Notebookcheck Logo

IMG BXM-8-256

Imagination IMG BXM-8-256

The Imagination IMG BXM-8-256 is an integrated graphics card for ARM-SoCs. It first appeared in the mid-range MediaTek Dimensity 930 (6nm) clocked at up to 900 MHz. The iGPU is based on the B-Series architecture that should be about 30% more power efficient than the previous generation (PowerVR). According to Imagination the BXM-8-256 MC1 (single core) offers 8 texels / clock and 256 FP32 / clock. The wavefront width is 128 Bit.

The GPU supports OpenGL ES 3.X, Vulkan 1.3, OpenCL 3.0, and Android NN HAL.

IMG B-Series Series

IMG BXM-8-256 @ 0.9 GHz64 Bit
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1 compare
CodenameB-Series
ArchitectureB-Series
Core Speed900 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Shared Memoryno
APIOpenGL ES 3.x, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
technology6 nm
Date of Announcement09.09.2014
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.imaginationtech.com
CPU in IMG BXM-8-256GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 70608 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 70258 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 70208 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 9308 x 2000 MHz? MHz900 MHz
min. - max.? MHz900 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
0 Points (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
0 Points (0%)
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
0 Points (0%)
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
0 Points (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3172     avg: 3338     median: 3419 (15%)     max: 3423 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3278     avg: 3365     median: 3404 (7%)     max: 3413 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2345     avg: 2513     median: 2551 (11%)     max: 2612 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2163     avg: 2325     median: 2344 (6%)     max: 2416 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 3172     avg: 3330     median: 3378 (30%)     max: 3440 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 3221     avg: 3385     median: 3445 (21%)     max: 3488 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 2386     avg: 2508     median: 2553 (13%)     max: 2586 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 2368     avg: 2409     median: 2420 (8%)     max: 2440 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.6     avg: 2.8     median: 2.9 (1%)     max: 3 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 6.6     avg: 6.9     median: 6.9 (1%)     max: 7.1 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 20     avg: 20.1     median: 20 (1%)     max: 21 fps
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 17     avg: 18     median: 18 (2%)     max: 19 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 25     avg: 32     median: 34.5 (1%)     max: 35 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 61     avg: 62.2     median: 62 (3%)     max: 63 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 72     avg: 73.3     median: 73.5 (1%)     max: 74 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 97300     avg: 99703     median: 99542 (10%)     max: 102429 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 50589     avg: 60777     median: 52732 (4%)     max: 79011 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 30.78     avg: 33.7     median: 34.9 (1%)     max: 35.77 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 139     avg: 151     median: 157 (0%)     max: 157 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 134     avg: 146     median: 152 (0%)     max: 152 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
24737 Points (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
11252 Points (15%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.91     avg: 4.3     median: 3.8 (1%)     max: 7.46 Watt
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01234567Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
35 37.9 43.5 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
24 24.7 25.9 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
60 82 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
39.6 39.7 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
29  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
29.7 29.8 30 30 30 39 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
115  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
30 59 59.4 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
58.1 59.3 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
90 120 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact3925
Armajet71
PUBG Mobile402931
Dead Trigger 2115
Asphalt 9: Legends4959
Subway Surfers105
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3

1



2
3
1








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 08. 04:00:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 07 Nov 2025 05:37:39 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11586 +0.015s ... 0.045s

#8 got single benchmarks 11586 +0.027s ... 0.071s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.071s

#10 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.076s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.027s ... 0.104s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.029s ... 0.133s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.025s ... 0.158s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.431s ... 0.588s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.588s

#16 Got 26 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.596s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.596s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.599s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +0.042s ... 0.64s

#20 return log +0.003s ... 0.644s

Notebook reviews with IMG BXM-8-256 graphics card

Oukitel WP60 in review.

One of the largest smartphone displays of all time - Oukitel WP60 smartphone review

A stylish metal casing, a huge screen and a very large battery are the most important features of the Oukitel WP60. The fact that it is a phone for outdoors is ...
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | IMG BXM-8-256 | 7.20" | 360 g
Cubot KingKong 11 review

Phone for harsh environments with night vision and two displays – Cubot KingKong 11 smartphone review

With the Cubot KingKong 11, you can always keep an eye on the time and notifications thanks to the second display on the back. The outdoor smartphone also has a...
MediaTek Dimensity 7020 | IMG BXM-8-256 | 6.72" | 419 g
Motorola Moto G56

Affordable mid-range with solid selling points - Motorola Moto G56 smartphone review

The Motorola Moto G56 demonstrates how much smartphone you can get for under $275. In our review, the robust mid-range phone not only impresses with its attract...
MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | IMG BXM-8-256 | 6.72" | 200 g
Test Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G smartphone (Image source: Marcus Herbrich)

Entry-level standout with long update support – Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G review

Despite its low price, the Poco M7 Pro offers impressive value for money. A 3.5 mm headphone jack and a microSD card slot, together with IP certification, are f...
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | IMG BXM-8-256 | 6.67" | 190 g
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (image source: Manuel Masiero)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G review - The powerful entry-level smartphone with a big price advantage

Xiaomi's new entry-level phone, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G, can already be had for as low as $250. For this price, you get a lot of smartphone, including a 120...
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | IMG BXM-8-256 | 6.67" | 190 g

Motorola Moto G55: MediaTek Dimensity 7025, 6.49", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Moto G55 smartphone review - Inexpensive doesn't have to be boring

Motorola Moto G54: MediaTek Dimensity 7020, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Moto G54 review - One of the best smartphones for less than 200 Euros

CAT S75: MediaTek Dimensity 930, 6.58", 0.3 kg
  Review » Caterpillar CAT S75 review - Outdoor smartphone with satellite communication and underwater camera

Motorola Moto G73 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 930, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Moto G73 5G review - Brilliant despite its lacklustre display?

Cubot KingKong 11: MediaTek Dimensity 7020, 6.72", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Cubot KingKong 11

Oukitel WP55 Pro: MediaTek Dimensity 7025, 6.60", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Oukitel WP55 Pro

Oukitel WP55: MediaTek Dimensity 7025, 6.60", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Oukitel WP55

Motorola Moto G56: MediaTek Dimensity 7060, 6.72", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G56

Honor 400 Lite: MediaTek Dimensity 7025, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 400 Lite

Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 7025, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G

Honor X9c Smart: unknown, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor X9c Smart

Honor X60: unknown, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor X60

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 7025, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G

Motorola Moto G55: MediaTek Dimensity 7025, 6.49", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G55

Motorola Moto G64: MediaTek Dimensity 7020, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G64

Motorola Moto G Power 5G 2024: MediaTek Dimensity 7020, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G Power 5G 2024

Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 7020, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G

Infinix Note 40 Pro+: MediaTek Dimensity 7020, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Note 40 Pro+

Motorola Moto G54 Power Edition: MediaTek Dimensity 7020, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G54 Power Edition

Motorola Moto G54: MediaTek Dimensity 7020, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G54

Motorola Moto G Power 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 930, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G Power 5G

Motorola Defy 2: MediaTek Dimensity 930, 6.60", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Motorola Defy 2

CAT S75: MediaTek Dimensity 930, 6.58", 0.3 kg
  External Review » CAT S75

Motorola Moto G73 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 930, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G73 5G

Motorola Moto G56: MediaTek Dimensity 7060, 6.72", 0.2 kg
   » Verdict on the Motorola Moto G56: Lots of features for little money

Motorola Moto G55: MediaTek Dimensity 7025, 6.49", 0.2 kg
   » Motorola Moto G56 vs. Moto G55 in mid-range duel: All differences in detail

Motorola Moto G56: MediaTek Dimensity 7060, 6.72", 0.2 kg
   » Motorola Moto G56 vs. Moto G55 in mid-range duel: All differences in detail

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G: MediaTek Dimensity 7025, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Verdict on Xiaomi's Redmi Note 14 5G: Budget-friendly smartphone impresses with powerful hardware

Motorola Moto G54: MediaTek Dimensity 7020, 6.50", 0.2 kg
   » Motorola Moto G54 – The 200-Euro smartphone delivers a convincing performance in our test

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 2

Arc B 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Class 3

Adreno 825 *
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU *
A19 GPU *
A19 Pro 5-Core GPU *
A18 Pro GPU *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
DXT-48-1536 *
A18 GPU *
A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A17 Pro GPU *
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC16 *
Immortalis-G925 MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC11 *
Adreno 750 *
Xclipse 950 *
Xclipse 940 *
Adreno 740 *
Immortalis-G720 MP12 *
Immortalis-G715 MP11 *
A16 GPU 5-Core *
Adreno 725 *
Adreno 722 *
Mali-G720 MP7 *
Adreno 735 *
A15 GPU 5-Core *
A16 GPU 4-Core *
Adreno 732 *
Adreno 730 *
Mali-G715 MP7 *
Mali-G615 MP6 *
Adreno 720 *
Mali-G710 MP10 *
A15 GPU 4-Core *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Maleoon 920 *
Xclipse 920 *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
Mali-G710 MP7 *
Mali-G78 MP22 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 650 *
Mali-G78 MP20 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-04-28)