Notebookcheck Logo

Nvidia RTX A2000

NVIDIA RTX A2000

The Nvidia RTX A2000 Desktop GPU is a professional graphics card for small workstation PCs. It is based on the GA106 graphics chip, which is used in the GeForce RTX 3050 or GeForce RTX 3060 consumer graphics cards, among others. However, the GA106 only works with 3,328 active shader units, as well as 26 RT cores and 104 tensor units. The VRAM comprises 12 GB GDDR6 and communicates via a 192-bit memory interface. This results in a memory bandwidth of 288 GB/s.


The professional graphics cards from Nvidia offer certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospecting, visualization applications). This results in many advantages over consumer graphics cards.


Compact design and flexibility:


The RTX A2000 is designed in a low-profile form factor, making it ideal for smaller workstations or systems where space is a limited resource. Despite its compact size, the Nvidia RTX A2000 offers considerable computing power.


The graphics card is ideal for 3D modeling, CAD applications, video editing and visual effects where high precision and speed are paramount. Thanks to the combination of CUDA, Tensor and Raytracing cores, the Nvidia RTX A2000 offers significant performance improvements in the areas of real-time rendering and AI-supported image processing.


Energy efficiency and power consumption:



With a TDP of just 70 watts, the Nvidia RTX A2000 is one of the most energy efficient workstation GPUs on the market. This efficiency makes it possible to be more productive in workflows that require intensive graphics processing without compromising system performance or consuming excessive power.


In summary, the NVIDIA RTX A2000 is a compact, powerful and energy-efficient solution for professional users.

RTX A Series

RTX A5500 Laptop GPU compare 7424 256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU compare 5888 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU compare 6144 @ 1.22 - 1.77 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU compare 5120 @ 0.78 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU compare 4096 @ 1.08 - 1.56 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
RTX A2000 3328 @ 0.56 - 1.2 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU compare 2560 @ 0.89 - 1.69 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
RTX A1000 Laptop GPU compare 2048 128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
RTX A500 Laptop GPU compare 2048 64 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGA106
ArchitectureQuadro Ampere
Pipelines3328 - unified
TMUs104
ROPs48
Raytracing Cores26
Tensor / AI Cores104
Core Speed562 - 1200 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance7987 TFLOPS FP16, 7987 TFLOPS FP32, 0.1248 TFLOPS FP64
Memory Speed12000 effective = 1500 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory12 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth288 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Shader 6.8, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption70 Watt
Transistor Count12 Billion
Die Size 276 mm²
technology8 nm
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 1.4a
Features4x DisplayPort 1.4a, PCIe 4.0 x16
Date of Announcement23.11.2021

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
5.6 pt (17%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
6282 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
5675 Points (12%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
561627 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
310737 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
56330 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
94407 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
14566 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
14934 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
369883 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
48115 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
68223 Points (26%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
20964 Points (25%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
19978 Points (15%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
76281 Points (22%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
71338 Points (39%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
63697 Points (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
43178 Points (56%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
72.1 fps (22%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
70 Seconds (10%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
37 Seconds (14%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
135 fps (33%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
125 fps (18%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
79 fps (14%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
48 fps (12%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
137 fps (37%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
10.2 fps (9%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
117 fps (47%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
129 fps (21%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
162 fps (24%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
138 fps (37%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
239 fps (27%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
79.2 fps (13%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
119 fps (20%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
221 fps (25%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
32.9 fps (11%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
217 fps (32%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
162 fps (25%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
68.8 fps (19%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
271 fps (29%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
33.6 fps (5%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
112 fps (38%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
64 fps (31%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
79.1 fps (21%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
159 fps (16%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
24.2 fps (16%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
126 fps (18%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
15.8 fps (2%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
75.1 fps (34%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
38.8 fps (25%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
49.8 fps (17%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6827 points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
303.9 fps (100%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
371.8 fps (22%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
667 fps (16%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
61.5 fps (11%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
72935 points (19%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
72741 points (18%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
3120 Samples/s (11%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
6758 Samples/s (12%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
15520 points (13%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
119.2 Watt (16%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
244 Watt (31%)
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
0.2 fps per Watt (1%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
78
low 1920x1080
117.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
78.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
64  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
57.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
36.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
18.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
193.2
low 1920x1080
102.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
64.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
49.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
41.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
25.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
13.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
137.3
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
173.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
144.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
104.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
20.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9.7  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
17.9  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
34.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
84  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
32  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
22  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
111
low 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
16  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
7  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
70
low 1920x1080
85.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
60.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
54.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
49.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
34.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
28.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset LowAA 1280x720
201
low 1920x1080
244.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
155.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
87.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
69  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
46.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
447
low 1920x1080
83.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
61.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
51.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
143.8
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
42.9
low 1920x1080
74.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
58.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
50.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
49.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
34.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
18.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
30.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
118.6
Starfield

Starfield

2023
low 1920x1080
77.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
61.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
40.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
26.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
95.7
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
185.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
165.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
111.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
20  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9.4  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
17.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
313
low 1920x1080
110  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
92  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
68  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
50  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1280x720
195
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
32  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
18  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
93
Epic Preset + Epic Ray-Tracing 1920x1080
35
Epic Preset + Epic Ray-Tracing 3840x2160
12
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
197.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
181.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
125.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
350
low 1920x1080
124  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
99.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
34.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
17.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
251
low 1920x1080
198  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
142.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
115.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
62  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
36.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
241
low 1920x1080
86.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
72.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
57.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
38.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
30.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
19.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
126.9
low 1280x720
351  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
181.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
131.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
108.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
78.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
45.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
284
low 1280x720
231  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
106  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
43  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
29  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
141
low 1280x720
199  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
142  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
143  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
131  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
98  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
55  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
144
Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray-Tracing 1920x1080
75
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
180.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
97.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
83.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
68.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
48.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
25.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
115.3
Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR TAA 1920x1080
60.1
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
448  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
204  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
157.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
75.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
53.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
184  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
104  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
68  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
52  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
39  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
405  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
197.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
149.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
101.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
72  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
224  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
108.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
35.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
18.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
162.4
low 1280x720
370.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
116.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
28.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
181  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
106  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
97  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
87  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
62  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
33  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
169.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
56.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
34  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
20.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Quality DXR 16xAF 1920x1080
36.9
low 1280x720
229  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
96.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
86.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
51.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
158.4
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
407  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
166.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
130.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
109.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
79  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
45.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
203  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
108  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
98  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
91  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
61  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
122
low 1280x720
203  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
176.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
136.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
99.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
163.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
82.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
43.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
265.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
234.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
212  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
190.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
86.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
345  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
217  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
117  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
63.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
47.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
40.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
27
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
140.1
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
187.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
187.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
174.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
82.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
57.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
55.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
28
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
187
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
187.6
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Black Myth: Wukong4534261310
Once Human117.778.26457.636.618.3
The First Descendant102.664.649.641.125.613.3
F1 24173.3144.7104.632.520.29.7
Skull & Bones908458393222
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora44393425167
EA Sports WRC85.460.254.249.734.418.6
Total War Pharaoh244.4155.387.36946.223.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty83.961.951.844.725.511
Baldur's Gate 374.958.850.849.934.418.2
Starfield77.361.140.53326.617.1
F1 23185.1165.1111.232.2209.4
Company of Heroes 31109269685028
Returnal656053453218
F1 22197.4181.5125.337.52310.9
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands12499.46651.234.317.7
GRID Legends198142.1115.481.76236.6
God of War86.172.957.438.930.919.9
Farming Simulator 22351181.9131.5108.578.745.2
Forza Horizon 5231121106594329
Guardians of the Galaxy1991421431319855
Far Cry 6180.497.683.268.348.825.7
F1 2021448204157.375.153.428.4
Horizon Zero Dawn18410483685226
F1 2020405197.2149.4101.27238.8
Borderlands 3224108.168.65235.218.7
Total War: Three Kingdoms370.4116.270.548.428.913.8
Far Cry New Dawn18110697876233
Metro Exodus169.67956.944.83420.2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider22996.886.577.451.526.7
Strange Brigade407166.4130.1109.37945.2
Far Cry 520310898916130
X-Plane 11.11203176.4136.499.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark163.182.361.343.924.7
Dota 2 Reborn265.4234.2212190.286.6
The Witcher 334521711763.947.240.1
GTA V187.7187.5174.182.957.855.6
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
10
25

3
19
15
1
10
17
9
2
17
14
2
9
19
7
25
9
2

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 19. 19:08:27

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Aug 2025 05:51:18 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.033s ... 0.034s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.034s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12778 +0.033s ... 0.067s

#8 got single benchmarks 12778 +0.012s ... 0.079s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.079s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.149s ... 1.228s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.229s

#12 Got 225 rows for game benchmarks. +0.03s ... 1.259s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.259s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.027s ... 1.285s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.444s ... 1.729s

#16 return log +0.009s ... 1.738s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Class 3

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-09- 7)