Honor 400 Series

Graphics Adapter: Imagination IMG BXM-8-256, Qualcomm Adreno 720, Qualcomm Adreno 750
Display: 6.55 inch, 6.70 inch
Weight: 0.171kg, 0.184kg, 0.205kg
Price: 550, 800 euro
Average of 34 scores (from 47 reviews)
Honor 400
Specifications

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 7 Gen 3
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 720
Display: 6.55 inch, 19.5:9, 2736 x 1264 pixels
Weight: 0.184kg
Price: 550 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
During our test, the Honor 400 proved to be a fairly compact mid-range smartphone with a good camera, long-lasting battery, impressive AI functions and long update support. However, you'll still need to take into account a few compromises.
Foreign Reviews
Source: PC Welt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/04/2025
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: PC Welt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/04/2025
Rating: Total score: 90%
Honor 400 Pro
Specifications

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 SD 8 Gen 3
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 750
Display: 6.70 inch, 19.7:9, 2800 x 1280 pixels
Weight: 0.205kg
Price: 800 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Honor offers a ton of high-end technology at a somewhat more affordable price. The 400 Pro impresses with its many features: a bright display, large storage, and fast charging. Our review reveals where Honor has cut corners.
Source: Tech Nave

Overall, the HONOR 400 Pro is a solid mid-range phone that's worthwhile. It has a beautiful screen and a near-flagship chipset capable of playing the latest games and delivers good performance. In addition, it has a long battery life, ultra-fast charging, and a charger in the box. However, those expecting useful AI functionalities on the HONOR 400 Pro might be disappointed. HONOR still needs to polish features like AI Image to Video a bit more before they become fully viable. Hopefully, we can see some improvements with future updates. For alternatives, you can consider the HONOR 400 (RM1899). It has the same AI features as its Pro counterpart and is more affordable, in exchange for a slower chipset and charging speed. It also doesn't have a telephoto camera. Another option is the realme GT 7 (RM2599), which performs on par with the HONOR 400 Pro. However, this phone doesn't have any AI features. If you want a phone with an eye-catching design, the OPPO Reno13 (RM2299) could be a better option instead.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/05/2025
Source: Tech Nave

Overall, the HONOR 400 Pro is a solid mid-range phone that's worthwhile. It has a beautiful screen and a near-flagship chipset capable of playing the latest games and delivers good performance. In addition, it has a long battery life, ultra-fast charging, and a charger in the box. However, those expecting useful AI functionalities on the HONOR 400 Pro might be disappointed. HONOR still needs to polish features like AI Image to Video a bit more before they become fully viable. Hopefully, we can see some improvements with future updates. For alternatives, you can consider the HONOR 400 (RM1899). It has the same AI features as its Pro counterpart and is more affordable, in exchange for a slower chipset and charging speed. It also doesn't have a telephoto camera. Another option is the realme GT 7 (RM2599), which performs on par with the HONOR 400 Pro. However, this phone doesn't have any AI features. If you want a phone with an eye-catching design, the OPPO Reno13 (RM2299) could be a better option instead.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/05/2025
Foreign Reviews
Source: Smartzone

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/27/2025
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: Smartzone

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/27/2025
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: Nextpit Germany

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/15/2025
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Nextpit Germany

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/15/2025
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: PC Welt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/13/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: PC Welt

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/13/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Basic Tutorials

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/07/2025
Rating: Total score: 91% price: 100% performance: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100%
Source: Basic Tutorials

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/07/2025
Rating: Total score: 91% price: 100% performance: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100%
Source: Allround-PC.com

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2025
Source: Allround-PC.com

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2025
Source: Chip.de

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/29/2025
Rating: Total score: 96% price: 91% performance: 98% features: 96% display: 95% mobility: 96%
Source: Chip.de

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/29/2025
Rating: Total score: 96% price: 91% performance: 98% features: 96% display: 95% mobility: 96%
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/23/2025
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/23/2025
Honor 400 Lite
Specifications

Processor: Mediatek Dimensity 7025
Graphics Adapter: Imagination IMG BXM-8-256
Display: 6.70 inch, 20:9, 2412 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.171kg
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: Amateur Photographer

Most can’t justify spending a fortune on an iPhone, but still want the looks and camera handling of one. And that’s where the 400 Lite comes in. You obviously don’t get multiple high-resolution sensors or the speed or image quality of a flagship iPhone. But the Honor’s main camera performs well in most scenarios, sufficient for a beginner taking casual photos. On the whole, the Honor 400 Lite looks good, has a bright screen and a snappy camera button and most importantly, doesn’t break the bank.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/30/2025
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Expert Reviews

Im not a fan of Honor doubling down on the Apple cosplay. It feels like a lack of confidence in the product, which is madness because, as far as budget phones go, the Honor 400 Lite is one of the best. Performance and battery life are better than last year, the main camera is still a decent shooter, its IP65 rating means its more robust and that new 120Hz display makes everything feel lovely and smooth in use. Plus, of course, the software support is fantastic. I could have done without the superfluous camera button and the backup cameras arent up to the same standard as the main one, but otherwise, its extremely well-rounded. For £250, its a good amount of phone, and delivers the kind of value for money Apple fans can only dream of. It would, however, be nice to see Honor move away from imitation and commit to establishing its own identity with the next generation.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/28/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar

The Honor 400 Lite is a fascinating budget Android phone that seems way more enamored with the Apple way of doing things. Its similarity to the iPhone results in a solid handset with some appealing features, including a dedicated camera button and a handy notch widget system. However, the Honor 400 Lite takes its eye off the ball in some key areas, including performance and camera quality.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2025
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Cool Smartphone

Having used the Honour 400 Lite for a few days now, I can say that it falls firmly into the lower end of the current smartphone market. This is perfectly acceptable, as it aligns with the intended market. However, there are a couple of shortcomings that I’ve noticed. The most significant ones are the single loudspeaker setup and the lack of wireless charging. While these features are not uncommon in high-end or high-priced devices, they are still a downside for this phone. The performance can also be a bit slow at times. However, this may be due to the fact that the phone is currently running on pre-release software, as it is not officially launching until the end of the month. Despite these minor flaws, if you’re looking for a low-cost entry-level smartphone with good battery life and reasonable charging speeds, then the Honour 400 Lite might be worth considering. I’ll provide a more detailed review in the future, after I’ve had a chance to use the phone for a bit longer.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2025
Source: Stuff TV

If the Honor 400 Lite looked any different, it’d be lost in the shuffle. As affordable phones go it’s an alright performer, takes a decent enough photo, and can go all day on a charge – but the same can be said for most of its rivals. The top contenders also excel in one or more areas. The Poco X7 Pro lasts even longer and has more power; the Nothing Phone 3a has unique looks and streamlined software; the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion is way tougher. Honor’s own Magic 7 Lite remains the longevity champ, and you won’t mistake it for an iPhone. But maybe that’s exactly what you want? None of the cheap competition do such a convincing impression of a premium handset. If you don’t mind paying for that design, you’ll be happy enough with what the 400 Lite offers for the cash. A very affordable all-rounder that’s rather shameless in its iPhone inspirations. The Honor 400 Lite appeals to those who like the Apple look, but budget rivals arguably have more unique personalities.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/25/2025
Rating: Total score: 60%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Smartzone

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/24/2025
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 80% display: 95% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: Xataka

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/07/2025
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 68% display: 70% mobility: 75% workmanship: 65%
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/05/2025
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Hipertextual

Positive: Affordable price; beautiful design; impressive display; long battery life. Negative: Poor ultra-wide angle camera; average gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/05/2025
Source: Smart World

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/16/2025
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 70% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Multiplayer IT

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/15/2025
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/15/2025
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/14/2025
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 70% display: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 85%
Source: Batista70Phone

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/12/2025
Rating: Total score: 82% features: 80% display: 85% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/11/2025
Rating: price: 49% features: 73%
Source: Androidiani

Positive: Attractive price; great display; impressive cameras; beautiful design. Negative: Average battery life; mediocre gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/18/2025
Source: Mister Gadget

Positive: Good price; great AMOLED display; excellent autonomy; nice main camera. Negative: Mediocre design; poor ultra-wide angle camera; weak Wi-Fi.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/14/2025
Source: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade

Positive: Excellent main camera; bright AMOLED display; great autonomy; stylish design; light weight; smart AI Features. Negative: Mediocre ultra-wide angle camera; unsupported wireless charging; average gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/11/2025
Source: Ceotech

Positive: Elegant design; slim size; light weight; decent hardware; nice performance; smart AI Features; large battery capacity; good price. Negative: Poor video recording; mediocre secondary camera.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/11/2025
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/12/2025
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Clubic

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/09/2025
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 40% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Les Mobiles

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/09/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Les Numeriques

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2025
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: 01Net

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/06/2025
Rating: Total score: 52% price: 60% mobility: 20%
Source: Presse Citron

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2025
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 50% performance: 50% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Telepolis

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/12/2025
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Root Nation PL

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/07/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Co Nowego

Positive: Elegant design; slim size; light weight; good price; smooth performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/07/2025
Source: MobilArena HU

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/11/2025
Rating: price: 80% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Comment
Honor:
In 2014 Huawei created the sub brand Honor and offers certain smartphone series under this name. Occasionally the products are also called Huawei Honor.
The market share of Honor products is manageable, but there are several reviews on Honor smartphones with average ratings (as of 2016).
Modern games should be playable with these graphics cards at low settings and resolutions. Casual gamers may be happy with these cards.
Qualcomm Adreno 720: Graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 SoC.
Qualcomm Adreno 750: Graphics chip for smartphones and tablets that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SoC. Qualcomm claims that it is 25% faster than the Adreno 7340 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and first benchmarks show that the GPU can beat the Apple A17 Pro iGPU.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
Imagination IMG BXM-8-256: Single core variant of the IMG BXM-8-256. Uses tile based deferred rendering and according to Imagination is about 30% more power efficient than the previous generation.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
SD 7 Gen 3: Mid-range SoC with 8 Kryo cores (1x ARM Cortex-A715 2.63 GHz prime core, 3x ARM Cortex A715 2.4 GHz performance cluster, 4x ARM Cortex A510 with 1.8 efficiency cluster) and an X63 5G modem. The chip is manufactured using the modern 4nm process.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8:
SD 8 Gen 3: High-end SoC for smartphones that was introduced in late 2022 with a fast prime core based on a ARM Cortex-X3 architecture clocked at up to 3.2 GHz. Two more performance cores are based on the A715 and also support only 64 bit applications. The two additional A710 cores support also 32 bit applications as do the power saving Cortex-A510 cores. In addition to the processor cores, the SoC integrates a WiFi 7 modem, a Hexagon DSP (for AI acceleration) and a Spectra ISP. The integrated memory controller supports fast LPDDR5x memory with up to 4,200 MHz. 5G is included in the chip with the Snapdragon X70 modem.
Mediatek :
Dimensity 7025: The Dimensity 7025 is a mid-range SoC with an integrated 5G modem. It includes two fast ARM Cortex-A78 cores running at up to 2.5 GHz and six power efficient Cortex-A55 cores at up to 2 GHz.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
77.94%: This rating is not earth-shattering. This rating must actually be seen as average, since there are about as many devices with worse ratings as better ones. A purchase recommendation can only be seen with a lot of goodwill, unless it is about websites that generally rate strictly.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.