Notebookcheck

Acer ConceptD 9 Pro in Review: Workstation convertible for creative professionals

Heavyweight. Acer's 17.3-inch workstation shines with a lot of performance, a 4K touchscreen display with an included Wacom stylus, and a Thunderbolt 3 port. The configuration is excellent otherwise as well: 32 GB of RAM, 16 GB of VRAM, NVMe SSD (1 TB).
Sascha Mölck, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Andrea Grüblinger (translated by Marius S.),

The Acer ConceptD 9 Pro is no ordinary 17.3-inch workstation. The rotating display can also be used as a graphics tablet. Sketches can be created with the help of the (included) Wacom digital stylus. The device is powered by a Core i9-9980HK CPU and a Quadro RTX 5000 GPU. There are no direct competitors in our database. Thus, we will use regular 17.3-inch workstations for comparison purposes. This includes devices such as the Lenovo ThinkPad P73, MSI WE75 9TK, Dell Precision 7730, Eurocom Tornado F7W and the Fujitsu Celsius H980.

Acer ConceptD 9 Pro (ConceptD 9 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-9980HK 8 x 2.4 - 5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H, unlocked
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) - 16384 MB, Core: 1350-1770 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, 256-bit memory interface, Nvidia 442.50, no Optimus
Memory
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2666, dual-channel, two RAM slots (both occupied)
Display
17.3 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, capacitive, 10 multi-touch points, native pen support, AU Optronics B173ZAN03.1, IPS, Pantone-validated, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM370
Storage
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00, 1024 GB 
, 904 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC289 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVS
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: microphone input, headphone output, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyroscope, TPM 2.0
Networking
Killer E3000 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 26.5 x 428 x 303.3 ( = 1.04 x 16.85 x 11.94 in)
Battery
71.9 Wh, 4570 mAh Lithium-Ion, 15.4 V
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: Full HD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: four speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Wacom digital pen (with two extra tips), MS Office 365 (trial version), Norton Security Ultra (trial version), 24 Months Warranty
Weight
4.5 kg ( = 158.73 oz / 9.92 pounds), Power Supply: 1.51 kg ( = 53.26 oz / 3.33 pounds)
Price
4500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86 %
03/2020
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
i9-9980HK, Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
4.5 kg26.5 mm17.3"3840x2160
87 %
12/2019
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
i7-9850H, Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
3.5 kg31 mm17.3"1920x1080
85 %
11/2019
MSI WE75 9TK
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
2.6 kg27.5 mm17.3"1920x1080
86 %
05/2019
Dell Precision 7730
i7-8850H, Quadro P3200
3.3 kg30 mm17.3"1920x1080
86 %
12/2018
Eurocom Tornado F7W
i9-9900K, Quadro P5200
4.2 kg51 mm17.3"3840x2160
85 %
02/2019
Fujitsu Celsius H980
i7-8750H, Quadro P3200
3.5 kg30 mm17.3"1920x1080

Chassis - Heavy Workstation

Acer went with a matte black metal chassis without any bells or whistles for the ConceptD 9 Pro. The keyboard has been relocated to the front of the base unit, in order to make room for various display positions. The touchpad is located to the right of the keyboard. Above the keyboard, there is a perforated area that facilitates airflow to the inside of the case.

The massive hinges of the device are quite striking. They hold the display firmly in place regardless of its operating mode to allow for comfortable pen inputs. The lid can be opened to a maximum angle of 110 to 120 degrees. The display can also be rotated by 170 degrees. In tablet mode, it does not lie flatly on the base unit. Instead, it is slightly angled towards the user. The lid can be opened one-handed (when closed).

The build quality of the laptop is good. The clearances are adequate and there are no excess materials. There are no flaws in terms of the stability, either. At worst, the base unit and the lid can only be twisted slightly. The base unit's rigidity is particularly good. Applying pressure to the back of the lid does not distort the image. The battery is fixed. There is no maintenance hatch. In order to get to the inside, the case needs to be opened. More on this later.

At 4.5 kg, the Acer workstation is not exactly a lightweight device. Most of the competitors we selected weigh around 1 or 2 kg less. The Eurocom Tornado F7W is the only other device to cross the 4-kg mark. It also should not come as a surprise that the dimensions of the ConceptD are larger than those of most of its competitors. The Tornado F7W has the thickest and least compact case in terms of the surface area it occupies.

Size Comparison

428 mm / 16.9 inch 314 mm / 12.4 inch 51 mm / 2.01 inch 4.2 kg9.26 lbs428 mm / 16.9 inch 303.3 mm / 11.9 inch 26.5 mm / 1.043 inch 4.5 kg9.92 lbs418 mm / 16.5 inch 288 mm / 11.3 inch 30 mm / 1.181 inch 3.5 kg7.7 lbs416 mm / 16.4 inch 281 mm / 11.1 inch 31 mm / 1.22 inch 3.5 kg7.62 lbs414 mm / 16.3 inch 274 mm / 10.8 inch 30 mm / 1.181 inch 3.3 kg7.38 lbs397 mm / 15.6 inch 268.5 mm / 10.6 inch 27.5 mm / 1.083 inch 2.6 kg5.73 lbs

Features - ConceptD with Thunderbolt 3

The Acer laptop offers a well-rounded port selection. There are three USB Type-A ports (2x USB 3.2 Gen 1, 1x USB 2.0) and two USB Type-C ports (1x USB 3.2 Gen 1, 1x Thunderbolt 3) available on the workstation. Both USB Type-C ports support the DisplayPort via USB-C feature (although this requires a separately available adapter). Combined with the dedicated DisplayPort and the HDMI port, this brings the workstation up to a total of four video outputs. Furthermore, two audio jacks (headphone output, microphone input), a Gigabit Ethernet port and a lock slot round off the package. Meanwhile, a card reader is nowhere to be found.

The ports are distributed across the left and right sides as well as the back. The ports on the sides are centered. As a result, cables are unlikely to get in the way when using an external mouse.

Left: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), microphone input, headphone output, USB 2.0 (Type-A)
Left: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), microphone input, headphone output, USB 2.0 (Type-A)
Right: lock slot, power button, Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-C), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), Gigabit Ethernet
Right: lock slot, power button, Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-C), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), Gigabit Ethernet
Back: DisplayPort, HDMI, AC adapter
Back: DisplayPort, HDMI, AC adapter

Communication

On-board ax Wi-Fi
On-board ax Wi-Fi

Apart from the Wi-Fi standards 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, the Killer Wi-Fi module also supports the faster ax standard. Under optimal conditions (no other Wi-Fi devices in proximity, short distance between the laptop and server), we recorded very good transfer speeds. A Killer E3000 Gigabit Ethernet controller is responsible for wired networking. There were no issues with it during our tests.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
905 (min: 752, max: 950) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Workstation
  (292 - 1557, n=58)
706 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
693 (min: 345, max: 697) MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
599 MBit/s ∼66% -34%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
580 MBit/s ∼64% -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
547 MBit/s ∼60% -40%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
840 (min: 769, max: 903) MBit/s ∼100%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
683 MBit/s ∼81% -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
670 MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
652 (min: 330, max: 712) MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Average of class Workstation
  (83 - 1642, n=58)
644 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
83 MBit/s ∼10% -90%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950Tooltip
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW); iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø905 (752-950)
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø681 (345-697)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW); iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø840 (769-903)
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø641 (330-712)

Webcam

The integrated 2.1-MP webcam can take pictures with a maximum resolution of 1920x1080 pixels. The results are decent. However, the color accuracy leaves something to be desired. Its deviation of 33.6 is significantly above the ideal range (DeltaE of less than three).

ColorChecker
15.9 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
34 ∆E
18 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
32.3 ∆E
19 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
20 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
23 ∆E
27.2 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Acer ConceptD 9 Pro: 20.27 ∆E min: 2.53 - max: 33.96 ∆E

Accessories

Aside from the usual accessories (warranty information, quick-start guide), the ConceptD also includes a Wacom digital pen.

Maintenance

There is no maintenance hatch available on the workstation. In order to reach the components, the top panel needs to be removed. This can be accomplished by loosening all the screws on the bottom of the device and subsequently putting the device back on its feet. While the top panel can be lifted at this point, it cannot yet be detached entirely, since it is still held by plastic clips above the exhaust vents on the back. The clips can be removed by carefully moving the top part back and forth. Careful: The top part of the chassis will still be connected to the motherboard through two cables at this point. They need to be disconnected before the chassis can be opened fully.

Hardware of the ConceptD 9 Pro CN917-71P-96BK
Hardware of the ConceptD 9 Pro CN917-71P-96BK

Warranty

Acer offers buyers of the ConceptD a two-year warranty - including pickup and delivery service. The warranty also includes Predator Premium Service. With this service, Acer promises to check and repair a defective device within 72 hours.

Input Devices - Wacom Digital Pen Included with the CN917-71P

Keyboard

Acer has equipped the convertible with a backlit chiclet keyboard. The "warm, amber backlighting" (quote from an Acer press release) can be controlled via two function keys. The keyboard's keys are flat, smooth, and they offer shallow travel with a distinct actuation point that can be felt and also heard quite clearly. The individual keys have a clicky feedback. As such, the keyboard is unsuitable for use in quiet environments.

The keyboard does not have a standard layout. Not every key is in its usual position. Some of the keys that usually form the top row of the numpad have been integrated into the main area of the keyboard. Furthermore, the size of the shift keys is fairly small. As a result, we often found ourselves searching for them on the keyboard. Since the keyboard is located near the front edge of the base unit, there are no palm rests. Thus, typing is never a truly comfortable experience.

Touchpad

The multitouch-enabled touchpad spans an area of around 6.2 x 9 cm (~2.44 x 3.54 in). The smooth surface does not obstruct fingers when gliding over it. The touchpad responds precisely to inputs all the way into the corners. Below the touchpad, there are two dedicated mouse buttons that offer medium travel and a distinct feedback. Lastly, a numpad can be displayed on the touchpad.

Input devices
Input devices
A numpad can be displayed on the touchpad
A numpad can be displayed on the touchpad

Touchscreen

The touchscreen supports 10 multitouch points and promptly responds to inputs. We did not encounter any issues with it during our review. The screen can be used either with a finger or the included Wacom digital pen. The digital pen weighs 13 grams and detects 4,096 pressure levels.

Included digital pen
Included digital pen
The digital pen can be mounted on the top of the display
The digital pen can be mounted on the top of the display

Display - 4K IPS on Board

The matte 17.3-inch touchscreen display has a native resolution of 3840x2160 pixels. The contrast ratio (1019:1) and brightness (367.1 cd/m²) are good. Positive: The display does not exhibit PWM flickering.

Subpixel array
Subpixel array
Backlight bleeding
Backlight bleeding
343
cd/m²
372
cd/m²
367
cd/m²
334
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
355
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B173ZAN03.1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 401 cd/m² Average: 368.1 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 381 cd/m²
Contrast: 1019:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.52 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8, calibrated: 1.08
ΔE Greyscale 3.83 | 0.64-98 Ø6
98% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 84% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI WE75 9TK
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Dell Precision 7730
IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3
Eurocom Tornado F7W
IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Fujitsu Celsius H980
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
25%
29%
10%
20%
33%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
53 (27, 26)
40 (20.4, 19.6)
25%
30.8 (14.4, 16.4)
42%
48.8 (24.4, 24.4)
8%
40 (18.8, 21.2)
25%
38 (19.2, 18.8)
28%
Response Time Black / White *
37 (21, 16)
28 (17.2, 10.8)
24%
31.2 (18.8, 12.4)
16%
32.8 (18.8, 14)
11%
31.6 (18, 13.6)
15%
23.2 (10, 13.2)
37%
PWM Frequency
25000 (50)
120500 (99)
Screen
-28%
-19%
2%
-54%
-51%
Brightness middle
377
333
-12%
287.3
-24%
322
-15%
328.2
-13%
400
6%
Brightness
368
310
-16%
280
-24%
316
-14%
310
-16%
394
7%
Brightness Distribution
83
83
0%
89
7%
84
1%
92
11%
92
11%
Black Level *
0.37
0.39
-5%
0.26
30%
0.24
35%
0.37
-0%
0.51
-38%
Contrast
1019
854
-16%
1105
8%
1342
32%
887
-13%
784
-23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.52
4.4
-75%
2.98
-18%
2.2
13%
6.62
-163%
5.3
-110%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.55
7.5
-35%
5.08
8%
4.6
17%
9.49
-71%
9.3
-68%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.08
2
-85%
3.06
-183%
1.9
-76%
3.93
-264%
3.8
-252%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.83
5.1
-33%
3
22%
1.6
58%
6.7
-75%
5.5
-44%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.39 92%
2.28 96%
2.19 100%
2.44 90%
2.17 101%
CCT
6323 103%
7061 92%
6993 93%
6621 98%
6462 101%
6686 97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
84
61.1
-27%
58.1
-31%
60.4
-28%
87.9
5%
55.8
-34%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98
94
-4%
89.5
-9%
93.3
-5%
100
2%
84.9
-13%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2% / -20%
5% / -12%
6% / 3%
-17% / -43%
-9% / -38%

* ... smaller is better

The panel can display a wide spectrum of colors ex-factory. With a DeltaE-2000 color deviation of about 2.5, it remains within the ideal range (DeltaE of less than three). The display does not suffer from a blue tint. By performing a calibration, we were able to further improve the display by a significant margin. This caused the grayscale and color DeltaE to drop to 1. Ex-factory, the grayscale DeltaE value was 3.8.

If an exact color representation is needed, calibration is thus worthwhile. Our calibrated color profile can be found in the box above. The display achieves a very good result in terms of the color-space coverage. It covers 84% (AdobeRGB) and 98% (sRGB) of the respective color spaces.

CalMAN - grayscale
CalMAN - grayscale
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - saturation sweeps
CalMAN - saturation sweeps
CalMAN - ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN - ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN - grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN - grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN - saturation sweeps (calibrated)
CalMAN - saturation sweeps (calibrated)
ConceptD vs. sRGB 98%
ConceptD vs. sRGB 98%
ConceptD vs. AdobeRGB 84%
ConceptD vs. AdobeRGB 84%

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17886 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Acer has equipped the ConceptD 9 with an IPS panel with wide viewing angles. As a result, the screen can be read from any position. Provided the sun does not shine too brightly, this is also possible outdoors.

ConceptD outdoors (taken in bright sunlight)
ConceptD outdoors (taken in bright sunlight)
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance - Acer Computer with High-End Hardware

With the ConceptD 9 Pro CN917-71P, Acer has a 17.3-inch workstation with more than enough processing power for all common use cases on offer. Our configuration of the device can be purchased starting from about 5,500 Euros (~$6,073). Other configurations are available as well.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
YouTube
 

Processor

The ConceptD is powered by an eight-core Core i9-9980HK (Coffee Lake) processor. The CPU has a base clock of 2.4 GHz. Via Turbo Boost, the clock speed can be increased to 4.2 GHz (eight cores), 4.5 GHz (six cores), 4.7 GHz (four cores), 4.9 GHz (two cores) or 5 GHz (single core). Additionally, Hyper-Threading (two threads per core) is supported. Thanks to the unlocked multiplier, overclocking the processor is a very simple task.

During Cinebench R15's multithread test, the processor temporarily runs at 4.1 to 4.2 GHz. Subsequently, the clock rate drops to 2.8 to 2.9 GHz. During the single-thread test, the clock speed ranges from 4.1 to 5 GHz. In battery mode, we can observe clock speed of 2.4 GHz (multithread) and 2.1 to 2.8 GHz (single-thread).

Multithread (mains)
Multithread (mains)
Single-thread (mains)
Single-thread (mains)
Multithread (battery mode)
Multithread (battery mode)
Single-thread (battery mode)
Single-thread (battery mode)

By running Cinebench R15's multithread test in a loop for at least 30 minutes, we determine whether the CPU Turbo Boost is permanently active while the laptop is connected to an outlet. The scores drop significantly by the second loop, and they stabilize on a fairly consistent level afterwards. During this, the Turbo Boost increases the clock speeds slightly.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320133013401350136013701380139014001410142014301440145014601470148014901500151015201530154015501560157015801590160016101620163016401650Tooltip
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1254 (1233.43-1584.74)
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Intel Core i7-9850H, Intel Core i7-9850H: Ø1159 (1130-1229)
MSI WE75 9TK Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1149 (1132.57-1211.28)
Dell Precision 7730 Intel Core i7-8850H, Intel Core i7-8850H: Ø1158 (1144.66-1276.49)
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K, Intel Core i9-9900K: Ø1615 (1590.08-1643.59)
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1034 (1025.75-1058.79)
CPU frequency during the CB15 loop
CPU frequency during the CB15 loop
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7709
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
39440
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
19419
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
201 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1585 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
247.5 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
214 Points ∼100% +6%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
201 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
  (181 - 215, n=13)
199 Points ∼93% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
192 Points ∼90% -4%
MSI WE75 9TK
Intel Core i7-9750H
191 Points ∼89% -5%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H
182 Points ∼85% -9%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼82% -13%
Average of class Workstation
  (117 - 214, n=107)
162 Points ∼76% -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
  (1327 - 1930, n=14)
1656 Points ∼100% +4%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
1623 Points ∼98% +2%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1585 Points ∼96%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H
1276.49 (min: 1144.66, max: 1276.49) Points ∼77% -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
1272 (min: 1143, max: 1229) Points ∼77% -20%
MSI WE75 9TK
Intel Core i7-9750H
1211 Points ∼73% -24%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
Intel Core i7-8750H
1090 Points ∼66% -31%
Average of class Workstation
  (260 - 1623, n=111)
810 Points ∼49% -49%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
  (39440 - 50439, n=4)
44697 Points ∼100% +13%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
39440 Points ∼88%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
36683 Points ∼82% -7%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
Intel Core i7-8750H
35116 Points ∼79% -11%
Average of class Workstation
  (8373 - 50439, n=96)
20750 Points ∼46% -47%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
  (7709 - 9734, n=4)
8346 Points ∼100% +8%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
8042 Points ∼96% +4%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
7709 Points ∼92%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
Intel Core i7-8750H
6561 Points ∼79% -15%
Average of class Workstation
  (3094 - 9734, n=95)
5536 Points ∼66% -28%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
505 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
  (445 - 505, n=9)
476 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI WE75 9TK
Intel Core i7-9750H
465 Points ∼92% -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
454 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Workstation
  (374 - 505, n=15)
447 Points ∼89% -11%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H
443 Points ∼88% -12%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
  (2974 - 4150, n=9)
3523 Points ∼100% +18%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
2974 Points ∼84%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H
2724 Points ∼77% -8%
MSI WE75 9TK
Intel Core i7-9750H
2672 Points ∼76% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
2428 Points ∼69% -18%
Average of class Workstation
  (988 - 3429, n=16)
2397 Points ∼68% -19%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
31724 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
 
31724 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (5939 - 31724, n=15)
14342 Points ∼45% -55%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
4871 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
 
4871 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (2964 - 4871, n=15)
3785 Points ∼78% -22%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
30849 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
  (28625 - 30849, n=3)
29620 Points ∼96% -4%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
26616 Points ∼86% -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
24218 Points ∼79% -21%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H
22915 Points ∼74% -26%
Average of class Workstation
  (8278 - 30849, n=23)
20322 Points ∼66% -34%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K
6068 Points ∼100% +2%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
5972 Points ∼98%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
  (5617 - 5972, n=3)
5853 Points ∼96% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
5614 Points ∼93% -6%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H
5369 Points ∼88% -10%
Average of class Workstation
  (4077 - 6068, n=23)
5239 Points ∼86% -12%
Geekbench 5
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
7805 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
  (7072 - 7805, n=4)
7421 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
5353 Points ∼69% -31%
Average of class Workstation
  (3159 - 7805, n=11)
5022 Points ∼64% -36%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1321 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
  (1171 - 1355, n=4)
1273 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Workstation
  (1135 - 1321, n=11)
1212 Points ∼92% -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
1135 Points ∼86% -14%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Fujitsu Celsius H980
Intel Core i7-8750H (EDGE: 42.17134.1.0)
1113.7 ms * ∼100% -17%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H (Edge)
1093 ms * ∼98% -15%
MSI WE75 9TK
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44.17763.831.0)
1054.9 ms * ∼95% -11%
MSI WE75 9TK
Intel Core i7-9750H
0 ms * ∼0% +100%
Average of class Workstation
  (751 - 2263, n=57)
1050 ms * ∼94% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H (Edge)
1009.5 ms * ∼91% -6%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK (Edge 44)
951.2 ms * ∼85%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
  (705 - 999, n=9)
878 ms * ∼79% +8%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
  (40364 - 46473, n=8)
42641 Points ∼100% +2%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK (Edge 44)
41975 Points ∼98%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H (Edge)
39548 Points ∼93% -6%
MSI WE75 9TK
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44.17763.831.0)
37572 Points ∼88% -10%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H (Edge)
35962 Points ∼84% -14%
Average of class Workstation
  (14774 - 44780, n=51)
35398 Points ∼83% -16%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
Intel Core i7-8750H (EDGE: 42.17134.1.0)
34043 Points ∼80% -19%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Intel Core i9-9900K (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
315.56 Points ∼100% +8%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK (Edge 44)
293.46 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK
  (257 - 318, n=8)
293 Points ∼93% 0%
MSI WE75 9TK
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44.17763.831.0)
269.74 Points ∼85% -8%
Average of class Workstation
  (176 - 316, n=50)
255 Points ∼81% -13%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
Intel Core i7-8750H (EDGE: 42.17134.1.0)
245.86 Points ∼78% -16%

* ... smaller is better

System Performance

The 17.3-inch laptop does not lack system performance. A powerful eight-core processor, dual-channel mode RAM and a fast NVMe SSD make for a smooth and responsive system. On top of that, the workstation is equipped with a high-end GPU. The PCMark benchmark results are excellent, which again emphasizes the fact that the laptop is fast enough for all common use cases.

PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4487 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6412 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4884 points
Help
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00
10441 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
 
10441 Points ∼100% 0%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
8122 Points ∼78% -22%
MSI WE75 9TK
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7156 Points ∼69% -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
6876 Points ∼66% -34%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6622 Points ∼63% -37%
Dell Precision 7730
Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6353 Points ∼61% -39%
Average of class Workstation
  (2329 - 10441, n=49)
5248 Points ∼50% -50%
Productivity
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00
8761 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
 
8761 Points ∼100% 0%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
8307 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI WE75 9TK
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7693 Points ∼88% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
7641 Points ∼87% -13%
Dell Precision 7730
Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7278 Points ∼83% -17%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7203 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Workstation
  (3998 - 8761, n=49)
7141 Points ∼82% -18%
Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
9917 Points ∼100% 0%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00
9915 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
 
9915 Points ∼100% 0%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
9847 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI WE75 9TK
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9694 Points ∼98% -2%
Dell Precision 7730
Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9251 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Workstation
  (5223 - 9917, n=49)
8652 Points ∼87% -13%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8032 Points ∼81% -19%
Score
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00
6939 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
 
6939 Points ∼100% 0%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
6255 Points ∼90% -10%
MSI WE75 9TK
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5815 Points ∼84% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
5768 Points ∼83% -17%
Dell Precision 7730
Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5401 Points ∼78% -22%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5206 Points ∼75% -25%
Average of class Workstation
  (2817 - 6939, n=50)
4877 Points ∼70% -30%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI WE75 9TK
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5570 Points ∼100% +14%
Dell Precision 7730
Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5450 Points ∼98% +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
5432 Points ∼98% +11%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5132 Points ∼92% +5%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00
4884 Points ∼88%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
 
4884 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (3311 - 5655, n=86)
4834 Points ∼87% -1%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Tornado F7W
Quadro P5200, i9-9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
5130 Points ∼100% +14%
Dell Precision 7730
Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4657 Points ∼91% +4%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00
4487 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
 
4487 Points ∼87% 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
Quadro P3200, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4376 Points ∼85% -2%
MSI WE75 9TK
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4301 Points ∼84% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
4271 Points ∼83% -5%
Average of class Workstation
  (2320 - 5505, n=87)
3979 Points ∼78% -11%

Storage Solution

An NVMe SSD from Western Digital serves as the system drive. In this case, it is a model in the M.2 2280 form factor with 1 TB of storage space. Ex-factory, about 887 GB is available to users. The remaining space is occupied by the recovery partition and the windows system. The transfer rates are good. On the inside of the workstation, there is an additional M.2 2280 slot available. If two drives are installed, they can operate in RAID 0.

The SSD is covered by a copper cooler
The SSD is covered by a copper cooler
There is space for a secondary NVMe SSD
There is space for a secondary NVMe SSD
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00
Sequential Read: 1781 MB/s
Sequential Write: 2122 MB/s
512K Read: 1086 MB/s
512K Write: 1757 MB/s
4K Read: 11.1 MB/s
4K Write: 115.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 478.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 407.4 MB/s
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
MSI WE75 9TK
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Dell Precision 7730
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Eurocom Tornado F7W
3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
Fujitsu Celsius H980
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Average WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-6%
-3%
-24%
2%
-30%
-10%
Write 4K
176
154.3
-12%
135.4
-23%
103.2
-41%
116.3
-34%
111.8
-36%
134 (92.3 - 176, n=2)
-24%
Read 4K
48.06
66.36
38%
56.64
18%
41.39
-14%
52.65
10%
32.02
-33%
44.1 (40.1 - 48.1, n=2)
-8%
Write Seq
2736
1561
-43%
1972
-28%
1880
-31%
2539
-7%
1539
-44%
2601 (2466 - 2736, n=2)
-5%
Read Seq
2381
2460
3%
2101
-12%
2350
-1%
2972
25%
1252
-47%
2182 (1983 - 2381, n=2)
-8%
Write 4K Q32T1
418.6
438
5%
527.4
26%
282.3
-33%
454.6
9%
355.4
-15%
334 (250 - 419, n=2)
-20%
Read 4K Q32T1
460.8
567.8
23%
578
25%
314.3
-32%
515.1
12%
408.7
-11%
418 (376 - 461, n=2)
-9%
Write Seq Q32T1
2791
1581
-43%
1985
-29%
1881
-33%
3101
11%
1912.6
-31%
2791 (2791 - 2791, n=2)
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
3430
2724
-21%
3358
-2%
3216
-6%
3078
-10%
2529.9
-26%
3342 (3253 - 3430, n=2)
-3%

GPU Performance

The Acer laptop is equipped with a Quadro RTX 5000 GPU. This GPU is based on Nvidia's Turing architecture and represents the professional version of the GeForce RTX 2080 GPU. However, the RTX 5000 has more shader units (3,072 instead of 2,944). It also has access to fast GDDR6 memory (16.384 GB).

There are two variants of the mobile RTX 5000 GPU, which differ in terms of their TGP (150 watts vs. 110 watts) and thus their performance. The stronger variant is installed in the ConceptD. Additionally, Nvidia also has three Max-Q versions of the RTX 5000 on offer.

The RTX 5000 runs at a base clock speed of 1350 MHz. Via boost, this can be increased to 1770 MHz. Provided the GPU does not cross a certain predefined temperature and/or energy consumption threshold, even higher frequencies are possible. We recorded a peak core clock of 1927 MHz. In our The Witcher 3 test, the GPU runs at an average clock speed of 1643 MHz.

The 3DMark results match our expectations. The integrated UHD Graphics 630 GPU is disabled and the laptop does not use Nvidia's graphics-switching technology Optimus.

3DMark 11 (mains)
3DMark 11 (mains)
3DMark 11 (battery mode)
3DMark 11 (battery mode)
3DMark 06 Standard
45180 points
3DMark 11 Performance
26416 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
184872 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
44296 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
20374 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
9779 points
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
32999 Points ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (24156 - 32999, n=4)
26537 Points ∼80% -20%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
26465 Points ∼80% -20%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
24934 Points ∼76% -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
24156 Points ∼73% -27%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
20542 Points ∼62% -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
17569 Points ∼53% -47%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
16805 Points ∼51% -49%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
16433 Points ∼50% -50%
Average of class Workstation
  (841 - 32999, n=120)
7558 Points ∼23% -77%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
9956 Points ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (6999 - 9956, n=2)
8478 Points ∼85% -15%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
7153 Points ∼72% -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
6999 Points ∼70% -30%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
6390 Points ∼64% -36%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
6014 Points ∼60% -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
5503 Points ∼55% -45%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
4356 Points ∼44% -56%
Average of class Workstation
  (566 - 9956, n=40)
3738 Points ∼38% -62%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
24354 Points ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (18247 - 24354, n=2)
21301 Points ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
19821 Points ∼81% -19%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
18390 Points ∼76% -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
18247 Points ∼75% -25%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
15881 Points ∼65% -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
13802 Points ∼57% -43%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
12558 Points ∼52% -48%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
12554 Points ∼52% -48%
Average of class Workstation
  (752 - 24354, n=112)
6141 Points ∼25% -75%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
133756 Points ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (116912 - 133756, n=2)
125334 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
116912 Points ∼87% -13%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
106470 Points ∼80% -20%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
105184 Points ∼79% -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
91394 Points ∼68% -32%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
82713 Points ∼62% -38%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
82300 Points ∼62% -38%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
64768 Points ∼48% -52%
Average of class Workstation
  (5836 - 133756, n=111)
36316 Points ∼27% -73%
SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
230.1 fps ∼100%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
212 fps ∼92% -8%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (113 - 230, n=4)
146 fps ∼63% -37%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
144.9 fps ∼63% -37%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
120.22 fps ∼52% -48%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
112.52 fps ∼49% -51%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
107.11 fps ∼47% -53%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
106.8 fps ∼46% -54%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
102.01 fps ∼44% -56%
Average of class Workstation
  (15.6 - 230, n=94)
81 fps ∼35% -65%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
258.1 fps ∼100%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
217.93 fps ∼84% -16%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (127 - 258, n=4)
170 fps ∼66% -34%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
149.2 fps ∼58% -42%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
134.52 fps ∼52% -48%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
127.2 fps ∼49% -51%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
124.3 fps ∼48% -52%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
108.36 fps ∼42% -58%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
99.63 fps ∼39% -61%
Average of class Workstation
  (4.87 - 258, n=94)
66.1 fps ∼26% -74%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
126.4 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (92.6 - 126, n=4)
101 fps ∼80% -20%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
94.9 fps ∼75% -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
92.56 fps ∼73% -27%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
82.14 fps ∼65% -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
76.87 fps ∼61% -39%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
74.96 fps ∼59% -41%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
59.05 fps ∼47% -53%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
58.71 fps ∼46% -54%
Average of class Workstation
  (3.93 - 126, n=92)
36 fps ∼28% -72%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
109.3 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (58.4 - 109, n=2)
83.9 fps ∼77% -23%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
79.43 fps ∼73% -27%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
62.1 fps ∼57% -43%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
58.41 fps ∼53% -47%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
49 fps ∼45% -55%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
48.7 fps ∼45% -55%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
43.68 fps ∼40% -60%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
43.01 fps ∼39% -61%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.99 - 109, n=94)
25.4 fps ∼23% -77%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
179 fps ∼100%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
147.92 fps ∼83% -17%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (74.8 - 179, n=4)
110 fps ∼61% -39%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
92.91 fps ∼52% -48%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
90.3 fps ∼50% -50%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
86.8 fps ∼48% -52%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
74.82 fps ∼42% -58%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
72.36 fps ∼40% -60%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
64.91 fps ∼36% -64%
Average of class Workstation
  (5.4 - 179, n=95)
49.1 fps ∼27% -73%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
26 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (13.3 - 26, n=2)
19.7 fps ∼76% -24%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
16.88 fps ∼65% -35%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
14.23 fps ∼55% -45%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
13.3 fps ∼51% -49%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
12.13 fps ∼47% -53%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
11.54 fps ∼44% -56%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
10.72 fps ∼41% -59%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
10.25 fps ∼39% -61%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.06 - 26, n=95)
5.3 fps ∼20% -80%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
172.1 fps ∼100%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
159.99 fps ∼93% -7%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (127 - 172, n=4)
140 fps ∼81% -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
127.67 fps ∼74% -26%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
120.12 fps ∼70% -30%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
118.5 fps ∼69% -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
113.62 fps ∼66% -34%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
109.47 fps ∼64% -36%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
105.73 fps ∼61% -39%
Average of class Workstation
  (14 - 172, n=95)
61.1 fps ∼36% -64%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
220 fps ∼100%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
196.6 fps ∼89% -11%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (118 - 220, n=4)
149 fps ∼68% -32%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
129.98 fps ∼59% -41%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
125.36 fps ∼57% -43%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
123.01 fps ∼56% -44%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
118.42 fps ∼54% -46%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
108.79 fps ∼49% -51%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
105.1 fps ∼48% -52%
Average of class Workstation
  (13.4 - 220, n=95)
67.2 fps ∼31% -69%
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
235.8 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (172 - 236, n=3)
194 fps ∼82% -18%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
177.56 fps ∼75% -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
150.97 fps ∼64% -36%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
110.31 fps ∼47% -53%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
109.97 fps ∼47% -53%
Average of class Workstation
  (11.4 - 236, n=26)
81.9 fps ∼35% -65%
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
203.8 fps ∼100%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
189.22 fps ∼93% -7%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (122 - 204, n=4)
147 fps ∼72% -28%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
131.52 fps ∼65% -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
129.58 fps ∼64% -36%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
122.09 fps ∼60% -40%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
120.9 fps ∼59% -41%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
110.59 fps ∼54% -46%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
109.62 fps ∼54% -46%
Average of class Workstation
  (37.3 - 204, n=30)
105 fps ∼52% -48%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
465.3 fps ∼100%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
396.3 fps ∼85% -15%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (268 - 465, n=4)
322 fps ∼69% -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
286.67 fps ∼62% -38%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
280.2 fps ∼60% -40%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
243.53 fps ∼52% -48%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
225.36 fps ∼48% -52%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
204.35 fps ∼44% -56%
Average of class Workstation
  (36.4 - 465, n=30)
186 fps ∼40% -60%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
160.56 fps ∼35% -65%
Showcase (showcase-02)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
127.1 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (92.4 - 127, n=4)
102 fps ∼80% -20%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
94.6 fps ∼74% -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
93.44 fps ∼74% -26%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
80.91 fps ∼64% -36%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
74.67 fps ∼59% -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
73.33 fps ∼58% -42%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
58.85 fps ∼46% -54%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
58.63 fps ∼46% -54%
Average of class Workstation
  (12.6 - 127, n=30)
53.6 fps ∼42% -58%
Medical (medical-02)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
133.4 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (79 - 133, n=2)
106 fps ∼79% -21%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
79.3 fps ∼59% -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
79.03 fps ∼59% -41%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
65.56 fps ∼49% -51%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
61.7 fps ∼46% -54%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
53.87 fps ∼40% -60%
Average of class Workstation
  (6.8 - 133, n=30)
43 fps ∼32% -68%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
37.93 fps ∼28% -72%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
30.91 fps ∼23% -77%
Maya (maya-05)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
340.8 fps ∼100%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
255.04 fps ∼75% -25%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (205 - 341, n=4)
240 fps ∼70% -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
204.8 fps ∼60% -40%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
203.6 fps ∼60% -40%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
194.67 fps ∼57% -43%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
168.57 fps ∼49% -51%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
155.35 fps ∼46% -54%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
148.22 fps ∼43% -57%
Average of class Workstation
  (29.4 - 341, n=30)
136 fps ∼40% -60%
Energy (energy-02)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
57.3 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (36.2 - 57.3, n=2)
46.7 fps ∼82% -18%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
36.5 fps ∼64% -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
36.15 fps ∼63% -37%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
30.55 fps ∼53% -47%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
25.76 fps ∼45% -55%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
25.15 fps ∼44% -56%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
17.28 fps ∼30% -70%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.72 - 57.3, n=30)
16.9 fps ∼29% -71%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
8.5 fps ∼15% -85%
Creo (creo-02)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
319.8 fps ∼100%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
247.66 fps ∼77% -23%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (210 - 320, n=4)
238 fps ∼74% -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
212.28 fps ∼66% -34%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
211.4 fps ∼66% -34%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
196.19 fps ∼61% -39%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
160.6 fps ∼50% -50%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
158.84 fps ∼50% -50%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
154.8 fps ∼48% -52%
Average of class Workstation
  (27.8 - 320, n=30)
136 fps ∼43% -57%
Catia (catia-05)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
338.9 fps ∼100%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
302.43 fps ∼89% -11%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (215 - 339, n=4)
247 fps ∼73% -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
215.72 fps ∼64% -36%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
207.8 fps ∼61% -39%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
205.21 fps ∼61% -39%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
190.79 fps ∼56% -44%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
185.84 fps ∼55% -45%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
180.76 fps ∼53% -47%
Average of class Workstation
  (27.7 - 339, n=30)
152 fps ∼45% -55%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
232.2 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (173 - 232, n=4)
188 fps ∼81% -19%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
174.2 fps ∼75% -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
172.74 fps ∼74% -26%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
162.5 fps ∼70% -30%
Eurocom Tornado F7W
NVIDIA Quadro P5200, Intel Core i9-9900K
149.6 fps ∼64% -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
149.42 fps ∼64% -36%
Dell Precision 7730
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H
108.02 fps ∼47% -53%
Fujitsu Celsius H980
NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H
107.52 fps ∼46% -54%
Average of class Workstation
  (20 - 232, n=30)
104 fps ∼45% -55%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
107.6 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (60.1 - 108, n=2)
83.9 fps ∼78% -22%
Average of class Workstation
  (28.3 - 135, n=6)
68.5 fps ∼64% -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
60.1 fps ∼56% -44%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
242.3 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
  (139 - 242, n=2)
191 fps ∼79% -21%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
167.2 fps ∼69% -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN000YGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
138.7 fps ∼57% -43%
Average of class Workstation
  (29.6 - 242, n=7)
119 fps ∼49% -51%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen