Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

PowerVR GE8300

The PowerVR GE8300 by Imagination Technologies is an integrated graphics card for mid-range ARM SoCs. It belongs to the Series8XE series of GPUs (GE8xx0) and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2, Android NN HAL API and Vulkan 1.0.

ManufacturerImagination
PowerVR Series8XE Series
PowerVR GE8320 compare @ 0.65 GHz
PowerVR GE8300 @ 0.66 GHz
PowerVR GE8100 compare @ 0.57 GHz
ArchitecturePowerVR Series8XE
Core Speed660 MHz
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 10
technology20 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 1.2, Android NN HAL API Support
Date of Announcement09.09.2014
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.imgtec.com/powervr-gpu/ge8320/
CPU in PowerVR GE8300GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek Helio A22 MT67614 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek MT8766B4 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D4 x 1800 MHz? MHz550 MHz
min. - max.? MHz550 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 442     avg: 513     median: 507 (4%)     max: 763 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 390     avg: 459     median: 457 (1%)     max: 712 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
44 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
39 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
26 fps  fps    + Compare
med.
26 fps  fps    + Compare
high
0 (!) 24 fps ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
32 fps 53 fps 59 fps ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra
31 fps 50 fps 52 fps ~ 44 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
38 fps  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
30 fps  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
17 fps  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
fps 8.5 fps fps 9.5 fps 28 fps ~ 12 fps    + Compare
high
fps fps 14 fps ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 02. 18:10:00

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 31 Jul 2021 12:11:16 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.042s ... 0.042s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.042s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.042s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9838 +0.014s ... 0.056s

#7 got single benchmarks 9838 +0.021s ... 0.077s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.077s

#9 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.142s ... 0.219s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.229s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.229s

#12 Got 23 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.238s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.238s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.239s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.056s ... 0.295s

#16 return log +0.047s ... 0.342s

Notebook reviews with PowerVR GE8300 graphics card

Alcatel 3T 10 4G 2020: Mediatek MT8766B, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  Review » Alcatel 3T 10 (2020) Review - Cheap 4G tablet with limitations

Blackview A60 Pro: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  Review » Blackview A60 Pro Smartphone Review: A compelling offer?

Blackview BV5900: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.70", 0.3 kg
  Review » Blackview BV5900 Smartphone Review – Outdoor Smartphone with Long Battery Life

CAT S42: Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » CAT S42 Smartphone Review – Robust, rubberised and washable smartphone

Cubot King Kong Mini 2: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 4.00", 0.1 kg
  Review » Cubot King Kong Mini 2 Smartphone Review- Small outdoor phone without IP protection

Cubot Kingkong Mini: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 4.00", 0.1 kg
  Review » Cubot KingKong Mini Smartphone Review – Handy Mobile Phone from China

Doogee X95 Pro: Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  Review » Doogee X95 Pro Smartphone Review: Face ID and Android 10 For $100

Gigaset GS190: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  Review » Review Gigaset GS190 Smartphone – Too expensive despite large battery?

Huawei Y5 2019: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.71", 0.1 kg
  Review » Huawei Y5 2019 Smartphone Review: Better than last year

Huawei Y6 2019: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.09", 0.2 kg
  Review » Huawei Y6 (2019) Smartphone Review

Huawei Y6s: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, 6.09", 0.2 kg
  Review » Huawei Y6s Smartphone Review – Similar, But Better

Nokia 2.3: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.20", 0.2 kg
  Review » Nokia 2.3 Review - Smartphone with long battery life and Android One for little money

Oukitel C15 Pro: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.09", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oukitel C15 Pro Smartphone Review: A weak budget handset with a bright display

TP-Link Neffos X20: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.26", 0.2 kg
  Review » Review TP-Link Neffos X20: Cheap smartphone with long battery life

Alcatel 1T 10 2020: unknown, 10.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Alcatel 1T 10 2020

Blackview A60 Pro: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Blackview A60 Pro

Blackview BV5900: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.70", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Blackview BV5900

Blackview BV6100: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.88", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Blackview BV6100

CAT S42: Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, 5.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » CAT S42

Coolpad Cool 3 Plus: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.71", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Coolpad Cool 3 Plus

Cubot Kingkong Mini: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 4.00", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Cubot Kingkong Mini

Cubot Note 20: Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Cubot Note 20

Cubot P40: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.20", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Cubot P40

Cubot Quest Lite: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Cubot Quest Lite

Cubot R15 Pro: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.26", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Cubot R15 Pro

Cubot R19: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.71", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Cubot R19

Doogee X95 Pro: Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Doogee X95 Pro

Gigaset GS190: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Gigaset GS190

Honor 8S: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.71", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Honor 8S

Huawei Y5 2019: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.71", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Huawei Y5 2019

Huawei Y6 2019: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.09", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Y6 2019

Huawei Y6s: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, 6.09", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Y6s

Lenovo Smart Tab M8 TB-8505FS: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 8.00", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Smart Tab M8 TB-8505FS

Nokia 2.2: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.71", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nokia 2.2

Nokia 2.3: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.20", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nokia 2.3

Oukitel C15 Pro: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.09", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oukitel C15 Pro

TP-Link Neffos C9 Max: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.09", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TP-Link Neffos C9 Max

TP-Link Neffos C9s: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.71", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TP-Link Neffos C9s

TP-Link Neffos X20: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.26", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TP-Link Neffos X20

Ulefone Armor X7: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Armor X7

Ulefone Note 7P: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 6.10", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Note 7P

Umidigi A3S: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Umidigi A3S

Umidigi A3X: Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, 5.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Umidigi A3X

Wiko Y81: Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, 6.20", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Wiko Y81

CAT S42: Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, 5.50", 0.2 kg
   » CAT S42: Cheaper than the predecessor, but is it better?

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Radeon Pro W6800

Class 3

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > PowerVR GE8300 GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2019-05- 8)