Honor 400 Lite
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 16 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 29 scores (from 56 reviews)
Reviews for the Honor 400 Lite
Source: Stuff TV

If more devices like the Honor 400 Lite came our way at this price tag (or less), we'd probably find ourselves inventing things to complain about to keep the snarky Stuff soul alive. Being one of the few exceptions to the mid-range smartphone rule, the 400 Lite backs it all up with a generous AMOLED display and overachieving battery that'll more than make up for the underperforming innards and camera.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/07/2025
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Expert Reviews

I’m not a fan of Honor doubling down on the Apple cosplay. It feels like a lack of confidence in the product, which is madness because, as far as budget phones go, the Honor 400 Lite is one of the best. Performance and battery life are better than last year, the main camera is still a decent shooter, its IP65 rating means it’s more robust and that new 120Hz display makes everything feel lovely and smooth in use. Plus, of course, the software support is fantastic. I could have done without the superfluous camera button and the backup cameras aren’t up to the same standard as the main one, but otherwise, it’s extremely well-rounded. For £250, it’s a good amount of phone, and delivers the kind of value for money Apple fans can only dream of. It would, however, be nice to see Honor move away from imitation and commit to establishing its own identity with the next generation.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/21/2025
Source: Techradar

Overall, the Honor 400 Lite is a compelling midrange smartphone that balances innovative AI features with quick access camera features via the AI Button. While it makes a few compromises, particularly with its processor, battery and charging speed, the unique AI Button, comprehensive AI editing suite, and advanced recording capabilities truly set it apart. The trade-offs between the 400 Lite and the more robust X9c highlight Honor's strategic decision to prioritise cutting-edge software and user convenience in this model. For users who value a feature-rich camera experience and smart AI integrations in a manageable form factor, the Honor 400 Lite presents a strong case, offering substantial value for its price. It can be found online starting at R7 500.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/15/2025
Source: Expert Reviews

I’m not a fan of Honor doubling down on the Apple cosplay. It feels like a lack of confidence in the product, which is madness because, as far as budget phones go, the Honor 400 Lite is one of the best. Performance and battery life are better than last year, the main camera is still a decent shooter, its IP65 rating means it’s more robust and that new 120Hz display makes everything feel lovely and smooth in use. Plus, of course, the software support is fantastic. I could have done without the superfluous camera button and the backup cameras aren’t up to the same standard as the main one, but otherwise, it’s extremely well-rounded. For £250, it’s a good amount of phone, and delivers the kind of value for money Apple fans can only dream of. It would, however, be nice to see Honor move away from imitation and commit to establishing its own identity with the next generation.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/11/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Creative Bloq

The Honor 400 Lite found itself on the cusp of something interesting, where in so blindly copying the design of another, it has somehow found itself travelling around the curve and back again at originality. Perhaps it is due to so many smartphones being designed to feel good and look good, but not necessarily to remain comfortable to use after hours of use. The 400 Lite is, well, light and causes no strain, and as such is a small revelation. On top of that, with a good display, decent performance and strong battery life, it certainly has more than a few arrows to its quiver; however, it is not without weaknesses. The camera, for all of its megapixels, does nothing to impress.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/30/2025
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal

The Honor 400 Lite tries to emulate the iPhone’s premium look at a budget-friendly price of NPR 40,000, and it succeeds in design and display quality. The lightweight build, AMOLED panel, and long-term software support are strong points. However, its average performance, underwhelming cameras, and lackluster video capabilities hold it back. The absence of stereo speakers, Gorilla Glass, and robust haptics further dampens its appeal. At this price, alternatives like the CMF Phone 2 Pro (review) or Redmi Note 14 Pro (review) may offer better performance and camera experience. If you’re drawn to its iPhone-like design and don’t prioritize heavy gaming or photography, the Honor 400 Lite is a decent choice, but it doesn’t fully justify its NPR 40,000 price tag.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/09/2025
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 80% performance: 75% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 85%
Source: Irish Mirror

Honor 400 Lite does a great job of delivering premium iPhone-style features on a budget-priced phone. In 2025, this is a competitive price point with options from Nothing and Samsung offering plenty of alternatives. But anyone who buys this Honor unit should be pleased by the value-for-money feature set.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/02/2025
Source: Canbuyornot

At S$339, the Honor 400 Lite is competitively priced. The Vivo V50 Lite, which is quite similar, but has a larger battery, is S$499. While you get several iPhone-like features, and an iPhone-inspired design, the Honor is a budget mainstream model that's not as capable as Apple's. While I wasn't a fan of the cameras, they can do the job, and the overall experience of using the Honor is good. The general performance, especially, is fine, and the screen is nice. It's pretty good value for the price. It's available now from Lazada and Shopee.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/07/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Cool Smartphone

Honor looks like they have set the tone for another series with the 400 Lite, and it is for the most part, a very good base from which to build future devices, as they did with the 200 series last year. Yes there are a few compromises that have been made to get the price to where they needed it to be and these may be deal breakers but for a lot of people, they won’t. I know that if I were looking for a second phone (for work use maybe) or a phone for my family members, then this would defiantly be one on my radar. When looking at competition then you are going to be looking at the likes of the OnePlus Nord CE4 Lite 5G (£199), OnePlus Nord 4 (£399) Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (£249).
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/07/2025
Source: Amateur Photographer

Most can’t justify spending a fortune on an iPhone, but still want the looks and camera handling of one. And that’s where the 400 Lite comes in. You obviously don’t get multiple high-resolution sensors or the speed or image quality of a flagship iPhone. But the Honor’s main camera performs well in most scenarios, sufficient for a beginner taking casual photos. On the whole, the Honor 400 Lite looks good, has a bright screen and a snappy camera button and most importantly, doesn’t break the bank.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/30/2025
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Expert Reviews

Im not a fan of Honor doubling down on the Apple cosplay. It feels like a lack of confidence in the product, which is madness because, as far as budget phones go, the Honor 400 Lite is one of the best. Performance and battery life are better than last year, the main camera is still a decent shooter, its IP65 rating means its more robust and that new 120Hz display makes everything feel lovely and smooth in use. Plus, of course, the software support is fantastic. I could have done without the superfluous camera button and the backup cameras arent up to the same standard as the main one, but otherwise, its extremely well-rounded. For £250, its a good amount of phone, and delivers the kind of value for money Apple fans can only dream of. It would, however, be nice to see Honor move away from imitation and commit to establishing its own identity with the next generation.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar

The Honor 400 Lite is a fascinating budget Android phone that seems way more enamored with the Apple way of doing things. Its similarity to the iPhone results in a solid handset with some appealing features, including a dedicated camera button and a handy notch widget system. However, the Honor 400 Lite takes its eye off the ball in some key areas, including performance and camera quality.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2025
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Cool Smartphone

Having used the Honour 400 Lite for a few days now, I can say that it falls firmly into the lower end of the current smartphone market. This is perfectly acceptable, as it aligns with the intended market. However, there are a couple of shortcomings that I’ve noticed. The most significant ones are the single loudspeaker setup and the lack of wireless charging. While these features are not uncommon in high-end or high-priced devices, they are still a downside for this phone. The performance can also be a bit slow at times. However, this may be due to the fact that the phone is currently running on pre-release software, as it is not officially launching until the end of the month. Despite these minor flaws, if you’re looking for a low-cost entry-level smartphone with good battery life and reasonable charging speeds, then the Honour 400 Lite might be worth considering. I’ll provide a more detailed review in the future, after I’ve had a chance to use the phone for a bit longer.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2025
Source: Stuff TV

If the Honor 400 Lite looked any different, it’d be lost in the shuffle. As affordable phones go it’s an alright performer, takes a decent enough photo, and can go all day on a charge – but the same can be said for most of its rivals. The top contenders also excel in one or more areas. The Poco X7 Pro lasts even longer and has more power; the Nothing Phone 3a has unique looks and streamlined software; the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion is way tougher. Honor’s own Magic 7 Lite remains the longevity champ, and you won’t mistake it for an iPhone. But maybe that’s exactly what you want? None of the cheap competition do such a convincing impression of a premium handset. If you don’t mind paying for that design, you’ll be happy enough with what the 400 Lite offers for the cash. A very affordable all-rounder that’s rather shameless in its iPhone inspirations. The Honor 400 Lite appeals to those who like the Apple look, but budget rivals arguably have more unique personalities.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/25/2025
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Tech Spurt

Reviewing the Honor 400 Lite, a budget Android smartphone which beats the iPhone 16 Pro phones for AI smarts and in many other departments! You've even got a more customisable camera button. So is the Honor 400 Lite one of the best affordable Androids in 2025? I've been testing it as my full-time mobile these past few days, and besides the quite basic performance, it's been a decent everyday experience. The DImensity chipset is fine for gaming on Call of Duty, PubG etc, but more intensive titles like Wuthering Waves struggle.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/11/2025
Foreign Reviews
Source: Smartzone

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/24/2025
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 80% display: 95% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: Xataka

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/07/2025
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 68% display: 70% mobility: 75% workmanship: 65%
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/05/2025
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Hipertextual

Positive: Affordable price; beautiful design; impressive display; long battery life. Negative: Poor ultra-wide angle camera; average gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/05/2025
Source: Smart World

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/16/2025
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 70% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Multiplayer IT

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/15/2025
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/15/2025
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/14/2025
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 70% display: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 85%
Source: Batista70Phone

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/12/2025
Rating: Total score: 82% features: 80% display: 85% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/11/2025
Rating: price: 49% features: 73%
Source: Androidiani

Positive: Attractive price; great display; impressive cameras; beautiful design. Negative: Average battery life; mediocre gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/18/2025
Source: Mister Gadget

Positive: Good price; great AMOLED display; excellent autonomy; nice main camera. Negative: Mediocre design; poor ultra-wide angle camera; weak Wi-Fi.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/14/2025
Source: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade

Positive: Excellent main camera; bright AMOLED display; great autonomy; stylish design; light weight; smart AI Features. Negative: Mediocre ultra-wide angle camera; unsupported wireless charging; average gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/11/2025
Source: Ceotech

Positive: Elegant design; slim size; light weight; decent hardware; nice performance; smart AI Features; large battery capacity; good price. Negative: Poor video recording; mediocre secondary camera.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/11/2025
Source: Charles Tech

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/14/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 70% features: 90% mobility: 90%
Source: Journal du Geek

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/16/2025
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2025
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Clubic

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/09/2025
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 40% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Les Mobiles

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/09/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Les Numeriques

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2025
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: 01Net

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/06/2025
Rating: Total score: 52% price: 60% mobility: 20%
Source: Presse Citron

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2025
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 50% performance: 50% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: ITHardware.pl

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/20/2025
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Mobileworld 24

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/24/2025
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 70% performance: 66% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Telepolis

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/12/2025
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Root Nation PL

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/07/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: GSM Online PL

Positive: Bright AMOLED display; beautiful design; slim size; light weight; large battery capacity; nice main camera; good connectivity. Negative: Average performance; mono speakers; waterproof IP64 only.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/03/2025
Source: Techno Senior

Positive: Excellent cameras; stylish design; light weight; slim size; decent autonomy; quick charging; smart AI Features; affordable price. Negative: Average gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/29/2025
Source: Co Nowego

Positive: Elegant design; slim size; light weight; good price; smooth performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/07/2025
Source: Helpix

Positive: Premium design; great built quality; nice display. Negative: Weak hardware; relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/30/2025
Source: Yamobi

Positive: Premium design; great built quality; large screen; decent cameras; NFC module. Negative: Weak processor; slow memory; no memory card slot; average gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/19/2025
Source: Hi-Tech Mail

Positive: Beautiful design; slim size; light weight; great AMOLED display; smart AI Features. Negative: Mediocre cameras; average performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/28/2025
Source: Mega Obzor

Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; beautiful AMOLED 120Hz display; decent performance; good cooling system. Negative: Unsupported wireless charging; lack of headphone jack; non-microSD card slot.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/28/2025
Source: 3DNews.ru

Positive: Beautiful AMOLED 120Hz display; slim size; light weight; smart AI Features. Negative: Without headphone jack; no mini-jack; average gaming performance; mono speakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/27/2025
Source: MobilArena HU

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/11/2025
Rating: price: 80% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Vat Vo Studio

Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 07/10/2025
Source: Viettelstore

Positive: Modern design; sharp display; nice AI cameras; decent performance; good battery life; quick 35W charging.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/21/2025
Source: Viettelstore

Positive: Modern design; beautiful 120Hz display; smooth performance; great cameras; decent autonomy.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 07/16/2025
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Impressive design; solid workmanship; affordable price; bright AMOLED display; nice cameras; large battery capacity. Negative: Average performance.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 07/16/2025
Source: Viettelstore

Positive: Elegant design; sharp display; high performance; long battery life; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/01/2025
Source: VNReview

Positive: Excellent cameras; smart AI Features; impressive performance; powerful hardware; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 06/26/2025
Comment
Imagination IMG BXM-8-256: Single core variant of the IMG BXM-8-256. Uses tile based deferred rendering and according to Imagination is about 30% more power efficient than the previous generation.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Dimensity 7025: The Dimensity 7025 is a mid-range SoC with an integrated 5G modem. It includes two fast ARM Cortex-A78 cores running at up to 2.5 GHz and six power efficient Cortex-A55 cores at up to 2 GHz.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.70":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.Honor:
In 2014 Huawei created the sub brand Honor and offers certain smartphone series under this name. Occasionally the products are also called Huawei Honor.
The market share of Honor products is manageable, but there are several reviews on Honor smartphones with average ratings (as of 2016).
72.59%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.