Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12

The 12-core Immortalis-G925 is a fast integrated GPU for ARM processors that has hardware ray tracing, Accuracy Super Resolution and other modern technologies. The G925 can have up to 24 "cores"; the 12-core variant is the iGPU that the Dimensity 9400 processor comes equipped with.

It's based on the 5th generation ARM graphics architecture. It's ready to power three-display folding phones as well as drive "WQHD+" resolution displays at up to 180 Hz, and it also HW-decodes the codecs that matter most - AVC, HEVC, VP9, AV1.

Performance

The iGPU delivers ~2700 3DMark Steel Nomad Light points, making it nearly as fast as the Qualcomm Adreno 830.

Immortalis-G925 Series

Immortalis-G925 MC16 compare 12
Immortalis-G925 MC12 12
Immortalis-G925 MC11 compare 11
Architecture5th Gen
Pipelines12 - unified
Memory TypeLPDDR5x
Shared Memoryyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
technology3 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, Vulkan 1.2, ASTC, AFBC
Date of Announcement09.10.2024
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
CPU in Immortalis-G925 MC12GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+8 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek Dimensity 94008 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 2054     avg: 2343     median: 2365 (5%)     max: 2577 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 19751     avg: 22129     median: 22436 (11%)     max: 23699 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 5383     avg: 6039     median: 6076 (7%)     max: 6601 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 9461     avg: 10620     median: 10286 (5%)     max: 11737 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
min: 880     avg: 954     median: 953.5 (20%)     max: 1027 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
23762 Points (100%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
36299 Points (90%)
91.7 -100%
...
18081 -50%
20018 -45%
20857 -43%
24115 -34%
25100 -31%
25517 -30%
25707 -29%
26213 -28%
29111 -20%
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12
36299
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 35     avg: 45.9     median: 46 (17%)     max: 54 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 66     avg: 98.4     median: 98 (18%)     max: 129 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 181     avg: 263     median: 258 (19%)     max: 323 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 119     avg: 159     median: 168.5 (16%)     max: 188 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 266     avg: 320.1     median: 314.5 (7%)     max: 359 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 334     avg: 423.9     median: 424.5 (18%)     max: 511 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 628     avg: 772     median: 789.5 (6%)     max: 853 fps
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 457136     avg: 1066780     median: 1162950 (80%)     max: 1227090 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
319 fps (8%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 20238     avg: 20918     median: 20536 (5%)     max: 22036 points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 21860     avg: 22484     median: 22387 (6%)     max: 22921 points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 9.53     avg: 11.6     median: 11 (4%)     max: 14.7 Watt
0123456789101112131415Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
59.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra Ultra
59.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
59.8 59.9 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
59.4 59.9 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
86.8 118 119 119 120 ~ 113 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
59.2 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
39.6 39.9 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
116 120 ~ 118 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal59.659.7
Genshin Impact6060
PUBG Mobile1136040
Dead Trigger 2118
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
2





2

2
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.34
log 31. 10:30:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 31 Oct 2025 05:36:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.023s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.023s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12888 +0.012s ... 0.035s

#8 got single benchmarks 12888 +0.021s ... 0.056s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.056s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.278s ... 0.335s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.335s

#12 Got 25 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.345s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.345s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.346s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.029s ... 0.375s

#16 return log +0.002s ... 0.378s

Notebook reviews with ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 graphics card

Xiaomi Pad Mini

Cheaper, faster and more modern than the Apple iPad Mini - Xiaomi Pad Mini tablet review

The small 8.8-inch Xiaomi Pad Mini delivers performance and features you’d usually expect only from high-end smartphones. It offers up to 512 GB of storage and,...
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ | ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 | 8.80" | 326 g
The premium tablet for work, entertainment and all things creative - Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 5G review

The premium tablet for work, entertainment and all things creative - Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 5G review

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 5G is a super-slim high-end tablet with a huge display, powerful performance, and versatile features. Whether for work, creativ...
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ | ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 | 14.60" | 695 g
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 tablet review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

A superb tablet experience with caveats - Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 review

Samsung's compact flagship tablet offers the best hardware, long updates, and, of course, the new S Pen. Read our review of the Android tablet to find out wheth...
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ | ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 | 11.00" | 469 g
Review: Xiaomi Redmi K Pad

Enthusiasts have long awaited the arrival of this ultra-light tablet featuring dual USB ports – Xiaomi Redmi K Pad review

It's unfortunate that this device is currently limited to regional availability. With a high-end SoC at its core, the compact Xiaomi Redmi K Pad delivers perfor...
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ | ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 | 8.80" | 326 g
Vivo Pad 5 Pro review

The Chinese "iPad Air" puts pressure on Apple – Vivo Pad 5 Pro review

Vivo's Pad 5 Pro is a relatively affordable tablet that still features a high-end SoC and a 13-inch display with a practical 3:2 aspect ratio. This places it in...
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 | ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 | 13.00" | 578 g

Vivo X200 Pro Mini: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.31", 0.2 kg
  Review » The best compact smartphone for photography - Vivo X200 Pro Mini review

Vivo X200 Pro: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  Review » The best photo smartphone of 2024 comes with Android - Vivo X200 Pro review

Oppo Find X8 Pro: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  Review » Oppo Find X8 Pro smartphone review - Attack on the iPhone with innovative battery technology

Xiaomi 15T Pro: Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, 6.83", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi 15T Pro

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11: Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S11

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra: Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, 14.60", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+: Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+

Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra: Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, 6.83", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra

Xiaomi Redmi K Pad: Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, 8.80", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K Pad

Vivo Pad 5 Pro: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 13.00", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Vivo Pad 5 Pro

Oppo Find X8s: Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, 6.32", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Find X8s

Vivo X200s: Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X200s

OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra: Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, 6.83", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra

Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro

Oppo Find X8 Pro: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Find X8 Pro

Vivo X200 Pro Mini: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.31", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X200 Pro Mini

Vivo X200 Pro: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X200 Pro

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra: Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, 14.60", 0.7 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra: Is it worth switching from the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra?

   » Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra - Thinner, lighter, smarter

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11: Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, 11.00", 0.5 kg
   » 4 reasons why the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 could be a disappointment for some users

   » Why the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 would have been better as a Galaxy Tab S20

   » The new Samsung S Pen for the Galaxy Tab S11 series is awesome and controversial in design

   » Leak: Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra may be as thin as Apple's iPad Pro 13

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra: Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, 14.60", 0.7 kg
   » Leak: Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra may be as thin as Apple's iPad Pro 13

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11: Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, 11.00", 0.5 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Tab S11, Tab S11 Ultra and Tab S10 Lite: All Euro prices, specs and configurations leaked

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra: Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, 14.60", 0.7 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Tab S11, Tab S11 Ultra and Tab S10 Lite: All Euro prices, specs and configurations leaked

Vivo Pad 5 Pro: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 13.00", 0.6 kg
   » Vivo Pad 5 Pro: A solid tablet that holds its own against the big brands

Vivo X200 Pro Mini: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.31", 0.2 kg
   » Vivo X300 Pro Mini specs leak points to massive battery and flagship experience despite "small" 6.3-inch display

Vivo X200s: Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Vivo launches X200s: Slim flagship with three 50 MP Zeiss cameras and 6,200 mAh battery

   » Official: Vivo X200 Ultra launch date confirmed alongside first press photo

Oppo Find X8s: Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, 6.32", 0.2 kg
   » Oppo Find X8 Ultra news roundup: Impressive Hasselblad camera samples, official packaging and new teasers

Vivo X200 Pro: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.78", 0.2 kg
   » Vivo X200 Pro's massive success could lead to global version of the ultimate Zeiss camera flagship

Vivo X200 Pro Mini: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.31", 0.2 kg
   » Vivo X200 Pro's massive success could lead to global version of the ultimate Zeiss camera flagship

   » Verdict on the Vivo X200 Pro Mini: Top smartphone for small hands

Vivo X200 Pro: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.78", 0.2 kg
   » A smartphone of extremes: Verdict on the Vivo X200 Pro

Oppo Find X8 Pro: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.78", 0.2 kg
   » Camera test: Clear winner in a comparison between the OnePlus 13, Oppo Find X8 Pro and Vivo X200 Pro

Vivo X200 Pro: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.78", 0.2 kg
   » Camera test: Clear winner in a comparison between the OnePlus 13, Oppo Find X8 Pro and Vivo X200 Pro

   » Trouble in Zeiss camera paradise as Vivo X200 Pro users complain about unsightly lens flare problem

Vivo X200 Pro Mini: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.31", 0.2 kg
   » Trouble in Zeiss camera paradise as Vivo X200 Pro users complain about unsightly lens flare problem

Oppo Find X8 Pro: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.78", 0.2 kg
   » Oppo Find X8 Pro: Dual-telephoto confirmed and many new photos revealed shortly before launch

Vivo X200 Pro: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.78", 0.2 kg
   » Vivo X200 Pro video and new sample photos reveal how far the sharp eye of the 200 MP Zeiss zoom camera reaches

Vivo X200 Pro Mini: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.31", 0.2 kg
   » Vivo X200 Pro video and new sample photos reveal how far the sharp eye of the 200 MP Zeiss zoom camera reaches

Oppo Find X8 Pro: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.78", 0.2 kg
   » Oppo Find X8 and Vivo X200: Global launch expected very soon

Vivo X200 Pro: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.78", 0.2 kg
   » Oppo Find X8 and Vivo X200: Global launch expected very soon

Vivo X200 Pro Mini: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.31", 0.2 kg
   » Oppo Find X8 and Vivo X200: Global launch expected very soon

Vivo X200 Pro: Mediatek Dimensity 9400, 6.78", 0.2 kg
   » Vivo X200 Pro: Better camera and V4 AI chip teased, X100 and X90 Pro to come with camera feature of the Vivo X100 Ultra

   » Vivo X200 Pro: Global version for Europe confirmed, 200 MP Zeiss telephoto likely to be identical to the Vivo X100 Ultra

   » Vivo X200 Pro: Early testers are impressed by the Zeiss camera, even in comparison with the Galaxy S24 Ultra and iPhone 16 Pro

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 2

Arc B 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Class 3

UHD Graphics 750
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 *

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-11-20)