Notebookcheck Logo

Caterpillar CAT S75 review - Outdoor smartphone with satellite communication and underwater camera

Modernity meets past times. The Cat S75 is a true rugged outdoor phone with high IP certification and military protection standards. However, the highlight of the Cat smartphone is the communication with geostationary satellites, which is supposed to offer advantages over Apple's satellite emergency call.
Test CAT S75 smartphone

The Cat S75, which is available at an MSRP of 599 Euros, is the most reliable Cat smartphone ever, according to the manufacturer. The outdoor phone's casing is certified according to IP68 as well as IP69K standards and also withstands extreme temperatures, humidity, and vibrations.

The Cat S75 has a 6.6-inch, 120 Hz IPS display and a triple camera setup with underwater mode. The rugged phone is powered by a MediaTek Dimensity 930, which has 6 GB of RAM and 128 GB of flash storage. The special feature of the latest Cat offspring is the Bullitt Satellite Connect function, which enables communication with geostationary satellites.

CAT S75 (S Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 930 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
Display
6.58 inch 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, IPS LCD, gorilla glass Victus, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 93 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD slot (up to 128GB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass,, FM radio, miracast, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, Sattelite: 23/255/256; 5G: N1/N2/N3/N5/N7/N8/N20/N28/N38/N40/ N41/N75/N77/N78; 4G: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/32/38/39/40/41; 3G: 1/2/4/5/8; 2G: 2/3/5/8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 11.9 x 171 x 80 ( = 0.47 x 6.73 x 3.15 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/​1.8, Videos @1080p/​30fps) + 8 MP (f/​2.2, wide angle lens) + 2 MP (f/​2.4, macro lens)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/​2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, charger, USB cable, car adapter, info material, Cat UI, 24 Months Warranty, widevine L1, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
Weight
268 g ( = 9.45 oz / 0.59 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
79.7 %
05/2023
CAT S75
Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256
268 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.58"2408x1080
78.3 %
04/2023
CAT S53
SD 480, Adreno 619
320 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
82.6 %
12/2022
Gigaset GX6
Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4
278 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2412x1080
81.9 %
08/2022
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
235 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080

Case - Outdoor smartphone with notch

The Cat S75 is only available in one color.
The Cat S75 is only available in one color.

The focus of the Cat S75, which is drop-proof up to 1.8 meters, is on high stability and resistance, but the display-to-surface ratio suffers at only 76.7%. The rugged smartphone from Caterpillar is certified according to IP-68/69K and the MIL-STD-810H - you can read about the military standard and its drawbacks here.

The workmanship of the Cat S75 is on a good level, but the outdoor phone does not really feel high-quality. However, according to the manufacturer, the plastic casing can be cleaned with scrub brushes and disinfecting wipes and also contains antimicrobial silver ions. The IP69K certification even protects the Cat S75 from hot water during high-pressure cleaning from a short distance.

Test CAT S75 smartphone
Test CAT S75 smartphone
Test CAT S75 smartphone
Test CAT S75 smartphone
Test CAT S75 smartphone

Size comparison

171 mm / 6.73 in 81 mm / 3.19 in 16 mm / 0.63 in 320 g0.705 lbs171 mm / 6.73 in 80 mm / 3.15 in 11.9 mm / 0.4685 in 268 g0.591 lbs170.7 mm / 6.72 in 82.2 mm / 3.24 in 11.9 mm / 0.4685 in 278 g0.613 lbs168.8 mm / 6.65 in 79.9 mm / 3.15 in 9.9 mm / 0.3898 in 235 g0.518 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Equipment - CAT S75 with satellite telephone

The outdoor phone's features include Miracast, a status LED, Bluetooth 5.1, and NFC. Peripheral devices can also be connected via the USB-C port using an OTG adapter. The USB interface uses the slow 2.0 standard for data transfer.

The Cat S75 is only available in a version with 6 GB of RAM and 128 GB of internal UFS storage. Those who need more storage can resort to expansion via microSD cards.

microSD card reader

The integrated microSD slot supports the current SDHC and SDXC standards, but the memory can only be increased by 128 GB. The outdoor phone's performance in the Cross Platform Disk Test is quite convincing in combination with our reference card Angelbird AV PRO V60. However, the Cat S75 is slow with a copy speed of less than 20 MB/s.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
37.8 MB/s +96%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
30.6 MB/s +59%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
27.9 MB/s +45%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
19.3 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
CAT S75 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.6 (23.7-44.1)
Gigaset GX6 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø41.8 (28.1-52.6)
CAT S75 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.9 (53.3-85.6)
Gigaset GX6 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø73.5 (53.1-77.5)

Software - Outdoor smartphone with Android 12

The Cat smartphone is shipped with Google's operating system Android 12. The manufacturer advertises five years of update support for its rugged phone, but only two major Android updates are planned. Accordingly, the supply will end with the next Android generation 14.

Security updates are available for three years, but only critical security gaps will be fixed for another two years. At the time of the test, the Cat S75 had outdated security patches from February 2023.

Test CAT S75 smartphone
Test CAT S75 smartphone
Test CAT S75 smartphone
Test CAT S75 smartphone
Test CAT S75 smartphone

Communications and GNSS - CAT S75 with 5G

The rugged phone from Caterpillar enables satellite communication (NTN) via Bullitt Satellite Messenger in addition to the obligatory 4G and 5G support of a premium phone. This satellite service, but without text messaging, can be used for free for twelve months after purchasing the Cat smartphone. After that, a subscription has to be taken out, which costs up to 60 Euros per month.

Instead of relying on a proprietary satellite network, as with an Apple iPhone 14 Pro, the Cat S75 communicates via conventional 3GPP NTN signals thanks to a MediaTek chip, so satellites from different providers can be used depending on which satellite enables the best connection quality. Thus, users should always be able to send and receive text messages and make emergency calls, even when no mobile network is available.

The outdoor phone only offers Wi-Fi 5 within the home Wi-Fi network, which is only sufficient for average transfer rates of less than 400 Mbps in combination with our reference router Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=198, last 2 years)
668 MBit/s +94%
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
614 (544min - 640max) MBit/s +78%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
345 (331min - 351max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=199, last 2 years)
698 MBit/s +88%
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
682 (353min - 727max) MBit/s +83%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
372 (353min - 388max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1894, n=61, last 2 years)
1529 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
944 (866min - 952max) MBit/s
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
892 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (598 - 1844, n=61, last 2 years)
1364 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
910 (677min - 949max) MBit/s
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
743 MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø944 (866-952)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø910 (677-949)
CAT S75 MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø345 (331-351)
CAT S75 MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø372 (353-388)
Test GPS outdoors
Test GPS outdoors
Test GPS indoors
Test GPS indoors

The Cat S75 uses the satellite networks GPS, BeiDou, Galileo, and Glonass in dual-band as well as SBAS for positioning. The phone offers good accuracy outdoors. We also check the positioning accuracy on a bike tour and compare the results with Garmin's Venu 2 smartwatch. The Cat S75's route is very close to that of the reference device.

Test GPS Cat S75
Test GPS Cat S75
Test GPS Garmin Venu 2
Test GPS Garmin Venu 2

Telephony and Voice Quality - Rugged Phone with Dual-SIM

Test CAT S75 smartphone
Test CAT S75 smartphone

The call quality with the Cat S75 via the mobile network, including VoLTE and Wi-Fi calling, is good and the built-in microphone transmits voices loudly and clearly. Video calls via the installed front-facing camera also worked without problems in the test. The outdoor phone supports dual SIM, but one card slot is occupied when using the satellite service.

Camera - CAT S75 with 50 MP

The Cat S75 makes beautiful seflies in daylight.
The Cat S75 makes beautiful seflies in daylight.

The rear-facing main camera has an open aperture of f/1.8. The 50 MP image sensor offers solid photo quality, at least in bright light conditions. However, both the sharpness and the image details are not really convincing considering the price range. The rear-facing camera unit also only cuts a moderately good figure in low-light conditions. The blurriness increases visibly with less light - the same applies to the low-resolution ultra-wide-angle lens in daylight.

However, the highlight of the Cat S75 is that the dual-camera unit is waterproof and can even withstand water pressure at a depth of up to five meters without damage, according to the manufacturer. The outdoor phone also has the appropriate underwater mode on board.

Wide angle
Wide angle
Main camera
Main camera
3x zoom
3x zoom
5x zoom (max)
5x zoom (max)
Macro
Macro
Test CAT S75 smartphone
Test CAT S75 smartphone
Test CAT S75 smartphone
Test CAT S75 smartphone

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow LightWide-angle
click to load images
ColorChecker
8.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
7 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7 ∆E
ColorChecker CAT S75: 6.45 ∆E min: 1.98 - max: 10.79 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
51.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
45.8 ∆E
58.1 ∆E
49.4 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
61.2 ∆E
60.7 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
71.9 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
72.2 ∆E
67.7 ∆E
50.2 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
24 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
ColorChecker CAT S75: 44.8 ∆E min: 13.76 - max: 72.23 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Outdoor cell phone without power adapter

Our Cat S75 comes with neither a charger nor a car adapter in the scope of delivery. Furthermore, there is no protective film on the display ex-works. The box only contains a USB cable and information material.

The manufacturer grants a 24-month warranty on its smartphone which is valid worldwide where the CAT service is available. A customer and help service in case of emergency (Crisis Response Center) is also available 365 days a year in over 200 languages via the Bullitt Satellite Messenger.

Input & operation - Rugged phone with fingerprint sensor

The Cat S75 offers two programmable keys that can be used for push-to-talk and emergency calls. The outdoor phone has a capacitive touchscreen with convincing gliding properties. There is also nothing to complain about in terms of precision, so our inputs with the fingers are accurately implemented.

The fingerprint sensor integrated on the back unlocks the rugged phone reliably. The period until the display turns on from standby mode is also short enough. The FaceUnlock function via the front-facing camera (2D) is also offered and recognizes the user quite quickly in good lighting conditions.

Test CAT S75 smartphone
Test CAT S75 smartphone
Test CAT S75 smartphone

Display - Outdoor phone with IPS

Subpixel structure
Subpixel structure

The Cat S75 is equipped with a 6.58-inch IPS display that has an unusual resolution of 2,408 x 1080 pixels. The achieved pixel density is slightly above the 400 ppi mark. The Cat smartphone does not use pulse width modulation (PWM) for brightness control.

The rugged smartphone can only convince to a limited extent in terms of luminance. We measured a maximum of 580 cd/m² on a pure white background - a good rate in view of the competition, but still quite low for a phone designed for outdoor use. Even inexpensive mid-range phones with AMOLED screens, such as a Redmi Note 12, shine much brighter. In the more realistic APL18 measurement with dark areas, it is almost identical at 602 cd/m².

480
cd/m²
508
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
511
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
580
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 580 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 529.2 cd/m² Minimum: 10.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 566 cd/m²
Contrast: 1204:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.02 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.99
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.248
CAT S75
IPS LCD, 2408x1080, 6.58
CAT S53
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Gigaset GX6
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
-0%
18%
-30%
43%
Brightness middle
566
476
-16%
505
-11%
510
-10%
650
15%
Brightness
529
504
-5%
491
-7%
495
-6%
658
24%
Brightness Distribution
83
82
-1%
93
12%
92
11%
97
17%
Black Level *
0.47
0.6
-28%
0.3
36%
0.46
2%
Contrast
1204
793
-34%
1683
40%
1109
-8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.02
3.18
37%
4.32
14%
7.41
-48%
1.55
69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.6
5.86
39%
7.22
25%
13.26
-38%
2.59
73%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.4
4.2
5%
3
32%
10.6
-141%
1.8
59%
Gamma
2.248 98%
2.268 97%
2.268 97%
2.518 87%
2.194 100%
CCT
7173 91%
7234 90%
7098 92%
10050 65%
6316 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17682 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The IPS panel of the Cat S75 achieves a solid black value of 0.47 cd/m² in our display measurements. The contrast ratio of over 1000:1 is still satisfactory.

The display analysis is performed with the help of a photospectrometer and the Calman software. The deviations in the color (5.0) and grayscale (4.4) reproduction are to be rated as high and differences to the reference colors are clearly visible.

Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB)
Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB)
Color ram (target color space: sRGB)
Color ram (target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
15.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 5.5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.9 ms rise
↘ 18.9 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.5 ms).

The outdoor phone leaves a solid impression outdoors, but display content is hardly visible in direct sunlight. The colors of the IPS panel are stable at flat viewing angles, but the display looks a bit faded.

Test CAT S75 smartphone
Test CAT S75 smartphone
Test CAT S75 smartphone
Test CAT S75 smartphone
Test CAT S75 smartphone

Performance - CAT S75 with Mediatek SoC

Inside the Cat S75 works a MediaTek Dimensity 930, including an Imagination IMG BXM-8-256 as the graphics unit. The system speed is sufficient in everyday use, but small lags are still there.

The performance of the Dimensity 930 is below that of a Snapdragon 778G in the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, especially in the multi-score of Geekbench, where the MediaTek SoC scores weakly for this price range. The same applies to the graphics unit released in 2014. The IMG BXM-8-256 cannot even begin to keep up with a mid-range GPU from Qualcomm - an Adreno 642L delivers almost twice as high rates as the Cat S75 in GFXBench.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=201, last 2 years)
921 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
773 Points +21%
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
693 Points +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (641 - 698, n=2)
670 Points +5%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
641 Points
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
510 Points -20%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=201, last 2 years)
3055 Points +71%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2802 Points +57%
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2095 Points +17%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (1787 - 1909, n=2)
1848 Points +3%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
1787 Points
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1642 Points -8%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2531, n=44, last 2 years)
1279 Points +54%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (832 - 916, n=2)
874 Points +5%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
832 Points
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
684 Points -18%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 6460, n=44, last 2 years)
3412 Points +71%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (1998 - 2306, n=2)
2152 Points +8%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
1998 Points
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1787 Points -11%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=138, last 2 years)
770978 Points +96%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
505982 Points +28%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (394141 - 430895, n=2)
412518 Points +5%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
394141 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
12444 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
12113 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 21385, n=200, last 2 years)
11973 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  ()
11787 Points
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=158, last 2 years)
855 Points +41%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (606 - 612, n=2)
609 Points 0%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
606 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=155, last 2 years)
5988 Points +70%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4079 Points +16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (3527 - 3771, n=2)
3649 Points +3%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
3527 Points
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=155, last 2 years)
9905 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
8858 Points +34%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (6635 - 6979, n=2)
6807 Points +3%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
6635 Points
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=155, last 2 years)
6501 Points +49%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (4352 - 4955, n=2)
4654 Points +7%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
4352 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
3988 Points -8%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=155, last 2 years)
15209 Points +254%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6594 Points +53%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
4298 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (4011 - 4298, n=2)
4155 Points -3%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=155, last 2 years)
1531 Points +20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (1276 - 1457, n=2)
1367 Points +7%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
1276 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
1188 Points -7%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=144, last 2 years)
21312 Points +323%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (5039 - 5507, n=2)
5273 Points +5%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
5039 Points
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=112, last 2 years)
17146 Points +1699%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
953 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (877 - 953, n=2)
915 Points -4%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3068 Points +3%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2986 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4050 Points +47%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2754 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3781 Points +36%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2778 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
108 fps +69%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
60 fps -6%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps -6%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
132 fps +81%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
102 fps +40%
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
82 fps +12%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
73 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps +31%
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
58 fps +12%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
54 fps +4%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
77 fps +26%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
64 fps +5%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
61 fps
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
42 fps -31%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
54 fps +200%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
48 fps +167%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
37 fps +106%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps +100%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
42 fps +50%
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps +4%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps +81%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps +75%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
21 fps +31%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +94%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
25 fps +47%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps -6%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +90%
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps +90%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps +60%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +97%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11 fps +67%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.6 fps
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6.5 fps -2%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
31 fps +82%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +76%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
24 fps +41%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +70%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
28 fps +40%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
18 fps -10%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps +127%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4.4 fps +69%
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2.9 fps +12%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.6 fps
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=162, last 2 years)
111.1 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)
72.887 Points +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (64.7 - 77.1, n=2)
70.9 Points +10%
CAT S75 (Chrome 114)
64.737 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=146, last 2 years)
116.1 runs/min +163%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chome 104)
53.8 runs/min +22%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (44.1 - 58.4, n=2)
51.3 runs/min +16%
CAT S75 (Chrome 114)
44.1 runs/min
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 212, n=154, last 2 years)
103.1 Points +49%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (69 - 86, n=2)
77.5 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)
74 Points +7%
CAT S75 (Chrome 114)
69 Points
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=106, last 2 years)
140 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)
104 Points +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (93 - 110, n=2)
101.5 Points +9%
CAT S75 (Chromee 114)
93 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=207, last 2 years)
33914 Points +67%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)
25445 Points +25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (20342 - 26766, n=2)
23554 Points +16%
Gigaset GX6 (Chrome 107)
21753 Points +7%
CAT S75 (Chrome 114)
20342 Points
CAT S53 (Chrome 112)
18774 Points -8%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
CAT S75 (Chrome 114)
1985.5 ms *
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (1466 - 1986, n=2)
1726 ms * +13%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)
1708.8 ms * +14%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=162, last 2 years)
1517 ms * +24%

* ... smaller is better

CAT S75CAT S53Gigaset GX6Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-50%
-37%
-24%
-27%
31%
Sequential Read 256KB
991.21
510.9
-48%
953.5
-4%
841.6
-15%
Sequential Write 256KB
878.23
208.2
-76%
454.7
-48%
484.7
-45%
Random Read 4KB
221.56
140.7
-36%
194.9
-12%
170.6
-23%
188.1 ?(89.3 - 297, n=64)
-15%
Random Write 4KB
233.91
141.4
-40%
39.9
-83%
204.2
-13%
181.1 ?(62.6 - 419, n=64)
-23%

Games - Cat S75 manages 120 fps

We check the Cat S75's graphics performance using the GameBench app and three Android games from the Play Store. Our first test game, PUBG Mobile, can only be played at medium details (HD) - a UHD setting is not selectable. The shooter is rendered at 30 fps, and 40 fps is possible in the lowest detail settings.

Less demanding games, like Dead Trigger 2, run close to the native frame rate at 120 fps. However, the arena shooter Armajet reveals larger fluctuations and severe frame rate drops below 30 fps.

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
CAT S75; Armajet: Ø82.3 (24-120)
CAT S75; Dead Trigger 2: Ø115.8 (101-120)
CAT S75; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø29.4 (22-31)
CAT S75; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.5 (34-41)

Emissions - Outdoor phone stays cool

Temperature

The case of the Cat S75 barely warms up in our Stability Test scenario - we only measure 37.2 °C at the back in the peak. The stress tests of 3DMark are not supported by the MediaTek SoC so we cannot provide them for the outdoor phone.

Max. Load
 37.9 °C
100 F
35.3 °C
96 F
32.2 °C
90 F
 
 38 °C
100 F
33.4 °C
92 F
32.2 °C
90 F
 
 37.6 °C
100 F
34.1 °C
93 F
31.8 °C
89 F
 
Maximum: 38 °C = 100 F
Average: 34.7 °C = 94 F
32 °C
90 F
34.7 °C
94 F
36.8 °C
98 F
32.4 °C
90 F
35.5 °C
96 F
37.2 °C
99 F
32 °C
90 F
33.8 °C
93 F
37 °C
99 F
Maximum: 37.2 °C = 99 F
Average: 34.6 °C = 94 F
Power Supply (max.)  43.6 °C = 110 F | Room Temperature 19.8 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.7 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Speaker

The rugged phone from Caterpillar relies on two speakers with a solid volume of over 85 dB. Our measurements show a fairly linear frequency response for the Cat S75's mids and highs. However, lows are not present in the sound picture. A wired or wireless headphone solution via USB-C port and Bluetooth 5.1 is also available.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.432.62528.228.73126.623.84026.624.75032.430.96322.522.7801722.110025.529.112521.23716019.140.22001544.525014.748.831513.755.640011.36250014.760.663016.266.880016.571100014.375.5125012.175.8160011.672.6200011.174.1250013.672.9315021.474.1400024.870.650002873.8630023.467.3800023.168.11000020.865.71250023.470.7160002260.3SPL33.584.5N1.558.7median 16.5median 67.3Delta4.49.639.441.139.143.531.537.629.832.433.438.126.630.922.320.720.52415.627.514.733.711.437.21043.28.848.6953.610.558.312.262.514.366.411.670.11271.410.271.210.465.111.165.812.769.614.466.214.268.214.769.515.668.816.567.816.558.417.348.325.480.20.646.6median 12.7median 65.12.610.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseCAT S75Gigaset GX6
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
CAT S75 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gigaset GX6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery life - Cat S75 with wireless charging

Power consumption

The Cat S75's battery holds 5,000 mAh and can optionally be charged via USB-C or wirelessly - both with up to 15 watts. The power consumption is inconspicuous for the outdoor phone.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.1 / 1.5 / 1.9 Watt
Load midlight 3.2 / 5.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
CAT S75
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
4050 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-15%
-7%
-21%
Idle Minimum *
1.1
0.9
18%
0.9 ?(0.7 - 1.1, n=2)
18%
Idle Average *
1.5
1.4
7%
1.35 ?(1.2 - 1.5, n=2)
10%
Idle Maximum *
1.9
1.8
5%
1.85 ?(1.8 - 1.9, n=2)
3%
Load Average *
3.2
4.7
-47%
Load Maximum *
5.2
8.1
-56%
7.45 ?(5.2 - 9.7, n=2)
-43%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
CAT S75 MediaTek Dimensity 930; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.39 (1.13-5.16)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.72 (2.8-9.91)
CAT S75 MediaTek Dimensity 930; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.696 (1.536-1.941)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.385 (1.097-2.05)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
CAT S75 MediaTek Dimensity 930; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.59 (2.23-4)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.65 (5.06-7.73)
CAT S75 MediaTek Dimensity 930; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.696 (1.536-1.941)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.385 (1.097-2.05)

Battery life

In our WLAN test with an adjusted display brightness of 150 cd/m2, the Cat S75 lasted about 15 hours, which should get even heavy users through the day without problems during outdoor use.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
14h 56min
CAT S75
5000 mAh
CAT S53
5500 mAh
Gigaset GX6
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
4050 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
896
1135
27%
1002
12%
768
-14%

Pros

+ high standard of protection
+ satellite communication
+ long runtimes
+ robust housing
+ programmable special keys

Cons

- wide display borders
- moderate display brightness
- old Android 12 + only two upgrades planned
- lame SoC for the price range

Verdict

In review: Cat S75. Test device provided by cyberport.de
In review: Cat S75. Test device provided by cyberport.de

The Cat S75 is a robust smartphone that stands out from the competition with its satellite communication support. The possibility to use a satellite service via the installed MediaTek chip using the open 3GPP-NTN standard is priced at just under 600 Euros (~$600), but the paid monthly subscription is required for the full range of features.

However, those interested in the outdoor phone from Caterpillar should be aware that this feature and the high level of durability must enjoy a high personal priority because in many areas the Cat S75 operates on the technical level of a cheap mid-range cell phone (the display and the optics are even worse).

For those who move away from civilization, a Cat S75 is an interesting piece of technology despite its hardware shortcomings.

If you are looking for a robust cell phone for the construction site or a trip to the wilderness but are not interested in satellite support, you will find a good solution with the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro or Gigaset GX6 - durable alternatives with a somewhat more modern design and exchangeable battery.

Price and availability

The Cat S75 is available at a price of 599 Euros, among others at Cyberport or Amazon. Buyers get three months of free access to the satellite feature for up to 30 messages per month.

CAT S75 - 05/11/2023 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
71 / 75 → 95%
Pointing Device
90%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 69%
Weight
87%
Battery
91%
Display
83%
Games Performance
26 / 64 → 40%
Application Performance
77 / 86 → 89%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
58%
Average
75%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Read all 2 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Caterpillar CAT S75 review - Outdoor smartphone with satellite communication and underwater camera
Marcus Herbrich, 2023-05-15 (Update: 2023-05-15)