Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

The AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) is an integrated graphics adapter of the weaker mobile dual-core Stoney Ridge APUs. At its launch, it is being used in the AMD A6-9210 and probably has 192 shaders running at up to 600 MHz. The performance can vary heavily depending on the configured TDP and the system memory.

Architecture and Features

The Radeon R5 is equipped with three cores from the third GCN generation (often called GCN 1.2 or 2.0 by the press). This means it is very similar to the Tonga desktop chip and supports DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), but the graphics cores can also be accessed via Mantle, OpenGL, and OpenCL. The GPU supports the HSA 1.0 standard as well and can therefore use the connection with the CPU cores very efficiently. The technical specifications are identical to the Carrizo predecessor. 

The video unit includes the UVD 6 (Unified Video Decoder), which can decode HEVC/H.265 and 4K with support from the hardware. More details are available in our dedicated Stoney Ridge article

Power Consumption

Depending on the model and configured TDP (cTDP), the 28 nm chip is specified with 10 up to 15 Watts. This means it can also be used for thin and light notebooks.

Radeon R (Stoney / Bristol Ridge) Series

Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) compare 512 @ 0.9 GHz64/128 Bit
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) compare 384 @ 0.8 GHz64/128 Bit
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) compare 192 @ 0.8 GHz64 Bit
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) 192 @ 0.6 GHz64 Bit
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) compare 128 @ 0.6 GHz64 Bit
CodenameStoney Ridge
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed600 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12 (FL 12_0), OpenGL 4.4
Power Consumption15 Watt
technology28 nm
FeaturesUVD 6, VCE
Date of Announcement01.06.2016
CPU in Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD A6-92252 x 2600 MHz, 15 W? MHz686 MHz
AMD A6-92202 x 2500 MHz, 10-15 W? MHz655 MHz
AMD A6-92102 x 2400 MHz, 10-15 W? MHz600 MHz
min. - max.? MHz600 - 686 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.3 pt (1%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 3886     avg: 4247     median: 4246.5 (6%)     max: 4607 Points
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
min: 6.6     avg: 7.7     median: 7.7 (3%)     max: 8.8 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
7.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
4.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
4.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
7.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
8.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
11.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
11.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
26.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
7.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
20.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
32.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
6.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
2.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
80.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
12.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
7.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
6.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
8.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
29.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1366x768
17.4
low 1280x720
9.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
15.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
24.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
27.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
20.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x768
7.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1366x768
30  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
32.2 32.4 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.7 20.3 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
48.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
15.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
15.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
30  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
18.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
11.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
90  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
57  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
46.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
18.5 34.6 43 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.6 20.8 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
7.4 17 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.7 6.2 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
39.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
45.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
29.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
44.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
27.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
53.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
25.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
47.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
66.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
39  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
28  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
89.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
24.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Hunt Showdown7.1
Escape from Tarkov8.7
Red Dead Redemption 24.1
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order4.8
Need for Speed Heat7.1
Ghost Recon Breakpoint5
Borderlands 38.2
Control8.1
F1 201911
Total War: Three Kingdoms11.8
Anno 180011.2
Dirt Rally 2.026.3
Far Cry New Dawn3
Metro Exodus7.2
Apex Legends12.3
Just Cause 410
Darksiders III20.65.2
Farming Simulator 1932.411.7
Hitman 26.6
Call of Duty Black Ops 48.8
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider11
F1 201812
Monster Hunter World2.5
Far Cry 53
World of Tanks enCore80.310.7
X-Plane 11.1112.2
Kingdom Come: Deliverance7.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark6.8
ELEX8.9
Middle-earth: Shadow of War15
Team Fortress 22322.6
Dirt 429.4
Rocket League31.3
Ghost Recon Wildlands9.7
For Honor15.1
Resident Evil 724.318
Farming Simulator 173824.8
Battlefield 18.2
Civilization VI27.3
Deus Ex Mankind Divided8.4
Overwatch20.716.9
Ashes of the Singularity7.3
World of Warships3022.1
Metal Gear Solid V2617.9
Dota 2 Reborn3219
Dirt Rally48.816.2
Battlefield Hardline15.112
Dragon Age: Inquisition15.110.9
F1 20143026
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor18.111.6
Sims 49028.8
GRID: Autosport5724.5
GRID 246.328.422.5
BioShock Infinite3215125
Tomb Raider39.419.913.2
Dead Space 345.522.919.5
Counter-Strike: GO29.721.917.8
Diablo III44.831.927.7
Anno 207053.823.715.5
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim25.716.511.3
Deus Ex Human Revolution47.721.9
Dirt 366.9392812.9
StarCraft 289.924.1
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
44
15
4
26
2

10


2








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 16. 16:51:34

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.035s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.035s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.035s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 7445 +0.027s ... 0.062s

#7 got single benchmarks 7445 +0.023s ... 0.085s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.085s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.586s ... 0.67s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.671s

#11 Got 110 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.679s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.679s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.039s ... 0.718s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.854s ... 1.572s

#15 return log +0.035s ... 1.607s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) graphics card

Lenovo Ideapad Slim 1-14AST-05 Review: Chromebook Competitor Brings MS Office 365

Lenovo Ideapad Slim 1-14AST-05 Review: Chromebook Competitor Brings MS Office 365

Lenovo's 14-inch notebook is supposed to make life difficult for Chromebooks. The device scores with a successful keyboard and a one-year MS Office 365 personal...
AMD A6-9220e | AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
HP 255 G6 (A6-9220, Radeon R4) Laptop Review

HP 255 G6 (A6-9220, Radeon R4) Laptop Review

Slow start. With the 255 G6, HP offers a very affordable entry-level notebook. Using an AMD processor and a replaceable battery, our test device could be given ...
AMD A6-9220 | AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) | 15.60" | 2.1 kg
Acer Aspire 3 A315-21 (A6-9220, Radeon R4) Laptop Review

Acer Aspire 3 A315-21 (A6-9220, Radeon R4) Laptop Review

Simple office computer. Acer's 15.6-inch laptop offers an AMD APU from the Stoney Ridge generation, a quick SSD, and an additional 2.5-inch hard drive. The batt...
AMD A6-9220 | AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) | 15.60" | 2.1 kg

Lenovo V145-15 81MT000WMX: unknown, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo V145-15 81MT000WMX

Acer TravelMate B114-21-42BG: AMD A4-9120C, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate B114-21-42BG

Acer Chromebook CB315-2HT-47WG: AMD A4-9120C, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook CB315-2HT-47WG

Acer Chromebook Spin 311 R721T-482Z: AMD A4-9120C, 11.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook Spin 311 R721T-482Z

Lenovo Ideapad S145-15AST-81N30042GE: AMD A6-9225, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad S145-15AST-81N30042GE

Acer Chromebook 15 CB315-2H-4451: AMD A4-9120C, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook 15 CB315-2H-4451

HP Chromebook 11A G6 EE-6HL33EA: AMD A4-9120C, 11.60", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Chromebook 11A G6 EE-6HL33EA

HP 255 G6-4LT47ES: AMD A6-9225, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP 255 G6-4LT47ES

HP Chromebook 14-db0020nr: AMD A4-9120C, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Chromebook 14-db0020nr

Acer Chromebook 315 CB315-2HT: AMD A4-9120C, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook 315 CB315-2HT

Acer Aspire 3 A315-21-651Y: AMD A6-9220, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A315-21-651Y

Lenovo IdeaPad 320-17AST-80XW0011GE: AMD A6-9220, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 320-17AST-80XW0011GE

Lenovo Ideapad 320-15AST-80XV00NJSP: AMD A6-9220, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 320-15AST-80XV00NJSP

HP 255 G6: AMD A6-9220, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP 255 G6

Lenovo Ideapad 320-15AST-80XV00U9SP: AMD A6-9220, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 320-15AST-80XV00U9SP

HP 15-bw090nd: AMD A6-9210, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP 15-bw090nd

HP ProBook 455 G4-Y8B11EA: AMD A6-9210, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » HP ProBook 455 G4-Y8B11EA

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter