Notebookcheck Logo

Motorola Moto G54 review - One of the best smartphones for less than 200 Euros

Smart buy. The Motorola Moto G54 shows that you don't have to spend a lot of money to get a good, well-rounded smartphone suitable for everyday tasks. The 6.5-inch smartphone from Motorola scores with a fast 120-Hz IPS display, a surprisingly good 50 MP camera, 5G including eSIM, and 256 GB of storage. Find out from our test how the Android 13 smartphone fares in practice.
Motorola Moto G54

With the Moto G54, Motorola targets price conscious buyers. Although the 6.5-inch Android smartphone costs barely 200 Euros (~$211), it still brings very solid midrange equipment.

In addition to the MediaTek Dimensity 7020 octa-core SoC that is able to run games such as PUBG Mobile smoothly, there is 8 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage space. This is accompanied by a 50-MP main camera, Android 13 with 3 years of updates, dual-SIM including eSIM, a large 5000-mAh battery, and an IPS display with a 1080p resolution and 120 Hz refresh rate.

With this, the Moto G54 offers a lot more on paper than its Moto G53 predecessor, which uses the slower Snapdragon 480+ and only reaches a display resolution of 1600 x 720 pixels. We evaluate in our test, whether the successor is able to stand up against the powerful competitors.

good (81%) Motorola Moto G54 MediaTek Dimensity 7020IMG BXM-8-256 Smartphone - 10/27/2023 - v7
Test device courtesy of Motorola Germany
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
Motorola Moto G54 (Moto G50 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 7020 8 x 2 - 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 128GB / 256GB, 237 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: fingerprint reader, proximity sensor, accelerometer, ambient light sensor, gyroscope, SAR sensor, sensor hub, E-compass, eSIM support, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, Miracast, Dolby Atmos
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/5/8), 4G (Band 1/2/3/5/7/8/20/26/28/32/38/40/41/42), 5G (Band n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n77/n78), Dual SIM, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 161.6 x 73.8 ( = 0.31 x 6.36 x 2.91 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix MP (f/1.8, 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS) + 2 MP (f/2.4, 1.75µm); videos up to 1080p@60fps
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.4, 1.0µm; videos up to 1080p@30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 20W charger (12V/1.67A), USB cable, guides, SIM tool, Motorola MyUX, 24 Months Warranty, Head SAR 0.86 W/kg, Body SAR 1.38 W/kg, fanless
Weight
177 g ( = 6.24 oz / 0.39 pounds), Power Supply: 58 g ( = 2.05 oz / 0.13 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80.7 %
10/2023
Motorola Moto G54
Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256
177 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.50"2400x1080
79.1 %
03/2023
Motorola Moto G53
SD 480+, Adreno 619
183 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720
78.7 %
05/2023
Nokia G22
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
195 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.52"1600x720
75.9 %
07/2023
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
201 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.60"2408x1080
79 %
08/2023
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2
198.5 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.79"2460x1080
81.7 %
06/2023
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
SD 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619
189 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080

Case - Also available in vegan leather

The light, 177-gram (~6.24 oz) plastic case of the Moto G54 offers a good workmanship and is comfortable to hold in the hand with its rounded corners and edges. With the exception of the bottom, the bezels around the IPS panel are fairly slim, resulting in a solid display-to-surface ratio of 86%.

The power key also includes a built-in fingerprint sensor. There is a dual-lens camera system in the back, which consists of a 50-MP main camera and a 2-MP resolution macro sensor.

If you decide for one of the two Glacier Blue or Midnight Blue color versions, the smartphone comes with a smooth plastic back. With the Indigo Blue or the Mint Green of our test unit, the back cover of the smartphone is made of vegan leather, which feels great in the hand and provides it with a better grip and higher-quality haptics.

The smartphone doesn't offer an IP certification, but Motorola only speaks about a water-repellent design that is supposed to provide the Moto G54 with some protection from splash water and raindrops.

Motorola Moto G54
Motorola Moto G54
Motorola Moto G54
Motorola Moto G54
Motorola Moto G54
Motorola Moto G54
Motorola Moto G54
Motorola Moto G54

Size Comparison

167.7 mm / 6.6 inch 78 mm / 3.07 inch 9.1 mm / 0.3583 inch 201 g0.4431 lbs168.6 mm / 6.64 inch 76.3 mm / 3 inch 8.2 mm / 0.3228 inch 198.5 g0.4376 lbs165.9 mm / 6.53 inch 76.2 mm / 3 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 189 g0.4167 lbs165 mm / 6.5 inch 76.2 mm / 3 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 195 g0.4299 lbs162.7 mm / 6.41 inch 74.7 mm / 2.94 inch 8.2 mm / 0.3228 inch 183 g0.4034 lbs161.6 mm / 6.36 inch 73.8 mm / 2.91 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 177 g0.3902 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch 105 mm / 4.13 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Equipment - 8 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage for the Motorola smartphone

The EU version of the Moto G54 offers the same storage equipment for all the color versions with 8 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage space. This can be expanded via the microSD slot that is able to accept a card with up to 1 TB of storage.

The equipment of Motorola's midrange smartphone also includes a dual-SIM function including eSIM, NFC, and wireless mirroring of the display contents via Miracast. The USB-C port runs at USB-2.0 speed and supports USB-OTG, allowing you to connect USB peripheral devices. A 3.5-mm audio port and Dolby Atmos compatible stereo speakers are also included. With the support of DRM Widevine L1, streams can also be displayed in HD quality on the Moto G54.

Left: Nano SIM/microSD card slot
Left: Nano SIM/microSD card slot
Right: power button, volume rocker
Right: power button, volume rocker
Top: microphone
Top: microphone
Bottom: 3.5-mm audio port, microphone, USB-C 2.0, speaker
Bottom: 3.5-mm audio port, microphone, USB-C 2.0, speaker

microSD Card Reader

The microSD card slot of the Moto G54 reaches a good copy speed of 36.2 MB/s using our Angelbird AV Pro V60 reference card. In the Cross Platform Disk Test, it is also fairly fast with a top value of 78.1 MB/s.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
50 MB/s +38%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash (Angelbird V60)
36.2 MB/s
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
26.8 MB/s -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
23.14 MB/s -36%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
19.6 MB/s -46%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
18.7 MB/s -48%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.3 (21.6-47.4)
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.6 (30.1-45.4)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø34.3 (26.7-47.7)
Xiaomi Redmi 12 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.3 (25.7-45.6)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.3 (4.86-48.5)
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.9 (29.9-78.1)
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.1 (39-81.8)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.3 (37-79.3)
Xiaomi Redmi 12 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø68.8 (25.3-76.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø61.2 (29.9-79.8)

Software - Android 13 and 3 years of security updates

Motorola has equipped its midrange smartphone with Android 13, adding its inhouse MyUX user interface on top. There is only a handful of additional software apps such as the inhouse apps Moto, Moto Secure, and Family Space. Although a few third-party apps such as TikTok or Marketguru are also included, they can all be deinstalled. After the initial setup, 237 GB of the nominal 256 GB of storage are still available.

The Moto Secure app allows you to adjust your privacy settings, hide some apps and files in a secure file folder, and recognize Phishing attempts, among other things. With Family Space, users can setup a separate secure Start screen for their children, where only some selected apps are available.

The Moto app allows you to configure the Motorola-typical UI gestures that facilitate operation. For example, you get the following presets: If you make a hacking gesture with the smartphone twice, the flashlight is activated. A quick turning the phone twice will activate the camera. 

According to the manufacturer, the Moto G54 is supposed to receive Android security patches until September 2026, which is three years after its market introduction in September of 2023. New security patches are supposed to be available every two months. However, at the time of our test, the manufacturer is slightly behind schedule, since the security patches are still at the level of August 1 at the end of October, so they aren't quite current, compared to Motorola's own specifications.

Motorola is a little more hesitant with the Android OS upgrades than with the Android security updates. Although the smartphone is supposed to receive Android 14, the manufacturer's website doesn't provide any information whether there will be any additional OS upgrades in the future such as to Android 15. But usually, you can expect two OS updates with Motorola smartphones.

Motorola Moto G54
Motorola Moto G54
Motorola Moto G54
Motorola Moto G54
Motorola Moto G54
Motorola Moto G54
Motorola Moto G54
Motorola Moto G54

Communication and GNSS - 5G and stable WiFi 5

The Moto G54 can connect to the mobile Internet via 13 5G bands and 14 4G bands. So while the frequency support isn't too generous, you still shouldn't run into any problems at least within EU countries. In addition, all the 5G bands that are important in German speaking countries (n1/n3/n28 /n78) are supported. The Motorola also supports Bluetooth 5.3 and NFC.

On the other hand, the Moto G54 doesn't offer WiFi 6 but like most other devices in this price class is limited to WiFi 5. When connected with our Asus ROG Rapture AXE 11000 reference router, the smartphone does a good job, though.

In the WLAN, not only is the Moto G54 one of the fastest devices in our test, but at up to 365 Mbit/s, it almost reaches the maximum possible transfer rates you can get with WiFi 5 in practice. In addition, the transfer rates remain fairly stable in both the receiving and sending directions.

Networking
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
365 (min: 347) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
306 (min: 277) MBit/s ∼45%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
345 (min: 317) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
358 (min: 319) MBit/s ∼52%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
315 (min: 226) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
362 (min: 319) MBit/s ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
337 (min: 68) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
365 (min: 331) MBit/s ∼53%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
317 (min: 284) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
367 (min: 341) MBit/s ∼54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
347 (min: 336) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
363 (min: 349) MBit/s ∼53%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
651 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
685 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼100%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Motorola Moto G54 MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø365 (347-383)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mediatek Helio G80, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø328 (68-354)
Motorola Moto G54 MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø306 (277-341)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mediatek Helio G80, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø365 (331-379)
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception outdoors
GPS reception outdoors

The Motorola smartphone determines its current location using the GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1), Beidou (B1), and QZSS satellite navigation services. Both outdoors and indoors, it succeeds very quickly in locating its position with an accuracy of 1 meter (3 ft).

However, the GPS precision of the Moto G54 isn't quite as accurate when moving, although it is still overall sufficient for navigation tasks. In a short bike tour, the smartphone at times locates us as accurately as the Garmin Venu 2 fitness smartwatch, but at other times the recorded location can also be quite far away from the actual route. Such inaccuracies can occur both in more as well as less densely occupied areas.

Motorola Moto G54: overall route
Motorola Moto G54: overall route
Motorola Moto G54: across the bridge
Motorola Moto G54: across the bridge
Motorola Moto G54: turing point
Motorola Moto G54: turing point
Garmin Venu2: overall route
Garmin Venu2: overall route
Garmin Venu2: across the bridge
Garmin Venu2: across the bridge
Garmin Venu2: turning point
Garmin Venu2: turning point

Telephone Functions and Voice Quality

With its voice quality, the Moto G54 delivers a good performance. The conversation partners are able to understand each other easily even in noisier surroundings. Only when using speaker mode do the voices sound a bit dull and distanced at times.

The Moto G54 supports dual-SIM operation that works using a combination of Nano-SIM and eSIM. You can also setup a preferred SIM card for data. The smartphone supports VoLTE and WLAN calls.

Cameras - Very good for this price class

Picture taken with the selfie camera
Picture taken with the selfie camera

The back of the Moto G54 houses a dual-camera system, although only half of it is really useful. Behind the lower lens is a 2-MP resolution macro camera that works optimally with objects at a distance of 4 cm (~1.6 in), but its image quality is rather mediocre. With its digital zoom, the main camera usually delivers much better results.

The main camera of the Motorola offers a 50-MP resolution (f/1.8) with optical stabilization. Four neighboring pixels are combined into a single pixel, resulting in 12 MP images. Under good light conditions, the sensor captures the objects with a fairly good sharpness and contrast, even if the colors can look a bit pale at times. Surprisingly, the camera is also able to take convincing pictures in bad light conditions, with many details remaining visible even with only a little amount of light. Overall, the Moto G54 achieves a really good image quality for its price class.

The good overall impression is also supported by the selfie camera. It has a 16-MP resolution, produces a solid Bokeh effect in Portrait mode, and is able to create sharp pictures even in difficult light conditions. Videos can be recorded at a maximum of 720p and 30 frames per second. The main camera allows recording videos at a maximum of 1080p and 60 fps.

Picture taken with the main camera
Picture taken with the main camera
Picture taken with the main camera
Picture taken with the main camera
Picture taken with the main camera
Picture taken with the main camera

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2Lowlight-Aufnahme
click to load images

We also take a detailed look at the main camera under controlled light conditions. In optimal light conditions, it is able to reproduce the colors fairly accurately, particularly succeeding with a good white balance. The test chart remains completely visible even with 1 Lux of remaining light, although it is then only reproduced blurry.

ColorChecker
3.4 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
9 ∆E
7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G54: 9.35 ∆E min: 3.39 - max: 16.85 ∆E
ColorChecker
18.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
16 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
18 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G54: 17.52 ∆E min: 8.35 - max: 25.48 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty - With 20-Watt charger and optional Moto Care

Motorola includes a 20-Watt charger, a USB cable (Type A to C), a SIM tool, a quick start manual, and an additional booklet with some security information in the box of the Moto G54. Buyers can also purchase accessories such as headsets and Bluetooth speakers in the Motorola shop.

There is a 24-month warranty on the Motorola Moto G54. In addition, you also have the option to extend the warranty to three years and also add some accident protection with the Moto Care insurance. Depending on the chosen package, this costs between 32 and 70 Euros (~$34-74) at the time of this test.

Input Devices and Operation - A 120-Hz panel and fingerprint sensor

The 120-Hz display provides the Moto G54 with a comfortably smooth operation. In the standard setting, the smartphone automatically switches between 60 and 120 Hz depending on the display contents. Alternatively, you can also fix the display to use 120 Hz or 60 Hz, choosing the latter for example to save some battery life.

The MediaTek Dimensity 7020 and 8 GB of RAM also contribute to the mostly smooth running of the system. However at times, it also becomes noticeable that the smartphone doesn't use the fastest hardware, although stutters and really noticeable delays remain the rare exception in our test.

You can biometrically unlock the Motorola via face recognition or the fingerprint sensor that is built into the power key. While 2D face unlock isn't quite as secure as logging in via fingerprint, it still works fairly well with only a little surrounding light left, as long as the display is bright enough.

Keyboard in landscape orientation
Keyboard in landscape orientation
Keyboard in portrait orientation
Keyboard in portrait orientation

Display - IPS panel with 1080p resolution

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

The IPS panel of the Moto G54 has a 2400 x 1080 pixel resolution, resulting in a pixel density of 405 PPI. Compared to the Moto G53 with its meager 1600 x 720 pixels, this is a significant improvement. HDR10 and HDR HLG are supported.

With an average brightness of 470 cd/m² with a pure white screen content, the IPS display of the Motorola smartphone reaches a brightness that is typical for this price class and also offered by other competitors such as the Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE or the Xiaomi Redmi 12. In the APL18 measurement, which is more representative for everyday usage and concentrates on a smaller display area, the brightness increases up to 582 cd/m². At the lowest brightness level, we measure 2.8 cd/m².

Motorola doesn't use pulse width modulation to adjust the display brighness, which makes it well-suited for users who are sensitive to PWM flickering.

471
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 492 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 470 cd/m² Minimum: 2.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 492 cd/m²
Contrast: 1640:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.275
Motorola Moto G54
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Motorola Moto G53
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Nokia G22
IPS, 1600x720, 6.52
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Xiaomi Redmi 12
IPS, 2460x1080, 6.79
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
8%
-3%
-69%
-5%
44%
Brightness middle
492
587
19%
674
37%
465
-5%
449
-9%
658
34%
Brightness
470
559
19%
641
36%
439
-7%
437
-7%
663
41%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
90
0%
89
-1%
95
6%
98
9%
Black Level *
0.3
0.4
-33%
0.43
-43%
0.47
-57%
0.5
-67%
Contrast
1640
1468
-10%
1567
-4%
989
-40%
898
-45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.9
2.6
33%
4.45
-14%
8.5
-118%
2.29
41%
1.4
64%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.26
5.62
10%
7.41
-18%
15.8
-152%
4.49
28%
2.7
57%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.3
3.3
23%
5.1
-19%
11.8
-174%
3.7
14%
1.7
60%
Gamma
2.275 97%
2.463 89%
2.072 106%
2.2 100%
2.254 98%
2.23 99%
CCT
7656 85%
6288 103%
7799 83%
10757 60%
6198 105%
6504 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18170 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Measurement series at fixed zoom level and with various brightness settings

The display colors of the Moto G54 can be adjusted using two color profiles. The default is Saturated, which provides the smartphone with a vivid but not very accurate color reproduction. If you use the Natural color profile, the contrast ratio remains high (1640:1), but the color and grayscale reproduction won't improve much with a maximum Delta-E color deviation of 4.3.

Overall, the color display is slightly too cool or shifted towards a blue tint at 7656 K. For a more balanced color reproduction, we therefore recommend moving the color temperature slide in the Android Settings by one or two steps towards the Warm setting.

Color accuracy (Natural color profile)
Color accuracy (Natural color profile)
Grayscale (Natural color profile)
Grayscale (Natural color profile)
Saturation (Natural color profile)
Saturation (Natural color profile)
sRGB color space (Natural color profile)
sRGB color space (Natural color profile)
AdobeRGB color space (Natural color profile)
AdobeRGB color space (Natural color profile)
DCI-P3 color space (Natural color profile)
DCI-P3 color space (Natural color profile)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.6 ms rise
↘ 9.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
27.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.6 ms rise
↘ 12.9 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34 ms).

The Moto G54 does well using it outdoors, since the contents still remain readable even in direct sunlight. But overall, the brightness of the panel isn't particularly high enough to always be able to compensate sufficiently for bright light conditions. The viewing angles of the IPS panel are stable. 

Outdoor use (in direct sunlight)
Outdoor use (in direct sunlight)
Outdoor use (in the shade)
Outdoor use (in the shade)
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance - Moto G54 with MediaTek Dimensity 7020

Motorola uses the MediaTek Dimensity 7020 as SoC in the Moto G54. The octa-core processor sounds new but is only a new iteration of the known old Dimensity 930 midrange processor. The SoC integrates two ARM Cortex A78 cores with up to 2.2 GHz for demanding tasks and six energy efficient ARM Cortex-A55 cores with clock speeds of up to 2 GHz. The graphics unit in the Dimensity 7020 is the IMG BXM-8-256.

In the synthetic benchmarks, the Moto G54 is one of the fastest smartphones in our comparison and is able to clearly surpass its Moto G53 predecessor. Our test unit is also slightly faster overall than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G that uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 as its processor. 

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=212, last 2 years)
905 Points +30%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
697 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
 
697 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
642 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
558 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
375 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
350 Points -50%
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
310 Points -56%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=212, last 2 years)
2952 Points +55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
1954 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1903 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
 
1903 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1632 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1334 Points -30%
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1318 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1284 Points -33%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=87, last 2 years)
1431 Points +56%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
916 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
 
916 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
434 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
413 Points -55%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=87, last 2 years)
3924 Points +70%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2315 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
 
2315 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1384 Points -40%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1223 Points -47%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=150, last 2 years)
745069 Points +71%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
436096 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
 
436096 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
317725 Points -27%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
272388 Points -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
13268 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
 
13268 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=205, last 2 years)
11592 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10093 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9290 Points -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
7953 Points -40%
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6637 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5720 Points -57%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1443, n=153, last 2 years)
833 Points +33%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
628 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
 
628 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
546 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
539 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
348 Points -45%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
322 Points -49%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=154, last 2 years)
5666 Points +50%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
3773 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
 
3773 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
3337 Points -12%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3236 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2396 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2226 Points -41%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)
9588 Points +39%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
6911 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
 
6911 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
6437 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6157 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5104 Points -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4465 Points -35%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12306, n=154, last 2 years)
6175 Points +23%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
5004 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
 
5004 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
4065 Points -19%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3782 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3358 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2650 Points -47%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)
13776 Points +228%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4200 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
 
4200 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
4001 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2876 Points -32%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1954 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1811 Points -57%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)
1482 Points +6%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1394 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
 
1394 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1263 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
1184 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1125 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1002 Points -28%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=139, last 2 years)
22736 Points +278%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
6014 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
 
6014 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
5395 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
5242 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3630 Points -40%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3367 Points -44%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 128240, n=93, last 2 years)
12131 Points +1302%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3367 Points +289%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
865 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
 
865 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
780 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
424 Points -51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
Points -100%

In the GPU-heavy benchmarks, the Moto G54 also places far ahead in its price class, even though it is at times surpassed by its predecessor. With its Adreno 619 GPU, the Moto G53 is quite a bit faster at times, particularly in GFXBench. The Moto G54 is not compatible with the Wild Life tests from 3DMark.

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
3069 Points
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2901 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2677 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2410 Points -21%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2150 Points -30%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2948 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2347 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2232 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1260 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1139 Points -61%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2974 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2413 Points -19%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2363 Points -21%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1388 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1290 Points -57%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
3524 Points
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3387 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3231 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2694 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2502 Points -29%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2590 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2412 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2397 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1178 Points -51%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1177 Points -51%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2709 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2638 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2580 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1346 Points -48%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1334 Points -48%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
103 fps +49%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
69 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps -16%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
37 fps -46%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps -52%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
85 fps +15%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 fps +9%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
74 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
46 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps -45%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -70%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
68 fps +19%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
57 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps -37%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -56%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps -60%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps -61%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
62 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps -31%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps -34%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps -58%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps -63%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -77%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
55 fps +67%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
33 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -24%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -48%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -58%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps -61%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
35 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -11%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29 fps -17%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -57%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.7 fps -75%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29 fps +61%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
18 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -17%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.3 fps -48%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.6 fps -58%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.6 fps -58%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
19 fps
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17 fps -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -11%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps -47%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9 fps -53%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.2 fps -73%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps +82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
11 fps
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.4 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4.8 fps -56%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
4.7 fps -57%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.9 fps +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.1 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
7.1 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.4 fps -52%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps -55%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2 fps -72%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
31 fps +63%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
19 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -11%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -47%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.8 fps -59%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
20 fps
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
18 fps -10%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.5 fps -52%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps -57%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.5 fps -72%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.1 fps +3%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
3 fps
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2.9 fps -3%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1.5 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps -53%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
0.85 fps -72%

The Motorola smartphone is the fastest of the comparison devices running the browser benchmarks, placing on top in each of the individual tests. In everyday operation, web pages load quickly and can be scrolled smoothly.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=165, last 2 years)
104.7 Points +22%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
85.936 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
85.9 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)
69.475 Points -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
58.044 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
40.02 Points -53%
Xiaomi Redmi 12 (Chrome 115)
28.105 Points -67%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=149, last 2 years)
104.8 runs/min +37%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
76.5 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
76.5 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
48.5 runs/min -37%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)
47.78 runs/min -38%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
32 runs/min -58%
Xiaomi Redmi 12 (Chrome 115)
20.6 runs/min -73%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=145, last 2 years)
98.3 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
97 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
97 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)
77 Points -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
68 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
44 Points -55%
Xiaomi Redmi 12 (Chrome 115)
31 Points -68%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (37 - 304, n=119, last 2 years)
132.5 Points +10%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
120 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
120 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
91 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
60 Points -50%
Xiaomi Redmi 12 (Chrome 115)
43 Points -64%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=200, last 2 years)
33470 Points +16%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
28919 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
28919 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)
20938 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
19867 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
11782 Points -59%
Nokia G22 (Chrome 112)
10858 Points -62%
Xiaomi Redmi 12 (Chrome 115)
7611 Points -74%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi 12 (Chrome 115)
5572.6 ms * -298%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
3347 ms * -139%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
2117.2 ms * -51%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)
1829.3 ms * -31%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=163, last 2 years)
1655 ms * -18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
1400 ms * -0%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
1399.8 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Motorola doesn't offer any concrete specification on the storage type, but considering the performance data, we assume that our European test unit uses UFS 3.0 storage. This might be different for other international versions, since Motorola offers the Moto G54 in other markets at times also as a model with UFS 2.2 storage.

The UFS 3.0 storage seems to be a good thing for the Moto G54, since it allows the smartphone to move far ahead of the competitors in the 4 KB reads and writes as well as the other reading and writing processes.

Motorola Moto G54Motorola Moto G53Nokia G22Samsung Galaxy A14 LTEXiaomi Redmi 12Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-47%
-33%
-74%
-62%
-35%
0%
25%
Sequential Read 256KB
983.01
474.6
-52%
881
-10%
298.69
-70%
300
-69%
520.09
-47%
1573 ?(983 - 1789, n=21)
60%
1452 ?(215 - 4512, n=207, last 2 years)
48%
Sequential Write 256KB
817.55
243.87
-70%
367
-55%
200.17
-76%
272.5
-67%
505.55
-38%
559 ?(387 - 818, n=21)
-32%
1060 ?(57.5 - 3643, n=207, last 2 years)
30%
Random Read 4KB
232.74
166.24
-29%
131
-44%
55.9
-76%
84.8
-64%
170.61
-27%
209 ?(168.5 - 265, n=21)
-10%
240 ?(22.2 - 543, n=207, last 2 years)
3%
Random Write 4KB
224.58
139.83
-38%
172
-23%
55.86
-75%
115
-49%
161.26
-28%
186.4 ?(24.8 - 272, n=21)
-17%
264 ?(13 - 709, n=207, last 2 years)
18%

Games - PUBG Mobile runs at 30 frames per second

The Motorola Moto G54 shows that even a smartphone that costs less than 200 Euros (~$211) can be well-suited for gaming. In our Gamebench test tool, the 6.5-inch smartphone is able to run PUBG Mobile in the HD/High setting at a constant 30 frames per second. The same goes for Asphalt 9, which is also displayed at a constant 30 fps in the Standard graphics settings.

The Moto G54 is only able to make full use of its 120-Hz screen with simple games. This is for example the case in Subway Surfers, where it reaches 119 fps on average. However, there are also the occasional drops in the frame rates that show that the smartphone already reaches its limits here at times.

Asphalt 9
Asphalt 9
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Motorola Moto G54; Asphalt 9: Legends; 4.3.0h: Ø29.9 (27-31)
Motorola Moto G54; PUBG Mobile; 2.8.0: Ø29.9 (28-31)
Motorola Moto G54; Subway Surfers; 3.19.0: Ø119.1 (89-121)

Emissions - Stereo sound with Dolby Atmos

Temperatures

GFXBench battery test: T-Rex scenario
GFXBench battery test: T-Rex scenario

During regular operation, the smartphone hardly heats up, only rarely becoming more than hand warm. But this changes under load. If you put some heavy demands on the Moto G54, the surface temperatures increase up to 45.4 °C (114 °F) in our test. Even though this temperature value gives no reason for concern, on some hot summer days, it could easily reach a few degrees higher, which wouldn't make holding the smartphone in the hand feel very comfortable anymore.

The internals of the Moto G54 stay cool enough, since the smartphone is always able to maintain its full SoC performance even under longer load in the test. It is incompatible with the 3DMark Wild Life, so alternatively we used the GFXBench battery test for our stress test.

Max. Load
 45.4 °C
114 F
38.9 °C
102 F
37 °C
99 F
 
 43.7 °C
111 F
38.9 °C
102 F
37.4 °C
99 F
 
 43.8 °C
111 F
39.9 °C
104 F
36.7 °C
98 F
 
Maximum: 45.4 °C = 114 F
Average: 40.2 °C = 104 F
37.5 °C
100 F
39.8 °C
104 F
42.9 °C
109 F
37.1 °C
99 F
40.3 °C
105 F
44.3 °C
112 F
36 °C
97 F
40.3 °C
105 F
42.7 °C
109 F
Maximum: 44.3 °C = 112 F
Average: 40.1 °C = 104 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.2 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto G54
Motorola Moto G54

Speakers

The Dolby Atmos compatible stereo speakers of the Moto G54 produce a fairly thin sound image due to their lack of bass. But the sound is still relatively balanced for a smartphone and doesn't distort even at maximum volume - although at 79.7 dB(A) that isn't very high anyways.

You can connect external audio devices with the smartphone using the 3.5-mm audio port or Bluetooth 5.3. In addition to the AAC, SBC, LC3, and LDAC Bluetooth audio codecs, the Moto G54 also supports all the current aptX codecs as well as LDHC v1 to v4.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.845.8253737.33131.728.44032.533.15036.4366328.9278024.420.510023.721.212524.129.716020.137.620013.640.225012.646.931512.75040011.254.350013.562.363014.766.38001466.4100013.672.1125012.670.316001169.6200010.867.2250011.567.9315013.865.740001567.8500015.667.4630016.265.8800017.263.11000017.866.51250017.160.71600017.857SPL26.779.7N0.845.5median 14median 65.7Delta2.49.435.938.526.230.929.430.528.731.836.640.52235.819.733.417.936.218.538.417.742.215.143.815.545.616.550.21354.813.459.514.262.81366.312.870.613.874.713.777.113.679.213.279.6148213.582.913.679.713.978.313.679.413.679.713.869.313.158.225.890.70.778.5median 13.7median 70.60.813.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G54Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G54 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Life - Moto G54 with a 5000-mAh battery

Power Consumption

The Motorola Moto G54 is charged using the included charger that offers up to 20 watts of power. However, the smartphone is only able to draw a maximum of 15 watts, making the charging process take a little longer. In our test, it takes 2:53 hours to completely recharge the empty 5000-mAh battery to 100%.

In terms of its power consumption, the Moto G54 is fairly efficient. Under load, it only consumes 3.3 watts on average, while the consumption levels out at 1.2 watts during idle operation. The competitors are unable to improve on either of this.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.2 / 1.5 Watt
Load midlight 3.3 / 5.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Moto G54
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G53
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 12
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
5000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7020
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-20%
-38%
-19%
-19%
0%
-28%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.8
11%
0.89
1%
1
-11%
0.99
-10%
0.9
-0%
0.894 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=157, last 2 years)
1%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.5
-25%
2.31
-93%
1.2
-0%
1.98
-65%
1.2
-0%
1.449 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=157, last 2 years)
-21%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
2
-33%
2.34
-56%
1.5
-0%
2.02
-35%
1.5
-0%
1.631 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=157, last 2 years)
-9%
Load Average *
3.3
4.6
-39%
4.11
-25%
4.2
-27%
3.35
-2%
3.3
-0%
5.47 ?(2.4 - 16.5, n=157, last 2 years)
-66%
Load Maximum *
5.6
6.3
-13%
6.46
-15%
8.9
-59%
4.72
16%
5.6
-0%
8.22 ?(4.32 - 20.8, n=157, last 2 years)
-47%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Motorola Moto G54 MediaTek Dimensity 7020; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.17 (0.953-5.56)
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.32 (0.822-6.28)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mediatek Helio G80; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.42 (1.21-7.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.22 (1.053-5.84)
Motorola Moto G54 MediaTek Dimensity 7020; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.041 (0.916-1.577)
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.068 (0.785-3.35)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mediatek Helio G80; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.33 (1.278-1.755)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.395 (1.314-1.468)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Motorola Moto G54 MediaTek Dimensity 7020; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.92 (3.3-5.11)
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.53 (2.08-4.36)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mediatek Helio G80; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.25 (3.04-4.71)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.83 (2.64-3.15)
Motorola Moto G54 MediaTek Dimensity 7020; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.041 (0.916-1.577)
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.068 (0.785-3.35)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mediatek Helio G80; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.33 (1.278-1.755)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.395 (1.314-1.468)

Battery Life

The Motorola Moto G54 achieves a solid battery life in our test. Around 14.5 hours with simulated web surfing and almost 17.5 hours when playing a video in a constant loop are acceptable runtimes, even though they are still slightly less overall than what the competitors are able to manage.

Since we ran our battery tests with an activated 120-Hz display, you might still get slightly longer runtimes if you switch to 60 Hz. But in any case, the Moto G54 should bring a sufficient amount of power to last through a whole day of intensive use. And if you use the smartphone only sporadically, two days or more should also be possible.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
58h 01min
WiFi Websurfing
14h 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 21min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 01min
Motorola Moto G54
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G53
5000 mAh
Nokia G22
5050 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 12
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-1%
20%
-12%
-9%
-12%
Reader / Idle
3481
2301
-34%
1170
-66%
1425
-59%
1668
-52%
H.264
1041
1165
12%
1044
0%
1086
4%
1065
2%
WiFi v1.3
875
1035
18%
1052
20%
896
2%
803
-8%
645
-26%
Load
301
297
-1%
348
16%
382
27%
388
29%

Pros

+ IPS display with 120 Hz
+ good system performance
+ 5G with eSIM
+ slim OS
+ good 50 MP camera
+ solid battery life

Cons

- only WiFi 5
- not very bright display
- slow charging

Verdict on the Motorola Moto G54

Testing the Motorola Moto G54. Test unit provided by Motorola Germany.
Testing the Motorola Moto G54. Test unit provided by Motorola Germany.

The Motorola Moto G54 offers a lot of value for its moderate sales price of 200 Euros (~$211). The entry-level smartphone scores with a solid IPS display with 120 Hz, combining this with a good system performance resulting from 8 GB of RAM and the