Notebookcheck Logo
Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

Xiaomi 15 Pro review - One of the most efficient flagship smartphones thanks to a special display

Cooling makes all the difference.

Buyers of a Xiaomi 15 Pro can look forward to the best smartphone hardware in the shape of a Snapdragon 8 Elite, a huge silicon-carbon battery, and Leica Summilux cameras. The Xiaomi phone additionally has an extremely attractive price tag—but this comes with a catch.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
5G Touchscreen Smartphone

Verdict on the Xiaomi 15 Pro

In this modern era of the smartphone, efficiency is becoming increasingly important and in the future, this may well become a deciding factor in order to use resources optimally. In this context, efficiency means that a cell phone performs its tasks reliably without consuming unnecessary energy.

Xiaomi has also identified this as a sales strategy for its 15 Pro. In addition to its high-performance and very efficient 3nm chipset from Qualcomm, the Chinese manufacturer's latest flagship uses a particularly energy-saving, yet extremely bright OLED panel. We cannot clarify in detail to what extent the new display of the Xiaomi 15 Pro played a role in our consumption measurement, but the high-end phone is certainly very efficient as an overall package. Competitors, such as the Nubia Z70 Ultra, sometimes consume more than twice as much energy.

The Xiaomi flagship additionally performs better than the competition, such as the Oppo Find X8 Pro, when it comes to cooling and consistency. Although the Snapdragon 8 Elite is throttled moderately, the 15 Pro is far from having its performance halved, as is the case with the OnePlus 13.

We see some room for improvement concerning its installed cameras. Photos taken on the Xiaomi phone are by no means bad, but the 15 Pro can't quite come close to the level of a Vivo X200 Pro. Chinese manufacturers, like Xiaomi, also need to improve on their transparency. Anyone considering importing the 15 Pro should also take into account the restrictions of the Chinese software (limited languages, no Android Auto, etc.).

Pros

+ super bright LTPO panel
+ great stamina
+ high-quality appearance
+ extensive connectivity
+ enormous performance ...

Cons

- ... with moderate SoC throttling
- high waste heat
- only available as an import device
- transparency deficits
- no eSIM option

Price and availability

In China, the Xiaomi phone has an MRSP of 5,299 Yuan (approx. $726). You can import the phone via our partner Trading Shenzhen for $839.74.

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
89.9%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
Amazon:
1. $9.29
Anbzsign (2+2 Pack for Xiaom...
2. $69.99
Xiaomi Redmi Smart Band Pro,...
3. $37.98
WIXLI 10000mAh Portable Char...
List Price: 810€
213 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"
3200x1440
521 PPI
AMOLED
2.
87.6%
OnePlus 13
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $14.58
WILLONE 2+2 Pcs For OnePlus ...
2. $14.99
2+2 Pcs Screen Protector One...
3. $8.99
Suttkue for OnePlus 13 Scree...
List Price: 720€
213 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"
3168x1440
510 PPI
AMOLED
3.
86.7%
Vivo X200 Pro
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘
15 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $11.99
MAOUICI Glass for Vivo X200 ...
2. $15.99
AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr...
3. $12.98
Puccy 2 Pack Camera Lens Pro...
List Price: 850€
223 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"
2800x1260
453 PPI
OLED
4.
89.8% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon: $769.11
List Price: 1149€
196 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"
3120x1440
513 PPI
AMOLED
5.
85.7%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
1. $849.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro - Unlocke...
2. $1,499.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - Un...
3. $649.00
Google Pixel 9 - Unlocked An...
199 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.30"
2856x1280
495 PPI
OLED
6.
89.4% v7 (old)
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $9.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi 14 Pro 5G...
2. $9.99
for Xiaomi 14T Pro Screen Pr...
3. $15.99
AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr...
List Price: 790€
223 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"
3200x1440
521 PPI
AMOLED

In addition to the Xiaomi 15 that we have already tested, the technology giant from the Far East has unveiled its latest flagship phone, the Xiaomi 15 Pro. The high-end smartphone has some similarities to its more compact sister model—for example, its Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and selection of Leica cameras—but according to Xiaomi, it also boasts a special LTPO AMOLED display. With the same brightness, it should consume significantly less energy compared to the displays of most competitors. Moreover, it features a large 6,100 mAh battery with a silicon-carbon-based anode.

Like the Xiaomi 14 series, the Xiaomi 15 series will most likely not be available to purchase in the United States. You can still import the phone from certain retailers, however.

The Xiaomi 15 Pro's specifications

Xiaomi 15 Pro (15 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
Display
6.73 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 521 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash, 1024 GB 
, 972 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB Type C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer, color spectrum, OTG, Miracast
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 5G:n1 / n2 / n3 / n5 / n7 / n8 / n12 / n20 / n26 / n28 / n38 / n40 / n41 / n48 / n66 / n77 / n78 / n79 / n80 / n81 / n83 / n84 / n89; 4G:FDD-LTE:B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B12 / B17 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B26 / B28 / B66, TDD-LTE:B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 / B42 / B48 / B41; 3G:B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19; 2G: B2 / B3 / B5 / B8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.7 x 161.3 x 75.3 ( = 0.34 x 6.35 x 2.96 in)
Battery
6100 mAh Silicon-Carbon
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.4, 23 mm, OIS, 1/1,31 inch) + 50 MPix (5x optical zoom, f/2.5, 120 mm, OIS, tele) + 50 MPix (f/2.2, 14 mm, ultrawide)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.0, 22 mm, FF)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, case, charger, USB cable, HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, widevine L1, IP68; GPS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (G1), Galileo (E1, E5a), Beidou (B1, B1c, B2a), QZSS (L1, L5), fanless, waterproof
Weight
213 g ( = 7.51 oz / 0.47 pounds), Power Supply: 95 g ( = 3.35 oz / 0.21 pounds)
Price
810 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - The Xiaomi phone is waterproof

The Xiaomi 15 Pro's case uses high-quality materials and boasts an excellent build quality. The back, as well as the front, are made of the company's own second-generation Dragon Crystal Glass or Xiaomi Shield Glass (international name). This should make the flagship phone even more impact-resistant. An aluminum frame rounds off the exterior of the Xiaomi 15 Pro, merging seamlessly with the glass material. This makes the case feel super nice and homogeneous in your hand.

Overall, the device's design looks modern thanks to its thin display bezels and efficient front-to-surface ratio. With a case thickness of 8.5 mm and a weight of 213 grams, the Xiaomi phone isn't terribly bulky despite its massive battery.

Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone
Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone
Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone
Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone

Color selection of the Xiaomi 15 Pro (image source: Xiaomi China) 

The Xiaomi 15 Pro is available in four colorways, including two more classic variants (white, gray) and two more unusual versions (silver, green). Each color has a matte finish that only shows fingerprint marks slightly. The case is certified according to the IP68 standard, which means that the design is dustproof and waterproof and will not be damaged even if you take the phone out during a rain shower. In addition, the back camera module comes with a ceramic lens, which, according to the manufacturer, is highly wear-resistant.

Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone (image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone (image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone (image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

Size comparison

162.9 mm / 6.41 in 76.5 mm / 3.01 in 8.5 mm / 0.3346 in 213 g0.4696 lbs162.36 mm / 6.39 in 75.95 mm / 2.99 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 223 g0.4916 lbs161.3 mm / 6.35 in 75.3 mm / 2.96 in 8.7 mm / 0.3425 in 213 g0.4696 lbs161.4 mm / 6.35 in 75.3 mm / 2.96 in 8.49 mm / 0.3343 in 223 g0.4916 lbs158.5 mm / 6.24 in 75.9 mm / 2.99 in 7.7 mm / 0.3031 in 196 g0.4321 lbs152.8 mm / 6.02 in 72 mm / 2.83 in 8.5 mm / 0.3346 in 199 g0.4387 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Connectivity - The Xiaomi 15 Pro with a speedy USB port

The available memory/storage variants of the current Xiaomi flagship—which use LPDDR5X and UFS 4.0 respectively—as well as the corresponding prices have barely changed compared to the predecessor model. While the base model only comes with 12 GB RAM, the top version has 16 GB RAM. However, Xiaomi doesn't offer a 24 GB version, like with the OnePlus 13.

Sensitive user information, such as biometric data and passwords, is protected by a dedicated, in-house chipset on the smartphone, which, according to the manufacturer, provides enhanced protection against unauthorized access by malware.

There are no real changes to its connectivity compared to the 14 Pro: Bluetooth 5.4, an NFC chip and Miracast as well as an IR blaster are all available. USB OTG, wired image output, and a fast USB port are also on board, which works with the 3.2 standard (Gen. 2) according to the phone's specifications. However, the 13 Pro's UWB chip is once again missing from the 2024 model.

Left case side
Left case side
Right case side (buttons: on/off, volume)
Right case side (buttons: on/off, volume)
Bottom case side (speaker, USB port, microphone, SIM slot)
Bottom case side (speaker, USB port, microphone, SIM slot)
Top case side
Top case side

Software - The Xiaomi phone comes with Android 15

The Xiaomi 15 Pro comes with the manufacturer's own second-generation HyperOS including a Play Protect certification. As Chinese versions of its products don't support Google services straight out of the box, Chinese services and Xiaomi's own services are used. However, unlike on Huawei smartphones, you don't have to go without Google services. The Google frameworks are already pre-installed in the phone's delivered state, so you'll only have to install the PlayStore manually via the in-house app store. Unfortunately, apart from Chinese and English, no other language pack can be selected. In the near future, however, the xiaomi.eu ROM will probably also be available to flash for the Pro version.

Xiaomi has only published information regarding software updates for the Chinese market. The current Xiaomi 14 generation is supplied with four years of Android upgrades and five years of security patches. Whether this also applies to the 15 Pro, which will probably only be available in China, remains to be seen.

At the time of testing, the Xiaomi phone's latest security patch was from December 2024. The speed at which these updates are rolled out is usually good with the Chinese ROM—but Xiaomi is unlikely to operate at the monthly level of Google or Samsung.

Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone
Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone
Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone
Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone

Sustainability

The 15 Pro's packaging appears to be free of plastic, but the device itself is wrapped in foil. The rest of the packaging is made of cardboard.

Xiaomi hasn't provided any precise information on the materials used and their recycling rate for its 15 series, but the manufacturer does state that it is increasing the use of recycled materials, including aluminum, gold and copper, for all smartphones. Its use of bio-based high-polymer materials in smartphones and accessories as well as recycled plastic from discarded fishing nets is also intended to minimize its ecological footprint. Detailed information will probably only be provided in the sustainability report for the global models.

Communication and GNSS - The Xiaomi 15 Pro uses dual GPS

Within your home network, the Xiaomi 15 Pro uses the modern WiFi 7 standard including MU-MIMO support, but according to the datasheet, it only uses the 2.4 and 5 GHz range to establish a connection. In our test, however, the 6 GHz band was also recognized and we measured great transfer rates of almost over 1,500 MBit/s when receiving in combination with the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000. However, its sending rates weren't the best and suffered quite a few fluctuations.

Unfortunately, we can't fully make use of WiFi 7 during our measurements, even when using the 6 GHz band. The reason for this is that suitable routers (especially with a 10 GBit LAN port) are still hard to find.

For accessing the web on the go, the flagship cell phone can use the 5G network at best and supports a wide range of frequencies—the same applies to the LTE standard. Even bands 20 and 28 are already on board the Chinese version. According to Xiaomi, the integrated modem uses artificial intelligence to always select the best possible antennas depending on how the smartphone is held. However, we don't see it as a true "world phone", as the manufacturer calls it, with its 22 supported LTE bands.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
1830 (1666min - 1889max) MBit/s +124%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
1728 (1374min - 1860max) MBit/s +112%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Wi-Fi 6E
1581 (1247min - 1658max) MBit/s +94%
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (563 - 1945, n=39)
1538 MBit/s +88%
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1945, n=80, last 2 years)
1428 MBit/s +75%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
816 (564min - 966max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
1731 (1657min - 1754max) MBit/s +14%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
1602 (1387min - 1829max) MBit/s +5%
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (892 - 1864, n=39)
1552 MBit/s +2%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
1520 (1364min - 1602max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (668 - 1864, n=80, last 2 years)
1381 MBit/s -9%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Wi-Fi 6E
1117 (1031min - 1173max) MBit/s -27%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600Tooltip
Xiaomi 15 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø816 (564-966)
Xiaomi 15 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1520 (1364-1602)
Vivo X200 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø944 (462-1020)
Vivo X200 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø966 (769-1014)
Location services indoors
Location services indoors
Location services outside
Location services outside

During our practical test, the Xiaomi phone boasted good locating abilities. However, we wouldn't have expected larger deviations from a smartphone with dual GNSS support. The Xiaomi 15 Pro accurately displayed the distance we traveled. Our Garmin Venu 2, which we used for comparison purposes, showed a very similar route. During everyday use, the Xiaomi phone's accuracy is more than sufficient for navigation tasks.

All the main satellite systems are used for its location services: Beidou (B1I + B1C+ B2a), GPS (L1+L5), Galileo (E1+E5) and GLONASS (G1) as well as QZSS (L1 + L5) with a high accuracy of 3 meters.

Garmin Venu 2
Garmin Venu 2
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Xiaomi 15 Pro

Telephone functions and call quality - The Xiaomi smartphone with dual SIM support

Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone
Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone

The Xiaomi 15 Pro's call quality is consistently good and the high-end smartphone does well during mobile calls in both loud and quiet environments. Voices are transmitted clearly and without distortion, and noise is effectively suppressed to ensure good intelligibility even in loud environments.

The Xiaomi 15 Pro features full dual SIM support with two nano SIM card slots using the 5G network. There is no option to integrate an eSIM into the system in the system settings of the Chinese version.

Cameras - The Xiaomi 15 Pro uses the Light Fusion 900

Selfie on the Xiaomi 15 Pro
Selfie on the Xiaomi 15 Pro

The 32-MPix camera on the front of the Xiaomi 15 Pro doesn't use pixel binning or autofocus. Nevertheless, the flagship phone takes good selfies with decent sharpness but images have a tendency to be overexposed. The Snapdragon 8 Elite smartphone also cuts a fine figure when recording videos thanks to its 4K60 support.

To put it positively, Xiaomi hasn't experimented with its main camera and has gone for the same sensor as the 14 Pro. The Light Hunter 900 was developed in cooperation with Leica and has a native resolution of 50 MPix, which is usually merged into 12.5 MPix photos and superpixels using 4-to-1 binning. The 1/1.31-inch-format sensor offers a beautiful depth of detail and accurate focusing as well as a very high shooting speed. However, the variable aperture control of its predecessor is now nowhere to be seen—for whatever reason. Thanks to its large f/1.44 aperture and optical stabilization, you can still take impressive shots in low light.

0.6x
0.6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
5x
5x
10x
10x
20x
20x
120x (max)
120x (max)

Similarly, nothing has changed when it comes to its ultra-wide-angle lens. The 50 MPix sensor with a focal length of 14 mm (35 mm equivalent) delivers solid to good image quality for this price range. Its focus works up to a minimum distance of five centimeters for super macro shots.

New, on the other hand, is the 120 mm Leica periscope lens based on the Sony IMX858—also with a resolution of 50 MPix and OIS. The telephoto lens with a fivefold, lossless zoom delivers good sharpness up to 10x including lots of details. In combination with the digital "AI Zoom", the Xiaomi 15 Pro enables solid zoom shots up to 20x.

Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone
Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone
Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone
Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone
Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone

The Xiaomi 15 Pro also has a lot to offer when it comes to video recording. Moving images support Dolby Vision and HDR10+ and can be recorded with up to a very high 8K resolution (30 fps) or alternatively in UHD quality at up to 60 frames per second. A Pro video mode is additionally on board.

The main camera stabilizes videos well, but it isn't possible to change lenses while recording. This is a bit of a shame, as exposure and white balance hardly vary between the cameras.

Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone
Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone
Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone
Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow lightUltra-wide angle
orginal image
click to load images

In controlled lighting conditions, we analyzed the main camera's color reproduction in comparison to the actual reference colors. The 50 MP lens revealed some brightening and oversaturation when depicting the ColorChecker Passport, especially in the green and blue tones, and the Xiaomi 15 Pro did have some outliers in color fidelity (>10).

ColorChecker
5.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
3 ∆E
6 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 15 Pro: 7.81 ∆E min: 2.52 - max: 17.22 ∆E
ColorChecker
22.3 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
33 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 15 Pro: 20.81 ∆E min: 12.08 - max: 33 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - The Xiaomi phone comes with a power supply

The Xiaomi 15 Pro's power supply
The Xiaomi 15 Pro's power supply

The phone's scope of delivery includes a 90-watt fast-charging power adapter, a protective cover, a data or charging cable (USB-A to USB-C), a SIM pin and a quick start guide. A protective film comes pre-installed on the screen. Our loaner Trading Shenzhen added an EU adapter for the charger and a USB OTG adapter to the scope of delivery of our China version.

Our imported device comes with a 12-month warranty. In the event of a warranty claim, Trading Shenzhen offers the option of sending the smartphone to a German shipping address.

Input devices & operation - The Xiaomi phone with a new ultrasonic sensor

The position of the buttons is ergonomically placed and their good pressure points allow for precise operation. Inputs on the 6.73-inch AMOLED display are also recognized accurately. Thanks to its high refresh rate of up to 120 Hz, the flagship cell phone runs smoothly during everyday use and animations look nice. Thanks to its sampling rate of up to 300 Hz, the panel also reacts quickly to touch.

A new ultrasonic sensor is available for biometric unlocking using your fingerprint. The Xiaomi phone reliably unlocked the display during our test and we never had to wait long. You can also use less-secure 2D facial recognition using the front-facing camera.

Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone
Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone
Test Xiaomi 15 Pro Smartphone

Display - The Xiaomi 15 Pro is said to be particularly energy-efficient

The OLED display is based on an RG/BG sub-pixel matrix consisting of one red, one blue and one green LED
The OLED display is based on an RG/BG sub-pixel matrix consisting of one red, one blue and one green LED

Xiaomi has installed an LTPO AMOLED panel with a high 1,440p resolution into its latest flagship. According to the manufacturer, the M9 material used ensures a very high light yield and therefore reduces power consumption with the same brightness as the competition. It also has a triple certification by TÜV Rheinland (flicker-free, low blue light content, "circadian-friendly").

The panel can dynamically adjust its frame rate between 1 Hz and 120 Hz and features a peak brightness of 3,200 nits according to the datasheet. Fortunately, this value was even exceeded during the APL18 test which is relevant for everyday use, and we measured 3,526 cd/m²—whereby a slightly higher brightness is often possible with HDR content on smartphones. But even so, video content with a high dynamic range is displayed super nicely, and it supports lots of standards (HDR 10+, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HLG).

1025
cd/m²
1016
cd/m²
1008
cd/m²
1012
cd/m²
1016
cd/m²
1018
cd/m²
1031
cd/m²
1022
cd/m²
1007
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1031 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1017.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.95 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1016 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.15 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
Xiaomi 15 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
OnePlus 13
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"
Vivo X200 Pro
OLED, 2800x1260, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy S24+
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"
Google Pixel 9 Pro
OLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"
Xiaomi 14 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Screen
18%
49%
-26%
52%
1%
Brightness middle
1016
1155
14%
1828
80%
1358
34%
2083
105%
1025
1%
Brightness
1017
1155
14%
1828
80%
1358
34%
2016
98%
1046
3%
Brightness Distribution
98
98
0%
94
-4%
92
-6%
84
-14%
95
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.15
1
13%
0.7
39%
3
-161%
0.7
39%
1.1
4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.57
1.8
50%
1.6
55%
4.4
-23%
2
44%
2.9
19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.9
1.6
16%
1.1
42%
2.5
-32%
1.1
42%
2.2
-16%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.3 96%
2.25 98%
1.98 111%
2.22 99%
2.25 98%
CCT
6677 97%
6503 100%
6520 100%
6656 98%
6560 99%
6622 98%

* ... smaller is better

As is typical for OLEDs, the phone uses PWM modulation to control the brightness of its screen, which shows itself as a flickering screen. We couldn't confirm the high frequency (1,920 Hz) stated in its datasheet—our display measurement resulted in around 407 Hz. However, the visually perceptible fluctuations in brightness should be easy on the eyes, even for sensitive users, as the amplitude curve was very even during our measurements using an oscilloscope, and the modulation depth was extremely flat at just 7 percent.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 119.5 Hz
Amplitude: 7 %

The display backlight flickers at 119.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 119.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8684 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

100% brightness
100% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
minimum brightness
minimum brightness

Measurement series with fixed zoom setting

The setting options for the screen's color display are extensive. Three color profiles and an "Advanced" mode are available, in which both the color temperature and individual parameters, such as saturation or color space, can be set.

We examined the deviations in the color calibration using the Calman analysis software. Using the "Pro" profile, the differences in the individual colors are barely noticeable. Our measured DeltaE values indicate a very low deviation in the colors and greyscale.

Color accuracy (profile: professional, warm, target color space: sRGB)
Color accuracy (profile: professional, warm, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: professional, warm, target color space: Adobe RGB)
Color space (profile: professional, warm, target color space: Adobe RGB)
Color space (profile: professional, warm, target color space: P3)
Color space (profile: professional, warm, target color space: P3)
Color space (profile: professional, warm, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: professional, warm, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: professional, warm, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: professional, warm, target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (profile: professional, warm, target color space: sRGB)
Color saturation (profile: professional, warm, target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Outside, the Xiaomi 15 Pro makes a very strong impression. Even in direct sunlight in the summer, display content should remain perfectly visible. We also have nothing to complain about when it comes to its viewing-angle stability. Even when viewed from very flat angles, the OLED panel's colors stay stable.

Performance - The Xiaomi phone with the Snapdragon 8 Elite

If you want the best chipset currently available in a smartphone, then the Xiaomi 15 Pro is for you. With its Oryon performance cores and peak clock rate of 4.32 GHz, the Snapdragon 8 Elite offers plenty of power, relegating even an Apple A18 Pro to the back of the pack during the Geekbench multi-core test. But even the Dimensity 9400 inside the X200 Pro was clearly beaten during the single-core test, which illustrates its high performance. However, AI benchmarks are not the Qualcomm SoC's strong point.

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (3001 - 3228, n=7)
3116 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3089 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3087 Points 0%
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
2748 Points -11%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2278 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
2066 Points -33%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1971 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=179, last 2 years)
1482 Points -52%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (9019 - 10401, n=7)
9620 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9404 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9369 Points 0%
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
8574 Points -9%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6875 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
6534 Points -31%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4820 Points -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=179, last 2 years)
4163 Points -56%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2173 - 2258, n=5)
2213 Points +1%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2192 Points 0%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2189 Points
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
1998 Points -9%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1687 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1567 Points -28%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1372 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=175, last 2 years)
1035 Points -53%
Multi-Core
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
8126 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (6789 - 8816, n=5)
7787 Points +3%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
7570 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
6789 Points -10%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6439 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
5871 Points -22%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
3787 Points -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=175, last 2 years)
3459 Points -54%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2762122 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2474369 - 3015111, n=7)
2718796 Points +4%
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
2705165 Points +4%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2611586 Points
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1905751 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1777871 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=112, last 2 years)
1298428 Points -50%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1139380 Points -56%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (18231 - 27169, n=7)
22281 Points +22%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
19793 Points +9%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
18231 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
17534 Points -4%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
15876 Points -13%
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
15849 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13228 Points -27%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
11823 Points -35%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2674 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2485 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1718 - 2674, n=6)
2212 Points -17%
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
1663 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1290 Points -52%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1167 Points -56%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1021 Points -62%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=165, last 2 years)
928 Points -65%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
12594 Points +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (9067 - 13729, n=6)
11406 Points +26%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
10937 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
9467 Points +4%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9067 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
7716 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 13729, n=159, last 2 years)
6461 Points -29%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points -100%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (14039 - 19891, n=6)
16507 Points +10%
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
16162 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
15253 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
14976 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
14039 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 19891, n=159, last 2 years)
10311 Points -31%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
8029 Points -46%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (7873 - 18911, n=6)
13872 Points +76%
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
13673 Points +74%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11536 Points +47%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
10197 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
10178 Points +29%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
7873 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=159, last 2 years)
7030 Points -11%
Graphics
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
51898 Points +18%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
44154 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
43637 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (35527 - 51041, n=6)
42856 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
25796 Points -42%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
23041 Points -48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=159, last 2 years)
17931 Points -59%
Web
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
2183 Points +71%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2091 Points +64%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1998 Points +56%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1879 Points +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1202 - 2363, n=6)
1818 Points +42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=159, last 2 years)
1572 Points +23%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1278 Points
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
81594 Points +284%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
36578 Points +72%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
22767 Points +7%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
21254 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8865 - 22767, n=6)
18493 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17686 Points -17%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
16988 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
11342 Points -47%
AImark - Score v3.x
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
52884 Points +2561%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1790 - 307528, n=7)
45564 Points +2193%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25263 Points +1171%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1987 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1982 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1146 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1121 Points -44%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
13084 Points +671%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1698 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=18, last 2 years)
1603 Points -6%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1375 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (761 - 1698, n=5)
1295 Points -24%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
9453 Points +1220%
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=18, last 2 years)
907 Points +27%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
716 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
654 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (303 - 716, n=5)
565 Points -21%
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
1501 Points +108%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
722 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
689 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (311 - 722, n=5)
578 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 1501, n=18, last 2 years)
424 Points -41%
AI Benchmark - Score V6
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
10739 Points
Vivo X200 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
9873 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (302 - 10742, n=6)
4046 Points -62%
Average of class Smartphone
  (177 - 10742, n=19, last 2 years)
3019 Points -72%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1112 Points -90%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
734 Points -93%

An integrated Adreno 830 is responsible for graphics calculations inside the phone, and it didn't have to fear anyone during the benchmarks. It clearly outperformed an Immortalis G925 during the demanding tier tests, and you can even expect almost 50 frames per second with a high 4K resolution. However, the OnePlus 13 managed to get even more frames per second out of the Snapdragon 8 Elite during GFXBench.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6789 Points +4%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6521 Points
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6417 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4235 Points -35%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2605 Points -60%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6754 Points +3%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6567 Points
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6432 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4256 Points -35%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2547 Points -61%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25785 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
25431 Points
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
22987 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13098 Points -48%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9476 Points -63%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11821 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
11654 Points
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11476 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8774 Points -25%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11879 Points +3%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
11589 Points
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11504 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8765 Points -24%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
2602 Points
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2567 Points -1%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2509 Points -4%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1026 Points -61%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2599 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
2576 Points
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2495 Points -3%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1001 Points -61%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
791 fps +4%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
768 fps +1%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
763 fps
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
543 fps -29%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
415 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
378 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
502 fps +19%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
498 fps +18%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
423 fps
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
362 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
310 fps -27%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
245 fps -42%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps -13%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
365 fps +19%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
354 fps +15%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
308 fps
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
269 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
244 fps -21%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
165 fps -46%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps -43%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -55%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps +2%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
209 fps
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
188 fps -10%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
159 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
139 fps -33%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps -59%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +13%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps -36%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -43%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps -56%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
129 fps +15%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps +3%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
112 fps
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75 fps -33%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps -31%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps -36%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
321 fps +16%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
299 fps +8%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
276 fps
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
209 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
176 fps -36%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -57%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps +10%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +8%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
48 fps
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
34 fps -29%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -58%

The Xiaomi phone performs well in terms of browser speed and its benchmark results were very good. Websites are opened quickly during everyday use and can be scrolled through smoothly.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)
276.321 Points
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
238.78 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (89.7 - 289, n=8)
236 Points -15%
Vivo X200 Pro
234 Points -15%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
162.564 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
139.087 Points -50%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
126 Points -54%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
108.429 Points -61%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
31.6 runs/min +9%
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)
28.9 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (23.5 - 34, n=7)
27.7 runs/min -4%
Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131)
17.7 runs/min -39%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
15.8 runs/min -45%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=71, last 2 years)
12.1 runs/min -58%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)
255 Points
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
235 Points -8%
Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131)
225 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (168 - 255, n=6)
209 Points -18%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
181 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
176 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
118.6 Points -53%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
106 Points -58%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
92054 Points +9%
Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131)
86943 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (72825 - 94399, n=7)
86336 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)
84676 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
63452 Points -25%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
60566 Points -28%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
54365 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=211, last 2 years)
38768 Points -54%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1512 ms * -257%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
801.6 ms * -89%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
699 ms * -65%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
630.8 ms * -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (422 - 574, n=7)
453 ms * -7%
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
432.7 ms * -2%
Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131)
431.56 ms * -2%
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)
423.11 ms *

* ... smaller is better

When it comes to storage speed, the phone's UFS 4.0 storage delivers outstanding performance. Its AndroBench values were particularly good when writing and reading small data blocks.

Xiaomi 15 ProOnePlus 13Vivo X200 ProSamsung Galaxy S24+Google Pixel 9 ProAverage 1 TB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
-20%
-43%
-63%
-4%
-47%
Sequential Read 256KB
3998.65
3984.23
0%
2694.85
-33%
2450.9
-39%
1717.9
-57%
Sequential Write 256KB
3673.38
3684.36
0%
2174.26
-41%
1523.87
-59%
253.53
-93%
Random Read 4KB
409.67
301.29
-26%
317.29
-23%
387.42
-5%
218.41
-47%
Random Write 4KB
555.55
344.63
-38%
658.43
19%
176.19
-68%
261.55
-53%

Games - The Xiaomi 15 Pro only manages 90 frames per second

Let's take a look at whether the Adreno GPU is suitable for HFR gaming using the GameBench application. During PUBG Mobile, it managed 90 fps with the low graphics setting selected, but using the highest details, it only achieved 40 fps on average. The 120 fps option of the shooter, which was easily displayed by the Xiaomi 15 Pro, was missing at the time of testing. The demanding game Genshin Impact could be displayed by the Xiaomi smartphone at 60 fps in the highest graphics setting—more is currently not possible on Android.

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi 15 Pro; Genshin Impact: Ø59.7 (48-60)
Xiaomi 15 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø89.6 (80-90)
Xiaomi 15 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.9 (57-61)
Xiaomi 15 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø40 (36-41)

Emissions - The Xiaomi phone gets quite warm

Temperature

The Xiaomi 15 Pro leads the SoC's waste heat out of its case evenly. While we measured over 46 °C in the camera area, we noted below 40 °C in the lower case area on the back. Of greater interest, however, is its performance under load.

The 3DMark Wild Life stress tests fortunately only led to a moderate throttling of around 16 to 25 percent for the Xiaomi flagship. This means that the 15 Pro performs significantly better than its smaller sister model and also better than a OnePlus 13 or Oppo Find X8 Pro. However, a reduction in the Snapdragon SoC's system performance due to the heat build-up inside cannot be ruled out, for example when running demanding games and during longer gaming sessions.

Max. Load
 45.2 °C
113 F
43.9 °C
111 F
39.3 °C
103 F
 
 47.9 °C
118 F
45.3 °C
114 F
39.8 °C
104 F
 
 49.3 °C
121 F
45.2 °C
113 F
40 °C
104 F
 
Maximum: 49.3 °C = 121 F
Average: 44 °C = 111 F
38.1 °C
101 F
41.9 °C
107 F
38 °C
100 F
39.4 °C
103 F
43.9 °C
111 F
40.7 °C
105 F
40 °C
104 F
44.8 °C
113 F
46.5 °C
116 F
Maximum: 46.5 °C = 116 F
Average: 41.5 °C = 107 F
Power Supply (max.)  44.1 °C = 111 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.3 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.1 % +9%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.3 %
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67.6 % -10%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.7 % -26%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40.8 % -46%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.5 % +8%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.8 %
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.3 % -9%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 % -33%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.8 % -34%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.8 %
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.5 % -29%
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49 % -42%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48.1 % -43%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77.3 % +1%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.5 %
Vivo X200 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.5 % -26%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.7 % -34%
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø28.8 (26.6-35)
OnePlus 13 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.1 (19.9-39)
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø103.5 (96.3-128)
OnePlus 13 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø92.1 (73.8-132.4)
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø29.4 (28.1-33.5)
OnePlus 13 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø28.1 (19-39.4)
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø15.2 (13.9-18.1)
OnePlus 13 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø14.1 (9.52-18.8)

Speakers

The Xiaomi 15 Pro by no means sets new standards when it comes to audio quality, but its stereo speakers still boast a pleasant sound and light bass. However, its rippling mids and highs are not optimal.

If you want to play music externally, you can use the wired USB-C port, or alternatively Bluetooth 5.4. The latter uses a comparatively large number of codecs and Auracast.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.843.32538.242.73132.929.44033.529.75037.537.36327.1288021.125.41002439.112521.747.116019.552.220016.857.32501362.831515.564.740014.162.150015.763.263020.366.280022.668.5100019.271.8125016.175.7160014.374.9200012.377.225001573.6315019.968.7400021.765.6500024.168630023.277.5800026.976.61000025.772.11250019.168.5160002472.6SPL33.585.5N1.763.5median 19.5median 68.5Delta45.137.642.224.730.82430.924.631.732.139.82233.916.432.52642.819.846.215.652.714.654.111.157.88.25911.560.29.967.78.471.210.271.61178.713.478.412.173.6127812.38112.482.71382.513.176.913.875.913.772.31478.113.774.412.862.224.790.50.683.5median 12.8median 73.61.58.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 15 ProXiaomi 14 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 15 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 14 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery life - The Xiaomi 15 Pro with new battery technology

Power consumption

The Xiaomi 15 Pro uses an advanced battery that combines silicon and carbon in its anode and therefore has a very high capacity. The 6,100 mAh energy storage can be charged either via USB-C at up to 90 watts or wirelessly at 50 watts. Common fast charging protocols (including QC3+ or PD3.0) for power banks are also supported. During our test, we noted a charging time of around 50 minutes with Boost mode activated.

Its power consumption is super efficient both in idle mode and under load. At less than 1 watt, it only consumes almost half compared to our comparison devices, such as the Nubia Z70 Ultra with the Snapdragon 8 Elite.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.6 / 0.9 / 1.1 Watt
Load midlight 6.7 / 9.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi 15 Pro
6100 mAh
OnePlus 13
6000 mAh
Vivo X200 Pro
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24+
4900 mAh
Google Pixel 9 Pro
4700 mAh
Xiaomi 14 Pro
4880 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-58%
-39%
-5%
-30%
-19%
-41%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
0.6
0.86
-43%
0.43
28%
0.43
28%
0.59
2%
0.89
-48%
0.782 ?(0.5 - 0.99, n=6)
-30%
Idle Average *
0.9
1.74
-93%
1.76
-96%
0.84
7%
1.1
-22%
1.05
-17%
1.398 ?(0.9 - 2.06, n=6)
-55%
Idle Maximum *
1.1
1.85
-68%
1.83
-66%
0.95
14%
1.2
-9%
1.11
-1%
1.482 ?(1.1 - 2.1, n=6)
-35%
Load Average *
6.7
10.69
-60%
9.58
-43%
6.76
-1%
7.15
-7%
9.03
-35%
9.72 ?(6.7 - 13, n=6)
-45%
Load Maximum *
9.5
11.92
-25%
11.43
-20%
16.42
-73%
20.37
-114%
9.06
5%
13.4 ?(9.3 - 19.2, n=6)
-41%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.51 (0.64-9.38)
OnePlus 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.08 (0.705-11.9)
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.622 (0.528-0.962)
OnePlus 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.621 (0.576-0.765)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.37 (9.34-9.41)
OnePlus 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.3 (8.53-11.9)
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.622 (0.528-0.962)
OnePlus 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.621 (0.576-0.765)

Runtimes

Its large battery capacity helps the Xiaomi 15 Pro achieve very good runtimes. Our values with an adjusted display brightness (150 cd/m²) provide the best comparability, as they are the same for all test devices. Here, the Xiaomi phone only shut down after over 23 hours when surfing using Wi-Fi, and its endurance during the endless video playback test without Wi-Fi was also strong at 37 hours.

Please note: We will add the idle values soon.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
51h 33min
WiFi Websurfing
24h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
37h 06min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 24min
Xiaomi 15 Pro
6100 mAh
OnePlus 13
6000 mAh
Vivo X200 Pro
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24+
4900 mAh
Google Pixel 9 Pro
4700 mAh
Xiaomi 14 Pro
4880 mAh
Battery Runtime
-10%
-3%
-30%
-30%
-34%
Reader / Idle
3093
2267
-27%
1998
-35%
H.264
2226
2321
4%
1437
-35%
WiFi v1.3
1444
1349
-7%
1404
-3%
1009
-30%
1017
-30%
897
-38%
Load
264
241
-9%
189
-28%

Notebookcheck total rating

The Xiaomi 15 Pro is a real treat and proves to be an interesting choice despite its import restrictions because its price-to-performance ratio is really impressive.

Xiaomi 15 Pro - 12/29/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
92%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
68 / 69 → 98%
Weight
88%
Battery
93%
Display
92%
Games Performance
49 / 55 → 90%
Application Performance
84 / 85 → 99%
AI Performance
46%
Temperature
83%
Noise
100%
Audio
81 / 90 → 90%
Camera
82%
Average
70%
90%