For Honor Notebook and Desktop Benchmarks

Trinity. After Rainbow Six Siege and The Division, Ubisoft releases their next Triple-A title, which focuses primarily on riveting multiplayer battlers. Knights, Samurai and Vikings - For Honor actually pits three different factions against each other. Our review focuses primarily on how different GPUs handle the various swinging swords, katanas and axes.

Florian Glaser, Klaus Hinum, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Bernie Pechlaner), Published 02/23/2017 🇩🇪

For the original German article, see here.

Graphics

Not surprisingly, Ubisoft once again relies on their own AnvilNext Engine, which the company uses for various other titles its lineup in either a beefed-up or pared-down version (Assassin‘s Creed-series, Rainbow Six Siege, Steep, Ghost Recon Wildlands, ...). From a technical standpoint, For Honor leaves us with a good to very good impression. The textures are largely sharp and the intricate details as well as the good-looking effects are other positive attributes. The gaming universe, which is based on medieval times, contains plenty of atmosphere.

One of the game's most differentiating attributes is the combat system, which seems to follow the principle "easy to learn, but difficult to master". Thanks to the multitude of maneuvers and varied as well as nicely choreographed animations and finishing moves, For Honor doesn't feel stale and routine nearly as quickly as the hack-and-slash competitor Ryse from Crytek (which features quite similar gameplay). The standard opponents in single player mode, however, do get boring after a while and might invite the user to just keep on clicking. Speaking of single player mode: For Honor requires a constant online connection, even though this shouldn't be necessary unless the game is running in multi player or in co-op mode.

The developers did a good job with the options menu. In order to avoid crowding, the options are separated into two separate menus. The Display tab allows for monitor adjustments like mode, resolution, frequency, vertical synchronization, field of view, and contrast.

The Graphics tab allows the user to change ten options - texture filter, anti-aliasing (FXAA, SMAA, TAA), ambient occlusion and motion blur, among others - which are explained at length in some cases. We recommend to leave "render scaling" at 100 % if at all possible, since the picture tends to be fuzzy otherwise.

Users who don't want to spend a lot of time fine-tuning the game can just simply use one of the four quality presets. We used the highest preset called "Extreme" for our screenshots as well as the benchmark video. Except for the extremely demanding SSAA, all other settings are set to their respective maximum here, which results in an outstanding visual experience. The comparison photos below show that shadows don't quite look as clean on "High".

The preset "Medium" is almost indistinguishable from "High", which translate into a marginal gain in performance. The "Low" setting - and hence minimum details - results in a significant loss in texture quality and also in atmosphere, since both ambient occlusion and anti-aliasing are turned off and the shadows are weak to boot. We'd never call For Honor ugly, though - particularly in light of the frame rates, which increase significantly at the lowest settings.

An indicator within the options menu shows how much VRAM is going to be needed. Compared to other games released in 2016 and 2017 (examples: Resident Evil 7, Call of Duty Infinite Warfare, Deus Ex Mankind Divided, ...), For Honor doesn't require too much video RAM. With the preset "Extreme" active, the game uses 2 GB for Full-HD and 4 GB for 4K resolution.

Most of the settings can be adjusted while a game is running, but some require switching back to the main menu. A restart of the game is seemingly never necessary - a good thing, considering the long initial load time and the fact that the intro videos can't be skipped. Within the game, the load times are acceptable (we tested with both HDDs and SSDs).

We didn't run into any technical issues during benchmarking and when playing, although For Honor didn't run properly in fullscreen mode when using Nvidia's Optimus technology and refused to run with the integrated GPU altogether. This is particularly surprising because the title is part of Nvidia's gaming program "The way it‘s meant to be played" and we had the newest driver (ForceWare 378.66) installed as well.

Otherwise, we didn't encounter any anomalies like graphic errors or crashes. At the time of writing, For Honor requires about 36 GB of disk space. The download itself is 32 GB - a so-so result, considering modern games usually require between 10 and 70 GB.

Benchmark

Just like Ubisoft's Rainbow Six Siege and The Division, For Honor comes with an integrated benchmark test, which can be accessed using the graphics menu. The sequence consists of a 70 second camera sweep through and above a battlefield. Because of the numerous effects (fire, smoke, explosions, physics etc.) and rapid camera movement, this benchmark is almost a "worst case scenario". During the first few single player missions, our primary test rig (MSI GT62VR 6RD with Core i7-6820HK & GeForce GTX 1060) averaged a frame rate plus of 10 % compared to the benchmark sequence.

We appreciate the analysis at the end of the test, which shows the minimum, average and maximum fps (and even a breakdown into different zones). Values below 45 appear in orange and those below 30 in red. For multiplayer gaming we recommend at least 40 fps, even though the third-person perspective isn't quite as sensitive to frame rates. For single player mode, a lower frame rate might be acceptable as well.

▶ load Youtube video

Results

To play For Honor at a resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels, a current top-of-the-line GPU is needed. A GeForce GTX 1070 is required to push the preset "High" beyond 40 fps. The notebook standard resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels has much lower demands. The setting "Extreme" runs without stutters with a GeForce GTX 970M or better; the preset "High" requires a GeForce GTX 965M and "Medium" at least a GeForce GTX 960M.

Benchmark tests with less powerful Nvidia, Intel and AMD GPUs are going to follow in the next days/weeks. Entry-level and inexpensive or older midrange GPUs are likely only going to work at a resolution of 1366 x 768 pixels and at low to medium settings.

For Honor
3840x2160 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x 3840x2160 High Preset AA:T AF:8x 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:4x 1366x768 Medium Preset AA:T AF:4x 1280x720 Low Preset
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 6700K Desktop PC	60.5 (36^min) fps ∼45% 139 (75^min) fps ∼49% 189 (148^min) fps ∼54% 198 (157^min) fps ∼55% 271 (172^min) fps ∼58% 305 (194^min) fps ∼60%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition	54.9 (42^min) fps ∼41% 138 (77^min) fps ∼48%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 6700K Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070	49.5 (31^min) fps ∼37% 115 (74^min) fps ∼40% 157 (117^min) fps ∼45% 166 (129^min) fps ∼46% 253 (160^min) fps ∼54% 302 (170^min) fps ∼59%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition	43.9 (36^min) fps ∼33% 111 (50^min) fps ∼39%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK Asus G752VS	43.4 (34^min) fps ∼32% 108 (78^min) fps ∼38% 146 (119^min) fps ∼42% 154 (122^min) fps ∼43% 218 (142^min) fps ∼47% 242 (160^min) fps ∼47%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 4790K Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC	33.2 (24^min) fps ∼32% 47.7 (37^min) fps ∼35% 108 (81^min) fps ∼38% 148 (119^min) fps ∼42% 158 (125^min) fps ∼44% 241 (187^min) fps ∼52% 293 (166^min) fps ∼57%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980, 6700K Desktop PC	35.3 (28^min) fps ∼26% 83.1 (61^min) fps ∼29% 115 (93^min) fps ∼33% 121 (98^min) fps ∼34% 198 (140^min) fps ∼42% 279 (188^min) fps ∼55%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K Desktop PC	33.4 (26^min) fps ∼25% 78.7 (47^min) fps ∼28% 108 (88^min) fps ∼31% 116 (91^min) fps ∼32% 190 (142^min) fps ∼41% 275 (194^min) fps ∼54%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6820HK MSI GT62VR	30 (23^min) fps ∼22% 72.4 (41^min) fps ∼25% 99.8 (61^min) fps ∼29% 105 (67^min) fps ∼29% 173 (113^min) fps ∼37% 212 (145^min) fps ∼41%
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop), 4790K AMD Radeon RX 480 8 GB Reference	22.3 (17^min) fps ∼22% 31.6 (25^min) fps ∼23% 77 (58^min) fps ∼27% 107 (86^min) fps ∼31% 112 (91^min) fps ∼31% 268 (197^min) fps ∼52%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970, 4790K MSI Gaming Z GeForce GTX 970 Desktop PC	21.8 (15^min) fps ∼21% 31.8 (25^min) fps ∼24%
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop), 4790K MSI RX 470 Gaming X 4GB	20.6 (16^min) fps ∼20% 29.6 (24^min) fps ∼22% 69.8 (53^min) fps ∼24% 97 (80^min) fps ∼28% 102 (79^min) fps ∼28% 244 (175^min) fps ∼48%
AMD Radeon R9 290X, 4790K Sapphire Radeon R9 290X Tri-X OC	33.6 (28^min) fps ∼25% 76.5 (60^min) fps ∼27%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 4700MQ Schenker W504	23.8 (19^min) fps ∼18% 58.8 (37^min) fps ∼21% 80.1 (56^min) fps ∼23% 85.4 (58^min) fps ∼24% 159 (104^min) fps ∼34% 202 (124^min) fps ∼40%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop), 4790K MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	19.7 (15^min) fps ∼15% 48.9 (35^min) fps ∼17% 68 (54^min) fps ∼19% 71.4 (58^min) fps ∼20% 198 (152^min) fps ∼39%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 4700MQ Schenker W504	18.5 (14^min) fps ∼14% 45.8 (34^min) fps ∼16% 63.4 (36^min) fps ∼18% 67 (45^min) fps ∼19% 126 (88^min) fps ∼27% 179 (120^min) fps ∼35%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ MSI GE72 7RE-046	45.8 (33^min) fps ∼16% 62.9 (51^min) fps ∼18% 66.2 (53^min) fps ∼18%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop), 4790K Zotac GeForce GTX 1050 2GB	13.5 (10^min) fps ∼10% 42.8 (31^min) fps ∼15% 53.2 (42^min) fps ∼15% 64.5 (52^min) fps ∼18%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ MSI GL62 7RD	39 (27^min) fps ∼14% 53.6 (43^min) fps ∼15% 57.5 (45^min) fps ∼16%
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 4790K XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB	35 (26^min) fps ∼12% 50.6 (41^min) fps ∼14% 52.8 (42^min) fps ∼15% 142 (111^min) fps ∼28%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ MSI GE72 965M Ti	36.8 (26^min) fps ∼13% 49.9 (39^min) fps ∼14% 52.6 (42^min) fps ∼15%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ Schenker XMG A505	10.8 (9^min) fps ∼8% 27.1 (20^min) fps ∼9% 38.6 (30^min) fps ∼11% 41.1 (33^min) fps ∼11% 78.5 (60^min) fps ∼17% 111 (86^min) fps ∼22%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ MSI PE60 2QD	22.7 (16^min) fps ∼8% 33.2 (26^min) fps ∼10% 35.3 (28^min) fps ∼10% 94 (56^min) fps ∼18%
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 6700HQ MSI CX72 6QD	10.5 (8^min) fps ∼4% 13.9 (11^min) fps ∼4% 14.4 (12^min) fps ∼4% 44.4 (32^min) fps ∼9%
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, 5700HQ MSI GP62 2QD	13.8 (11^min) fps ∼4% 14.3 (12^min) fps ∼4% 25.8 (21^min) fps ∼6% 43.9 (35^min) fps ∼9%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P Asus N551ZU-CN007H	21.5 (13^min) fps ∼8% 25.9 (17^min) fps ∼7% 28.6 (18^min) fps ∼8% 45.8 (33^min) fps ∼10% 67 (45^min) fps ∼13%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M, 2970M MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD	34.4 (26^min) fps ∼7%

Overview

Test Systems

Desktop PCs	Platform I	Platform II
Mainboard	Asus Z170-A	Asus Z97-Deluxe
Processor	Intel Core i7-6700K (Skylake)	Intel Core i7-4790K (Haswell)
GPU	MSI GeForce GTX 1080 (8 GB GDDR5X) MSI GeForce GTX 1070 (8 GB GDDR5) Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB GDDR5) Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 (4 GB GDDR5)	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 (8 GB GDDR5X) Asus GeForce GTX 980 Ti (6 GB GDDR5) XFX Radeon R9 Fury (4 GB HBM) Sapphire Radeon R9 290X (4 GB GDDR5) Sapphire Radeon R9 280X (3 GB GDDR5) MSI Radeon R7 370 (2 GB GDDR5)
RAM	2x 8 GB DDR4-2133	2x 4 GB DDR3-1600
Storage	Crucial MX100 SSD (256 GB) Crucial M500 SSD (480 GB) OCZ Trion 100 SSD (480 GB) OCZ Trion 150 SSD (960 GB)	Intel SSD 530 (240 GB) OCZ Trion 100 SSD (480 GB)
OS	Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit	Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Schenker Notebooks	Schenker W504	Schenker XMG A505	Schenker S413
Mainboard	Intel HM87	Intel HM87	Intel HM87
Processor	Intel Core i7-4700MQ (Haswell)	Intel Core i7-4720HQ (Haswell)	Intel Core i7-4750HQ (Haswell)
GPU	Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M (8 GB GDDR5) GTX 970M (6 GB GDDR5) GTX 880M (8 GB GDDR5) GTX 870M (6 GB GDDR5) GTX 860M Kepler (4 GB GDDR5)	Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
RAM	2x 4 GB DDR3-1600	2x 4 GB DDR3-1600	2x 8 GB DDR3-1600
Storage	Samsung SSD 840 EVO (250 GB)	Micron M600 SSD (128 GB) HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HDD (1000 GB)	Intel SSD
OS	Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit	Windows 10 Home 64 Bit	Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

MSI Notebooks	MSI GT62VR	MSI GE72	MSI PE60	MSI GP62	MSI CX61	MSI CX61	MSI GE 72 7RE-046	MSI GL62 7RD
Prozessor	Intel Core i7-6820HK (Skylake)	Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Skylake)	Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Skylake)	Intel Core i7-5700HQ (Broadwell)	Intel Celeron 2970M (Haswell)	Intel Core i5-4200M (Haswell)	Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Kaby Lake)	Intel Core i7-7700HQ (Kaby Lake)
Grafikkarte	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB GDDR5)	Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M 2016 (2 GB GDDR5)	Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M (2 GB GDDR5)	Nvidia GeForce 940M (2 GB DDR3)	Nvidia GeForce 920M (2 GB DDR3)	Nvidia GeForce GT 720M (2 GB DDR3)	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Arbeitsspeicher	4 x 8 GB DDR4-2133	1 x 8 GB DDR4-2133	2 x 4 GB DDR4-2133	1 x 8 GB DDR3-1600	1 x 8 GB DDR3-1600	1 x 8 GB DDR3-1600	2 x 4 GB DDR4	2 x 4 GB DDR4
Massenspeicher	Samsung NVMe MZVPV128 SSD (128 GB)	Toshiba THNSNJ128G8NU SSD (128 GB) WDC WD10JPVX HDD (1.000 GB) OCZ Trion 100 SSD (480 GB)			Toshiba MQ01ABF050 HDD (500 GB)	WDC Scorpio Blue HDD (1.000 GB)	Samsung SSD, Toshiba Trion 150 SSD	Samsung SSD, Toshiba Trion 150 SSD
Betriebssystem	Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit	Windows 10 Home 64 Bit	Windows 10	Windows 10	Windows 10	Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit	Windows 10 64 Bit	Windows 10 64 Bit

Asus Notebooks	Asus G752VS	Asus N551ZU
Mainboard	Intel CM236	AMD K15.1
Processor	Intel Core i7-6820HK (Skylake)	AMD FX-7600P (Kaveri)
GPU	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 (8 GB GDDR5)	AMD Radeon R9 M280X (4 GB GDDR5)
RAM	4x 16 GB DDR4-2400	2x 4 GB DDR3-1600
Storage	Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 SSD (512 GB)	Samsung SSD 830 (256 GB)
OS	Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit	Windows 10 64 Bit

4K Monitor	Nvidia driver	AMD driver	Intel driver
2 x Asus PB287Q	ForceWare 378.66	Crimson 17.2.1	15.40.28.4501

Loading Comments

Comment on this article

Editor of the original article: Florian Glaser - Managing Editor Gaming Laptops - 634 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2009

I discovered my interest in computers in my childhood, growing up with MS-DOS and Windows 3.1 in the early 1990s. I was especially fascinated with computer games, even from an early age. From Monkey Island through Lands of Lore to Doom, I tried every game I could get my hands on. I have been working for Notebookcheck since 2009 with my focus mostly being on high-performance gaming laptops.

Translator: Bernie Pechlaner - Senior Tech Writer - 276 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

Ended up in the IT sector in the 90s more or less accidentally and have remained in the industry (as a sysadmin) ever since. Always been interested in laptops - first purchase was - if memory serves correctly - a Toshiba Satellite T2115CS with DX4-75 processor, 4 MB of RAM and 350 MB hard disk drive (and Windows 3.1). To this day, laptops appeal to me - much to the chagrin of my wife, who doesn’t seem understand why we need 5-10 of them at any given time ;-).

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > For Honor Notebook and Desktop Benchmarks

Florian Glaser, Klaus Hinum, 2017-02-23 (Update: 2024-08-15)

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > For Honor (2017)
Pos	Model	low 1280x720 Low Preset	med. 1920x1080 Medium Preset 4xAF TAA	high 1920x1080 High Preset 8xAF TAA	ultra 1920x1080 Extreme Preset 16xAF TAA	4K 3840x2160 High Preset 8xAF TAA
32	NVIDIA Titan RTX	268	245	243	213	101
43	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)	370ⁿ³	273ⁿ³	262ⁿ³	210ⁿ³	99ⁿ³
56	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop)	292.2	222.8	214.8	169.8	78.8
61	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)	297.35ⁿ²	223.15ⁿ²	215.55ⁿ²	171.15ⁿ²	77.2ⁿ²
74	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile		203	195	153	66.9
76	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)	230ⁿ²¹	217ⁿ⁷	217ⁿ⁶	174ⁿ⁶	77.7ⁿ²⁰
77	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	248	219	213	176	79
81	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)	328.8ⁿ²	207.35ⁿ²	198.8ⁿ²	154.25ⁿ²	69.5ⁿ²
84	AMD Radeon VII	226	169	159	121	64
85	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)	306.2ⁿ³	208	198.7	160ⁿ³	63.5
86	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop)	278.6ⁿ³	194.2ⁿ³	186ⁿ³	146.1ⁿ³	63.2ⁿ³
95	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)	305	198	189	138.5ⁿ²	57.7ⁿ²
100	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)	297.3ⁿ²	181.7ⁿ²	174.2ⁿ²	134.55ⁿ²	58.45ⁿ²
106	AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)	269.9	188.7	178.9	143.5	56.7
110	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		164	156	118	50.6
112	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	267.2	165.6ⁿ⁴	157.25ⁿ⁴	126.7ⁿ⁴	55.05ⁿ²
113	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)	265	163	157	122	53
116	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64	276.2ⁿ⁹	161.4ⁿ⁹	158ⁿ⁹	123.7ⁿ⁹	49ⁿ⁹
117	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	265.6	190.1	175.25ⁿ⁴	134.45ⁿ⁴	56.2ⁿ⁴
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >For Honor
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	4K
126	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)			156	122	47.9
128*	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	232	141.25ⁿ²	127.95ⁿ²	96.8ⁿ²	39.7
129	AMD Radeon RX Vega 56	299.8	147.2	140.6	111	45.5
134	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		138	132	103	42.7
136	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)	300.3ⁿ²	158.85ⁿ²	150.2ⁿ²	115ⁿ³	47ⁿ³
139	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q	229.6	161.2	154ⁿ³	115ⁿ³	47.9
140	AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56		142.6	134.9	105.6	43.6
141	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	242.6ⁿ³	154ⁿ³	145.2ⁿ⁶	109.5ⁿ⁶	43.5ⁿ²
144	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)	287.6	137.6	132.2	102.1	42
145	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)	317	139	133	102	42
157	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	241.15ⁿ²	126.1ⁿ³	120.4ⁿ³	92.6ⁿ³	37.8
162	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	293	158	148	108	47.7
164	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	203.9	128.6	122.7ⁿ³	94.2ⁿ³	39.1
172	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980	279	121	115	83.1	35.3
182	AMD Radeon RX 590 (Desktop)	270.6	119.9	113.8	91	35.2
183	AMD Radeon RX 580 (Desktop)	218.1ⁿ²	113.9ⁿ²	108.75ⁿ²	80.9ⁿ²	33.25ⁿ²
188	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop)	275	116	108	78.7	33.4
189	AMD Radeon RX 570 (Desktop)	237.1	99.4	94.7	74.1	29.4
192	AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop)	268	112	107	77	31.6
193	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	216.15ⁿ⁴	106.05ⁿ⁴	98.2ⁿ⁷	71.15ⁿ⁸	30ⁿ³
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >For Honor
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	4K
197	AMD Radeon RX 5500M	184.3	102	97	78.5
202	AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)	164	100	95.7	68.2	26.7
211	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop)	216	81.1	77.6	59.3	23.4
213	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		81.5	77.4	60.1	23.6
218	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970					31.8
219	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q		92.3	87.8	63.9	25.7
224*	NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)	181.6ⁿ²	72.1ⁿ²	69.1ⁿ²	52.75ⁿ²
227	AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)	244	101.2ⁿ²	96.75ⁿ²	68.7ⁿ²	29.6
232*	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q		66.8	63.8	49.4	19.1
242	AMD Radeon R9 290X				76.5	33.6
249	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M	202	85.4	80.1	58.8	23.8
252	AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20	179.3	64.9	61.3	49.1
262	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	156.2ⁿ²	65.8ⁿ⁵	62.1ⁿ⁵	46.1ⁿ⁵
263	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)	198	71.4	68	48.9	19.7
268	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	179	67	63.4	45.8	18.5
276*	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q	146.45ⁿ²	66ⁿ²	65.2ⁿ²	49.95ⁿ²	19.2ⁿ²
284	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)	142.2	60.15ⁿ²	53.1ⁿ²	41.65ⁿ²	13.5
285	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	141.9ⁿ⁴	55.9ⁿ⁶	52.6ⁿ⁶	39ⁿ⁶
291*	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	137.85ⁿ²	53.1ⁿ²	49.8ⁿ²	38.15ⁿ²	14.85ⁿ²
306	AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)	142	52.8	50.6	35
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >For Honor
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	4K
309	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M		52.6	49.9	36.8
310	AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	122	47.4	45.3	34.9
328	AMD Radeon Pro 560X	114	72	41.4	31.2
334	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M	111	41.1	38.6	27.1	10.8
341	AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)	75.7	26.5	25.3	16.3
346	AMD Radeon Pro 555	96.8	34.1	32.6	22.8
348	NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)	97.9	33.4	31.8	23.1	7.2
350	NVIDIA GeForce MX250	82.6	28.8	26.9	21
352	NVIDIA GeForce MX150	79.2ⁿ⁴	29.85ⁿ⁴	29.4ⁿ³	21.4ⁿ³
362*	AMD Radeon RX 540	64	20.5	18.9	14.8
363*	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100	37.8	14.9	11.5	9.2
373	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M	94	35.3	33.2	22.7
374	AMD Radeon Pro 450	82.3	29.3	27.9	19.4
377*	AMD Radeon 540X	59.3	20.2	19.3	15.4
385	AMD Radeon R9 M280X	67	28.6	25.9	21.5
398*	Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	45.9	17.1	15.4	12.3
399*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	44.7	15.6	14.9
446	NVIDIA GeForce MX230	63	21	18.7	15
458	AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	63.9	22.1
475	NVIDIA GeForce MX130	55.7	21.5	20.7	15.9
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >For Honor
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	4K
476	NVIDIA GeForce 940MX	47.55ⁿ²	16.3ⁿ²	15.65ⁿ²	11.7ⁿ²
480	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	50.75ⁿ²	17.1ⁿ²	16.4ⁿ²	13ⁿ²
481	NVIDIA GeForce 940M	43.9	14.3	13.8
482	Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)	39.3	15.3	14.5	11.9
483	NVIDIA GeForce 930MX	43.4	14.2	13.6	10.4
497	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655	41.3	16.1
518	AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)	40.6	14.9
529	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650	39.7	15.2
530	NVIDIA GeForce 930M	39.7
532	AMD Radeon 530	30.3	11.1
538*	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	47.8	17	16.2	12.1
539	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640	32.15ⁿ²	12.25ⁿ²
540	NVIDIA GeForce 920MX	46.7	16.3	15.4	11.5
577*	AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)	20.6	7.1
580	AMD Radeon R7 (Kaveri)	32	11.7
587	NVIDIA GeForce 920M	34.4
600	AMD Radeon 520	26.3	9	8.7
605*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	30.2	11.3	10.7
607	Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	28.4	10.6	10.6
608	Intel UHD Graphics 630	30.7	11.6
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >For Honor
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	4K
611	Intel HD Graphics 630	26.7	10.3
614	Intel HD Graphics 530	23.8	8.4
617	AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)	20.8	6.8
618	Intel UHD Graphics 620	23.9	9.1
619	Intel HD Graphics 620	21.8ⁿ²	8.9
654	Intel HD Graphics 5600	21.9	8.5
680	AMD Radeon HD 8650G	19.8
691	AMD Radeon R5 M255	29.3	17.1
692*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 3	34	9.4	8.9
696	Intel HD Graphics 520	17.4ⁿ²	7.4
697	Intel Iris Graphics 6100	22.7
699	NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M	24.7	14.3
707	AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)	19.9	7.3
720	Intel HD Graphics 4600	11.1
753	Intel UHD Graphics 615	16.4
755	Intel HD Graphics 615	16.8	6.2
797	Intel HD Graphics 515	17.2	6.6
799	Intel HD Graphics 610	13.5
800	Intel HD Graphics 4400	13.1
833	Intel UHD Graphics 605	9
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >For Honor
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	4K
834	Intel HD Graphics 505	12.1
848	AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)	15.1
850	AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)	14.5	4.9
890	Intel UHD Graphics 600	9.3	3
891	Intel HD Graphics 500	8.7

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.