Notebookcheck Logo

Camera battle: $300 phone knocks out $1,870 phone and Samsung wins

An illustration. $300 CMF Phone 2 Pro went against the  Sony Xperia 1 VII (Image source: DrMoRobot/Canva and Geralt/Pixabay; edited)
An illustration. $300 CMF Phone 2 Pro went against the Sony Xperia 1 VII (Image source: DrMoRobot/Canva and Geralt/Pixabay; edited)
Versus posted a camera test video two weeks ago on its YouTube channel. The video featured the results of a series of blind tests conducted with the participation of its YouTube community, using photos from 12 different phones.

The tests involved 12 phones — 11 flagship smartphones and 1 entry-level device: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, Honor Magic 7 Pro, iPhone 16 Pro Max, OnePlus 13, Oppo Find X8 Ultra, Google Pixel 9 Pro XL, Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra, Vivo X200 Ultra, Xiaomi 15 Ultra, Motorola Edge 60 Pro, Sony Xperia 1 VII, and Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro.

For the first test, the Galaxy S25 Ultra beat the Magic 7 Pro by a landslide, sweeping up 77% of the votes. In the second test, the iPhone 16 Pro Max landed a headshot by recording the highest margin of all tests — 85% — sending the OnePlus 13 back to the lobby. In the third test, the Find X8 Ultra gracefully swayed 74% of the voters, knocking out the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL.

The real shocker came in the sixth test of the first round, where the $300 Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro managed to pull 59% of the voters to its side, sending home the ∼$1,870 Sony Xperia 1 VII. Three days ago, we reported on a 'Nothing camera test' where the CMF Phone 2 Pro (curr. $300 on Amazon) also put up a surprising performance against higher-end opponents.

In the second round of tests, Samsung sent Apple home with 64% of the votes, Vivo sent Oppo packing with 83% of the votes, and Xiaomi crushed Nothing's ego with 62% of the votes.

The photos used in the comparison of Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and iPhone 16 Pro Max (Image source: Versus; screenshot)
The photos used in the comparison of Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and iPhone 16 Pro Max (Image source: Versus; screenshot)

The final round was divided into two sections: daylight and nighttime. In the daylight test, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra bagged 54% of the votes, leaving the Xiaomi 15 Ultra and Vivo X200 Ultra with 4% and 42%, respectively. In nighttime photography, however, the tables turned — the Xiaomi 15 Ultra won with 73% of the votes, with the Samsung and Vivo devices recording 22% and 4%, respectively.

Xiaomi's victory in the nighttime test wasn't an accident. Though its telephoto and ultrawide lenses struggled with low-light shots in our tests, the main camera thrives in the low-light conditions as revealed in our review. This is largely due to the Xiaomi 15 Ultra’s large 1/0.98" LYT-900 sensor, which is bigger than the 1/1.28" LYT-818 and the 1/1.3" ISOCELL HP2 sensors in the Vivo X200 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra.

Here is how the devices ranked in the end:

  1. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (44% of votes)
  2. Vivo X200 Ultra (29% of the votes)
  3. Xiaomi 15 Ultra (27% of votes)

NB: These blind tests involved the Versus community — not professional photographers. They were also very limited — involving only the main camera and, for the most part, daylight photos. For a more grounded comparison, refer to detailed analyses like the one we made comparing the Xiaomi 15 Ultra, Oppo Find X8 Ultra, Vivo X200 Ultra, and Galaxy S25 Ultra.

Source(s)

Versus and Sony: 1 and 2

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > News > News Archive > Newsarchive 2025 07 > Camera battle: $300 phone knocks out $1,870 phone and Samsung wins
Chibuike Okpara, 2025-07-29 (Update: 2025-07-29)