Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

Oppo Find X8 Pro smartphone review - Attack on the iPhone with innovative battery technology

What the others can do, we have been able to do for a long time.

The Find X series is also making a comeback in Europe: with a Hasselblad camera, high-end SoC from MediaTek, bright OLED display and long battery life, the Find X8 Pro has everything it needs in the top segment. But is it enough to challenge the big players?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Brian Burriston (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Android ARM 5G AI Smartphone

Verdict

The Oppo Find X8 Pro looks stylish, is slim and high-quality and doesn't have to hide from other high-end smartphones. However, our test device doesn't want to do this at all; instead, it confidently attacks the big players with its bright and very color-accurate AMOLED screen, generous memory, haptic camera button and a good 6-year update promise.

It has hardly any real weaknesses and can even overtake some of the more established manufacturers with its fast charging technology, both wired and wireless. The quality of the cameras is also very impressive with two zoom lenses and a dedicated portrait lens.

If you compare the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 in the Oppo smartphone to the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite which is likely to power many top phones of the next generation, it becomes clear that our test is significantly slower. Also compared to Apple's A18 Pro the SoC of the Oppo Find X8 Pro loses out. Nevertheless, the performance is more than sufficient for everyday use and you won't notice any difference in the vast majority of apps.

The silicone-carbon battery is a great innovation that can deliver a lot of energy with a low weight and thus enables very good runtimes.

Overall, the Oppo Find X8 Pro, with its flexible camera system, strong endurance and high performance, is definitely a competitor to Apple, Samsung and co.

Pros

+ very fast cell phone
+ high-quality housing
+ waterproof and dustproof
+ very bright and colorful AMOLED
+ great zoom qualities of the camera
+ long runtimes
+ USB 3.2 port
+ eSIM support
+ long update promise
+ precise localization

Cons

- self-confident on price
- few efforts for sustainability
- relatively slow when transmitting via WLAN
- PWM flickering

Price and availability

The Oppo Find X8 Pro is already available in some European countries. The price for the phone with 16 GB RAM and 512 GB mass storage is officially 1,199 Euros (~$1263).

The phone will not be available in Germany until 2025, but you can currently have it shipped to Germany via the Dutch Oppo store, for example and currently even get a 50 Euro (~$53) discount.

Amazon Logo
$15.99
AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Screen Protector for Oppo Find X8 Pro Privacy Glass Full Coverage Anti Spy Tempered Glass Protective Film
  • $4.33
    AKABEILA Compatible with Oppo Find X8 Pro 【1 Pack Screen Protector】 HD Tempered Glass Protective Film 9H Hardness Case Friendly Easy Installation Anti-Fingerprint Bubble Free Black&1
  • $6.57
    [1-Pack] for Oppo Find X8 Pro Screen Protector, HGJTFANY 9H Hardness Tempered Glass Screen Film, Anti-Scratch, Bubble Free, Protective Film for Oppo Find X8 Pro (6.78 Inch)
Bestpreis 921€ Gomibo.at
Oppo Find X8 Pro Space Black
2. 949 € Gomibo.de
3. 1289 € galaxus
4. 1289 € galaxus.at

Possible competitors in comparison

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
87.3%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $15.99
AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr...
2. $4.33
AKABEILA Compatible with Opp...
3. $6.57
[1-Pack] for Oppo Find X8 Pr...
List Price: 1199€
215 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"
2780x1264
450 PPI
AMOLED
2.
86%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $899.99
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - Unlo...
2. $8.98
OMOTON 3+2 Pack for Google P...
3. $5.98
Ferilinso Full Coverage 3 Pa...
List Price: 1299€
221 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"
2992x1344
482 PPI
OLED
3.
88.1%
OnePlus 12
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon: $806.71
List Price: 979 EUR
220 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"
3168x1440
510 PPI
AMOLED
4.
88.6%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro ⎘
Apple A18 Pro GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe
Amazon:
1. $37.00
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Clea...
2. $7.98
Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto...
3. $34.00
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Clear Ca...
List Price: 1449€
227 g256 GB NVMe6.90"
2868x1320
458 PPI
Super Retina XDR OLED
5.
91.1% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon: $989.99
List Price: 1449€
232 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"
3120x1440
505 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X

Oppo has been a little quiet in Europe in recent years, as there have been many challenges for the manufacturer: a clear separation of the brands and the dissolution of the parent company were on the agenda, and the company also had to deal with a patent lawsuit in Germany.

Now, however, the manufacturer is back in full force and wants to prove it with the Oppo Find X8 Pro: A high-end smartphone with the best that the shelves of camera sensor manufacturers, SoC producers and chip suppliers have to offer. The model is already available in China, where it costs around 890 Euros (~$938). It will be more expensive in the West, but the price of the phone is in line with other flagship phones.

Another challenger is certainly good for the cell phone market in Europe and so we are looking forward to the test results of the Oppo smartphone. Are you too? Well, let's get started right away.

Specifications

Oppo Find X8 Pro (Find X8 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 8 x - 3.6 GHz, Cortex-X925, X4, A720
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
Display
6.78 inch 19.8:9, 2780 x 1264 pixel 450 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 2160Hz PWM Dimming (70 nits or below), Dolby Vision, HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 495 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 53, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 41, 48, 53, 70, 71, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 162.3 x 76.7 ( = 0.32 x 6.39 x 3.02 in)
Battery
5910 mAh Silicon-Carbon, 80 Watt charging, 50 Watt wireless charging, 10 Watt reverse wireless charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix 50.0MP, f/​1.6, phase comparison-AF (All-pixel AF/​omnidirectional), laser-AF, OIS, dual LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​60fps (Camera 1); 50.0MP, f/​2.0, phase comparison-AF (All-pixel AF/​omnidirectional), wide angle lens (Camera 2); 50.0MP, f/​4.3, phase comparison-AF, OIS, periscope-telephoto lens (Camera 3); 50.0MP, f/​2.6, phase comparison-AF, OIS, periscope-telephoto lens (Camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.4, 21mm
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, fanless, waterproof
Weight
215 g ( = 7.58 oz / 0.47 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
1199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - Elegant chassis with a slight weakness in feel

The chassis of the Oppo Find X8 Pro is made of glass and aluminum, with a matte dark grey surface or a pearlescent white surface on the back. The blue version from China did not make it to Europe. The aluminum frame matches the color and is also matte. At the top center, the circular camera module stands out from the rest of the housing and is surrounded by a ribbed metal frame.

The look and feel are very high-quality and the classic color scheme allows the smartphone to blend in well with any environment. The glass on the front is rounded towards the corners, although this is much more discreet than on previous models, making accidental touches on the side unlikely. Narrow and symmetrical edges around the display on all sides give the smartphone a modern look.

The workmanship of the Oppo Find X8 Pro is of a very high standard, the device looks robust and feels good in the hand. Only slightly noticeable edges at the transition between the glass and frame as well as a slight creaking when twisted diminish the impression of quality somewhat.

The device has IP68/69 protection class certification, which means it can be taken on a (not too deep) dive in fresh water, it can also be used in dusty environments and is even protected against high-pressure water jets.

At 215 grams (~7.6 oz), the Oppo Find X8 Pro is a fairly lightweight high-end smartphone. In terms of dimensions, it is quite slim at 8.2 millimetres (~0.32 in) thick, but also offers a slightly smaller screen than many other top phones.

Size comparison

164.3 mm / 6.47 in 75.8 mm / 2.98 in 9.2 mm / 0.3622 in 220 g0.485 lbs162.8 mm / 6.41 in 76.6 mm / 3.02 in 8.5 mm / 0.3346 in 221 g0.4872 lbs163 mm / 6.42 in 77.6 mm / 3.06 in 8.25 mm / 0.3248 in 227 g0.5 lbs162.3 mm / 6.39 in 79 mm / 3.11 in 8.6 mm / 0.3386 in 232 g0.511 lbs162.3 mm / 6.39 in 76.7 mm / 3.02 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 215 g0.474 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Features - Lots of memory on board

In Europe, the Oppo flagship will be released in the large memory version with 16 GB RAM and 512 GB mass storage. At 1,199 Euros (~$1263) the price shows the manufacturer has confidence it can compete at a high level. In view of the memory configuration, this is still significantly below the recommended prices for Apple's or Samsung's top models, while at the same time phones such as the OnePlus 12 or an Honor Magic6 Pro are now available for significantly less. The Oppo Find X8 Pro is therefore not currently a bargain. The first deals have already appeared before the official release of the smartphone in Europe.

Internationally, there are also other storage variants, such as with 12 GB RAM and 256 GB mass storage or with 16 GB RAM and 1 TB for data. Also available internationally, but not in Europe, is a variant with satellite communication for emergencies.

For the USB port, Oppo relies on USB 3.2 Gen.1 with up to 5 GBit/s data throughput. It is also possible to output an image signal so that external monitors can be connected via cable. Image transmission is also possible wirelessly via Miracast, although not all monitors support this.

Two nano-SIM slots are available, as is the option of storing an eSIM profile. However, only 2 SIM cards can be used at the same time. There is no microSD reader, but there is an infrared sensor that can be used to operate televisions, for example.

Links: Notification slider
Links: Notification slider
Right: camera button, standby button, volume rocker
Right: camera button, standby button, volume rocker
Above: Microphones, IR blaster
Above: Microphones, IR blaster
Bottom: SIM slot, microphone, USB-C port, microphone, speaker
Bottom: SIM slot, microphone, USB-C port, microphone, speaker

Software - Up to six years of updates

ColorOS 15 is based on Android 15 and shows changes to the standard Android in many areas, whereby the system has a high-quality look and feel and reacts very quickly. In some areas, ColorOS is reminiscent of Apple's iOS in terms of design.

AI is of course an important topic, but users should also be aware of the use of AI immediately, so that this is marked by a colored frame around the display. Thanks to the smart assistants, older images can be scaled up in the Photos app, for example, or texts can be summarized in the Notes app.

The manufacturer promises five OS updates for its phone and security patches until 2030, i.e. for six years.

Sustainability

In terms of sustainability, Oppo offers its customers the opportunity to use the phone for quite a long time thanks to a decent support period for the software.

The smartphone's packaging is plastic-free and is printed with inks based on soybean oil. According to Oppo's sustainability report, 45% of the fibers used for the packaging are already made from recycled materials. However, there is also a dazzling special print on the packaging, although it is not clear whether it was produced using environmentally friendly methods.

For the device itself, there are so far only declarations of intent and no proven use of recycled materials. There is also no focus on reparability by the user and it is almost impossible to check. At ifixit.com there are very few repair guides for only selected models.

Overall, Oppo still has some catching up to do in this area compared to Apple or providers specializing in sustainability such as Fairphone.

Communication and GNSS - Fast WLAN with weaknesses when transmitting

The SoC's Wi-Fi modem also supports the latest Wi-Fi standard, Wi-Fi 7, which we unfortunately cannot test yet because the corresponding routers (especially with a 10 Gbit LAN port) are not yet integrated into our test procedure. In the 6 GHz band, i.e. with WiFi 6E, the Oppo Find X8 Pro is quite fast in terms of reception: We measured an average of 1,610 MBit/s with our reference router Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000.

When sending data, however, the Oppo smartphone falls behind other high-end devices; even when repeating the test several times, we were unable to get more than around 650 Mbps. The Find X8 Pro can still make good use of a gigabit internal line. When it comes to even faster internal networks, there are even faster smartphones on the market.

To access the mobile network, numerous frequencies are supported in both the 4G and 5G networks. This means that the Find X8 Pro can also be taken to foreign countries and should provide access to the mobile internet. Some frequency bands are missing compared to the iPhone 16 Pro Max but this should hardly play a role in everyday life.

The reception is at a high level, as we know from random tests during our test period. Our test device also performs well compared to other high-end phones and does not completely lose the network even in difficult situations, such as between tall buildings.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
OnePlus 12
Wi-Fi 7
1119 (1086min - 1176max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (556 - 1801, n=50)
1012 MBit/s
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Wi-Fi 7
965 (943min - 995max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Wi-Fi 7
887 (567min - 946max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=190, last 2 years)
715 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
556 (253min - 611max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
OnePlus 12
Wi-Fi 7
1857 (1766min - 1917max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (565 - 1875, n=50)
989 MBit/s
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Wi-Fi 7
915 (852min - 926max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
801 (397min - 819max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Wi-Fi 7
762 (726min - 784max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=188, last 2 years)
702 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Wi-Fi 7
1852 (911min - 1895max) MBit/s +229%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
1553 (815min - 1800max) MBit/s +176%
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (563 - 1945, n=39)
1538 MBit/s +173%
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1945, n=80, last 2 years)
1428 MBit/s +154%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Wi-Fi 7
1418 (1324min - 1435max) MBit/s +152%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
563 (494min - 652max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Wi-Fi 7
1864 (1828min - 1880max) MBit/s +16%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
1610 (1480min - 1722max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (892 - 1864, n=39)
1552 MBit/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
1461 (1284min - 1543max) MBit/s -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (668 - 1864, n=80, last 2 years)
1381 MBit/s -14%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Wi-Fi 7
1258 (1190min - 1287max) MBit/s -22%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Oppo Find X8 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø563 (494-652)
Oppo Find X8 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1610 (1480-1722)
GPS test outdoors
GPS test outdoors
Available satellite networks
Available satellite networks

We also check the Oppo Find X8 Pro's location system. To do this, we first go outside and are quickly located with an accuracy of 3 meters (~10 feet). However, even higher accuracy would theoretically be possible, as the phone also supports SBAS for even more precise positioning.

Our practical test on the subject of positioning consists of a round through the city, which we do by car as an exception due to the wintry conditions. The Oppo Find X8 Pro has to prove itself in a direct comparison against the Garmin Venu 2, a smartwatch with particularly precise positioning.

And it does its job very well: there are only a few places where it deviates slightly from the actual route and when crossing a bridge, the outward journey appears to take place in water, but otherwise the phone is accurate enough to be used for tracking in everyday life.

Location Oppo Find X8 Pro - Overview
Location Oppo Find X8 Pro - Overview
Positioning Oppo Find X8 Pro - Turnaround
Positioning Oppo Find X8 Pro - Turnaround
Location Oppo Find X8 Pro - Bridge
Location Oppo Find X8 Pro - Bridge
Positioning Garmin Venu 2 - Overview
Positioning Garmin Venu 2 - Overview
Positioning Garmin Venu 2 - Turnaround
Positioning Garmin Venu 2 - Turnaround
Positioning Garmin Venu 2 - Bridge
Positioning Garmin Venu 2 - Bridge

Phone functions and voice quality - Occasionally a little muffled

ColorOS uses Google's phone app by default, but phone apps from other providers can also be easily installed and set as the default.

The voice quality via the internal earpiece is decent, although the person we are talking to sounds a little muffled from time to time. The microphone records our voice clearly, but tends to distort with loud voices.

The speaker and hands-free microphone pick up the other person's voice with significantly less bass, making it sound a little thinner. However, the other person's voice is still clear and easy to understand. What we say is recorded well, even if we don't speak very loudly.

Cameras - Four cameras as a dream team

Recording front camera
Recording front camera

There are four 50-megapixel lenses at the back, from the ultra-wide-angle lens to the main camera and two periscope telephoto lenses, each with a different focal length and therefore a wide range of image composition options.

Our zoom series shows that even a 100x zoom from the hand still produces quite good results in daylight and the image still looks very sharp with a 50x zoom. This makes the Oppo Find X8 Pro one of the most powerful zoom smartphones currently available on the market.

Images from the main camera also look high-quality, although the artificial bokeh in the background of the plant image is a little too strong. In the focus area, the image is precise and rich in detail. The high dynamic range in the ambient image causes problems for both the Oppo camera and the comparison phones, as the shiny hands of the church clock always over-glow. Overall, the Oppo phone creates a good image with realistic color reproduction. Even in low light, many structures still look very sharp.

The wide-angle camera works cleanly and even shows the surroundings in more detail than some other high-end phones.

There is a 32 megapixel camera on the front, which takes great selfies and also has no problems with bright backgrounds and less well-lit faces.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera PlantMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low LightWide Angle camera
0.6x zoom
0.6x zoom
1x zoom
1x zoom
2x zoom
2x zoom
3x zoom
3x zoom
6x zoom
6x zoom
10x zoom
10x zoom
15x zoom
15x zoom
20x zoom
20x zoom
30x zoom
30x zoom
50x zoom
50x zoom
100x zoom
100x zoom
120x zoom
120x zoom

The main camera has to show what it can do in the lab. There are slight problems with the contrast, but overall the display looks very sharp. At only 1 lux, our test chart looks rough, but the content is still clearly recognizable.

The color display is also quite realistic, as the phone proves in the comparison photos of the color chart.

ColorChecker
7.7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X8 Pro: 6.48 ∆E min: 2.13 - max: 12.21 ∆E
ColorChecker
26.9 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
30 ∆E
34 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
45 ∆E
47 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
30 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
38.7 ∆E
38.4 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X8 Pro: 32.16 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 46.99 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Delivered without charger

The Oppo Find X8 Pro does not come with a charger, only a charging cable and a SIM tool. A suitable charger costs around 40 Euros (~$42) in the company's online store and is available for less at amazon.de from 27 Euros (~$28).

The manufacturer offers a warranty of 24 months for smartphones purchased in Europe.

Input devices & operation - Quick to operate

The touchscreen of the Oppo Find X8 Pro is scanned for touches up to 240 times per second. It can be operated very smoothly and reliably and is also sensitive at the edges and in the corners.

There is also a mode that makes the touchscreen even more responsive, making it easier to use with gloves. In addition, the speed of the animations can be set faster so that the system reacts even more directly.

As a special feature, the Oppo Find X8 Pro also has two physical buttons on the casing, which are located next to the volume rocker and the standby button: an alert slider, which enables the selection of vibration, ringtone or mute for notifications.

Oppo has also installed a haptic camera button, which is strikingly reminiscent of Apple's new camera button on the iPhone 16 series. It also works identically: the camera mode can be activated by pressing it twice, even from standby. You can zoom in by sliding your finger and take a photo by pressing it once. This works well and is a nice addition for photo fans.

The fingerprint sensor is located behind the screen and quite far down on the device. This makes it somewhat difficult to reach if you only hold the phone in one hand. When setting up the fingerprint, you should definitely make sure that you also register a touch that is a little higher up. Overall, however, the sensor works very reliably and unlocks the device without any waiting time.

Unlocking via facial recognition is also possible, but this is only carried out in two dimensions via the front camera without additional sensors. This method is therefore somewhat more susceptible to manipulation and cannot be used as verification for some security measures.

Keyboard upright
Keyboard upright
Keyboard landscape
Keyboard landscape

Display - Bright and true to color

Subpixel image
Subpixel image

The AMOLED screen of the Oppo Find X8 Pro achieves a very fine display with 2,780 x 1,264 pixels and a size of 6.8 inches.

The maximum brightness in everyday use is around 1,160 cd/m², but up to 4,500 cd/m² is possible on small surfaces in HDR mode.

We measured PWM flickering at very low brightness levels, but with a frequency adapted to the frame rate. Nevertheless, sensitive people should try out the screen before finally buying the phone to see if symptoms such as headaches or strained eyes occur.

1168
cd/m²
1157
cd/m²
1155
cd/m²
1166
cd/m²
1167
cd/m²
1161
cd/m²
1152
cd/m²
1164
cd/m²
1149
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1168 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1159.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1167 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.87 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.311
Oppo Find X8 Pro
AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
OLED, 2992x1344, 6.8"
OnePlus 12
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9"
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.8"
Screen
42%
-41%
-58%
-95%
Brightness middle
1167
2148
84%
1026
-12%
1055
-10%
1317
13%
Brightness
1160
2050
77%
991
-15%
1061
-9%
1365
18%
Brightness Distribution
98
86
-12%
91
-7%
93
-5%
94
-4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.87
0.5
43%
1.19
-37%
1.5
-72%
3.4
-291%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.64
1.4
15%
3.3
-101%
4.7
-187%
5
-205%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
0.8
43%
2.4
-71%
2.3
-64%
2.8
-100%
Gamma
2.311 95%
2.23 99%
2.24 98%
2.21 100%
2 110%
CCT
6426 101%
6582 99%
6920 94%
6625 98%
6458 101%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.5

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 86 Hz
Amplitude: 19 %

The display backlight flickers at 86 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 86 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8684 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

minimum brightness
minimum brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings

In our measurements with the spectrophotometer and the CalMAN software, it is noticeable that the screen can achieve a very accurate color representation in "Pro" mode. A deviation of the color tones and grey levels is no longer visible to the naked eye and is hardly measurable for many color values. This also allows the professional evaluation of colors on the screen.

CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color space sRGB
CalMAN color space sRGB
CalMAN color space AdobeRGB
CalMAN color space AdobeRGB
CalMAN color space DCI P3
CalMAN color space DCI P3
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8 ms rise
↘ 0.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Thanks to the high brightness, the display can also be used well outdoors, whereby spending time in a shady environment significantly reduces the reflections on the screen and makes it even more pleasant to read.

The image is still very easy to see even from flat viewing angles, as there is no visible shift in color or brightness values.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Point of view
Point of view

Performance - The new SoC convinces

The MediaTek Dimensity 9400 is a fairly new SoC with which MediaTek wants to secure its place in the high-end segment. The Oppo Find X8 Pro comes with the chip, which enables processor clock rates of up to 3.62 GHz.

Our benchmarks show that it is not quite enough for a top position: although a superiority over this year's top smartphones is definitely visible, the Oppo flagship does not come close to the iPhone 16 Pro Max in terms of processor performance. In addition, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite casts its shadow ahead, with which many of next year's flagships will probably be equipped. We have already been able to test the reference design and, thanks to specially designed CPU units, it is even more powerful.

However, it is questionable whether the performance difference will be noticeable in everyday use, as the power of the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 in the Oppo Find X8 Pro is enough to run the vast majority of apps smoothly and with short loading times. You will only notice a difference with very complex tasks such as video editing with many clips.

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
3479 Points +34%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (2605 - 2748, n=2)
2677 Points +3%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2605 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2287 Points -12%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2148 Points -18%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1950 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=179, last 2 years)
1482 Points -43%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
8568 Points +15%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (7480 - 8574, n=2)
8027 Points +7%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
7480 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
7102 Points -5%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6630 Points -11%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4741 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=179, last 2 years)
4163 Points -44%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (1838 - 1998, n=2)
1918 Points +4%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1838 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1716 Points -7%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1672 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=175, last 2 years)
1035 Points -44%
Multi-Core
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (5870 - 8126, n=2)
6998 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6426 Points +9%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6088 Points +4%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
5870 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=175, last 2 years)
3459 Points -41%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (2374537 - 2705165, n=2)
2539851 Points +7%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2374537 Points
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2005881 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1837994 Points -23%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
1739816 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=112, last 2 years)
1298428 Points -45%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18672 Points +52%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
15690 Points +27%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (12314 - 15849, n=2)
14082 Points +14%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
13235 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13228 Points +7%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
12314 Points
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
1517 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1443 Points +26%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (1145 - 1663, n=2)
1404 Points +23%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1304 Points +14%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1145 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1081 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=165, last 2 years)
928 Points -19%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (10697 - 12594, n=2)
11646 Points +9%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
10697 Points
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
10522 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9696 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 13729, n=159, last 2 years)
6461 Points -40%
System
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
16475 Points +28%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
14531 Points +13%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (12891 - 16162, n=2)
14527 Points +13%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
12891 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 19891, n=159, last 2 years)
10311 Points -20%
Memory
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (9432 - 13673, n=2)
11553 Points +22%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
11357 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
10389 Points +10%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
9432 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=159, last 2 years)
7030 Points -25%
Graphics
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
56004 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (51898 - 56004, n=2)
53951 Points -4%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
38959 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
27905 Points -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=159, last 2 years)
17931 Points -68%
Web
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (1923 - 2183, n=2)
2053 Points +7%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1923 Points
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1907 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1815 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=159, last 2 years)
1572 Points -18%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (75143 - 81594, n=2)
78369 Points +4%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
75143 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18852 Points -75%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
18127 Points -76%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17686 Points -76%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (51509 - 52884, n=2)
52197 Points +1%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
51509 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
33044 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25263 Points -51%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1518 Points -97%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1473 Points -97%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (1368 - 1543, n=2)
1456 Points +6%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1368 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 4619, n=43, last 2 years)
782 Points -43%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
488 Points -64%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
442 Points -68%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (9283 - 9476, n=2)
9380 Points +1%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
9283 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4754 Points -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 32432, n=43, last 2 years)
3693 Points -60%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
487 Points -95%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (12709 - 13068, n=2)
12889 Points +1%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
12709 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
6286 Points -51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=43, last 2 years)
5321 Points -58%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1128 Points -91%

The ARM Immortalis-G925 with 12 cores is used as the graphics chip in the SoC. It offers a lot of performance and can also partly replace the Apple A18 Pro GPU in graphics calculations. Devices with the Snapdragon 8 Elite will offer significantly more graphics power, as our tests of the reference device show.

Nevertheless, according to the benchmarks, even complex games in 4K resolution should run at around 40 fps on the Oppo smartphone, so there is hardly any reason to demand even more graphics power.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5383 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4804 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
4739 Points -12%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4331 Points -20%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2605 Points -52%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6303 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5040 Points -20%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
4752 Points -25%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4444 Points -29%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2548 Points -60%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9461 Points
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8237 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
8146 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7510 Points -21%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9553 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8620 Points -10%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
8264 Points -13%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8017 Points -16%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1998 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
1715 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1629 Points -18%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1598 Points -20%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1050 Points -47%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
2069 Points +1%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2054 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1796 Points -13%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1667 Points -19%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1031 Points -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
744 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
549 fps -26%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
539 fps -28%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
536 fps -28%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +88%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -6%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -6%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
469 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
339 fps -28%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
324 fps -31%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
294 fps -37%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps +95%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
341 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps -28%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
231 fps -32%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
225 fps -34%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps +38%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
172 fps
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
147 fps -15%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
143 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
142 fps -17%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps +20%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps -25%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98 fps
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 fps -28%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
56 fps -43%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -55%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps +90%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70 fps +17%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
188 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
187 fps -24%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
184 fps -26%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps -52%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40 fps -2%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps -15%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
30 fps -27%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -51%

When surfing the Internet, the Oppo Find X8 Pro is only moderately fast for a high-end phone in the benchmarks. Hardly anyone can compete with the surfing speed of the iPhone anyway, but other Android devices are also significantly faster in some benchmarks.

In everyday use, even very complex websites load quickly and images are usually available while scrolling, so the performance of the Oppo phone is completely sufficient here too.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
353.735 Points +64%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (216 - 234, n=2)
225 Points +4%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
215.998 Points
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
215.5 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
209.919 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
126 Points -42%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
557 runs/min +107%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
289 runs/min +7%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (269 - 271, n=2)
270 runs/min 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
269 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
265 runs/min -1%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
145.8 runs/min -46%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
33.5 runs/min +106%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (16.3 - 17.7, n=2)
17 runs/min +4%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
16.3 runs/min
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
14.9 runs/min -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=71, last 2 years)
12.1 runs/min -26%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
271 Points +84%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
212 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
195 Points +33%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (147 - 225, n=2)
186 Points +27%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
147 Points
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
118.6 Points -19%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
100368 Points +65%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (60987 - 86943, n=2)
73965 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
72011 Points +18%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
68223 Points +12%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (Chrome 129)
61885 Points +1%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
60987 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=211, last 2 years)
38768 Points -36%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1512 ms * -142%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
625.4 ms *
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
624.1 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
599 ms * +4%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (432 - 625, n=2)
528 ms * +16%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
279.4 ms * +55%

* ... smaller is better

Thanks to UFS 4.0 storage, the Oppo smartphone does not have to hide in this discipline either, on the contrary: it is significantly faster than Google's Pixel 9 Pro XL and on a par with other high-quality Android phones.

Oppo Find X8 ProGoogle Pixel 9 Pro XLOnePlus 12Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
43%
139%
14%
89%
20%
Sequential Read 256KB
3482.9
1850.5
-47%
3297.57
-5%
3610.25
4%
Sequential Write 256KB
3498.5
1280.56
-63%
3246.21
-7%
1893.63
-46%
3019 ?(1524 - 3889, n=37)
-14%
Random Read 4KB
375.7
310.88
-17%
438.5
17%
437.12
16%
Random Write 4KB
100.4
398.27
297%
652.8
550%
181.55
81%

Games - 120 fps is not just a dream

The Oppo Find X8 Pro is a very powerful gaming phone, as we discovered during our tests with some of the most popular mobile games.

The graphically demanding Genshin Impact, for example, runs at a smooth 60 fps, while PUBG Mobile even offers 120 Hz at very low settings for even smoother scrolling and better responsiveness. We test the frame rates with the software from GameBench.

Gaming via the screen is also very easy to use thanks to the precise touchscreen.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Oppo Find X8 Pro; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø59.8 (56-61)
Oppo Find X8 Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø59.4 (50-61)
Oppo Find X8 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø119 (111-121)
Oppo Find X8 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.6 (35-41)
Oppo Find X8 Pro; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low: Ø59.6 (58-61)
Oppo Find X8 Pro; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High: Ø59.7 (57-61)

Emissions - Significant throttling noticeable

Temperature

Under prolonged load, the smartphone heats up to 47.1 °C (116.78 °F), which is clearly noticeable but not yet critical. However, we measure at room temperature, so the casing temperatures could be significantly higher on hot summer days.

The SoC's performance is also affected by the high temperatures: In our long-term benchmarks from 3DMark, there are sometimes performance drops of up to 45%.

Max. Load
 44.5 °C
112 F
43.2 °C
110 F
40.4 °C
105 F
 
 46.6 °C
116 F
43.1 °C
110 F
39.2 °C
103 F
 
 47.1 °C
117 F
43.2 °C
110 F
40.1 °C
104 F
 
Maximum: 47.1 °C = 117 F
Average: 43 °C = 109 F
37.7 °C
100 F
39.2 °C
103 F
42 °C
108 F
39.5 °C
103 F
42.3 °C
108 F
41 °C
106 F
39.5 °C
103 F
43.1 °C
110 F
43 °C
109 F
Maximum: 43.1 °C = 110 F
Average: 40.8 °C = 105 F
Power Supply (max.)  41.2 °C = 106 F | Room Temperature 19 °C = 66 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
94.6 % +2%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92.3 %
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78.3 % -15%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.5 % -25%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.1 % -50%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.4 % +40%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79.3 % +37%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
65.5 % +13%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 %
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.4 % -3%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
72.6 % +31%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.5 %
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.9 % -3%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.1 % +44%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82.1 % +35%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.6 % +26%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
73.4 % +20%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 %
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø28.1 (22.2-38.3)
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø14.6 (12.4-15.7)
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.1 (22.9-28.2)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø20.8 (19.3-29.5)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø21.3 (17.6-31.2)
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø67 (63.3-68.6)
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø46.3 (36.8-52.9)
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø84 (79.2-101.1)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø58.5 (56.7-59.9)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø61 (47.5-102.9)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø76.8 (70.5-109.8)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø87.8 (72-121.8)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø21.2 (20.6-28.9)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø21.1 (16.3-31.3)
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø28.3 (21.7-39.1)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø20.8 (20.2-27.7)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø17.6 (13.8-25.6)
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.3 (11.1-18.3)
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.49 (6.32-7.69)
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø11.3 (11-12.5)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø10.9 (10.6-14.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø9.47 (9.01-11.8)
heatmap front
heatmap front
heatmap back
heatmap back

Speaker

The speaker on the bottom edge is supported by the earpiece as a second speaker. This also enables slight stereo effects. The Oppo Find X8 Pro's sound system can get quite loud overall and offers a good reproduction of medium frequencies. High tones do not sound too unpleasant overall, even at very high volumes, but still seem somewhat overemphasized. This is probably mainly due to the fact that bass is virtually inaudible.

For a high-end smartphone, the speaker system is well done and can reproduce music and movie sound appropriately. However, you can of course get even better sound via high-quality speakers or speakers that can be connected via Bluetooth or USB-C. Both work without any problems. The most important wireless audio codecs are available, but you will search in vain for more exotic codecs such as Opus or LC3.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.943.92540.635.33134.832.14034.433.85037.835.56327.728.18018.431.410021.241.912524.44816023.653.620022.458.825019.562.231519.866.440014.464.850012.86963014.275.680013.173.2100012.473.1125010.773.8160010.875.2200010.576.5250011.278.6315011.779.5400012.270.8500011.970.7630012.177.4800012.277.21000012.177.91250011.859.41600011.454.1SPL2587.8N0.776.1median 12.2median 73.1Delta2.67.536.246.130.739.625.643.926.742.836.743.624.644.317.64618.743.218.245.715.956.617.356.115.260.214.160.413.461.313.866.514.367.713.774.912.478.112.778.612.177.212.981.612.584.612.284.112.88413.18413.578.513.176.913.7741466.813.36425.2930.792.2median 13.5median 74.91.210.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Find X8 ProSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Find X8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery life - Fast charging and long runtimes

Energy consumption

The SoC's production process uses the modern 3 nm process, which should enable high efficiency. And indeed, the Oppo Find X8 Pro is very economical in terms of energy consumption, both under low and high load.

The phone can be charged with up to 80 watts via Oppo's own Supervooc, after which it takes less than an hour for the device to be fully charged again. Power Delivery is also supported, so the Find X8 Pro can be charged without any problems using any of the chargers in our test lab, it just takes a little longer. Up to 50 watts of power is available for wireless charging. Reverse charging with up to 10 watts is also possible.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.6 / 0.8 / 0.9 Watt
Load midlight 6.8 / 10.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oppo Find X8 Pro
5910 mAh
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
5060 mAh
OnePlus 12
5400 mAh
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
4685 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-59%
-45%
-20%
-64%
-24%
-40%
Idle Minimum *
0.6
0.48
20%
1.3
-117%
0.42
30%
0.73
-22%
0.515 ?(0.43 - 0.6, n=2)
14%
Idle Average *
0.8
1.53
-91%
0.95
-19%
1.55
-94%
1.22
-53%
1.28 ?(0.8 - 1.76, n=2)
-60%
Idle Maximum *
0.9
1.86
-107%
1.12
-24%
1.58
-76%
1.34
-49%
1.365 ?(0.9 - 1.83, n=2)
-52%
Load Average *
6.8
10.55
-55%
3.41
50%
16.52
-143%
8.19 ?(6.8 - 9.58, n=2)
-20%
Load Maximum *
10.9
11.72
-8%
11.82
-8%
16.58
-52%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Oppo Find X8 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.9 (0.652-11.1)
Oppo Find X8 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.685 (0.559-0.896)

Power Consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Oppo Find X8 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.6 (10.5-10.8)
Oppo Find X8 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.685 (0.559-0.896)

Battery life

Oppo has opted for innovation with the battery and is not using a classic lithium-ion battery, but a battery with a silicone-carbon-based anode. This is already familiar from the Honor Magic6 Pro where great runtimes were achieved with this technology.

The silicone anode enables a significantly higher energy density, so you can store significantly more energy with the same size. Or you can make the battery much smaller and still store the same amount of energy as in a larger conventional lithium-ion battery with a graphite anode. In addition, the temperature sensitivity of the battery is significantly lower and silicone is a raw material that is available in large quantities. However, production is currently still quite complicated and expensive.

In any case, the technology works quite well in the Oppo Find X8 Pro, at least in what it is primarily intended to do, namely enable long runtimes: Thanks to the high energy density, there is 5,910 mAh of capacity in the battery, which enables runtimes of 23:31 hours in our WLAN test, significantly more than many other high-end devices. The Oppo Find X8 Pro is also very enduring under low load.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
61h 05min
WiFi Websurfing
23h 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
32h 56min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 9min
Oppo Find X8 Pro
5910 mAh
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
5060 mAh
OnePlus 12
5400 mAh
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
4685 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-29%
-22%
5%
-24%
Reader / Idle
3665
1965
-46%
4226
15%
2227
-39%
H.264
1976
1820
-8%
1990
1%
1922
-3%
WiFi v1.3
1411
998
-29%
1237
-12%
1249
-11%
1148
-19%
Load
309
357
16%
202
-35%

Notebookcheck overall rating

The Oppo Find X8 Pro is a very exciting competitor to the high-end phones from the more established manufacturers. With an extremely long battery life, fast charging, a great camera system, a fast SoC and comprehensive features, the device is impressive all round.

You get a high-quality phone for your money, but the Oppo Find X8 Pro is not a bargain at the moment.

Oppo Find X8 Pro - 11/26/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
53 / 69 → 77%
Weight
88%
Battery
93%
Display
92%
Games Performance
47 / 55 → 86%
Application Performance
70 / 85 → 82%
AI Performance
79%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
83 / 90 → 92%
Camera
87%
Average
69%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
80%
Power Use
96.2%
Repairability
0%
Software Updates
96.7%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 45.5%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Read all 4 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Oppo Find X8 Pro smartphone review - Attack on the iPhone with innovative battery technology
Florian Schmitt, 2024-11-27 (Update: 2024-11-28)