Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a mid-range desktop graphics card that was announced early 2014. It is based on the first generation of the Maxwell architecture, namely the GM107 chip. Maxwell sets its focus on energy efficiency and was able to outperform the predecessor Kepler and AMD chips in similar performance regions. The GTX 750 Ti supports DirectX 11.2 but only feature level 11_0.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is comparable to the Nvidia Geforce GTX 860M for laptops that features the same chip with slightly slower clock rates and therefore also performance.

The 3D performance lies between the Radeon R7 260X and R7 265X from AMD or between the GTX 750 and GTX 660 from Nvidia. In our tests, the 750 Ti was not able to achieve playable framerates in demanding games and highest settings in 1920x1080 (see benchmarks below).

The power consumption as already mentioned is a strong suite for the GTX 750 Ti and it excels the e.g. slightly slower Radeon R7 260X by a great margin (gaming).

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GTX 700 Series
GeForce GTX 780 Ti (compare) 2880 @ 875 - 928 (Boost) MHz384 Bit @ 3500 MHz
GeForce GTX 760 (compare) 1152 @ 980 - 1033 (Boost) MHz256 Bit @ 3000 MHz
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 640 @ 1020 - 1085 (Boost) MHz128 Bit @ 2700 MHz
CodenameGM107
ArchitectureMaxwell
Pipelines640 - unified
Core Speed1020 - 1085 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed2700 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 11.2, Shader 5.0
Transistor Count1870 Million
technology28 nm
Features3D Vision, PhysX, CUDA, GPU Boost 2.0, GeForce Experience, Adaptive VSync
Date of Announcement18.02.2014
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.de/object/geforce-gtx-...

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
133  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
130  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
125  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
98  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
65.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
77.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
53.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
196.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
129  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
126.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
76.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
low 1280x720
253.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
178.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
134.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
172.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
94.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
71.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
57  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
67.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
262.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
153.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
100.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
85.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
72.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
60  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
99.1  fps    + Compare