Notebookcheck Logo

PowerVR GE8300

The PowerVR GE8300 by Imagination Technologies is an integrated graphics card for mid-range ARM SoCs. It belongs to the Series8XE series of GPUs (GE8xx0) and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2, Android NN HAL API and Vulkan 1.0.

PowerVR Series8XE Series

PowerVR GE8320 compare @ 0.4 - 0.65 GHz
PowerVR GE8300 @ 0.66 GHz
PowerVR GE8100 compare @ 0.57 GHz
ArchitecturePowerVR Series8XE
Core Speed660 MHz
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 10, OpenGL 3.x, 4.x, OpenGL ES 3.0
technology20 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 1.2, Android NN HAL API Support
Date of Announcement09.09.2014
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.imgtec.com
CPU in PowerVR GE8300GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
UNISOC Tiger T3104 x 1800 MHz? MHz800 MHz
Mediatek Helio A22 MT67614 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek MT8766B4 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? MHz? - 800 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 6349     avg: 7555     median: 7567 (1%)     max: 8643 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
4908 Points (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 442     avg: 525     median: 509 (2%)     max: 763 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 390     avg: 469.6     median: 458 (1%)     max: 712 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 238     avg: 306.5     median: 299 (1%)     max: 509 Points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 197     avg: 258.1     median: 253 (1%)     max: 443 Points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 411     avg: 472.7     median: 463 (4%)     max: 712 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 357     avg: 417.5     median: 414 (2%)     max: 618 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 239     avg: 273.2     median: 266 (1%)     max: 406 Points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 197     avg: 243.9     median: 222.5 (1%)     max: 508 Points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.38     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.48 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.7     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (0%)     max: 1.4 fps
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 1.9     avg: 2.6     median: 2.3 (0%)     max: 4.2 fps
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 1.8     avg: 2.1     median: 2 (0%)     max: 2.9 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 2.5     avg: 4.4     median: 4.3 (0%)     max: 6.2 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 5.9     avg: 6.9     median: 6.6 (0%)     max: 9.2 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 13     avg: 14.6     median: 14 (0%)     max: 20 fps
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 9927     avg: 11148     median: 11148 (1%)     max: 12369 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
7.5 fps (0%)
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 2563     avg: 7985     median: 3272 (1%)     max: 27482 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 536     avg: 910     median: 678 (1%)     max: 1991 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 3.14     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (1%)     max: 3.33 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
00.20.40.60.70.91.11.31.51.71.822.22.42.62.82.93.13.33.5Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
44  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
39  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
21 25 26 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
16 25 26 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
0 (!) 24 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
32 53 59 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
31 50 52 ~ 44 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
38  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
17 29 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
23  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
7 8.5 9 9.5 28 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
8 9 14 ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift44
Call of Duty Mobile39
Armajet30
PUBG Mobile242212
Arena of Valor4844
Shadow Fight 338
Dead Trigger 230
Asphalt 8: Airborne2323
Asphalt 9: Legends1210
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		3
4

1


3
2


1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 14. 16:29:32

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 13 May 2025 05:33:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.028s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.028s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9838 +0.015s ... 0.043s

#8 got single benchmarks 9838 +0.052s ... 0.095s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.095s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.437s ... 0.532s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.532s

#12 Got 30 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.54s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.54s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.543s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.05s ... 0.593s

#16 return log +0.003s ... 0.596s

Notebook reviews with PowerVR GE8300 graphics card

PocketBook Color Note review – The high-quality e-ink tablet with pen input has one problem

PocketBook Color Note review – The high-quality e-ink tablet with pen input has one problem

Thanks to a large e-ink screen that can display colors, the PocketBook Color Note is perfect for browsing through books, writing notes and drawing. It also come...
Allwinner B810 | PowerVR GE8300 | 10.30" | 390 g
Lenovo Tab M8 2023 (Gen 4)

Lenovo Tab M8 2023 (Gen 4) LTE tablet – A performance downgrade for the affordable 8-inch tablet

No sooner had we finished reviewing the third generation Lenovo Tab M8 when Lenovo had already launched its 4th gen device. A few things have changed, both desi...
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 | PowerVR GE8300 | 8.00" | 320 g
Blackview BV5200

Blackview BV5200 smartphone review - Inexpensive and robust with NFC

Blackview offers the BV5200 for those who do not want to spend a lot of money on an outdoor cell phone: a handy and relatively light, water- and dust-proof smar...
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 | PowerVR GE8300 | 6.10" | 268 g
Ulefone Note 14

Ulefone Note 14 smartphone review - What can the phone do for 100 Euros?

The Ulefone Note 14 comes with Android 12 and a comprehensive accessories package. You can get it for as little as 100 Euros (~$109), but you have to be willing...
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 | PowerVR GE8300 | 6.52" | 189 g
Cubot Pocket

Cubot Pocket Smartphone Review: Extremely handy Android phone for little money

The screen of the Cubot Pocket measures just 4 inches, making it ideal for small hands and narrow pockets. Cubot's ultra-handy Android phones are not quite as c...
UNISOC Tiger T310 | PowerVR GE8300 | 4.00" | 128 g

Doogee X95 Pro: Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  Review » Doogee X95 Pro Smartphone Review: Face ID and Android 10 For $100

Cubot King Kong Mini 2: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 4.00", 0.1 kg
  Review » Cubot King Kong Mini 2 Smartphone Review- Small outdoor phone without IP protection

Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020: Mediatek MT8766B, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  Review » Alcatel 3T 10 (2020) Review - Cheap 4G tablet with limitations

CAT S42: Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » CAT S42 Smartphone Review – Robust, rubberised and washable smartphone

Blackview BV5900: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.70", 0.3 kg
  Review » Blackview BV5900 Smartphone Review – Outdoor Smartphone with Long Battery Life

Cubot Kingkong Mini: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 4.00", 0.1 kg
  Review » Cubot KingKong Mini Smartphone Review – Handy Mobile Phone from China

Nokia 2.3: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.20", 0.2 kg
  Review » Nokia 2.3 Review - Smartphone with long battery life and Android One for little money

Huawei Y6s: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, 6.09", 0.2 kg
  Review » Huawei Y6s Smartphone Review – Similar, But Better

Gigaset GS190: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  Review » Review Gigaset GS190 Smartphone – Too expensive despite large battery?

TP-Link Neffos X20: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.26", 0.2 kg
  Review » Review TP-Link Neffos X20: Cheap smartphone with long battery life

Blackview A60 Pro: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  Review » Blackview A60 Pro Smartphone Review: A compelling offer?

Oukitel C15 Pro: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.09", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oukitel C15 Pro Smartphone Review: A weak budget handset with a bright display

Huawei Y5 2019: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.71", 0.1 kg
  Review » Huawei Y5 2019 Smartphone Review: Better than last year

Huawei Y6 2019: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.09", 0.2 kg
  Review » Huawei Y6 (2019) Smartphone Review

Umidigi G1 Plus: Mediatek MT8766B, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Umidigi G1 Plus

TCL Tab 10L Gen 2: Mediatek MT8766B, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  External Review » TCL Tab 10L Gen 2

Ulefone Armor Pad Lite: Mediatek MT8766B, 8.00", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Armor Pad Lite

Blackview BV4800: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.56", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Blackview BV4800

Umidigi G5A: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Umidigi G5A

Blackview BV6200: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.56", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Blackview BV6200

Umidigi G2: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Umidigi G2

Blackview BV5300: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.10", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Blackview BV5300

Blackview A53: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Blackview A53

Ulefone Note 14: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Note 14

Ulefone Note 14 Pro: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Note 14 Pro

Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4): Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 8.00", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)

Xiaomi Poco C50: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco C50

Oukitel C31: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oukitel C31

Xiaomi Redmi A1+: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi A1+

Xiaomi Redmi A1: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi A1

BQ RU 6868L: UNISOC Tiger T310, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » BQ RU 6868L

Umidigi A13s: UNISOC Tiger T310, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Umidigi A13s

Nokia C100: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.45", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nokia C100

Nokia C200: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.09", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nokia C200

TCL Tab 8: Mediatek MT8766B, 8.00", 0.3 kg
  External Review » TCL Tab 8

Ulefone Note 6T: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Note 6T

Oukitel WP20: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.93", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Oukitel WP20

Wiko T10: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Wiko T10

TCL Tab 10L: unknown, 10.10", 0.4 kg
  External Review » TCL Tab 10L

Cubot Pocket: UNISOC Tiger T310, 4.00", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Cubot Pocket

Infinix Hot 12i: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Hot 12i

Ulefone Note 10P: unknown, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Note 10P

TCL 305: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TCL 305

Oukitel WP18: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.93", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Oukitel WP18

BQ RU 6061L Slim: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.09", 0.2 kg
  External Review » BQ RU 6061L Slim

Acer Enduro Urban T1 EUT110-11A-K67C: unknown, 10.10", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Enduro Urban T1 EUT110-11A-K67C

Ulefone Armor X10: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.45", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Armor X10

Philips PH1: unknown, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Philips PH1

Philips PH2: unknown, 6.21", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Philips PH2

Umidigi Bison X10S NFC: unknown, 6.53", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Umidigi Bison X10S NFC

Umidigi Bison X10G NFC: unknown, 6.53", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Umidigi Bison X10G NFC

Alcatel TKEE Mini: unknown, 7.00", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Alcatel TKEE Mini

Umidigi Power 5S: unknown, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Umidigi Power 5S

Umidigi A11S: unknown, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Umidigi A11S

Lenovo Tab M7 TTB-7306F: unknown, 7.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Tab M7 TTB-7306F

Infinix Smart 5A: Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Smart 5A

Doogee X95 Pro: Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Doogee X95 Pro

Alcatel 1T 10 2020: unknown, 10.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Alcatel 1T 10 2020

Wiko Y81: Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, 6.20", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Wiko Y81

Cubot Note 20: Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Cubot Note 20

Cubot P40: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.20", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Cubot P40

Lenovo Smart Tab M8 TB-8505FS: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 8.00", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Smart Tab M8 TB-8505FS

CAT S42: Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » CAT S42

Umidigi A3X: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Umidigi A3X

Ulefone Armor X7: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Armor X7

Cubot Kingkong Mini: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 4.00", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Cubot Kingkong Mini

Huawei Y6s: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, 6.09", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Y6s

Blackview A60 Pro: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Blackview A60 Pro

Umidigi A3S: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Umidigi A3S

TP-Link Neffos C9 Max: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.09", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TP-Link Neffos C9 Max

Cubot R15 Pro: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.26", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Cubot R15 Pro

TP-Link Neffos C9s: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.71", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TP-Link Neffos C9s

Nokia 2.3: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.20", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nokia 2.3

Blackview BV6100: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.88", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Blackview BV6100

Gigaset GS190: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Gigaset GS190

Cubot R19: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.71", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Cubot R19

Blackview BV5900: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.70", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Blackview BV5900

TP-Link Neffos X20: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.26", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TP-Link Neffos X20

Coolpad Cool 3 Plus: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.71", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Coolpad Cool 3 Plus

Ulefone Note 7P: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Note 7P

Oukitel C15 Pro: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.09", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oukitel C15 Pro

Cubot Quest Lite: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Cubot Quest Lite

Nokia 2.2: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.71", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nokia 2.2

Huawei Y5 2019: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.71", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei Y5 2019

Honor 8S: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.71", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Honor 8S

Huawei Y6 2019: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.09", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Y6 2019

CAT S42: Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, 5.50", 0.2 kg
   » CAT S42: Cheaper than the predecessor, but is it better?

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2019-05- 8)