼30% -57%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
8107 Points ∼29% -59%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H
7558 Points ∼27% -62%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
NVIDIA Quadro P620, i9-10885H
4600 Points ∼17% -77%
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10610U
3215 Points ∼12% -84%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
3088 Points ∼11% -84%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
16401 Points ∼100% +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H
16360 Points ∼100% +30%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
16148 Points ∼98% +28%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13644 Points ∼83% +8%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (11312 - 16451, n=9)
12752 Points ∼78% +1%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
12576 Points ∼77%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
11707 Points ∼71% -7%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
11416 Points ∼70% -9%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
11239 Points ∼69% -11%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
10098 Points ∼62% -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H
9227 Points ∼56% -27%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
NVIDIA Quadro P620, i9-10885H
6069 Points ∼37% -52%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
5318 Points ∼32% -58%
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10610U
3728 Points ∼23% -70%
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
37989 Points ∼100% +44%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
32999 Points ∼87% +25%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
28200 Points ∼74% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H
27002 Points ∼71% +2%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (24156 - 28524, n=9)
26602 Points ∼70% +1%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
26369 Points ∼69%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
19513 Points ∼51% -26%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
12132 Points ∼32% -54%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
11468 Points ∼30% -57%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
11454 Points ∼30% -57%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H
10407 Points ∼27% -61%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
NVIDIA Quadro P620, i9-10885H
5850 Points ∼15% -78%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
4256 Points ∼11% -84%
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10610U
4128 Points ∼11% -84%
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
203.8 fps ∼100% +43%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H
178.89 fps ∼88% +25%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
142.63 fps ∼70%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (120 - 159, n=8)
135 fps ∼66% -5%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
123.7 fps ∼61% -13%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
104.4 fps ∼51% -27%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
103.92 fps ∼51% -27%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
100.32 fps ∼49% -30%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
97.2 fps ∼48% -32%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H
89.18 fps ∼44% -37%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
NVIDIA Quadro P620, i9-10885H
86.71 fps ∼43% -39%
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10610U
62.79 fps ∼31% -56%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
44.6 fps ∼22% -69%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
465.3 fps ∼100% +63%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H
357.07 fps ∼77% +25%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (244 - 306, n=8)
287 fps ∼62% +1%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
285.08 fps ∼61%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
202.06 fps ∼43% -29%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
148.4 fps ∼32% -48%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
143.82 fps ∼31% -50%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
139.36 fps ∼30% -51%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H
127.83 fps ∼27% -55%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
NVIDIA Quadro P620, i9-10885H
89.03 fps ∼19% -69%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
66.07 fps ∼14% -77%
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10610U
49.5 fps ∼11% -83%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
21.7 fps ∼5% -92%
Showcase (showcase-02)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
127.1 fps ∼100% +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H
100.28 fps ∼79% +5%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
95.67 fps ∼75%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (89.2 - 98.7, n=8)
95.2 fps ∼75% 0%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
72.85 fps ∼57% -24%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
42.39 fps ∼33% -56%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
40.2 fps ∼32% -58%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
37.56 fps ∼30% -61%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H
35.27 fps ∼28% -63%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
NVIDIA Quadro P620, i9-10885H
25.28 fps ∼20% -74%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
19.38 fps ∼15% -80%
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10610U
13.98 fps ∼11% -85%
Medical (medical-02)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
133.4 fps ∼100% +47%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H
102.54 fps ∼77% +13%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
90.77 fps ∼68%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (79 - 103, n=8)
89.8 fps ∼67% -1%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
73.94 fps ∼55% -19%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
71.01 fps ∼53% -22%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
50.1 fps ∼38% -45%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
48.02 fps ∼36% -47%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
41.71 fps ∼31% -54%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H
33.45 fps ∼25% -63%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
NVIDIA Quadro P620, i9-10885H
25.1 fps ∼19% -72%
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10610U
19.06 fps ∼14% -79%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
11.8 fps ∼9% -87%
Maya (maya-05)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
340.8 fps ∼100% +70%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H
286.1 fps ∼84% +43%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (180 - 231, n=8)
206 fps ∼60% +3%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
200.49 fps ∼59%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
168.84 fps ∼50% -16%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
114.6 fps ∼34% -43%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
110.2 fps ∼32% -45%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
105.69 fps ∼31% -47%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H
101.04 fps ∼30% -50%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
NVIDIA Quadro P620, i9-10885H
68.29 fps ∼20% -66%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
45.21 fps ∼13% -77%
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10610U
40.31 fps ∼12% -80%
Energy (energy-02)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
57.3 fps ∼100% +44%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H
45.02 fps ∼79% +13%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
39.92 fps ∼70%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (35.4 - 39.9, n=8)
37.3 fps ∼65% -7%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
28.6 fps ∼50% -28%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
17.8 fps ∼31% -55%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
15.66 fps ∼27% -61%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
14.87 fps ∼26% -63%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H
12 fps ∼21% -70%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
NVIDIA Quadro P620, i9-10885H
8.07 fps ∼14% -80%
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10610U
6.55 fps ∼11% -84%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
2.15 fps ∼4% -95%
Creo (creo-02)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
319.8 fps ∼100% +43%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H
269.9 fps ∼84% +21%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
223.14 fps ∼70%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
220.34 fps ∼69% -1%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (182 - 238, n=8)
218 fps ∼68% -2%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
180.92 fps ∼57% -19%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
116.75 fps ∼37% -48%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
116.3 fps ∼36% -48%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
109.55 fps ∼34% -51%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H
99.93 fps ∼31% -55%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
NVIDIA Quadro P620, i9-10885H
66.15 fps ∼21% -70%
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10610U
45.17 fps ∼14% -80%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
44.68 fps ∼14% -80%
Catia (catia-05)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
338.9 fps ∼100% +50%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H
277.28 fps ∼82% +23%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
225.34 fps ∼66%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (187 - 260, n=8)
222 fps ∼66% -1%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
198.56 fps ∼59% -12%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
143.89 fps ∼42% -36%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
138.3 fps ∼41% -39%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
134.64 fps ∼40% -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H
121.33 fps ∼36% -46%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
NVIDIA Quadro P620, i9-10885H
76.55 fps ∼23% -66%
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10610U
48.08 fps ∼14% -79%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
45.35 fps ∼13% -80%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
232.2 fps ∼100% +31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H
184.29 fps ∼79% +4%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
176.8 fps ∼76%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (157 - 182, n=8)
175 fps ∼75% -1%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
136.23 fps ∼59% -23%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
101.9 fps ∼44% -42%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
93.32 fps ∼40% -47%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
88.95 fps ∼38% -50%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H
83.89 fps ∼36% -53%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
NVIDIA Quadro P620, i9-10885H
55.22 fps ∼24% -69%
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-10610U
34.3 fps ∼15% -81%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
32.36 fps ∼14% -82%
SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
230.1 fps ∼100% +81%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
127.29 fps ∼55%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (107 - 157, n=8)
126 fps ∼55% -1%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
113.8 fps ∼49% -11%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
111.89 fps ∼49% -12%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
100.76 fps ∼44% -21%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
93.96 fps ∼41% -26%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
NVIDIA Quadro P620, i9-10885H
93.87 fps ∼41% -26%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
70.14 fps ∼30% -45%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
41.43 fps ∼18% -67%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
258.1 fps ∼100% +114%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (121 - 165, n=8)
140 fps ∼54% +16%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
120.68 fps ∼47%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
102.96 fps ∼40% -15%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
82.7 fps ∼32% -31%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
74.58 fps ∼29% -38%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
74.47 fps ∼29% -38%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
NVIDIA Quadro P620, i9-10885H
49.5 fps ∼19% -59%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
35.12 fps ∼14% -71%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
12.08 fps ∼5% -90%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
126.4 fps ∼100% +26%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M
100.26 fps ∼79%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (89 - 100, n=8)
95.8 fps ∼76% -4%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
73.28 fps ∼58% -27%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
42.75 fps ∼34% -57%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
40.3 fps ∼32% -60%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
37.81 fps ∼30% -62%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
NVIDIA Quadro P620, i9-10885H
26.84 fps ∼21% -73%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
19.25 fps ∼15% -81%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
109.3 fps ∼100% +76%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
  (57.8 - 66.4, n=8)