Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

ARM Mali-G52 MP1

ARM Mali-G52 MP2

The ARM Mali-G52 MP1 (or G52MC1) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based Tablets). It was introduced mid 2020 in the MediaTek MT8168 with a clock speed of up to 800 MHz.

The G52 is based on the Bifrost architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. ARM claims that the G52 series offers 30% more performance density and 15% better energy efficiency compared to the ARM Mali G51 series.

The performance of the G52MP2 in our benchmarks (in the MediaTek MT8168) is clearly below the G52 MP2 version in the entry level. That means its not well suited for demanding 3D Android games like PUBG Mobile.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

ManufacturerARM
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP2 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
ArchitectureBifrost
Pipelines1 - unified
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryno
technology12 nm
Date of Announcement29.07.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://developer.arm.com/ip-products/gr...
CPU in Mali-G52 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 8508 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek MT81684 x 2000 MHz? MHz800 MHz
min. - max.? MHz800 MHz

Benchmarks

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
30 fps 32 fps ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
19 fps 28 fps 36 fps 39 fps 40 fps ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high
27.5 fps 29 fps 30 fps 33 fps ~ 30 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
30 fps  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
27 fps  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
28 fps 30 fps 30 fps ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high
17 fps 25.5 fps 29 fps ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.17
log 25. 10:12:47

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:26:44 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.052s ... 0.052s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.052s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.052s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10459 +0.014s ... 0.066s

#7 got single benchmarks 10459 +0.011s ... 0.077s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.077s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.135s ... 0.212s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.212s

#11 Got 20 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.218s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.218s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.219s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.035s ... 0.254s

#15 return log +0.047s ... 0.301s

Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-G52 MP1 graphics card

Amazon Fire HD 8 2020: MediaTek MT8168, 8.00", 0.4 kg
  Review » Amazon Fire HD 8 (2020) Tablet Review: Updated Fire Tablet offers significantly more power

Amazon Fire HD 8 Kids Edition 2020: MediaTek MT8168, 8.00", 0.4 kg
  Review » Amazon Fire HD 8 Kids Edition (2020) Review - Affordable Kids Tablet with Good Sound

Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020: MediaTek MT8168, 8.00", 0.4 kg
  Review » Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 Tablet Review: More RAM and QI Standard

Motorola Moto G20: UNISOC Tiger T700, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Motorola Moto G20 smartphone review: A fast screen in the affordable smartphone

Samsung Galaxy A21s: Samsung Exynos 850, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy A21s Smartphone Review - Quad-camera on the cheap

Samsung Galaxy M12: Samsung Exynos 850, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy M12 smartphone review: Strong battery in the budget Galaxy phone

Samsung Galaxy XCover 5: Samsung Exynos 850, 5.30", 0.2 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 Smartphone Review - Small improvements for the rugged smartphone

Amazon Fire HD 8 2020: MediaTek MT8168, 8.00", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Amazon Fire HD 8 2020

Amazon Fire HD 8 Kids Edition 2020: MediaTek MT8168, 8.00", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Amazon Fire HD 8 Kids Edition 2020

Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020: MediaTek MT8168, 8.00", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020

Motorola Moto G20: UNISOC Tiger T700, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G20

realme C21Y: unknown, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme C21Y

Samsung Galaxy A21s: Samsung Exynos 850, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A21s

Samsung Galaxy M12: Samsung Exynos 850, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy M12

Samsung Galaxy XCover 5: Samsung Exynos 850, 5.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy XCover 5

Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020: MediaTek MT8168, 8.00", 0.4 kg
   » Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus (2020): Do we really need two Fire HD 8 versions?

Motorola Moto G20: UNISOC Tiger T700, 6.50", 0.2 kg
   » Motorola Moto G20: Good equipment at a low price

Samsung Galaxy A21s: Samsung Exynos 850, 6.50", 0.2 kg
   » The Samsung Galaxy A21s has a performance problem

Samsung Galaxy M12: Samsung Exynos 850, 6.50", 0.2 kg
   » Galaxy M12: Is Samsung unable to make cheap phones?

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

UHD Graphics 770
A15 GPU 5-Core *
A15 GPU 4-Core *

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > ARM Mali-G52 MP1 GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-07-29)