Notebookcheck Logo

PowerVR GE8300

The PowerVR GE8300 by Imagination Technologies is an integrated graphics card for mid-range ARM SoCs. It belongs to the Series8XE series of GPUs (GE8xx0) and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2, Android NN HAL API and Vulkan 1.0.

PowerVR Series8XE Series

PowerVR GE8320 compare @ 0.4 - 0.65 GHz
PowerVR GE8300 @ 0.66 GHz
PowerVR GE8100 compare @ 0.57 GHz
ArchitecturePowerVR Series8XE
Core Speed660 MHz
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 10, OpenGL 3.x, 4.x, OpenGL ES 3.0
technology20 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 1.2, Android NN HAL API Support
Date of Announcement09.09.2014
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.imgtec.com/powervr-gpu/ge8320/
CPU in PowerVR GE8300GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
UNISOC Tiger T3104 x 1800 MHz? MHz800 MHz
Mediatek Helio A22 MT67614 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek MT8766B4 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D4 x 1800 MHz? MHz550 MHz
min. - max.? MHz550 - 800 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 6349     avg: 7555     median: 7567 (1%)     max: 8643 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
4908 Points (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 442     avg: 525     median: 509 (3%)     max: 763 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 390     avg: 469.6     median: 458 (1%)     max: 712 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 238     avg: 306.5     median: 299 (2%)     max: 509 Points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 197     avg: 258.1     median: 253 (1%)     max: 443 Points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.38     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.48 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.7     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (0%)     max: 1.4 fps
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 1.9     avg: 2.6     median: 2.3 (0%)     max: 4.2 fps
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 1.8     avg: 2.1     median: 2 (0%)     max: 2.9 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 2.5     avg: 4.4     median: 4.3 (0%)     max: 6.2 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 5.9     avg: 6.9     median: 6.6 (0%)     max: 9.2 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 13     avg: 14.6     median: 14 (0%)     max: 20 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 9927     avg: 11148     median: 11148 (1%)     max: 12369 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
7.5 fps (0%)
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 2563     avg: 7985     median: 3272 (3%)     max: 27482 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 536     avg: 910     median: 678 (1%)     max: 1991 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 3.14     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (1%)     max: 3.33 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
00.20.40.60.70.91.11.31.51.71.822.22.42.62.82.93.13.33.5Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
44  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
39  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
21 25 26 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
16 25 26 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
0 (!) 24 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
32 53 59 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
31 50 52 ~ 44 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
38  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
17 29 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
23  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
7 8.5 9 9.5 28 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
8 9 14 ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift44
Call of Duty Mobile39
Armajet30
PUBG Mobile242212
Arena of Valor4844
Shadow Fight 338
Dead Trigger 230
Asphalt 8: Airborne2323
Asphalt 9: Legends1210
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		3
4

1


3
2


1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.25
log 26. 17:22:37

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:58:45 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.052s ... 0.053s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.053s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.053s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9838 +0.016s ... 0.069s

#7 got single benchmarks 9838 +0.067s ... 0.136s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.136s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.268s ... 0.404s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.404s

#11 Got 30 rows for game benchmarks. +0.013s ... 0.417s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.417s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.421s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.144s ... 0.564s

#15 return log +0.059s ... 0.623s

Notebook reviews with PowerVR GE8300 graphics card

Lenovo Tab M8 2023 (Gen 4)

Lenovo Tab M8 2023 (Gen 4) LTE tablet – A performance downgrade for the affordable 8-inch tablet

No sooner had we finished reviewing the third generation Lenovo Tab M8 when Lenovo had already launched its 4th gen device. A few things have changed, both desi...
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 | PowerVR GE8300 | 8.00" | 320 g
Blackview BV5200

Blackview BV5200 smartphone review - Inexpensive and robust with NFC

Blackview offers the BV5200 for those who do not want to spend a lot of money on an outdoor cell phone: a handy and relatively light, water- and dust-proof smar...
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 | PowerVR GE8300 | 6.10" | 268 g
Ulefone Note 14

Ulefone Note 14 smartphone review - What can the phone do for 100 Euros?

The Ulefone Note 14 comes with Android 12 and a comprehensive accessories package. You can get it for as little as 100 Euros (~$109), but you have to be willing...
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 | PowerVR GE8300 | 6.52" | 189 g
Cubot Pocket

Cubot Pocket Smartphone Review: Extremely handy Android phone for little money

The screen of the Cubot Pocket measures just 4 inches, making it ideal for small hands and narrow pockets. Cubot's ultra-handy Android phones are not quite as c...
UNISOC Tiger T310 | PowerVR GE8300 | 4.00" | 128 g
Doogee X95 Pro Smartphone Review: Face ID and Android 10 For $100

Doogee X95 Pro Smartphone Review: Face ID and Android 10 For $100

How many corners must you cut when aiming for such a low price point? Not as much as one might expect, apparently. The Doogee X95 Pro works well as a backup sma...
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D | PowerVR GE8300 | 6.52" | 177 g

Cubot King Kong Mini 2: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 4.00", 0.1 kg
  Review »