Notebookcheck Logo
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)

Xiaomi 15T Pro review – an underrated gem among camera phones

Master of zoom.

The Xiaomi 15T Pro aims to stand out in its price range with its versatile camera setup and largely succeeds. It also offers many high-end features, although a few gaps remain in its specifications list.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Louise Burke (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Verdict on the Xiaomi 15T Pro

The Xiaomi 15T Pro continues the strengths of the T series, combining high performance with an impressive camera and an extremely bright display. In terms of build quality, the smartphone impresses with its solid chassis and IP68 certification, while battery life has been greatly improved thanks to the larger battery and more efficient processor.

The collaboration with Leica ensures very good photos, even if the ultra-wide angle and digital zoom still show weaknesses. On the software side, Xiaomi scores with long update periods and new AI functions, but lags behind the competition when it comes to sustainability and repairability. The slow USB 2.0 port and the lack of an LTPO panel also deserve criticism.

Pros

+ bright and accurate display
+ fast SoC
+ IP68-certified
+ fast charging with and without cable

Cons

- only USB 2.0
- weak ultra-wide-angle camera
- only 12-month warranty
- no LTPO panel

Price and availability

The Xiaomi 15T Pro can be purchased directly from the Mi Store, but it is also available from major electronics retailers such as Amazon and MediaMarkt. The smartphone launched globally in September 2025 with a starting price of around €799.99 (approximately $925 USD). Official US availability has not been announced, although the device can be found via third-party importers at comparable prices. Regional availability and warranty conditions may vary.

Amazon Logo
$7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi 15T Pro Screen Protector, 9H Hardness Anti-Scratch Tempered Glass flim,Anti-Scratch (2 +2PACK)
  • $7.29
    Anoowkoa 3 Pack Designed for Xiaomi 15T/Xiaomi 15T Pro Screen Protector Tempered glass film.Anti-Breakage.Anti-Scratch No Bubbles 9H Hardness.Easy Installation for Xiaomi 15T Pro/15T
  • $7.59
    Natbok 2+2 Pack for Xiaomi 15T/15T Pro Screen Protector with Camera Lens Protector,Full Coverage 9H Tempered Glass Film,HD Clear Scratch Resistant,Bubble-Free for Xiaomi 15T Screen Protector

The Xiaomi 15T Pro is the larger sibling of the Xiaomi 15T and the successor to the Xiaomi 14T Pro. Last year's compact flagship from Xiaomi already stood out for its capable camera setup, developed in collaboration with Leica, a partnership that continues this year. With the Pro model, Xiaomi places a stronger emphasis on an improved telephoto lens, while also offering several other advantages over the 15T.

Specifications – Xiaomi 15T Pro

Xiaomi 15T Pro (15 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ 8 x - 3.7 GHz, Cortex-X925, X4, A720
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.83 inch 19.49:9, 2772 x 1280 pixel 447 PPI, Capacitive Touchschreen, AMOLED, 480 Hz Touch Sampling Rate, Wet Touch, DC Dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
1TB UFS 4.1 Flash, 1024 GB 
, 995.2 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Electronic Compass, Flicker, Colour Temperature, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2g (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.96 x 162.7 x 77.9 ( = 0.31 x 6.41 x 3.07 in)
Battery
5500 mAh Lithium-Ion, PD 2.0 / 3.0; Battery Cycles: 1,600
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (OV Light Fusion 900, f/1.62, 23 mm, OIS) + 12 MPix (OV13b, Ultra Wide, f/2.2, 15 mm) + 50 MPix (Samung JN5, f/3.0, 115 mm, OIS); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (Samsung S5KKDS, f/2.2, 21 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, USB Cable, SIM Tool, Case, HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LHDC V5 | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5), SBAS | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | DRM: Widevine L1 | eSIM | IP68 | USB Copy Test: 22.38 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 [USB 3.2 Gen 2]); Supported file systems for external storage: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | Body SAR: 0.994 W/kg, Head SAR: 0.989 W/kg | Maximum charging speed: 90 W (wired) / 50 W (wireless), fanless, waterproof
Weight
210 g ( = 7.41 oz / 0.46 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
1000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - Xiaomi 15T Pro is IP68 certified

The Xiaomi 15T Pro is available in black, grey and mocha gold. At 210 grams, it is not particularly light and has a thickness of just under eight millimetres (measured: 8.15 mm; including camera: 11.4 mm).

Xiaomi has redesigned the look, particularly around the camera module, giving the smartphone a more premium appearance. Build quality is good, and the aluminium frame feels solid. However, the transition to the fibreglass composite back is noticeable to the touch and slightly rough. The display is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 7i.

When subjected to light torsion, the 15T Pro emits a faint creak yet maintains a solid overall impression. The SIM tray sits flush with the frame, and the smartphone is IP68 certified, ensuring dust and water resistance.

(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)

Size comparison

162.42 mm / 6.39 in 76.13 mm / 3 in 8.3 mm / 0.3268 in 206 g0.4542 lbs162.7 mm / 6.41 in 77.9 mm / 3.07 in 7.96 mm / 0.3134 in 210 g0.463 lbs160.6 mm / 6.32 in 75.59 mm / 2.98 in 8.99 mm / 0.3539 in 218 g0.4806 lbs160.4 mm / 6.31 in 75.1 mm / 2.96 in 8.39 mm / 0.3303 in 209 g0.4608 lbs160.26 mm / 6.31 in 74.95 mm / 2.95 in 8.39 mm / 0.3303 in 212 g0.4674 lbs158.4 mm / 6.24 in 75.8 mm / 2.98 in 7.3 mm / 0.2874 in 190 g0.4189 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Features – only USB 2.0 for the 15T series

The Xiaomi 15T Pro is available in three configurations:

12 GB RAM / 256 GB storage | €800 (around $870 USD)

12 GB RAM / 512 GB storage | €900 (around $980 USD)

12 GB RAM / 1 TB storage | €1,000 (around $1,090 USD)

Apart from the internal storage, there are no differences between the models. Given the price range, we would have liked to see a faster USB port, but otherwise the feature set is almost complete. There is no support for UWB, although Auracast is included.

Software – six years of updates for the 15T Pro

The Xiaomi 15T Pro originally shipped with Android 15 and HyperOS 2.0, but by the end of our testing it had already received the update to Google Android 16 with HyperOS 3.0.

The new version not only introduces design refinements but also enables easier data exchange with Apple devices, adds the Hyper Island feature, enhanced AI functions, an improved gallery search, and more.

Xiaomi promises six years of security updates and five years of major OS upgrades.

Sustainability

Xiaomi does not provide specific information regarding the smartphone's sustainability. The device comes in largely plastic-free packaging.

User repairability is not supported, and the phone can only be sent in or taken to an authorised service partner for repair.

Communication and GNSS – Xiaomi smartphone with Wi-Fi 7

The Xiaomi 15T Pro features modern connectivity modules including Wi-Fi 7 and 5G, with extensive frequency band support across all regions. Mobile reception in urban areas is strong and leaves little to be desired.

Networking
Xiaomi 15T Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
967 (min: 933) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
897 (min: 548) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1905 (min: 1867) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
919 (min: 708) MBit/s ∼54%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
987 (min: 506) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
863 (min: 749) MBit/s ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1094 (min: 655) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1154 (min: 1048) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1311 (min: 984) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1204 (min: 1187) MBit/s ∼71%
Nothing Phone (3)
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
980 (min: 492) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
834 (min: 774) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1856 (min: 1764) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1577 (min: 1279) MBit/s ∼93%
Realme GT 7
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
976 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
939 (min: 926) MBit/s ∼81%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
986 (min: 498) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
931 (min: 471) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1894 (min: 956) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1695 (min: 1643) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
944 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1093 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1293 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1446 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
719 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
746 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1355 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1402 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼83%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800185019001950Tooltip
Xiaomi 15T Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1905 (1867-1952)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1311 (984-1422)
Xiaomi 15T Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø917 (708-978)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1202 (1187-1213)
Xiaomi 15T Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø967 (933-991)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1072 (655-1214)
Xiaomi 15T Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø894 (548-929)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1153 (1048-1191)

Satellite acquisition outdoors is very fast and accurate, while indoors it takes longer but eventually settles on a precise position.

During a bike ride, we compared the Xiaomi 15T Pro with the Garmin Venu 2. At times, the smartphone's recorded track deviated slightly from the actual route, but there were no practical limitations for navigation tasks.

GNSS test route: lake circuit
GNSS test route: lake circuit
GNSS test route: city
GNSS test route: city
GNSS test route: summary
GNSS test route: summary

Telephony and call quality – with offline communication support

The Xiaomi 15T Pro supports two Nano SIM cards, one of which can be replaced with an eSIM. Features such as VoLTE and Wi-Fi calling are supported. A new addition is the offline communication function, which allows voice calls between compatible devices (currently limited to the 15T series) over distances of up to 1.9 km. However, a SIM card and Bluetooth must still be active, and the smartphone must be linked to a Mi account.

Call quality over the mobile network is very good when held to the ear, though loud ambient noise is not completely filtered out. The speaker mode also performs well, although the 15T Pro user's voice sounds slightly echoey.

Cameras – strong performance from the Xiaomi 15T Pro's setup

Selfie with the Xiaomi 15T Pro
Selfie

The high-resolution front camera of the Xiaomi 15T Pro does not use pixel binning, which results in comparatively large selfies that can reach up to 20 MB in size. However, this does not harm low-light performance, as Xiaomi refrains from excessive brightening. Under daylight conditions, the camera produces attractive photos, and videos can be recorded at up to 4K (30 fps).

The main camera was developed in co-operation with Leica and delivers good images. In close-up shots, however, care should be taken, as the automatic mode quickly switches to a bokeh mode, which can also lead to unwanted blurring. In low light, exposure times are relatively long (up to three seconds), but the results are good. The ultra-wide-angle lens (which also serves as a macro lens) shows weaknesses in both detail and edge aberrations. The zoom delivers good results but can appear somewhat artificial in the digital range.

Video recording is possible in 8K (30 fps) and Ultra HD at up to 120 fps. If you want to use all lenses, however, recording is limited to 4K/60 fps. Even in close-range video shots, we can observe a pronounced bokeh effect.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
3.4 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
2 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
2 ∆E
3 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 15T Pro: 4.05 ∆E min: 1.28 - max: 8.61 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.7 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
52.3 ∆E
53.6 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
26 ∆E
56.5 ∆E
33.3 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
48 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 15T Pro: 35.75 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 56.52 ∆E

Accessories and warranty – optional Xiaomi Care

The Xiaomi 15T Pro comes with a dark gray silicone protective case, a USB cable (Type-A to Type-C), and a SIM tool. A compatible fast charger must be purchased separately in Europe.

The warranty in Germany is only 12 months, which does not affect the dealer warranty. Optionally, the Xiaomi Care insurance package can be taken out for two years, covering accidental damage (€89 / around $95 USD) or theft (€119 / around $125 USD).

Input devices and operation – 15T Pro with fast fingerprint sensor

The capacitive touchscreen comes with a pre-applied screen protector that offers decent gliding properties but scratches easily. The glass beneath it is far more durable and feels noticeably smoother.

An optical fingerprint sensor is integrated into the display, unlocking the smartphone quickly and with a high recognition rate. Face recognition via the front camera is also available as an additional or alternative option.

The linear vibration motor provides strong yet crisp feedback and can be adjusted in the settings.

Display – extremely bright AMOLED for the Xiaomi 15T Pro

Subpixel structure
Subpixel structure

The AMOLED display of the Xiaomi 15T Pro measures 6.83 inches (17.35 cm) and offers a 1,280p resolution with a refresh rate of up to 144 Hz. However, since it is not an LTPO panel, the refresh rate can only be reduced to 60 Hz.

Brightness is exceptionally high, reaching a short-term peak of 1,889 cd/m² in full-screen white (centre of the display) before dropping to 1,064 cd/m² after less than 30 seconds. On a smaller white area (APL18), the screen maintains a steady 3,269 cd/m², while HDR video playback reaches up to 2,868 cd/m².

According to the specifications, the 15T Pro uses DC dimming. Under the oscilloscope, however, it shows like the Xiaomi 15T that it actually relies on high-frequency PWM dimming. The panel is generally easy on the eyes, although sensitive users may still experience slight discomfort.

1078
cd/m²
1065
cd/m²
1064
cd/m²
1071
cd/m²
1064
cd/m²
1072
cd/m²
1073
cd/m²
1067
cd/m²
1063
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1078 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1068.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1064 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
CCT: 6578 K
Xiaomi 15T Pro
AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Flow AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.7"
Nothing Phone (3)
AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.7"
Realme GT 7
OLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"
Xiaomi 14T Pro
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
25%
-13%
-21%
34%
17%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1064
1846
73%
1371
29%
1548
45%
1519
43%
953
-10%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1069
1850
73%
1370
28%
1535
44%
1530
43%
961
-10%
Brightness Distribution (%)
99
93
-6%
96
-3%
98
-1%
97
-2%
95
-4%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
1.2
8%
2.7
-108%
2.2
-69%
1
23%
0.9
31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.4
2.9
15%
4.2
-24%
5.5
-62%
1.7
50%
1.5
56%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2
2.3
-15%
2
-0%
3.7
-85%
1.1
45%
1.2
40%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.25 98%
2.03 108%
2.26 97%
2.22 99%
2.22 99%
CCT
6578 99%
6707 97%
6450 101%
6787 96%
6661 98%
6580 99%

* ... smaller is better

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
3269 cd/m²
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3192 cd/m² -2%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2695 cd/m² -18%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1523 cd/m² -53%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1517 cd/m² -54%
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3177 cd/m² +11%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2900 cd/m² +1%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
2868 cd/m²
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1485 cd/m² -48%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1475 cd/m² -49%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 17.15 %
Secondary Frequency: 4166 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8152 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

minimum display brightness
min.
25% display brightness
25%
50% display brightness
50%
75% display brightness
75%
maximum manual display brightness
100%

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness)

We tested the display's colour and greyscale reproduction with Calman, and the results are very good.

Grayscale (profile: Pro, colour temperature: Warm, target colour space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: Pro, colour temperature: Warm, target colour space: sRGB)
Colours (profile: Pro, colour temperature: Warm, target colour space: sRGB)
Colours (profile: Pro, colour temperature: Warm, target colour space: sRGB)
Colour space (profile: Pro, colour temperature: Warm, target colour space: sRGB)
Colour space (profile: Pro, colour temperature: Warm, target colour space: sRGB)
Saturation (profile: Pro, colour temperature: Warm, target colour space: sRGB)
Saturation (profile: Pro, colour temperature: Warm, target colour space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.546 ms rise
↘ 0.556 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.501 ms rise
↘ 0.5065 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

Outdoors, the Xiaomi 15T Pro makes an excellent impression, maintaining good legibility even in bright sunlight. Only reflections can become distracting when viewed from the side.

Viewing-angle stability is also convincing. At very shallow angles, a subtle greenish tint appears and brightness diminishes slightly.

Outdoors under a cloudy sky
Outdoors
Viewing angle stability
Viewing angle stability

Performance – Xiaomi smartphone with Dimensity 9400+

The Xiaomi 15T Pro uses a MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ paired with 12 GB of RAM, providing smooth system operation and strong overall performance.

In the benchmarks, it delivers good results but lags slightly behind other devices with the same SoC, indicating early thermal throttling.

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3136 Points +20%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2959 Points +13%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2309 Points -12%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (2478 - 2798, n=5)
2657 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
2624 Points
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2265 Points -14%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
2212 Points -16%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2187 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=213, last 2 years)
1731 Points -34%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10029 Points +29%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
8711 Points +12%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
8154 Points +5%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (7749 - 9043, n=5)
8195 Points +6%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
7749 Points
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
7439 Points -4%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
7161 Points -8%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
6972 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=213, last 2 years)
5061 Points -35%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2674793 Points +8%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (2396591 - 2841845, n=5)
2571979 Points +4%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
2483050 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2271821 Points -9%
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2147494 Points -14%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2088406 Points -16%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
1975046 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3269237, n=155, last 2 years)
1456119 Points -41%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20673 Points +22%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
19622 Points +16%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (16985 - 18344, n=4)
17710 Points +4%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
16985 Points
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
16053 Points -5%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
15928 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 28557, n=191, last 2 years)
14711 Points -13%
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
13240 Points -22%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
13223 Points +68%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
11976 Points +52%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (7887 - 12637, n=5)
11338 Points +44%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11280 Points +43%
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
10673 Points +35%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
9953 Points +26%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
7887 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14076, n=149, last 2 years)
7494 Points -5%
System
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17481 Points +75%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
16698 Points +67%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
15367 Points +54%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (9986 - 16550, n=5)
13968 Points +40%
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
12209 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=149, last 2 years)
11236 Points +13%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
11169 Points +12%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
9986 Points
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
16264 Points +108%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
13961 Points +78%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
13711 Points +75%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (7836 - 13578, n=5)
11476 Points +46%
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
11341 Points +45%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
11254 Points +44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20652, n=149, last 2 years)
8485 Points +8%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
7836 Points
Graphics
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
58323 Points +118%
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
53763 Points +101%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (26748 - 55810, n=5)
49322 Points +84%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
45691 Points +71%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
40323 Points +51%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
33672 Points +26%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
26748 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=149, last 2 years)
25088 Points -6%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2353 Points +27%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (1849 - 2267, n=5)
2138 Points +16%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2037 Points +10%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
1869 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
1849 Points
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1754 Points -5%
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1743 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=149, last 2 years)
1677 Points -9%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (1042 - 1233, n=5)
1161 Points +11%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
1042 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (81 - 5210, n=48, last 2 years)
880 Points -16%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
451 Points -57%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (8659 - 9597, n=5)
9081 Points +3%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
8818 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=48, last 2 years)
4129 Points -53%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
451 Points -95%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (11834 - 13099, n=5)
12428 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
12177 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=48, last 2 years)
5873 Points -52%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
997 Points -92%
AI Benchmark - Score V6
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
12578 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
12506 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10534 Points -16%
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
9538 Points -24%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
  (1945 - 12713, n=5)
8349 Points -33%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
7302 Points -42%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
5828 Points -53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55.6 - 22149, n=71, last 2 years)
4454 Points -64%

The Immortalis-G925 MC12 handles graphics processing, supports hardware-based ray tracing, and promises strong performance.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6885 Points +18%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6036 Points +4%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
5824 Points
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5466 Points -6%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4490 Points -23%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3866 Points -34%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7029 Points +23%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
5907 Points +4%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
5706 Points
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5300 Points -7%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4529 Points -21%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3808 Points -33%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26616 Points +19%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
22957 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
22436 Points
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18461 Points -18%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17885 Points -20%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
13588 Points -39%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12400 Points +21%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
11251 Points +9%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
10286 Points
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8357 Points -19%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8165 Points -21%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6984 Points -32%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12747 Points +16%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
11553 Points +6%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
10948 Points
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8624 Points -21%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8407 Points -23%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6932 Points -37%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2525 Points +12%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2295 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
2249 Points
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1775 Points -21%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1525 Points -32%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
1499 Points -33%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2698 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2343 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
2305 Points
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1784 Points -23%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1574 Points -32%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
1565 Points -32%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
831 fps +15%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
738 fps +2%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
725 fps
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
702 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
697 fps -4%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
585 fps -19%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps -46%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
478 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
450 fps +35%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
364 fps +9%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
334 fps
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
332 fps -1%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
221 fps -34%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
284 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
283 fps +6%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
269 fps +1%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
266 fps
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
253 fps -5%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
201 fps -24%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +35%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
108 fps +21%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
94 fps +6%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
89 fps
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -33%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -33%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
178 fps +46%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
164 fps +34%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
144 fps +18%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
143 fps +17%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
142 fps +16%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
122 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +40%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps +6%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
88 fps +2%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
86 fps
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -30%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -30%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps +34%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
94 fps +18%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
94 fps +18%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
80 fps
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79 fps -1%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
75 fps -6%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +3%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +3%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +3%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
116 fps
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -48%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -48%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
286 fps +42%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
248 fps +23%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
236 fps +17%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
208 fps +3%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
201 fps
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
187 fps -7%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +37%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
43 fps +13%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42 fps +11%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
38 fps
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps -8%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
34 fps -11%
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
334.386 Points +167%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (Chrome 134)
243.318 Points +94%
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
232.968 Points +86%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (125.3 - 272, n=3)
175.7 Points +40%
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=156, last 2 years)
152.8 Points +22%
Realme GT 7 (Chrome 137)
144.405 Points +15%
Xiaomi 15T Pro (Chrome 141)
125.306 Points
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)
77.674 Points -38%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
239 Points +119%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (Chrome 134)
163 Points +50%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (109 - 235, n=5)
160.8 Points +48%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=150, last 2 years)
144.7 Points +33%
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
137 Points +26%
Realme GT 7 (Chrome 137)
119 Points +9%
Xiaomi 15T Pro (Chrome 141)
109 Points
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)
78 Points -28%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
98817 Points +192%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (Chrome 134)
94853 Points +180%
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
71875 Points +112%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (33868 - 94555, n=5)
58165 Points +72%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=203, last 2 years)
48356 Points +43%
Realme GT 7 (Chrome 137)
46162 Points +36%
Xiaomi 15T Pro (Chrome 141)
33868 Points
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)
25646 Points -24%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)
2123.5 ms * -86%
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=158, last 2 years)
1182 ms * -4%
Xiaomi 15T Pro (Chrome 141)
1140.4 ms *
Realme GT 7 (Chrome 137)
897.5 ms * +21%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (391 - 1140, n=5)
707 ms * +38%
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
521.2 ms * +54%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
388.7 ms * +66%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (Chrome 134)
382.9 ms * +66%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi 15T ProXiaomi Poco F7 UltraSamsung Galaxy S25+Nothing Phone (3)Realme GT 7Xiaomi 14T ProAverage 1TB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
67%
51%
110%
111%
153%
71%
24%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
3219.93
4002.68
24%
4057.35
26%
3720.79
16%
3849.12
20%
3687.54
15%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
3593.03
3464.43
-4%
3311.02
-8%
3270.73
-9%
3442.58
-4%
3908.34
9%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
426.1
311.24
-27%
294.51
-31%
438.57
3%
444.28
4%
441.21
4%
344 ?(58.8 - 548, n=3)
-19%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
110.46
411.78
273%
351.16
218%
585.11
430%
578.79
424%
752.87
582%

Emissions – smartphone with dual speakers

Temperature

Surface temperatures can reach up to 48.5 °C under sustained load. However, since the hotspot is located next to the camera, this never becomes uncomfortable in everyday use.

The SoC does throttle noticeably, although this is rarely perceptible in practice.

Max. Load
 44.9 °C
113 F
45.3 °C
114 F
44.4 °C
112 F
 
 45.6 °C
114 F
45.4 °C
114 F
43.5 °C
110 F
 
 45.9 °C
115 F
45.8 °C
114 F
43.8 °C
111 F
 
Maximum: 45.9 °C = 115 F
Average: 45 °C = 113 F
41.8 °C
107 F
43.8 °C
111 F
43.6 °C
110 F
40.4 °C
105 F
44.5 °C
112 F
48.5 °C
119 F
40 °C
104 F
44.4 °C
112 F
46.2 °C
115 F
Maximum: 48.5 °C = 119 F
Average: 43.7 °C = 111 F
Room Temperature 21.6 °C = 71 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.5 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Stress Tests

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.5 % +40%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
70.9 %
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
64.6 % -9%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63.8 % -10%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 % -17%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.4 % -25%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
73.3 %
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
70.1 % -4%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 % -6%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65.9 % -10%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61.9 % -16%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51.3 % -30%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.1 % +29%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77.2 % 0%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
77 %
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
74.5 % -3%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
69.6 % -10%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.9 % -24%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.3 % +45%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
79.3 % +16%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
70.8 % +3%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
68.5 %
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.5 % -3%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.9 % -15%
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø24.1 (21.9-29.9)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø23.5 (19.9-38.9)
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø69.9 (62.5-88.1)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø84.2 (71.3-133.4)
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø23.6 (21.6-28.1)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø24.9 (21.4-36.3)
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø10.6 (9.35-13.6)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12 (10.9-16.3)

Speakers

The two speakers of the Xiaomi 15T Pro can get quite loud, though the sound becomes somewhat tinny at higher volumes. At lower levels, the phone delivers a more balanced audio profile.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.939.12535.435.73127.536.74028.440.85029.8456323.237.78019.543.310019.442.112520.144.616017.651.420018.453.625015.557.231512.762.340011.462.150012.968.263011.770.180011.374.9100012.280.2125013.181.4160015.178.6200013.181.325001380.6315013.381.7400013.382.4500013.382.6630013.680.7800013.677.21000013.675.21250013.769.7160001468.6SPL25.492N0.791.6median 13.3median 75.2Delta1.19.438.437.830.633.919.23521.534.336.939.124.43319.739.715.840.914.144.615.255.612.455.29.560.19.762.310.563.49669.869.38.974.49.477.211.580.911.278.11281.611.780.71279.61282.112.580.312.977.313.371.413.567.713.568.413.664.123.990.90.584median 12median 71.41.59.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 15T ProSamsung Galaxy S25+
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 15T Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S25+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery life – smartphone with 5,500 mAh

Power consumption

Power efficiency has improved compared with the predecessor, and the battery capacity has increased to 5,500 mAh.

Wired charging is supported at up to 90 watts. Using a compatible power adapter, a full charge takes just 37 minutes (50% in 15 minutes, 80% in 27 minutes).

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.13 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.83 / 1.06 / 1.09 Watt
Load midlight 5.93 / 11.32 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi 15T Pro
5500 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
5300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S25+
4900 mAh
Nothing Phone (3)
5150 mAh
Realme GT 7
7000 mAh
Xiaomi 14T Pro
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-12%
-30%
25%
2%
-14%
-163%
-21%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
0.83
0.89
-7%
0.45
46%
0.4
52%
0.8
4%
0.95
-14%
2.21 ?(0.83 - 3.9, n=5)
-166%
Idle Average * (Watt)
1.06
1.19
-12%
1.09
-3%
0.7
34%
0.93
12%
1.2
-13%
4.02 ?(1.06 - 6.31, n=5)
-279%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
1.09
1.22
-12%
1.13
-4%
1.21
-11%
1.19
-9%
1.27
-17%
4.17 ?(1.09 - 6.35, n=5)
-283%
Load Average * (Watt)
5.93
8.76
-48%
14.41
-143%
5.95
-0%
10.2 ?(5.93 - 12.5, n=5)
-72%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
11.32
9.3
18%
16.37
-45%
14.02
-24%
13.2 ?(11.1 - 15.8, n=5)
-17%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.21 (1.001-11.4)
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.29 (0.962-16.7)
Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.778 (0.732-0.987)
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.789 (0.745-1.044)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.4 (9.7-11.2)
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø13.6 (12.6-14.7)
Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.778 (0.732-0.987)
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.789 (0.745-1.044)

Battery life

The combination of improved efficiency and a larger battery also results in longer runtimes. In our practical Wi-Fi test, the Xiaomi 15T Pro achieved almost 21 hours.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 141)
20h 54min
Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi 15T Pro
5500 mAh
20.9 h
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
5300 mAh
18.4 h
Samsung Galaxy S25+
4900 mAh
19.8 h
Nothing Phone (3)
5150 mAh
18.4 h
Realme GT 7
7000 mAh
23.8 h
Xiaomi 14T Pro
5000 mAh
18.7 h

Notebookcheck overall rating

In review: Xiaomi 15T Pro
In review: Xiaomi 15T Pro

The Xiaomi 15T Pro impresses with a strong camera, brilliant display, and long battery life, but falls short of its full flagship potential due to the lack of LTPO, a slow USB port, and limited repairability.

Xiaomi 15T Pro - 11/06/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
55 / 69 → 80%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
91%
Games Performance
43 / 55 → 79%
Application Performance
72 / 85 → 85%
AI Performance
75%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 87%
Camera
85%
Average
72%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
97.7%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
94.5%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 57.9%

Alternatives at a glance

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
86.1%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
Amazon:
1. $7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi 15T Pro S...
2. $7.29
Anoowkoa 3 Pack Designed for...
3. $7.59
Natbok 2+2 Pack for Xiaomi 1...
List Price: 1000€
210 g1TB UFS 4.1 Flash6.83"
2772x1280
447 PPI
AMOLED
2.
85.3%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $579.99
XIAOMI Poco F7 PRO 5G + 4G L...
2. $10.79
Ibywind For Xiaomi Poco F7 U...
3. $7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco F7 P...
List Price: 800€
212 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.67"
3200x1440
526 PPI
Flow AMOLED
3.
88.4%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $7.98
firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree...
2. $7.98
firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree...
3. $17.99
SPIDERCASE Magnetic for Sams...
List Price: 1149 Euro
190 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"
3120x1440
513 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
4.
84.8%
Nothing Phone (3)
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 825 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon: $764.00
List Price: 899 Euro
218 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2800x1260
460 PPI
AMOLED
5.
83.2%
Realme GT 7
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $8.99
Suttkue for Realme GT 7 Scre...
2. $10.79
Ibywind For Realme GT 7/GT 7...
3. $7.99
Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ...
206 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"
2780x1264
450 PPI
OLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Xiaomi 15T Pro review – an underrated gem among camera phones
Daniel Schmidt, 2025-11- 9 (Update: 2025-11- 9)